System is slowing down

I've noticed that since updating from System 10.4.2 to System 10.4.3 my eMac (1.42 GHz 768 MB DDR SDRAM) appears to be slower responding to mouse clicks than it was before. I'm using a Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse and have fitted new batteries without any beneficial effect. The Mouse system pref dialog box indicates battery level good and signal quality high. Any suggestions?

Hello John,
It could be, simply, a lack of maintenance on that
machine. Are you running anything like Macjanitor or
Onyx? They can help greatly.
macjanitor
Onyx
** Please make sure you get the right version for
your OS and read ALL the instructions before running
it.
Hope these help you.
Regards
Ian
iMac. 1.25GHZ. 17Inch.
512Mbs RAM. iSight. Grotty old Desk. 70's Mouse Mat.
Grotty old Curtains too. Mac OS X (10.4.3)
Canon Printer. HK Sound Sticks II. B/band.
Maxtor F/W External.
Thanks Ian - downloaded and ran Onyx. Things have improved considerably!
John

Similar Messages

System has slowed down considerably after updates from Apple. Is SyncServer the culprit?

I use MacBook with preinstalled OS Leopard since April 2009. I have also regulalry updated my computer system using the Software Update application. However, since my last update on 12th Aug 2011, I have noticed that my system has slowed down. There is long pause between every character I type, delay in switching applications, battery dries out quicker, slow response to every command.
I have started facing this problem after updating following software like iTunes 10.4, Safari 5.0.6, Migration Assistant Update for MAC OS Leopard & Quick Time 7.7 from Software Updater. Although, my OS is still leopard.
I noticed on the Activity Monitor that syncserver is using majority of my RAM and reappers even if I stop the process. Some of its subprocess like AddressBookSync also appears and consumes lot of memory. Is this the problem? Though, I never noticed earlier what size it consumed.
I use Microsoft Office suite for Mac and have also checked and deselected all sync services. Yet, the Process (PID 305) continues to appear in Activity Monitor.
I am no techie, and would appreciate quick help to resolve this issue.
Thanks!

I was just about to write the same problem, but I don't have VMware; my laptop is late 2008 was running Snow Leopard (uptodate version).
I've scientific softwares so probably would require a clean re-installation of ML. I MUST MENTION HERE that those software which were written for PPC will NOT work on ML. Just found out that one of my important softwares version won't work on ML; need $500 to upgrade that software .
Therefore, I'd also want to know how can I go back to SL.
I'll let you know how clean re-installation has worked.

System gradually slowing down?

I hope I'm not picking up a topic which has been discussed a gazillion times, but I couldn't find my specific questions after doing some searches. There's a few things I won't to clear about Mac OS.
I have a MBP 2009 with 4GB mem and 500GB HD. It still runs smoothly however it defenitly runs slower than in the beginning. I guess that's a bit normal (more programs, files, mails, junk,...).
I've been a PC user most of my life and switched about a year ago. i'm happy. I always found it necessary to do a reinstall of the OS on a pc every 1-2 years (even though I try to keep my stuff very clean). I'm curious how this effects on Mac OS?
If I would do a reinstall, let's say from a Time Machine Backup (so with all my files, programs, mails, settings etc.), would the system run exactly the same or are there some core OS operations that will run 'smoother' after a re-install (with a TM backup). (I guess for a PC that would be a clean registry and not having 'unknown' processes/programs loading at the back).
Also, is having installed a lot of applications (even when they are not running) slowing down the system. I guess it shouldn't as long as there's enough disk space.
And then finally, do disks slow down after a while. Is having a 10% full HD (much) faster then 60% full (mine is around 60%). also disk defrag is no longer 'necessary' in the latest versions of Mac OS but I just can't imagine that after +1y heavy usage some files are "spread out".. (I'm no expert on file systems so I could expect an answer as: "no, EXT FS doesn't have fragmentation"
Anyways, these are a few doubts I still have around a Mac OS system slowing down:
-reinstall OS (this one particularly since i'm thinking of upgrading to new laptop, and wonder if I should start from scratch and copy manually or use my Time Machine backup to reinstall)
-having many apps (not running)
-disk fragmentations, or just hardware slowing down
cheers!
Philippe

