System performance ECC 6.0 - Oracle 10.2.0.4

Hi,
There are any person that know if a central installation production system work better in a x64 or SPARC Solaris 10 OS.
Example machines Sun M4000 and X4640.
Thank you.
Sisco

> In reality I don't need the 25000 SAPs that provide the x4540 but my partner urge me to begin to use x64 platform for the advantege that offers (price, workload, etc...).
We use Solaris x64 for (mainly) Java installations on certified HP hardware, it works great.
> Change the platform suposses to me double the SAN disk space and recreate all the filesystem for the change from Big Endian to Little Endian Link: [Note 552464|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap%28bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==%29/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1310720], heterogeneous system copy, etc...
True.
> If I don't change the platform only I need configure OS becouse all the database and binares reside in the SAN.
That's also true - but you'll get more power - and this is only a one-time thing to do.
> I need make sure that the change are worth the trouble.
You can get a test/evaluation system from Sun for some weeks with your desired configuration - and try it out.
> Note: Excuse me for my english, I believe that he's horrible.
It's good, don't worry!
Markus

Similar Messages

SAP ECC 6.0 System Performance

Gentlemen,
Please advise me with the following scenario, which is Iu2019m facing a problem with system performance,
My system configuration is:      SAP ECC 6.0
Database System:          Oracle 10.2.0.2.0.
Server Configuration:     Power 6
Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER6
Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 6
Processor Version: PV_6_Compat
Number Of Processors: 6
Processor Clock Speed: 3503 MHz
CPU Type: 64-bit
Kernel Type: 64-bit
LPAR Info: 2 PRODUCTION
Memory Size: 47104 MB
Good Memory Size: 47104 MB
Platform Firmware level: EL340_039
Firmware Version: IBM,EL340_039
The following Information was generated from TCode: sm51:
SAP Release Information
Application Server SAPPRD_PRD_00
SAP Kernel Information
SAP Kernel : 700_REL
Database Client Library : OCI_101
created in : AIX 2 5 005DD9CD4C00
Support Level : 0
Kernel Patch number : 202
Source ID : 0.202
DBSL Patch No. : 046
ICU Version : 3.0 Unicode Version 4.0.1
libsapu16 Version : 1.0025 Apr 8 2009 16:21:08
Supported Environment
SAP Database Version
700
Database
ORACLE 9.2.0..
ORACLE 10.1.0..
ORACLE 10.2.0..
Operating System
aix 1 5
aix 2 5
aix 3 5
aix 1 6
My active parameter in Tcode : RZ10 as follow:
Parameter Name     Parameter value
login/accept_sso2_ticket     1
login/create_sso2_ticket     2
rsau/enable     1
login/failed_user_auto_unlock     0
login/fails_to_user_lock     5
gw/max_sys     2000
gw/max_overflow_size     25000000
rdisp/max_comm_entries     2000
rdisp/tm_max_no     2000
gw/max_conn     2000
rdisp/max_arq     2000
ES/SHM_SEG_COUNT     8192
ES/SHM_USER_COUNT     8192
ES/SHM_SEG_SIZE     2048
ES/TABLE     SHM_SEGS
ztta/short_area     4000000
em/global_area_MB     256
zcsa/db_max_buftab     10000
sap/bufdir_entries     10000
enque/table_size     60000
rsdb/obj/large_object_size     35000
rsdb/obj/max_objects     45000
rsdb/obj/buffersize     150000
rdisp/gui_auto_logout     0
login/password_expiration_time     0
rdisp/max_wprun_time     25000
login/multi_login_users     CICUSER,TALSAYED,ASALAM
login/disable_multi_gui_login     1
SAPSYSTEMNAME     PRD
SAPSYSTEM     0
INSTANCE_NAME     DVEBMGS00
DIR_CT_RUN     $(DIR_EXE_ROOT)/run
DIR_EXECUTABLE     $(DIR_INSTANCE)/exe
PHYS_MEMSIZE     8000
exe/saposcol     $(DIR_CT_RUN)/saposcol
rdisp/wp_no_dia     70
rdisp/wp_no_btc     20
exe/icmbnd     $(DIR_CT_RUN)/icmbnd
icm/server_port_0     PROT=HTTP,PORT=80$$
ms/server_port_0     PROT=HTTP,PORT=81$$
rdisp/wp_no_enq     1
rdisp/wp_no_vb     2
rdisp/wp_no_vb2     2
rdisp/wp_no_spo     10
abap/buffersize     9900000
zcsa/table_buffer_area     108003328
rtbb/buffer_length     60000
rsdb/cua/buffersize     24000
zcsa/presentation_buffer_area     28166144
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no     2000
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no     1000
rsdb/ntab/entrycount     68500
rsdb/ntab/ftabsize     100000
rsdb/ntab/irbdsize     20000
rsdb/ntab/sntabsize     3995
