System Overload & How to get the best G4 Performance

Okay all you Logic and OSX Gurus. I need your help. I've finally made the LOGIC leap from OS9 and have hit the SYSTEM OVERLOAD wall like many of you before me.
I've been pouring over this, and many other Forums and Blogs, for about two weeks now, and have tried many of the fixes / solutions to no avail. I estimate I'm now getting about 25% of my OS9 Logic performance from Logic in OSX.
One specific case in point is this. A four minute song sketch. No tempo changes. Four midi tracks, 6 Audio instruments and 2 EFX (1 Guitar Amp Pro, 1 Space Designer that's no even being used).
I have unsuccessfully tried to Bounce this to disc for two weeks now. The AUDIO and DISK I/O Meters barely register until the GUITAR AMP PRO track brings the AUDIO METER up to about 1/3rd usage. At various points in the Bounce the G4 will completely FREEZE, and I will have manually restart.
THINGS I HAVE TRIED, and continue to try are:
- Repairing Permissions
- Trashing Preferences
- Updating MOTU Drivers
- Changing Processor performance setting - which I cannot do BTW, because my system does not seem to support this option.
- Closing all Widgets
- Freeing up more Space on my Mac OSx startup disk (I now have 78.41 Gig available on a 114.49 Gig drive)
- Run Cocktail to clean up System logs and temporary files
- FREEZING TRACKS as a temporary 'fix'. This did nothing BTW but add more strain to the CPU and I still had about 1/3rd the usage with my GUITAR AMP Plugin (and it still crashed).
- Increased AUDIO BUFFER to 1024
So, (and I guess this is really two sides of the same question)...
1) How do I FIX this SYSTEM OVERLOAD problem, and
2) How do I "optimize" my Dual 1.25 G4 in order to get the best performance possible out of LOGIC PRO?
OTHER QUESTIONS I HAVE ARE:
- Does the G4 have the processing power needed to run LOGIC PRO?
- I'm confident adding RAM will "help" (can't hurt), but am I really dealing with a RAM Problem here or, again, can these processors really handle it?
BTW - I'm not looking for an excuse to go shopping for a Quad G5 (I mean who needs an excuse... . But, I'm really trying to determine if at the end of the day I will spend money on RAM, Hard Drives, whatever..., and then still be frustrated and end up shopping.
- Are SCSI drives a problem with Tiger / Logic? These Cheetah drives are fast (10,000 RPM), reliable, and have been great drives to record on. I'm trying to do this simple bounce to one of the Cheetahs and as I said it's just not happening.
- Does the startup volume size effect performance?
- Does the amount of free space on the start up drive effect performance?
- Firewire 400 vs 800? My sample library is on the Firewire drive, and I'm thinking this does not pull a lot on the CPU as these get loaded into memory before playing? Am I right about that? It is Firewire 400.
A long letter and a lot of questions. I thank you all in advance for any answers, guidance or direction you can give. Please also let me know if there is something I HAVEN'T asked, looked at or should be doing.
Best,
Kevin
Kevin Saunders Hayes
SYSTEM SPECS
Machine Name: Power Mac G4
Machine Model: PowerMac3,6
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (3.3)
Number Of CPUs: 2
CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
L3 Cache (per CPU): 2 MB
Memory: 1 GB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz
Boot ROM Version: 4.4.8f2
Logic 7.1.1 (885)
Pro Application Support 3.1
MOTU 896 - Latest drivers
2 - Seagate Cheetah 9 gig SCSI drives
1 - Oxford Firewire (Up to 400 Mb/sec) with EXS Library
G4 Duel 1.25   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

