System usage per user

Hi Security Experts,
Our company have a SAP system version ECC 5.0 and right now we are making an analysis related to the quantity of users and the quality of the system usage per user, so the question here is if there's a way to know how much resources does an user consume? this is, time connected, transactions used. This is in order to separate the occasional users from the operating users?
I'll appreciate a lot your help.
Best Regards,
Erik Espinosa

Hi
ST03N is your solution.
There you find every minute detail for performance in the SAP system.
You can check User Profiles for days , weeks and months individually to check the response times, data executions from the database etc.
You can also find the processes/ transactions that take the highest memory consumption.
Apart from this, an earlywatch report from the system would also assist you in such an analysis.
I hope this helps
Regards
CHEN

Similar Messages

Memory usage per user

Hi folks, I once heard about a rule of thumb (ROT) to use when estimating how
much server memory to allocate for each end-user. Anyone remember this
amount...
Thanks...

Hi,
I recommend you run using the default which is Dynamic Fair Share Scheduling (aka Distributed Fair Share Scheduling) enabled and monitor to see if you experience problems. For details on how fair share limits per session cpu usage, please see Chapter 5 of
Windows Internals, Part 1, 6th Edition:
Windows Internals, Part 1 (6th Edition)
http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Internals-Edition-Developer-Reference/dp/0735648735
The above provides information on Server 2008 R2. In Server 2012 fair share cpu has been improved for heavier loads and new functionality has been added to distribute network bandwidth and disk IO among sessions as well. Precise details
on how network and disk fair share work have not been published.
Windows System Resource Manager is not available for Server 2012 R2.
You may want to consider writing your own programs to monitor/alert on resource usage per tenant and/or purchasing third party software. Server 2012 R2 RDSH is excellent, however, it is not designed for full multi-tenancy. If you
need strong isolation/control of each tenant in terms of security, resources, etc., then unfortunately each tenant needs to be in a separate VM.
-TP

Solution to cap/control internet usage per user?

On Mac OS or within Airport, is it possible to cap the internet usage of some of the users connected to an Airport netowrk? Is it easy to control the bandwidth usage or to allocate a specific amount og 'authorised' GB to download per month? Are they utilities to do that? Thanks for your answers!

The only feature that the square 802.11b/g/n AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) has is the ability to limit connection of specific MAC addresses to certain hours of the day. This is in AirPort Utility under "Access Control".
The AEBS has no feature which allows you to control the bandwidth allocated to each client. Nor does it have any feature which tracks how much data a client has used.
OS X's parental controls also offers some in the area of Internet access. You would need to visit the appropriate OS X discussion area and ask about them specifically.

Calculate shared_pool usage per user

Hi,
is there a query that shows how much of shared_pool is allocated to diffrent users? ideally showing the db user and os user or machine name etc...
i suspect i have memory fragmentation and need to see who's code is causing it...