DIR_ROLL     /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_PAGING     /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_DATA     /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_REORG     /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_TRANS     /usr/sap/trans
DIR_TEMP     /tmp
DIR_SORTTMP     /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
zcsa/system_language     E
zcsa/installed_languages     AE
abap/use_paging     0
ztta/roll_first     1024
rdisp/keepalive_timeout     8000
ztta/roll_area     9000960
rdisp/ROLL_SHM     16384
rdisp/ROLL_MAXFS     32768
rdisp/PG_SHM     16384
rdisp/PG_MAXFS     200064
abap/heap_area_dia     2012217344
abap/heap_area_nondia     2012217344
abap/heap_area_total     2012217344
abap/heaplimit     40894464
abap/swap_reserve     20971520
ztta/roll_extension     2101346304
em/initial_size_MB     4092
em/blocksize_KB     4096
em/stat_log_size_MB     20
em/stat_log_timeout     0
login/no_automatic_user_sapstar     0
login/system_client     100
icm/server_port_1     PROT=SMTP,PORT=8025,TIMEOUT=180
rdisp/start_icman     TRUE
icm/host_name_full     SAPPRD.tmg.dom
install/codepage/appl_server     4102
ipc/shm_psize_10     500000000
ipc/shm_psize_14     0
ipc/shm_psize_18     0
ipc/shm_psize_19     0
ipc/shm_psize_30     -10
ipc/shm_psize_40     500000000
ipc/shm_psize_41     0
ipc/shm_psize_51     -10
ipc/shm_psize_52     -10
ipc/shm_psize_54     -10
ipc/shm_psize_55     -10
ipc/shm_psize_57     -10
ipc/shm_psize_58     -10
I already generated EWA report and I got the following result:
1. Performance Overview PRD
The performance of your system was analyzed with respect to average response times and total workload. We have detected some problems that may impair system performance.
To ensure adequate performance in your core business transactions, you should take corrective action as soon as possible. For further information, please SAP Support.
Rating     Check
     Performance Evaluation
The following table shows the average response times for various task types:
Task type     Dialog Steps     Avg. Resp. Time in ms     Avg. CPU Time in ms     Avg. Wait Time in ms     Avg. Load Time in ms     Avg. DB Time in ms     Avg. GUI Time in ms
DIALOG     212990     1595.2     257.7     31.0     5.0     622.2     136.8
RFC     2904     11876.4     192.1     33.1     1.4     10574.2     0.0
UPDATE     86257     116.1     28.4     2.1     2.9     58.1     0.0
UPDATE2     1100     84.6     16.9     1.3     1.4     48.2     0.0
BATCH     11600     189360.5     46218.1     5.5     3.7     132313.5     0.0
SPOOL     9989     1686.8     37.1     55.6     0.3     49.2     0.0
1.1. Current Workload
The following table lists the number of current users (measured from our workload analysis) in your system.
Users     Low Activity     Medium Activity     High Activity     Total Users
Measured in System     162     119     6     287
1.2. Performance Evaluation
The measured times are compared against reference times to provide a rating.
- If the number of dialog steps in an hour is less than 1000 this hour is not considered.
- If the total number of transaction steps is less than 24000, the rating for the task is not performed and a blue line is entered in the table.
The table below shows that a performance problem is expected for the task that is rated YELLOW.
Task     Steps     Application Server Performance     Database Server Performance
Dia     212987
Upd     86257
HTTP     0
Rating     Task     Time     Steps     Avg. Response Time (ms)     Avg. CPU Time (ms)     Avg. Database Time (ms)
     Dia     08-09     3726     1343     137     889
     Dia     09-10     19990     1003     174     620
     Dia     10-11     20603     1747     112     630
     Dia     11-12     27934     2437     239     612
     Dia     12-13     18921     2737     235     858
     Dia     13-14     21579     2163     349     549
     Dia     16-17     22529     1134     230     703
     Dia     17-18     12189     1709     561     991
     Dia     19-20     5840     1550     414     967
     Dia     20-21     4951     1294     176     454
The ratings in the table above are determined by comparisons against the reference table below.
If the dialog response times are very poor, it will cause a RED rating for the entire check.
Task     Reference for Avg. Response Time (ms)     Reference for Avg. DB time (ms)
Dia     1200     600
Upd     2400     1200
HTTP     1200     600
1.3. Transaction Profile Check
