T2000 -Solaris 10 -  Hardware Raid - Hot Spare

Hi,
i am setting up a t2000 server with Solaris 10. I have booted to single user mode through the network and am setting up the mirroring. (ie #raidctl -c c0t0d0 c0t1d0).
This has worked fine.
How does one go about setting up a disk to be a hot spare to this mirror. I found some docs on running raidctl -a set -g c0t3d0 c0t0d0 but the -a option no longer seems to be valid????
Is it possible to set up a hot spare like this?
Thanks,
Darren

The hardware raid supports either mirrors or stripes. I don't believe hot spare is an option. Typically you would use a hot spare for a raid 5 configuration. Check out this doc page for more info:
http://docs.sun.com/source/819-7990-10/ontario-volume_man.html#pgfId-1000514

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 10 X86 - Hardware RAID - SMC/SVM question...

    I have gotten back into Sun Solaris System Administration after a five year hiatus... My skills are a little rusty and some of the tools have changed, so here is are my questions...
    I have installed Solaris 10 release 1/06 on a Dell 1850 with an attached PowrVault 220v connected to a Perc 4 Di controller. The RAID is configured via BIOS interface to my liking, Solaris is installed and see's all my partitions which I created during install.
    For testing purposes, the servers internal disk is used for the OS, the PowerVault is split into 2 RAID's - one is a mirror, one is a stripe...
    The question is; do I manage the RAID using Sun Management Console and the tools OR do I use SMC?
    When I launch SMC and go into Enhanced Storage... I do not see any RAID's... If I select "Disks" I do see them, but when I select them, it wants to run "FDISK" on them... now this is OK since they are blank but I want to ensure I am not doing sometinhg I should not be concerned with...
    If the PERC controller is controlling the RAID, what do I need SMC for?

    You can use SMC for other purposes but it won't help your with RAID.
    Sol 10 1/06 has raidctl which handles LSI1030 and LSI1064 RAID�enabled controllers (from raidctl(1M)).
    Some of the PERCs (most?) are LSI but I don't know if they are chipsets used by your PoweEdge (I doubt it).
    Generally you can break it down like this for x86:
    If you are using hardware RAID with Solaris 10 x86 you have to use pre-Solaris (i.e. on the RAID controller) managment or hope that the manufacturer of the device has a Solaris managment agent/interface (good luck).
    The only exception to this that I know of is the RAID that comes with V20z, V40z, X4100, X4200.
    Otherwise you will want to go with SVM or VxVM and manage RAID within Solaris (software RAID).
    SMC etc are only going to show you stuff if SVM is involved and VxVM has its own interface, otherwise the disks are controlled by PERC and just hanging out as far as Solaris is concerned.
    Hope this helps.

  • Replace the Hot Spare that Shared between Raid 1 and raid 5

    I have ProLiant ML370 G6  with Smart Array P410i Controller on System Board 
    I have two Logical Drive (Logical Drive 1 - Mirroring (RAID 1) And (Logical Drive 2 - Distributed Data Guarding (RAID 5)
    The logical Drive 1- Mirroring (RAID 1) Have two Physical Drives 
    The Logical Drive 2 Distributed Data Guarding (RAID 5 Have three Physical Drives
    And There Are One Spare Drive Shared btween RAID 1 and Raid 5 
    Controller Configuration Summary
    2 Data Array(s)
    2 Data Logical Drive(s)
    5 Data Drive(s)
    1 Spare Drive(s)
    The problem :
    there are that the spare Drive FAil and have warining To replace it 
    I  replace this drive with new one but the repulid for the Drive not start and Give Inactive 
    How Repulid the Hot Spare drive  ?

