System Properties user.timzone different between dev. and prod. system

Hi all,
I am facing the following issue:
In our development system I get in http://<server:port>/sap/monitoring/SystemProperties -> dispatcher -> system properties a Europe/Berlin for user.timezone.
In our productive system I get in http://<server:port>/sap/monitoring/SystemProperties -> dispatcher -> system properties a GMT for user.timezone.
Can anybody explain which system property is requested by the J2EE-engine when calling this property?
I ask, because I wrote a small programm requesting the user.property via java (expecting j2ee-engine would do that too) an got back an empty string (on both systems).
So, how/where can I change the parameter, so that the development system uses GMT, too?
I already checked the spro settings in sap, they are identical. System -> status showes the same for both systems, too.
I hope for your help.
Thanks and regards
Christian

Hello Chris,
I checked the system variables with TA SM51 ->goto -> server -> information -> environment.
There is nothing like the TZ variable on both systems (we use Linux).
Do you have an other idea?
How can I change the user.timezone shown in Java system properties?
Regards
Christian

Similar Messages

Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

Hi All,
I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
Kind Regards,
Surya Tamada.

Hi Surya ,
First build whole data flow :
1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures
2 DSOs ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it as per your requirement .
then built flat file data sources and transformation .
get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
Regards,
Jaya

FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

Hi,
I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
Thank you very much.

Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
Thanks.

Performance problems between dev and prod

I run the same query with identical data and indexes, but one system takes a 0.01 seconds to run while the production system takes 1.0 seconds to run. TKprof for dev is:
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDVALUE
3 NESTED LOOPS
1 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_PACKAGE
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032600 (object id 51356)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDELEMENT
41 AND-EQUAL
82 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE2 (object id 53559)
41 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE1 (object id 53558)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BAND
41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0034599 (object id 53556)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032549 (object id 51335)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BV1 (object id 53557)Tkprof for Prod is :
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDVALUE' (TABLE)
52001 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_PACKAGE' (TABLE)
1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018725' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDELEMENT' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BE2' (INDEX)
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BAND' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0030648' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018674' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BV1' (INDEX).The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.
Any ideas?

From DEV you show the Row Source Operations for the query. The column named "Rows" signifies the actual number of rows processed with each step.
From PROD you show the Execution Plan for the query; that is, tkprof was executed with the EXPLAIN option which generates the execution plan as of the time when tkprof was run. The "Rows" column in the Explain Plan output comes from the PLAN_TABLE.CARDINALITY, which represents an estimate by the CBO for the number of rows [expected to be] processed with each step.
So, if by <quote>The row count varies greatly</quote> you meant these "Rows" columns outputs then you're are comparing actuals from a database with estimates from another. Get the Row Source Operations from both.
"Identical data and indexes":
1. data may be the same, but it is not necessarily stored physically the same way.
2. Indexes being the same means their definitions are the same; again, physically they are not necessarily identical
In other words, data in PROD (the way it is stored on disk) may have evolved as a result of discrete deletes/updates/inserts ... in DEV it could be, for example, stored more compact if you took a copy of PROD and moved into DEV. So, the number of blocks for your segments will likely be different between PROD and DEV, the clustering factor for your indexes are likely different, etc ... things which could [and do] influence the CBO. The statistics may be different.
I guess what I'm saying is ... it is quite hard, if not outright impossible, to get two identical databases/instances/load ... hence, don't expect the executions to be 100% identical, even if you have "identical data and indexes". By all means compare between DEV and PROD (make sure you compare the same thing though) and use the observed differences as an indicator for further investigation ... don't chase the goal of 100% identical behavior.
Now, by all means look at that query taking 1 second in PROD ... I have only addressed <quote>The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.</quote>