The following tables show the response times and the number of dialog steps for the transactions that cause the highest workload in your system. NOTE: A business transaction normally consists of more than one dialog step. As a rough estimate, the actual number of business transactions that are executed in your system is approximately one third of the total dialog steps shown. (Transaction CPIC/RFC is not taken into account.)
1.3.1. Transactions by Total Workload
The following tables list the activities with the highest contribution to the total workload.
WORKLOAD BY TRANSACTION (DIALOG/UPDATE)
Transaction     Type     Dialog Steps     Total Resp. Time in %     Avg. Resp. Time in ms     Avg. CPU Time in ms     Avg. DB Time in ms     Avg. GUI Time in ms
Total          299247     100.0     1168.9     191.7     459.6     136.8
ZFIBB     DIA     8592     11.1     4522.4     2258.5     633.4     30.1
ZFIRP     DIA     6641     7.3     3858.0     1089.7     1162.6     50.0
RECN     DIA     11644     6.8     2047.9     129.1     1165.8     202.6
SESSION_MANAGER     DIA     8972     5.7     2226.9     80.2     244.2     458.2
ZFICCR     DIA     4834     5.2     3775.9     138.4     2535.9     195.6
ZRECPD     DIA     8895     4.6     1790.1     85.9     525.3     329.4
FBL3N     DIA     10414     4.1     1386.7     109.3     971.8     49.1
ZFIOBC2     DIA     852     3.4     13909.2     2675.7     9302.3     1028.7
ZREOR     DIA     2241     3.3     5216.1     2246.2     808.1     357.5
ZFIOB     DIA     1176     3.2     9503.7     51.3     8287.0     753.4
38.1% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
WORKLOAD BY TRANSACTION (BATCH/SPOOL)
Transaction     Type     Dialog Steps     Total Resp. Time in %     Avg. Resp. Time in ms     Avg. CPU Time in ms     Avg. DB Time in ms
Total          21492     100.0     102913.8     24939.7     71399.3
SBIE0001     BTC     36     98.7     60613763.4     14848709.4     42408448.0
ZFIPR     SPO     448     0.2     7939.6     169.9     387.1
(BATCH)     BTC     7368     0.2     478.4     7.5     22.2
ZFIADCA     SPO     486     0.1     5733.7     168.6     177.9
RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_DISPATCHING     BTC     96     0.1     23895.0     1964.7     21770.3
ZFIJV     SPO     309     0.1     6092.5     107.7     89.5
SAPRSLOG     BTC     4     0.1     318475.8     69165.0     257824.5
ZRE_GENERATE_COND_RO     BTC     5     0.1     250075.0     3336.0     237287.8
ZRE_AUTO_REJECT_OFFER     BTC     20     0.1     57062.0     339.0     54977.8
ZRE_TRANSFER_TOCONT_UPL     BTC     346     0.0     3161.3     941.6     2327.7
0.6% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
According to our analysis, the main system load is caused by background jobs.
The EarlyWatch Alert Service can only detect performance problems for dialog, update and RFC response times. This service does not evaluate performance problems for background jobs.
1.3.2. Transactions by DB Load
The following transaction profiles list the transactions that have the greatest share in the database load, sorted by percentage of total database access times.
DATABASE LOAD BY TRANSACTIONS (DIALOG/UPDATE)
Transaction     Type     Dialog Steps     Total DB Time in %     Avg. DB Time in ms
Total          299247     100.0     459.6
RECN     DIA     11644     9.9     1165.8
ZFICCR     DIA     4834     8.9     2535.9
FBL3N     DIA     10414     7.4     971.8
ZFIOB     DIA     1176     7.1     8287.0
ZRECCR     DIA     1504     7.0     6368.3
ZFIOBC2     DIA     852     5.8     9302.3
ZFIRP     DIA     6641     5.6     1162.6
ZFIBB     DIA     8592     4.0     633.4
ZFIREMTCH     DIA     73     3.5     66443.6
ZRECPD     DIA     8895     3.4     525.3
45.3% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
DATABASE LOAD BY TRANSACTIONS (BATCH/SPOOL)
Transaction     Type     Dialog Steps     Total DB Time in %     Avg. DB Time in ms
Total          21492     100.0     71399.3
SBIE0001     BTC     36     99.5     42408448.0
RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_DISPATCHING     BTC     96     0.1     21770.3
ZRE_GENERATE_COND_RO     BTC     5     0.1     237287.8
ZRE_AUTO_REJECT_OFFER     BTC     20     0.1     54977.8
SAPRSLOG     BTC     4     0.1     257824.5
ZRE_TRANSFER_TOCONT_UPL     BTC     346     0.1     2327.7
RSPO1043     BTC     4     0.0     143273.5
ZFIPR     SPO     448     0.0     387.1
(BATCH)     BTC     7368     0.0     22.2
ZFIADCA     SPO     486     0.0     177.9
0.3% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
Please advice.
Regards,
Ahmed