And after months of using Express, and a week of
using Logic, I hadn't had a system overload until
today. Now I'm having them all the time. It wasn't a
set up change, it wasn't running on the battery, it
wasn't running software monitoring, it's set up with
512 i/o buffer, medium processor buffer. And it
wasn't brought on by number of tracks - that's for
sure. After it started happenind and I took a break &
came back, I was sitting on my couch, Powerbook in
my lap, tapping a beat in with the onscreen
keyboard.... a SINGLE instrument, mind you. NO plugs,
no other tracks of ANY kind. And it happened.
There's a lot of great, relevant and very helpful info on this forum and it all helps and it all counts. But..... so many people are suffering this when moving up to Pro 7 from either Pro 6 or Express. One expects a change in system load when a major update comes along but more and more people are reporting that simply recording 1 or 2 tracks of audio, pure, no plug-ins or EQ is causing an overload whereas in the previous version(s) this was easily accomodated. This, you may have guessed, has happened to me as well. Are we to accept in 1 version increment (albeit a major one) there is such a massive increase in demand from hardware that you cannot record a pure no-plug-in stereo track? When going back to 6.4.3 it will happily record 8 at once, let you EQ and reverb and then do another 8 AND then another. With no troble at all.
It is pointing more and more towards fundamental flaws in the programming. Did L7 come out too soon? Are we just beta testing what is pro software? We are only on 7.1.1 and 6 went to 6.4.3 but at no stage was it this bad at the fundamentals of what the App is for. I love Logic, I really do, but I think, even with all the great help we are fighting what Apple should be addressing. Not that you can find/contact/talk to or get any sort of response from them.
I have tried but have gone back to 6.4.3 until 7.1.2 or even 7.2 appears, but I'm not paying for 7.2. My £200 upgrade from 6.4.3 is now sitting on a shelf desperately wanting to use it.

Similar Messages

  • How to get the best possible performance when accessing remote files

    Hello,
    I have recently set up a VPN to allow remote access to an MYOB data file hosted on my Mac Mini at home (MYOB is an accountancy software package for Mac and PC).
    My Mac Mini is connected to the internet over a standard ADSL home broadband line, with a terrible upload speed. I think my ISP (BT) quotes 512k upload and up to 8 Meg download. Needless to say, access to the data file is sluggish at best.
    Can anybody recommend a better way to host the data file?
    I am aware of lots of 'free file hosting' services, a quick Google search brings up loads, but I need to actually open and run the file from its remote location. I cannot download and then upload again because we have multiple user access, and need to ensure the file on the server is not being edited by two people at once.
    Thanks for your help...

    Thanks for both of your answers.
    *Amazon S3 Option*
    I preferred the Amazon S-3 option for ease of use and setup, but this does not appear to work. The software accesses the file very quickly indeed, which is great, but I think due to the connection protocol the network volume reports 'zero' disk space remaining.
    The MYOB application does not like this, so pops up an error message saying it needs at least '200kb of disk space to open'. This is because, upon opening, it writes a couple of 'lock' files to the disk where the data file is stored.
    My previous solution with the Mac Mini used VPN to connect, thus allowing SMB shares for windows users and AFP shares for Mac, and when mounted these network volumes would report the remaining disk space of the Mac Mini itself. MYOB liked this.
    Is there any way I can get the network share to report something other than zero disk space remaining?
    *Dedicated Server Option*
    Otherwise, the VPS option sounds very affordable. I am however unfamiliar with the world of dedicated servers and the Ubuntu OS, but surprised they are so affordable. I would rather go this route than change my home ISP.
    Firstly I have never used Linux or typed anything into the command line. So, will I be able to use VNC to access the VPS?
    Second, to access the data file, should I continue to use VPN? My current VPN server software supports Linux, so can I use this on Ubuntu?
    Thanks again..

  • How to get the best sound from iMac?

    Has anyone heard of "Pure Music"?  Supposedly it's able to make music sound better.  I downloaded it for a 15 day trial but haven't figured out how to get it to work with itunes radio.  I'm using Klipsch 2.1 speakers with a late '13 iMac 3.1 quad core i7 w/ Yosemite.  I'm not unhappy with the sound.  Just wondering if there are any ways to enhance or tweak to get the best sound out of my system.

    *just a little update, I fixed the problem.
    I was suppose to put the Nvidia driver controller for the select program tab as well 
    Everything is running much smoother now, and I also had to turn off eco mode lol.

  • How to get the best results using the refine edge tool?

    how to use the sliders in the refine edge tool? how do you get the best results using the fine edge tool?

    You should ask in the forum for the (un-named) program you are using
    The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
    The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
    If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