    Hello Amostafa,
    Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
    I understand that you are looking to rebuild the hot spare drive on your ProLiant system, and I would be happy to guide you towards a resolution!
    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure, I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums, since this is a commercial product. You can do this at:   
    http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/ProLiant-Servers-ML-DL-SL/bd-p/itrc-264
    I hope this helps!
    Regards
    MechPilot
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Raid- Understanding "Hot Spare" and Windows reinstall - Final Steps

    Hello all,
    If you follow couple of my other recent threads here you will see I have a warning of a failing drive in my 4 tb raid (4 x 1TB raid set.)
    Also for an unrelated reason I am also needing to reinstall Windows 7.  (and of course my Adobe Master collection CS5)
    I ordered a 5th drive to serve as "Hot Spare" and it will be arriving sometime today from Amazon.
    I want to make sure I do the above "final steps" properly, in the correct order.
    I am basing my "final steps" based on Harm's advice on another thread:
    >>>
    You can never be too safe with data, but if you follow the hot-spare,  extend raid set and rebuild sequence, it is not necessary. Your data  will be reconsructed automatically. That is the reason you use a  raid3/5.
    Your log file is a definite show of a serious  disk problem. Replace it, create a hot-spare, extend your raid set and  rebuild (it should be done automatically) and you are ready to roll
    >>>>
    (As a precaution I have done a backup of my raid, to an external drive)
    So once my new hard drive arrives today from Amazon, I will, in the following order:
    1)  Replace failing hard drive.  (Do I need to power down the computer to remove the failing hard drive and replace it with the hot spare?  Or can I leave the computer powered on so that the raid software can continue its CONSISTANCY CHECK while II do all of the steps to rebuild the raid  --- see note at bottom of this post...)
    2)  Create hot-spare
    3)  Use the Raid controller software (Areca) to EXTEND HOT SPARE
    4)  Rebuild raid (it should be done automatically)
    THEN, after I confirm that the raid is working okay, I will
    5)  Reinstall Windows 7.
    THe below step is what I am not entirely clear on:
    6)  I assume since the raid has already been rebuilt {before I did the windows 7 reinstall) I can do a very straightforward "reconnect" to the already working raid.  In other words, I would reinstall the Areca raid software (using the Areca cd) and identify the raid and windows 7 will recognize the 4 tb raid as my raid drive.
    I am tracking the delivery of my new hard drive and it is at least 5 or 6 hours away from arriving from Amazon.
    ****  CONSISTANCY NOTE: I the meantime I am having the Areca web based controller software do a CONSISTANCY check of the raid.
    It is half way through the check and has found 144 errors so far.   The consistancy check is rather vague about what it is doing.  But can I assume that it is finding the errors and will automatically fix them.
    Or do I have to do something to fix the errors once the consistancy check is finished (This is one reason why I would like to avoid powering down during the rebuilding of the raid.)  Or will creating the hot spare, etc interrupt the consistancy check, meaning I must finish the consistancy check completley before rebuilding the raid.
    Or should I abort the consistancy check and do that after I reinstall windows.  (If possible I would like to do that so I can get on with the editing of my current project!!)
    WHEW!
    Rowby
    Message was edited by: rowby

    WEB BROWSER-BASED CONFIGURATION
    132
    6.6.5 Check Volume Set
    To check a volume set from a RAID set:
    (1). Click on the “Check Volume Set” link.
    (2). Click on the volume set from the list that you wish to check.
    Tick on “Confirm The Operation” and click on the “Submit” button.
    Use this option to verify the correctness of the redundant data in
    a volume set. For example, in a system with dedicated parity, volume
    set check means computing the parity of the data disk drives
    and comparing the results to the contents of the dedicated parity
    disk drive. The checking percentage can also be viewed by clicking
    on “RAID Set Hierarchy” in the main menu.
    Directly from the Areca 1600 series Manual. I would let that finish.
    Eric
    ADK

  • Solaris Volume Manager or Hardware RAID?

    Hi - before I build some new Solaris servers I'd like thoughts on the following please. I've previously built our Sun servers using SVM to mirror disks and one of the reasons is when I O/S patch the server I always split the mirrors beforehand and in the event of a failure I can just boot from the untouched mirror - this method has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. However we have just got some T4-1 servers that have hardware RAID and although I like this as it moves away from SVM / software RAID and to hardware RAID I'm now thinking that I will no longer have this "backout plan" in the event of issues with the O/S updates or otherwise however unlikely.
    Can anyone please tell me if I have any other options?
    Thanks - Julian.

