System setting don't allow to modify IDOC ZSTB025

Hi Guys
I am creating connection between Prodcution R/3 and BW and when doing that i am getting the error message that
"system settingdoes not allow changes to be madeto object IDOC ZSTB025".
Actually for this activity system status has to be modifiable but we don't know what is the particualr component which we need to keep modifiable in SE06....as production is live in R/3, we can't make all the component modifiable.....
Can somebody please help me to identify that specific component which required to be opened for creating IDOC by the system during connectivity.
Regards
Kamal

Hello,
In se06 change component in customer development (HOME) .

Similar Messages

System setting does not allow changes to be made to object

Hi experts,
I implelemt ST-PI/A today and apply note 1300023. There is a information(???) message keep warning
"System setting does not allow changes to be made to object NOTE 0001300023". I think I should SE06 to modify system change option, but I don't know which one. Please help.

Hi,
If you login in German you can see the variable %1 being replaced by "SDF/" in the Help window.
Or you can find the text in the note:
«/SDF/CCMS_READ CCMS_CREATE_COMP_DOWNLOAD»
Go to SE03 and expand Administration node, Set System Change Option and set Namespace prefix /SDF to Modifiable.
Regards,
André Nunes

System setting does not allow changes to be made to object LSYS

Hi
Im trying to create the process chain in BW-Production System . Like im trying to delete the PSA data for one datasource in BI7.0 .
Im using the 'Delete requests from the PSA' process type in the process chain . When i try to give the datasource name and source system name in the variant of 'Delete requests from the PSA' process type and save them , then it is saying that
System setting does not allow changes to be made to object LSYS
Why it is saying like that . But i can able to include the other process types in the process chain .
regards
mohammed

Dear Mohammed,
Since you are trying to create process chain in production system.
Normally production system wont be open for development at any time. Why the system settings does not allow changes was, your production is not modifiable state.
Check the settings in SE06. system would be non-modifiable for sure.
in SCC4, settings ->"changes to the cross customizing objects would be not allowed"
These two settings/configurations would not allow any development or changes or edit or create in production.
Please check with your basis folks and proceed further.
Hope this would help you more in understanding

System setting does not allow... With implementing a SAPNOTE

Hi all,
I try to implement a manual activity of a SAPNOTE.
But, when I want to modify a Source Program with SE38, I obtain the error :
System setting does not allowe changes to be made to
object PROG RFUMSV25
The properties of client is which is open to modify of customizing from SCC4.
thank a lot
Davide

Yes ther is:
KE1K919403       BRUNODAVI2   Note Assistant - Nota n° 1150463
|
KE1K919404   BRUNODAVI2   Repair
- Documentation
- Single Message
- Report Source Code
- Report Texts
           |----- RFUMSV25
and this cr is transported into quality..!

System setting does not allow changes to be object CLAS /1SEM/CL_FACTORY_30

hi,
Recently we upgraded our BW system from BW 3.0B to BW 3.5.In BW 3.5,we created a planning area to which we
assigned a transactional cube.Now when we are going for creating variables or planning levels for the planning area it
gives the following error:
System setting does not allow changes to be object CLAS /1SEM/CL_FACTORY_300ZPLAN
Our support packages are as following:
SAP_BASIS       640                   0009
SAP_ABA         640                   0009
ST-PI           2005_1_640            0000
PI_BASIS        2004_1_640            0006
SAP_BW          350                   0009
BI_CONT         353                   0000
Could you please suggest or help us in resolving the issue ?
thanks and regards,
Yogesh

Hello,
the above mentioned note is too old. Please check note 781371.
Please also check in transaction SM30 view V_TRNSPACE
the record for /1SEM/:
Namespace:     /1SEM/
Namespace role C
Repair License
SSCR Popup     X
SAP Standard   X
Gen Objs Only X
Regards,
Gregor

