System call docu

Hello!
Do you know where can I get Documantation about all the SAP System Calls.
ABAP_CALLSTACK
ABAP_CRC64
ABAP_PRECOMPILED_HEADER_USAGE
ABSTOR_TEST AB_CALL_LITL_CHECK AB_CALL_STACK_TRACE
AB_CREATE_SAPHFILE
AB_DELETE_ALL_MEM
AB_DELETE_ALL_SHARED
AB_DELETE_MEM AB_DELETE_SHARED
AB_FIELD_CHECKWRITEADDRESS
AB_FIELD_INFO
AB_FRAG_VIEW_TO_ITAB
AB_GET_CALLER AB_GET_COUNTRY
AB_GET_CX_DATA
Regards
sas

The documentation for these system calls is internal to SAP. We can't get at it, unfortunately.
See this: SAP R/3 : System Functions
matt
Edited by: Matt on Nov 17, 2008 10:44 AM

Similar Messages

After I downloaded firefox 4.1 when I go to open documents I get a "system call falied" I cant open anything help!! It is also missing off my desktop

After downloading the newest firefox every time I go to open any documents, pics etc I get a "system call failed" I cant open anything and all my icons disappeared from my desktop and were unclickable when there after this initially happened.

For older Macs that aren't supported in Firefox 4.0, try TenFourFox for PowerPC's running Mac 10.4.11 & 10.5.8 . 
http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
You can get 3.6.16 from here: 
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

Windows 2008 x64 TS Printing - The data area passed to a system call is too small

Hi,
I have a Windows 2008 TS using Easy Print. The server has two quad core cpu's with 16Gb of ram and is running a light processing accounting program for 80 users. The machine and easy print both work fine until the server reaches about 5Gb of memory in use. Once this happens user's documents stop printing with event id's 6161 The data area passed to a system call is too small being logged. None of the hotfixes seem to be applicable to my scenario as I am not getting the common "Access Denied" error. I have increased received and transmit buffer sizes on both NIC's to the 2048 maximum, and set the Sizreqbuf setting in the registry - to no avail.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
Thanks for the post.
The Event error 6161 is caused by one of the following conditions:
The printer is not reachable on the network
Windows cannot allocate sufficient memory
There was invalid or incomplete data received by the print spooler
A driver upgrade failed
There is a bad printer device driver
For more information, please refer to the following article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773865(WS.10).aspx
In this case, I assume that this issue may be caused by the insufficient memory.
In Event Viewer, examine the event and look for the following text: "Win32 error code returned by the print processor: 8. Not enough storage is available to process this command".
If so, please collect system information for 60 seconds and generate a System Diagnostics Report:
Open an elevated Command Prompt window. (Click Start, point to All Programs, click Accessories, right-click Command Prompt, and then click Run as administrator.)
At the command prompt, type perfmon /report and then press ENTER. Reliability and Performance Monitor will start collecting data to create the System Diagnostics Report.
When the report is ready for viewing, locate the Diagnostic Results section of the report, and then check for any warnings (indicated by Warnings in the report). You can follow links to additional help on resolving warnings from this section. In addition, you can expand each category in the Basic System Checks section to see more details about why warnings appear. Also, the Performance section provides process-level details about top consumers of resources. You might need to increase the size of the paging file or add physical memory.
Thanks,
Miles

Solaris 10: intercepting system calls

Hello,
I have a problem: I don't manage to intercept system calls (as described in this document http://packetstormsecurity.org/groups/thc/slkm-1.0.html). Is it because solaris 10 doesn't use the syscall table ?
Another problem that I have is that I don't manage to perform a simple printf() on the screen when I use a load my kernel module. Has someone got an explanation ?
In fact I need to intercept some syscall like SYS_open, SYS_read, ... to perform custom actions. Do you have another way to do this ?
Thanks in advance for you help.

BTW, I'm running 64-bit Solaris as a VirtualBox (3.0.10) guest VM on a 32-bit WinXP host.

