System takes long time to Save/Activate using SFP Form Builder

We are planning to customize the Travel Expense PDF Form PTRV_EXPENSE_FORM in ECC 6.0 using transaction SFP FORM BUILDER (ABAP Workbench). As the initial step we copied it into Z form and started the changes. Here is the problem: Even for a small change on the Layout, system is taking long time to complete the process.
For example:
For Saving the changes: 6 to 7 minutes
For Activating the changes: 12 to 13 minutes.
On the server side :
we are on ECC 6.0, SAP NW04s SP 9 for EA-HR
ADOBE LiveCycle Designer 7.1 (Patch 3 applied).
On client machine :
we have SAP GUI 640 Patch Level 21,
ADOBE Reader 7.0.9.
Client machine has 1 GB RAM & 40 GB Hard Drive.
Thanks in Advance for the quick reply.

Same problem for us

Similar Messages

Take long time to save issue

dear all
what symptoms can i tested when systems throw entranet and internet take long time to save?
thanks

Hello,
To save what ? commit data?
maybe you could have the start of an answer by reading the following:
http://groundside.com/blog/GrantRonald.php?title=oracle_forms_can_you_get_it_to_perform_o&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Francois

Message Mapping takes long time to save and activate

I have one problem in my present interface...
the message structure is large and when mappping is over and I click save button it will take long time for activation..
should I change any parameter in admin? or is it bcos of java web start version?
need help
- Teja

Hi
Can you share the Version History of the Component?
Regards
Pothana

SMD - Diagnostic Administration -- Managed Systems takes long time

Hi All,
On SMD administration URL , http://system:50000/smd ---> Diagnostics administration ---> Agent Administration --> managed systems takes very long time.
Sometimes it never ends and keep on going...
CPU utilization is also very high...
Have anyone encountered this issue ?
We are using Solman 7.00 on Solaris, DB is oracle.
Thanks!

Reply with ur System Technical Note,
find below DOCS for Solman System Technical Config,
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000255562007E/Sizing_Guide_SM_70_SP15.pdf
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=OBJECT&_HIER_KEY=501100035870000015092&_HIER_KEY=601100035870000179416&_HIER_KEY=601100035870000179443&_HIER_KEY=701100035871000457214&#HOME
Basically SMD is mostly dependant on J2ee Heap and Abap Configuration. Set up the required Heap and T-Code ST02 paramaters properly and call the SMD again.
Regards
Srikanth Mandalapu
Edited by: srikanth mandalapu on Oct 10, 2008 12:11 AM

Query take long time in fetching when used within a procedure

The Database is : Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
Query just takes a second from toad but when used inside a procedure as a cursor it takes takes 3 to 5 minutes.
Following is the Tkprof information when running from procedure.
SELECT CHCLP.CLM_PRVDR_TYPE_LKPCD, CHCLP.PRVDR_LCTN_IID, TO_CHAR
(CHCLP.MODIFIED_DATE, 'MM-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') MODIFIED_DATE,
CHCLP.PRVDR_LCTN_IDENTIFIER, CHCLP.CLM_HDR_CLM_LN_X_PVDR_LCTN_SID
FROM
CLM_HDR_CLM_LN_X_PRVDR_LCTN CHCLP WHERE CHCLP.CLAIM_HEADER_SID = :B1 AND
CHCLP.CLAIM_LINE_SID IS NULL AND CHCLP.IDNTFR_TYPE_CID = 7
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 110.79 247.79 568931 576111 0 3
total 2 110.79 247.79 568931 576111 0 3
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (CMSAPP) (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
0 PARTITION RANGE (SINGLE) PARTITION:KEYKEY
0 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID) OF
'CLM_HDR_CLM_LN_X_PRVDR_LCTN' (TABLE) PARTITION:KEYKEY
0 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF
'XAK1CLM_HDR_CLM_LN_X_PRVDR_LCT' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
PARTITION:KEYKEY
Execution plan when running just the query from TOAD is: (it comes out in a second)
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 6 Bytes: 100 Cardinality: 2
     3 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE Cost: 6 Bytes: 100 Cardinality: 2 Partition #: 1 Partitions accessed #13
          2 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID TABLE CMSAPP.CLM_HDR_CLM_LN_X_PRVDR_LCTN Cost: 6 Bytes: 100 Cardinality: 2 Partition #: 2 Partitions accessed #13
Why would fetching take such a long time? Please let me know if you need any other information.
Thank You.
Edited by: spur230 on Apr 1, 2009 10:23 AM
Edited by: spur230 on Apr 1, 2009 10:26 AM
Edited by: spur230 on Apr 1, 2009 10:28 AM
Edited by: spur230 on Apr 1, 2009 10:30 AM