Xml schema different between Dev and QA

The XML schemas are different between our DEV and QA systems after applying XI stack 13/SRM stack 10. It may be that they were different before applying the stacks but it has only been spotted in testing. We need to find out why before we live with the SP stack into production.
We have re-applied the XI content tpz files to both the DEV and QA servers and can't see any differences between in the design time repository apart from between the generated XML schemas:
A simple example of the difference is included below. The difference
only seem to be in the SRM Server 5.5 content and seems to be to do with the hierarchies in the header declaration with xmlns:p0="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global" being in a different position in Dev than in QA. I have raised an OSS message but have been waiting for 2 1/2 days now for a response and we are due to go live with the patching in a weeks time. Any help steering me in the right direction would be most appreciated.
Dev:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:p0="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global"
xmlns="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal/Global"
targetNamespace="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal/Global">
<xsd:import namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global" />
<xsd:element name="PurchaseOrderRequest"
type="p0:PurchaseOrderMessage" />
</xsd:schema>
QA:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal/Global"
targetNamespace="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal/Global">
<xsd:import namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global" />
<xsd:element xmlns:p0="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global"
name="PurchaseOrderRequest" type="p0:PurchaseOrderMessage" />
</xsd:schema>
Many thanks
Ian

Like I have mentioned in my reply yesterday to your another post, I am very positive that the role you are looking at in your QA system is the role "Accessible Content Administration".
Please verify your role assignment and make sure that you have the correct roles assigned.
Thanks,
Shanti

DataSource / Structures mismatched between Dev and Test Systems. ..!!

Hi,
We are doing a scenario. Where XI will update the data into PSA through ABAP proxy.
Scenario worked perfectly in development system.
We transported the objects from Dev to test. The Strucures are mismatched in SE11 between development and Test systems as below.
Data sources (ZDS_RECIHDR and ZDS_RECTPALL) looks ok. But when I saw the structures in SE11 they are not correct, they got mismatched.
Development:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
Test:
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
/BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
Kindly let me know where it might have gone wrong?
Thanks
Deepthi

We done it already. Still it is failing.
While transporting, it is failing and showing the error as
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZSALENUM', but there is a component called
Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZTRANDATE', but there are the following com
The Structure is mismatched in SE11 between header and allocation structures. That is the reason it is failing.
Any more ideas pls?

Source System Mapping between BW Dev and Prod system

Hi,
I have a DB Connect Source System in BW Dev system called DBSRCDEV which points to one of our Oracle Dev DB.
In Production, the DB Connect Source System is called DBSRCPROD and it points to the corresponding Oracle Prod DB.
In Development, I created a data source on this Source System (DBSRCDEV) and I tried to transport it to Production. But it failed with error saying that DBSRCDEV does not exist.
Where and how can I maintain or configure the mapping between DBSRCDEV and DBSRCPROD Source System so that I can transport my data source to Production?
Please help.
Thanks,
CH

Hi,
usually you need to maintain the setting for the change of the logical system name (source system) in each target system of a transport. So in your prod system goto rsa1->tools->change logical system names...
After maintaining that table, try to import your request again.
regards
Siggi

