SYST : Abnormal termaination (ANLB -LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR)

Hello all,
i am getting the following error, when i am trying to post the park document.
Message no : AA698
system response
internal tables ANLB -LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR of asset not synchnorize.
i have checked the tables for these.
Displayed Fields:   4 of   4        Fixed Columns:
For table ANLB
   Client Company Code Asset          Last fiscal yr.
   360    0396         008000000005   2013
   360    0396         008000000005   2013
For table ANLC
isplayed Fields:   4 of   4        Fixed Columns:
Client Company Code Asset          Fiscal Year
360    0396         008000000005   2009
360    0396         008000000005   2009
360    0396         008000000005   2010
360    0396         008000000005   2010
360    0396         008000000005   2011
360    0396         008000000005   2011
360    0396         008000000005   2012
360    0396         008000000005   2012
360    0396         008000000005   2013
360    0396         008000000005   2013
Table T093c
Client Company Code Current FYear
360    0396         2014
i guess in table T093c fiscal year is 2014 and the assets are in 2013. so we need to do AJRW( transfer of assets to another fiscal year).
but when i checked with the enduser, they have already run this programe.
please give you suggestions on this .
Thanks & Regards
Mahender.

Hi...
could you please check 1531737 - Error AA698 - Possible causes and resolutions
It might give you a good startup point for the resolution...
Cheers
Panagiotis

Similar Messages

SYST: Abnormal termination (ANLB-LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR)

Hi All
An asset got scrapped in 2009 and having an unplanned depn value for $100 which resultedi n negative NBV of -100.
This is impact closing of 2009 and opening 2011,
I am trying to post Manual depn (TT 640) in dec 2010 dated, but getting below error :
"SYST: Abnormal termination (ANLB-LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR) Asset NL010000002004510000
Internal tables ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR of asset NL010000002004510000 are not synchronous
I checked SDN and below listed message is similar to my error, but i am not able to understand much of the below message, m y understanding is there is no FY 2010 in table ANLC which is causing this error.
Could clarify on what steps needs to be done ?
How to syncronize ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR

Hi Aravind,
most of the time it is one of the following reasons from the link you have found.
another link with examples: Error AS02 AA 698 - SYST: Abnormal termination (T_ANLB not equal to T_ANLC)
1) Are the table fields T093C-LGJAHR, ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR in line
Example for a inconsistency:
T093C-LGJAHR: 2010
ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR: 2009
Solution: Repeat fiscal year change
2) Is table-field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY on 0 instead on 2
Example:
MANDT FIAA_VIEW AFAPL AFABER AUTHORITY
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 01..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 02 ..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 15..... . 2
100 ..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 20..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 30 ..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 34..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 35..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 37..... . 0 set to 2
Solution:
In note 900767 you find the report RACORR_VIEW0_SET to correct this.
3) Have ANLB and ANLC the same number of areas
Example:
ANLB has areas 01, 02, 03.
ANLB has areas 01, 02, 03 and 10
Solution in that case would be not that easy
regards Bernhard

Abnormal Termination (ANLB-LGJAN 1 not equal to ANLC-GJAHR 2) Asset 1000000

Hi,
While we are doing MIGO, we are getting an error message - SYST: Abnormal Termination (ANLB-LGJAN 1 not equal to ANLC-GJAHR 2) Asset 10000000007003170000
also getting same error in ML81N..
Please guide..

Hi Anil,
Please check table ANLC-GJAHR, ANLB-LGJAN and T093C-LGJAHR.
The latest value in these 3 fields should be consistent, which means they are in the current fiscal year.
If they are inconsistent (usually ANLC/ANLB < T093C) please run fiscal year change to correct.
- RAJAWE00: fiscal year change (T-cd:AJRW)
I hope that this resolves your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Error in AS91: E698 SYST: Abnormal termination

Hi,
I am getting a error while creating legacy asset in AS91.
E698 SYST: Abnormal termination (ANLB-LGJAN 1 not equal to ANLC-GJAHR),
I guess this error relates to fiscal year., my closed fiscal year is 2008 (from OAAQ),
and the take over date is 01.04.2008.
If i have to transfer all assets as of 31.03.2008 into sap system, what should be my
transfer date? and which fiscal year should be open?
Regards,
Khan

Hi Khan,
In addition, to the already made points maybe you can also check the following:
Also, is the actual system date in the same year as your last open fiscal year in FI-AA?
(e.g. last open fiscal year in T093C-LGJAHR is 2009 but actual system date is in year 2010).
In this case you should start the fiscal year change report (RAJAWE00) to open F.Y. 2010 to avoid the error.
For error AA698 not to appear you should close the fiscal years for which ANLC records do not exist.
Regards,
Brigitte

