System is not clearing article in transfer bin

System is not clearing same SKU in transfer bin having same batch and quantity, one in positive and one in negative. How to clear this SKU from Transfer bin as it is adding more quantity in both positive and negative quantity when ever I am clearing with manual transaction using LT01 for bin to bin.
In Stock per article LS24, system shows the article in 921 storage type & in TRANSFER storage bin. this article is shown twice one with +ve qty (100) & second with -ve (100-) qty. Also this article is shown in 004 storage type & in KF-03 storage bin.
How can i clear the article from 921 storage type & TRANSFER storage bin.
Thanks & regards'
Manoj Gupta

Thanks Lakshman
I am able to do LT01 but in from movement data i have mention qty as 112 and quant as 124672 (which is for -ve qty) and for destination, i have mention qty as 112 and quant as 126762 (which is for +ve qty) and transfer order is created. will it work as i am transferring -ve qty to +ve qty, but your reply says transfer from +ve to -ve.
A) staus before TO creation
Typ StorageBin SC SS PB RB        Total Stock BUn GR Date
SLoc Batch      Re IA CP CR Stock for putaway      Pick quantity Cert. No.
004 KF-03                                  13 EA 30.04.2007
0001 UPLOAD                            0                                 0
921 TRANSFER                          112 EA 28.09.2007
0001 UPLOAD                            0                                 0
921 TRANSFER                          112- EA 26.09.2007
0001 UPLOAD                             0                                0
B) staus after creation of TO
Typ StorageBin SC SS PB RB        Total Stock BUn GR Date
SLoc Batch      Re IA CP CR Stock for putaway      Pick quantity Cert. No.
004 KF-03                                  13 EA 30.04.2007
0001 UPLOAD                            0                                 0
921 TRANSFER                          112 EA 28.09.2007
0001 UPLOAD                            112                              0
921 TRANSFER                          112- EA 26.09.2007
0001 UPLOAD                             0                                112
I have not confirmed this transfer order. can i go ahead with this or need any change?
thanks
manoj gupta

Similar Messages

I just purchased Steve job book , I found out after the purchase , it is in Russian . Why the system is not clear , I like refund.

I purchased Steve job book , I found out after , it was in Russian ,why you were not clear on the page this copy only in Russian. I like refund form apple store.

User to user forum-no Apple here.
This is clearly stated in the terms of service for this forum.
Report the issue through iTunes.

Not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing

For one of the items in PO following transactions are done...
        Mtype   Date            Quantity             Amount
GR   101    06/14/09        1 02.001            887.85
GR   102    06/14/09        102.001-            887.85
GR   101    06/14/09        101.999             887.85
GR   101    07/22/09        102.001             923.61
IR-L            06/14/09        102.001            887.85
IR-L            06/14/09        101.999            887.85
FBL3N: out put
Open items
Doc Type Date                           Amount
WE           06/14/2009 86            887.85
WE           07/22/2009 96            923.61-
Cleared items:
Doc Type Date                           Amount
WE            06/14/2009 96              887.85-
Z9             06/09/2009 86              887.85
WE            06/14/2009 96              887.85-
Z9             06/09/2009 86              887.85
System has not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing for this line item in PO.
What could be the reason these items are not cleared and now how these line
items can be cleared?

Hi,
When the Dr and Cr amount are equal to zero system will automatically clear the line items in F.13. Here the open items are appearing with different amounts due to that system not able to clear.
By passing some manual JV or something you done to make Dr and Cr equal to zero then you clear through F-03(untick post automatically for this clearing in T.cdoe FS00)
Regards,
Sankar

FF67 not clearing documents with similar amounts

Hi Guys,
When we are running FF67 for manual bank statement as a batch input session, the system is not clearing the payments with similar amounts based on the check number.
The batch input session is getting stopped in between if we are running it in foreground and the system is asking us to select the payment document manually.
Why is this happening and how to correct this.
The system should logically clear the item .
Thanks
srikanth.

Assigning External Transactions
In Customizing for Bank Accounting you assign the external bank-defined transaction codes to system-internal posting rules for each transaction type. To do this, choose Business Transactions ® Payment Transactions ® Electronic Bank Statement ® Make Global Settings for the Electronic Bank Statement ® Assign External Transactions to Posting Rules.
Note the following when assigning the transaction codes:
The +/- sign
You can further differentiate external transactions by setting "" or "-" signs for them. If the external transaction code has a "" sign in front of it, it is a cash receipt; likewise, a "-" sign represents a cash disbursement.
The interpretation algorithm
In addition to specifying posting rules, you must also specify which interpretation algorithm should be used. The interpretation algorithm determines whether (and with which algorithms) the system should search the note to payee lines of the electronic account statement for clearing information.