    Thanks - just going through the 300 page ZFS admin guide now. I want to ditch SVM as it's clunky and not very friendly whenever we have a disk failure or need to O/S patch as mentioned. One thing I have just read from the ZFS admin guide is that:
    "As described in “ZFS Pooled Storage” on page 51, ZFS eliminates the need for a separate volume
    manager. ZFS operates on raw devices, so it is possible to create a storage pool comprised of
    logical volumes, either software or hardware. This configuration is not recommended, as ZFS
    works best when it uses raw physical devices. Using logical volumes might sacrifice
    performance, reliability, or both, and should be avoided."
    So looks like I need to destroy my hardware RAID as well and just let ZFS manage it all. I'll try that, amend my JET template and kick of an install and see what it looks like.
    Thanks again - Julian.

  • Can you run RAID 5 + Hot Spare on ix4-200d, or just RAID 5?

    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hello trevorsem
    The ix4-200d would only be able to do RAID 5.  Hot spare would not be an option.  You could technically use only 3 disks in the RAID 5, but it would not be using the unit to it's best ability.
    PX class devices can use hot spares with RAID 1, 5, 6, and 10
    LenovoEMC Contact Information is region specific. Please select the correct link then access the Contact Us at the top right:
    US and Canada: https://lenovo-na-en.custhelp.com/
    Latin America and Mexico: https://lenovo-la-es.custhelp.com/
    EU: https://lenovo-eu-en.custhelp.com/
    India/Asia Pacific: https://lenovo-ap-en.custhelp.com/
    http://support.lenovoemc.com/

  • Px4-300r setup raid 5 + hot spare

    I bought a px4-300r NAS and in the spec I see it is possible to make a raid 5 with hot spare. I configured a raid 5 with 3 disk but I don't know how to set up the hot spare with drive 4 ?
    LenovoEMC™ px4-300r  
    Version : 4.0.6.19294
    BIOS : PX4 FSBFV102
    tks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Did you actually read the manual before posting this question?

  • T2000 internal hardware raid/cache

    New T2000, Solaris 11/06, with 4 internal disks 0-4.
    Ships with internal drives default cache: read=enabled, write=disabled for all 4.
    (shown with format -e)
    Planning on:
    hardware mirroring OS disk (0 -> 1)
    hardware mirroring 2nd set (2 -> 3)
    1) Is it wise/safe to turn on write cache for OS mirrored disks?
    Concerned if write cache will interfere in any way with expected operation of Solaris on the root disk. Or, possibly the swap partition.
    2) Is it wise/safe to turn on write cache for 2nd mirrored disks?
    2nd mirrored set will be used strictly for Oracle logging. Assume write cache will increase write-intensive logging effieciency with no 'ill' effects.
    3) Both hardware mirroring and write cache are addressed seperately - but nothing exlains if they play nicely together. Is it safe to assume that the write cache doesn't interfere with the mirroring?
    4) Does turning on internal disk hardware cache interfere with Solaris UFS logging?
    Appreciate help!!

    New T2000, Solaris 11/06, with 4 internal disks 0-4.
    Ships with internal drives default cache: read=enabled, write=disabled for all 4.
    (shown with format -e)
    Planning on:
    hardware mirroring OS disk (0 -> 1)
    hardware mirroring 2nd set (2 -> 3)
    1) Is it wise/safe to turn on write cache for OS mirrored disks?
    Concerned if write cache will interfere in any way with expected operation of Solaris on the root disk. Or, possibly the swap partition.
    2) Is it wise/safe to turn on write cache for 2nd mirrored disks?
    2nd mirrored set will be used strictly for Oracle logging. Assume write cache will increase write-intensive logging effieciency with no 'ill' effects.
    3) Both hardware mirroring and write cache are addressed seperately - but nothing exlains if they play nicely together. Is it safe to assume that the write cache doesn't interfere with the mirroring?
    4) Does turning on internal disk hardware cache interfere with Solaris UFS logging?
    Appreciate help!!