Mark D Powell wrote:
Are you encountering ORA-04031 or ORA-04030 errors? From your earlier comments I expect you are hitting ORA-04030 because all of memory has ended up being allocated to the shared_pool.
Here is a reference to a basic document on AMM (Oracle support account required)
Automatic Memory Management(AMM) on 11g #443746.1
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=KBHome(page=KBHome&id=()),(page=KBNavigator&id=(bmDocID=443746.1&bmDocType=BULLETIN&bmDocDsrc=KB&bmDocTitle=Automatic%20Memory%20Management(AMM)%20on%2011g&viewingMode=1143&from=BOOKMARK))
Master Note for Diagnosing ORA-4030 #1088267.1
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=KBHome(page=KBHome&id=()),(page=KBNavigator&id=(bmDocID=1088267.1&bmDocType=BULLETIN&bmDocDsrc=KB&bmDocTitle=Master%20Note%20for%20Diagnosing%20ORA-4030&viewingMode=1143&from=BOOKMARK))
Master Note for Diagnosing ORA-4031 #1088239.1
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=KBHome(page=KBHome&id=()),(page=KBNavigator&id=(bmDocID=1088239.1&bmDocType=BULLETIN&bmDocDsrc=KB&bmDocTitle=Master%20Note%20for%20Diagnosing%20ORA-4031&viewingMode=1143&from=BOOKMARK))
The acutal Oracle error messages being encountered would be useful. Do you have minimum memory amounts assigned to any paramerters for shared pool, sga, ...?
HTH -- Mark D Powell --the actual error is
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4064 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","SELECT SUBSTR(PAC.NAME,0,15)...","sga heap(1,0)","kglsim heap")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4064 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","SELECT OPR.NAME, MAX(NVL(DBC...","sga heap(1,0)","kglsim heap")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4064 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","SELECT SUM(CPU_COUNT_CURRENT...","sga heap(1,0)","kglsim heap")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4016 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","sga heap(1,0)","kwqmncal: allocate buffer")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 3896 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","sga heap(2,0)","kglsim object batch")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 3896 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","select sysdate+(16)/(24*60) ...","sga heap(2,0)","kglsim object batch")
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 3896 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","sga heap(2,0)","kglsim object batch")
i have pre set shared pool to 1050M which solved problem for short term ( oracle support suggested to pre set this parameter ).
for some strange reason AMM is setting
sga_max_size 3920M
SQL>show parameters memor
NAME TYPE VALUE
hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 3920M
memory_target big integer 3920M
shared_memory_address integer 0
SQL>show parameetrs sga
SP2-0158: unknown SHOW option "parameetrs"
Total System Global Area 4092055552 bytes
Fixed Size 2232888 bytes
Variable Size 4026535368 bytes
Database Buffers 50331648 bytes
Redo Buffers 12955648 bytes
i tried setting it to 0 alter ysstem set sga max size = 0 .... but oracle keeps setting it to 3920 ...
tried presetting shared pool to 2 GB cause soo much performance issue so i reduced it back to
shared_pool_size big integer 1056M
Edited by: user9198889 on Jan 28, 2011 9:51 AM

Creating native MSI bundle that is "per user"-based (not "system"-based)

I am trying to collect all information in order to create a native MSI bundle that is "per user" based - but failed.
This means:
(.) The MSI should install into the user's local directory
(.) There should be no admin permission required
When using the default <fx:deploy ... nativebundle="msi" ...>-ANT-element, then the MSI is created "system wide" based, installing in "/Prorgram Files" and requiring an admin permission.
In the Oracle docu (http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/deployment/self-contained-packaging.htm) there is no concrete hint how to create "per user" based MSI files. Maybe, someone already has done this and could tell the imprortant steps...
THANKS!
PS: I know - using the .exe-bundling with Inno Setup will create "per user" based installers by default, but I do not want to use .exe if possible

Try
<fx:preferences install="false"/>
although the parameter name doesn't give much indication that it's system vs per user :)
I checked that the MSI bundler code and it should honor this.
Let me know if this works (I don't have time to try myself today and am leaving on Holidays for a week so won't be able to check until I'm back).
Mark

Does the Airport extreme provide any sort of usage reporting? Either per user or aggregate usage of the broadband port

Does the Airport extreme provide any sort of usage reporting? Either per user or aggregate usage of the broadband port

No. You may be able to retrieve that information from your ISP.

