SYSFAIL in Initial Load of BUPA_MAIN

Hi Colleagues,
We are performing an initial load from a IS-M solution, so we use BUPA_MAIN instead of CUSTOMER_MAIN.
We have some BDocs that present problems in this load, but it has been preventing the queue R3AI_BUPA_MAIN from being processed. It stops with SYSFAIL with message "Error in Mapping: Detais trx. SMW01).
We expected that initial load shouldn't stop at any BDoc with error. We expected that we could just solve those BDocs with trx SMW01.
And there's something else. I've seen in other project that if Middleware detects an error in a BDoc block, it just split the entries with error and process the correct entries. In our case, if one entry is wrong, all entries keep in the BDoc, including those that has no error at all.
Is there normal behaviour or is there a parameter that control its behaviour. In simple words what we need is:
1) BDocs with error are dealt in SMW01 but don't stop the queue, preventing all other BDocs from being processed.
2) A block of BDoc is split when some of its etries have an error, allowing the other entries to be processed.
Best regards,
Renato

Here is the best answer I got:
the u201EError in Mappingu201C issue happens at a very first moment of the data flow when the data is just coming into CRM Middleware and there is still no BDoc created. This happens often when there is a problem, i.e. with the table definition, in transaction /nr3ac1. When you have a single queue handling then this problem will only stop the queue related to this BP. If you have reduced queue names or mass queues it will stop the queues, indeed.
The procedure you are describing regarding the handling of errors (processing the good ones, and keeping the bad ones) is available since CRM 4.0. I do not know a single parameter where you can switch on or off this behavior.
Please have a look for parameter MAX_QUEUE_NUMBER_INITIAL. Hope you will find the correct note.

Similar Messages

Initial Load of BUPA_MAIN to GWA_01 does not work

Hi all
I have a question concerning the serverside groupware Integration and the initial Load of BUPA_MAIN.
According to the groupware integration guide, I have to "Transfer Business Partner to Public Contact Directory".
This is done with transaction R3AS (Object BUPA_Main, Sender=CRM, Receiver=GWA_01 (the mBDOC site)).
When I want to chose the above options in R3AS I cannot select GWA_01 as receiver site (only CRM or OLTP is offered when I click F4). That means when I chose BUPA_MAIN as object I cannot chose GWA_01 as receiver site (fbut or other objects f.ex. GWA_* I can chose GWA_01 as receiver site).
I created all subsriptions needed (I had to recreate the publication "ALL Business Partners (MESG)" because it was missing in my system).
Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong?
Thanks in advance and Regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
Thank you for the reply.
The below steps i followed to customize Groupware Adapter. Please correct me if i went Wrong
     1) Generated Functions and Services for BDoc Types
2) Generated Replication Services
3) Generated R/3 Adapter Services
      4) Created Sites for Groupware Adapter
                    Name
     Groupware adapter 01 (mBDoc)
     Groupware Adapter 02 (sBDoc)
      5) Created Subscriptions for the Groupware Adapter
6) Enabled the Transfer of Business Partners to the Private Contact Folders.
7) Enabling the Transfer of Attachments from CRM to Groupware
                  TBD
      8) Prepared for Customizing Download
9) Loading the Customizing Objects to Groupware
       Note : TBD
10) Loading Business Partners to Groupware
Note : TBD
      11) Customizing Activities for Groupware Integration in IMG
Defined RFC Destination for the MapBox
Defined Internal SyncPoint Settings
Delete Timed Out Sessions from Status Table
           Maintained Application Scenarios
           Maintained vCard Properties
           Maintained vCard Sub-Properties
            Maintained iCalendar Priorities
            Maintained Groupware Adapter Properties
            Maintained General Groupware Settings
            Maintained Groupware Object Selection Fields
            Maintained Groupware Object Selection and Retrieval
            Maintained Groupware Object Master Category List
      12) Application-Specific IMG Views for Groupware Integration
             Maintained Business Partner Properties
             Maintained Business Partner Sub-Properties
             Mapped CRM Business Partner Properties to vCard Properties
             Mapped iCalendar Priorities and SAP Application Priorities
   Filter Condition for Business Partners Exchange with Groupware
      13) Activity Management -Specific IMG Views for Groupware Integration
Maped Activity Status to Groupwar
             Maped Task Status to Groupware
             Maped Activity Text Types and Business Partners to Groupware
All the above steps from 11 to 13,all the default entries were reentered starting with Z,is this ok.
Please let me now whether the above steps on customizing the Groupware Adapter which i followed are enough or i need to do any additional customization.
As we are using two sites, let me know how can i define RFC Destination for the MapBox.
How I can check whether ABAP MAPBOX is having the RFC Connection and it is activated.
Thanks & Regards
Pranav

