System Sharing Transport in BI

Hi all,
We are sharing the BW server between companies. I have developed update rules and custom Infocubes for our requirements. However in development we share the transfer rules since the source system is shared as well. However in the Q Box we have a different source system and the same BW system. Since we shared transfer rules in the development box, what is the best way for me to take the same transfer rules and assign it to my (different) source system (So that we can have separate transfer rules in the same BW system)?
Cheers

You just need to import the transport request twice to your system and to switch between the two transports the conversion of logical system names in RSA1:
RSA1 -> Tools -> conversion of logical system names
Our landscape is BW Dev is connected to R/3 Dev, BW Q is connected to 4 R/3 Q and project integration testsystems and BW P is connected to R/3 P -> so if we transport a new rule from BW D to BW Q, we do this import to BW Q four times to connect all R/3 Q systems to our datamodell.
Hope this helps, best,
SB

Similar Messages

  • Shared transport directory best practices?

    Does anyone have any documentation / knowledge on using a shared transport directory - ie, BI, R3, SolMan, etc in the same '/usr/sap/trans/cofiles + data directories, or is it preferred to keep them separate?
    Currently, our R3 system shares one transport directory across the landscape, but BI, SRM, and Solution Manager do not.  While thinking about giving each of them their own shared directories (all BI systems share a directory, all SRM system share a directory, etc), I wondered if the preferred method is to have them all share a directory.
    I would appreciate any input, thank you.
    ~TJ

    There are different philosophies here, but mine is:
    Keep them separate so that a transport does not accidentally get moved to the wrong system.  I know that with QA worklist and workflow and other tools that can be incorporated to allow this to not happen, but there is always a chance that a transport gets approval but goes to the wrong system, as in SAP fixes.
    Hope this helps.

  • Deleting Variable in production system vis Transport request

    Hello,
    I need to delete a variable in production system via Transport request how can we do this?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Open the query in BEx in Development system, delete the variable form the query. The pop-up will arise for a new transport request. Capture the query in new request and then transport the same to Production.
    Regards,
    Yogesh.

  • Test System (BQ1) Objects showing up wrong Source System after Transport.

    Hi Experts,
    We are working on IS-U BI7.0 Project. We have finished with our Development and have transported the DataSources, Transformations and DTPs from Development (BD1) into Test (BQ1) Systems.
    We have entered values in the Conversion of Logical Source Systems correctly.
    When we select the DataSource and Click Object Directory Entry from the Extras Menu, we found that the Original Source System is defined as BQ1 instead of BD1 (Development System), which is where the Object is getting Transported from.
    We have implemented an SAP Note:1008633 (Incorrect Source System after Transport (RSTRAN 514) but couldn't resolve the issue.
    We basically want all the Objects in the BQ1 (Test System) showing the Original Source System as BD1 (Development System) but only the DataSources and it's connected Transformations and DTPs are originating from the BQ1 (Test) System itself (The Transformations when Transported from BD1 to BQ1 are Transported with a different Technical Name which is very strange).
    Had anyone faced similar problem and if so, what was the effective solution implemented.
    Any help in this regard is very much appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Best Regards,
    Chandu.

    It is resolved by our Basis.
    Thanks,
    Chandu

  • Changing Original System and Transport Target System for Objects

    Hi Gurus,
             I need to do mass transport of all the Infoobjects to newly defined system. Since these objects have different Original system. Its giving me error. Again, for other objects, Transport Target system is QAS, But we want to change it to NBW (A new system to which we want to send transport) . I am able to change package of Infoobjects. Is there mechanism to change Original System and Transport Target for System? Please let me know ASAP.
    Regards,
    Harpal
    Message was edited by:
            Harpalsinh Gohil

    If you simply edit your original post, it will go to the top of the list. There's no need to post duplicates.
    Subjects with a subject of "Urgent" will be filtered out by a lot of responders.
    Why not close this thread and bump the other one?
    Rob

  • Web Interfaces can be displayed incorrectly in QA system after transported

    Dears,
      I transported Web Interfaces for BPS from D system to Q system. I activate the BSP application in transation SE80 and activate the service node in transaction SICF in Q system. However, the BSP can't be displayed correctly with NO_METADATA_AVAILABE error.Also, I test the HTTP service in Q system, it works well. The transport steps I followed:
    1) change the package of BSP application (SE80 D system)
    2) write transport entry to new request (SE80 D system)
    3) switch the correspoding service node to new object directory entry (SICF D system)
    4) transport the request to Q system
    5) activate BSP application (SE80 Q system)
    6) activate BSP service node (SICF Q system)
    Am I missing configuring something? or completely wrong steps? Any suggestions are appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Gerald

