Syntax error in upgrade(ECC6.0)

Hi Guys,
types: begin of t_ctr_auth,
       prctr like cepc-prctr,
       end of t_ctr_auth.
data: i_ctr_auth type hashed table of t_ctr_auth
      with unique key prctr
      with header line.
perform p100_authority_check 
        using i_ctr_auth[]   
              object         
              c_kokrs        
              sel_centres-low
              cepc-khinr.    
form p100_authority_check
     using i_ctr_auth[] " structure zfu_ok_centres
           object
           kokrs
           ctr
           khinr.
endform.
iam getting error " i_ctr_auth[] "  no longer allowed
Please correct the error .
Its important ,Please respond ASAP.
Regards,
Lee

Hi,
try it like this:
DATA: IMARA TYPE TABLE OF MARA.
DATA: SMARA TYPE MARA.
SELECT * FROM MARA INTO TABLE IMARA UP TO 10 ROWS.
PERFORM FORM_MARA TABLES IMARA.
FORM FORM_MARA TABLES IMARA.
  BREAK-POINT.
ENDFORM.
Regards, dieter

Similar Messages

  • Syntax error in upgrade

    Hi .
    How to resolve this syntax error in upgrade 7.0 ?
    FIELD-SYMBOLS: <t_zsrm_change> LIKE LINE OF t_zsrm_change.
    APPEND <t_zsrm_change> TO change_item.
        AT END OF <t_zsrm_change>-logsys.
    Error :  <t_zsrm_change>-logsys is not defined as field symbol .
    But this error doesnt exists in 4.6 c version .
    Moderator message: please stop flooding the forum with your upgrade errors, invest some effort to solve these yourself before unloading your work here.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 19, 2011 4:31 PM

    Hi,
       Try writing as :
    AT END OF logsys.  or  AT END OF (<t_zsrm_change>-logsys).
    Regards,
    Srini.

  • Syntax error after upgrade to ECC6

    Hi,
    I have customized infotype and BAPI in SAP 4.6. After upgade to ECC6, my Infotype is working fine, but my BAPI give this error : 
    The following syntax error was found in the program SAPLZBAPI_HR :
    "INCLUDE report "%_HR9000" not found."
    If I goto SE38 to recreate %_HR9000, SAP not allow me to continue and appear message "Do not use any special character".
    May I know how to resolve this problem ?
    Thanks a million.
    Regards,
    Eric

    Hi,
    In the ECC6.0 version, it seems that one of the INCLUDE that was generated for that infotype in 4.6 C ending.. with words....HR9000 was not transported or not found for that infotype. Please check all the includes..
    In SE38 you can enter the characters like %, so that error  is coming
    % means LIKE PATTERN ....HR9000 .
    Hope you understood.
    Regards,
    ANJI

  • Too many syntax errors after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    We have made a test upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. OS --> AIX 5.3; DB --> DB2 8.2. After upgrade we have a lot of syntax errors, why? Anybody has the same problem? Do I must to check all my programs?
    Thanks.
    Martin

    Hello, here there is an example in Z program, but I have seen in no Z programs too with includes or userexits in the second example.
    Thanks.
    Martin.
    first example:
    Error in the ABAP Application Program                                                                               
    The current ABAP program "GBT10CO0" had to be terminated because it has        
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.                                                                               
    The following syntax error occurred in program "ZGGBR000 " in include "ZGGBR000
    " in                                                                          
    line 279:                                                                      
    ""SYST-MODNO" must be a character-type data object (data type C, N, D, "       
    "T or STRING) ."                                                               
    second example:
    Error in the ABAP Application Program                                                                               
    The current ABAP program "SAPLGBL5" had to be terminated because it has       
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.                                                                               
    The following syntax error occurred in program "GBT10FI0 " in include "GBT10FIB
    " in                                                                         
    line 1288:                                                                    
    "The FORM "SEND_CMPLX_DATA_015" does not exist."

  • Syntax error in upgrade version 7.0

    Hi ,
    how to close this error in upgrade 7.0 ?
    Lista is a structure having more than 10 fileds.
    READ LINE lista INDEX sy-tabix.
    Error : Lista may not be converted to number .
    This error doesnt exists in 4.6 version
    Moderator message: please stop flooding the forum with your upgrade errors, invest some effort to solve these yourself before unloading your work here.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 19, 2011 4:33 PM

    Try with declaring an work area and change the read statement like:
    READ LINE lista
    INTO <work area>
    INDEX sy-tabix.