  • Why is hot spare in use while disk state is Okay

    In my Solaris 10 RAID-5 volume, metastat shows the hot spare in use, but all the disks' state is Okay. Why is this? I do suspect the first disk was bad at one time, and may have been pulled out and re-inserted in without issuing any solaris commands. Please help explain why, and how to recover from this situation. Thanks.
    d10: RAID
    State: Okay
    Hot spare pool: hsp000
    Interlace: 32 blocks
    Size: 860024640 blocks (410 GB)
    Original device:
    Size: 860032704 blocks (410 GB)
    Device Start Block Dbase State Reloc Hot Spare
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A380d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFAA17C8d0s2
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A230d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01012D7A0d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E010128CE0d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFC22131d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01012D7B0d0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFAF377Fd0s2 10506 No Okay Yes
    hsp000: 1 hot spare
    Device Status Length Reloc
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFAA17C8d0s2 In use 143349312 blocks Yes
    Device Relocation Information:
    Device Reloc Device ID
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A800d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013a800
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A850d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013a850
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013ABD0d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013abd0
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013B270d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013b270
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFAA17C8d0 Yes id1,ssd@n20000004cfaa17c8
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A380d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013a380
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01013A230d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01013a230
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01012D7A0d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01012d7a0
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E010128CE0d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e010128ce0
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFC22131d0 Yes id1,ssd@n20000004cfc22131
    /dev/dsk/c10t500000E01012D7B0d0 Yes id1,ssd@n500000e01012d7b0
    /dev/dsk/c10t20000004CFAF377Fd0 Yes id1,ssd@n20000004cfaf377f

    Thanks for the suggestion. Tried "metahs -e ...". "Hotspare isn't broken, can't enable".
    Tried "metareplace -e ...", "d10: device ... enabled" It's currently in sync'ing mode. I guess drive 380 was pulled out and reinserted at one point without issuing the metareplace command.
    Edited by: user8636975 on Nov 29, 2011 8:05 PM

  • Solaris possibly preventing RAID BIOS launch

    Hello
    I have installed a STLab A-230 2-Channel Serial ATA & ATA-133 RAID Combo and tried to boot into its RAID BIOS with no luck. The initial loading menu quickly switches to the multi-boot menu where you select to boot into Solaris or another OS. I am supposed to press Ctrl-Z, but it just switches to the boot menu without bringing up RAID BIOS. Please let me know if this would be to do with the installed Solaris and its uninstallation would solve it.
    Regards,
    Dai

    You can use SMC for other purposes but it won't help your with RAID.
    Sol 10 1/06 has raidctl which handles LSI1030 and LSI1064 RAID�enabled controllers (from raidctl(1M)).
    Some of the PERCs (most?) are LSI but I don't know if they are chipsets used by your PoweEdge (I doubt it).
    Generally you can break it down like this for x86:
    If you are using hardware RAID with Solaris 10 x86 you have to use pre-Solaris (i.e. on the RAID controller) managment or hope that the manufacturer of the device has a Solaris managment agent/interface (good luck).
    The only exception to this that I know of is the RAID that comes with V20z, V40z, X4100, X4200.
    Otherwise you will want to go with SVM or VxVM and manage RAID within Solaris (software RAID).
    SMC etc are only going to show you stuff if SVM is involved and VxVM has its own interface, otherwise the disks are controlled by PERC and just hanging out as far as Solaris is concerned.
    Hope this helps.

  • X2100 hardware RAID support

    Got a new X2100 server with two SATA disks.
    I upgraded the BIOS using the Supplemental 1.1 disk. The BIOS revision reported is now 1.0.3.
    Have defined a hardware RAID mirror of two SATA disks using the BIOS utility. Looks Ok and is reported as "Healty Mirror" when the machine is turned on.
    If I boot Fedora Core 4 (which is not officially supported by Sun) I see two disks instead of one as expected.
    If I boot Solaris 10 1/96 (which IS supported) then no disks are found!
    So my question is: Does anyone know if the HW RAID system on the X2100 is supported at all? And if it is, how?

    Have you looked the procedure in this manual?
    http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/html/8 19-3720-11/Chap2.html
    Also there seems to be a lack of drivers available with some operating systems ( W2003 ) on the X2100, this could be the case with FC4 ( although I use FC4 on a notebook and it seems very close to RHEL 4, but without RHEL graphics, clustering and other tools ). In the InfoDoc section of the spectrum handbook for the X2100, there is a document that discusses configuring SVM on x64 systems, at the begining the author recommends using the hardware RAID utility, this may suggest that it is supported. You should take a look through the system documentation to see if you have missed something, I'd be interested to know if you set the BIOS up for the various OS types!

