System Landscape using multiple clients scenario for BW

Hi Friends,
I have a scenario where I want to use multiple BW clients based on single server.
I have made client copy of the development server and want to transport the objects
to the target clients.
I am aware that such a scenario works fine in R/3 and infact i have used it
.But in BW when i hit RSA1 I get an error message "you can only use client(010)"-my development client of which copy was made.
The client copy system is 102.
Now I read a thread on sdn which said change client entry in RSADMINA table .I changed it ,but I think its cross client table and hence RSA1 is neither workinging in client copy or the parent system.I reverted back entry in client 102 and saw that development client working again fine like before.(also RSADMINA) value changed in 010.
I have tried to fix it by creating appropriate mappings using SCC4/BD54/SALE/WE20/RZ10
.Also created mapping WE20 for Partner profile and assigned the logica system.
Is it possible to have such a system landscape?
Can anyone give some useful suggestions?

Hi..thanks to all of you....
I think this thing boils down to table RSADMINA where you maintain entry for your client.
The primary key there is 'Customizing ID' and when you specify there "BW" .You can't make another entry for another MANDT with another customizing id.
Whenever u login to any other client and you change entry of MANDT it is going to be reflected to all the clients and thats what is the issue.So you can't mantain mulitple entries as you can't enter two customizing ids. there.
Infact there are many reasons in the background as well which the sap note mentions like common number ranges..etc.
Lastly ..Ofcourse as Siggi said you can have another R/3 or CRM system etc on the same server but no two BW clients.I think SAP should not allow client copy for BW on the same server..it will help some bad efforts
Thanks for the support everyone.
Regards,
Rakesh
Edited by: Rakesh Kumar on Jun 15, 2009 12:08 PM

Similar Messages

How to configure TMS landscape using three clients of same system?

Hi All,
I have to design a prototype for linking satellite systems to Solution Manager. To work on the Change Request Management module of Solution Manager.
Here, I need a Development - Quality - Production landscape to be configured to link it to Solution Manager, but I have only one system available to do this.
I have the clients 410, 420 and 430 in the system XYZ. Now, how do I simulate the three system landscape in STMS for the three clients mentioned above.
I tried using many attempts, but it is not working out. I could figure it out that this is possible by activating "extended transport control" parameter for each system, in STMS.
Also, there are some specific needs to configure this landscape for linking to Solution Manager, the comments are shown below:
"Transports are supported in the standard transport layer of each client. When you configure transport routes, note that only consolidation routes that are assigned to the standard transport layer of the relevant exporting client are taken into consideration. For each exporting client, exactly one target client and one target group are permitted.
We recommend that you assign exactly one development system to a production system, and that these two systems are connected by exactly one unique transport track.
If a development system and a production system are connected by more than one transport track, this may lead to inconsistencies within the transport distribution.
This type of transport configuration cannot be supported by Change Request Management, and may cause inconsistencies within the tools involved."
Please suggest me, as how to proceed to configure STMS for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Anil Santhapuri
Message was edited by: Anil Santhapuri

Hi Anil,
Can you please share how you could setup the 3 system landscape with diferent clients on one system using Target Groups?
Thanks,
Poorna

HCM Processes and Forms : Using single Form Scenario for Multiple Countries

Hi ,
I have a requirement to design a HCM P&F form ( Single Process, Single Form Scenario ) to support multiple countries. Form fields should be visible/invisible based on the country ( derived from the login Manager). please help me with the following questions.
1. Is it right way to enable/disable the fields in the same form scenario for multiple countries ( Approx. 20-25 countries)
2. Is there any limitation to no. of fields on the form? does the form performs well with multiple dynamic conditions?
3. If yes, what is the best way to do this? through Java Script / Back end Generic Service?
Thanks in Advance,
VR.

