System landscape with one missing Hana (2 Hana / 3 ECC)

Hi all,
We’re currently working in a landscape with only 2 Hana: one for DEV+Integration (to be connected to 2 ECC : DEV and INT) and the other for the production system (connected to the prod ECC). Any idea on how we can deliver our tested developments on the same environment (the dev) for integration testing ?
On the DEV system we would like to have a development version of each object connected to the DEV ECC and an integration version of the same objects connected to the INT ECC.
We can copy all objects from one package (dev) to another (int), change the authoring schema and adapt all the inside references. I’m looking for an easier way, ideally with delivery units (which should be the way we will deliver our views on the production system).
Any input will be appreciated…
Regards,
Fred

Dear Beate;
Thanks for your question!
One of the key advantages and strategic benefits from our SAP SLcM solution is the fact that we are directly/automatically connected with core (academic supporting) backoffice processes like HR and Finance.
On the HR side we share for example the Organizational Management foundation and at the Finance side we are directly tapped into the core financial processes powered by the FICA engine of ERP.
If there are no strong/solid compelling reasons (beside the emotional ones ) to have a point-solution installation of SLcM we always recommend to have SLcM running inside the existing available business suite/ERP. Why?
Direct, automatic integration with HCM (HR)
Direct, automatic integration with FICA (Finance), from tuition fee to collection and distribution to general ledger)
Re-use of key supporting business suite engines like:
1. Workflow
2. Authorisation module
3. DMS
Maintenance of only one system instead of multiple ones
You avoid building and maintaining extra 'interfaces' between ERP1 and ERP2+SLcM.
Etc.
Hope this helps!
Let me know if you have any other concerns or want to have a call, please drop me an e-mail.
Kind regards
Rob
SAP IBS Solution Management (Higher) Education & Research.

Similar Messages

ChaRM - possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project?

Hi,
can anyone tell me if it is possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project. One landscape for developing and testing the Change Requests and another one for developing and testing the Bugfixes.
Thanks,
Martin

As Rick, mentions, there's no default way.
Having said that, there's nothing stopping you from doing it yourself. You can add a kind of language selector to the layout and set that for every html5 output. With some JavaScript, you can have the user switch between your outputs. It would look like content categories, but you'll have build it yourself.

Transports on system landscape with no test environment

Hi,
Please share your experience about transporting from BWD to BWP. I have normally worked with BWD, BWQ, BWP, where we have the chance to test our transports on BWQ before moving the perfect changes to BWP. What precautions should I take when working and dealing with the landscape with no test instance?
Thanks
"Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate." ~ Henry David Thoreau, US Transcendentalist author (1817 - 1862)

Hi all,
Certainly I see and hear that smaller companies don't have enough funds to implement 3- system landscape, but I don't see why they would want to do that - better save money then and just do ABAP R3 reporting if all you will have is just implementing one module. Aren't you suppose to have sufficient funds in order to maintain and have SAP R3 and BW running? When they start wanting to implement more modules, then it will get clumsy and unstructured. They would have to spend more effort in doing the workaround and dealing with an unruly environment.
Thanks
"When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
"Nothing is easier than to denounce the evildoer; nothing is more difficult than to understand him." ~ Fyodor Dostoevsky, Russion Literaturer (1821 - 1881)
"Be smart and know who you're dealing with...But again who wants to" ~ Anonymous

STMS Route configuration in Three system Landscape with DEV,QA and PRD

Hi
We have Three system landscape.i.e DEV,Quality and PRD
Before Somebody configured the STMS by selecting standard two system land scape ( Dev and QAS)
We Have Installed Production Server And Added into Existing STMS Configuration
Now Three Systems Showing, In Import Overviw Screen
How Can I Create Route Between Three systems
What I am Asking Is Without Delet Old Roots
Can i Create it are Not
regards
NSN

Refer these links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/1c/2ddc0901db11d284870000e8a57770/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/44/b4a0137acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Ravi