If you have not already done so, run Disk Utility's "Verify Disk" & "Repair Permissions" steps on your HD. All utilities that do permissions repairs use exactly the same built-in function of the OS to do so, so it doesn't matter if you do this through Onyx, Disk Utility, or Disk Warrior.
The verify/repair disk step is a bit different: all utilities use the same method of detecting file system errors but (for example) Disk Warrior rebuilds file system directories from scratch (including perfectly useable ones), which often can repair damage Disk Utility can't, & has a side benefit of simplifying directory structures. Once, back when HD's were much slower & less sophisticated than they are now, this could make a large difference in file system performance. Now, it is debatable that an otherwise OK directory structure would show a noticeable improvement.
IOW, if your HD's file system is healthy or only has minor problems, Disk Warrior won't do much of anything of real value that Disk Utility can't, but it can be a lifesaver if Disk Utility can't repair certain kinds of problems it can detect.
The same is true for file fragmentation -- unless the drive is full of very fragmented files, defragmenting it probably won't show much real world improvement.
The number of inactive applications on your Mac makes almost no difference in performance. What can easily do so is the number of active processes running at any given time. As a former PC users, you may not fully appreciate the difference between quitting an app & closing all its windows. Closing all an app's windows is somewhat like old TSR (terminate & stay resident) DOS programs -- it is still using some system resources, although not as many as when it is active. So, if you aren't already doing so, remember to quit applications you do not plan on reusing for a while.
Just as importantly, don't load down the OS with a lot of unnecessary add-ons, especially ones that modify the user interface in some way. Each of these things uses some system resources; a few can destabilize the OS, causing recoverable code exceptions you may not be aware of without searching through system logs but still creating extra work for the CPU.
If or when you remove add-ons or applications, be sure to check the documentation for the proper way to do that. If you don't, you may leave behind files that impact performance.

Does locked documents in sm12 can cause system to slow down in reading

hi experts,
When I check locked entries in sm12, i found some locked entries which are already past 8 hours and sometimes more. Do those entries contribute to the system's slow performance? When should I delete those entries? I hesitate to delete locked entries and kick users out of the system because they maybe editting some documents and have'nt saved them yet.
Thank you in advance for your response.

Hello,
System Lock mechanism doesn't slow down system. But sometime it's required to delete the entries of hanged uses login processes, which can be done through SM04/AL08 as described by GURUS.
But sometime though you try to delete from these T-Code the process doesn't get delted, then you can proceed for the below mnetioned two steps:
1. SM50 and delete the corresponding process through PROCESS > CANCEL WITHOUT CORE
PROCESS > RESTART AFTER ERROR -> NO
2. If you have access to OS level, then the same can be deleted by following command:
kill -9 <process no.>
In case any issue, please feel free to revert.
Reagrds,
Nilutpal

Shutting down iTunes causes system to slow down

When ever I shut down iTunes my computer slows down considerably. When I check windows task manager under processes it shows iTunes to be still active and taking up about 90% of my system resources. I have to shut down iTunes in task manager to solve this problem. Does anyone know what may cause this?

When your mailboxes were moved to Office 365, your directory should have been updated so it pointed to the mailboxes in Office 365, not to your local Exchange 2003 mailboxes. Just thinking this through, I think your consultant didn't do a complete
job. With the Exchange 2013 PowerShell tools, you should be able to update your 500 accounts so they point to the proper system for the mailboxes.

System becomes slowing down!

My desktop environment is Gnome3 and use Radeon HD 3200 Graphics.
The whole system starts become slowing down and slowing down after I watched video on Internet or in local computer.And the totem also has some bugs.This problem puzzles me for some days.Does anyone encountered this case?
By the way,the system is all right when I don't watch the videos.
Last edited by hzyg (2011-05-06 14:01:34)

Sorry, don't use Gnome.
The system is going to slow down because something is using processor bandwidth, or because of page faults (disk thrashing caused by excessive swap operations in low memory situations)
Investigate your processor bandwidth with tools like top or htop, and check your memory with free (I've heard tell of significant memory leaks)
Report back what you find.