Initial Load ISU / CRM Issues

Hi all
I have a few questions.
1. When you start an initial load for BUPA_MAIN in R3AS (from ISU to CRM) it seems only 1 DIAG WP is used (SM50). Is this normal?
2. In R3AM1 you can monitor the objects. Everything seems to be loaded but yet the status is still 'Running', is this because of BDoc validation errors?
Kind regards
Lucas

Hello Lucas,
There's a param(CRM_MAX_QUEUE_NUMBER_INITIAL) you can maintain in the table CRMPAROLTP of the source system(maintain this in the ERP system if you're doing an initial load from ERP to CRM)
Reference Notes:
350176
765236
The parval1 for Parameter CRM_MAX_QUEUE_NUMBER_INITIAL should be an integer(lets say 5) instead of a character 'X'. In such a case 5 queues would be formed for initial load.
Here's an example :
Parameter name CRM_MAX_QUEUE_NUMBER_INITIAL
Param. Name 2 <Object name> " for example CUSTOMER_MAIN
Param. Name 3
User <User> " for example CRM, if CRM is connected
Param. Value <no. of queues> " for example 5
Param. Value 2
So using the example above 5 R3AI_CUSTOMER_MAIN queues would be formed on the ERP and sent to CRM for processing.
The no. of available dialog work processes in SM51 available to the qRFC scheduler in CRM system should be able to handle the parallel processing of queues. So consult your basis administrators on this front.
Regards,
Rohit

Sysfail error during initial load

Got sysfail error. Checked for shortdumps and found this
MESSAGE_TYPE_X     SAPLCRMO
'No external system (such as CRM) connected'
Checked the RFC. Seems ok. Any idea?
Get the parameters for the RFC conection.
    c_stshd-mass_queue = c_stshd-mass_data.
    PERFORM get_download_params_and_queue
            TABLES t_bapistructures
            USING c_stshd-objname
                  c_stshd-objclass
                  gv_destination
                  gv_rfc_queue
                  gv_server_release
                  i_bapicrmdh2
                  c_stshd-mass_queue
                  c_stshd
                  i_transfer_data
                  i_crmrfcpar
                  e_rfcoltp.
Set variables
    e_synchronous_call = gv_synchronous_call.
Raise an error if the destination of the foreign system could not be
found. (Only during Initial Load, Upload, Compare and Requests).
    IF gt_rfcdest[] IS INITIAL AND
       NOT i_bapicrmdh2-ref_id IS INITIAL.
      MESSAGE x050(c_) WITH
              'No external system (such as CRM) connected'(007).
    ELSE.
      t_rfcdest[] = gt_rfcdest[].
    ENDIF.

The RFC Destination for Replication & Realignment (Clt 000) isn't set because only the root admin has access to clnt000 and he's in vacation. Could that be the problem?

No initial load of Customers, Material and delta load of Sales Orders.

Hi Experts,
I am facing a very troublesome issue. I am not able to setup the Middleware portion for initial and delta loads. I read a lot of documents and corrected a lot of things. finally, the connectivity is done with R/3 and CRM. Initial load of all objects is successful (as per Best PRactices guide). Customizing load is successful.
But after now I have these open issues for which I am unable to find any answers (am really exhausted!!):
- Customer_main load, it was succesful, but no BP's of R/3 are available.
- Material, it failed in SMW01, SMQ2, the errors are:
Mat. for Initial Download: Function table not supported
EAN xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
EAN yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
Plant xx is not assigned to a business partner
- Sales order, it shows green bdoc, but error segments says "No upload to R/3" and the order does not flow to R/3.
We had our system setup 3 years back for data transfer and Middleware. But few things changed and connectivity stopped. I did all that again now, but am not yet successful. Any inputs will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Pat