Gentlemen,
Please advise me with the following scenario, which is Iu2019m facing a problem with system performance,
My system configuration is:
SAP ECC 6.0 , Oracle 10.2.0.2.0 , Kernel Patch number : 202 , DBSL Patch No. : 046
Server Configuration:
Power 6 , Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER6 , Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 6 , Processor Version: PV_6_Compat , Number Of Processors: 6 , Processor Clock Speed: 3503 MHz , CPU Type: 64-bit , Kernel Type: 64-bit , LPAR Info: 2 PRODUCTION , Memory Size: 47104 MB , Good Memory Size: 47104 MB , Platform Firmware level: EL340_039 , Firmware Version: IBM,EL340_039
My active parameter in Tcode : RZ10 as follow:
Parameter Name     Parameter value
rsau/enable                     1
login/failed_user_auto_unlock     0
login/fails_to_user_lock     5
gw/max_sys                     2000
gw/max_overflow_size     25000000
rdisp/max_comm_entries     2000
rdisp/tm_max_no                     2000
gw/max_conn                     2000
rdisp/max_arq                        2000
ES/SHM_SEG_COUNT     8192
ES/SHM_USER_COUNT     8192
ES/SHM_SEG_SIZE                     2048
ES/TABLE     SHM_SEGS
ztta/short_area                     4000000
em/global_area_MB                     256
zcsa/db_max_buftab                     10000
sap/bufdir_entries                     10000
enque/table_size                     60000
rsdb/obj/large_object_size     35000
rsdb/obj/max_objects                     45000
rsdb/obj/buffersize                     150000
rdisp/max_wprun_time     25000
DIR_CT_RUN                     $(DIR_EXE_ROOT)/run
DIR_EXECUTABLE                  $(DIR_INSTANCE)/exe
PHYS_MEMSIZE                   8000
exe/saposco                        $(DIR_CT_RUN)/saposcol
rdisp/wp_no_dia                         70
rdisp/wp_no_btc                  20
exe/icmbnd                        $(DIR_CT_RUN)/icmbnd
rdisp/wp_no_enq                1
rdisp/wp_no_vb                      2
rdisp/wp_no_vb2              2
rdisp/wp_no_spo                10
abap/buffersize                      9900000
zcsa/table_buffer_area     108003328
rtbb/buffer_length                    60000
rsdb/cua/buffersize              24000
zcsa/presentation_buffer_area     28166144
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no                     2000
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no               1000
rsdb/ntab/entrycount               68500
rsdb/ntab/ftabsize              100000
rsdb/ntab/irbdsize             20000
rsdb/ntab/sntabsize              3995
abap/use_paging                    0
ztta/roll_first                      1024
rdisp/keepalive_timeout                   8000
ztta/roll_area                        9000960
rdisp/ROLL_SHM                   16384
rdisp/ROLL_MAXFS                 32768
rdisp/PG_SHM                16384
rdisp/PG_MAXFS                 200064
abap/heap_area_dia             2012217344
abap/heap_area_nondia     2012217344
abap/heap_area_total      2012217344
abap/heaplimit                40894464
abap/swap_reserve                  20971520
ztta/roll_extension                  2101346304
em/initial_size_MB              4092
em/blocksize_KB                  4096
em/stat_log_size_MB                     20
em/stat_log_timeout                       0
install/codepage/appl_server     4102
ipc/shm_psize_10               500000000
ipc/shm_psize_14              0
ipc/shm_psize_18             0
ipc/shm_psize_19             0
ipc/shm_psize_30             -10
ipc/shm_psize_40            500000000
ipc/shm_psize_41                 0
ipc/shm_psize_51               -10
ipc/shm_psize_52            -10
ipc/shm_psize_54             -10
ipc/shm_psize_55             -10
ipc/shm_psize_57             -10
ipc/shm_psize_58                   -10
I already generated EWA report and I got the following result:
Performance Evaluation
The following table shows the average response times for various task types:
Task type     Dialog      Avg. Resp.      Avg. CPU      Avg. Wait      Avg. Load      Avg. DB      Avg. GUI
DIALOG     212990     1595.2                      257.7     31.0     5.0     622.2     136.8
RFC     2904     11876.4                      192.1     33.1     1.4     10574.2     0.0
UPDATE     86257     116.1                       28.4     2.1     2.9     58.1     0.0
UPDATE2     1100     84.6                      16.9     1.3     1.4     48.2     0.0
BATCH     11600     189360.5                46218.1     5.5     3.7     132313.5     0.0
SPOOL     9989     1686.8              37.1     55.6     0.3     49.2     0.0
1.1. Current Workload
The following table lists the number of current users (measured from our workload analysis) in your system.
Low Activity     Medium Activity     High Activity     Total Users
162                  119                                    6     287
1.2. Performance Evaluation
Task     Time     Steps     Avg. Response      Avg. CPU      Avg. Database
Dia     08-09     3726     1343              137     889
Dia     09-10     19990     1003                174     620
Dia     10-11     20603     1747              112     630
Dia     11-12     27934     2437                    239     612
Dia     12-13     18921     2737              235     858
Dia     13-14     21579     2163                  349     549
Dia     16-17     22529     1134               230     703
Dia     17-18     12189     1709                   561     991
Dia     19-20     5840     1550              414     967
Dia     20-21     4951     1294              176     454
Task     Reference for Avg. Response Time (ms)     Reference for Avg. DB time (ms)
Dia     1200                                                     600
Upd     2400                                               1200
HTTP     1200                                                  600
Please advice.
Regards,
Ahmed

