System not picking data correctly in S_PL0_86000030

I am trying to process report S_PL0_86000030 . While trying to view the call up report for particular GL a/c in a particular fiscal year and co code, we are getting the data for period 1 to 3 for line item reports . The data displayed is correct in the development server but not so in prodn server.
In the prod server, the system is also picking the data for period 4 (July) even though the selection is for period 1 to 3 at the line item level.
The same display is correct in the development server

Similar Messages

Manual BRS system not picking the doc for clearing the payment

While processing Manual bank statement if i am using referance doc no system not picking doc no for clearing the bank payment. So that after finishing BRs I am matching the doc manually, in f-04. This is taking long time for processing. Anyone can tell me why ref doc no not working and to make it to work, or else any problem is there to use the field. please solve my query.
Edited by: MANISFICO1 on Aug 1, 2011 11:49 AM

Hi:
Please follow as given and hopefully you will be able to resolve the issue.
1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 in Algorithm field , save.
2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL which you are using for outgoing postings..
In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post.
In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
Save and post it. Now it should work.
Regards

Not picking up correct Exchange Rate

Hi,
I have some queries that are not picking up the correct exchange rates.
The entries look like they are there in TCURR, but the query isn't using them.
Is there any program that can run a DB consistency check on currency tables?
Br,
Sonni

Dear Sonni,
First of all are you sure that the exchange rates are coming correctly from Source to BW.
If not do the below mentioned procedure.
RSA1 --> goto source system --> right click on your source system --> select Transfer Exchange Rates --> select the mode of transfer and excute it
hope it will solve your problem.
With Regards
Arun
Edited by: Arun Aravapalli on Mar 17, 2010 1:08 AM

CS2 Eye dropper and clone tool not picking up correct colour from image.

Hello everyone, Can anyone help me please. I have an iMac with 0SX 10.4.4.
Plenty of Ram and hard drive space. In using CS2 the eyedropper and clone tools will not pick up the exact same colour from the image that I require. It is always lighter in shade and has on occasion been white. Any help in solving this problem will be much appreciated.
Yours in anticipation, Geoff Walter.

>The eyedropper is picking-up the color as rendered in RGB on your Monitor...
Really? Not from the pixels in the file? So the same pixels are reported with different values depending on monitor setup? This is about how the eyedropper reports pixel values, not about how they are rendered to the screen, is that correct?
Just to be sure here, this is so even with the eyedropper set to point sample?
Al
Edit: Or do you mean that this is a known problem with 0SX 10.4.4. and Photoshop, in which the values are picked up from the monitor and not from the file data?

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Create release not picking data from Requisition table

Hi All,
I have imported release data from 11i to R12 through Requisition import program. Data got imported successfully. I have updated BLANKET_PO_HEADER_ID and BLANKET_PO_LINE_NUM column in po_requisition_lins_all table. Then I have ran Create Release Concurrent Program but that program Not picking the release from Requisition table.
Can any one face this issue...Please let me know what thing i missing while doing this.
Thanks.

According to what I understand from your question, you have the Req successfully created but the the release is not happening when you run the create releases program.
You have to have a ASL for this item with release property as Automatic Release and the BPO document number attached in the ASL attributes.
Let me know if you have this setup or not.
Karthik.