Hi Ashvin,
The error messages in SMW01 for MAterial initial load is :
     Mat. for Initial Download: Function table not supported
     EAN 123456789000562 does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
     EAN 900033056531434 does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
     Plant 21 is not assigned to a business partner
I have done the DNL_PLANT load successfully. Why then the plant error?
Some of the messages for BP:
Messages for business partner 1331:
No classification is assigned to business partner 1331
For another,
     Partner 00001872(469206A60E5F61C6E10000009F70045E): the following errors occurred
     City Atlanta does not exist in country US
     Time zone EST_NA does not exist
     You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US
     Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.
Now, the time zone EST is assigned by default in R/3. Where do I change that? I do not want to change time zones as this may have other impacts. Maybe CRM I cna change this, not for sure in R/3. City check has been deactivated in R/3 and CRM, still the error.
Till these 2 are not solved, I cannot go into the Sales order loads.
Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Pat

Error while Initial load

Hi Forum,
Iam doing Middleware setup for downloading customer master from R/3 to CRM.Iam trying to do initial load of customizing objects viz.,DNL_CUST_ACGRPB,DNL_CUST_ADDR,
DNL_CUST_KTOKD,DNL_CUST_TVKN,DNL_CUST_TVLS,DNL_CUST_TVPV... which are to be loaded before doing initial load of CUSTOMER_MAIN.
while doing initial load of customizing objects iam getting the below mentioned error
001 No generation performed. Call transaction GN_START.
002 Due to system errors the Load is prohibited (check transaction MW_CHECK)!
-when I do GN_START
"A job is already scheduled periodically.
Clicking on 'Continue' will create another job
that starts immediately.
Do you want to continue?" message is displayed
and I have sheduled it.
But in SMWP transaction I can see in
BDoc Types: Generation of other runtime objects
Not generated / generated with errors 2 entries
 31.08.2006 05:33:50
and the objects with errors are
POT_LISTWRITE
SPE_DDIC_WRITE
-In transaction MW_CHECK, system displays message as No generation performed. Call transaction GN_START.
when I regenerate these objects(generated with errors)from the context menu I find no difference.
I have also referred to the Note :637836 and 661067 which also suggests to run few reports and GN_START but inspite of doing all the corretion parameters in the note Iam still unable to come out of the situation.
Please Guide
Thanks in Advance
Shridhar.
Message was edited by: Shridhar Deshpande

Hi Rahul,
Thanks for the reply.I checked in transaction MW_CHECK and the system throws the message as
No generation performed. Call transaction GN_START.
In the long text the below message is available
No generation performed. Call transaction GN_START.
Message no. SMW_GEN_KERNEL005
Diagnosis
An upgrade was performed.
System response
The Middleware is stopped because MW objects must be generated.
Procedure
Excecute transaction GN_START.
If GN_START is executed,I dont find any change.
I also checked in smq2in CRM and I found the status of the queue as below
 CL Queue Name Entries Status Date
200 CSABUPA0000000042 5 SYSFAIL 31.08.2006 09:54:05 31.08.2006 09:54:11
Thanks
Shridhar
Message was edited by: Shridhar Deshpande

Initial Load of IS-U business partners to CRM - wrong business partner cat

Hi Gurus,
when donwloading CUSTOMER_MAIN from R/3 to CRM
Where is determined that the business partner in CRM should be created in the business partner category 'Person'?
We have the problem that all our business partners in CRM are now 'Organizations' (but were sold-to-parties in R/3 with account group DEBI)
PIDE - setting is:
R/3 account group DEBI ---> classisifaction 'B' ('Customer')
In the customizing of the business partner roles for the role type CRM000 (and for all the others) Organization, Person and Group is all allowed by default.
The download itself and the number ranges work fine.

The reason for the problem is unknown but a workaround is to first initial load BUPA_MAIN instead of CUSTOMER_MAIN, then the right business partner category is taken by the system

Initial Load of Business Partner not running

Dear SAP CRM gurus,
We have been able to perform initial download of Business Partners from ECC into our CRM system. We have done this many times. We do not know what is wrong, but since last week, we are unable to perform initial download of our Business Partners. When we run initial download using R3AS, there is no BDoc created, there is also no queues on inbound/outbound of both CRM and ECC system. There is also no error. R3AM1 showing initial download complete but only with 1 block. But there is no BDoc created!! All other replication objects are fine, except that BUPA_MAIN we are unable to perform initial download. Delta download is fine as well.
We have not changed anything on SMOEAC and it is all correct. Entries on CRMSUBTAB and CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU is also correct.
Please help!!