Need help in configuring CHARM with R/3 System landscape with seven systems

Hi All,
we are planning to configure CHARM for our R/3 landscape.our current STMS includes seven systems.in the current STMS the transports flow as below.
D20->C20->C21->C22->C23->T20->P20
we require the transports to move in the same way as stated above even after CHARM is configured
1.please let me know if we can configure CHARM with seven systems.
2.if yes, how would the import happen( ie Action for import appears for all systems?).
Regards,
Anand Reddy

HI andy,
the transports will move in the following order.
D20(DEV)->C20(Consolidation)->C21(integ)->C22(reg)->C23(unit)->T20(final test)->P20(production)
transport will start in D20,then imported C20 followed by C21,C22,C23,T20 imports and finally reach P20
the systems are not in parallel they are one behind the other
Anand Reddy

Indirect Role Assignment with HR-ORG in a system landscaper with CUA

Hi all,
we have 2 SAP systems:
1) SAP ECC6 (with composite roles)
2) SAP HR with PA and OM
We would like to assign SAP ECC6 roles through HR-OM.
Since HR-OM is not on the same ECC6 system, we would like to try the logic: HR-OM -> CUA -> ECC6
There are several documents that describe this situation (ex. SCUR351).
From PFCG point of view, we should create a composite role in CUA system which include simple roles of child system.
If we try to create a composite role in CUA central system, we can insert only simple roles available in central system (and not in child).
Any experience on this scenario ?
Pros vs cons ?
Are the different possible scenarios ?
Many thanks...
Andrea

Whole idea of CUA is to manage your roles and users centrally, on the contrary you can manage the roles/profiles by setting up the attributes for the CUA thorugh Central user Management console - SCUM Transaction.
CUA has its own pros -
Central rep,Users Sync,Role Provisioning statergy - Global composites(consists of individual child roles) Distibuted model -Provisioing at individual child systems for roles, etc.Central user store,easy maintenance.
on the contrary - change documents is always a concern ( because cua uses - interface Ids or the RFC ids to push the idocs from cua to child system), CUA maintenance while system refresh - Copied distribution models have to be deleted and re-created, system backups has to be defined per you distribution model, password maintenance if defined global then Child systems act as inactive nodes, reading the roles into cua which are created in childs so as to establish a pointer to that system.
It also depends on the number of systems you have in your landscape so that you can calculate the overhead and then have a Go -no-Go decison on CUA.
Overall, I consider CUA as a good approach provided we streamline the process of provisioning, de-provisioning per the cua standards.
Rakesh

Change Request Flow In a Three System Landscape --- PLZ DO REPLY

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP and have this doubt;
Suppose we have a three system landscape with DEV, QTY and PRD systems in it.
Say we create a new change request in DEV system. So to transport it to QTY we will release that request from DEV using T code se01 .
Now the request will come in QTY systems queue and we will login to the appropriate QTY client and import this request into the QTY system.
No my basic doubt is, after the testing in QTY how do we move this request to PRD system ?
Do we again release this request from QTY system using se01 or we need to go at the OS level in the QTY system and manually add this change request in the PRD system buffer ? ( Please send if any reference link is there)
I will really appreciate any info in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mandeep

Hai Mandeep,
 First Thing,
 -->If you are maintaining a common transport directory,the released change
 request will be exported in that common transport directory..
 --->Now you just enter in to the server(which is Transport Domain
 Controller).
 --->In that go to Import Overview,now your QA server has one import req.
 you just click the req. and import that req..
>Now if you want to import the same req int o PRD.,Enter in to PRD
 server.Go to tcode STMS_IMPORT, In the top go to
 Extras>Other req.>add..click this and add that particular
 req.that you want to import in to PRD server..
 --->select that req and import that req...
Thanks & Regards,
Gopinathan.T

Transporting a request in single system landscape

Hi,
I our single system landscape, we are using the scc1 t-code to transport a request from dev client to prd client,then it showing a message like target client is productive and protected against client copy for this reason every time we are changing the production client settings. please give me suggestions how to transport a request in single system landscape with out using scc1 t-code.
Regards,
Reddy