File System Permissions Don't Allow "Staff" Group

This is just one of the many frustrations I've been having with my new Macbook Retina. I've had a macbook for 2.5 years at home, and it seems in the context of a corporate environment, Mac's are incredibly frustrating. Not to go on a rant (which I inevitably will anyway), I'll just focus on the latest problem I have.
I need to get files off of my Macbook from other machines on the network and home; some of these machines are Windows whilst some are Mac's. The problem I have is that often the permissions in my home directory are screwed. I've never touched permissions, but for some reason, some of my folders like my "Download" folder have had the "staff" group removed from them, so no domain admins are able to access my files in these directories. This would typically be a minor issue as I'd just change the permissions back to how they should be, but frustratingly, the "Staff" group apparently does not exist according to the People and Group picker.
This is obviously one of those many problems that arise from the fact that Apple's thin user-friendly veneer over unix isn't very solid. The amount of inconsistancies between concepts presented by the user-friendly UI and what's actually happening under the hood can make this operating system a nightmare to use.
Now, I intended to submit this via Apple's bug reporter website, but it won't load as usual. To be honest, I wonder if anyone at Apple even know that they have a bug reports website as they don't seem to attend to any bug reports or make sure it's working.
It's a terrible feeling being at the mercy of a company like Apple that don't seem to care a great deal about their customers. In this regard, they're no different to their archrival Microsoft.
Anyway, in my research it seems Apple's half-way through phasing out the staff group. I say half-way, because it's still the default group used by user-owned files and directories, and there doesn't seem to be any replacement. Does anyone know what group I should be using instead of the "staff" group, or otherwise how to add the staff group to these directories with broken permissions?

I have never had to mess around with permissions in the Get Info window, but there are other ways.
Do you have access to the other computers onto which you need to move files? Can you mount those folders on your MBP? If so, you could copy those files over from your Mac.
Can the other users see your Public folder (in your User directory)? You could make files available there for copying by others.
You can go to System Prefs/Sharing and add Shared Folders. (By the way, I'm assuming File Sharing is on, and in Options "Share files and folders using SMB" is checked.)
Hope this helps.

Mail is trying to modify yours systems setting

I get a pop up that states:
"Mail is trying to modify yours systems setting.
Type your password to allow this."
How do i get rid of this?

See this Apple note: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1274

TS3623 I had interruption on rented movie when attempt to return to movie , no library and said to go to downloads , guess what no download setting , will not allow repurchase through Apple TV now have to repurchase through iPad *** have you done to the o

I had interruption on rented movie when attempt to return to movie , no library and said to go to downloads , guess what no download setting , will not allow repurchase through Apple TV now have to repurchase through iPad *** have you done to the old syst

Thanks for the pointers folks. Yeah, 1.5GB is pretty poor isn't it? There are other suppliers, but you have to get a their phone line installed to access the internet so it's an £85 setup fee plus a day off work for a guy to come round and drill a hole in your wall before you even get to the monthly costs.
Don't get me wrong though - I'm certainly not an Apple basher, but am equally frustrated with both them and the ISP.
Virgin Media spend all kinds of money advertising their broadband as the fastest in the UK, but don't tell you (up front anyway) that you'll be cut off if you actually try and use it.
Apple on the other hand carry on with their 'it just works' mantra, but with Apple TV this only applies if you meet certain criteria (again, not mentioned up front).
I guess it aint a biggie, as i was gifted my Apple TV, and love all the other stuff it does, but from the number of posts on this forum can see that there's a lot of angry customers out there who want explanations as to why they're having similar problems to me.
Will be very interesting to see if Apple release any kind of software update that turns the flash drive from a buffer to permanent storage, to at least ease some of the pain...
Message was edited by: McGinty

"Don't allow sites that set removed cookies to set future cookies"

I'm having a problem shopping and/or logging onto esteelauder.com (a site I have shopped from for years). Their tech folks indicated the problem appears to be with cookies and I should make sure that "Don't allow sites that set removed cookies to set future cookies" is not marked. I cannot find this in FF 3.6.15. I have removed all cookies related to this web site, but the problem still exists. I went to another computer to make sure it was not the web site, and was able to add items to the cart and log on with no problem. I am using a PC with Windows 7. This problem has just shown up in the last couple of weeks and so far only appears to be on this web site.

* You can see the permissions for the domain in the current tab in Tools > Page Info > Permissions
* Create an allow cookie exception (Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: Exceptions) to keep such a cookie, especially for secure websites and if cookies expire when Firefox is closed.
* In [[Private Browsing]] mode all cookies are session cookies that expire if that session is ended, so websites won't remember you.
* Do not use [[Clear Recent History]] to clear the "Cookies" and the "Site Preferences"
Clearing "Site Preferences" clears all cookies, images, pop-up windows, software installation, and password exceptions.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Cookies
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Websites_report_cookies_are_disabled
If clearing the cookies doesn't help then it is possible that the file cookies.sqlite that stores the cookies is corrupted.
Rename (or delete) cookies.sqlite (cookies.sqlite.old) and delete cookies.sqlite-journal and cookies.txt, if they exist, in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Profile Folder] in case the file cookies.sqlite got corrupted.