SYST: Abnormal termination (T_ANLB not equal to T_ANLC)

Dear All,
I have seen that this topic has already discussed here for several times but i could not find my case.
When I try to change fiscal year, I get error message that some assets are not complete. I try to change the asset from as02 but I get the following error :
SYST: Abnormal termination (T_ANLB not equal to T_ANLC)
Message no. AA698
Internal tables T_ANLB and T_ANLC of asset are not synchronous.
When I analysed table ANLC I saw that expired useful life is filled with values, but I can not see these values in AS02. Maybe this is the cause for problem but I could not find a solution yet.
I also checked fiscal years in these tables but they are the same.
Does anybody encountered and solved this kind of problem?
Best regards

Hi,
I might ask you to check if the following link is useful for you.
Error AS02 AA 698 - SYST: Abnormal termination ... | SCN
best regards Bernhard

Is not equal to operator not working properly in obiee 11g

Hi ,
I have 5 members in a dimesion ENTITY.gen5 (A,B,C,D,E) .
nOW , I am using a *"is equal to "* operator in that ,
ENTITY.gen5 = A;B .
Which results in a strange error while running the report :
Socket communication error : was attempted on somthing which is not socket .
or sometimes ,
Socket communication error : Oracle BI server is not currently running .
So , I tried with giving "is not equal to" i.e . ENTITY.gen5 != C;D;E .
Then , I am getting A,B,C . C is not desired here .
FYI , I have renamed ENTITY.gen5 member names in essbase once and after refreshing I tried the above .
OBIEE version : 11.1.1.6
essbase version : 11.1.2.1
Thanks in advance

In EM, go to Weblogic Domain, right click on bifoundation_domain and on the Security menu choose Application Policies.
Set Application Stripe to obi and click the blue arrow search button.
Highlight BIConsumer and click Edit.
Under Permissions locate Resource Name oracle.bi.publisher.scheduleReport. Highlight this and click Delete...
Click OK (top right corner).
Now log your user out of OBIEE and back in again, and the option should have disappeared from their New menu.

Not Equals Function is not working in Mapping

Hi All,
i have to do mappig based on the Not Equals & And conditions
If the Material Group starts with "F"
                        And Material Type Not Equals to "ZPRO" means
                                    then send "FG" Else "FC"
Here Not Equals & And Functions are not giving success, Error throwing like
Cannot cast ZPRO to boolean] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.Bool method not[ZPRO
Please help in this
Regards

i have to do mappig based on the Not Equals & And conditions
If the Material Group starts with "F"
And Material Type Not Equals to "ZPRO" means
then send "FG" Else "FC"
Here Not Equals & And Functions are not giving success, Error throwing like
Cannot cast ZPRO to boolean] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.Bool method not[ZPRO
the logic applied is incorrect
NotEquals is a boolean function meaning it will accept only boolean values as input....
To check if the Material Number is ZPRO or not use the below logic
MaterialNumber                                            Then(FG)
                      ------equalS(TextFunction) ---- not -----ifWithElse ------------------ Target
Constant (ZPRO)                                                   Else(FC)
Regards,
Abhishek.

HOW TO BLOCK DELIVERY OF GOODS WHICH ARE NOT EQUAL TO SALES ORDER

Hi,
I want to block user to create any sales invoice for some customers based on sales order where quantity in sales order is not equal to invoice.
Thanks,
Anitha

Hi Anitha,
You can do this by selecting check marks on two field under BP Master data >>Payment Terms
1) Allow Partial Delivery of Sales Order
2) Allow Partial Delivery per row.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sudhir

Is BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE(manual) creation?

Hi Experts,
Ours is IS-Oil.
If the user do not enters/inputs OIC_MOT (Mode Of Transport) at ITEM level on the External Details popup, SAP will get it from Customar Master-KNA1 and populates on it, because its a mandatory field (OIC_MOT), but, do not throws an Error message and interupts the sales order creation process.
We have a inbound IDOC posting function module for sales order (VA01), which posts the sales oreders by using BDC (CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01') in the system. In this function module, we are not populating the OIC_MOT field contained segment by hoping SAP will populate/default it while it hits CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' of my BDC of my FM of IB IDOC. But, SAP is not defaulting/populating and throwing error message (saying 'OIC_MOT field is a mandatory input field' data is missing) and IDOC is failing, pls. let me know Wht its so? is the BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE (manual ) creation of sales order?
Thank you