System Refresh for ECC & PI in Oracle MCOD database

Hi All,
We are running our ECC system on linux and oracle. Our ECC Development system and PI Develeopment system is running on one box and on the same database (MCOD). The same is with the ECC production and PI production running on the same system and same database (MCOD).
Now our requirement is to refresh the ECC development system from ECC PRD system. But we don't want to do any changes in PI system. One option is that we can export the DEV Pi schema by running SAPINST and than refresh the ECC DEV system with ECC PRD system.
After this we will install fresh PI where it will ask for DB export we will give the path of the PI export which we have taken. But i am not sure this is possible or not. Is this possible??
Or Is there any other easy possible ways to do it?
Thanks,
Bhanu
Edited by: Bhanu Pratap Singh on Jun 17, 2009 4:36 PM

> Now our requirement is to refresh the ECC development system from ECC PRD system. But we don't want to do any changes in PI system. One option is that we can export the DEV Pi schema by running SAPINST and than refresh the ECC DEV system with ECC PRD system.
>
> After this we will install fresh PI where it will ask for DB export we will give the path of the PI export which we have taken. But i am not sure this is possible or not. Is this possible??
This is one big drawback of MCOD, you will always copy all. What makes things even more difficult is the fact, that a PI is basically an MCOD itself - it's ABAP + Java - which must both be copied. So you would need
- export the full PI system (ABAP + Java) - which is a homogeneous system copy Part I
- copy the database
- fiddle on database level to delete both PI schemas (ABAP + Java)
- install a new PI as homogeneous system copy Part II
Technically it's feasible but I wonder, that if you already try to separate the instances, why not install a second ORACLE_HOME on the QA (and later also on PRD) so you can in the future copy the system independently from each other?
Markus

