T.c FF7B: planning levels for Logistics

Hi All,
With reference to the Report FF7B and the CM data from Logistics,
I've defined the planning levels for logistics and the others steps under the CASH MANAGEMENT menù of SPRO.
But the report FF7A doesn't prodide me the logistic data... are there other customizing steps out of the CASH MANAGEMENT menù of SPRO.
Thanks

Hi,
If you have done the config as mentioned by Kalyan, i.e. define planning groups, assign/link them to planning levels and assign the appropriate planning level in customer/vendor master data either you run FF7B (for liquidity forecast) or even you can run FF7A, but need to tick the check box for liquidity forecast.
thanks,
Kumar

Similar Messages

Define Planning levels for Logistics (Liquidity forecast).

Hi Gurus,
I am defining planning levels for logistics for my client inorder to see the purchase order items in liquidity forecast report FF7A/FF7B but I can only assign one vendor planning group to M2 as my requirement requires all vendor planning groups to be assigned to M2 to see all the purchase orders items for all the vendor planning groups. Does anybody has any idea how do we assign?
Thanks,
Bob

Hi Nirmal,
I think that is for displaying per cash management group but thanks nirmal for replying.
Regards,
Bob

Select planning level for forecast caluculation manually

Dear all,
In S&OP on HANA we would like to run the forecast on a more aggregated level than the base planning level.
The base planning level in the input/output key figure of the forecast profile is supposed to be lower than the level which should be used for forecast calculation. If the filter in the forecast profile menu is set to the higher level, the forecast is still calculated on the base planning level and aggregated according to the settings in the key figures.
Is it possible to manually define the planning level the statistical forecast is supposed to be run on?
Thank you in advance!
Jamie

Hi Nikhita
There is a transaction " define planning levels for logistic". In this step you allocate transaction from MM and SD to the planning levels you ahve defined. this allocation is neccessary since the system cannot determine planning level by using master record fields as it does to access data from FI.
In FI planning level for G/L is specified in G/L master. However a business transaction in logistics is represented by an Internal ID
1 = PR
2 = PO
3 = Scheduling agreement
you must assign these transactions to a plannning level in CM
T-code :- Financial Supply Chain Management> Cash and Liquidity Management>Cash Management>Structuring>Define planning levels for Logistics
Please let me know if you ahve done this setting. Would advise you to revisit your config for INT code - level- Planning group.
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you still cant get around.
Thanks
Sanjeev

Selecting the Planning Level for Statistical Forecast in S&OP on HANA

Hello together,
we currently face an issue regarding the statistical forecast in S&OP on HANA:
The customer wants to implement an S&OP process containing the two steps statistical forecast (automatically calculated) and sales forecast (manually determined). The planning level of the statistical forecast should be higher than the planning level of the sales forecast, i.e. the statistical forecast is calculated on a higher planning level and then disaggregated to be an input for the manually determined sales forecast.
Since it doesn't seem to be possible to disaggregate any key figure below its base planning level we need to have the lower sales planning level as base planning level in all key figures, including the input and output key figures of the statistical forecast.
When running a statistical forecast with a defined forecasting profile, the planning level used for the forecast seems to be the base planning level of the input/output key figures defined in the forecasting profile.
However, we need to define a higher planning level for the statistical forecast in order to have a better data base for recognizing trends and sesonality. In APO DP it is possible to define the planning level for the forecast when running/scheduling the forecasting job. Is this also possible in S&OP on HANA? Can we define the planning level for the forecast in the forecasting profile or when running the forecast from the Excel AddIn? I tried to use the field "Filter" in the forecasting profile as it listed all the planning levels (as well as a lot of other things, we don't know where they come from), but the forecast was still carried out on the base planning level.
Do you have any other idea where to define the forecasting planning level that is different from the base planning level of the input/output key figures?
Thank you in advance,
Jonathan

Hi Bert,
thank you for your fast answer. I checked the forum again and found this post:
Question about Statistical Forecast
However, I don't really get how the disaggregation is meant to work; the suggestion seems to be to calculate a forecast on an aggregated level, i.e. with input and output key figure with an aggregated base planning level, and then disaggregate it "somehow".
Do you have any idea how this disaggregation might work and what other steps I have to consider?
It seems as if I'd have to define a whole bunch of new key figures and have more than one output key figure but no input key figure for the statistical forecast, which doesn't make sense in my eyes.
Actually I was looking for a solution where I can define my forecasting profile with both input and output key figure on the lower planning level and then insert the level I want the forecast to be done at either in the profile as well, or even more flexible when running or scheduling a forecast. Defining more key figures any time I need another forecasting level does not appear very comfortable. Is it meant to be like that or is there another way to reach the goal mentioned above?
Cheers,
Jonathan
Edit: The mentioned thread contains some valuable information on how to disaggregate key figures. However, the really tricky decision is how to define the disaggregation ratio.

