System not clearing the Payment request items with the payments

HI Everybody,
User getting an issue relating to clearing of the payment request items. In a particular Contract account, it has got 51.75 Pounds of Bank Giro incoming payment. It has contains some 5 items of payment, 3 items of 10.75 and 1 Item of 21.70. The 3 items of 10.75 were cleared 3 payment reqquest items and since there is no due payment requests were there at that time, this 21.70 was showing pending credit item. After two days two payment requests came as due. There are jobs which run daily for FPMA. But this 21.70 is not clearing to this due payemnt requests. I tried to run this FPMA manually for this contract account. But these were not cleared.
Could anybody suggest anything on this why these items were not clearing against each other?
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi
The issue is due to the implementation of support packs. Specifically to do with note 1005708.
siva

Similar Messages

The operation could not be completed because an item with the name xyz already exists

I am trying to make a click and drag backup on an external FAT 32 drive to compliment my Time Machine backup (long story) and I've done this each time by dragging my critical folders into the drive. I get a message asking me to stop, replace or skip, and whether to apply to all items. i click replace, apply all, and let it go.
however, one stubborn folder refuses to comply. every single time I click and drag a group of folder that includes that one, I get a message saying "the operation could not be completed because an item with the name xyz already exists" even after I selected the the "apply all" prompt. at which point, the Mac stops transferring ALL the other files.
I figured, OK, i'll just transfer the other folders individually and then deal with this folder later. so I do that, and once I get to the offending folder, I try to transfer just that one folder into the drive. no good; I get the operation message again. I decide to just transfer the contents of the folder, rather than the folder itself. No good, I just get the operation message about one of the folders within the main folder.
anyone know the cause, or at least a fix?

If you've installed a system modification called "TotalFinder," remove it according to the developer's instructions after backing up all data. Log out, log back in, and try again.
Otherwise, open the Info dialog on both the source and the destination volumes. What is the Format of each? For example, it might be "Mac OS Extended (Journaled)".
For some other possible solutions, see:
operation can't be completed because an...: Apple Support Communities

Validation of Down payment request amount with the PO amount

Hi,
I am MM consultant my issue
When user entering down payment in F-47
for a purchase oder the system is allowing the amount more than PO amount which is logically incorrect.How can I prevent this ?
Regards,
Melby

Hello
Restriction in DP advances are not normal. Unless tolerence limits are maintained by the user.
In any case, the DP amount would have no relevance to the PO amount. The system does nor know, against which PO the amount is paid, and the limitations of PO.
Ideally, in normal situations, an advance sometimes is larger than the PO amount. This happens when the business knows about long term relations which could occur in future.
Ignore this and inform client to process DP request after checking the open POs for the vendor.
Reg
assign points if useful

Sales doc items with the status CLSD ARE being selected for month-end

We are working to improve month-end processing time for Sales Orders We use SAPKKA12 to set CLSD status on line items
SAP Help states: be sure that the status CLSD (closed) is set for all sales document items that you do not want to include in the period-end closing process. The sales document items with the status CLSD are then not selected for processing in the period-end closing process. Use report program SAPKKA12 to set the status.
This use to work (in 4.0). I have been on other projects and just brought back to this after several years (now in 5.0). Testing today shows that orders with CLSD status are being selected for month-end process.
Any ideas why this is so? System is selceting over 300,000 orders when well over half of them are set to CLSD. I do get a message that the order is not relevant to processing, but selecting the order and logging the message take time. and the logs are VERY long.
thanks

Does any one else have this issue that Sales documents with status CLSD are selected by RA (KKAK)?
In just one of our jobs, i get this Basic List
Perform actual results analysis      31273
Not relevant                                                 103894
Error                                                        2306
Objects Selected                                    137,473
75% of the orders are CLSD. and the system is still counting them. (we do not out put information messages)
I do understand that the orders are not analyzed, but all documentaion states that CLSD status is not selected, and in our 5.0 system, they are selected. In our 4.0 system, they were not selected.
Does this truely work for anyone in a 5.0 system?
Thanks
Althea

Rounding PR00 in header level (+1 item with the same material)

I have currently a problem, my customer prints the invoice by sumarizing the materials (line items with the same material and pr00), but by doing this the unit price by the quantity is not correct because the rouding at line item is not the same when we put all together.
e.g.
line 1 - qty = 7,5 and pr00 = 0,15 ->total of 1,125 -> stays in line item with 1,13
line 2 - qty = 7,5 and pr00 = 0,15 ->total of 1,125 -> stays in line item with 1,13
in the layout we have a total of 2,26, but in real we must have 2,25 if we see this like a header group.
Can we have a rounding solution for the PR00? like we have for discounts using a rouding routine?
thanks in advance,
joao

in the layout we have a total of 2,26, but in real we must have 2,25
Since the issue is only in output of billing document, you have to take the help of ABAPer and modify the smart form.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppres

I am looking at an issue with users not getting specific group policies.
After searching a number of client computers I found that the following error
The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppressed.
I can find the folder in the Sysvol folder on all of the domain controllers.
The issue with end users seems to be that the proxy settings for internet explorer is not being applied.
Potential problems?
one folder in sysvol entry is empty
\\<server>\SYSVOL\<domain.name>\Policies\{E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}\User\microsoft\IEAK\LOCK
or is this our issue
The old method of configuring proxy settings to Internet Explorer 9 has changed?
https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2530309?wa=wsignin1.0
http://thommck.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/the-new-way-to-configure-internet-explorer-proxy-settings-with-group-policy/

Hi all
In administering this policy I am a little confused.
We have a policy that distributes proxy settings in the internet explorer maintenance settings section - however when opening this policy up in GPO editor the internet explorer maintenance section is not present.
I plan to apply the settings via User/preferences/control panel settings/ internet settings (or registry settings from article) however I am unable to edit the settings for internet explorer maintenance and these will persist. Ideas????

Issue while clearing open items with a payment advice

I have created a payment advice to clear open items on a customer. As part of testing, I have created 2 items in the payment advice. Both are short payments for the open items.
In the first line item, I am short paying an open item by entering the reference number. (XBLNR) in AVIP-XBLNR.
In the second line item, I am short paying an open item by entering the assignment number. ZUONR in AVIP-ZUONR.
I am using F-28 for my clearing. I have noticed a very strange issue where in the program will place the residual amount in the residual amount column against the appropriate line item for the first item. Where as for the second item, it does recognize the open item and brings it in the clearing screen but does not put the residual amount in the residual amount column. Due to this, the new line item in the clearing document does not have a link to its original line item.
This has started happening all of a sudden. I am unsure what might have caused this. Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks

Include - MF05BFO0
FORM op_pruefen
Context:
          WHEN 'K'.
           ENHANCEMENT-POINT mf05bfo0_02 SPOTS es_sapmf05b.
Create an enhancement here and add this code
               IF SY-TCODE = 'FB1K'.
                     T041A-AUGLV = 'AUSGZAHL'.
               ENDIF.

HT5767 My mail all of a sudden would not allow me to delete messages in my inbox saying, "couldn't be copied to "Messages" because an item with the same name already exists." Found it duplicates the message I wanted deleted in trash.

Still using the @mac.com mail address and up to date on everything, but have not gone to Maverick. All of a sudden Mail wouldn't let me delete. Said that title of email was already in trash. And sure enough it was. Clicking on the help button on the message gets Nothing.
The selected topic is currently unavailable.
The topic you were trying to view could not be found.
"couldn’t be copied to “Messages” because an item with the same name already exists."
Any ideas. My mail is not tied to gmail etc.. just all by it's lonesome.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, or by corruption of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled on some models, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain iMacs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

The vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

Hi All,
While executing t.code FBL3N,the vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
Please let us know why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
Thanks
Ram

HI,
By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
Click on New Entries -
Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
Give the gl account number and execute.
After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

On a Mac v10.6.6 Firefox v3.6.13 Right click on Google Map does not bring up the drop down box, with the first item being directions from here, the right click does work on Google map when using Safari

On a Mac v10.6.6 Firefox v3.6.13 Right click on Google Map does not bring up the drop down box, with the first item being "directions from here", the right click does work on Google map when using Safari

Your above posted system details show outdated plugin(s) with known security and stability risks.
*Shockwave Flash 9.0 r999
Update the [[Managing the Flash plugin|Flash]] plugin to the latest version.
*http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
In Firefox 3.6 and later versions you need the Next-Generation Java™ Plug-In present in Java 6 U10 and later (Linux: libnpjp2.so; Windows: npjp2.dll).
http://java.com/en/download/faq/firefox_newplugin.xml
See also http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/jre/manual-plugin-install-linux.html

The PyramidVille game in Facebook is not loading.I have no problems with the other games.I'm receiving the message" Forbidden 403" CSRF Verification failed.Request aborted. More information is available with Debug= True

The PyramidVille game in Facebook is not loading.I have no problems with the other games.I'm receiving the message" Forbidden 403" CSRF Verification failed.Request aborted. More information is available with Debug= True edit

Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
* Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Offline Storage (Cache): "Clear Now"
"Remove the Cookies" from sites causing problems:
* Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Reload web page(s) and bypass the cache.
* Press and hold Shift and left-click the Reload button.
* Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
* Press "Cmd + Shift + R" (MAC)