  • IDVD quality update... how to get the best looking photo images on your TV

    To get the best quality photo slideshow (that looks the best on my TV)
    1) create the slideshow with music in "Photo to Movie" program
    2) send it to IDVD from "Photo to Movie"
    3) create the menu in iDVD
    4) make a disc image from iDVD (file - save as disk image) save on the desktop
    5) burn DVD at x2 in disc utilities on a Verbatim DVD-R disc
    ???? Any other suggestions to get a better quality product !!
    * special thanks to SDMacuser for all your help and prior posts.
    Cheers
    iMAC 5,1,Intel Core 2 Duo,2.16GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  
    iMAC 5,1,Intel Core 2 Duo,2.16GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    in search of the best looking photoslide show DVD to view on a TV..... a couple more questions
    if I understand some of the recent posts to get a clear picture:
    Question #1
    I need to import all of the photos into photoshop CS (or a similar product) and resize them to 1280 x 960 (4:3)ratio then open iDVD and import them.
    If I am doing Ken Burn effects then resize them to 2560 x 1920 and use "Photo to Movie" to create the slideshow then import into iDVD (to get a cool menu)
    can you just bring the images in from iphoto (in the same format that they were imported from the camera)?
    I am using a Nikon D70 6.0 megapixel
    Question #2
    If I burn the disc in iDVD... it is not as good as using Disk utility or Toast because of the burn speed (2X) ... is this correct?

  • How to get the best colour representation on screen

    Hi there,
    I am trying to get my LCD to most accurately represent colours from my Pantone swatch book. I have a Huey Pro calibration tool to assist in the LCD calibration.
    So, I've calibrated the display as best as I could. It's not a top of the line LCD and the Huey isn't the top of the line colourimeter so I understand that I won't get things absolutely perfect.
    I'm starting with the basics: trying to match the C M Y & K from the swatch book. Figure that's a good place to begin. I'd like to see RGB and CMYK values look as accurate as possible on my display. If I can figure that out, then I guess it's time to understand how to match the Pantone values and the Lab settings and all that jazz.
    My PS Colour Settings are North America General Purpose 2
    RGB: sRGB IEC61966-2.1
    CMYK: US Web Coated (SWOP) v2
    Is there anything else I can be doing to get a better on-screen representation?
    Is this Holy Grail even attainable with my modest setup?
    I'd really value your advice and opinions!
    Thanks!

    Humm could be one of two things...
    If the Display Resolution is off, go to: Apple > System Preferences > Displays > select the Display tab and choose the highest Scaled Resolution in the list.
    If just the Desktop picture is to narrow, go to: Apple > System Preferences > Desktop & Screen Saver > select the Desktop tab and change the Fit to Screen setting to Fill Screen.
    Likewise, I might complain to Verizon because those folks had no business messing with those setting.

  • How to get the highest CPU performance in Maverick

    I am currently doing many analyses in parallel using 10.9.2 on a 2013 MPB and came accross a problem that costs me a lot of time. I started another discussion yesterday, there it was not sure whether it is a software problem or operating system problem. Here I present my experience that makes me sure that it is an operating system related problem. Let me note also that otherwise I am very happy about 10.9's performance.
    I noticed that Maverick is controlling the priority of the processes running my analyses, these processes being slowed down it costs me considerable amount of time. I would like to know how to boost the CPU performance of my computer and finish these analyses as soon as possible.
    In a normal situation these process takes up about 90-100% of the CPU load, fans are turning full speed and this is good. I noticed the problem, when I log in as another user without logging out from the account where the analyses are running, leaving the processes on the background, and then coming back to the analysis account, I notice that the processes are slowed down. If I had 5 analysis procecesses, only 1 of them is working full speed. And the remaining 4 never come back to full speed as they were before I logged out.
    Maverick has complex complex mechanisms wrt power management and efficiency, and I am doubting that it changes the priority of these processes considering a normal user profile. However my aim is to get most of my computer
    My question is how could I boost the performance of this computer without letting the operating system slowing down processes that are not supposed to be slowed down....