Query just takes a second from toad It's possible that the query starts returning rows in a second, but that's not the time required for the entire query.

Data loading from source system takes long time.

Hi,
I am loading data from R/3 to BW. I am getting following message in the monitor.
Request still running
Diagnosis
No errors could be found. The current process has probably not finished yet.
System response
The ALE inbox of the SAP BW is identical to the ALE outbox of the source system
and/or
the maximum wait time for this request has not yet run out
and/or
the batch job in the source system has not yet ended.
Current status
in the source system
Is there anything wrong with partner profile maintanance in the source system.
Cheers
Senthil

Hi,
I will suggest you to check a few places where you can see the status
1) SM37 job log (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load) (give request name) and it should give you the details about the request. If its active make sure that the job log is getting updated at frequent intervals.
Also see if there is any 'sysfail' for any datapacket in SM37.
2) SM66 get the job details (server name PID etc from SM37) and see in SM66 if the job is running or not. (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load). See if its accessing/updating some tables or is not doing anything at all.
3) RSMO see what is available in details tab. It may be in update rules.
4) ST22 check if any short dump has occured.(In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load)
5) SM58 and BD87 for pending tRFCs and IDOCS.
Once you identify you can rectify the error.
If all the records are in PSA you can pull it from the PSA to target. Else you may have to pull it again from source infoprovider.
If its running and if you are able to see it active in SM66 you can wait for some time to let it finish. You can also try SM50 / SM51 to see what is happening in the system level like reading/inserting tables etc.
If you feel its active and running you can verify by checking if the number of records has increased in the data tables.
SM21 - System log can also be helpful.
Thanks,
JituK

Why it takes long time to query ldap using the filter (uid=*) after deleting all(140000) the entries from the LDAP.

The platform we are using is Iplanet 5.1 running on Solaris 8 with Sun 280R dual processor 900Mhz with 4GB ram

Are you using replication? If so, this may be due to the fact that the database is now full of tombstone entries. So, how do you get rid of the tombstone entries? That depends on your update rate and the number of servers you replicate to, plus how painful it is to reinitialize all of the consumers.
If your tombstone purging is too aggressive, you risk losing state information you need during update resolution.
If you don't care about any of this, the easiest thing to do is to export your database then reimport. After this, you will have to reinitialize the other servers as well.

MIRO take long time when enter invoice for PO with GR-based invoice

Hi,
In my client system, system take long time for extracting PO data while booking invoice via. MIRO for the purchase order which have GR-based IV is marked. However system take few second for extracting PO data when enter invoice via. MIRO for the PO which don't have GR-based IV. Please note following point while providing the solution:
- this problem is exist only for the purchase order related to one company code. However system working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence we assuming that some company code level cofiguration is missing.
- the problem is exist for po with account assignment K.
- we have one to one mapping for purchase organization to company code to plant.
Appreciate for you quick respond. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
sp sahu

Hi,
Please check with FI guy for GL A/c and Cost centers which you are using to create the PO with item category K.
Still problem permits check with your ABAP person.
Regards,
Mohd Ali.