Olivier,
Are you sure SCC1 is just for client copy? I dont think so.
Client Copy transaction is SCCL for a local copy and SCC9 for remote client copy.
SCC1 allows to transport local requests within different clients, of course depending of what the transport request contains you can copy something simple or a lot of data (yes, I know, the title says something, but see the functionality).
I'm agree is not a good practice to have DEV and PRD in one server, but maybe he is using it for testing purposes? I saw different cases in the past and sometimes they had DEV and QA in one server, maybe this is the case.
Anyways, lets help him on his question.
Reddy, if you have any question, just post it.
Good luck,

QA Refresh in 2 System Landscape

Hello,
All these while I have been working on 3 system Landscape.
Now, I will be working on a 2 System Landscape. One of the 4 Clients in the DEV System is the QA Client. The other System is the PRD which just have a single client as Production.
Usually in a 3 System Landscape we do a full System Copy from PRD -> QA during Refresh.
Now, how to go ahead in a 2 System Landscape? Ofcourse I will have to do a Client Copy, but then what happens to the Client independent data and the Repository for QA?
Thanks

Thats what i told:
First export all clients from your DEv(except QAS client)
then do a system copy from PRO to DEV(here you will get PRO client into DEV)
Then import all exported clients(here you will get your all DEV clients)
Now your DEV system will have Exact copy of PRO with all other clients too.
Generally PRO client have huge data, that is not possible to do a remote client copy/client export and import.
So i suggested above method...
Regards,
Nick Loy

Solman configration for system landscape having virtual buffers

Hi All,
We are having a system landscape with virtual buffers in the TMS.TMS transport path look like this
*Dev -> Virtual Buffer -> Quality -> Virtual Buffer -> Production*
We need to configure ChaRM for this landscape. We are able to get virtual system details in Solman and created the project. But ChaRM is failing while we try to import the transport requests to Quality.
Can you please guide us to configure solman for this landscape.
Thanks in Advance,
Shaju

hi,
if the goal is to have a better control of what is going to QA
the move to the QA happens anyway in 2 steps
you might want to control the release in your development (via solman). In this case just control the action "test transport"
you might want to control the import in QA. In this cas you manually import in QA
I don't see the added value to have an extra virtual system
SOLMAn will support your process with real system. You can send to a virtual system why not (we are using this technique for other reason), but it is a dead end
TMS won't support your landscape scheme because the move of a transport to the next system is related to the import from the previous system. If it is a virtual buffer you won't have the possibility to import it virtually.
Unless a Guru knows a magic trick I am convinced a virtual path won't work in our case.
I hope my explanations were enough to explain the constrains we have
best regards

System Refresh with HANA & HANA live (side-car) data

In a scenario where HANA live co-exists with HANA DB (aka side-car approach), trying to understand the impact of system refreshes to HANA Live content. Is there a method to choose only HANA DB specific data for the refresh i.e. excluding HANA Live data? If we use the backup/restore method to refresh QA from PROD it will bring Prod data over for HANA Live too. Is there a way to export QA HANA Live data prior to the refresh and re-import it post DB refresh?

Sorry I thought it was clear, let me explain.
HANA with SLT, is a replica copy of ECC tables. If you copy HANA Prod back to QA then SLT will no longer be operational.
You could re-enable SLT but you would have to re-initiate replication which would wipe out all the HANA tables, thereby making your system copy worthless.
If you don't re-enable SLT then you won't be able to do any testing or any table changes into QA.
So really there is no choice, you need to copy ERP Prod and HANA Prod, or just copy ERP Prod and re-initiate replication.

Multiple Schema Creation with One Source system Via SLT

Hi all,
we have BW on HANA environment at our company premises, with SLT server installed
So, my Question is that is it possible to create more than one schema in HANA system with one Source system
As an example, lets say, ECC (Client 601) Source System has been connected to HANA via SLT and created Schema called SCHEMA_1 and again i want to create SCHEMA_2 by connecting same ECC (Client 601) source System.
please help me to short this out?
Thanks
Mirana

Hi Mirana,
Yes, it is possible to create more than one schema in HANA system with one Source system.
Please go through the Official SAP LT document for more details @ page number 13
http://www.saphana.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/1811-102-5-5419/SAP_LT_Replication_Server_for_SAP_HANA_SPS05_Over…