"The data area passed to a system call is too small" NFS client Windows 2008 R2 SP1

Hi
I need to map a Hyper-V virtual windows server to a UNIX folder, but when i made de mapping and tried to navigate in to the mapped unit and shows me:
"The data area passed to a system call is too small"
I tried too many things like adding a registry key (and windows 2008 r2 already has)
Use a similar account between Unix and Windows domain
I done the steps in the document:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753302(WS.10).aspx
And nothing, this is just frustrating, also I disabled the firewall in the virtual machine and the host server.
I have a Windows 2008 Domain R2 functionality and the virtual machine is Windows 2008 R2 too.
The version of unix are:
AIX6.1 x64
AIX 6.3 x64
AIX 5.1 x86
Any Idea?
Thanks!
Doc MX

Hi,
You may perform the following troubleshooting suggestions:
l
Change how your NFS servers export the NFS shares and make them allow connections from high ports.
l
Add UseReservedPorts DWORD value under HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Client for NFS\CurrentVersion\Default and set it to 1. Restart the Client for NFS service to allow
the change to take effect.
For more information, please refer to the following Microsoft MSDN blog:
"Network Error 53", "The data area passed to a system call is too small" or "Unknown Error"
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sfu/archive/2011/07/14/3087987.aspx
Regards,
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

A problem about system-call

hi guys,
 i found in the interface IF_HTTP_ENTITY
 the method SET_HEADER_FIELD has the codes like below
 system-call ict
 did
 ihttp_scid_add_header_field " add instead of set!!!
 parameters
 m_c_msg " > c handle
 name " > header field name
 value " > header field value
 m_last_error. " < return code
i have look at the help of the system-call ,but i cant find the same help about the ICT and did
my question is can somebody give some explanation about
system-call ict
did
parameter
thank you

hi
i just only new in BSP application,my question is why after the "system-call" we can use the parameter "did" and "ict".
i have just refer to the help document of the "system-call" but i can't find the information about the code
system-call ict
did
ihttp_scid_add_header_field " add instead of set!!!
parameters
m_c_msg " > c handle
name " > header field name
value " > header field value
m_last_error. " < return code

so can you give me some explanation about this ?
i wont do something to change them.
thank you

How to get swap size by using system call?

How can I get the size of swap.What system call or library Routines can be used? please help me.

Hi,
Threre's an interface called swap_ctl by wich you can get more information related to virtual memory. Here's an example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/swap.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
int
main(int argc, char*argv[])
swaptbl_t *st;
int swap_count, i;
long long swap_total=0, swap_avail=0;
long pgsize_in_kbytes = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) / 1024L;
if ((swap_count=swapctl(SC_GETNSWP, NULL)) == -1)
perror("swapctl(SC_GETNSWP)"), exit(-1);
if (swap_count == 0)
(void)printf("No swap files/partitions allocated\n"), exit(0);
* Although it's not particularly clear in the documentation, you're
* responsible for creating a variable length structure (ie. the
* array is within the struct rather than being pointed to
* by the struct). Also, it is necessary for you to allocate space
* for the path strings (see /usr/include/sys/swap.h).
st = (swaptbl_t*)malloc(sizeof(int) + swap_count * sizeof(struct swapent));
if (st == NULL)
perror(argv[0]), exit(-1);
st->swt_n = swap_count;
for (i=0; i < swap_count; i++) {
if ((st->swt_ent.ste_path = (char*)malloc(MAXPATHLEN)) == NULL)
perror(argv[0]), exit(-1);
if ((swap_count=swapctl(SC_LIST, (void*)st)) == -1)
perror("swapctl(SC_LIST)"), exit(-1);
for (i=0; i < swap_count; i++) {
swap_total += st->swt_ent.ste_pages * pgsize_in_kbytes;
swap_avail += st->swt_ent.ste_free * pgsize_in_kbytes;
(void)printf("Total swap = %lld available swap = %lld\n",
swap_total, swap_avail);
return 0;
There's a very interesting document about Solaris Kernel/Performance Stats available at http://www.idiom.com/~gford/admin/howto/perf.html. Very interesting.
Hope this helps