Can UCCHECK be performed on already UNICODE migrated system during ECC upgr

Hi there,
Can UCCHECK be performed on already UNICODE migrated system during ECC upgrade?
If NO, why? What is the technical reason?
Prakash

Hi,
first unicode means
Unicode is a 16-bit code to represent universal character set, which is used to facilitate a better exchange of data between different systems.
for uncheck
The transaction UCCHECK is used to find Unicode related issues. You can use transaction UCCHECK to examine a Unicode program set for syntax errors without having to set the program attribute "Unicode checks active" for every individual program. From the list of Unicode syntax errors, you can go directly to the affected programs and remove the errors. It is also possible to automatically create transport requests and set the Unicode program attribute for a program set.
why you are checking second time.
Regards,
Madhu

Refreshing R/3 4.7 system from ECC 6.0 system

HI Experts,
We recently upgraded the system from R/3 4.7 (BASIS release 620) to ECC 6.0 (BASIS release 701). For one of the test system, a cross version refresh was performed. (Sandbox system was in 4.7 and production system is ECC 6.0).
When the refresh was completed, we were not able to login in 000 client using any of the user ids including the standard ones. Seems like all the user ids were deleted in 000 client. Then we changed the sap* login parameter and restarted the system to reset the SAP* login. Later the user master was imported from production system to test system's 000 client.
Are there any special steps to be carried out to prevent the above said incident?
What are the special steps that needs to be taken care of in the scenario of 'cross version' refresh.
Please let me know your inputs on this.
Thank you.
Balaji Singh

Hi Mark,
Yes the SAP Kernel was replaced.
OS - HP UX B.11.31
DB - ORACLE 10.2.0.4
There were no issues during the start of DB, appl after refresh. We imported the User master in the productive client that was backed up before refresh and imported the same after refresh. coincidentall, after the import of user master in productive client, this particular issue occurred in client 000. could this be a reason for deletion of user master tables in 000 client?
Regards,
Balaji Singh

SRM 4.0 (oracle 9.2) and ECC 6.0 (oracle 10.2) compatiblity

Dear Experts, have a question reqarding compatibility of SRM 4.0 (SRM SERVER 500) on Oracle 9.2 with ECC 6.0 (Oracle 10.x).
Currently we are on SRM 4.0 (Oracle 9.2) and R/3 4.6c (oracle 9.2) and we wanted to know if SRM 4.0 will work with ECC 6.0 on Oracle 10.2. Ours is Classic Scenario and the PR/PO are all created on the backend R/3 system for the SRM shopping cart.
Also the same concern for BW 3.5 (Oracle 9.2) with ECC 6.0 (Oracle 10.2). Currently they both use Oracle 9.2. We will not be using the BI Component in ECC , but will continue to use the BW which is running on its own instance. Also I could not find any SAP document that clearly states that the Oracle versions could be different for different components. Please help clarify and direct me to the documentation link. Thanks
Regards
Gabriel Bertrand

If you refer to the SRM Master guide under service.sap.com, you will get the clear picture.
Regards, IA

Requirements for SAP Document management system in ECC 5.0

Hi All,
Can any one provide me the requirements for SAP Document management system in ECC 5.0.
SAP Component   ECC 5.0
OS    Solaris 5.9
DB    Oracle 9.2.0.7
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Surendra
<removed_by_moderator>
Edited by: Juan Reyes on Aug 6, 2009 12:49 PM

That info is available either at http://service.sap.com/pam or http://service.sap.com/quicksizer
Please do some research before posting
Read the "Rules of Engagement"
regards
Juan

SQL Query With Like Operator - Performance is very poor - Oracle Apps Table

Hi,
I'm querying one of the Oracle Applications Standard Table. The performance is very slow when like operator is used in the query condition. The query uses a indexed column in the where clause.
The query is..
select * from hz_parties
where upper(party_name) like '%TOY%'
In the above case, It is not using the index and doing full table scan. I have checked the explain plan and the cost is 4496.
select * from hz_parties
where upper(party_name) like 'TOY%'
If I remove the '%' at the begining of the string, the performance is good and it is using the index. In this case, the cost is 5.
Any ideas to improve the performance of the above query. I have to retrieve the records whose name contains the string. I have tried hints to force the use of index. But it is of no use.
Thanks,
Rama