Hi,
When you are downloading CUSTOMER_MAIN through R3AS are u getting any warning or error??
or r u getting pop up with green light??
If u are getting any warning or error then go to tcode: smwp. Then go to runtime information
->Adapter Status Information>Initial Load Status
under that check running objects and check customer_main is there or not??
if found delete that entry and do initial load again.
Also check outbound queue of R/3 and inbound queue of CRM .
If then also its not working do request download using r3ar2, r3ar3 and r3ar4 and check whether it is working or not.
If helpful kindly reward me.
Thanks & Regards,
Anirban

Initial Load of BUAG_MAIN (Business Agreements) IS-U = CRM

Hello. We are integrating ISU to SAP CRM 7.0.
We have been replicating Business Partners between the two systems for a couple of years, and now wish to begin replication the Business Agreements <=> Contract acconts objects (BUAG_MAIN)
In our development system, in order to successfully process the initial load of BUAG_MAIN, I had to RE-run an inital load of BUPA_MAIN. I am really unconfortable having to do this in our productive systems!
My question to you experts:
Is there a way to run an initial load of a dependent object (BUAG_MAIN) without having to re-run an initial load of the parent object? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Hello Pratik,
- There are no dumps in ST22
- There are no errors in SMW01
- No. range settings are set as following:
CRM: Master Data-> Business Agreement-> Define Number Range for Business Agreement:
No. From number To number Ext.
01 000100000000 000199999999 X
02 000200000000 000299999999
ERP/IS-U: Financial Accounting (New)-> Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable-> Basic Functions->Contract Accounts->Number Ranges and Contract Account Categories
No. From number To number Ext.
01 000100000000 000199999999
02 000200000000 000299999999 X
But before inital download we have set all no. ranges to External as prescribed in the set-up and load guide for business agreements and contract accounts.
(There is just one Business Agreement Class and one contract account category)
Hope to hear from you soon.
Kind Regards
Saima

Error in DNL_CUST_PROD1 Initial Load

While attempting to carry out the initial load for object (DNL_CUST_PROD1) from R/3 to CRM an inbound queue is generated with status SYSFAIL containing the following error message:
It is not posible to import material type to hierarchy ZBP_CRM_PT....
(Message no. SR053)
The Hierarchy mentioned in the message refers to one that was created manually in CRM before the initial load.
It was under my understanding that the only hierarchy impacted by the initial load was the R3MATCLASS, then why is this error generated for another hierarchy that should not be involved?
Regarding this issue I feel I have two options:
1. Delete the hierarchy in CRM and restart the initial load. (The only problem here is that I have found it really dificult to carry out the deletion, because it means I have to delete products and IObjects created in CRM that are associated to this hierarchy)
2. Try to find a way to prevent error to appear in the inbound queue. (for example in debugging try to bypass the logic that processes the manually created hierarchy)
Please I would greatly appreciate to get an answer from anyone that has encounterd similar problems.
Thanks in advance,
Pedro

Dear Efrain Pacheco
Just have a look into the corresponding entry in ST22 .
The problem persists due to the duplicate entries in the table T023 or .
Delete them directly from the table using se16:
Select the entries in the classic view (not ALV or grid view). activate the debugger.
Press the view button. --> you'll enter in the debugger
Press F7
Locate the sy-ucomm variable & change it to "DELE".
Press F8
Delete the entries.
Trick-shots but it works!
Let me know in case of any persistent problems .
 Note: Reward points if it helps
Thanks & Regards
Jaman

'User is Locked' error while trying to start initial load

While trying to start initial load of objects using R3AS, I am receiving error msg 'User is locked'. This rfc user is a dialog user with SAP_ALL. I even tried replicating using a new user, but ended up with same error. The user is not locked but still getting the same error msg via status 'SYSFAIL' in the queue. Any suggestions?
Thnx,
- AJ.