  • Syntax errors after upgrade

    Hi,
    We have upgraded our development system to BI7.0 SP7 and currently shortdumps in the system when we try to manage/administer the info-providers. The problem seems to be that the interface IF_RSBK_REQUEST has a method GET_DELETABLE which is missing in our system. It is however, present in our sandbox installation and there we have no such issues.
      The problem seems to have begun when we tried to implement the note 914938 where SAP shipped some transport requests in a zip file. But we are not sure about this.
      We seem to no chance to get the original version of the interface and the implementing classes back.
    Did anybody have any such experiences during the upgrade of their systems?
    Girish

    Hi Girish,
    as stated in the OSS note #914938 it is obsolete after the application of SPS 7. With the application of the note you have overwritten part of SPS7.
    If you use SNOTE with versioning, you can revert to a version prior to the application of the note.
    Otherwise, you most likely have to revert to backup.
      Cheers
         SAP NetWeaver 2004s Ramp-Up BI Back Office Team

  • Syntax Error in Web UI component post upgrade

    Hi Experts,
    We have a enhanced component in IC agent which is giving syntax error post upgrade from 7.0 to EHP2. It seems some attributes have been removed/altered in the new super class.
    In this case do we need to delete the component enhancement and re do the effort or is there any way to regenerate the enhanced component ?
    Thanks, Please help.
    Rohit

    Hi Rohit,
    I've written a few blogs where I collected the different steps necessary in CRM after an EhP or SP upgrade. Furthermore I described solutions to common problems in these blogs. Please have a look an see if one of the described approaches is suitable for your problem.
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-44983
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-49317
    http://scn.sap.com/community/crm/upgrades-and-enhancement-packs/blog/2014/02/21/sap-crm-ehp3-upgrade
    Best,
    Christian

  • IDOC Syntax Error E0072 with status 26 after upgrade to ECC6.0

    Hi
    We have upgraded SAP R/3 from 4.6C to ECC6.0. After upgrade, when we create PO and output EDI, we are seeing this IDOC syntax error E0072 for Mandatory Segment E1EDK01. In 4.6C it was working fine with no issues, only after upgrade this problem started. It says E1EDK01 is missing which is mandatory. We are using basic type ORDERS01 with no extensions. When we see WE30 it looks fine, WE20 settings looks fine.
    Order of the segments got scrambled in upgraded version. First segment is E1EDP19001, this is supposed to be under E1EDP01 segment. There are two E1EDP19001 segments created but there were no sub segments to E1EDP01.
    Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Pandiri

    User Exit activation and fixing the issue in user exit fixed this issue.

  • Syntax error in F110 while making proposal,upgraded from 4.7ee to ECC6.0

    Hi,
    We have upgraded the SAP from 4.7ee to ECC6.0.We are facing post upgradation issues.
    While executing proposal in Trx.code F110(APP),it is going to ABAP dump,throughing a syntax error FILL_PAYGR_FROM_BSEC.
    Please guide me to solve this issue.
    Regards,
    Nageswar Rao J

    I suggest to open an OSS call for that issue (component  FI-AP-AP-B).
    Markus

  • After upgrading to Yosemite, Thunderbird does not recognize email addresses: "syntax error" in recipient address. Fix?

    After upgrading to IOS Yosemite, Thunderbird will no longer send emails to the contacts in my history file that drops down when I "write" a new message. I continue to get a return response that there is a syntax error in the address field of the message although I have tried both my stored emails and manually typed email addresses. What has been changed and how do I recover the use of Thunderbird's great program?
    By the way, how do I eliminate out of date email addresses from popping up and populating email responses rather than the most current ones that are in my contacts? I now have to type each one in separately as the default options that come up are many out of date.
    Thanks much for your great work. Mozilla and Firefox are the best.

