T Code for Code Inspector in 4.6c

Hi,
Please tell me what is the T Code for Code Inspector in 4.6 C..

In 4.6c SCI is not available , For getting that you need to reimport using the sap note 543359
a®

Similar Messages

Code Inspector - Naming conventions &mExtended Naming conventions for Progs

Hi experts,
I had a look into the naming conventions enforced by 'DEFAULT' variant of code inspector (SCI).
the relevant categories are: "Naming Conventions", and "Extended Naming conventions for Programs" under "Programing conventions".
in the "Extended Naming conventions for Programs" category, for functions, (applicable while calling the functions) it says,
importing parameter : I[:type:]_
exporting parameter : E[:type:]_
changing parameter : C[:type:]_
tables parameter : T[:type:]_
but in the "naming conventions" category, for functions (applicable while defining the functions), it says,
importing parameter : P_*
exporting parameter : P_*
changing parameter : P_*
tables parameter : P_*
I felt, while defining the function too, its better to have beginning with I_, E_, C_ or T_ instead of P_
is the 'DEFAULT' variant of code inspector is provided and recommended by SAP?
for easier maintenance and clearer understanding, which naming convention is more suitable, or is there any official guidelines released by SAP for ABAP developers.
appreciate the opinions from experienced abap developers.
thanks,
Madhu_1980

Frank,
Thanks for your answer.
But what about Entity Objects, View Objects, View Links, and Application Modules.
I would like my developers to have an easy way to name them and also find them via intellisense.
So I was thinking in naming them the following way :
Entity Objects :
EO_Employee
EO_Department
View Objects :
VO_Employees
VO_Departments
View Links :
VL_EmployeesToDepartments
Application Module :
AM_HRService
However the use of "_" is not so "Java naming oriented".
So other alternatives would be:
1. take the "_" :
1.1 EOEmployee (I don't like the fact of having 3 capital letters together).
1.2 EoEmployee (I don't like the fact of having Entity Object with a lowercase "o").
2. Use the prefix at the end, but this way I loose the intellisense feature I want:
ex: EmployeeEO
Which naming approach are you using for big projects ?
Thanks,
Claudio.

Code Inspector for Module program

Dear all,
in release time, this error is detected by code inspector..............................I/O field (output field) ZZWERKS1 has no accessible label........................how can i hide it.
actually for this no pseodo code is available.

No, Suppose i have created one Module pool.
When i m going to use code Inspector for that one error is occured......................ZZWERKS1 has no accessible label.
Actually for Plant i have created only input field without Label as per requirement.
Now my question is that how i can hide this error message.

Code Inspector/ATC checks for VKOS/VKOI object types

Dear Experts,
I found a strange behavior while executing CI checks on a transport request. TR contained only IMG Activity objects (Object Type VKOS/VKOI). After CI checks it gave errors "Recognized dead code". There is no coding for these kind of object type, I don't know where it was able to find the dead code. On debugging I found that, it is trying to populate Program name concatenatinv " SAPIC " and the object type. ( SAPICVKO). But there is no such program existing. It then gives "Recognized dead code" error.
Has anyone faced such error before? I guess this is error in the standard program.
Thank you.

Other language NUnit test frameworks similar to ABAP Unit (AUnit) commonly have project extensions for storing test results. These are useful for the unit level regression (did a new change break any existing functions). History of test results, help narrow down the nature of a current failure by answering the question of 'When did this break?' or when did it last pass? In systems dependent upon outside components the history can provide a pattern for occasional failures due to factors outside the system under test.
I see that ABAP unit test results can be added into the Code Inspector under the Check Variant.
1. Is it common or recomended to use the Code Inspector (SCI) to store AUnit test results?
2. Is it common or recomended to use Code Inspector Object variants to collect individual AUnit tests for a regresssion style 'TestSuite'?
3. What reporting or tools exists for Code Inspector history?
4. Is Application Logging the better spot for AUnit results history?
(also posted on the wiki.. apologies - I'm new to the forum and wiki)
Will Loew-Blosser

Code Inspector for 4.6b version

Hi all,
I need to use something like Code Inspector in a R/3 version 4.6b. Does anyone know what can be used instead of Code Inspector (it seems that it is impossible to install SCI on 4.6b)?
Please, help.
Thanks!
Patricia