K7N2Delta, cmos not clearing, even with battery out

;( My system is not clearing the cmos, i am getting nothing on my display. the D-bracket says memory problems, i changed a setting in the bios, this has affected the memory, now I can't get into the bios system to reset it.
Graytowers ;( ;( ;(

Quote
Originally posted by graytowers
Safe mode?I cant see anything about safe mode in the book, i have had the battery out ages, over 2 hours, how do I do safe mode?
Hi again,
In my manual it's on page 2-32. Not sure if you have the same one.
Rob

While creating the Transfer Order system is not picking Sale order stock?

Hi All,
In the B2B process the system is not picking the stock from from sale order stock while creating the transfer order? Please suggest.
Summary : Here we are creating the PR in the sale order and STO is created using the same PR to procure the materials from the WM plant to sale order plant. Since here intialy we are moving the stock to our sale order in WM plant and then picking the same. But while creating the Transfer order system is not picking the sale order stock in WM plant.
Regards.

C S Javali
Check in schedule line in transaction flow whether Transfer Req /assembly is checked or not
Regards
Pradeep

Functions not possible because of transfer to OLTP system

Hi gurus,
when i am doing /SAPAPO/VERMER, getting error like "functions not possible because of transfer to OLTP system" can you suggest me and elaboratly.
Thx
moon

turn off transfer to OLTP for both SNP and Deployment via SDP110.

WM::system is not placing the stock another storage bin

hi friends
system is not check fill the stock to another bin ..system is placing the stock in same bin...what are the cofiguration required?
with regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 10:47 AM
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 10:48 AM

hi SAP FC
Iam using putaway strategy is "L" ..storage is determing in the system ..every thing is working fine except placing stock to another bin
with regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 11:18 AM

System not abel to find storage bin .

hI All ,
I am trying to do goods reciept in storage locatrion which is warehouse managed.
required storage type indicator is assigned to material master .
Storage type config is :
Putaway strategy : I (addition to existing stock)
Mixed storage:X (Mixed storage without limitations)
Addn to stock:X (Addition to existing stock permitted.)
ENough storage bins are created in system.
When i am tryng to do GR , system not abel to find the storage bin .
note: Each bin is having some stock of some other material. But we have "Mixed storage" indicator on. so it should not have given error.
Also if i create a new empty bin , then system pulls that bin in storage bin search to put the stock there.
Please guide why system is not abel to find correct storage bin. Is there any OSS note to be applied here .
Regards
Rohit Chavan

With addition to stock strategy, SAP is looking for a bin having stock of the same material. If that is not the case then it switches to strategy "next empty bin".
Mixed storage is not allowed in this strategy.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/c6/f8449d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm

System is not allowing GR through MIGO for generic article in SAP Is-Retail

Hi,
I am trying to do a GR into DC through MIGO for a generic article and its variants but system is not allowing it saying " The generic article is not maintained in DC". System by design doesn't allow to maintain generic article for specific site but it does for reference site. It did not say anything at the time of PO creation but throwing error during GR. Looking for help!
Thanks in advance!
Subhankar

awaiting response.

System not clearing the Payment request items with the payments

HI Everybody,
User getting an issue relating to clearing of the payment request items. In a particular Contract account, it has got 51.75 Pounds of Bank Giro incoming payment. It has contains some 5 items of payment, 3 items of 10.75 and 1 Item of 21.70. The 3 items of 10.75 were cleared 3 payment reqquest items and since there is no due payment requests were there at that time, this 21.70 was showing pending credit item. After two days two payment requests came as due. There are jobs which run daily for FPMA. But this 21.70 is not clearing to this due payemnt requests. I tried to run this FPMA manually for this contract account. But these were not cleared.
Could anybody suggest anything on this why these items were not clearing against each other?
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi
The issue is due to the implementation of support packs. Specifically to do with note 1005708.
siva

LM13: Verification field not cleared after [Enter] key

Hi Experts,
I'm facing the issue as stated in the OSS note 916654 - LM13: Verification field not cleared after [Enter] key. My current system is ECC, that is why the OSS is already applied to the ECC version. But the problem is, i still faced the problem stated in the OSS.
Symptom
In customizing:
- You have defined [ENTER] in destination screen 302 to SAVE items.
- You want to verify the destination bin information.
You use 'Confirm Transfer Order Clustered' RF transaction LM13.
You scan several SUs and press enter.
You press [F4-Next pushbutton] to confirm the associated TO(s).
In the destination screen 302, you scan the verification value for the first item and press [ENTER] key.
==> The item is confirmed correctly but when the system proposes the next item, the verification value of the first item is displayed.
Anyone know how to fix this issue? Pls help.
thanks
Hooi Fung