Hi VR,
1. Is it right way to enable/disable the fields in the same form scenario for multiple countries ( Approx. 20-25 countries)
-You can use same form scenario or process for multiple countries if you are using fields based on international structure HCMT_BSP_PA_XX_R*. If you intend to use country specific fields then you may like to use different form scenario for different countries.
2. Is there any limitation to no. of fields on the form? does the form performs well with multiple dynamic conditions?
- As such there is no limiation for the fields.Yes, form performs well with multiple rule configurations.
3. If yes, what is the best way to do this? through Java Script / Back end Generic Service?
I interpret you would like to derive & show fields based on same backend logic, in that case you should generic service.
If you want to show fields based on manager's logon then you should also use authorization BAdi.
Regards
Pooja

E4200 v2 - Uses multiple MAC addresses for the same device

This unit seems pretty good at first but on looking at the Web interface I noticed that it was using multiple mac addresses for the same device and showing devices on the lan on the Wireless side and other odd things.
After a week of running it the home server network started to get erratic, it would seem to all point to dns and dhcp issues in the router.
Seems the V1 had the same issues that they did not fix on this.
The Cisco connect software shows 5 devices the Web based utility shows 3??.
Its pretty bad that they charge nearly $200 and cannot be bothered to finish the unit or address the issues that were in V1.

I am afraid I didn't get the clear picture of the issue mentioned in the post. Could you please elaborate a little bit? If you connect a device/computer wired and then later you connect it wirelessly. It is obvious that you would get to see two different MAC addresses for the same device, one for the LAN adaptor and other one for WLAN adaptor. If that is what you are referring to?
Secondly, may I know, what issues did you face with DNS and DHCP in the router? Is it not able to resolve the DNS or something else or DHCP is not sending IP address to the clients?

How to use multiple VCI strings for lap 1300 and 1200 (option 60) in one pool?

Hi All,
Hope to you a very happy new year,
I have two differnt LAP 1300 and 1200 in my network and I need to add theme to the WLC,
I successed to add one of theme by the option 60 in the DHCP pool at the Core SW,
So my quetion is below:
How to use multiple VCI strings for lap 1300 and 1200 (option 60) in one pool?
Thanks in Advanced,
Ahmed,

To add to Scott's post. Option 60 would be useful if you needed to put certain types of AP on specific controllers. Otherwise, no real need to use it for the most part.
Though, I do recall an issue a few years ago that some windows machines had issues getting DHCP if option 43 is being returned.
Now, on an IOS switch, you can only configure one option 60 per DHCP scope
HTH,
Steve
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered

Error: Could not create system variants in multiple client system

Hello ,
I am trying to make changes to the variant CUS&_FINAL_AT in se38 , but the error message is coming while saving .
error :Could not create system variants in multiple client system
Could you please help?

Hi Huynh,
Did you ever figure out how to add custom fields to an e-recruit infoset? I need to so same and would love a heads up on how.
Leena

How to use multiple tape drive for single filesystem on single client.

Hello All.
I want to backup single filesystem with multiple tape drive.
Incase of Symantec veritas netbackup "NEW_STREAM" for multi-stream backup.
Backup client has a single backup filesystem like /data1 directory with 4 LTO6 drives.
/data1 directory doesn't have a sub-direcotry, just present a files.
If /data1 directory has a sub-directory like /data1/aaa, /data1/bbb, /data1/ccc , Is it possible to use multiple drives?
Please anybody answer the questions.
Thanks advanced.

See how to use multiple tape drive from single client when I want to backup single filesystem?

How to use multiple clients within JCO?

