System allows to mark absence on holidays

Dear all,
As per the current configuration, system allows to mark absens on holidays and restric on weekly off.
I want system to restict to apply absence on holiday too.
Can anyone help me?
Regards
ET

1) Go to define absence type node _>  under the absence input checks give the code E(error)  for First day is off , Las day is off and non-working period , So when we apply absence on weekoffs or holidays it will give error meesage to not to apply absence ......
2) In the absence coutning rule select only not a public holiday  do not select others under holidayclass, this will ensure your holiday will not be counted if you apply on holiday
do the above steps it will help you .... let me know .......

Similar Messages

  • Only records of less than one day allowed for attendance/absence type COMP

    Hi Friends
    I configured all the process in IMG for compensatory off
    ie ,Absence types,Attendance Types ,counting rules and assignment
    but when I tried to create attendances on a particular public holiday in PA 30 then the system shows 'Only records of less than one day allowed for attendance/absence type COMP' (Compensatory Off)
    Anyone pls help me to solve this problem
    regards
    Lakshmi

    Hi
    In PA30 which infotype I should maintain  and where I can see the result.
    Eg If the person works on 25/12/2007(public holiday) ,he wants to take compensatory off on the next working day.
    In this case How I can configure
    Pls help
    Regards
    Lakshmi

  • System allows to  post migo even after material flaged for deletion.

    Dear Experts,
                          system allowing to post MIGO , even after  material has been flaged for  deletion.
                          while posting migo, system giving warning, i want this to be error, how to achive this.  
    regards
    rajakarthik.

    yes it'll allow u to create PO , GR ..etc.
    Because its flagged for deletion means , its nothing but u have marked for deletion. only marking jus lik u have noted that has to be deleted from system.
    But by doing MM06 it 'll not get change. So u have to archivation .
    Revert if any clarification....
    Thanks
    SAP_MM

  • PO DELETED AFTER MADE GRN AND PAYMENT----SYSTEM ALLOWED

    Dear friends
              In our company the user deleted the purchase order after done GRN and made payment.
    The question is how the system allowed to do it?
    i checked the system message to stopit but i couldn't found it.so could anyone let me know is there configure need to do or any user exit need to activate?
    Thanks &Regards
    S.Anbalagan

    06 115 is only pulled when received quantity is unequal to invoiced quantity. if both are equal, then the PO can be deleted.
    ...... and this is designed this way.
    A deletion is just part of the life cycle of a purchase order, and it is just a required step in the preparation for archiving.
    So you cannot prevent it except by a user exit, but this one will as well stop you from archiving later on, (except you code it in a way that you allow deletion if it is carried out by traxaction e.g. SARA )

  • System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear

    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or  is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    Is there another way of preventing the Goods Receipts to be reversed after invoices have been posted and cleared?
    Thanks,

    System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear
    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    I also checked the "GR based IV" in the PO item details, inoive tab and that is not checked.
    Invoice have been posted and cleared and now the GRs are reversing them, how to prevent this from happening. Is there a config. solution???
    Thanks,

  • System allow to cancel the delivery  before  cancel the Billilng Doc

    Dear Guru's,
    System allow to cancel delivery Doc & Reverse PGI Before Cancel The Billing Document ,How to Control It P;ease Quide me.
    Regards.
    Rishaban.U

    i think it may happened if your item category is order related billing not delivery related billing
    check your item category in VOV7 ... check that the Billing Relevance is "A"
    hope it may help

  • System allow to cancel the delivery with cancel the Billilng Doc

    Dear Guru's,
                           System allow to cancel delivery Doc & Reverse PGI  Before Cancel The Billing Document ,How to Control It P;ease Quide me.
    Regards.
    Sundhar.U

    i think it may happened if your item category is order related billing not delivery related billing
    in VOV7 check that the Billing Relevance in your item category is "A"

  • System allows to posts the MIRO wrong

    Hello friends,
    System allowed to post the tran MIRO, though there is no Value in Amount Field and
    I saw the entry in MIR4, the value posted to Differenc ac rather than Venfor ac.
    For other entries systems not allowing for posting without enter the value in Amount field.
    So i don't understnad how the sytem allowed for that entry only
    and i tried to reverse in MR8M but systems is showing error that "Tax code country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN".
    So please advise me how to reverse the entry or clear.
    Raju