Planning level - Liquidity forecast

I have done settings for liquidity forecast. I have created planning levels, planning groups, source symbols etc. From MM, I have included PR, PO, Sch Agreements, etc. I have posted few PRs and POs and Vendor Masters are asigned cash management groups also. However, while simulating the Liquidity Forecast report, system does not show PRs or POs which are posted and released. But I can see the vendor balances posted in FI books.
Have I missed any setting ?

Hi Nikhita
There is a transaction " define planning levels for logistic". In this step you allocate transaction from MM and SD to the planning levels you ahve defined. this allocation is neccessary since the system cannot determine planning level by using master record fields as it does to access data from FI.
In FI planning level for G/L is specified in G/L master. However a business transaction in logistics is represented by an Internal ID
1 = PR
2 = PO
3 = Scheduling agreement
you must assign these transactions to a plannning level in CM
T-code :- Financial Supply Chain Management> Cash and Liquidity Management>Cash Management>Structuring>Define planning levels for Logistics
Please let me know if you ahve done this setting. Would advise you to revisit your config for INT code - level- Planning group.
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you still cant get around.
Thanks
Sanjeev

Cash Management Report FF7B - drill-down from planning levels to AP/AR OIs

Hi
I'm configuring cash management and have created all planning levels and groups needed.
All master data, ie GL accounts, vendors and customers, have the correct planning level or group.
I've created all the groupings etc that I need.
I'm running the reports FF7A and FF7B. I have two questions and problems.
1. When running the Liquidity Forecsat for customers and vendors I drill-down to the standard PL or SL planning levels for AP and AR postings respectively. Then I drill into the planning groups correctly (E1-E9 and R1-R8). But when I try to drill into the cash management detail records (or is it the AP/AR line items?) I get "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data". This happens every time. Should I now see the AP or AP line items? Or should I see some cash management memo records? I have deleted all the cash management data several times and recreated but I still get this problem (using reports RFFDDL00 and RFFDKU00)
When I do the same for purchase orders, purchase requisitions or sales orders I see a Memo Records List which agrees with the previous planning level total and I can then drill into the actiual POs, PRs or SOs from this list without an issue.
2. When running the Cash Position and I do the drill-down to the GL Line Items, I get an enormous list which does not just show the total of items at the previous planning level. Why is this please? Example: a bank account with a balance of £2,000 (shown on the panning level) but with 000's of line items totalling say £5m. Again I have deleted the CM data and recreated but without any improvement to the problem.
Any help anyone can give me with these issues will be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Wayne

Hi
I have the same trouble with Tcode FF7B. There´s a message "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data"; bit in the TcodeFF7A, it runs OK. The message appears just witn Tcode FF7A.
Also, There´s all TR data in tables FDSB for GL accounts, FDSR and FDFIEP for customers/vendors.
Can you help me?? can you solved this issue?
Tanks for your Help

How to make authorization to different planning level on one planning area?

now the situation is one planning area call one global company, under that we create several planning level for serveral sub-company. The authorization should that one sub-comp. only can display, change his planning level, and can not display any other sub-comp. So, in this case how to make authorization? Thanks!

I didn't create an authorization variable on sub-comp. pls, let me know how to create an authorization variable on sub-comp, and the info for the next steps. thanks!

Billing plan (Downpayment) for saved and open sales orders at header level?