APEX don't allow modify rows in columns which are Primary Key ?

I have tables:
http://img508.imageshack.us/my.php?image=21269582oe8.jpg
book(id_book - "Primary Key", title, year); book_author(id_book - "Primary Key", id_author - "Primary Key"); author(id_author - "Primary Key", name)
I have created a new page -> Form -> Tabular Form for table 'author' because I would like to add new authors, modify and delete. During creating this page I have choosen column 'id_author' as 'primary key column 1' and everything is OK (I can't modify column 'id_author' - this column is autoincrement and I can modify column 'name').
BUT I have also created a new page -> Form -> Tabular for table 'book_author' because I would like to write numbers as id_book and id_author, modify and delete them (so add relations between tables: book, book_author and author). During creating this page I have choosen column 'id_book' as 'primary key column 1' and 'id_author' as 'primary key column 2'. And on website I can't modify (edit) these fields. And I can't also add new row because I see in each column in new row: (null).
http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=11324615yk9.jpg
APEX don't allow modify rows in columns which are Primary Key ? This is stupid....... What can I do ?
Edited by: user10731158 on 2008-12-20 11:40

Single-column and non-meaningful so you never want to update them. In the case of your example, you would need to add an ID column to the book_author intersection table. Honestly, I was so blown away (and pleasantly surprised) by the lack of rebuttal and the "thx" that I went ahead and put together an example of how I would define the book_author table:
create table book_author
   (id varchar2(32),
    book_id varchar2(32),
     author_id varchar2(32),
     modified_on     date,
     modified_by varchar2(255),
     constraint book_author_pk primary key (id),
     constraint book_auth_book_fk foreign key (book_id) references books(id),
     constraint book_auth_author_fk foreign key (author_id) references authors(id)
create unique index book_author_uq on book_author (book_id,author_id)
create or replace trigger biu_book_author before insert or update on book_author
for each row
begin
     if inserting then
          :new.id := sys_guid();
     end if;
     modified_on := sysdate;
     modified_by := nvl(v('APP_USER'),user);
end;
/Good luck,
Tyler

[solved] systemd service files don't allow quotes

Why is it not possible to use quotes in
ExecStart=
section of systemd service files?
For example, I can't use service file like this
[Unit]
Description=Pacman mirrorlist update
[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=wget -O /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup "https://www.archlinux.org/mirrorlist/?country=DE&country=NL&country=PL&protocol=http&ip_version=4" && cp /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist && reflector --verbose -l 50 -p http --sort rate --save /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
because systemd will not run it because of presence of quotes:
Feb 26 08:48:36 nanoBox systemd[1]: [/etc/systemd/system/reflector.service:7] Executable path is not absolute, ignoring: wget -O /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist.backup "URL=http...
Feb 26 08:48:36 nanoBox systemd[1]: reflector.service lacks both ExecStart= and ExecStop= setting. Refusing.
I can remove quotes and then the service will run, but the URL parsed to the command will be cut in half, ie it will stop on the first "&" sign and only DE mirrors will be probed.
Is there some way around it other than creating a separate executable file and calling it from the service? I don't want to multiply unnecessary files if there's way around it.
Last edited by Lockheed (2015-02-26 09:37:25)