Query Execution time is different in DEV and PROD

Hi,
Query is as follows:
SELECT DISTINCT tds.*
FROM testdev.contract_trans npq, testdev.contract_trans_group tds
WHERE npq.contract_trans_group_id = tds.id
AND tds.contract_id <> :contractid
AND tds.tradingday_date BETWEEN :fromtradingday AND :totradingday
AND tds.category_id = :categoryid
AND tds.state_id = :entitystateid
AND EXISTS
(SELECT *
FROM testdev.contract_trans npq1,
testdev.contract_trans_group tds1
WHERE npq1.contract_trans_group_id = tds1.id
AND tds1.contract_id = :contractid
AND (npq.network_point_id = npq1.network_point_id
OR (npq.network_point_id IS NULL
AND npq1.network_point_id IS NULL))
AND tds.tradingday_date = tds1.tradingday_date
AND tds.category_id = tds1.category_id
AND tds.state_id = tds1.state_id)
This query is taking 500ms of time to execute in DEV and when it is executing in Prod it is execuiting in 1.10min. I also analyze the table as well as use hint on this. But the time is not getting reduce in Prod. I compare the tables of dev and prod but data is on shink.
row execution plan for DEV :
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 1.62 1.57 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.81 0.78 0 1208 0 364
total 4 2.43 2.37 0 1208 0 364
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 5 (SYSTEM)
Rows Row Source Operation
364 HASH UNIQUE (cr=1208 pr=0 pw=0 time=783194 us)
545 FILTER (cr=1208 pr=0 pw=0 time=775342 us)
545 HASH JOIN (cr=1208 pr=0 pw=0 time=774670 us)
99432 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS (cr=382 pr=0 pw=0 time=465 us)
18225 HASH JOIN (cr=826 pr=0 pw=0 time=359469 us)
1000 HASH JOIN (cr=445 pr=0 pw=0 time=108528 us)
46 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS_GROUP (cr=223 pr=0 pw=0 time=48274 us)
675 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS_GROUP (cr=222 pr=0 pw=0 time=51497 us)
99432 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS (cr=381 pr=0 pw=0 time=182 us)
And row execution plan for PROD:
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 80.03 78.40 219 319722 0 364
total 4 80.03 78.41 219 319722 0 364
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 5 (SYSTEM)
Rows Row Source Operation
364 HASH UNIQUE (cr=319722 pr=219 pw=0 time=78406184 us)
545 FILTER (cr=319722 pr=219 pw=0 time=78385884 us)
545 HASH JOIN (cr=319722 pr=219 pw=0 time=78384017 us)
675 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS_GROUP (cr=222 pr=219 pw=0 time=328724 us)
2380118 NESTED LOOPS (cr=319500 pr=0 pw=0 time=71521450 us)
837 HASH JOIN (cr=603 pr=0 pw=0 time=315980 us)
46 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS_GROUP (cr=222 pr=0 pw=0 time=48647 us)
99432 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS (cr=381 pr=0 pw=0 time=100990 us)
2380118 TABLE ACCESS FULL CONTRACT_TRANS (cr=318897 pr=0 pw=0 time=70077111 us)
Can any body help me out why this is happening?
Regards,
Saptadip

Welcome to the forum.
Please edit your post and use the {noformat}{noformat} tag, so your examples will stay formatted and indented.
Put the tag before and after all text you want to stay formatted.
{noformat}..{noformat} - Displays everything between the tags as programming code.
The query on PROD is doing lots more of reads/processing much more rows then on DEV.
For example, take table CONTACT_TRANS:
- less than 100,000 rows on DEV
vs
more than 2,300,000 on PROD.
but data is on shink.What does that mean?

Field Status review between Dev and Prod.

Hello All,
During solving one of the ticket, I found that there are some difference in selection of some of fields as suppress,optional and compulsory for account groups with screen layout (customers) - (T. Code - OBD2) between Development and Production server. Now I would like to test for all account groups between Prod and Development.It is taking lot of time to see screen by screen.
Can any body throw some light on this regarding any alternative way or can we download table information ?
Thanks in advnace for your cooperation.
Regards,
santosh

Try this:
transaction: SE16
Table: T077D
Execute
Do same in both systems and compare.
Once you identified differences go back into the transaction as mentioned - OBD2- for detail analysis.
GL
Hein
Please assign points if helpful.