ChaRM transport route, one development, 2 QA, 2 PRD system landscape

Hello,
We have a customer who has an ERP system with a transport route which is the following:
One single Development system which feeds, 2 QA systems and then 2 PRD systems.
We are to implement ChaRM and we want to customize the tickets so that every time you execute the import action of a transport request into QA (and later into PRD) both systems QA1 and QA2 are updated and later on with PR1 and PR2.
We would like to know how to support this scenario in Solution Manager using ChaRM. How do we set up the logical component at SAP, how we define the transport route and layers, and how we define the actions in the SDHF ticket.
I appreciate your help.
Regards
Esteban

Hello,
We set up a testing environment for change request management. In a solution manager we created five clients. One single development which feeds two quality systems, and final two production system. As it was said in the thread we used transport groups in the transport route. The development system feeds this transport group which feed to import queus in quality systems. We tested this transport route and transports worked well and arrives into both production 1 and production 2 systems.
Then created a logical component for that landscape, with five sytems. Then we created a maintenance project using that logical component. We created a maintenance cycle and then a task list was created which shows two delivery system, and the two productive systems. All the groups have the right actions.
However when we created a SDHF correction the system creates the task list only for 3 systems, not for the five of them.
we see that only action groups are created for development, quality 1, and production 1. No entries for quality 2 and production 2
We try to run the action which is in the general part of the task list to execute the import in multiple systems, it cames out with the correct selection of importing in quality 2 system because it is the transport group. However an error is raised saying that the actions for quality 2 are not there in the task list which is true. Finally, as short term solution, we were able to import into quality 2 and later on pr1 but done manually in the stms transactions which is not what we want to do.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:06 AM
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:07 AM

403 Error during communication with System Landscape Directory from RWB

Hi,
I've got a new install of PI (XI 7.0) SPS 10 and am getting an error whenever I try to access the SLD from RWB or Integration Builder. The SLD is running on the same server as XI.
I've been through the various config guides (strangely there doesnt seem to be one specifically for PI/XI 7.0), to configure RFC destinations, checked users are not locked etc.
I'm thinking it's probably a VA / Authorisations issue, but could use some ideas!
Here's a few errors just for reference (and future people searching!)

Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)
Unable to read XI domain from the SLD. Monitoring cannot therefore be configured. Error message: com.sap.aii.rwb.exceptions.BuildLandscapeException: Error during communication with System Landscape Directory: HTTP response code: 403 (Forbidden)
No System Landscape Directory exists. Unable to generate the landscape
Unable to read software component versions from System Landscape Directory "my.server:51400" (have tried 8014 also)

Thanks,
James.

Hi,
1) Activated all services
2)Go to SU01 > type PIISUSER and reset the user's pw
Check out this might be helpful
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/89/05793c05f0807be10000000a11405a/content.htm
403 ERROR
Check this note might help you 961880
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

ChaRM with 4 system Landscape.

Hi, 
We are trying to implement ChaRM in a four system landscape 
 
AFD --> AFQ --> AFI --> AFP 
 
defined logical components, project, created maintenance cycle. U'gent correction works fine. 
 
but for regular correction, we are able to create TRs release it, but not getting imported into AFQ and of course further steps are not happening. When the status is "Development Completed", we perform "Log on to system", this pops up with a dialogue with options 
 
AFQ 200 
AFI 100 
 
to logon to system. 
 
This is the only clue we got. 
 
When we perform the actions, the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production". It doesn't obey the phases maintenance cycle as well, irrespective of the phases the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production" 
We are missing some minor thin's. 
 
Have we defined the system roles properly? IF not, how does the flow works perfectly fine with respect to U'gent correction. 
 
Please help. 
 
 
Regards, 
Ragu 
 

Hi Ragu,
I have a few questions here:
1. What normal correction type are you using - SDMI or SDMJ
2. What roles are assigned to the systems in Logical Components? I believe they are setup as Target Systems and thats why you get the pop-up with both systems when you execute 'Logon action' after 'Development Completed'
3. What is the STMS setup for this landscape?
4. Urgnt should behave properly coz it takes the shortest route to production. Can you check the tasklist of Urgnt and see if there are only 3 systems there?
Regards,
Kriti Bhalla

System landscape with one missing Hana (2 Hana / 3 ECC)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for