[SOLVED] System suddenly slowed down

This is my first post on this forum, so - Hello, everybody
My problem occured yesterday:
1. I've made a big upgrade (don't remember exactly, but kernel was upgraded for sure)
2. I've noticed a serious slow down of the system: web surfing (firefox), AUR packages compiling (took almost 10 minutes to compile subtitlecomposer-git!) and other performance problems.
It had never happened before. My computer is Dell E6400 with 2 GB RAM and up to yesterday everything was working fine. Maybe I can deal with my problem on my own, but I just need some clues, where to look for any information.
It's really annoying
Well, I also made some mess last time - I've tried to install MATE and Gnome with both: LightDM and GDM. At present: everything is removed, and I'm using only KDE.
Seems like system start-up time didn't change, so I think the problem source is on "higher level".
htop is telling, that RAM consumption is 743 MB (only KDE + firefox with 4 tabs running), and processor load oscillates between 3 and 30% (when switching from Firefox to yakuake).
Thx in advance for any help and sorry for poor english.
Last edited by krzychusss (2013-05-10 11:29:02)

I've checked with iotop - nothing strange.
I will try old kernel and let you know.
Thx.
EDIT: Unfortunately, downgrading kernel didn't change anything. Still looking for solution
EDIT #2: Strange thing... I've just changed theme and some look-n-feel settings in KDE Settings and it works fine now. Also KDE was upgraded recently, so maybe this fixed the problem.
Anyway, it works
Thx.
Last edited by krzychusss (2013-05-10 11:28:43)

I upgraded to Maverick system really slowed down, All file access 10-15% slower. Solution?

After I upgraded from Mountian Lion to Maverick (OS10.9) accessing files and directories on external drives slowed down by at least 10 - 15 %. I get the color wheel and a long wait almost 25% of the time. Is there a solution other than downgrading to 10>8?

Fixing a Mavericks Installation Problem
How to manage a failed OS X Mavericks installation | MacFixIt - CNET Reviews.
Try these in order:
1. a. Resetting your Mac's PRAM and NVRAM
    b. Intel-based Macs: Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC)
2. Restart the computer in Safe Mode, then restart again, normally. If this doesn't help, then:
     Boot to the Recovery HD: Restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the
     COMMAND and R keys until the Utilities menu screen appears. Alternatively, restart the computer and
     after the chime press and hold down the OPTION key until the boot manager screen appears.
     Select the Recovery HD and click on the downward pointing arrow button.
3. Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions: Upon startup select Disk Utility from the Utilities menu. Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions as follows.
When the recovery menu appears select Disk Utility. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list. In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive. If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU and return to the main menu. Select Restart from the Apple menu.
4. Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion, Mavericks: Reboot from the Recovery HD. Select Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion, Mavericks from the Utilities menu, and click on the Continue button.
Note: You will need an active Internet connection. I suggest using Ethernet if possible because it is three times faster than wireless.

Probook 6540b; more memory causes system to slow down dramatically

Hi,
I have a Probook 6540b with Intel i5 and I'm running Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit.
I bought the notebook with 4GB RAM installed. I heard from the supplier that the computers tend to be "buggy" with more than 2GB RAM, but I needed the memory so I didn't mind much.
Recently my computer slowed down significantly. Taking ages to boot up and just as long to open even an internet browser.
Remembering what the supplier told me I removed the extra 2GB RAM and my computer suddenly responded as if it was brand new.
I would like to be able to have 4GB RAM available, but not at the cost of performance.
Is there a solution available?
P.S.. The extra 2G RAM is a Kingston module - if that could be of any help...

Turns out it was a problem with the battery and removing the RAM was just a fluke... Sorry...

I suddenly have no sound. Also system has slowed down.

My IPad has no sound and has slowed down.

1. Close all inactive apps in the Task Bar. Double-click the Home button and hold apps down for a second or two and tap the minus sign to close app.
2. Try a reset. Hold the Sleep and Home button down for about 10 seconds until you see the Apple Logo

System has slowed down

Lately my iMac has slowed considerably and sems to hang up often when merely opening Yahoo or any website. It is not a download issue.
I get the little rainbow wheel that pops up and turns forever and sometimes I cannot get online at all after it begins. Even opening this forum took about 20 seconds as the wheel rotated and waited and waited.
I am using Lion and it is updated. It happens in Safari opr Firefox or even in opening email. I have repaired disk permissiomns often, I clean with "CleanMyMac" on a regular basis but at times I have to simply restart the system whjich does not always solve the problem.
Any ideas how to solve this issue with the little rainbow wheel and inability to open pages?