    Hi Amish,
    you are correct.
    It was posted to Price Diff ac
    but how can i reverse it in MR8M. as my second message, it encounters the issue "Tax code country IN does not exist in tax procedure TAXINN
    So can i make the Debit note for this issue
    is it suggestble. please let me know
    Raju

  • Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking

    Hi,
    I have executed the costing in CK11N and saved the result. The costing run was successful without any error.
    When I want to Mark the cost in CK24, I am getting the below error. Kindly help to resolve this issue.
    Change selection criteria or check allowance for marking
    Message no. CKCC140
    Diagnosis
    No data was selected for marking.
    Possible causes:
    There is insufficient data in the selection screen to select the required cost estimates.
    The organizational measure was not carried out, or it was issued with a different costing variant to that of the cost estimates ( Marking Allowance).
    All the cost estimates contain errors.
    The cost estimates have already been marked or released.
    For detailed information, call up the log.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Dear Murugesan,
    First ensure in CK11N,you have saved the cost estimate without any error,the signal showing with green colour.
    Then in CK24,first take a test run for marking and then without the check box for test run.
    Before Executing this T Code for marking,click on marking allowance and ensure for the period,company code and the same
    costing variant and costing version,it shows green colour which indicates alloed for marking and release,otherwise,just click on
    your company code,enter the costing variant and costing version and save the datas.
    This should be done only once during the period begining.
    Once after doing this,ensure you have complete authorization for marking and release.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • System allow GR for a material without profit center maintained it it while Doc. splitting is active

    Dears,
    My client in the Go-live phase and there is an issue related to GR a material without having a profit center in it's master data, the system allow receipt 100 PC and when reversing the GR from MIGO the system display the error "Balancing in profit center is not filled" !!
    so when we try to maintain a profit center in the material master data the system display error that the material already has a balance Q!
    i mean why is the system allow the GR  to happened if the material does not have a profit center
    Note: i checked the configuration for Doc splitting and it's already maintained in the right way !.
    Thanks and best regards,
    Ahmed Samir

    Hi,
    When GR is happens document splitting has not activated????
    Regd,
    Khan.

  • Only records of less than one day allowed for attendance/absence type 1002

    Hi All,
    I am getting an error while maintaining my sick leave absence type
    "Only records of less than one day allowed for attendance/absence type 1002"
    how to resolve this
    SD

    Bcz recently i made a change like this
    For our sick leave
    "First 14 days(1- 2 weeks) Full Salary
    Next 14 days (3- 4 weeks) 75% Salary
    Next 14 days (5- 6 weeks) 50% salary
    Next 28 days (7- 10 Weeks) 25 % Salary
    More than 10 Weeks no Salary"
    so what i did is
    I mantain one Sick leave type and counting rule as -
    seq no 1 for "First 14 days(1- 2 weeks) Full Salary
    seq no 2  for Next 14 days (3- 4 weeks) 75% Salary
    like this for all the conditions
    and in deduction rule I maintained deifferent Absence quotas
    Plz suggest me this solution will work out
    SD

  • Source system R33CLNT100 is marked as inactive in BI.

    Dear Experts
    When I do a source system check via RSA1 > Source systems > SAP folder > right-click the R/3 system ID and select Check function,
    the system throws as error as shown :
    "Source system R33CLNT100 is marked as inactive in BI."
    "Procedure
        If you have upgraded to BW 2.0, activate the source system.
        With other errors connected to this source system, choose Restore   the
        source system from the source system tree in the Data Warehousing
        Workbench. This regenerates the source system, merges the relevant
        communication parameters, and replicates the DataSources in BI.
    and
    "BI IDoc type ZZZZ011 is not the same as source system IDoc type ZSSS021     RSAR     371     
    There was a system Refresh from Production R/3 46C to QA system R/3 46C.
    We did the BDLS but the IDOC seems to have got overwritten by R/3 Production's, obviously , due to refresh.
    Any idea how to resolve this?
    It seems like I need to re-create manually the idoc but I am not expert in this area.
    I do know there are standard IDOC aspects for BI 7.
    But how to re-create the relevant IDOC settings or configurations ? Need to do this in both  BI and R/3 ?
    Best regards
    Pascal