Hi gurus,
I have configured billing plan in my SD environment at Item Level.
I want to change it to header level.
Questions:
1- When I make the changes to update the system to have billing plan at header level for future sales orders, is that possible for me to change all my saved orders and open orders with the new settings so that I can also have those saved and open orders with a billing plan at item level?
2- If that scenario is not possible, could we for example copy the data of a previously saved or open sales order into a new sales order with the new customizing (Billing plan at Header level?)
Thanks for your input
Kind regards
Chris

Hi
I am afraid you cannot do that converstion for the existing orders. BP at header level are enabled at teh document type level, while BP at item level is done at item category. So both are independent. Mostly it is advisabel to use BP at item level only.
If you are already using item level BP, and want to mvoe to header BP, then only future transactions can be executed with BP at header level. Existing item level BPlans will remain so in the system.

Setting # for 0CALYEAR in selection for planning level in BPS

hi all!
when i try to set # for 0CALYEAR (and other time variables) in selection for planning level in BPS, i recieve the following error message: 'Value # is not permitted for characteristic Calendar Year' (UPC003). As i understand, this problem began to occur after upgrading to SPS12.
we have BI 7.0 installed
can anyone help me solve this problem please?


Hi 
Check in year master data if value BLANK (#) exists. System should permit only those values for characteristics which are available in master data tables. 
Secondly, does system allow you to select value # for calendar year using the F4 drilldown?
 
Hope it helps. 
Cheers Abhijit
Please assign Reward Points if I above information was useful

2 variables for same characteristic in planning level in BPS

Hello,
I would appreciate your help implementing this scenario: a user has access to certain versions and should be a able to copy data between 2 of those versions.
We have 4 versions on our master data: 001, 002, 003 and 004.
A certain user should be able to access versions 001, 002 and 003, and should not be able to access version 004.
So we have an authorization object applied to that user with:
-> 0TCAACTVT EQ 03
-> 0TCAIPROV EQ <real time infocube>
-> 0TCAVALID CP *
-> 0VERSION EQ 001, 002 and 003
Then, users should be able to copy data between versions.
We created 2 variables on planning area, named ZVERSOLD and ZVERSNEW, with these characteristics:
-> Characteristic: 0VERSION
-> Replacement Type: USERVALUE User-defined values
-> Restriction of Values Required by User: enabled
-> Input Allowed by User: enabled
So this particular user should only see those 3 versions when pressing F4 when filing both variables.
After that, we created the planning level with the u201Ccopyu201D planning function.
But now, on planning level, we need to restrict 0VERSION, but we have a problem because we are not able to restrict it using 2 variables (ZVERSOLD and ZVERSNEW). Only one.
If we donu2019t use any variable, user gets an authorization error because he is not able to access to all data due to authorizations.
Does anyone have a way to avoid this issue? Should authorizations be defined in a different way? Should variables be defined in a different way?
Hopefully I exposed all required details to get help, and that my question wasnu2019t too much confused.
Again, thank you very much in advance for your support.
Rui

Hello,
If you restrict the VERSION with variable ZVERSNEW for target version then the function should work. But if you get any error related to reading reference data for the source version then you can create a new variable of type exit and populate it with the values selected by the user in two variables ZVERSOLD and ZVERSNEW using the two APIs :
API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_GETDETAIL - to get the current value of the two Variables
API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_SET - to set the Variable Values for the Exit type variable
Regards,
Deepti

ABAP Function for renaming of a planning level?

Hi all,
i wanna know if does exist an ABAP Function for renaming of a planning level or parameter group.
Someone can help me please?
Thanx a lot,
Paolo.


Hi,
I don't think any such Function Module exists. Nonetheless I can give you a good hint.
All the details of all planning objects (Planning Areas, Planning Levels, Planning Functions. Parameter Groups etc) are stored in UP* Tables. Just go to T-code SE11 and search for tables with name UP*.
Once you know the tables, you can write your own customized ABAP code.
PS: I can recommend above method to just read the details of Planning Objects. I don't think you should be ambitious to change planning object names by attempting to change system table contents. Hope you are getting me.
Regards,
Abhijit

COPA-KE3I, Tranasport for Planning Level

Dear All,
When i am using Transaction Code KE3I to create a transport Request for transporting Planning Levels, i am being prompted with a Work Bench Request and a Customizing request. Can you please explain the significance of the Work Becnh Request here(since in the T Code SE09 i find all the Planning Levels i intended to transport under Customising Request and the Work Bench Request seems to be empty).Should both these requests be transported ? Can you also guide me in the sequence of releasing them.
Best Regards
COTINYFEET