Error during installation of ECC6- system call failed

Dear all,
i encounter the error as below during sap installation. its looks like the ID issue, but this id (fbqadm) is using by me to log into the windows. please help me.
thank
ERROR 2009-03-17 10:07:25.583 [syxxsyshlp.cpp:78]
 syslib::printOSError(const iastring &, int, DWORD, const iastring &, CMessage::eLogMessage)
FSL-00001 System call failed. Error 1326 (Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
) in execution of system call 'LogonUser' with parameter (fbqadm, SAPFBWDEV01, *******, LOGON32_LOGON_INTERACTIVE,LOGON32_PROVIDER_DEFAULT,&hUserToken), line (1014) in file (synxccuren.cpp).
TRACE 2009-03-17 10:07:25.813 [iaxxejsbas.hpp:408]
 handleException<ESyException>()
Converting exception into JS Exception ESyException.
TRACE 2009-03-17 10:07:25.813
Function setMessageIdOfExceptionMessage: modlib.jslib.caughtException

problem fix after reboot the server

Error on WAS no. 10054 SAP Basis System: Operating system call

Hi All,
Error on WAS no. 10054 SAP Basis System: Operating system call
we got the following error message in the syslog of the WAS:
SAP Basis System: Operating system call recv failed (error no. 10054)
The system still works. What can we do?
Thanks.
Best Regards,

Hi,
Please check the folloiwng notes
Error no. 10054
34116 - Syslog: "Operating System call xxxx failed"
Thanks
Adil

Correct Forum? CGI and Server behaviour on Solaris at system()-call

Hi to you all,
Do not know if i am in the correct forum, but maybe it is a Webserver problem.
I have Sun ONE Webserver 6.1 running on Solaris.
Craete some CGI`s in C.
Now I have a problem with one CGI, which have to call a Shellscript via system() call.
The Client just calls the CGI with some parameters, which will write the informations in a file with some additional informations from a database, after that, the script should be startet and do some printjobs in the background.
The CGI and the Shell-script is working fine. My Problem is, that the system() call always waits, until the ShellScript has finished, so the Webserver send the "data successful written" site after a couple of minutes, it should send it immeditatly to the client, so the session is closed.
I have tried to put the shellscript in background with "&", also with nohup and a second shell script which justs starts the first script, also with all combinations of nohup and "&" for background process.
also i tried with "pclose(popen(SCRIPT,"W");" to call the script, it is always the same, the session will close only, when the script has been finished.
In an other Forum I found an entry, that , however, IPlanet webserver always will do this in this way. The session will be closed, when all called processes has benn fisnished.
Any Ideas to solve my problem?

The web server reads from the CGI program's stdout. It knows the HTTP response is complete when the CGI program closes its stdout.
When you call system(), the child process inherits the CGI program's stdout and keeps it open until it finishes. If you want the child process to run asynchronously from the HTTP response, you should give the child process a new stdout with > /dev/null. (You'll still need to place the child process in the background with &.) Alternatively, you can fork(), close(1), then exec().

Tracing what is happening in the connect() system call

I've been playing around with some of the recipies in dtrace today trying to find out why it takes so long to connect from a linux machine to an ultra 5 running sendmail but I'm not having a lot of luck.
The one thing I can find is that the amount of time for the connect system call to return takes a long time. Here's the dtrace script I wrote (borrowing from Bryan Cantrill's blog):
bash-2.05b# cat functiontime.d
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
#pragma D option flowindent
syscall::connect:entry
/execname == "sendmail"/
self->start = vtimestamp;
syscall:::entry,
syscall:::return
/self->start/
trace(vtimestamp - self->start);
syscall::connect:return
/execname == "sendmail"/
self->start = 0;
exit(0);
This is the output:
bash-2.05b# ./functiontime.d
dtrace: script './functiontime.d' matched 454 probes
CPU FUNCTION
0 => connect 0
0 | connect:return 303079
0 <= connect
I know there are other syscalls going on from the time connect enters to the time it returns but I have no idea how to get them to print.
Any ideas how I can make this script more useful to see exactly where sendmail is getting hung up?

You might also try something like
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
#pragma D option flowindent
syscall::connect:entry
/execname == "sendmail"/
 self->depth = 1;
 self->syscallstart = timestamp
fbt:::entry
/self->depth/
 self->start[self->depth] = timestamp;
 trace(self->start[self->depth++] - self->syscallstart);
fbt:::return
/self->depth/
 this->delta = timestamp - self->start[--self->depth];
 @func[probefunc] = quantize(this->delta);
 printf("delta is %d\n", this->delta);
 self->start[self->depth] = 0;
syscall::connect:return
/self->depth/
 exit(0);
}This will give you the function call flow inside the kernel along with the following:
- on function entry, a time delta since connect was called
- on function exit, how long we spent in the function
- on return from the connect system call, a list of histograms showing the call times for all functions called
You are probably going to want to redirect the output as it gets big.
Also note, I've written this to give the information only for the first call to connect.
Alan.
Alan Hargreaves - http://blogs.sun.com/tpenta
Senior Technical Support Specialist/VOSJEC Engineer
Product Technical Support (APAC)
Sun Microsystems