    I resolved it myself

  • Adding new system in transport route

    Hi,
    I want to add new system in transport domain. Please advice me .
    I have done through SE06--PERFORM POST INSTALLATION ACTIVITYS
    but in STMS iam getting message as TMS configuration is not for this system.
    Regards,
    Asif
    Edited by: Asif Ahamed on Nov 30, 2009 10:44 AM

    Hi,
    Take a look:
    http://www.tamboly.com/ExpandTheTransportDomain.html
    Regards
    Mark

  • One SLD means rename of SAP system after transport?

    On development got the situation of having naming conventions for SAP boxes like R3<b>D</b>CLNT100 within the configuration directory. Do I have to rename manually my systems after a transport to Q into R3<b>Q</b>CLNT100?

    Hi Yuki
    Does it matter what transport system you are using? File transport system or the CMS?
    Normally, you define a business system as transport target, which is different from the business system the transport target is being defined for.
    If we have the requirement to have the following transport targets:
    BS_MJD (Dev) -> BS_MJQ (Tst) -> BS_MJP (Prd)
    we should always define a target for that system?
    Best regards,
    Marco

  • Locationg source system object  transport request number in target system .

    Hi,
    After the object is pushed from source system to target using SCC1 for cross clients but same systems or STMS for cross-systems, if we want to see the object's source system's transport request number in the target system, how can we see that ?
    Regards,
    Rajesh.

    Hi Rajesh
    If my understanding is correct you want to know the source server in the target system( i.e where we have transported).
    For cross-system objects, as you know we use STMS to transport them...
    In the target system:
    1. SE10
    2. Click on Transports button.
    3. Select the required request and expand the node.
    4. You will have the first one which has log only for Export.
    The node with only Export log is the source system...
    Hope this helps...
    Kind Regards
    Eswar

  • All Values Deleted from Target System when transporting new values added

    Hi,
    Wasn't really sure where to put this question.
    I created a maintenance view between two Z tables. A main key table and a text table.
    I added the new values to the maintenance view and transported successfully.
    I then had a request to create 3 more values.
    I added these three and transported these to the target QA system.
    However when the transport completed, all entries bar one had been deleted from the Z table but the Z text table had all existing entries plus the three new ones.
    I've tried manually creating a transport and adding all 10 entries but this has the same problems.
    If I SCC1 the entry from one dev client to another it works fine.
    Has anyone come across this problem befor and know how to resolve it?
    Many Thanks
    David

    Yes, I managed to sort it.
    This is what I did:
    I created a new blank transport.
    For the task created under the transport I then opened the task object list.
    I then added two entries in this list. i.e. one for each table that was in the view.
    My entries where:
    Entry 1:
    Program ID: R3TR
    Object Type: TABU
    Object Name: ZNR_REASON
    Then click on the key icon and add:
    Table Name: ZNR_REASON
    Table Keys: 200* (NOTE 200 is our development client). The '*' is needed to that ALL entries are included in the transport.
    Entry 2:
    Program ID: R3TR
    Object Type: TABU
    Object Name: ZNR_REASONT
    Then click on the key icon and add:
    Table Name: ZNR_REASONT
    Table Keys: 200* (As above 200 is our development client). Again the '*' is needed to that ALL entries are included in the transport.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    David

  • Are there suggestions for managing Multiple VMWare Fusion systems sharing files with a MacBook?  Suppose I have enough ram for 3 servers to share files.

    Suppose I have enough ram for 2 or three VMWare fusion systems to that could benefit from file sharing.  Is it possible to configiure each VMWare funsion instance to have a common read only file share on my desktop and a common read/write area on on my desktop? 
    This would allow me to extend the power and mustle of my Mac Book Air, Retina Display system to its best advantage.  Whether native Mac processing or speciality linux or Windows systems as needed.
    I am having trouble allowing more than one system to share the same read only and the same read/write areas so that software does the file locking and merge controls.  Even if these do not share a common read/write area, it would be truly handy for drive space management for them to share a common read only area.
    Thanks for your thoughtful input.
    20 year IT Professional that loves Mac visual interfaces, outstanding performance and a *nix command line. 
    Don

    It really denpends on the os running in the vm and what the permissions are set to on those shares.
    I run a few vms on both a mac at home and windows at work and all other computers in my home or at work can connect to the vms without any problems. Even multiple computer at the same time.
    It also depends on how you have set the vm up for networking. If you are setting it up as nat, instead of bridged, that can also cause problems access it from multiple system. With nat the vm is on its own network branch.