Windows Installer repair issue for per-user folders/files

Intro:
I have doubts that this is the right place to ask about this, since this issue has existed for me on many windows platforms, please suggest where this should be forwarded if this is an inappropriate place to ask.
Please do not be confused by the directory paths for XP, this issue is also true for Windows 7.
Description:
Windows Installer does not repair files in per-user directories, such as [AppDataFolder], when initial installation is performed using system account (for example - distributing the package through SCCM or using psexec) and repairing under a user with administrative
privileges (limited user repair works fine).
Example.
.msi installation installs a custom .xml configuration file to "[AppDataFolder]". We're installing .msi by using psexec /s. log output:
MSI (s) (D8:F0) [15:19:01:214]: Executing op: FileCopy(SourceName=SETTIN~2.CON|customXML,SourceCabKey=customXML,DestName=customXML,Attributes=16384,FileSize=2633,PerTick=32768,,VerifyMedia=1,,,,,CheckCRC=0,,,InstallMode=58982400,HashOptions=0,HashPart1=-1992414570,HashPart2=1238809189,HashPart3=-80616146,HashPart4=146746036,,)
MSI (s) (D8:F0) [15:19:01:214]: File: c:\WINDOWS\system32\config\systemprofile\Application Data\customXML;
To be installed; Won't patch;
No existing file
MSI (s) (D8:F0) [15:19:01:214]: Source for file 'customXML' is compressed
MSI (s) (D8:F0) [15:19:01:230]: Note: 1: 2318 2: c:\WINDOWS\system32\config\systemprofile\Application Data\customXML
When a user with administrative credentials accesses the advertised shortcut repair is run on the component that has the .xml configuration file, event viewer has an entry about this.
The verbose repair log file shows the following entry:
MSI (s) (D8:E4) [15:22:27:667]: Executing op: FileCopy(SourceName=SETTIN~2.CON|customXML,SourceCabKey=customXML,DestName=customXML,Attributes=16384,FileSize=2633,PerTick=32768,,VerifyMedia=1,,,,,CheckCRC=0,,,InstallMode=16908288,HashOptions=0,HashPart1=-1992414570,HashPart2=1238809189,HashPart3=-80616146,HashPart4=146746036,,)
MSI (s) (D8:E4) [15:22:27:667]: File: c:\WINDOWS\system32\config\systemprofile\Application Data\customXML;
Won't Overwrite; Won't patch;
Existing file is unversioned and unmodified - hash matches source file
Limited user repair log reads:
MSI (s) (78:8C) [15:26:27:406]: Executing op: FileCopy(SourceName=SETTIN~2.CON|customXML,SourceCabKey=customXML,DestName=customXML,Attributes=16384,FileSize=2633,PerTick=32768,,VerifyMedia=1,,,,,CheckCRC=0,,,InstallMode=16908288,HashOptions=0,HashPart1=-1992414570,HashPart2=1238809189,HashPart3=-80616146,HashPart4=146746036,,)
MSI (s) (78:8C) [15:26:27:406]: File: c:\Documents and Settings\test\Application Data\customXML;
To be installed; Won't patch;
No existing file
Your suggestions will be very much appreciated.

Hello,
Did you ever get to the root cause of this?
I have a similar problem with a custom XML that is reported as "empty or is not a xml file." in the logs.
Wondered if you had found the root cause?
Kind regards,
Sio.

ISE 1.2 & AD & Meraki - Per User Group Policy ?

I am working on a PoC for a deployment in an MDU. We are using Meraki switches and access points. There are 250 units in the building, each unit will have it's own subnet. The goal is to have the tenant be able to connect to a common building SSID and be placed into their assigned VLAN. There will also be physical ports in each unit that will need to do the same. I am trying to figure out a way to use ISE to authorize on a per user basis and not based on groups of users. On the Meraki system there are group policies that will assign the VLAN for the user as well as any type of layer 7 firewalling and bandwidth control. So there will be 250 group policies, one for each unit. There is a deployment guide that shows how to setup ISE for use with Meraki and it is great but it assumes that there will be large groups like Employees, Contractors, etc.. that will be used. This is where I'm being tripped up, also... this is my first swing at a NAC deployment so I have a lot to learn.
1.Can I setup each user in Active Directory to have a tag that ISE can then forward on to Meraki for the group policy? Say it's unit 101 and I have a group policy called 101 in Meraki, Meraki documentation says to use the Airespace-ACL-Name attribute in ISE to indicate the group policy to use. This gives me the ability to place a group into that policy but not an individual. Or would this be better done by creating the users in ISE directly? Omit AD entirely?
2. Each unit will have devices that will need MAB because they are not 802.1x compatible. I need to do the same as above with them. I would create a separate SSID for these devices but then use the MAC address to authenticate them but will need to authorize them to go into a specific group policy.
I know this isn't a typical ISE application but I think that this will work really well in the end, just need to iron out these details and get a test system functioning. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
Thanks,
Nathan