Risk Analysis result different in DEV and PROD

Hi Gurus,
I have modified few functions in development and transported the changes but after transport there is a new SOD produced at the user level and with same access in Development there is no violation when I checked the function permission there is two duplicate entries in production ruleset compared to Development. Do I need to remove the duplicate entries in production and then run risk analysis is this going to fix SOD ?
My assumption is GRC 10 doesn't have ability to transport changes for deletion in functions.
Regards,
Salman

Dear Salman,
looks that the rules have been appended so it shows twice.
I suggest to download the correct rules from DEV and upload in PROD again. You can use program GRAC_UPLOAD_RULES to upload in PROD. Please make sure you set the option to overwrite, and not append.
With GRAC_RULE_DELETE you can also delete the rules before you upload (not necessary, but possible).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alessandro

Organization unit ID is different in Dev and Quality Systems

Hi Experts,
We have downloaded the Organizational Structure from ECC in the Dev System, Sales organizations, Sales offices and sales groups were created with number range Assigned to Current Active Plan version. but the number for the Sales orgs started with 50000026 instead of starting with 50000001. And in the Quality again we have downloaded the Org. structure from ECC, now the IDs were created starting from 50000007. this causing the inconsistencies in the Qualtiy System like, Pricing procedures are not getting determined.
why the Ids were created from 50000026 instead of 50000001.
What are best practices to have the same ID for Organizational Units in both the Systems?
Thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Hi Kiran,
thanks for responses,
Now we are planning to delete the Org. Structure in Quality and planning transport if from Development. What is best approach to save the Org. model in Transport request and move to Quality. I came to know about the report RHMOVE30, will it be used for transporting from Dev to Quality?
One more thing, if we transfer the Org data to Quality will it take the same no. in Quality. I have doubt, If Dev Org Id were created from 50000026 and Quality it will start from 50000000.
Kindly help me,
thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

OSS Patch Comparison between DEV and PRD systems

Hi All,
Can you provide me the steps how to compare SNOTE applied in BI Development and BI Production.
Thanks & Regards,
Jelina

check this
OSS Note Patch Implemented?
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/472443f2-0c01-0010-20ab-fbd380d45881?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true

SYSTEM LANDSCAPE - DEV and PROD - refresh

Hi All,
We have a situation like this.
1. Our BW Q&A is a copy of PROD
2. Our BW DEV is not either a copy of Q&A or PROD.
3. We have issue with a particular process chain in PROD and we need to correct (and follow the lanscape..that is want to do the correction in DEV and the transport to QA and then to PROD)
4. Since this particular process chain is not existing in the DEV environment, our Basis team is advising us to check the difference in DEV and PROD for as this process chain concern and then want to refresh it to DEV system so that we can carry out the change/modification.
We don't know really what exactly we need to find the differences between DEV and PROD for this PC and then to inform to Basis team...
Is it correct that since the particular process chain associated with various queries,data targets,update/transfer structures...etc will be over writen / copied / refreshed in DEV system from PROD?
Please advise..Please help..

Hi George, SAT, BWer,
Thanks for your messages.
George : Answers to your question:
1. Our Basis team want to copy all the configuration (related to the particular process chain only)and not Data's.
2. How to pack the process chain in a portable file and extract this file. then import it into DEV..and what is the way not to get error when doing so (knowing that fact that obejects will be different..) I don't know..whether to copy the objects are or not..
3.I agree with you.. Even we are ready to work with DEV to PROD..
SAT: Answers to your questions:
1. I do see some Process chains in the DEV and not related to this particular PC. Many development PC are there..and I don't know where the originally developed PC's ???!!
2. I am new to this Client..sorry..how this has been deleted...
BWer :Answers to your questions:
1. Yes..PC is Latest in the PROD.
2. We don't want to create the process chain all the way from scratch in the DEV. Yes..This is one of the process chain used in the metachain...Totally there are five chains in the PROD related to this..We need to modify only the second process chain..which we are trying to copy in the DEV and then do the changes...
Hope , you are clear about our requirement.
Please advise me what exactly we need to look into the DEV and PROD system so that required PC is copied alomg with (????) to DEV system..Please help.
Thank you very much in Advance..

What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?