Hi,
For example itab-matnr is your screen field
in PAI
field: itab-matnr,
module check_matnr_0700.
module check_matnr_0700 input.
move itab_matnr to v_matnr.
endmodule.
in PBO.
move v_matnr to itab-matnr.
a®

Note 916654 - LM13: Verification field not cleared after [Enter] key

Hi Experts,
I'm facing the issue as stated in the OSS note 916654 - LM13: Verification field not cleared after [Enter] key. My current system is ECC, that is why the OSS is already applied to the ECC version. But the problem is, i still faced the problem stated in the OSS.
Symptom
In customizing:
- You have defined [ENTER] in destination screen 302 to SAVE items.
- You want to verify the destination bin information.
You use 'Confirm Transfer Order Clustered' RF transaction LM13.
You scan several SUs and press enter.
You press [F4-Next pushbutton] to confirm the associated TO(s).
In the destination screen 302, you scan the verification value for the first item and press [ENTER] key.
==> The item is confirmed correctly but when the system proposes the next item, the verification value of the first item is displayed.
Anyone know how to fix this issue? Pls help.
thanks
Hooi Fung

Thanks a lot for your prompt answer. Well yes if i clear in the PBO the value gets cleared, but then i wanted to get the next records value into the value field, well the problem got solved in a much easier way i put everything into one chain endchain statement.

Proforma invoice not created for stock transfer order

Hi Experts
while creating a proforma invoice for stock transfer order between the plants we are not able to create proforma invoice , the process is replenishment delivery is created and Wm is also done and the billing with reference to delivery and the item category is relevant for billing with value J, and below is the message i get whilw creating invoice
     Technical data
         Tech. data details
          Client
          Group Number
          Sales Document Number
          Item Number of the SD Document         000010
          Schedule Line Number                   0001
          Counter in Control Tables              00
          Message Identification                 00
          System Message Number                  001
          Output Type                            E
          Message Variable 01
          Message Variable 02
          Message Variable 03
          Message Variable 04
          Group Type                             F
No biliing documents generated
Please suggest.
Thanks

This explanation is not in detail and hence I am not clear about your configuration settings.
First go to IMG Logistics-General => Tax on Goods Movements => India => Business Transactions => Outgoing Excise Invoices => Assign Billing Types to Delivery Types.
There ensure that you have assigned the billing type JEX (assuming that you are using the standard) to your delivery type NL.
Perhaps, you can also try with "D" for your item category in Billing Relevance field but I am not sure this will solve your issue. Try in development client.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Can you check my final setup? Two things not clear yet

Hey guys,
Just when I thought I got it all figured out, something new (at least to me) pops up and raises more questions than answers. So I go on and search more and more and more and now finally I think i've got my setup allmost ready to order. Could you check it and help me out on the final insecurities? Thanx a bunch.
Oh and please, if you have a suggestions to change something I feel is allready o.k (so no questions)...make it a suggestion with enough info to let me make a choice in the matter. Give me a link to a Benchmarksite or e really good test. If the difference is minimal (seconds) on about 10 min. of final footage, than please don't send me on a chase again. My girlfriend would like me to bed with her at the same time now after a week or so
and    I want to order the damn.. stuff and start.
Camera:               Canon XF 100, uses Canon MPEG-2 4:2:2 50Mbps codec
Software:             Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.53
Motherboard:       ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
Question: not to much benchmarks around on the Z68 combined with I 2700. Anyone who uses this board with the 2700 or 2700K step forward please and elaborate.
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600
Memory:               16 Gb    Kingston ValueRAM (2x 8 GB : 2 x 4 GB - DIMM 240-pins - DDR3 - 1333 MHz
or
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600K
Memory:               16 Gb    Corsair Vengeance Blue 16GB DDR3-1600 CL9 quad kit
Question:               I think I’d go for the first option. It’s cheaper and from what I’ve read there not a lot to gain. My videos mostly don’t exceed 10                               minutes of final footage. Anyone can acknowledge this (or not)?
Videocard:           MSI        N570GTX-M2D12D5/OC
Harddisk:             OCZ       Vertex 3 120GB   (sata 600) for my OS
Harddisk:             S’sung WD Caviar Green WD20EARS x3 (sata 300)
To raid or not to raid is still not clear for me. 5 is definitely a no go
I’m thinking I’d put 2 disks in a Raid 0 for more speed and on a regular base BAckup to the other one( and eventually go for external back-up)
Is that ‘o.k. or mmh’, then fine. Is it a ‘oh no, what is he thinking’, please tell me.
Cooler:                Scythe Mugen                 2 Rev. B
Housing:              Cooler Master Xilencio
Powersupply:       Seasonic 620
Monitor:               Eizo       EV2333WH-BK
Optische drive:     LG          BH10LS30
Cardreader:          lexar     LEXAR PROFESSIONAL USB 3.0 DUAL-SLOT READER (for CF’s canoncamera)
Speakers              Creative              GigaWorks T20 Series II
Special :               Contour Design ShuttlePro2
Thanx guys and girls(?) for hopefully making my life easier. Greeting from Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Holland