If new indexes are disallowed, not a lot of good ones, no.
If you know what keyword(s) are going to be searched for, a materialized view might help, but I assume that you're searching based on user input. In that case, you'd have to essentially build your own Text index using materialized views, which will almost certainly be less efficient and require more maintenance than the built-in functionality.
There may not be much you could do to affect the query plan in a reasonable way. Depending on the size of the table, how much RAM you're willing to throw at the problem, how your system is administered, and what Oracle Apps requires/ prohibits in terms of database configuration, you might be able to force Oracle to cache this table so that your full table scans are at least more efficient.
Justin

Need information related to Hookup of Portal System to ECC system

Hi all,
I need to hook up my Portal-NPX system to ECC PRD system.
Could someone please let me know the procedure to follow in order to create the connectivity between them.
My Portal Version is 7.01/SP3
My Backend system is ECC6.0/EHP4/SP6
Database is Oracle.
Solaris OS.
Thanks,
Sandeep

Hi Sandeep,
Please follow below links:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e09b3304-07d8-2b10-dbbf-81335825454f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/EP/8EstablishSingleSignOnbetweenPortal%28frontend%29andESS6.0%28backend%29
http://www.sap-press.de/download/dateien/1618/sappress_content_integration_sap_netweaver_portal.pdf (Go to Page 347)
Thanks.
Sushil

ABAP access key & install step for IDES ECC 5.0 oracle database

Hallo
if you have installation guide/steps for IDES ECC 5.0 (Oracle database) then please send me. also if you have ABAP access key for the IDES ECC 5.0 (SQL 2005 database) . My system details as
SID=ERP
instance no=00
host=sapsrv
database=SQL 2005
Waiting for faveroable reply

I really appreciate response for my question.
I am trying to install a non-IDES version of ECC 5.0 (central, database, and dialog instances).
Questoin : Do I need install Solution Manager 3.2 on the same server where I am installing ECC 5.0?

Heterogeneous system copy from MSSQL to Oracle

Dear Experts,
I have performed ABAP+JAVA system copy R3load based from Oracle to Oracle and MSSQL to MSSQL platform.
Homogeneous system copy many times.
But this is first time i am perfoming an Export from MSSQL source system with r3load Export method .....My Target system is havign Oracle 10.2.0.2 software installed along with installation prerequisites.
But while Importing the same MSSQL Export ...I am not getting any option for heterogeneous system copy.
I am running on ECC6.0 windows platform and i also have generated Migartion KEY.
But where should i put this key.
I have gone through system copy guide many times but unable to understand Exact options to follow to Migrate to Oracle target system. Appreciate if anyone can give me detail steps i need to carry on Target system
Best Regards,
AjitR

Markus,
Thanks for the help, i have done Export with mentioned way and this time DBSIZE.xml file got created under ORA directory ....i started installation at target system....It went smooth until phase Import java Dump Done. .....But during Post load activities It gave error...
When i tried connectivity to Oracle database it works fine and
R3trans -d gives below mentioned error....Looks like table does not exist....all ENV variables are also got set at target machine.....
Error as below
Now 'SAPSR3/<pwd>@TST' is connected (con_hdl 0, nls_hdl 0).
4 ETW000                                                                             389 0.171885
4 ETW000 [dev trc     ,00000] Database NLS settings: AMERICAN_AMERICA.UTF8       23682 0.195567
4 ETW000 [dev trc     ,00000] Database instance TST is running on CSSLDELL-3 with ORACLE version 10.2.0.2.0 since 20080522
4 ETW000                                                                            4056 0.199623
4 ETW000 [dev trc     ,00000] Connection 0 opened (DBSL handle 0)                14523 0.214146
4 ETW000 [dblink      ,01299] ***LOG BZA=>table SVERS      does not exist on database            [dblink#3 @ 1299]
4 ETW000                                                                            8145 0.222291
4 ETW000 [dev trc     ,00000] NTAB: SELECT COMPCNT FROM DDNTT FAILED              1021 0.223312
4 ETW000 [dev trc     ,00000] NTAB: SELECT VERSION FROM DDNTT FAILED               520 0.223832
4 ETW000 [dbntab.c    ,00000] *** ERROR => NTAB: SELECT VERSION/DBASE FROM DDNTT FAILED
4 ETW000                                                                             505 0.224337
4 ETW000 [dbntab      ,01273] ***LOG BZY=>unexpected return code 103        calling NTAB       [dbntab#3 @ 12737]
Please help...Points rewarded anyways.....