Pls Help!! element does not pick data after formatting

Hi,
this is my sample code...
<group name="G_ACQUISITION" dataType="varchar2" source="Q_ACQUISITION">
<element name="acq_date" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_DATE"/>
<element name="ACQ_TYPE" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_TYPE"/>
<element name="acq_num" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_NUM"/>
<element name="transaction_date_entered" dataType="date" value="TRANSACTION_DATE_ENTERED"/>
<element name="ASSET_ID_ACQ" dataType="number" value="ASSET_ID_ACQ"/>
<element name="BOOK_TYP_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="BOOK_TYP_ACQ"/>
<element name="trans_type_acq" dataType="varchar2" value="TRANS_TYPE_ACQ"/>
<element name="RETIREMENT_TYPE_CODE" dataType="varchar2" value="RETIREMENT_TYPE_CODE"/>
<element name="DATE_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="DATE_ACQ"/>
<element name="COST_VALUE" dataType="number" value="COST_VALUE"/>
<element name="CF_COST_VALUE" dataType="varchar2" value="COST_VALUE" function="CURRENCY_FORMAT" currencyCode="P_CURRENCY_CODE" width="19" />
<element name="CF_type_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="CF_type_ACQ"/>
</group>
</group>
<element name="CS_ASSET_COUNT" function="count" dataType="number" value="G_ASSET_MAIN.asset_id"/>
<group name="G_ACQUI" dataType="varchar2" source="Q_ACQUISITION">
<element name="acq_date" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_DATE"/>
<element name="ACQ_TYPE" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_TYPE"/>
<element name="acq_num" dataType="varchar2" value="ACQ_NUM"/>
<element name="transaction_date_entered" dataType="date" value="TRANSACTION_DATE_ENTERED"/>
<element name="ASSET_ID_ACQ" dataType="number" value="ASSET_ID_ACQ"/>
<element name="BOOK_TYP_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="BOOK_TYP_ACQ"/>
<element name="trans_type_acq" dataType="varchar2" value="TRANS_TYPE_ACQ"/>
<element name="RETIREMENT_TYPE_CODE" dataType="varchar2" value="RETIREMENT_TYPE_CODE"/>
<element name="DATE_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="DATE_ACQ"/>
<element name="COST_VALUE" dataType="number" value="COST_VALUE"/>
<element name="CF_type_ACQ" dataType="varchar2" value="CF_type_ACQ"/>
<element name="CF_COST_VALUE" dataType="varchar2" value="COST_VALUE" function="CURRENCY_FORMAT" currencyCode="P_CURRENCY_CODE" width="19" />
</group>
In the group G_ACQUI, element CF_COST_VALUE picks data from COST_VALUE correctly, but in the group G_ACQUISITION, the element CF_COST_VALUE carries 0.0
I tried changing the element name to CF_COST_VALUE1 in the group G_ACQUISITION and running, but the problem persisted.
Help!

got the solution.. i changed the element name cost_value in the group G_ACQUISITION to cost and ran the program. it picked data correctly

System not picking up the base lines created.

Hi,
We are in the process of upgrading database from 10.2.0.5 to 11.2.0.3.4 and as a part of this, i am working on implementing the Sql PLAN management to stability the environment. i tried following URL and it worked in one of the database as per the instructions but i used same instructions, but SQL is not picking up the base line. Can any body hint like any settings needs to be done at DB level.
ORACLE-BASE - SQL Plan Management in Oracle Database 11g Release 1
Regards
DBA.

What I can suggest you is to post the execution plan that is in the SPM baseline for your sql_id (or your force matching signature) using for example this
1) plan from baseline
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_sql_plan_baseline(plan_name => 'SQL_PLAN_13w748wknkcwd495f4ddb'));
You get your plan_name ('SQL_PLAN_13w748wknkcwd495f4ddb') using such a kind of select
select
to_char(signature) signature
, sql_handle
, plan_name
, enabled
, accepted
from dba_sql_plan_baselines
where signature = 1292784087274697613;
where the signature should corresponds to your baselined sql
2) used plan
Then execute your query and get its execution plan using
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor);
By comparing the plan in step 1 and the one in step 2 you will have a clue why your SPM plan has not been selected for use
Best regards
Mohamed Houri