Please find the Meraki_ISE integration doc. in attachment.
When VLAN tagging is configured per user, multiple users can be associated to the same SSID, but their traffic is tagged with different VLAN IDs. This configuration is achieved by authenticating wireless devices or users against a customer-premise RADIUS server, which can return RADIUS attributes that convey the VLAN ID that should be assigned to a particular user’s traffic.
In order to perform per-user VLAN tagging, a RADIUS server must be used with one of the following settings:
MAC-based access control (no encryption)
WPA2-Enterprise with 802.1x authentication
A per-user VLAN tag can be applied in 3 different ways:
The RADIUS server returns a Tunnel-Private-Group-ID attribute in the Access-Accept message, which specifies the VLAN ID that should be applied to the wireless user. This VLAN ID could override whatever may be configured in the MCC (which could be no VLAN tagging, or a per-SSID VLAN tag). To have this VLAN ID take effect, “RADIUS override” must be set to “RADIUS response can override VLAN tag” under the Configure tab on the Access Control page in the “VLAN setup” section.
The RADIUS server returns a group policy attribute (e.g., Filter-ID) in the Access-Accept message. The group policy attribute specifies a group policy that should be applied to the wireless user, overriding the policy configured on the SSID itself. If the group policy includes a VLAN ID, the group policy’s VLAN ID will be applied to the user.
On the Client Details page, a client can be manually assigned a group policy. If the group policy includes a VLAN ID, the group policy’s VLAN ID will be applied to the user.

Payment Distribution to Artists by per user plays, rather than total plays

Hello!
I just had a thought about how payment is distributed to artists that I wanted to see if anyone might have some thoughts on. Spotify still does come under criticism on occasion for artist payment distribution - I've seen a couple of instances of people citing iTunes as providing more monetary compensation to artists since it is per download, rather than per play, among other things. This seems to be especially true for independent artists, and artists who are generally less well-known.
I was wondering if Spotify has ever considered doing payment distributions using the
sum[ (total artist streams per user) / (total streams per user) ] across all users
ratio for payment calculation, rather than the currently used
(total artist streams across Spotify) / (total streams across Spotify)
approach, i.e. calculating the artists' play ratio by user, rather than in one giant pool. If you have considered this, I would love to hear why the current payment implementation was chosen rather than a per user method, such as the one listed above. But...
If a per user method has not been considered by Spotify previously, I think it would be nice - while I'm not an analyst myself, I imagine that it could lead to more revenue for independent artists, and maybe even less famous artists that are still beholden to rights owners for distribution of payment. I think it would do this because it could account for differences in number of plays per user - rather than users who tend to play more music over the course of a month contributing more all artists' payout, each user has an equal voice in how money gets distributed to artists.
I understand that such a switch would be difficult, and possibly insurmountable in the instance of free users - so, I am positing this as an idea not for all users, but for Premium users only. With Premium, it is a feasible goal, since you have a finite number of plays, and a finite amount of money coming directly from that user, and do not have to worry about trying to calculate differences in advertisement impact for different users. Doing that ratio calculation would be relatively straightforward of a switch computationally (though quite a large change in the system nonetheless, of course).
I think this type of change would empower both users and artists to use Spotify more. Firstly, it would empower artists to allow Spotify to play their music because the metrics they would get per month would be more reflective of the size of their fan base, and how much importance that fan base puts on the artists' music than current metrics.
Secondly, it would empower users more, which I think is especially important for users between 18-32 years of age. While I am not an expert on the subject, I often find that users in this age group (my age group) care a great deal about having control over where their money ends up, which in this case means knowing which rights holders and/or artists are getting the money they are spending. I know I do. Switching to this system, while still not addressing the injustices that are felt within the relationship between rights holders and artists by many, would still allow users to have more of a say in who gets their money than the current system. On top of that, it might be helpfult for Spotify itself - if using Premium is the only way for users to feel empowered by knowing how their money is distributed, it may encourage people in the free tier to upgrade to Premium in order to feel empowered.
Just a thought. I'd love to hear what you and others have to say about this idea.

@Merik thanks for the warm welcome, and for the quick, informative response!
I had the chance to take a look at that page you linked to before my original post, and saw that paragraph you quoted, as well as the bullet point about paid users having a higher "per stream" rate. I guess what I was more interested in (and perhaps this is not the right place to ask this question?) was if there was more of an in-depth "why" behind their decision (and thanks again for linking to it!) documented anywhere that I might be able to read more about. Maybe I was missing something on that page (and please let me know if so!), but the only "why" that I could find was a sentence in the paragraph you quote above:
"We believe, however, that our service and the lives of artists will both be best if the World’s music fans enjoy more music than ever before in a legal, paid manner".
While it's great to see their opinion, I was more curious about the line of reasoning behind that position is all. Because I do wonder whether empowering premium users to have more fine-grained control over how their money is allocated, such as by doing pay "per user", might lead to both more paid users and more revenue for independent and/or lesser-known artists - and if that's something that Spotify has researched already, I would love to hear more about the pros and cons behind such an approach!
Thanks!

