System allow to cancel the delivery before cancel the Billilng Doc

Dear Guru's,
System allow to cancel delivery Doc & Reverse PGI Before Cancel The Billing Document ,How to Control It P;ease Quide me.
Regards.
Rishaban.U

i think it may happened if your item category is order related billing not delivery related billing
check your item category in VOV7 ... check that the Billing Relevance is "A"
hope it may help

Similar Messages

System allow to cancel the delivery with cancel the Billilng Doc

Dear Guru's,
System allow to cancel delivery Doc & Reverse PGI Before Cancel The Billing Document ,How to Control It P;ease Quide me.
Regards.
Sundhar.U

i think it may happened if your item category is order related billing not delivery related billing
in VOV7 check that the Billing Relevance in your item category is "A"

System allows to posts the MIRO wrong

Hello friends,
System allowed to post the tran MIRO, though there is no Value in Amount Field and
I saw the entry in MIR4, the value posted to Differenc ac rather than Venfor ac.
For other entries systems not allowing for posting without enter the value in Amount field.
So i don't understnad how the sytem allowed for that entry only
and i tried to reverse in MR8M but systems is showing error that "Tax code country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN".
So please advise me how to reverse the entry or clear.
Raju

Hi Amish,
you are correct.
It was posted to Price Diff ac
but how can i reverse it in MR8M. as my second message, it encounters the issue "Tax code country IN does not exist in tax procedure TAXINN
So can i make the Debit note for this issue
is it suggestble. please let me know
Raju

Once payment received for bill system should not allow to cancel

Hi Experts ,
we have created commercial invoice and posted to fi document and payment received from party.but when we try to cancel the same billing document system allowing to cancel the document.So Client requirement is once payment received from party system it should not allow to cancel the billing document.
Please give your valuable suggestions on the same ...
regards...
MM

Hello,
In the Tx VOFA for the billing type to be cancelled(Ex F2), please
fill the field Copying Requirements(V_TVFK-GRBED_S) with '29'.
This routine prevents the cancellation of the billing documents which
have been cleared.
Regards,
Raghavendra YN

System is allowing to do invoice verification before goods receipt.

Dear Friends,
I need your help in following scenario, as my system is allowing to do invoice verification before goods receipt.
To test these scenario.I have created one PO. For this PO I done goods receipt. I done invoice verification by putting invoice date as past date, posting date system date means current date. I want to stop this as system is allowing invoicing verification to be done before goods receipt.
Also, I tried after un-ticking GR based IV.
Please suggest me the solution how to stop this. Please help this is urgent.
With Best Regards,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
A)
In goods-receipt-based (GR-based) invoice verification, the invoice relates not to the purchase order, but to individual deliveries. That is to say, the reference document for the invoice is not the PO but the delivery note or the goods receipt document.
Whether you use this approach depends on your billing arrangement with the vendor. This method can be advantageous, for example, when you know the order will be fulfilled by means of many partial deliveries.
Prerequisites
Before you can use GR-based invoice verification, the following prerequisites must be satisfied:
The indicator for GR-based invoice verification (GR-based IV) must be selected for the relevant item in the purchase order (item detail screen).
<b>
A goods receipt must occur before the invoice is entered in the system.</b>
B) If you are carrying out invoice verification with reference to PO, system will not check for the GR. The entire PO amount can be posted.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
Viswanath

System does not propose the delivery date based on factory calendar

Hi,
I am creating a sales order for a delivery date for this sat which is (2/22/09)
I have maintained 2 separate calendars for
1) shipping point
2) for the route
The route has a transit time of 1 day and the calendar has sat and sunday as non working.
the Shipping point has a pick/pack time of 1 day and the calendar has sat and sunday as non working
The material is available in the warehouse
Now when i create this sales order i enter the delivery date as 2/22/09, the system does not propose me the delivery date of monday (i.e 2/23/09) It accepts the 2/22/09 delivery date.
In the schedule line i do see the date as 2/22/09 only.
The delivery was created with the following dates
Picking = 2/17/09
Transportation Planning = 02/18/2009
Loading =02/18/2009
Planned GI= 02/18/2009
Delivery Date = 02/22/2009
How can the system give me the delivery date of a sunday when the calendar doesnt allow sunday as working day.
Also the route time is 1 day in transit so i am not sure why the system is proposing a 3 day transit time?
Can any one explain the behaviour of SAP for the delivery date logic

Dspsac,
Delivery date can be any date. For instance, if your customer insisted on a Sunday delivery, you would accommodate him, regardless of any calendar.
From the delivery date, the system counts backwards USING THE FACTORY CALENDAR ASSIGNED TO THE ROUTE by the number of days in the route. You have to consult the FC assigned to your Route to determine if the GI date has been properly calculated.
From the GI date, the system counts backward Pick/pack time, using the shipping point calendar, to arrive at Material availability date.
Calculations are explained in SAP online help
[Transportation and Delivery Scheduling|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/dd/5607e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm]
Regards,
DB49

When i cancelled the billing doc through VF11 Fi document not yet creted.