AJ,
The RFC user must be a communication user or a system user. I think you mentioned the RFC user is a dialog user, which would be wrong settings definitely.
Also as mentioned by Marcin, ensure the passwords in the RFC destination of SRM and R/3 are the same as the passwords in SU01 of the respective systems. To ensure this, click on remote logon for the RFC destination in SM59. If the screen doesnot change, this means your systems are connecting through the RFC user without any problem.
Please assign points, if answer is usefull !!
Sundeep

Initial load of sales orders from R3 to CRM without statuses

1) Some sales orders were uploaded into CRM without statuses in the headers or line items.
2) Some sales orders were uploaded without status, ship-to, sold-to, payer.....If I deleted them and use R3AR2, R3AR4 to upload each individual then no problem.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks.

Hi,
   Request load of adapter objects uses different extractor modules for extracting the data from external system to CRM. While your initial load of sales docs. will use a different extraction logic bases on the filter conditions specfied on trx.
R3AC1
   There may be a problem in the extraction of data from the source system (don't know if you are using a R/3). Can you please de-register the R/3 (i suppose) outbound queue using trx.
SMQS
, and then debug the extraction (R/3 outbound) before the data is sent to CRM using FM
CRS_SEND_TO_SERVER
   If this goes well, you may try debugging the mapper in CRM inbound and the validation module in CRM as a last resort. Also, please refer to trx.
SMW01
to see if the Bdocs are fully processed.
Hope this helps...Reward if helpful.
Regards,
Sudipta.

After Upgrade BI Initial load is taking much time

Dear Friends,
We had BW 3.5 on Windows 2003(32 bit) & SQL 2000.
I upgraded it to BI 7.01 (EHP1 SR1) with Windows 2003(64bit),SQL 2005 & completed all followup activities.
Now when we are doing initial load it is taking long time. Please do let me know your inputs as soon as possible.
Regards,
Sunil Maurya.

Hi ,
I created the thread under netweaver forum.
But still I'll check & try create it in correct forum.
Regards,
Sunil Maurya

MacBook Pro (mid 2010) - Slow Startup and Initial Load of Apps after Mavericks Install