Exchange 2007 SP3 Install on 2008R2 Fails with "The data passed to a system call is too small"

I'm installing Exchange 2007 SP3 onto Server 2008 R2. I have run this install in compatibility mode and in normal install mode with the same results. Error code 3221684346: The data area passed to a system call is too small. I am installing directly from
the SP3 files, this is not an upgrade. What do I have to do to get this to work?
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Interpreting line <CreateSecureKey:MSExchangeIS\ParametersPrivate> -- ID:31259 --
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] CInsParser::ScProcessLine (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\libs\exsetup\hiddenw1.cxx:1199)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Processing file 'C:\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg.ins', at or near line 77 (CreateSecureKey:MSExchangeIS\ParametersPrivate) -- ID:31111 -- CInsParser::ScProcessLine (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\libs\exsetup\hiddenw1.cxx:488)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Registry file name: 'C:\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg.ins' CRegistryManager::ScProcessFile (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\tools\regmgr.cxx:125)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Filename = 'C:\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg' CBaseAtom::ScRunRegistryFile (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:1379)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScRunRegistryFile
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Filename = 'C:\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg' CBaseAtom::ScAddRegistryKeys (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:1249)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAddRegistryKeys
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] CAtomBaseMDB::ScAddRegistryKeys (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\a_basemdb.cxx:132)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving CAtomBaseMDB::ScAddRegistryKeys
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] CBaseAtom::ScAdd (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:639)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAdd
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Service = 'MSExchangeIS' CBaseServiceAtom::ScAdd (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\basesvcatom.cxx:203)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseServiceAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAdd
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] mode = 'Install' (61953) CBaseAtom::ScSetup (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:535)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] ScSetupAtom (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\exsetds.cxx:897)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] Leaving ScSetupAtom
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [2] [ERROR] An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Deployment.ExsetdataException: An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] [ERROR] An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] Setup is halting task execution because of one or more errors in a critical task.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] Finished executing component tasks.
[2/15/2011 7:24:18 AM] [1] Ending processing.
[2/15/2011 7:42:08 AM] [0] End of Setup
[2/15/2011 7:42:08 AM] [0] **********************************************

I would probably rebuild the host machine. The Exchange installation should occur without any issues, and where a problem does occur that can be an indication of a more widespread problem. Rebuild the machine, reinstall the prerequisites and try again.
Simon.
Simon Butler, Exchange MVP
Blog |
Exchange Resources | In the UK?
Hire Me.
Hello Poster.
I am having the same issue, however it is most likely NOT a host box problem. The above advice is not a fix. I have 3 servers that are cloned with the same setup. 2 were fixed by doing the Vista compatibility trick, this one gave a different error (which
happened to be the same as above). This org was a 5.5 to 2000. to 2003 coexistence with 2007 currently(because the mailbox role won't install). It has something to do with AD or permissions. Server 2008 r2 inherently has problems installing exchange.
Example, having to use vista compatibility to get the mailbox role to install. SP2 patch gives the same error to some people, and also doesn't upgrade the mailbox role properly in some cases. Some people have had luck restarting the IIS admin service, but
that did not solve my copy of this error. I will repost here if I find a solution to this issue...
Same exact setup log for me as well.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Interpreting line <OpenMachineKey:SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services> -- ID:31259 --
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Interpreting line <CreateSecureKey:MSExchangeIS\ParametersPrivate> -- ID:31259 --
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] CInsParser::ScProcessLine (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\libs\exsetup\hiddenw1.cxx:1199)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Processing file 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg.ins', at or near line 77 (CreateSecureKey:MSExchangeIS\ParametersPrivate) -- ID:31111 -- CInsParser::ScProcessLine (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\libs\exsetup\hiddenw1.cxx:488)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Registry file name: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg.ins' CRegistryManager::ScProcessFile (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\tools\regmgr.cxx:125)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Filename = 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg' CBaseAtom::ScRunRegistryFile (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:1379)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScRunRegistryFile
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Filename = 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\Setup\data\mdb_reg' CBaseAtom::ScAddRegistryKeys (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:1249)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAddRegistryKeys
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] CAtomBaseMDB::ScAddRegistryKeys (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\a_basemdb.cxx:132)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving CAtomBaseMDB::ScAddRegistryKeys
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] CBaseAtom::ScAdd (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:639)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAdd
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Service = 'MSExchangeIS' CBaseServiceAtom::ScAdd (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\basesvcatom.cxx:203)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving CBaseServiceAtom(Information Store Service)::ScAdd
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] mode = 'Install' (61953) CBaseAtom::ScSetup (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\setupbase\basecomp\baseatom.cxx:535)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] ScSetupAtom (f:\08.03.0083\sources\dev\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\exsetds.cxx:897)
 Error code 0XC007007A (122): The data area passed to a system call is too small.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] Leaving ScSetupAtom
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [2] [ERROR] An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Deployment.ExsetdataException: An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] [ERROR] An error occurred. The error code was 3221684346. The message was The data area passed to a system call is too small..
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] Setup is halting task execution because of one or more errors in a critical task.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] Finished executing component tasks.
[3/4/2011 10:45:51 AM] [1] Ending processing.
Just curious though, how long is your FQDN? Mine is 34 characters plus whatever exchange is adding to it during setup for this particular string. I found a post with the same error for ISA server and some buffer is only 100 characters for a system call.
ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER 122 (0x7A) The data area passed to a system call is too small. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms681382(v=vs.85).aspx Indicates a msft programming problem.
Outsource Technology Inc. MSFT Professional Consultant