Hi,
I'm pretty new to configuring Web Dynpro's with it's JCO connections. I have the following question.
We are using one portal (SAP EP 6.0_640 SP15) and one R/3 system (SAP ECC 5.0) with multiple clients (multiple customers who are all using the same portal).
Do I have to deploy a web dynpro for each client and maintain it's JCO connection for each client?
Or is there another way how I can set this up?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Dave Arends

Hi Dave,
Do I have to deploy a web dynpro for each client and maintain it's JCO connection for each client?
Or is there another way how I can set this up?
You dont need to deploy a web dynpro for each client . You can use same JCO connection for multiple User ID's ( multiple Clients mean multiple user ID's on the same portal ).
If this is the case then single JCo connection is enough to pull data from R/3 and show on portal page .
Thanks,
Nanda

Problem using multiple Client Certificates

Hi folks, I had (mistakenly) posted an earlier version of this question to the crypto forum.
My problem is that I have multiple client certs in my keystore, but only one is being used as the selected certificate for client authentication for all connection�s. So, one connection works fine, the rest fail because the server doesn�t like the client cert being presented.
I have been trying to get the JSSE to select the proper client certificate by making use of the chooseClientAlias method. (init the SSL context with a custom key manager that extends X509ExtendedKeyManager and implements the inherited abstract method X509KeyManager.chooseClientAlias(String[], Principal[], Socket))
But, still no luck.. the JSSE is not calling in to the my version of chooseClientAlias, and it just keeps presenting the same client certificate.
No clue why, any thoughts on how to get the JSSE to call my version of chooseClientAlias?
Thanks!
SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance("TLS");
sslContext.init(createCustomKeyManagers(Keystore, KeystorePassword),
            createCustomTrustManagers(Keystore, KeystorePassword),null);
SSLSocketFactory factory = sslContext.getSocketFactory();
URL url = new URL(urlString);
URLConnection conn = url.openConnection();
urlConn = (HttpsURLConnection) conn;
urlConn.setSSLSocketFactory(factory);
BufferedReader rd = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(urlConn.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = rd.readLine()) != null) {
     System.out.println(line); }
public class CustomKeyManager extends X509ExtendedKeyManager
    private X509ExtendedKeyManager defaultKeyManager;
    private Properties serverMap;
    public String chooseClientAlias(String[] keyType, Principal[] issuers, Socket socket)
        SocketAddress socketAddress = socket.getRemoteSocketAddress();
        String hostName = ((InetSocketAddress)socketAddress).getHostName().toUpperCase();
        String alias = null;
        if(serverMap.containsKey(hostName)){
            alias = serverMap.getProperty(hostName.toUpperCase());
            if(alias != null && alias.length() ==0){
                alias = null; }
        else {
            alias = defaultKeyManager.chooseClientAlias(keyType, issuers, socket);
        return alias;
.

Topic was correctly answered by ejp in the crypto forum..
namely: javax.net.ssl.X509KeyManager.chooseClientAlias() is called if there was an incoming CertificateRequest, according to the JSSE source code. If there's an SSLEngine it calls javax.net.ssl.X509ExtendedKeyManager.chooseEngineClientAlias() instead.*
You can create your own SSLContext with your own X509KeyManager, get its socketFactory, and set that as the socket factory for HttpsURLConnection.*
Edited by: wick123 on Mar 5, 2008 10:26 AM

How to use pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet with XI 3.0

Hi all.
 I am working in Comgroup Shanghai co. ltd. which is partner of SAP China.
 We have a potential customer who use RosettaNet as their Supply Chain EDI system.
 I would like to make a demo for demostrate the pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet RNIF 2.0 packages.
 Where can I find such guideline ? I have checked the article: implementing RosettaNet with XI 3.0, but it cannot help me.
 Another question is how I can develop my own scenarios for the RNIF standards which are not included in XI RosettaNet business package ?