    Hi pascal ,
    Seems to be connectivity between the source system and the Bi system it will be restore by basis team only. Couple of tings that you can do at your end will make their work at ease
    i) check the RFC connection between the Source system and the Bi system in Sm59.
    ii)Make sure the user ALERMOTE and SAPCPIC are unlock in ecc side
    Now for configuring the source system by urself follow the below points :
    1. In BW, call TA RSA1.
    2. In the left hand column, choose "Source systems".
    3. In the column Source systems, right click on the respective source system and choose "Restore".
    4. A popup "Create R/3 source system" appears. Enter the passwords for user SAPCPIC. Hit enter.
    5. A popup "Please log on as an administrator in the following screen." appears. Hit enter.
    6. A logon screen of the child system appears. Enter your user and password and hit enter.
    7. A popup "New source system connection" appears. Hit "Continue".
    8. A popup "Check RFC destination" appears. Hit "Check".
    9. The child system jumps into TA59, displaying the RFC destination pointing to the BW system. Check it by pressing "Remote logon" (nothing happens, i.e. no error message appears!) and "Test connection" (the connection test table will be displayed). Hit F3 twice. The system jumps back.
    10. The popup "Check RFC destination" appears again. Now hit "Use".
    11. A popup "Connection can not be used" appears. Hit "Delete".
    12. A popup "Please log on as an administrator in the following screen." appears. Hit enter.
    13. A logon screen of the child system appears. Enter your user and password and hit enter.
    14. A popup "New source system connection" appears. Hit "Continue".
    15. A popup "Check RFC destination" appears. Hit "Check".
    16. The child system jumps into TA59, displaying the RFC destination pointing to the BW system. Check it by pressing "Remote logon" (nothing happens, i.e. no error message appears!) and "Test connection" (the connection test table will be displayed). Hit F3 twice. The system jumps back.
    17. The popup "Check RFC destination" appears again. Now hit "Use".
    18. A popup "Replicate Metadata?" appears. Hit "Only Activate".
    19. If popup "Do you want to reactivate all transfer structures and DataSources?" appears. Hit "No". If "Display activation log" popup appears - press "No" (that message may appear several times).
    20. Press "Back" if "Analyze application logs" screen appears
    Source -->http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1892011
    Thanks,
    Deepak

  • WBS status locked - system allows consumption

    Dear Experts ,
    I need expert opinion on the following two points.
    1. My WBS status is locked. But the system allows consumption of materail (ie 261 movement) against production order assigned  to the WBS
    2. My WBS status is locked. But the system allows to create schedule lines against the scheduled agrrement assigned to the WBS.
    Due to the above two phenomeneon , the system is allowing comitment & incurrence to happen even for closed WBS.
    Are the functionality described above are part of standrad PS process.
    If yes, then how to tackle these points. If no, then is there any PS configuration for providing checks.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vishal Murmoo

    Hi Khader Sir/ PSR
    Thanks for the reply .
    As suggested by PSR , the user status should be used to prohibit business transcation . In my case for Order Confirmation , Goods Receipts & Schedule delivery .
    I made the configuration chnages for user status ( locked), which prohibits all the above mentioned transcation. This user status is mainatined for the concerned WBS .
    But still i found that it is actaully not working .The system allows  Order Confirmation , Goods Receipts & Schedule delivery .
    against WBS having user staus locked.
    Is it that i have missed some configuration.
    Need experts suggestions on this matter
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Why am I getting this error message: Unable to write the email to the mailbox. Make sure the file system allows you write privileges, and you have enough disk s

    I am getting this error message, just starting today: Unable to write the email to the mailbox. Make sure the file system allows you write privileges, and you have enough disk space to copy the mailbox. I have tried several solutions (cleaning out my inbox, compacting folders, rebooting, checking through the webmail side), all to no avail, Can anyone help?

    which os do you have?

  • Err "Only absence less than 1 day are allowed for this absence type

    Hi Experts,
    When I am creating IT2001 record for EL an error is coming, "Only absence less than 1 day are allowed for this absence type". Although Counting rule is defined properly and in check for Condition of absence <1 day & full day both are checked.
    Regards,
    Tomesh

    Hi Nalla,
    The remaining amount for Casual leave is not updated even after we apply the casual leave .
    Suppose there are 20 CL quotas available. If we apply for 2 CLs then remaining should be 18.
    Regards,
    Tomesh

Maybe you are looking for