Import Standard Purchase Order not picking data when submitted from backend

Hi,
As part of my code, I am inserting Purchase order information in the interface tables with process_code = 'PENDING'. Then using fnd_request , i am triggering the Standard Program for importing these Purchase Orders. The standard program is getting triggered and completing normally. But it is not picking any records. I am calling the program as follows:-
              -- Setting the org_id so that the import program will run for that particular org_id.
              fnd_request.set_org_id(r_org_id.org_id);
               -- Submit the Import Standard Purchase Orders by calling the standard program for respective org_id
              l_req_id := FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST(application => 'PO'
                            ,program      => 'POXPOPDOI'
                            ,description => 'Import Standard Purchase Orders'
                            ,start_time => SYSDATE
                            ,sub_request => FALSE
                            ,argument1 => NULL
                            ,argument2 => 'STANDARD'
                            ,argument3 => NULL
                            ,argument4    => 'N'
                            ,argument5    => NULL
                            ,argument6 => 'APPROVED'
                            ,argument7 => NULL
                            ,argument8 => NULL
                            ,argument9 => NULL
                            ,argument10 => NULL
              COMMIT;
When I am submitting this same program from front end, for the same set of records using the same set of parameters, the records are getting picked.
Any suggestions for this?

Hi
Do you have a copy of your insert statement?
regards

F.05-Curr Translation - System not picking correct accounts from FBKP (KDF)

Hi FI Gurus,
We are having INR as Company Code Currency & USD as Group Currency.
We have given a diff set of accounts in FBKP-KDF for valuation and translation.
When we run F.05 for translation with Currency Type 30, the system is correctly converting all INR line items into USD but while posting the accounting document the valuation accounts are getting picked up instead of translation.
In debug, we found out that the system requires Clearing Document to go for Translation accounts & if it gets the clearing document in line item then it is picking up the correct accounts.
But then how the translation works for P&L accounts or balance accounts?
What is the exact functionality of Translation? How postings can be generated to correct accounts?
Regards
AK

Make the following entries in F.05 and execute.
General Selections:
1. Enter comany code
2.Valuation Key Date
3.Valuation Method
4. Valuation in Curr Type: 30
Under Posting:
1. If you are running it in a test mode, then do not check the boxes Bal. sheet preparation valuation and Create Postings.
2. Enter document date, posting date and period
3. Check the box: Reverse Postings
Under Open Items
1. Check Valuate G/L Account Open Items
2. Specify your G/L Account Numbers
3. Check the radio button: Valuate GR/IR
4. Check the box: Valuate Vendor Open items
5. Check the box: Valuate Customer Open Items
Under G/L Balances
1. Check the box: Valuate G/L Account Balances
2. Specify your G/L Account Numbers
Under Other
In our system, we created a variant and entered it in the blank field next to List Variant.
Under FASB 52
1. Exch. rate type for translation: Enter your exchange rate type here.
2. Check the box: Use for translation
3. Translation of currency type: 10
Execute your report.
Point of Note: None of this would work if you have not configured your foreign currency valuation properly. To get FCV working can be very frustrating and you would need to take your time. We have been working on ours for almost 7months now so patience and more research would help.

Date filter not reading dates correctly

I've noticed that since Bridge CS5 came out, the filter on date is not working correctly. For example,I'm looking at a series of images that I captured today (Sept 7th), and the date shown in the metadata panel of Bridge ays "Today". Yet, the Filter pane shows only "yesterday", not "today" as an option. When I click on "yesterday", Bridge displays the files that I took today! (And for the record, I'm using Bridge on Sept 7th, at 6 PM Pacific time when I'm posting this.)

Sorry, hope you can read the details...
Thanks, screenshot is clear, I see it but can't believe my eyes I'm
afraid....
Tried to reproduce it on my system but can't achieve this, pictures shot at
same day as 'today' give today in the filter panel and yesterday also
correctly filtered.
You have of course already checked the date and time of your camera?
But that should reflect also the data in the EXIF shown under file
properties in the Metadata section.
Assuming you have already tried to reset the Bridge Preferences (holding
down option key while restarting Bridge) you could also repeat this after
having manual deleted the AdobeBridge4.plist file from the preference folder
in the User library.
If still no luck, a way to narrow the possibilities down is if you have CS4
still installed you could try it in Bridge CS4 with the same files.
If it shows correct in CS4 it might be related to your CS5 install or to
NEF from D200 and Bridge CS5.
If it shows also incorrect in CS4 it might be related with your User account
or OSX.

