System 9.3 Solaris 10-64 bit Vs 32Bit

Hi All For a same Essbase configuration and server/job setup, is their anybench mark that one could provide for 32bit Vs 64bit? We areplanning to upgrade to System 9.3 starting next month and wouldappreciate if somebody could help us in recommend whether 62bitSolaris10 is better than 32bit Solaris10. Thanks

That's a good question. I'm not an Oracle representative, but I think in general detailed informations given to the customer through metalink have to be kept 'confidential'. Oracle won't like it, one customer pays for his support contract and happy others (not paying) read the informations on OTN. It's not a problem to say 'You find more informations in metalink note xxx', because in this case the reader still needs a valid access to metalink.
Werner

Similar Messages

Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit on Solaris 8 64-bit ( boot-mode)

Hi:
i have questions :
I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit product, i'll need run on solaris 8
( 64-bit boot-mode ) .
Is there Problems wiht that???
My hardware is :
Sun Microsystems sun4u
Sun Enterprise 420R (2 X UltraSPARC-II 450MHz)
System clock frequency: 113 MHz
Memory size: 2048 Megabytes
========================= CPUs =========================
Run Ecache CPU CPU
Brd CPU Module MHz MB Impl. Mask
0 1 1 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
0 2 2 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
mymachine#isainfo -v
64-bit sparcv9 applications
32-bit sparc applications
thanks ...
Alex ...

Hi Anthony :
Do you know something about performace between
Tuxedo 32-bit and Tuxedo 64-bit ?
Thanks ...
Alex ...
Do you working in Bea or other Enterprise ??
"Anthony Fryer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi Alex, we are also using tuxedo 32-bit on Solaris 64-bit operating
system. There
is no problem doing this as your solaris version supports both 32 bit
and 64 bit
programs. The things to watch out for are when you are building a tuxedo
application,
you have to make sure that all the libraries you link with are also 32
bit libraries,
including oracle. We ran into build problems when some libraries were
32 bit
and others were 64 bit.
There's good information about 32bit v 64bit on solaris at the following
web site...
http://docs.sun.com/?p=/doc/806-6543/6jffrdmee&a=view
I personally would use 64bit if possible, but it's no big deal to build
32 bit
applications because my tuxedo application does not need a 64bit address
space
and is not computationally heavy. Most of the CPU takes place in the
database,
which in our case is Oracle, and which happens to be 64bit anyway. So
it's not
a bad thing to build a 32 bit tuxedo application that runs on a 64 bit
operating
system, for most types of tuxedo applications.
"alex fuentes" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi again :
you link show that :
Sun Solaris 8 tuxedo v8.0 Native 64-bit version - SPARC
Sun Solaris 8 SPARC X *(using 2.7 32-bit binaries)
32-bit on 64-bit OS supported
Then Tuxedo 8.0 32.bit ruuning on Solaris 8 64-bit. OK
there is support from Bea . Is that is correct ???
I'll need used Tuxedo 64-bit ,you could benefit in performance.
Thanks Thanks ...
Alex ..
Scott Orshan <[email protected]> wrote:
If the platform list shows that a 32-bit build is certified on a 64bit
OS, then you can run it there.
If you want an actual 64 bit build, it is because you want the big
address space, longer longs in FML, and everything else you get from
64
bits.
If you want to have an application span Solaris and Digital UNIX, which
is always 64 bit, you might want both to be 64 bits so that you do
not
lose any data in the conversion.
On HP, you can't link 32-bit Tuxedo with another product that is 64-bit
(Oracle for example). You might need a 64 bit Tuxedo in order to work
with other products.
Scott Orshan
alex fuentes wrote:
HI :
I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit for solaris, my questions is :
Is there problems whith Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit running on Solaris 8 alsorunning 64-bit
( boot-mode )?
there is a Tuxedo 8.0 64-bit Why ??
Which different between Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit and 64-bit ??
Thanks ....
Alex ..

Solaris 10 64 bit for x86

When i typed isainfo -kv the output is
64-bit amd64 kernel modules. I think this means its a 32-bit OS anybody help when can i download 64bit?

It isn't clear to me why you think you have a 32-bit system but there is one potential source of confusion that I can think of. A 64-bit Solaris system has a 64-bit kernel and drivers and is fully capable of running both 32 and 64 bit binaries; however, most of the system binaries are still 32 bit. So if you run "file /usr/bin/ls" you'll see a 32-bit executable even on a 64 bit system.
If isainfo tells you it is a 64-bit system it is - even if most of the system binaries are compiled in 32 bit mode.