Dear
What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?
Thanx & Regards
Mohamamd Nabi
[email protected]

hello, friend.
actually, you can search for subjects like this in the threads archive. you will be pleasantly surprised to find that there are already many threads with similar issues and that you can find answers to even more otherwise unrealized questions. and you don't have to wait for anyone to reply.
it looks like the issue is urgent for you, and this is why i am attaching this feed from Sadhu Kishore, which was posted some time ago... (if he replies to your thread, you may choose to award him points).
"Hi,
The transport workflow provides a framework for transporting enhancements or new developments of existing business functions in a system landscape. It provides a direct connection between development and transport administration. The transport workflow manages the transport process, determines the user for each individual step automatically, and then displays an interface which they can use to perform the task directly.
It is an efficient method of transporting a selected number of requests into a group of transport targets, and uses clearly defined approval steps to ensure the quality of your target systems. The requests can be transportable change requests, Customizing requests, relocation transports or transports of copies. The transport targets do not need to be located on defined transport routes. However, the transport workflow can involve some risks, caused by the dependencies between transport requests:
Import sequence
It is important that you import requests in the correct order, so that development work is up-to-date in the target system.
Incompleteness
It is important that the functions transported in the transport proposal are complete; otherwise errors may occur in the import system.
A request is not imported, but it contains an important data element. You use another request to transport a table that references this data element. Since the referenced data element does not exist in the target system, activation errors will occur when you import the second request.
The transport workflow is a generic workflow. Its ability to process the transport route configuration in TMS enables it to adapt itself to any system landscape. This means you can transport multiple requests into multiple targets, even if these targets are not located on the transport routes.
This reduces the amount of work for the transport administrator significantly. The automated nature of the workflow also reduces the likelihood of errors during transports.
You can use the transport workflow in two different ways.
Transport workflow as a transport strategy
If you have production systems in your landscape that can only accept approved transports, we recommend that you use the transport workflow to organize and coordinate the transport process.
To do this, set Workflow-controlled transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow.
When you release a transport request, the transport workflow starts automatically and the screen Create Transport Proposal appears. The requests are then released implicitly when the transport proposal is sent to the transport administrator.
Special transport workflow (mass transports)
You can use the special transport workflow to make transports that do not follow the defined transport routes or that take place outside the normal transport schedule (part of the mass transport strategy). These transports may be corrections made in the development system that have to be transported into the production system without delay.
To use the special transport workflow, set Mass transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow."
thanks. you have been most generous.
regards.

Org.structure differs on dev and production

Hi,
I'm developing a workflow and in one of the steps (activity step), I assign agent using organizational structure (position from HR). The problem is, that the org.structure differs on dev system and on production system. Mainly the IDs of position posts differ. How to solve this? Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Tomas

>
Tomas Linhart wrote:
> thanks for answer, I guess that's the best way of handling such situation. I'm going to creat custom table holding position used in workflow mapped to real position ID from org.structure. Or more generally, holding WF post mapped to org.structure type (position, job, ...) with corresponding ID in org.
I don't see why you need a custom table?
The org issues aside, all that is needed is to assign your org unit to the task. Then leave the agent assignment blank in your WF. Job done.
The other option is to create a dummy rule, which you thought was to be avoided. I don't agree, it takes 5 minutes, less effort than a table, less non-standard stuff ==> less explaining to people how to maintain & easier to troubleshoot.
Edit: Forgot to answer your other question
> I'm not sure if you consider org. replication the same as transport of org. I was thinking of transport myself, just didn't know the way how to. I've found transaction RE_RHMOVE30 (also acessible from customizing), that should do that, but am not sure, if that's the right one and/or what options to select when transporting. Also, I'm not sure if this would ensure the position/job IDs are the same on both systems.
Replication would be carried out via transports. The RHMOVE* reports can also be used, or you could even set up an ALE connection between DEV and PRD. However I still would not recommend it. The development system is where you would need to create test users and/or org units. The other alternative is to have a master data client. All of these are a great deal of work which only make sense in certain types of environments - certainly not for the sake of a workflow.
Edited by: Mike Pokraka on Sep 27, 2009 9:52 PM

System Properties user.timzone different between dev. and prod. system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for