Hi Andy,
See the instructions below after you installed the RosettaNet STK.
Below given is the sample config for PIP3B2 Scenario. Part I is using STK and Part II is using 2 XI systems.
Part I. Test Using STK
In your XI ID:
1) Define both the parties 1) Shipper(Your Partner) 2) Receiver(Your company) with identifiers like DUNS Number.
2) In ID goto>Tools>Transfer Integration Scenarios from IR-->select the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" from the drop down list.
3) Follow the 4 steps in the config wizard.
4) While creating your CC, create it from the channel template delivered with the RosettaNet BP.
 4.1) Specify the URL for STK which should be in the following format
http://<STK Server>:<port>/rosettanet/servlet/listenerServlet?userId=<Party Name>
 4.2)In the location fields, enter your location and your partner location.
In your STK
1) Start the RosettaNet STK.
2) enter the UserID<Partner Name in XI>
3) Select the Test Scenario, 3B2V01.01-AdvanceShipmentNotification-0001-Scenario-Shipper
4) Enter Global Business ID(DUNS Number) and Location ID for both the partners. These fields should be same as in your R/3 Party configuration.
5) Enter the URL as follows:
http://<XI Server:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
If everything is configured correctly as mentioned, you should be able to test your single-action scenario.
Part II Test using another XI System
For these follow the steps above for XI Config.
Configure one XI System as PIP3B2 Shipper using the Scenario "PIP3B2_Shipper" and config wizard as mentioned above.
Configure the other XI as PIP3B2 Receiver using the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" and config wizard.
In the Url field, specify the URL as follows:
http://<XI host>:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sam Raju

UWL - System doesnt support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee

Hi all,
we have some tasks coming from our back- end system. When a certain task needs to be substituted to a colleague, no problem ... for one task. When we wish to assign him a second task, we get following message :
System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/0b/1fc20097b74c41b38621ec2a9454bb/frameset.htm">help.sap.com - substitution</a> :
 System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee
For example: User can only assign one task to an assignee at a time in workflow.
Collaboration Task does not support other tasks at all.
Is substitution only limited to one task per person? What would be a workaround? It's possible to create for each combination of tasks a definition in the back- end which is available from the substition drop down list, but this is not what our customer would like to see.
Many thanks,
Kevin

Hi Boris,
we're using the WebflowConnector.
Thanks,
Kevin

Using Multiple Hard Drives for iTunes Storage

I am running out of room on my current hard drive and want to use a new external hard drive to add space. My problem is I want to use both hard drives for storage (not the same music). Is this possible as I have only been able to direct iTunes to one hard drive? Thank you.
Dual G5 Mac OS X (10.4.5) 400GB Raid set

When you change the location in iTunes preferences what you are doing is telling iTunes where ripped music should be put. It isn't changing where iTunes should look for music that is already in the library. So go ahead and change the location to where you want music to be stored from now on. iTunes won't lose the other music. (At one times my iTunes library was spread over 4 drives.)

How do I use multiple local workspaces for the same website in VS2013?

For quite some time I've been using VS2010 with multiple workspaces mapped from the same TFS branch to test different variants of a website in parallel. The internal web server (Cassini) seems quite happy to run multiple versions and simply maps a new port
number for the second and subsequent instances that start up.
We are now looking to move to VS2013, so have to use IISExpress since the 'internal' web server is no longer provided.
How do I configure things so that if I open a single workspace, IISExpress runs against that workspace using the default port number (specified in the solution), but if I open a second instance in a different workspace it correctly uses a new port number
and working folder. Do I need to invoke IISExpress using the command line (presumably from each workspace) and specify the relevant defaults or is there some way to enter this in the local config file for IISExpress?
My initial attempt at editing to config file resulted in the 2nd and subsequent instance using the same physicalfolder as the first instance, presumably because the speficied site name and port number are the same!

Hello,
Thank you for your post.
I am afraid that the issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Based on your description, I suggest that you can consult your issue on ASP.NET forum:
http://forums.asp.net/
or IIS forums: http://forums.iis.net/ for better solution and support.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How can I use multiple client side vlans in ACE?

In CSM we have a default-gateway per Client VLAN, in ACE there is no equivalent command! How does the ACE handles routing in this situation?