After compressed the database table affect the system performance

There is a very big database table in my system called MSEG. It is about 910G and the wasted tablespace is about 330G. I want to compress the table, but the table is written and deleted frequently. will it affect the system performance if I compress the table. Or I can only select reorganize the dababase table avoid it affect the system performance? Thanks.

Hi Huiyong,
If you talk about table compression, it cannot be done online. we need to do this with a planned downtime. Table compression has some percentage of overhead on CPU. Refer SAP note for
1289494
FAQ: Oracle compression
1436352
Oracle Database 11g Advanced Compression for SAP Systems
If you talk about online table reorg, yes definitely there would be impact on user performance.
As the table size is very big it may take some days or hours to perform online Reorg.
Other faster method is to perform table export import which is faster than online reorg. But it will again require downtime .
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

System performance VS Real-time Data Acquistition

How the ECC & BI system will be affected by Real-time Data Acquistition?
If it affects performance, Is there any way to maintain the same system performance as without RDA?
Need inputs on BI side, Basis and R3 side......

Hi,
Check the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/52/777e403566c65de10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Good Blog.
/people/kamaljeet.kharbanda/blog/2006/11/13/real-time-data-acquisition-bi2004s
/message/1921395#1921395 [original link is broken]
Regards,
Malar

Stock value is not getting updated in APO system From ECC automatically

Hi All,
Stock value is not getting updated in APO system From ECC automatically but if we do it manually from transaction CFM2 it will get updated.
for this we are using EXIT_SAPLCSTK_001.
I am using VL10A for delivery and VL06G for PGI
I have also checked integration model for material and stock.
Please help me out as it is very urgent.
Thanks,
Gaurav Mittal
Edited by: GAURAV MITTAL on Feb 6, 2008 6:09 PM

Hi,
for transferring the stock data from R/3 to APO automatically, you need to have the integration model for material and stock activated.
please check the same.
if this does not help, let me know in detail the steps which you are following..
Ram

How do I block an ad that opens up a new Firefox window and keeps telling me my system performance is poor? I can't even capture the link.

This particular ad, supposedly from a Windows Certified Partner, opens in a second Firefox window and keeps flashing the message that my System Performance is Poor, wanting me to click on their ad and let them do whatever nasty things they want to my system. I have not been able to capture the path but next time it comes up, I will write down all that I can see.
If I have closed my main Firefox screen first, and then close out this ad, the next time I open Firefox, the ad opens and all my standard tabs are gone, requiring me to reopen each one seperately (Facebook, Google, etc).

Just to address the last point: check your History menu to see whether you have the Restore Previous Session option and use that if you can. If that is grayed out or doesn't restore everything, check the Recently Closed Windows and Recently Closed Tabs lists for other pages.
The unwanted window may be generated by an add-on. Try disabling ALL nonessential or unrecognized extensions on the Add-ons page. Either:
* Ctrl+Shift+a
* "3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons
In the left column, click Extensions. Then, if in doubt, disable.
Usually a link will appear above at least one disabled extension to restart Firefox. You can complete your work on the tab and click one of the links as the last step.
Any improvement?
Here are some other things to check:
(1) user.js file that changes Firefox startup behavior and overrides your preferences. This article describes how to track that down and delete it if you have one: [[How to fix preferences that won't save]].
(2) Possible hijacked shortcut. Check the "target" of the desktop icon you use to start Firefox to see whether it lists the unwanted page. To do that:
right-click the icon > Properties > Shortcut tab
For 64-bit Windows 7, the Target should be no more and no less than this:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe"
(3) Possible undisclosed bundle items. If you have installed any free software recently, check your Windows Control Panel, Uninstall a program for surprises. If you click the "Installed on" column head to group by date, it is easier to spot bundled junk. Remove everything suspicious or unrecognized.
(4) Supplemental clean up scans. Our support article lists tools other Firefox users have found helpful: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
Hopefully that cures it.

System performance ECC 6.0 - Oracle 10.2.0.4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for