Hi Patricia!
This release is far to old for the modern tools. You might install (locally) a NetWeaver preview version, copy your soucecode and run the test on this preview release. But you need also all the dictionary objects...
But an extended program check, running with all options active, gives already about 50% of the code inspector results. In addition some select statement checks are done - but with a careful check, this is manually possible, too.
Regards,
Christian

Customizing the code inspector with check for two executable statements in same line

Hi Everyone,
I have a reuirement to customize the code inspector.I need to create a check 'Two executable statements should not be in the same line'.
While doing so i am facing one problem as in internal table it is capturing the report as word by word with same row number nd different line number.
If anyone have worked on this before then help me out.
I am using CL_CI_TEST_SCAN as superclass and making the changes in the run method.
Regards,
Khushboo

In the source code you will have this in comment right, use the "#EC ENHOK.

How to create and transport my own globel check variant for Code Inspector

Hi,
I want to create my own global check variant with Code Inspector, so that I can transport the Variant in other systems, but I can not save my variant whitout registering a SSCR-Key.
Can anybody help me?
Best regards
Marcus

I have solved it myself and will post the solution here soon.

Select query gives error in Code inspector and extended program check

Hi,
I have a query .
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE endda EQ c_date AND
z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
This query gives me an error in Code inspector like :
Large table pa0001: No first field of table index in WHERE condition
I have one more query that gives error in extended program check
SELECT SINGLE stell ename
      INTO (g_stell, g_name)
      FROM pa0001
      WHERE pernr EQ wa_nca_tab-pernr AND
            endda EQ c_date.
The warning says:
*In "SELECT SINGLE ...", the WHERE condition for the key field "SEQNR" does not
test for equality. Therefore, the single record in question may not be unique.*
Its too urgent.
Please reply.
Regards,
Binay.

The first field is PERNR .. so if UR not giving pernr it will fetch
all the data from the said table and between the given dates ..
Check if this is your requirement ...
write the select as ...
where r_pernr is a range ...
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE pernr in r_pernr <----
             endda EQ c_date AND
             z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
As UR using select single it's expecting to use all the key
fields in the where condition ...
U can ignore this warning message

Execute ABAP Code Inspector from Outside of SAP

Hi all...
For reporting purpose, I would like to use ABAP Code Inspector (transaction SCI) for generating output as a file, it should call from outside of SAP through RFC function module and generate the list (output) as flat file (or XML), does anyone have been done with similar work like this? I wonder if you could share your experience with me...
thanks in advance,
yayan irianto.

I managed to set up the variant, however found a problem.
I used "Search ABAP Statement Patterns" under "Search Functs" and set the pattern like followings.
SELECT + INTO *
SELECT SINGLE + INTO *
However following statements were detected.
SELECT * INTO TABLE IT_DRAW FROM DRAW.
SELECT MANDT INTO TABLE IT_DRAW FROM DRAW.
SELECT SINGLE * INTO TABLE IT_DRAW FROM DRAW.
SELECT SINGLE MANDT INTO TABLE IT_DRAW FROM DRAW.
It's because + means one ABAP token in the code inspector.
Is there anyway to find only "SELECT SINGLE *" and "SELECT *" ?

Error in code inspector

Hi Abapers,
I have done recording for Tcode:pa30 in my report and used call transaction method. because of this i'm getting one error in when i check code inspector.
error message:
CA CL_CI_TEST_CRITICAL_STATEMENTS0002
Critical Statements
Call of Transaction &1
&1 = Name of Transaction
For CALL TRANSACTION there must already be a suitable transaction authorization with the calling transaction.
Kindly help me out to fix this error.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Goto SE24
enter this class CL_CI_TEST_CRITICAL_STATEMENTS
and see its documentation.
It shows the all critical errors that are there in code.
Regards
Anji

Code Inspector Checks

Hi All,
I am doing Code Inspector Check for my Program.
Doing this, I am getting an Error Message Indicating to use TYPE TABLE OF instead of OCCURS 0 statement while declaring Internal Tables.
Question is, Is there any difference between TYPE TABLE OF and OCCURS 0 (Performance wise) ?
Helpful answers will be rewarder by points.
Thanks & Regards
Swatantra Pathak