Hi,
Talk about a deja-vu. I was faced with the exact same challenge about a year ago.
Basically, I think you're looking at two options:
1) Firewall-consolidation - Consolidate your four firewalls into one, having one dedicated interface towards the ace and route all your vips using the ace as
    next-hop. It looks like your firewalls are virtual (but I don't know), so it's duable. But I don't know if this is even an option for you.
2) Per. clientvlan context - Context A for vlan1001, Context B for vlan1002 and so on. Each context handles clienttraffic for the respective vlan and since
    each context handles it's own routingtable, simply use the firewall-address as your default route. But from your drawing, it looks like your server-vlans
    are all connected to the same ace, so you will need to split that up. Assign each servervlan to an ace-context as you do with the clientside-vlans.
Well, a third option would be NAT in your firewall. Unless you have a specific need for the original client-ip the reach the ace, you could nat incoming clientsessions in each of the firewalls to an interface-address on that firewall, hence the ace will see the clientrequest as originating from the firewall and since ace has connected routes to each of the firewall, it wall return traffic to respective firewall and leave it to him to return the traffic to the client.
Since each firewall will present the packets with a unique NAT'ed address, you can apply different policies, parameters etc. for that NAT-address, if this is required.
hth
/Ulrich

SRP547W, How to use multiple WAN IPs for port forwarding?

Hi folks,
We've run into some difficulty trying to take advantage of multiple WAN IPs in conjunction with the SRP547, and I'm hoping someone here can help out or at least tell us that we're going to need to buy a different router...
What we're trying to acheive is the ability to port forward from our distinct public IPs to different internal servers. Looking at the options under Port Forwarding it looks like we can only configure forwards at the "WAN interface" level, but our problem is that we can't work out how to set up separate interfaces for each of our Public IPs...
Our ISP provides us with a fully managed NTU/router with a single "Internet" ethernet port, which we can use by statically configuring IPs on our end. For this configuration this port has been directly patched to the WAN ethernet port on the SRP547W.
We have been allocated a 255.255.255.248 (/29) subnet, giving us 5 usable IPs after the ISP's gateway address is taken into account, like so:
a.b.c.208     Network Address (/29 subnet)
a.b.c.209     ISP Gateway
a.b.c.210     IP1
a.b.c.211     IP2
a.b.c.212     IP3
a.b.c.213     IP4
a.b.c.214     IP5
a.b.c.215     Broadcast Address
On the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the following details for IP1
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
The next step (I would have thought) would be to add a second sub-interface, using similar info for IP2
VLAN ID:               4000 (Chosen arbitrarily)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.211
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
When we try to do so however we get:
Fail!
Conflict with Ether_WAN2 interface address type
I should mention at this point that we're running on firmware version 1.02.01 (023).
Any suggestions on how we can proceed?
Is there a CLI or other method of configuration that might work if the web interface won't?
Thanks,
Tim.

OK, I've seen reference to this solution before but not much in the way of details. Perhaps you can spell out how this ought to work, as the Software DMZ doesn't behave as I'd expected it to.
As before, on the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the details for IP1 with a /29 subnet.
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
We'd now like to expose a server function on IP2, let's say LAN details for this server are:
VLAN:                  3000
VLAN IP Range:         192.168.1.1/24
Server IP:             192.168.1.10
Server Port:           80
So first we turn on Software DMZ:
Status:                Enabled
Public IP:             a.b.c.211
Private IP:            192.168.1.10
WAN Interface:         Ether_WAN2
My understanding, based on what you've said, is that this should expose the whole server to external access via IP2. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work this way - we don't seem to have any access at all. Perhaps there's a default deny rule on the firewall?
Just to be sure, I tried creating a rule to allow HTTP traffic to the server in the Advanced Firewall page.
In Interface (WAN):    All
Out Interface (LAN):   VLAN.3000
Source IP:             0.0.0.0
Source Subnet:         0.0.0.0
Destination IP:        192.168.1.10
Destination Subnet:    255.255.255.255
Protocol:              TCP
Source Port:           Any
Destination Port:      Single:80
Action:                Permit
Schedule:              Everyday
Times:                 24 Hours
Still no dice. What am I missing?
Cheers,
Tim.

System Landscape using multiple clients scenario for BW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for