Is there any other way to achieve per user call forward restriction other than to create multiple voice policies?

Hello,
We mentioned the environment details below:
Environment
In our PBX environment, currently a user can forward calls to any local (within a region) internal extension. But for external PSTN call forwarding, a user needs to send a request and be approved by their manager. And the forwarding restriction
is applied such that user is only allowed to forward to that particular PSTN number - to prevent toll fraud.
Moving forward to Lync, using voice policy's call forwarding and simultaneous ring PSTN usages, I can set it to allow forward and simultaneous ring to custom PSTN usage and a custom route that will only send calls to these pre-approved
external numbers.
Outcome
But in such a scenario,
sSince all the custom external allowed numbers will have to be put into a single Route match table, User A will be able to successfully
set up call forward to User B's number. (if they come to know about it somehow, that is)
rü
Route matching list will be very long due to the number of users per hubsite that has call forwarding enabled.
Questions
Is there any other way to achieve per user call forward restriction other than to create multiple voice policies ? MSPL may be ?
2. Is there a limit in the number of entries you can have on the Route pattern matching regex expression ?
Please advise. MANY THANKS.

1) I think multiple policies may be your best bet, though it's not a fun one to manage, I agree. MSPL could do it, but it would be more complex to maintain in the end. Even gateways have limitations on routes.
2) I'm not aware of a limit, though I'm not saying there's isn't one. But if you hit it, you could move to a second usage/route combo.
I'd suggest building out some PowerShell usage/route creation/organization script for this so it's not something that would need to be maintained within the GUI.
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications
This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

URL links for Workflow Approval Email per user & others

Hi all, we have upgraded to SRM7 and understand that we have to switch to using program /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALSEND to generate the workflow notification emails. We have maintained the portal information in the SRM configuration to build the link. However, we have 2 issues here
1. We currently output collective email so emails are sent out at specific timing on a per user rather than per work item basis. The URL link does not seem to work in this case (for shopping cart approval example) and we get an object GUID error. The URL looks something like this
http://sap-ped.dev.xyz.com/irj/portal/?navigationtarget=obn://BOSystemAlias=SAP_SRM/BOTechnicalName=sc/Operation=detailprof&NavMode=3
Also, even if I run the program for a PO approval example, the BOTechnicalName is still pointing to sc.
However, if I do it on a per work item basis, the URL works.
Does anyone know where the control this setting?
2. External and internal portal
We have some users connecting to the portal through more secured channel (external portal). In this case, I couldn't find a way to generate the appropriate URL for the external. In the past in the older SRM version, the program was using the attribute ITS_DEST in PPOPMA_BBP to build the URL link. Now, I do not know how the system knows which portal URL to take if the control is no longer at user level.
Has anyone ever had this requirement before?
My worse case scenario to resolve the above issues would be to use the BADI to alter the content of the email notification. The purpose of posting this message here is to ensure that I am not missing out any standard SAP functionality which could meet our requirements.
Cheers!
SF

Hello,
See hyper-links below:
[How-To: Offline approval - Logon link does not work|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/Offlineapproval-Logonlinkdoesnot+work]
[KBA 1511180 - The hyperlink in the offline approval email is incorrect|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1511180]
Regards.
Laurent.

An OS-Intergrated place to store per-user application configuration files.

A Chairde,
I'm developing an application that could be deployed on multiple platforms. I'm looking for a location to store per-user configuration files in a OS-integrated way.
I use a utility class to determine the OS of the users machine. I know from experience that Windows NT5+ likes to store per-user settings/configurations in the %APPDATA% path (which is usually C:\Users\<username>\Appdata\Roaming\<vendor>\<software> etc.) I'm using a call to the environment labels to determine it's location.
I'm a linux user myself, so I'm aware that most UNIX based Operating Systems like to store personal configurations in hidden folders in the user's home directory (ex /home/<username>/.<application> etc.), Obviously, I'm using a call to the system property user.home to determine that location.
My Question is in relation to Mac OS and Mac OS X, where would it be a safe location to store per-user configurations? I know OS X is BSD/UNIX based so is it safe to assume to store them as a hidden subfolder of the user.home directory? What about Mac OS classic? Where are per-user settings stored, or is it like Windows 9x and NT4 and lacks proper multi-user setups (although NT4 is somewhat more prepared then 9x) ?
It would be much appreciated if anybody has any ideas.
Is Mise,
Seán Mac Aodha
PS. I'm not using Javas Property files etc. I've rolled my own exchangeable format for storing key,value pairs.