    I completely agree with your explanations. And previously I used different versions of Unix operating systems.
    Here on maverick, I tried "renice", using first 0 and then -20 as the priority number, but it had no impact!
    The exact command I used is the follwoing
    sudo renice -20 -p 8149
    where 8149 is the process id. This had absolutely no effect at all...
    I also tried to slow down the single analysis process which is somehow running at full speed, this didn't work neither.
    What is puzlling me right now, I cannot get back my analysis processes to a higher priority even after coming back to the account where these analyses are running... Basically there is nothing else running behind... The other account is loged out... Before I switched accounts these processes were running at full speed and the fans were noisy. Right now, it is all silent and of course the only alternative I have is to restart the analyses from scratch again, hoping that Mavericks will give them full power next time.
    here is the info:
    Hardware Information:
              MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013)
              MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro11,3
              1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 4 cores
              16 GB RAM
    Video Information:
              Intel Iris Pro - VRAM: 1024 MB
              NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M - VRAM: 2048 MB
    System Software:
              OS X 10.9.2 (13C64) - Uptime: 0 days 22:53:14
    Disk Information:
              APPLE SSD SM0512F disk0 : (500.28 GB)
                        EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
                        Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.42 GB (245.67 GB free)
                        Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    USB Information:
              Western Digital My Passport 0748 2 TB
                        feargen2 (disk3s1) /Volumes/feargen2: 2 TB (1.16 TB free)
              Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
              Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
              Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
                        Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
              Western Digital My Passport 0748 2 TB
                        EFI (disk1s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
                        disk1s2 (disk1s2) <not mounted>: 2 TB
                        Boot OS X (disk1s3) <not mounted>: 134.2 MB
    FireWire Information:
    Thunderbolt Information:
              Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
                        Apple Inc. Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
    Configuration files:
              /etc/hosts - Count: 61
    Kernel Extensions:
              com.nvidia.CUDA          (1.1.0)
    Startup Items:
              CUDA: Path: /System/Library/StartupItems/CUDA
    Launch Daemons:
              [System] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] org.macosforge.xquartz.privileged_startx.plist 3rd-Party support link
    Launch Agents:
              [System] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] com.google.keystone.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] com.nvidia.CUDASoftwareUpdate.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] jp.co.canon.CUPSPS2.BG.plist 3rd-Party support link
              [System] org.macosforge.xquartz.startx.plist 3rd-Party support link
    User Launch Agents:
              [not loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
    User Login Items:
              iTunesHelper
              Degrees
    Internet Plug-ins:
              FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 12.0.0.44 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
              QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
              Flash Player: Version: 12.0.0.44 - SDK 10.6 Outdated! Update
              Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
              o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.2.4.18058 3rd-Party support link
              SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.3.9 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
              googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.2.4.18058 3rd-Party support link
              Silverlight: Version: 5.1.20913.0 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
              JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Outdated! Update
    Safari Extensions:
              feedly: Version: 16.0.521
              autocomplete: Version: 1.0
              clea.nr Videos: Version: 5.0
              Zotero Connector: Version: 4.0.8
              AdBlock: Version: 2.6.18
              Alexa Site Info: Version: 1.0
    Audio Plug-ins:
              BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
              AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
              AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
              iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
              Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
              CUDA Preferences  3rd-Party support link
              Flash Player  3rd-Party support link
    Old Applications:
              None
    Time Machine:
              Skip System Files: NO
              Mobile backups: OFF
              Auto backup: NO - Auto backup turned off
              Volumes being backed up:
                        Macintosh HD: Disk size: 465.12 GB Disk used: 236.32 GB
                        feargen2: Disk size: 2  Disk used: 783.46 GB
              Destinations:
                        My Passport [Local] (Last used)
                        Total size: 2 
                        Total number of backups: 18
                        Oldest backup: 2014-01-07 08:48:12 +0000
                        Last backup: 2014-03-31 14:16:50 +0000
                        Size of backup disk: Too small
                                  Backup size 2  < (Disk used 1019.78 GB X 3)
              Time Machine details may not be accurate.
              All volumes being backed up may not be listed.
    Top Processes by CPU:
                   5%          WindowServer
                   2%          mds
                   2%          Terminal
                   1%          Activity Monitor
                   0%          EtreCheck
    Top Processes by Memory:
              705 MB          MATLAB_maci64
              541 MB          Safari
              475 MB          WindowServer
              262 MB          mds_stores
              197 MB          Finder
    Virtual Memory Information:
              123 MB          Free RAM
              7.12 GB          Active RAM
              7.00 GB          Inactive RAM
              1.48 GB          Wired RAM
              117.39 GB          Page-ins
              52 MB          Page-outs

  • Get the best graphical performance

    I've been developing an application where the graphical appearance is very important, so every panel has a 1280x1024 size with a 32-bit color depth picture control as large as the panel itself used as background; moreover there are a lot of other picture controls.
    In this situation, loading and displaying panels is very slow, so I need to know form some CVI developers how I can improve these operations:
    is the performance of LoadPanel() affected by the size of the whole uir file, or by the size of the panel to be loaded? Is it a good idea having more than a panel in a single uir, if the uir size is more or less 100MB? I think there should be no difference...
    while updating tables, the performance increases if they're set as invisible before updating, and set as visible at the end. When a panel has been loaded, but not displayed yet, is the graphical performance affected by hiding or showing controls? I don't think so, because I think that if a panel is not displayed, all its controls are invisible, but I'm not sure...
    Thanks
    Vix
    In claris non fit interpretatio
    Using LV 2013 SP1 on Win 7 64bit
    Using LV 8.2.1 on WinXP SP3
    Using CVI 2012 SP1 on Win 7 64bit, WinXP and WinXP Embedded
    Using CVI 6.0 on Win2k, WinXP and WinXP Embedded