Scott,
Referring to your post #8.
JCschild wrote:
i have proven this to be false....
This is a big concern to some of us end users who want to put our money where it counts.
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?
Referring to your post #10 above.
they are also end users not system builders and do not have the resources/access we have to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.
How can we really know for sure if we go on word of mouth only, one swears by Ford, one swears by Chevy.
What should us newbies believe,
the feedback from end users who have the real world experience of the behaviour of their systems working regularly with large or complex projects, with strict timelines under time pressure, who cannot afford jerkiness nor delay of any kind, who must afford to save a lot of aggravation caused by less responsive systems, who cannot afford to be held back by hard disk failure or loss of data that took valuable time editing, who need lesser time requirements for regular backups, etc, who know what video editing involves in real practice,
or the feedback from system builders who have “the resources/access to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.” to run hardware tests, but who do not have the experience of high end video editing in practice?
Perhaps it is true that a video card running at PCIe-8x is not much slower than a video card running at PCIe-16x.
I don't know for sure.
What will happen if things change, sooner than we thought, with new drivers and CS6 PP utilizing the full bandwidth, and end users are stuck with systems that don't have the required PCI-e lanes to accomodate more than a 16 x PCI-e nVidia card?
It appears to me that the i7-2600K is indeed a great processor, delivering great value for money, for the majority of general-purpose applications, but
how does it perform when one works with large or complex projects, and multitask, such as having DW do a complete validation on multiple DHTML files, including SSE, running a resize action in PS on a couple of thousand images, encoding large files in FL and PR doing an export to a complex long form BRD?
I was very tempted, and came very close, to buying an i7-2600K for myself, but after learning just how much high-end video editing can demand from a system, I became hesitant to buy the i7-2600K with its platform. I need to be sure that the system I buy has no limitations for the work I need to do with it.
If Intel had video editing in mind when designing the i7-2600K, it would not have had integrated graphics, which is of no use when we need a nVidia card.
Regardless of the fact that according to http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i7-2600k-990x.html the i7-2600K outperformed many pricier products for a higher-end LGA1366 platform (even the $1000 i7-990X Extreme Edition yielding significantly to Core i7-2600K within the majority of general-purpose applications, except during video processing and transcoding, final rendering and a few specific tasks, such as encryption and batch image processing), Intel still positioned this processor as a mid-level processor, for a reason.
Intel knew before release what this mid-level i7-2600K was capable of, therefore releasing it positioned as a mid-level processor, they did so having the architecture to follow up with a mid-level processor that will outperform the i7-2600K, within the same price category, else who would buy Intel's next mid-level processors?
I suspect that for those who are willing to hold out and wait just a bit longer, so they can put their money where it counts, Intel has a pleasant surprise coming soon, and that the new platform will not be evolutionary like it has been for years, but revolutionary with feature improvements from Sandy Bridge like Intel's tri-gate transistor technology, PCI Express 3.0 support and Graphics DirectX 11 and OpenCL support, a bigger graphics performance and bigger CPU performance boost compared to Sandy Bridge.
what makes you think you need a raid controller.... the vast majority of Adobe users do not need one or an 8 drive raid array..
Yes, for those who never need a hardware raid controller, using it for general-purpose applications, the 2600K and its P67 or Z68 platform is nice.
The OP did not specify whether or not he will need a hardware controller, wherefore I cared to post my post #7 above,
nor did he specify his source material, editing style, the nature of his timelines and the time pressure he is under with his projects (other than a mention in his original post of his girlfriend's time request), or how long he intends to use the system before upgrading to the next one.
and why i finally posted the big cup of zip it thread.. to clear out some mis-leading comments.
Scott
ADK
Quoting from your original post in A big cup of "zip it" or the definative final P67 vs X58 answer thread :
Now in all fairless of disclosure the drive benchmarks dropped from our previous tests on X58 which is odd, we are guessing the video card as its ramping up would take bandwidth from the controller even though its supposed to be running 8x.
Scott
ADK
Since you wrote that “the direct replacement for X58 is X79” (System build for CS5.5. Contemplating whether or not to wait for Q1/Q2 2012.), I am eager to learn which exact motherboard(s) was/were used when you ran those previous tests on X58?
Supposing the video card took bandwidth from the controller, even though its supposed to be running 8x, why do you think it would do that as it's ramping up?
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?

System is not clearing article in transfer bin

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for