  • BSP pages in test system after transport have same URL as development

    Hi. I have just transported some BSP's from our development into our test system and have encountered a problem.
    The URL's of each page is the same as it was in the development system, so when we try and use the pages in the test system we get a "service can not be reached" error.
    I am relatively new to BSPs and this is the first time I have transported them. I presumed the URL would update to reflect each server.
    Have I missed a setting or something? I searched on SDN but could not find a similar post.
    Thanks a lot for your help.
    Regards,
    Dave.

    Hi,
    check whether the service is active in transaction SICF
    (it may become inactive, when there is patch applied, upgrade , etc)
    then you will get one screen there then what you need to do is
    without entering anything just click execute and expand the tree to
    default_hots->sap->bc->bsp->sap-> under this node you should be able to see your BSP name . right click on it and click activate.
    here The BSP Name is nothing but the BSP Application name. When you create a BSP applicaiton, a SICF service is created along with the BSP application. All the request that the user makes to this BSP application is processed by the service only with the help of this corresponding SICF service.
    regards
    Bhavana

  • File System Sharing using Sun Cluster 3.1

    Hi,
    I need help on how to setup and configure the system to share a remote file system that is created on a SAN disk (SAN LUN ) between two Sun Solaris 10 servers.
    The files in the remote system should be read/writabe from both the solaris servers concurrently.
    As a security policy NFS mount is not allowed. Some one suggested it can be done by using Sun Cluster 3.1 agents on both servers. Any details on how I can do this using Sun Cluster 3.1 is really appreciated.
    thanks
    Suresh

    You could do this by installing Sun Cluster on both systems and then creating a global file system on the shared LUN. However, if there was significant write activity on both nodes, then the performance will not necessarily what you need.
    What is wrong with the security of NFS? If it is set up properly I don't think this should be a problem.
    The other option would be to use shared QFS, but without Sun Cluster.
    Regards,
    Tim
    ---

  • Target System in transport request is blank

    Hi
    I set the transport system in a scenario DEV, QAS and PRD.
    When I create an order request, the field target system is blank.
    Where should I set it for me automatically display the system QAS as a system target ?
    Thanks,
    Enrique

    Hi,
    just adding my solution for future references..
    I had similar problem but when I checked our transport package it was showing wrong transport layer..
    Make sure your present transport package transport layer attribute is correct or not by using se21 or se80.
    we have entered correct transport layer under our package and all working fine.

  • One Library for all users on the system - Sharing?

    Hello.
    I'm using iTunes 9.0.3 on OS X 10.6.2. On this system, there are TWO users, one for my wife, one for me. I'd like to "merge" the seperate iTunes libraries, so that there's only one shared library for all users.
    How could this be achieved?
    Searching the web, I found a writeup on [dougscripts.com by Paul Whitey|http://dougscripts.com/itunes/itinfo/sharedlib.php], which basically explains to move ~/Music/iTunes to /Users/Shared/iTunes and making sure that there's an alias in ~/Music pointing to /Users/Shared/iTunes. It also explains, that the ownership of the files & folders is to be changed so, that all users have read & write access. This then looks like this on my system:
    !http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/6223/fileinfowithbothusersha.png!
    -> http://yfrog.com/5yfileinfowithbothusershap
    It works good - both "alex" and "sandra" can work with these files (ie. move them, rename them, change ID3 tags).
    But see those:
    !http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2183/fileinfowithonlyalexhav.png! !http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/7807/fileinfowithonlysandra4.png!
    --> http://yfrog.com/jufileinfowithonlyalexhavp & http://yfrog.com/j2fileinfowithonlysandra4p
    That's from files which sandra or alex have added later on. Only the one who added these files can modify them (which is of course correct, if you have a look at the file permissions).
    How would you go about having only ONE iTunes database on the system? Simply putting the iTunes Db on a shared folder doesn't work well, as can be seen above. Always having to fiddle around with the file permissions isn't exactly comfortable…
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Hm. PowerTunes crashs, when I make it Share my library. I pasted the crash report at http://pbox.ca/13gwy
    Since I cannot know how/if would work (because of the crash…), please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it also just move the files to /Users/Shared and set permissions correctly? Wouldn't I need to keep on running PowerTunes from time to time, or is it "run once and forget" application (if it works)?

Maybe you are looking for