Dear Ajay ,
It seems i have no other option but to use KE3I in my Project. Now if i am using KE3I, and i have got two Reuests a) Workbench Request( this does not contain any Data when i see using SE09) b) Customizing Request(all the Planning Levels that are intended to be transported are there in this , used SE09 to view here).
These are my Questions
1) Should i Release both the Request. If so what is the sequence?
2) What are the consequences if i dont release Workbench Request(since it contains no objects to be transported) and release only Customizng Request?
3) Why should there be a Workbench Request Created here(KE3I), when i dont get it in KEPM(here only Customizing Request Is Created when i transport Planning Levels)
Could you please shed some light into my queries.
Best Regards
COTINYFEET

Planned SP level for the ABAP stack

Hi,
What is the planned SP level for the ABAP stack (WAS 6.40 for Windows)?
I'm just wondering if we'll get 'Webdynpro for ABAP' or it will be already deleted via SP?
Thanks,
Peter
Ps: When it will be available?....it's 'Coming soon!' for quite some time:-(

Based on http://www.sap.com/minisap :
The SAP Netweaver Sneak Preview ABAP Edition from SDN (NW04 SP11) is released with the system ID NSP.

MTO - how to prevent a second planned order for a sales order?

Dear friends,
We are working on Make to Order process (Planning strategy group 20).
No Production/process order is used
Shop floor uses a different system --> details from planned order is passed to the shop floor system; and finished product is delivered/posted into SAP Sales order stock - through interfaces
No QM in place
A typical day-to-day scenario
Sales order Qty = 100
MRP Run à Planned order qty = 100
Raw materials posted to Sales order stock
Planned order is firmed
For example if Produced qty = 90
sales order stock of the finished product = 90
Balance 10 cannot be produced / delivered for various reasons
Planner posts the raw material to cost center / rejections / own stock etc., and ensures that the sales order stock of the raw materials are zero.
Planner deletes the planned order
Next MRP run triggers a new planned order for the balance qty 10
Now, the requirement is to prevent the new planned order getting generated for the balance quantity, during the subsequent MRP run (despite the shortage in the Sales order stock of the finished product).
The following options have been evaluated
Once the final good receipt is done & before deleting the planned order,
o       Change the Sales order quantity to match the total produced quantity
o       (or) Change the schedule line category for the Sales order item from CP to CN
§         Since the Sales order and planned order are handled by different teams, considering the frequency of correspondence/coordination needed between these two teams to get the sales order items corrected, this idea is not accepted
§         Additional authorization for the planner to change the sales order item is not acceptable
Include Under delivery / Unlimited tolerances
o       at the customer (master) level
o       (or) Sales order level
§         In this case, System seems to consider the tolerances only when the delivery for the Sales order is posted; and not when the sales order stock is received within the tolerance limits;
§         Considering the time gap between the GR and Delivery of the finished product, this option is not accepted
Kindly suggest the other options / settings / processes, to meet this requirement
Thank you for your time and efforts.
With Best Regards,
Senthil

Closing this thread
Thanks
Senthil

Creation of new planning level in BPS0 in BW 3.5

Dear Experts,
I have to create a new planning layout in BW 3.5 BPS
for this ,I have followed the below procedure:
-Maintained the master data of new keyfigures in Info Object: Key Figure (0MEASURE) in RSA1
-Copied the Similar Planning level in the same Planning area (in which I need to add the new one) and created a new planning level with its subordinate objects and then changed by deleting the keyfigures except # and added the new keyfigures, to be maintained in new planning area and saved.
-Changed the planning layout (which is created automatiacally whne we copied planning level) by deleting the existing key figures except 0KEYFG_FLAG and added the required key figure and saved.
-copied the planning profile and created a new planning profile and changed it with required planning level and package and saved.
-In T-code:upx_mntn1, I could see the new planning level with the required key figure there.
But this new planning profile is not appraring in the CRM server.
As I haven't worked in BPS , please guide me if there is any thing needs to be done or any changes in the procedure followed.
Please share any documentation or links you have ....regarding this
Please share your Ideas
Thanks in advance....
Arjun

Hi,
The Planning Profile has been created in CRM also and hence the configuration is working

T.c FF7B: planning levels for Logistics

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for