How to add new system call in solaris ?

Hi,
I want to add new system call in solaris. please inform me steps for adding new system call in solaris.
Thanks in advance,
Mahantesh.

Here's a Solaris 7 example I know there are others ...
http://access1.sun.com/cgi-bin/rinfo2html?267899.faq
I haven't seen a good example of how to support both the 32 and 63-bit environment.

Panic: on Solaris 7 64 bit

Ppl,
Mandar here. With the same problem of driver crashing on Solaris 7 64 bit. To just refresh you on whats happening.. i am developing a driver for a network device, under Solaris 7 for ultra sparc. This is a 32 bit PCI device. i am seeing a system crash while allocating dma resources. I have compiled the driver using -xarch=v9 for making it 64 bit. I could map device registers, add intr but the dma resource allocation crashes. My driver shares memory with the device. I tried to use, ddi_dma_alloc_handle followed by ddi_dma_mem_alloc and then ddi_dma_addr_bind_handle. The first two calls succeed without any problem.. the system crashes in the third call. I tried this, another way, using ddi_iopb_alloc followed by ddi_dma_addr_setup.. then i see the crash in ddi_dma_addr_setup
I had just kept this aside for a while, as I found that these same dma resource allocation sequences worked well on Solris 7 32 bit. So I proceeded with my 32 bit driver. This driver is now done, and running well. i got back to the problem on 64 bit. It is persisting. tried a lot of things.. but no success.. tried to plug the device in a 64 bit pci slot , link the driver using ld from /usr/ccs/bin/sparcv9/ld.. nothing rally works.
does anybody know, what the problem can be? Big diff, is the sequence works on 32 bit and crashes on 64 bit..
Looking forward to some help..
Thanks,
Mandar

Hi,
There are no 64 bit static "system" libraries supplied with Solaris 7.
So there is no question of linking them with the executable.
You may create your own 64 bit static library and link with the executable.
Thanks
Kalpesh

Solaris 9 32-bit application 256 descriptors

Hi,
There is a bug in Solaris, a 32-bit application running on 64-bit Solaris cannot open more than 256 descriptors. I read the article from Giri Mandalika http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/stdio_256.html. There is a solution for Solaris 10 described in that article. Is there any solution for Solaris 9? Was that solution backported to Solaris 9?
Any hint is appreciated.
Tomas

Hello.
This limitation is not a limitation of the Solaris operating system but of the libc library.
A simple workaround could be:
FILE *myfiles[1000];
int i;
// won't work if more than 256 files are open...
for(i=0;i<1000;i++) myfiles=fopen(names[i],"w");
for(i=0;i<1000;i++) fprintf(myfiles[i],"%u\n",i);
Workaround - NOT TESTED:FILE *f;
int myfiles[1000];
int i;
for(i=0;i<1000;i++) myfiles[i]=creat(names[i],0644);
for(i=0;i<1000;i++)
f=fdopen(dup(myfiles[i]),"w");
fprintf(f,"%u\n",i);
// fclose() will only close the handle duplicate returned by dup() !!
fclose(f);
-- EDIT --
Tested on Solaris 9/Sparc:
- You have to use "ulimit -n" to allow an application to use more than 256 file descriptors (maximum is 1024).
- If more than 256 files are open "dup" and "dup2" will cause an SIGSEGV - obviously a bug in Solaris.
Maybe you can use the following combination instead of using "fprintf":len=sprintf(buffer,...);
write(file[i],buffer,len);
I'm not sure if "write" etc. cause SIGSEGVs when more than 256 files are open.
Martin

I have a problem with installing PS13 as I get an error message "This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements." how do i do this?

i have a problem with installing PS13 as I get an error message "This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements." how do i do this

Try downloading the trial. It ought to detect that you have a 64-bit system.
You aren't using Vista, are you? PSE 13 requires at least win 7 and I think a few folks with vista have gotten a similar error message on trying to install it.

Install - Oracle 9i 64 bit on Solaris 9 32 bit

Hi Team,
Is it possible to install Oracle 9i 64 bit version on Solaris 9 32 bit OS?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
M.Saravanan

Hi.
This is the same question as "Is it possible copy 20GB of data to 10GB hard disk?".
Of course it is not possible.

I keep getting this error message "Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight" even though I have a 64 bit system?