HI,
Yes.
OCCURS 0 is obsolete now.
When we define internal table with OCCURS 0 it will allocate a default memory of 8KB. In TYPE TABLE/STANDARD TABLE OF it is dynamic i.e as and when we get a record memory will be allocated.
eg: If ur itab is with OCCURS 0 and u have data of size 2kb then 6KB memory is wasted i.e allocated and not used.
eg2: If ur itab is with OCCURS 0 , Each record accupies 1 KB. Then after filling 8 records and at the time of getting 9 th records another 8KB is allocated. If u have 9 records in ur table then 7KB is wasted.
If u r getting allocated with some memory(Resource) and not using means performancewise it is bad.
Hope above examples are clear.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Differences between SLIN and Code Inspector

Hi,
Can anyone tell me the differences between SLIN and Code Inspector(SCI)..?
and in which cases we use SLIN and SCI..?
and as an ABAPer, which one should we prefer..?
Thanks,
Pradeep.

Hi
Extended syntax check or SLIN is used to check the program in all aspects for the different syntaxes like
When you use select single whether you have passed all the key fields or not>
whether you have maintained the text elements texts or not,
Have you used UNIT...CURRENCY along with the QTY and AMOUNT fields when displayed using the WRITE statement
and check for all the varities of statements used in the code, and if there is some problem with that statement/command, it will display as error or warning.
Check following links -
slin
can any one tell me abt SLIN T-CODE
Reward points if useful
Regards
Anji

Code Inspector Selection

Hello,
I am trying to use the Code Inspector and I would like to check only specific Includes from a Function Group.
In my Object Set I specified the Function Group I wanted to scan (Tab Classes, Function Groups, etc.) and I specified the Include I wanted to specially verify in the Program Tab.
It takes a lot of time to run and I get a runtime error. I have about 10 Includes to check so it should not take that long.
Is there a way to combine 2 different selections in the standard selection fields without considering modifying the source code?
I've checked the Code Inspector documentation but did not really find something that could help me solve my problem.
Does anyone have a solution?
Thanks in advance.
Sylvain

Hi guys,
Thanks for the answers but it's not solving my problem.
Here is an example of the situation I am going through:
The SAP standard program SAPLYDEVCM contains a lot of standard Includes and some new Customer specific Includes that were added during the project.
I want to scan only the Customer Includes Y* and Z*. When I enter the specific Include names the Code Inspector scan all Includes of the main program SAPLYDEVCM and that is not what I want.
Is it possible to scan only the Customer Specific Includes?
I hope my example was clear enough.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Sylvain

Code Inspector Showing Error!!!

Hi All,
How to correct the following error raised by Code Inspector Check!!!!
ProgramZFTSRPRECC Include ZFTSRPRECC Row 1 Column 0
The namespace of the programZFTSRPRECC has the setting "C" and cannot be
tested
A possible cause for this is that an SAP program is being checked in a customer
system
Note, the following rule applies after a change in the sourcecode:
For testing the namespace settingis ignored for one week.
regards,
naveen.....

Check the attributes of the program, whether u may be selected "C" in Application option, if yes change to something else and test.
Pls get back with the result.

How to remove Unicode errors from extended check and code inspector

Hi
We are working on making all our ABAP program to make unicode compliant. We are activating unicode flag in attribute and correcting syntax errors. After this when we do the extended checks or SLIN or code inspector, usually giving error for many statements such as whenever there is message.
<b>Code is :</b>message a208 with text-004.
<b>Error description is</b> :
The message 208 for id zz has no long text.
You can hide this message using "#EC *
208 is - & does not exist in & &. And text 004 is - Cannot open the output file
By using #EC * we can remove errors. But Is this the correct way and what does this indicate? Please explain.

Hi Yogesh,
Can you check whether the message number 208 in message id ZZ has the Self Explanatory checkbox as checked or not? I think it is not checked and u have also not maintained any long text. Hence the error.
By using #EC - you do not remove the error, however u hide it from SLIN.
It is used if there is some known error you cannot avoid which is returned by SLIN and you dont want it to be reported. Also, a way to "cheat" the reviewer who might be checking for errors.
Not good !!
Regards,
Aditya

T Code for Code Inspector in 4.6c

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for