Hello everyone,
Long time Snow Leopard user here. I've been absolutely, 100% thrilled with my MBP's performance / speed since mid 2010. Since installing Mavericks I've noticed two things:
1. Initial on boot load times seem much slower
2. The first time you open an app (Safari, even TextEdit) is far slower than in Snow Leopard.
Now granted, once the computer has been on for about 5 minutes, and once you've had an application open for 1-2 minutes, than performance is okay once again. But it seems that quite literally everytime you do "anything" for the first time since the computer has been turned on you run the risk of a spinning beachball and an extended wait. This simply never happened in Snow Leopard.
I'm not a computer science major but I do understand that when you do something for the first time since a reboot it will need to load new files into the RAM which takes time. However, I've been using this computer since 2010 and have never experienced this behavior / speed / delay, etc... something seems fundamentally different.
For example, even just opening finder, and navigating to the Applications folder results in sluggish behavior the first time. Also, anytime you first click the top menu bar in an application you run the risk of a beachball.
It doesn't seem like a failing hard drive because I can read/write large chunks of data one an app is finally loaded. It's just initially loading the app takes quite literally 10-20 times longer than Snow Leopard. It seems like perhaps Mavericks itself, the core of the new OS was perhaps installed in a bad sector of the HD, but none of my other files are on bad sectors... if that makes sense. Again - I'm not a computer science major so I'm largely just making things up
It also seems as if multitasking and switching between several open apps has seen a decrease in performance. Could it be that perhaps Mavericks RAM management is superior to Snow Leopard, but only if there is a TON of RAM to go around? Could it be as simple as Macs with only 4GB installed should not be allowed to even install Mavericks?
Does this sound normal for Mavericks considering I have a C2D processor, a non SSD, and only 4GB ram? I know those specs are "outdated" for 2014, but keep in mind these were the specs that I've always had and with Snow Leoapard I was consistently thrilled with the speed of the computer.
I suppose my question is: should my strategy be to simply turn the computer on, get a cup of coffee and let everything load and maybe even have my frequently used apps load on startup, etc... and carry on as normal? Does something seem off? Should I invest in a new SSD / RAM upgrade? I know the upgrades couldn't hurt, but the issue is that I was perfectly content until upgrading to Mavericks
I've tried booting into OS X Recovery mode and using the Disk Utility. I've tried Safe Mode. I've included a "EtreCheck" report below. I'm open to any ideas / suggestions.
Thanks!!
Hardware Information:
 MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2010)
 MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro7,1
 1 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2 cores
 4 GB RAM
Video Information:
 NVIDIA GeForce 320M - VRAM: 256 MB
System Software:
 OS X 10.9.1 (13B42) - Uptime: 0 days 0:10:48
Disk Information:
 Hitachi HTS545025B9SA02 disk0 : (250.06 GB)
 EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
 Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 249.2 GB (228.46 GB free)
 Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
 MATSHITADVD-R UJ-898
USB Information:
 Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
 Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub
 Logitech USB Receiver
 Apple Inc. Apple Keyboard
 Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
 Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
 Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
 Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
 Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
FireWire Information:
Thunderbolt Information:
Launch Daemons:
 [System] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist 3rd-Party support link
Launch Agents:
 [System] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist 3rd-Party support link
 [System] com.adobe.AdobeCreativeCloud.plist 3rd-Party support link
User Launch Agents:
 [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist 3rd-Party support link
 [not loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
User Login Items:
 None
Internet Plug-ins:
 FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 11.9.900.152 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
 Flash Player: Version: 11.9.900.152 - SDK 10.6 Outdated! Update
 QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
 JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Outdated! Update
 AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 2.0.0.0 - SDK 10.7 3rd-Party support link
 Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
Audio Plug-ins:
 BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
 AirPlay: Version: 1.9 - SDK 10.9
 AppleAVBAudio: Version: 2.0.0 - SDK 10.9
 iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
iTunes Plug-ins:
 Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
3rd Party Preference Panes:
 Flash Player 3rd-Party support link
Old Applications:
 None
Time Machine:
 Time Machine not configured!
Top Processes by CPU:
 4% WindowServer
 1% EtreCheck
 0% mds
 0% mds_stores
 0% airportd
Top Processes by Memory:
 111 MB com.apple.IconServicesAgent
 94 MB Finder
 57 MB Dock
 53 MB SystemUIServer
 53 MB EtreCheck
Virtual Memory Information:
 1.64 GB Free RAM
 1.42 GB Active RAM
 314 MB Inactive RAM
 390 MB Wired RAM
 316 MB Page-ins
 0 B Page-outs

Wish I could be of some help, but I'm having similar issues on my mid 2011 macbook pro with 8 GB ram. It's very frustrating. I haven't worked on a computer this slow since the early 90's. Even simple things like signing in to this site bring up the beach ball for maybe ten seconds. When opening up apps I often have to wait minutes, and often end up force quitting when they hang. I'm using force quit a dozen or more times a day, when it used to be very rare.
I don't know if it's Mavericks. I installed a new hard drive in November, but the problems really started getting bad since the latest upgrade.
It's not just opening apps. If I have an app open in the background and switch to it I have similar issues. Watching a simple video is often accompanied by stalls and delays - which is really bad as I'm often using the laptop to edit video. It's become unuseable for work.
Perhaps the most frustrating is clicking on a link, only to find Safari decides to complete a previous scroll that it had paused. The page jumps down, and sometimes I end up clicking on a link I didn't want. Then I have to wait for THAT spinning beach ball before I can go back to the previous spinning beach ball.
It can take up to ten minutes to restart. I've tried everything I could find on these pages so far, and nothing has worked.
I thought maybe it was something I've done (and perhaps it is), but I keep seeing others with similar issues.

How to use more than one application server during initial load?

Hi,
we plan to use more than one application server in CRM during initial download in order to increase the number of parallel requests and to decrease the time for the initial load. Is there a way to allocate requests to more than one server? Is is possible via multiple rfc connections for consumer CRM in CRMRFCPAR?
Thanks.
Alexander Schiffer

Hi Naresh,
thanks for your answer. It has solved my problem. SMLG is the transaction that I was looking for.
Two more OSS notes that helped me to guide our basis into the right direction:
OSS 593058 - New RFC load balancing procedure
OSS 1413986 - SMLG: Possibility to select a favorite type for Ext.RFCs
Thanks again.
Alexander Schiffer

SYSFAIL in Initial Load of BUPA_MAIN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for