Pls help on this issue.
When i cancelled the billing doc through VF11 Fi document not yet creted. system thrown the given below error:
                                                                                Diagnosis   :                                                                          The document does not exist. It was possibly not posted and therefore cannot be read from the database.
Procedure :
     Repeat the transaction at a later time.
Pls help on this issue.I assign full marks .
Rgds
Mahesh

Dear Mahesh
This is bcoz you have not assigned the Accounting Document type for your cancellation billing document.
Go to VOFA, select the cancel billing document type S1 and [see whether S1 is maintained] against the field [Document Type]   Most probably, in your case, it is not maintained and hence the problem.
Maintain S1 in the above field and retry to cancel the billing document.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

I cancelled the billing doc through VF11 Fi document not yet creted

Pls help on this issue.
When i cancelled the billing doc through VF11 Fi document not yet creted. system thrown the given below error:
                                                                                Diagnosis   :                                                                          The document does not exist. It was possibly not posted and therefore cannot be read from the database.
Procedure :
     Repeat the transaction at a later time.
Pls help on this issue.I assign full marks .
Rgds
Mahesh

First check whether accounting posting has been made for your Invoice or not.If accounting document has been created then go to VOFA and check the "Invoice cancellation" field and not the Document type field.
For your billing type F2, Invoice cancellation billing type should be S1 in the standard system.
Document type field is for creation of accounting document type in FI. When you create F2 type of billing document, then DR type of accounting document should be created in FI.
If this "Document type" field is blank than whatever may be the Billing type ,when it is released to accounting , RV type of document will be created.
Regards
Pradyumna

Java daemon on boot: "This user is not allowed access to the window system right now."

The daemon is located in /Library/LaunchDaemons/ and launches successfully on most occasions. However, it sometimes fails to start with this error:
Nov 17 20:36:24 server.local java[28972]: This user is not allowed access to the window system right now.
Nov 17 20:36:24 server com.apple.launchd[1] (net.java.server): Throttling respawn: Will start in 10 seconds
I have the server command running as a background daemon using its "nogui" option (the developers claim to have written it to not display a gui). However, it seems that somewhere along the line, Java is trying to display something. As the daemon is running before users log in, it gives this error. Once a user is logged in to the system, it runs fine; however, logging in a user to run the server is not an option. It needs to run on boot.
Any ideas for how to solve this? I'm going to contact the developers to see if it may be something they can fix, but I want to be able to force the issue in case the problem ever occurs in the future.

Irrespective of any claims by the developer, this certainly appears to be a test case that shows that the tool is not working as expected, and that the application has a bug. This test case would be better if there was some evidence around why only some of the startups fail, but in general this will involve what's been suggested earlier: "Contact the application developer."
As some general background on what's involved, see daemons and agents and related; processes that are not allowed to connect to the GUI for reasons of security.
I'd also suggest testing your DNS, as seeing "server.local" can imply local DNS configuration errors. Launch Terminal.app from Applications > Utilities and issue the following harmless diagnostic command and see if it reports no changes, or if it detects network or DNS errors:
sudo changeip -checkhostname
If this is OS X Server and a NAT'd network, you do not want to reference any DNS servers located off of your NAT'd network.
Why DNS? Because DNS errors can cause only some operations to fail, particularly if there's more than one DNS server selected (and where some subset of the DNS servers are malfunctioning or misconfigured).

Cancel billing doc, will it automatically cancel the accounting doc?

Hi experts,
I have the following case:
- Sales order created
- Outbound delivery created
- billing document created
- accounting document posted but not yet clear
- all of the transactions are in the previous period that already closed
With some reason, I need to reverse all the document related, so the customer line item will not contains the open item from above transaction.
If I cancel the billing doc, will it automatically reverse the accounting doc as well?
Kindly advise the step.
Thanks and regards,
rob

Hi
Further I would like to clarify that the cancellation of Billing Document will create a cancellation document in Accounting too. At the same time, It will not clear the original Accouting Document of the Orignal Billing Document. Clearing to be done manually.
Cancellation of Billing Document will create a Cancellation document in Accounting even when the original accounting doucment has been already cleared.
In SD, there is a link between Orignal Billing Dcoument and Cancellation Docuemnt but in FI, there is not.
Thanks
Prasad

System should not allow to do the changes in PO once the ID created.