Netflix requires Microsoft Silverlight plug in to view their videos. Every time I try to load it I get the following error message...Your operating system does not support the 64-bit version of Silverlight. I have a 64bit system with Windows Vista Home Premium. Firefox 33.0 is installed.
Any suggestions?

Your User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; '''WOW64'''; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0
As said Firefox for Windows from mozilla.org is a 32-bit application. The WOW64 in UA means it is a 32-bit application on 64-bit Windows.
Before you ask if there will be a Win64 version of Firefox. If all goes well the first phase of having Win64 for Release may be as early as Firefox 37.0
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64

Unable to install photoshop elements 13 on new computer. Error message is: This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of photoshop elements. How do I do this?

Unable to install photoshop elements 13 on new computer (Windows 8.1 OS). Error message is: This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of photoshop elements. How do I do this?

You can download the trial version of the software thru the page linked below and then use your current serial number to activate it.
Be sure to follow the steps outlined in the Note: Very Important Instructions section on the download pages at this site and have cookies enabled in your browser or else the download will not work properly.
Photoshop/Premiere Elements 13: http://prodesigntools.com/photoshop-elements-13-direct-download-links-premiere.html

I am unable to install photoshop elements13 due to an error. it shows no error code but does say - This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements.

i am unable to install photoshop elements13 due to an error. it shows no error code but does say - This installer does not support installation on a 64-Bit Windows operating system. Please download the 64-Bit version of Photoshop Elements.

download the 64bit installer,
Downloads available:
Suites and Programs: CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
Acrobat: XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
Premiere Elements: 13 | 12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
Photoshop Elements: 13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
Lightroom: 5.7| 5 | 4 | 3
Captivate: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5
Contribute: CS5 | CS4, CS3
Download and installation help for Adobe links
Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages. They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3. If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64 and other microssoft x64 OS-s.

BUG! Not system locale Filenames support for 32-bit applications error in Windows 8.1 x64.
All Windows x64 (XP,2003,2007,Vista,7,8) have no support for not system locale filenames|foldernames for all 32-bit applications. I think it is BUG!
For example, it is possible to read files|folders with French or Chinese in English locale windows installed, rename it, but it is not possible open it, edit or delete. (ERRORS: File not found OR Unknown format)
With using 64-bit programs no such problems. How does it works and how can I fix this? Is it problem with encoding in translating kernel instructions for 32-bit apps in x64 Windows OS's? Whether there are
solutions to this problem OR some hacks|fixes?

Hi,
Have you installed the language package for French or Chinese?
If no, please download the language package and install them.
To download language package, please click the link below,
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/language-packs#lptabs=win7
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run

Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
 at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
 at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
 at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
 at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
 at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000 /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000 /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000 /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000 /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000 /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000 /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000 /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000 /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000 /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000 /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000 /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000 /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000 /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000 /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000 /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000 /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000 /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000 /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000 /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000 /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000 /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000 /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#

I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
#192.168.100.1 bt.lan.home bt
#192.168.100.5 jacek.lan.home jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

How to upgrade oracle 32 to 64 bit on sun solaris x86 64 bit OS?

Hi,
I want to upgrade/convert 32 bit Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 to 64 bit database. Existing 32 bit database is RAC and it is running on Sun Solaris X86 64 bit OS.
First, I want to know is it possible?
If yes, then what are the exact steps?

Hi,
Such a migration can be done, just follow the steps in Metalink note 62290.1
It is important to remember that 64-bit database requires more shared pool memory so you should increase your shared pool size.
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]
Edited by: Liron Amitzi on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM

Oracle 9i 32 bit in Solaris 9 64 bits

can anyone tell me what is the Maximum SGA size i can set for Oracle database 9i 32 bit running in Solaris 9 64 bits?
Oracle version : Oracle Enterprise Edition 9.2.0.1 32-bits
OS: Solaris 9 64 bits.
16GB RAM

user4738409 wrote:
can anyone tell me what is the Maximum SGA size i can set for Oracle database 9i 32 bit running in Solaris 9 64 bits?
Oracle version : Oracle Enterprise Edition 9.2.0.1 32-bits
OS: Solaris 9 64 bits.
16GB RAMrefer:http://www.dbmonster.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/oracle-server/8028/Max-SGA-size-for-32-bit-9-2-0-6-on-Solaris
this may help you,
regards,

System 9.3 Solaris 10-64 bit Vs 32Bit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for