    Did you find a solution to this issue?  My mail server is doing the same thing.  I've tried six migrations now, and have a couple of tickets open, but they all have issues.  I have worked around all of them except the mail server problem.
    I did some more digging; the problem appears to be that on a migrated server, it leaves all of your mail store in the old location, doesn't move it, and then doesn't appear to upgrade spam-assassin properly.  The net effect is that the mail server gets the SMTP communication, tries to pass the message into spam assassin, and then it goes south.
    I see errors like this littered in the logs:
    Jul 31 13:53:10 mail org.amavis.amavisd[5927]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
    Jul 31 13:53:10 mail org.amavis.amavisd[5927]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: No such file or directory
    Do you see anything similar?

  • Syntax error in program "CL_HTTP_SERVER=CP " after EHP4 Upgrade

    Hi All,
    Iam getting ABAP dumps after upgrading my system to EHP4  Windows ABAP+JAVA stack,
    Syntax error in program "CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP ".
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLHTTP_RUNTIME" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    The following syntax error occurred in program
    "CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP " in include
    "CL_HTTP_SERVER================CM00F " in
    line 15:
    "Field "C_IS_SHOW_SERVER_HEADER" is unknown. It is neither in one of th"
    "e specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. ."
    The include has been created and last changed by:
    Created by: "SAP "
    Last changed by: "SAP "
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLHTTP_RUNTIME" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    What can you do?
        Please eliminate the error by performing a syntax check
        (or an extended program check) on the program "CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP
        You can also perform the syntax check from the ABAP Editor.
        If the problem persists, proceed as follows:
        Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
        To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
        administrator.
        Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
        at and manage termination messages, and you can also
        keep them for a long time.
    Error analysis
        The following syntax error was found in the program
         CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP :
        "Field "C_IS_SHOW_SERVER_HEADER" is unknown. It is neither in one of th"
        "e specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. ."
    Regards
    Uday

    Hi,
    SPDD should be performed before ACT_UPG phase when system prompts you for SPDD. But now you cannot do SPDD phase. All the objects that came during SPDD phase has been resetted to new objects which SAP has delivered with EHP4.
    SPAU you can perform after upgrade and that too with in 14 days when upgrade finished without object key.
    I should suggest you to read upgrade guide on http://service.sap.com/erp-ehp.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Short Dump-Syntax error program"CL_RSD_MULTIPROV==CP" after EHP1SP5 upgrade

    Hi,
         MultiProvider Activation/Display data is resulting into short dump with following text
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "CL_RSD_MULTIPROV_CHECK========CP" had to be
    terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    The following syntax error occurred in program
    "CL_RSD_MULTIPROV==============CP " in include
    "CL_RSD_MULTIPROV==============CM010 " in
    line 1:
    "Method "CHECK_LINITFL" is not declared or inherited in class "CL_RSD_M"
    "ULTIPROV". -"
    The include has been created and last changed by:
    Created by: "SAP "
    Last changed by: "SAP "
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "CL_RSD_MULTIPROV_CHECK========CP" had to be
    terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
              We have recently upgraded to EHP1SP5. We noticed this issue just after that.
    Regards,
    PD

    Hi,
    Please check the note 1461401.
    1461401 - System error in the program CL_RSD_MULTIPROV_CHECK
    This note should help you.
    Regards,
    Rafael

  • Syntax error in standard program after upgrade

    Hi,
    After upgrade from 7.0 to 7.3, we are facing a syntax error in standard program that is used in one of our process
    The error says:
    The field "G_REQUIDPARENT" is unknown, but there is a field with the s"
    imilar name "G_REQUID_LAST". "G_REQUID_LAST"."
    The system cannot find this object inside include LRSBM_REQUEST_GUIP04, that belongs to program SAPLRSBM_REQUEST_GUI
    We assume that this is associated with the upgrade but we cannot find any solution in the web. Besides, this is a standard program so we cannot perform any change directly. We look for SAP Notes to apply but we didn't find nothing worthwhile
    Basically, we are receiving a dump with the error message posted above and we found the syntax error, but the thing is that we don't know how to fix it, due to the fact that is a standard program and we cannot change it
    I know that SAP could remove some object reference during the upgrade, but there should be an anticipated plan to fix this kind of errors, right?
    Can you shed some light on this, please ?
    Thanks a lot
    Ale