Oracle9i reports take longer time while running in web

Hi,
I have developed few reports in Oracle9i and I am trying to run the reports in web. Running a report through report builder takes lesser time compare to running the same report in web using web.show_document. This also depends on the file size. If my report file size(.jsp file) is less than 100KB then it takes 1 minute to show the parameter form and another 1 minute to show the report output. If my file size is around 190KB then the system takes atleast 15 minutes to show the parameter form. Another 10 to 15 minutes to show the report output. I don't understand why the system takes long time to show the parameter form.
I have a similar problem while opening the file in reports builder also. If my file size is more than 150KB then it takes more than 15 minutes to open the file.
Could anyone please help me on this.
Thanks, Radha

This problem exists only with .jsp reports. I saved the reports in .rdf format and they run faster on web now. Opening a .jsp report takes longer time(file with 600KB takes atleast 2 hours) but the same report in .rdf format takes few seconds to get opened in reports builder.

HT4759 Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why

Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why I need to deactivate the space service and take my money back .. Thanks

The "issues" you've raised are nothing to do with the iCloud service.
No service that uploads data allows you to disconnect the device you are uploading from while uploading data. Doing so would prevent the upload from completing. It is a basic requirement for any uploading service that you remain connected to it for uploading to be possible.
The time it takes to upload data to iCloud is entirely dependent on how fast your Internet connection is, and how much data you are uploading. Both of these things are completely out of Apple's control. Whichever upload service you use will be affected by the speed of your Internet connection.

Brachive takes long time to copy from one system to another

HI TO ALL,
I AM USING IBM BLADE SERVER AND CONNET TO SAN WHEN I SHEDULE BRARCIVE / BRBACKUP ON ANOTHER SERVER (ANY SERVER ) IT TAKES LONG TIME TO COPY ARCHIVE FROM ONE SYSTEM TO OTHER SYSTEM.
I AM USING DB ORACLE 9i and SAP 4.7 EXT 1.1
REGARDS,
VIKAS NAGAR

- how big are the files you copy?
- are both machines connected in the same network segment?
Markus

INSERT INTO TABLE using SELECT takes long time

Hello Friends,
--- Oracle version 10.2.0.4.0
--- I am trying to insert around 2.5 lakhs records in a table using INSERT ..SELECT. The insert takes long time and seems to be hung.
--- When i try to SELECT the query fetches the rows in 10 seconds.
--- Any clue why it is taking so much time

vishalrs wrote:
Hello Friends,hello
>
>
--- Oracle version 10.2.0.4.0
alright
--- I am trying to insert around 2.5 lakhs records in a table using INSERT ..SELECT. The insert takes long time and seems to be hung.
I don't know how a lakh is, but it sounds like a lot...
--- When i try to SELECT the query fetches the rows in 10 seconds.
how did you test this? and did you fetch the last record, or just the first couple of hundred.
--- Any clue why it is taking so much timeWithout seeing anything, it's impossible to tell the reason.
Search the forum for "When your query takes too long"

I have the current Mac Pro the entry level with the default specification and i feel some slow performance when applying after effects on my videos using final cut pro and also rendering a video takes long time ? what upgrades do you guys suggest?

i have the current Mac Pro the entry level with the default configuration and i feel lack of performance when applying after effects on my videos using final cut pro and also rendering a video takes long time ? what upgrades do you guys suggest i could do on my Mac Pro ?

256GB SSD it shipped with will run low and one of the things to watch.
Default memory is 12GB also something to think about.
D500 and FCP-X 10.1+
http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013Performance
Five models of 2013 Mac Pro running Resolve, FCPX, After Effects, Photoshop, and Aperture

When I use update software from my mobile it take long time for checking update software and no thing happened to update my IOS software

When I use update software from my mobile it take long time for checking update software and no thing happened to update my IOS software

Servers have been swamped. Keep trying and be patient. Wait a few days.

The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

Hi experts,
The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
I have checked the note 382329,
-> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
-> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
   PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
Please suggest.

The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
Thanks Hope this helps ..

System takes long time to Save/Activate using SFP Form Builder

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for