I've used databases in the past to store local files but clients have sometimes run into trouble when the database daemon goes down or doesnt start-up normally because of a "improper" shutdown etc.
In my own implementation of "Settings Files" i have serialized hashtables marked with appropriate metadata stored to the users "application data", a backup or original copy of those settings in the common directory shared by my application framework and then in a networked enviroment, the Settings can be hosted on a database server, so the user can travel between client machines and keep their settings (and files) with them.
I have, with a bit of googling, come across the most obvious page i should have looked at in regards to Apple Mac OS X
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFileSystem/Articles/WhereToPutFiles.html
According to Apple's guidlines, the most suitable place to store User configuration files is in the ~/Library/Application Support/<Application Name> directory.
and for System-wide configuration files, /Library/Application Support/<Application Name> rather then storing them with the application in the /Applications directory.

Clustered WL 6.1 creates 2 server sessions per user

          It appears that WL 6.1 creates 2 HTTP sessions per user for a simple JSP object.
          It shows in "ADmin Console/mydomain> DefaultWebApp> Web Applications> DefaultWebApp>
          Servlet Runtimes":
          1 /count.jsp
          1 /*.jsp
          In a non-clustered environment this does not happen.
          Is that normal?


I found the problem myself. For some reason WL did not like any special characters in the system password. I am not sure which ones are valid and which are not but I am avoiding them all right now.

System session variable USER

Hi,
i have setup-ed the action links and used the USER variable for the EBS secuirty context init block as this
EBS_RESP_ID
EBS_RESP_APPL_ID
EBS_SEC_GROUP_ID
EBS_RESP_NAME
EBS_USER_ID
EBS_EMPLOYEE_ID
USER
Now for the sso configuration in the RPD i need to use the USER variable again as per the document (section A.1.1 )http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/bi.1111/e10543/legacy.htm#BABFJEJF
"To set up LDAP authentication:
Create an LDAP Server as follows:
Select Manage then Identity in the Oracle BI Administration Tool to launch the Security Manager.
Select Directory Servers from the left pane in Security Manager.
Right-click in the right pane in Security Manager and select New LDAP Server. The LDAP Server dialog is displayed.
Create the LDAP server by completing the fields.
Create an LDAP initialization block and associate it with an LDAP server. For more information. see "Creating Initialization Blocks" in Oracle Fusion Middleware Metadata Repository Builder's Guide for Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition.
Define a system variable named *USER* and map the USER variable to an LDAP attribute (uid or sAMAccountName)."
So how can i use the same user variable and assign it to LDAP init block as well the EBS security context init block.
can you provide your valuable inputs here.

Referencing GROUP session variable in initialization blocks for different types of authentication
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/10/referencing-group-session-variable-in.html
Users are assigned to multiple groups from external table with semicolons, see example two and three from the post.
Regards
Goran
http://108obiee.blogspot.com

Currency display format as per user settings?

Dear Friends,
I need a help.
I am printing currency grand total amount in my report.
the default format setting is like : 1,234,567.89
if user changes is format settings (going into system, user profile, own data, default) 1.234.567,89 then it should print in this format.
what i mean report grand total should come as per user display settings.
how to solve this?
Thanks in advanvce
Sridhar.

hi sreedhar,
data: c(100) type c.
data: l_amnt(100) type c.
data: length type i.
data: offset type i.
l_amnt = '1,234,567.89'.
replace all occurrences of ',' in l_amnt with '#'.
replace all occurrences of '.' in l_amnt with ','.
replace all occurrences of '#' in l_amnt with '.'.
length = strlen( l_amnt ).
offset = length - 3.
translate c+offset(1) using '.,'.
write : l_amnt.
rgds
anver
if hlped mark points

System usage per user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for