    Hi Ale,
    If you make sure there are no customization around the object and SGEN already run, I think you can just open a OSS message to SAP to looking for a fix.
    Regards
    Bill

  • I have recently upgraded our Choir's website, using iWeb, (it was previously done using other software. I get the home page on the screen, but when I click on links, I get this error message; "Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /var/www/vir

    I have recently upgraded our Choir's website, and used iWeb to create the upgrade. It was previously done with other software.
    Now, when I go to the site, (comc.ca), the first page comes up fine, but when I click on the links to other pages, I get this message.....
    Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /var/www/virtual/comc.ca/htdocs/Site_3/Contact_Us.html on line 1
    I went to an Apple store, (I still have time left on my one-to-one period), but didn't get an answer.
    Any suggestions really appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Larry

    Sorry, but it doesn't help JTANNA.
    What is your definition of "more efficiently"? If it's limitation of search results, branded search, and limitation of styling your results then google search is more efficient. Real developers rely on their own developments. For example: how can google search display results from a password-protected site? They can't.
    best,
    Shocker

  • Reg syntax error in ECC6.0

    hi,
    Iam getting syantax error for this small code in ECC 6.0.
    plz help in solving this.
    here is the full code.
    DATA: WS-01(1) TYPE C VALUE '1',
    WS-02(1) TYPE C VALUE '2',
    WS-03(1) TYPE C VALUE '3',
    WS-04(1) TYPE C VALUE '4',
    WS-05(1) TYPE C VALUE '5',
    WS-06(1) TYPE C VALUE '6',
    WS-07(1) TYPE C VALUE '7',
    WS-08(1) TYPE C VALUE '8',
    WS-09(1) TYPE C VALUE '9',
    WS-10(1) TYPE C VALUE 'A', "Omit letter 'A'
    WS-10(1) TYPE C VALUE 'B',
    WS-11(1) TYPE C VALUE 'C',
    WS-12(1) TYPE C VALUE 'D',
    WS-14(1) TYPE C VALUE 'E', "Omit letter 'E'
    WS-13(1) TYPE C VALUE 'F',
    WS-14(1) TYPE C VALUE 'G',
    WS-15(1) TYPE C VALUE 'H',
    WS-18(1) TYPE C VALUE 'I', "Omit letter 'I'
    WS-16(1) TYPE C VALUE 'J',
    WS-17(1) TYPE C VALUE 'K',
    WS-18(1) TYPE C VALUE 'L',
    WS-19(1) TYPE C VALUE 'M',
    WS-20(1) TYPE C VALUE 'N',
    O TYPE N VALUE '24', "Omit letter 'O'
    WS-21(1) TYPE C VALUE 'P',
    WS-22(1) TYPE C VALUE 'Q',
    WS-23(1) TYPE C VALUE 'R',
    WS-24(1) TYPE C VALUE 'S',
    WS-25(1) TYPE C VALUE 'T',
    WS-29(1) TYPE C VALUE 'U', "Omit letter 'U'
    WS-26(1) TYPE C VALUE 'V',
    WS-27(1) TYPE C VALUE 'W',
    WS-28(1) TYPE C VALUE 'X',
    WS-29(1) TYPE C VALUE 'Y',
    WS-30(1) TYPE C VALUE 'Z',
    WS-31(1) TYPE C VALUE '0',
    NUM_LENGTH TYPE N VALUE '8'. " Length of stored no.
    DATA : MAX_VAL(2) TYPE N VALUE '31'.
    DATA: BEGIN OF NUM_TAB OCCURS 35,
    CHAR(1) TYPE C,
    VAL LIKE SY-INDEX,
    END OF NUM_TAB.
    initializes internal table with character values from data
    DO MAX_VAL TIMES VARYING CHAR FROM WS-01 NEXT WS-02 .
    MOVE: CHAR TO NUM_TAB-CHAR,
    SY-INDEX TO NUM_TAB-VAL.
    APPEND NUM_TAB.
    ENDDO.
    regards
    vaja

    Hi,
    In unicode field names were not allowed with - symbol
    wa-20 is not allowed
    wa_20 is allowed
    if you use wa-20 you will get syntax errors.
    Regards,
    sivachalasani.

Maybe you are looking for