System call failed. Error 2 (The system cannot find the file specified. ) in execution of system call 'CreateProcessAsUser' with parameter ( , NULL, Program Files/sapinst_instdir/BS2011/ERP606/AS-ABAP/SYB/HA/DB, &StartupInfo, &ProcessInfo),

Dear All,
I am getting a below error while doing ehp6 installation on sybase (high availbility )
can any one help me on this..?
An error occurred while processing option SAP Business Suite 7i 2011 > Enhancement Package 6 for SAP ERP 6.0 > SAP Application Server ABAP > SAP ASE > High-Availability System > Database Instance( Last error reported by the step: System call failed. Error 2 (The system cannot find the file specified. ) in execution of system call 'CreateProcessAsUser' with parameter ( , NULL, Program Files/sapinst_instdir/BS2011/ERP606/AS-ABAP/SYB/HA/DB, &StartupInfo, &ProcessInfo), line (646) in file (d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp), stack trace: d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\ejs\ejscontroller.cpp: 181: EJSControllerImpl::executeScript() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\ejs\jsextension.hpp: 1059: CallFunctionBase::call() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\osmod\iaxxbprocess.cpp: 423: CIaOsProcess::start_impl() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp: 238: CSyChildApplicationImpl::start(false) d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp: 262: CSyChildApplicationImpl::doStart() .). You can no
Regards,
Letz..

Hello Mauricio.
Thanks
Two Thinks:
1.- This error appears precisely in the process of creating SAP users including you mention sidadm:
      A.- Execute sapinst
      B.- Installation option is chosen
            SAP NetWeaver CE Production Edition
                    Installation Options
                        High-Availability System
                              Central Service Instance (SCS)
       c.- System ID, Next and appear message error
2.- However, the user manually create sidadm, I gave the permissions you indicate, and the error message is the same
Thanks

Making system calls in java

I want to join some split files into one. In command prompt I use COPY /B file.1+file.2 file to join the files. How can i do the same in my java application. Please show the code which I suppose will use getRuntime. Thanks in advance.

Well if there is a problem with system calls then can
you tell me if there is a class in java for
concetanating files. Not directly.
At present I am joing the files
by reading each byte from the files and writing them
to another file which takes hell lot of time. You should read the files in large chunks. Much much faster.
Thanks
in advance again. Also if you say about sequential
file class then please expalin a bit bcs I couldn't
implement it.Post the code you are having trouble with explaining what it should do and what it actually does.

Unix system() system call in Java

Hi,
system() call in Unix is very helpfull when you need to implement a piece of code that is already implemented in an exsiting utility.
Is there a way to achive a similar functionality?
To put it in simpler words - is there a way, in Java, to call some method that will invoke a Unix shell and will execute the command specified in the string that is past in?
Could you please CC the reply to [email protected]
Thanks,
-Michael

Runtime.exec()
> Could you please CC the reply to [email protected]
Certainly not.

System call docu

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for