VERY URGENT - NOT TALLYING OF RECON.A/C WITH THE TOTAL OF LINE ITEMS

Dear FI Experts,
Since the total balances as per individual customers' balances ( thro FBL5N with one Recon a/c ) which is not tallied with Recon.GL for Local debtors if we see the same thro FS10N, please guide me immediately to reslove these problem as I need to give the detailed customer balance report to my management.
My observation of the same is " one customer a/c if it is changed from one recon. a/c to another recon a/c after transaction made ( ie. from Local debtors to Foreign debtors ) " , line entries after changing of recon.a/c which is not updating with respective Recon.GL.
Please revert back with some solutions which will be rewarded.
Thanks
G. Jana

Dear Team,
your observation is right ,
in the customer line items select the two rec. accounts old and New Rec. it will match with your FS10N balance.
regards
radha

Messages could not be moved to the mailbox "Trash - "122730.emlx" couldn't be copied to "Messages" because an item with the same name already exists.

Cannot move messages from mail to trash. Get the following message: messages could not be moved to the mailbox “Trash — “122730.emlx” couldn’t be copied to “Messages” because an item with the same name already exists.

I just started having the same problem but have found no solution.

Delete PO Line Item with Down Payment Existing in Header

Hi SAP Guru,
We have a PO with 6 line items. A down payment was set up in the header level and is already paid to the vendor in the previous year, 2014. There is no Goods Receipt yet for this line item in the PO. One line item in the PO will be cancelled. When we cancel the line item, it would not allow us to do so because there is already a down payment posting. How do we cancel the line item of the PO with downpayment?
Thanks,
Matt

Dear Matthew,
Now if you want to delete the PO line item and down payment exist for the line items then you need to reverse the down payment and delete the PO line items.
If you have paid to vendor in previous year, then plz take help of your FI person if any way you create debit note in system against that payment. If possible
In Standard way, you need to 1st reverse the clearing items appearing in FBL1N. After this the line item will appear in open items. Then cancel down payment request in FB08 and then try to cancel PO line item.
Regards,
Priti.

SharePoint Search Service upgrade to 2013 fails: "Inner Exception: An item with the same key has already been added."

Here's the situation:
Upgrading a SharePoint Server 2010 Search Service Application dB to our SharePoint 2013 SP 1 development environment, using the Management Shell
Running the following commands:
$applicationPool= Get-SPServiceApplicationPool -Identity 'SearchService_AppPool'
$searchInst = Get-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceInstance -local
Restore-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceApplication -Name 'SearchServiceApplication' -applicationpool $applicationPool -databasename 'SearchServiceApplicationDB' -databaseserver SERVERNAME -AdminSearchServiceInstance $searchInst
Creates the search dBs (crawl, links, analytics) successfully; however, in the end, I get....
"Exception: Action 15.0.107.0 of Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchAdminDatabaseSequence failed."
Looking at the ULS logs, I find the following:
Inner Exception: An item with the same key has already been added.
at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Insert(TKey key, TValue value, Boolean add) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.FindAndFixExistingManagedProperties() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.InstallManagedProperties(Boolean
upgrade) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.OOTBSchemaDefinition.Upgrade() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.UpdateAllOOTBProperties.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade()
Exception: Action 15.0.107.0 of Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchAdminDatabaseSequence failed.
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPDatabaseSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Upgrade.SearchDatabaseSequence.Upgrade() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.Upgrade(Object
o, Boolean bRecurse)
Anyone encounter anything like this during their search upgrade process? I'm not honestly even sure what duplicate value to look for at this point, if I were to run a SELECT Id, ClassId, ParentId, Name, Status, Version, Properties FROM Objects on
"SharePoint_Config" in SSMS. Any insight or opinions on the matter are welcome; and thanks to those who choose to reply to this, in advance.

Hi ,
You can enable the ULS log on verbose level (note, remember to reset to default level after finished troubleshooting) for more information per the following article, then check there should be more useful message for helping solve the issue.
http://www.brightworksupport.com/enabling-verbose-logging-to-compare-against-c/
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/12c99279-d3aa-46de-bc57-d5d250692ff0/upgrade-of-search-service-application-from-2010-to-2013-failure?forum=sharepointadmin
https://www.simple-talk.com/blogs/2014/04/22/sharepoint-2010-to-2013-search-service-application-upgrade-issueaction-15-0-80-0-fails/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/biyengar/archive/2009/10/27/psconfig-failure-with-error-an-item-with-the-same-key-has-already-been-added.aspx
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

System not clearing the Payment request items with the payments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for