Lockheed wrote:
Raynman wrote:"from command line" is you feeding a (command) string to a shell. Your assumption is that systemd will treat whatever you put in ExecStart exactly the same as your shell would.
Not "is" but "was". Disappearance of that assumption was precisely the reason of starting this thread.
I had to read this a few times, but I think you mean it as follows. You assumed you could copy from the shell to the service file and it would work the same way. Then you got an error (about the abolute path) so that assumption "disappeared". So far so good. But you didn't exactly figure out what was different, you formed a new assumption and based your thread on that:
"systemd service files don't allow quotes" (title)
"Why is it not possible to use quotes in ExecStart= section of systemd service files"
"because systemd will not run it because of presence of quotes:"
Like frank604 says, quotes were never the issue (in fact, they are one of the few things with special meaning for both the shell and systemd), yet you still seem to think they were:
Lockheed wrote wrote:The actual wrong assumption on my part was that this command would run without quotes as service. It does not.
It is a shame you only quote the first part of my last reply and ignore the questions in the second part. You did almost the same thing with my reply before that and I suspect you also didn't read the man page I mentioned the first time. You basically give me the impression that you think you have it all figured out (even though you come here looking for help) and my follow-up questions aren't worth your time. That usually makes me "move along" pretty quickly, but I'm trying one last time, because even though "The service now works", I'd like to see that you actually understand why it didn't work before.
The only thing you really answered was "Changing paths to absolute made no difference.", but that shouldn't be, so when you mentioned empirical evidence, I basically repeated the question asking for some of this evidence (as in exact error messages for one or more modified ExecStart lines).
When I take your service file and give wget an absolute path, systemd happily executes wget, but then wget complains because it gets "&&" and "cp" and "--save" etc. as arguments. Those errors are what I see in systemctl status/journal, no longer anything about an absolute path. This is because "&&" has no special meaning. You can use semicolons (";") to separate commands instead (explained in the man page section on command lines) or multiple ExecStart lines like frank604 used (which is cleaner IMO).

How do I change my set up to allow my wife to connect to my iCloud accout too

How do I change my set up to allow my wife to connect to my iCloud accout too

You don't give a lot of information. Do you each have a separate device or Mac (or user account on the same Mac)? Do you each have your own separate iCloud accounts? If this is the case your wife can sign into your account in System Preferences (or Settings)>Mail Contacts and Calendars and check the data types she wants to sync. They will appear alongside her own iCloud data, though she will not be able to use Photo Stream with this account.

System settings does not allow changes to be made to object

Hi,
In one of my test system, when i tried to change the object its displaying following error message.
System settings does not allow changes to made to the object.
I have checked the settings in se03, regarding modification objects of software components and namespace those are in state of modifiable for this namespace object.
I would like to know, how to change the object in the namespace.
Regards
Srikanth

Hi,
In SE06, in addtion to system status and component status, check the namespace status too.
It would be better if you know the namespace of the object you are trying to modify. Set it to modifiable and retry.
To find namespace, open the object in SE80 and check the attributes. It would show assigned package, namespace, component etc.
Regards,
Srikishan

Alter system set nls_length_semantics

Hi all,
my question concerns the scope in the change of NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS can be performed.
The 10gR2 documentation only the
"Modifiable ALTER SESSION"
But what about altering the system and making your own setting to default for all sessions? With which scope?
I tried
alter system set nls_length_semantics='CHAR';
alter system set nls_length_semantics='CHAR' scope=spfile;
alter system set nls_length_semantics='CHAR' scope=both;
None had really any effect. Do I have to bounce the database?

Hello,
Do I have to bounce the database?Yes, you have to shutdown and startup the database.
Else the NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS change won't be effective.
You may have more details on the following thread:
nls_database_parameters->nls_length_semantics Help!
There's also an interesting Note from MOS:
Examples and limits of BYTE and CHAR semantics usage (NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS) [ID 144808.1]They give many information about NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS and the following Bug:
Bug 1488174
Problem: ALTER SYSTEM does not change the setting of NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS for the current and new (!) sessions.
Workaround: Don't use ALTER SYSTEM SET NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS scope=both; but set NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS as a init.ora parameter or issue ALTER SYSTEM SET NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS=CHAR scope=spfile; and bounce the database.Hope this help.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin
Edited by: Lubiez Jean-Valentin on May 27, 2010 2:06 PM

Reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre?

Dear Experts,
How to reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre?
Stock is reserved by creating reservation by MB21 for one cost centre e.g.CC1.
We want to restrict this stock for the same cost center CC1 only.
But when tried to issue stock to another cost center CC2, system allowed to post goods issue document.
System should not allow for goods issue of this stock to another cost center other than CC1.
How to make it.......please suggest.

I have checked
SPRO MM -- Inventory Management and Physical Inventory -- Reservation -- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
This is for reference document data copying.
Do you mean to say SPRO MM -- Inventory Management and Physical Inventory -- Reservation -- Set Dynamic Availability Check
Here for mvmt type 201 - valuation update - qty update - no special stock - Goods mvmt w/o reference - A (Dynamic Avl. chk) is the setting.
But system is not issuing the any message while issuing reserved stock to another cost center.
Please suggest...

System setting don't allow to modify IDOC ZSTB025

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for