System Not Picking Permitted Payee address when the Main vendor has PO Box.

Hi,
When we are doing payments to Permitted Payee ( Vendor ) the system is printing the checks with PO Box ( Post Box no. ) number of the Main vendor .
But when we deleted the PO Box number field in Main vendor, then the system is printing the check with Permitted payee address.
When Main vendor number has PO Box field populated with a number, selected credit address ( Permitted Payee address ) will not print on check.
When there is a Permitted Payee the system has to consider that Permitted Payee address only. But system is not doing like that.
Please advice what is the problem.
( They are paying through APP run ).

Can you please tell me where it is.
Thanks for your prompt reply.

Query view is not displaying data correctly

Hi,
We have built a query and 4 query views on the query and it is published in the Portal.
In the query ,we have a restriction on cost elements.
And on the query view we dont have any restrictions on costelements.
But when we execute the query view,the query view is showing some restrictions on costelements.
We have created a new query view on the same query and when we execute the query view in portal, it is showing soem restricitions on query view on costelements.Because of this User is not able to see all the data.
Any one help us in understanding and fixing this problem.
Thanks in advance!!

Hi,
These are the my assumptions please can you check the same.
1) cost element is always compounding with the controlling area can you check either any restrictions are there on controlling area.
2) As you said in mother report( query) you are having the cost element restrictions , from that query only you are creating query view so automatically which ever the restrictions are there globally on that report it will be worked on view also.
so it is better to avoid that first and create teh view with out any restrictins then you can create one more view with the cost element restrictions
craet main query with out any restrictions then creae te view with restrictions, you are doing vice versa.
Thanks & Regarsd,
sathish

LabVIEW not reading data correctly

I'm new to LabVIEW (using it for a subject at university) but I've coded up a short program that counts rising and falling edges of a signal (to be used with input of a quadrature encoder).
I've tested it at low frequency using the Simulate Signal block and it works fine, but as soon as I pump it up to anything above 4 Hz, it starts playing up (counting a positive edge as a negative edge). At 10 Hz, it doesn't count any edges at all. Same thing with the encoder - when we turn it very slowly the counts register fine, but turn it at even a moderate speed and it'll start missing.
Not sure what the issue is. The code is pretty simple so I'm not sure how that'd cause the problem. Here's a copy of my counter block (the true/false input tells it whether to count up or down).
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
counter_block.vi ‏21 KB

I've editted the counter file to include time measurement and also included a test file from which I run the counter. It seems to struggle above 5 Hz. I've ran it in my actual file (which is similar to the test but also counts edges of a second signal) and get the same interval between codes, so the actual code doesn't seem to be the limiting factor here.
Attachments:
counter_block.vi ‏22 KB
test.vi ‏59 KB

Query not showing data correctly

Hi All
i have one query on FILG cube in which FIscal period and one amount field is in columns
when i see in display data i have seen that there is a data for the period 001/2009, 002/2009 and 006/2009
but when i run the query it only display the data for the period 001/2009, 002/2009 and 006/2009 data is displayed in the overall result columns
this is happening only for one company code
please reply if anyone has came across this issue
Thanks

HI,
when i run the query with selection on Fisper - 001/2009 to 006/2009 and comp code -2000
then it displays data for 001/2009, 002/2009
but the data of 006/2009 is displayed in overall result column
there should be one another column with 006/009
for example
Fiscal Year/Period 001/2009 002/2009 Overall Result
Amount Amount Amount
but when i see in listcube it shows the data for Fiscal period 001/2009, 002/2009 and 006/2009

System not picking data correctly in S_PL0_86000030

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for