The OP is using Snow Leopard (per his profile), your instructions assumr he is on Lion (10.7.x) therefore they will not work.
To the OP: Insert either the original OS X Install Disc that came with the machine or your Snow Leopard upgrade DVD into the SuperDrive. Then restart the machine, when you hear the startup tone hold down the Option key - choose the DVD - Select the language - Click the Utilities Menu - Select Disk Utility - Repair HD until no errors appear - Repair Disk Permissions - Quit Disk Utility - Quit Install - Restart computer.

RMI server causes the system to slow down and crash with socketException

Hi,
My RMI server application is a simple rmi server which invokes a JNI method once when I invoke through my client application. Server is left as it is after invoking the JNI method. After around 12 hours, server stops running with the following exception
ZoneInfo: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.6.0\lib\zi\ZoneInfoMappi
ngs (Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service)
ZoneInfo: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.6.0\lib\zi\ZoneInfoMappings (Insufficient s
ystem resources exist to complete the requested service)
Dec 29, 2008 10:09:34 AM sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop executeAc
ceptLoop
WARNING: RMI TCP Accept-0: accept loop for ServerSocket[addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,por
t=0,localport=2161] throws
java.net.SocketException: socket closed
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(Unkno
wn Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Dec 29, 2008 10:10:35 AM sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop executeAc
ceptLoop
WARNING: RMI TCP Accept-0: accept loop for ServerSocket[addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,por
t=0,localport=2161] throws
java.net.SocketException: socket closed
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(Unkno
wn Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Dec 29, 2008 10:12:36 AM sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop executeAc
ceptLoop
WARNING: RMI TCP Accept-0: accept loop for ServerSocket[addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,por
t=0,localport=2161] throws
java.net.SocketException: socket closed
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(Unkno
wn Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Dec 29, 2008 10:15:37 AM sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop executeAc
ceptLoop
WARNING: RMI TCP Accept-0: accept loop for ServerSocket[addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,por
t=0,localport=2161] throws
java.net.SocketException: socket closed
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(Unkno
wn Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Dec 29, 2008 10:20:40 AM sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop executeAc
ceptLoop
WARNING: RMI TCP Accept-0: accept loop for ServerSocket[addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,por
t=0,localport=2161] throws
java.net.SocketException: socket closed
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(Unknown Source)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(Unknown Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(Unkno
wn Source)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
# An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment:
# Internal Error (4D555445583F57494E13120E4350500075), pid=1352, tid=1828
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0-b105 mixed mode, sharing)
# Can not save log file, dump to screen..
# An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment:
# Internal Error (4D555445583F57494E13120E4350500075), pid=1352, tid=1828
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0-b105 mixed mode, sharing)
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
# http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
Does anyone has any idea?
Regards
Nidhin

Your RMI server invokes a JNI method as you mentioned. It seems your system resource is become very low as from the exception from "ZoneInfoMappi"
(Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service...I would suggest the following
1- remove the JNI method invocation and replace by a simple method which does nothing special ( counting etc..)
2- Run the RMI sever and stress test it again
If you see the RMI server is working well after 12 hours, then your native method is leaking i.e consuming the system resources ( RAM etc..)
You should profile the running RMI server using jconsole
Regards,
Alan Mehio

System slow down - help!

I don't think I'v ever had this problem before - the whole system keeps slowing down to a crawl - every app, the cursor, every thing -
I just did the disk utility maintenance yesterday (from the Repair partitioin), cleaning permissions & verifying / repairing the disk...
somehow give me some suggestions, the cache, the memory...?
should I zap the P-RAM,or whatever that step is where you restart holding COMAND-OPTION-P-R ??
help!
w

Ok, there are a few things I would try.
1. Download this free application from the app store called iBoostUp Click Here. Once you do that launch the application you should run the first four things (The quick clean, Disk optimizer, Network optimizer, and memory booster).
2. If it is still slow launch Disk Utility, then select you computer's hardrive and press verify disk (Not disk permissions). When that is finished press repir disk.
3. Yes, if it is still slow now zap the P-ram. When you hear the startup chime at startup hold down command+option+R+P, then count, stop this process after you have heard 3 startup chimes.
4. If it still is like this, consider buying the premium version of iBoostUp Click Here. Now you can run all of the tests and processes in the application.
5. Now is the time to bring your computer to Apple (Make an appointment).

Large Photoshop file has caused system slow down.