  • When to replace drives, and when does the hot-spare kick in?

    Here's the situation: got an e-mail today from the RAID (no it wasn't a love letter), which alerted me to a ten-times repeated ERROR: 0x10, STATUS: 0x51 on drive 8
    I then proceded to check through the log, and found from a while back (mysteriously I never received an e-mail even though it said it had sent one!) ERROR: 0x40, STATUS: 0x51
    which were however only single/double incidents, not repeated 10 times like this latest error.
    Despite these errors, the drives show up as "OK" in RAID Admin, and the hot spare drives seem not to have been activated.
    The question is now, should I get these drives replaced ASAP, or if the RAID lists the drives as OK is everything fine and dandy? (not sure how to take a "non-recoverable error 0x40" and reconcile that with a drive status of OK)
    Ronald

    Nobody's got any answers? Bummer! The Apple manual says really nothing useful about how to aAsSsSeEsSsS error messages and when to replace drives, etc.
    It's nice to sell to people that a RAID-5 will keep the data safe, but that only works if one knows what to make of the error messages.
    I shouldn't have to spend another $1k for a tech support contract, just to learn what things mean that should be explained in the tech docs...
    Ronald
    PS: will someone tell Apple's PC watchdog that aAsSsSeEsSsS has nothing to do with aAsSsS? AaSsSsEeSsSsMmEeNnTt is a technical term, yet it wouldn't want to let me post the message because it contained aAsSsSeEsSsS! What's next? Soon we can't use the word RAID anymore, because it's refers to undesirable violence...
    Someone please pick up a dictionary, in Tiger there's both a regular app and a widget to do so, so it shouldn't be that hard...

  • MD3200i Shutdown with a Hot Spare in operation

    I have to shutdown our MD3200 to make some network modifications tied-  iSCSI and vCenter (replacing a switch)
    One of the MD3200 drives failed and the hot spare is being used (RAID 5).
    Is it safe to bring down the Md3200 while the hot spare is in operation ?
    thanks

    Hello SJNAPL,
    If the drive failed a few months back then it has most likely been copied to the hotspare.  You should be able to use MDSM & go to the Physical Tab & select the hotspare drive & it will list the drive that it is covering.
    Once you get your replacement drive and insert it into your MD3200i the MD will sense the drive & should start the copy back to the replacement drive.  Now the time that it will take is hard to say as it depends on the size of the drive and how much activity is on the virtual disk.
    Once the replacement disk has the data from the hotspare then the hotspare should go back to being a hotspare drive again & you can view this also in the summary window of MDSM& the Physical Tab as well.
    Please let us know if you have any other questions.

  • Determining Version of Hardware Raid on T5220

    Hi,
    I am running Solaris 10. Lsiutil is not installed. I use raidctl to
    manage controller.
    Am struggling with something I cannot get much help on the internet on.
    I am trying to upgrade the firmware for my 'LSI,1068E' hardware raid
    controller for a T5220 server. The firmware comes in 2 versions B1 and
    B2. I cannot seem to find out which I have. Can anyone help the update
    documentation doesn't say how. Patch ID for B1 and B2 are Patch-ID#
    140951-01, Patch-ID# 140952-01.
    Thanks in advance
    bootbk
    root@tdir01 # /usr/sbin/prtconf -vp | egrep '(LSI|firmware-version|revision-id|mpt-version)'
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000ac
    revision-id: 000000ac
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 00000043
    revision-id: 00000043
    revision-id: 00000004
    revision-id: 000000ac
    revision-id: 00000006
    revision-id: 00000006
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 00000006
    revision-id: 00000006
    revision-id: 000000aa
    firmware-version: '1.27.00.00'
    mpt-version: '1.05'
    model: 'LSI,1068E'
    revision-id: 00000004
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa
    revision-id: 000000aa