    After having reduced the images as possible, there are 2 or 3 uir files with a size of 20MB. All the uir files are then embedded into the executable files (that is more than 100MB large).
    I've already considered other design schemes for loading images, but this one is the best for my application: the problem is that the graphical performance of CVI are quite bad (as already discussed in the past)
    I've been trying to get the highest performance from CVI, but the improvements are not so easy.
    I don't have any particular issue with tables: it was only an example where a quite simple workaround dramatically increases the graphical performance.
    You could update all the values, then refresh the display rather than refreshing the display after each data update
    How can I suspend the display refreshing in CVI? I know LabVIEW has a panel property, but I haven't found any CVI function to do the same. I call ProcessDrawEvents() to force the refresh, but how can I suspend it?
    Vix
    In claris non fit interpretatio
    Using LV 2013 SP1 on Win 7 64bit
    Using LV 8.2.1 on WinXP SP3
    Using CVI 2012 SP1 on Win 7 64bit, WinXP and WinXP Embedded
    Using CVI 6.0 on Win2k, WinXP and WinXP Embedded

  • How to get the best iPhoto/Aperture slide shows on Apple TV

    Hi. I'd like to do very simple slideshows on Apple TV 2nd generation for friends and family, but haven't been able to get it to work very well. My needs, I think, are simple:
    No gimimick transitions, e.g. no Ken Burns. I don't mind an ultra-brief fade in/out, but that's about it. I found Classic, and that seems to work. I'm only mentioning it as it might have a bearing on the next two.
    I'd like complete control over advancing slides using the Apple Remote, or the Remote app on the iPad. No auto-advancing. If we're all enjoying, talking about a memory, the last thing I want is that memory suddenly yanked away to the next slide. When I try to pause, it pauses the music instead of the slides.
    I'd like the photos to have 720p resolution, which is what the Apple TV 2nd generation is capable of. All the originals are higher resolution (typically 3000 vertical, varying widths depending no how I've cropped), but sometimes the Apple TV decides to make them much grainier than one would expect from 720p. Other times they look fine.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    No there is no way to Mirror full screen from an iOS device to the Apple TV. iOS devices are not 16:9 like your HDTV so the mirrored image appears as the size your iOS device would be if it were the size of your TV. Hope that makes sense.

  • How to get the best from a PC? Some guides...

    I have recently made available three different 'guides' (from my perspective of course) and I thought it might be worthwhile to have it all in one place:
    1. A PC buying guide for NLE.
    2. Storage rules for an editing rig. Some basics.
    3. Guide for installing and tuning a Vista 64 PC.
    I hope you can profit from these postings.

    Harm,
    Have not gone to 64-bit yet, so I only linked to that post. Have not read it, but will, prior to the next build
    As for the hardware, some of the comments are on more current CPU's, etc., than I have. From my reading, I do not disagree with any of it.
    For the I/O layout, the only thing that I saw (and think I commented on when that first was posted) was the FW-800/external. My comment was based on my personal experiences with my hardware and SD material only. I do not debate that eSATA is better, but I have a lot invested in FW-800 externals, so have not made that jump. Also, my workstation's slots are full, so no eSATA for that box. I do recall that Jim Simon tried FW-800 and had nothing but problems. Guess that I have been lucky. To date, they have worked well for shuffling some Projects between the laptop and the workstation. As an aside, if I can work by the pool for much of a Project vs being in a dark interior room - guess which I will choose. So long as I can struggle by with the 17" monitor, I'll go for the outside. Need the big screens, or more power, and I just cart the external upstairs. Still, I do not disagree with your comments.
    Though I have a pretty good I/O system, when I do a new build I will definitely have your article in hand. Things have changed, since my last new machine and there is no reason to not incorporate the latest/best into it. I also have a printout of your "middle-of-the-road" workstation, and will likely model off of that too. Yes, things will change between now and then, but you provided a good template for me to work from.
    In total, I really liked all three articles (see comment on the OS one above). You distilled many discussions into concise form. Now, you also furnish a single link to all. Beats doing a Search on the fora, trying to remember which thread Harm, Jeff, Jim, Bill, Eddie, et al replied to with hardware suggestions. You put it all together for all users.
    Thanks,
    Hunt