Hi
Several transactions can ba a different behavior between online and bdc process, but if you simulate the trx by SM35 you should find out these gaps
I don't know OIL vertical, but the main transactions have a bapi can be used insted of BDC program (BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2, but perhaps there's a particular BAPI for OIL).
Max

Not Equal to Clause in BODS

Hello Experts -
I need to put this condition in transformation in BODS table1.col 1 Not Equal to table2.col2 .
I am not able to find NOT EQUAL TO clause in BODS. I have used != , But not working.
However equal to (=) is working fine.
Any suggestion how I can use not equal to ? (I want it in Where Tab)
Thanks
R

Rohan, please pull/drag your columns into where clause. do not simply write them. and for your condition chk it with " <> " .
hth
thx
deep

Succession of TaskSelectionEvent.getTaskIds is not equal to user selection

Dear all,
My configuration is JDev 11g R1 (11.1.1.4.0) and I'm currently working at ADF DVT Project Gantts.
At the moment a problem occurs within the TaskSelectionEvent: The order of the task Ids coming back from TaskSelectionEvent.getTaskIds are not equal to the order of my selection. I 'm selecting first task A and then task B. The method give back [B, A].
The code snippets based on the Oracle ADF faces demo:
JSP:
<dvt:projectGantt id="mygantt" startTime="2008-01-01"
endTime="2011-12-31" var="task"
value="#{PG.model}"
tooltipKeys="#{PG.tooltipKeys}"
tooltipKeyLabels="#{PG.tooltipLabels}"
dataChangeListener="#{PG.handleDataChanged}"
actionListener="#{PG.handleAction}"
partialTriggers="ctb2"
taskSelectionListener="{PG.handleSelectedTask}">
</dvt:projectGantt>
Java:
private List selectedTaskIds;
public void handleSelectedTask(TaskSelectionEvent evt)
selectedTaskIds = evt.getTaskIds();
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Tom

For the use case where tasks need to be linked (user clicks the "Link" icon in toolbar after selecting tasks), getTaskIds() in handleDataChanged() would return ids in the order tasks were selected.

OBIEE Answe: Error when using "is not equal to/is not in" option in filters

Hi there,
I have a report with a column that uses EVALUATE function. I want to filter the results of the report by the values of this column. There's no problem when I use "is equal to/is in" option in the filter options. However with everything the same, when I try to apply "is not equal to/is not in" option I got an error message reading :
"Error Codes: YQCO4T56:OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value @{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]} from @{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]} does not match the specified format. (HY000)"
The column is the following funciton:
CAST(EVALUATE('pob.Get_PP_Status(%1, %2)',"ПРЕПИСКА".PP_ID, DATE '@{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]}' ) AS CHAR(500))
Do you any ideas where the problem might be?
Kind regards,
Danail

Thru note 1909504 the Function Module FI_TAX_CALCULATION was changed and caused the error on the system of my customer.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Udo

Unable to Create "Not Equal to" condition in Variable creation

Hi ,
I am getting an error while creating variable at report level,
Well, my condition at variable creation is ----> sum(A) where [country] <> " x" ...(It is showing the results when the country is equal to x) and the converse for the same ... If I use [country] = "x" .. It is taking as country not equal to x ..
Please suggest me on this..
Thanks in advance ....

Hi ,
I am getting an error while creating variable at report level,
Well, my condition at variable creation is ----> sum(A) where [country] <> " x" ...(It is showing the results when the country is equal to x) and the converse for the same ... If I use [country] = "x" .. It is taking as country not equal to x ..
Please suggest me on this..
Thanks in advance ....

Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)

Dear Gurus,
Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
"Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
Regards,
Sam Ahmed
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your post

Here is the pricing procedure,
We start with the amount condition types
                                        Unit Price        Units Condition Value
ZMRP     MRP                     1,700.00           10     PAC     55,080.00
ZTRP     Trade Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00
ZDPR     Dist. Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00         (GL)
Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
ZPRD     Product Discount     23.000-     %                    10,768.14-
Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
ZDIS      Discount Value     100.000-     %           10,768.14-      (GL)
tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS 36,049.86      as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
     Order Item value     111.27      1     PAC     36,049.86
And the Net Price is 111.27

In a purchase order for 3 GR's Quantity does not equal the value

Hi,
I have found the difference in one purchase order, there have been 3 GRs where the Qty does not equal the Value. How has this happened?
Any guesses why the difference has come.
Thanks&regards,
Veena

Hi Vishal,
In po history for agt 3 Gr's Quantity does not equal the values. I hope the difference is Movement types. But exactly where to check this movements i am not getting.
Can you tell me this which T.code.
Tx,

SYST : Abnormal termaination (ANLB -LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for