    Hello,
    I would suggest that you download both patches (140952-01 is obsoleted by 140952-02 while 140951-01 is still current) and review the contained Install.info file.
    Usually this files contains a sample run of the update process. I'm sure that the updater detects if you try to apply the firmware for the wrong hardware revision. It asks for confirmation before the update is applied.
    Did you review the Sun System Handbook page for the T5520 systemboard (there should be notes about the LSI 1068E hardware revision) ?
    I don't have access to the current contract-only SSH.
    Michael

  • X4200 hardware raid not syncing

    I got a x4200 with a RAID 1 configuration. Had a bad disk. Saw this in /var/adm/messages:
    Mar 22 17:37:00 vps3      Physical disk (target 1) is |missing|
    Mar 22 17:37:00 vps3      Physical disk (target 1) is |out of sync||missing|
    raidctl -S too showed a failed disk:
    c0t0d0               67.9G     N/A     DEGRADED OFF     RAID1
              0.0.0     67.9G          GOOD     
              N/A     67.9G          FAILED     
    So, I took it out and then replaced it with a new disk. This is what is being shown in the logs:
    Mar 23 20:25:22 vps3      Physical disk (target 1) is |out of sync||online|
    However, instead of showing a SYNC status, why does it just say DEGRADED but both disk are good:
    root@vps3:/# /usr/sbin/raidctl -l c0t0d0
    Volume               Size     Stripe     Status     Cache     RAID
         Sub               Size               Level
              Disk                         
    c0t0d0               67.9G     N/A     DEGRADED OFF     RAID1
              0.0.0     67.9G          GOOD     
              0.1.0     67.9G          GOOD     
    I am wondering if this command is just lieing to me? How can I ensure the RAID is working properly at this point? What is the best way to delete 0.1.0 device and replace it again?
    Thanks

    midhu wrote:
    Hardware RAID is configured in one of the new T3-1B blade server from ok prompt and I am able to see the details using show-volumes from ok prompt. But from Solaris OS it is not visible using raidctl -l command. It doesn't return anything. Is there any way to check the RAID status from OS. Making the OS down is not an option everytime.
    # echo|format
    Searching for disks...done
    AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
    0. c0t3CF77D9D2CF0BA99d0 <LSI-LogicalVolume-3000 cyl 65533 alt 2 hd 64 sec 139>
    /pci@400/pci@1/pci@0/pci@2/LSI,sas@0/iport@v0/disk@w3cf77d9d2cf0ba99,0
    Specify disk (enter its number): Specify disk (enter its number):
    # raidctl -l
    Edited by: midhu on Jan 26, 2013 5:30 AMYour server seems a little confused as to whether it is a T3 or T4, as you reference T4 in the title and T3 in the body.
    raidctl may not be the correct utility because either:-
    - (1) A different utility is now needed to configurare the raid for these onboard controllers on newer tin.
    or
    - (2) You are using an add in raid card that requires different software:
    Please see for example: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E22985_01/html/E22986/z40001e11389320.html

Maybe you are looking for

  • Digital ID certificate not trusted

    I'm trying to add digital ID certificates for governmental employees with whom I communicate by e-mail.  I used an e-mail including those certificates (*.cer format) to transmit the certs to the new IPad, and I was able to install them, but they are

  • Need to find action behind Forward button in the notificationdetails page

    Hi, When i enable the forward button in the workflow,the forward button apperas on the notification details page. when i click about this page link,the button appears in the list. But when i can take PG.xml code i dont find the forward button. i have

  • Enabling a disk in T3 Storage Array

    Currently using a T3 Storage Array where one of the drive slots is showing disabled. We have already replaced the bad disk and power cycled the array to try and enable the drive slot with no success. Does anyone know of a way to enable the drive slot

  • Thumbnail Size when Browsing in PS

    I am a brand new Mac user and have just converted over my Photoshop from Windows to Mac.  I am trying to increase the thumbnail size when I am browsing my images to open directly from Photoshop without going through Bridge first.  I have increase the

  • 4.1 update failed!

    Does ANYONE know what happened with the JELLYBEAN update? My phone attempted to update but failed and now it's telling me "your device is up to date! no update is necessary at this time".  My phone is not update if there is 4.1!  This is one of the r