Hi All,
Once the Inbound Delivery is Created based on the Purchse Order, System should not allow to do the changes in the Purchase Order like Deletion of Item, etc..
Any Configuration Changes is avaliable. ?
Regards,
Sudhakar

Dear,
Please check the staus in order
Current order status xxxx does not allow goods receipt (Message no. C6009)? is this the message?
This will not allow you to do GR for production order when you activate status profile "SAT1" in the production order. After that when you confirm order it will automatically assign next user status i.e. "SAT2" (if not assign it manually in CO02) it will allow you to do GR for that production order.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Price Increase - not allowed to cancel COMPLAINT

I am currently speaking to Nidhi who told me that I wasn't allowed to cancel my services due to the price increase (my notice was part of my online bill - and I couldn't read it as it was the Welsh version!!)
After telling her that it quite clearly states on the website that I CAN she tells me I've misunderstood the wording and I'm in a contract which I can't cancel!!
After stating that I will stay on the phone to 9pm to speak to her supervisor to clarify the situation if that's what it takes, as either the website or herself is lying.
After a quick 'confer' with a colleague I've been put through to the team to cancel my services.
Is this customer service acceptable? Bullying your customers into staying with you?
I already have a hefty complaint going to BT regarding my excessive and unexplained broadband usage for September. This will be getting added to it.

jipjon wrote:
Hello,
This is just happeneing to me too. 20GB average for 18months then I renew my contract for another 12months on 8th September and surpirse suprise 50GB used in September and already 7GB in first two days of October means I'm heading for over 100GB this month! Wow. If it is not a scam of sorts they are not taking responsibility for any problem.
I'll keep asking the questions of them and showing them the evidence my end but unless they look at their end what can we do? Like others I've just renewed so feel trapped with this for year. Vert stressful and a shame as had great experience for my intial 18 month contract.
But has nothing to do with a price increase;
Re: Price Increase - not allowed to cancel COMPLAINT
toekneem
http://www.no2nuisancecalls.net
(EASBF)

How do I set upmy Imac to allow using both my computer speakers and a Bose SoundLink system as outputs at the same time. I can use one or the other, but not both.

how do I set up my Imac to allow using both my computer speakers and a Bose SoundLink system as outputs at the same time. I can use one or the other, but not both. From systems Preferences I must select one or the other. I want both to work all the time.

Hi,
I would recommend you to use 0FI_AP_4 rather using both, particularly for many reasons -
1. DS: 0FI_AP_4 replaces DataSource 0FI_AP_3 and still uses the same extraction structure. For more details refer to the OSS note 410797.
2. You can run the 0FI_AP_4 independent of any other FI datasources like 0FI_AR_4 and 0FI_GL_4 or even 0FI_GL_14. For more details refer to the OSS note: 551044.
3. Map the 0FI_AP_4 to DSO: 0FIAP_O03 (or create a Z one as per your requirement).
4. Load the same to a InfoCube (0FIAP_C03).
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Nazeer

After creation of PO system should not allow to change the price in PO

Hi There,
In my scenario once PO is created then after send to vendor PO print document,Users are changing the price in PO.so system should not allow to change the price in PO once PO got saved.
So please advice.

Hi,
you could set in customizing for field selection keys the net price
to display for ME22N so that changes can not be made
(transaction OLME -> purchase order -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level).
Please check that you have set all the relevant field selection
groups to display: AKTV, ME22, ME22N... (read and apply note 30316)
Other workaround is try to do by yourself with the badi
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and send your own error message.
Regards,
Edit

System is allowing to post the Adv Pmt amount more than the PO Value

Hi Experts,
I am FICO Consultant. I facing one problem regarding Advance Payment. We have a process to for making advance payment with reference to Purchase Order and Purchase Order Line Item. But system is allowing to post the advance payment amount more than the Purchase Order Value. I want to prevent this to happen. The system should not allow to make advance payment more than the Purchase Order value.
Please help me on this issue.
Thanks in Advance and Regards,
Alkesh Mistry

HI
Please create the Advance payment request with PO number using sp gl indicator as F and then make the advance payment using the request.
Regds
Rajiv

System allow to cancel the delivery before cancel the Billilng Doc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for