I have Dual 2.0Ghz G5 which has worked very well since I got it last Spring. Just recently however I've had some slow downs. There are a number of things that I've noticed such as more frequent spinning beachball and font redraw issues.
These issued started since I was working one a massive Photoshop file. I was doing work on a Trade Show booth which eventually resulted in a 10Gb Photoshop file! I realized I probably should have taken steps to reduce the size of the file but that's neither here nor there. Despite the size of the file I was still quite impressed with the performance of my machine. That said, I've found the general performance of the machine since working on this file to be diminished.
I've done all of the typical maintenace items such as repairing disk and permissions via Disk Utility, clearing caches and running Maintenance scripts using Cache Out X, MacJanitor and Tiger Cache Cleaner, but still the performance of my machine has taken a hit.
It's only since this has happened that I've started launching Activity Monitor to try and determine if there is something obvious going on which is hogging resources or not. This for me has raised questions of what is "Normal" for some common tasks. Presently kernal_task is using under 5% of my CPU with 50 threads running which seems like a reasonable number. But it is also using almost 110Mb of RAM and 1.35Gb of Virtual Memory. Both of those numbers seem quite high to me, but I admit that I never looked at them before so I have no gage as to whether these numbers can be considered normal or not.
By all measures the machine still performs pretty good, but as I use this machine every day I know that it's not the same as it was prior to working on that large file. Is there something else related to Photoshop, temporary files, application caches or anything like that, that I should take a look at?
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Dual 2.0Ghz G5 Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Hi Troy,
First I would try using a separate HD for the scratch disk.As PS tries to read and write,it has to compete with the OS as it tries to hit its swop files. If Version Cue is on, turn it off.Get rid of any virus checking apps.Check your Ram.If you haven't allowed Tiger to run its cron scripts on a regular basis,and only do periodic maintenance, I would take the time to do an Archive and Install, or even wipe the HD,zero it and install tiger again. This I realize is a drastic measure,time
consuming, and a pain.But if your whole system is slowing down?? Or if you get a new drive set it up to be your primary drive first and test your system on it before moving any of your PS files over from the old HD.Use the old HD as scratch disk
Have you included the use of other utilies to check your HD? Drive Genius, Disk Warrior, TechTool Pro.No Norton utilities allowed.Hope this helps as there are a lot of places to look for the problem.

Slow down issue with Premiere CS4 on a Mac pro

I am having a similar slow down issue with Premiere CS4 on a Mac pro, but I don't have bloated prproj file size.
Here is what I am working with:
Mac Pro intel quad core 2.8ghz
OSX 10.6.7 Snow Leopard
6Gigs RAM
3TB storage between 4 drives, each drive with about 50% free space
I am editing a 10 minute HD video from avchd files. The edited video is very heavy in photoshop files with a variety of different fx including green screen. The system has slowed down to almost a standstill. Anytime I move the playcurser, or try to do any action, it displays the spinning top "thinking" icon and takes 15 seconds to several minutes to unfreeze. I am often forced to force quit and I have gotten unexpected quits several times. The program also freezes on startup frequently.
No other programs are running. When I export with media encoder, it took about 4 hours to complete. The last 4 or so photoshop images I added seemed to tip the program over the edge. It had been slowing down some, but those last few really dropped the processing speed. Before those additions, export took 30 min to 1hr.
I did delete the render files (did not check if the file size was bloated beforehand, oops) but it has not significantly affected my performance.

Do you need all of those extra pixels in the stills? Are you panning the full 4976?
Two things to consider are that if you using, say a 1920 x 1080 Sequence Frame Size, you can only see that at any time, regardless of how large the images are in pixels. If there are extra pixels, i.e. the Pan is not using all 4976 pxls., I would Scale to just what you need in PS, prior to Import.
If you are doing any Scale in PrPro, its Scaling algorithms are not as efficient, as those in PS. [Note: CS5 and 5.5 are a major improvement on that statement.]
With many large stills (the max for CS4 is 4096 x 4096, if there ARE extra pixels, pushing those around will use up resources, and quickly. As a test, some years back, I was working on a "photo wall," and was using 4000 x 4000 images. The workstation had no issues with slowness, until I got to the 5th large still. By the 8th, the Project was too slow to edit. I had to wait for everything. Luckily, I have AE, and it handles large stills much more efficiently, and much differently, than PrPro. I just moved to an AE Comp, and completed the Project, finishing up n PrPro, after I Exported from AE.
Just something to think about. With Scaling in PrPro, this is one time, where bigger is not necessarily better.
Good luck,
Hunt

System is slowing down

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for