  • How to get the best from 8gb ram in macbook pro_bootcamp Win 7

    Hi guys,
      I know what you are going to say, (run 64 bit windows) but bare with me.  I have brand new 2011 unibody macbook pro 13" 2.8 ghtz dual core 8gb of ram.  When running bootcamp windows 7 it shows only 2.16 gb ram usable.  I thought that 32 bit windows can handle 4 gb ram so how can I get at least that much grunt out of the machine.
       Yes, yes thanks for telling me that I can use 64 bit windows 7, but see I have downloaded a lot of autodesk 32 bit software (at 3gb per program) so it will be a month or so before my broadband is up for that kind of downloads again. I was wondering if you have a solution to at least get closer to the 4gb that should be available.
    Cheers

    The only way to have Windows  use 8GB ram is to, as you said you don't want to hear, use 64 bit Windows. Do the math 2^32 vs 2^64. It does not matter that you don't want to hear it, it is what it is.
    BTW, 32 bit programs will run in 64 bit Windows.
    And the reason you Windows can't use all your 4GB ram is because some of that 4GB is being used by your graphics etc.

  • How to get the best from Lightroom with my Nikon D700

    I am having real trouble with the results from Lightroom from my Raw files.
    I love Lightroom but am going to have to use another program unless I can figure out what to do.
    Can anyone give me any advice?
    I have never had to use presets etc. so am in need of basic help please.

    Ed
    I assume you tried to:
    If you are on Mac OS X, drag the "Camera v2 beta" folder to:
    /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles
    Do you have admin rights on your mac?  Otherwise, I am not to up on macs, and hopefully someone with more expertise can help with the installation.
    Cheers
    Rory

  • How to get the best quailty for export to DVD

    I am using Final Cut Pro Studio. I'm editing SD 16:9 anamorphic. What suggestions does anyone have for exporting (settings, rendering, to what (idvd, dvd studio pro) to DVD to be played on a computer or TV?
    Thanks

    Duplicate the preset  - actually, the folder for the preset.  Each DVD preset folder contains an MPEG-2 video and a Dolby Digital audio preset.  By duplicating the folder, you will duplicate the presets inside that folder.  The duplicated preset will be placed in the CUSTOM Preset section (below the Apple section).  Open the duplicated preset and tweak settings for the Dolby Digital encoder as I described above.  Tweak the MPEG-2 encoder preset as needed for each individual project.
    You can save any modifications you made to the duplicate presets once you've finished tweaking them.  That will make it easy to use them again in the future.
    As for the Taiyo Yuden / JVC thing, I always used Taiyo Yuden in the past, but about two years ago or so, all of my normal suppliers only had them available in JVC packaging.  Same discs, different marketing name.  Beware though, Taiyo Yuden/JVC also markets a "value" line of blanks that (and I quote) "Haven't met quality checks."  So only purchase blanks from their "premium" line.
    -DH

  • HD to SD how to get the best results

    I have shot a 3 minute film in HD, edited in HD, then created a SD MPEG 2 in compressor and created a SD DVD in DVDSP. The quality was not very good. So I exported the film in FCP with print to video back to the camera then down converted back into FCP created my MPEG 2 in compressor and the quality was much better. My question is: Is there a quicker way? Its not so bad with a 3 minute film but when it comes to longer films is becomes a nightmare. any suggestions gratefully received.

    Patricia W wrote:
    anamorphic (doesn't that use letterboxing?)
    No, it's a way to create a true 16:9 aspect ratio in SD
    without squishing or letterboxing or cropping.
    I want a regular 4 by 3 aspect ratio.
    Just guessing here: you're using Export Using QuickTime Conversion,
    and in the Size section, you have the option of preserving the aspect ratio
    (of the image, not the SD frame) using either Letterbox or Crop.
    Make sure you have the Dimensions set to 4:3.

  • How do I get the best resolution images?

    Can anyone explain to me how to get the best resolution of images and text in DSP. Down sizing to 720x576 at 72ppi in photoshop makes for better quality when using layered menus but my standard menus are poor quality. Why does a smaller image look lower res than a big one? I'd have expected the opposite.

    stupid problem. I don't know why Adobe dosent fix it.

Maybe you are looking for