T61 - Wireless non-connectivity following Wireless Lan update

T61 Type 7658 Lenovo installed 11a/b/g/n Mini-PCI Express adapter wireless modem has virtually ceased working since the latest update around January 2. Even with the system sitting six inches from the router no connection is possible.
Any suggestions or ideas as nothing else has changed in the way or program updates or additions.
Brian

DAF wrote:
Do I just hook up all 3 cables back to the new 4965 AGN?
Yes.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

Similar Messages

  • Wireless LAN update for Tecra M5

    Hi,
    I've downloaded the latest wireless lan driver from Tosh, version 12.4.0.21.1 and expanded the zip for my Tecra M5, PTM51E.
    When I double-click on setup.exe, I get an hourglass for a second and nothing more. Does anybody have any idea what may be inhibiting the program from running?
    Cheers.
    Rag

    Hi
    Im not quite sure why the exe file didnt start the WLan driver installation but why you dont update the Wlan driver in device manager?
    Go to device manager, choose Update driver, then use the Advanced installation, point to the driver files stored on the HDD and finish the installation.
    This should work!

  • E51 Wireless Lan - Net Connection Time Out

    Hi all,
    I cant get my E51 to open websites. It connects to my wireless LAN fine, but I get the message Net Connection Time Out when I try to browse to any website. Before the message comes up, it takes a minute or so of blank screen before the error message appears.
    I have a netgear router and I use WEP. The key is entered correctly.
    Has anyone come across this before?

    this probably is a case of a bug in ur device so what u can try are: plz make a back up
    take out your sim card and put in *#7780# to restore factory settings. you should not lose any data, but all settings will go into default. try that first.
    the second option is a reset *#7370# this one will erase all of your data, 'wipe the phone clean' and restore to factory settings. see if any of these options work and if you are able to use your phone as you like/need to.
    the third option U can go in for a hard reset which will turn ur device as it left the factory totally new
    U can also update/reinstall ur firmware and see the result...
    Also use ur device without the memory card and see
    in case of ur memory card there are different options available to you to get rid of the corrupt/unwanted data in your card.
    menu--tools--memory---options---format memory card......
    remember everything including ur factory installed apps will be deleted......... but u can always download them later either from nokia or google them...
    or insert ur card in any reader or laptop and check for virus and also the hidden folders.......
    Articles posted courtesy engadget
    keep us updated about the progress.... if u like wat I have to offer then click on khudos.

  • IOS7 update failure w/ error "Not Connected to Wireless", but I am connected- How can I update?

    My iPad has the defective "gotofailure" bug in iOS7, but there is only 1 pending update which describes a completely unrelated issue.  I am connected to my Wireless LAN, and that connection works fine.  But, when I try to download and install the pending update (Which may or may not have the major security hole fixed), the update fails with the error message "not connected to wireless".  How can I get someone at Apple support to tell me how to get around this problem?
    What am I supposed to do when the fix for a major bug is blocked by another (apparently minor) update?
    (note:  I am over the 30 day warranty, but within the 1 year warranty.  However, Apple support wants me to pay $20 to have them tell me how to fix their defective software... 
    I expect that the 1 year warranty should apply to defective software, especially this major security bug! 
    This bug completely compromises browser and internet security... it is a HUGE deal!
    see:  http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2014/02/gotofail/   ).
    This is my first Apple product since the Apple 2E.  If this is the level of customer support and warranty for defects, hardware or software, that Apple provides, it may well be my last apple product. 
    I have worked in customer support at another major computer company, and this type of policy is the surest way to send customers to your competitors that I know of.  Tim Cook, are you listening? 
    (P.S.  Don't bother trying to get the attention of any Apple Executive - they don't want to hear from customers to provide feedback on their products or policies - not by phone nor by email.)
    Any workarounds for the problem or a way to update the iOS7 to fix the security hole will be greatly appreciated. 

    Hi...
    I think here the issue may be that the utility and the internet connection are not getting synchronised. The operating system on your computer is it win XP? If it is win xp, u can use the windows wireless software to manage to your wireless network. In order to use the windows wireless zero configuration, right click on the linksys icon at the bottom right hand corner of the task bar, select the option that says "use windows wireless ....".
    The linksys icon will be grayed and windows will be managing the wireless network. Connect to your wireless network and you should be able to go online.

  • Why does Airport take so long to connect to the wireless LAN?

    I have one of the Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros. I notice that whenever I wake up my Mac from sleeping, it takes a good 10 seconds for it to find and connect to the LAN. By contrast, Windows computers seem to find it and connect almost instantly.
    Aside from having WEP encryption, there's nothing special about my LAN. It's a Linksys WRT54G, and I'm not hiding the SSID. Also, my home network is at the top of my list of preferred networks.
    Once connected, I don't notice any problems. I haven't tried any specific tests of local throughput, but web browsing and other internet traffic with the Mac is no slower than the top speed of my broadband connection.
    Also, I've talked with other Mac users, and they don't report wireless connections taking so long to be established.
    So, what's going on here and how can I fix it?
    Thanks!

    My guess is that your connection will appear even faster, although I have no explanation for that, only my experience since I installed the same update.
    Yes, your MBP firmware appears to be up to date, although the documentation is confusing. If your firmware wasn't updated at all, it would probably end with 00, instead of 01.
    Software Updates needed for Macs will appear in Software Update's automatic offerings. I'm not sure what might have happened with the AirPort Extreme Update, although I suspect it might have only been called for if a Mac was using an Apple Base Station.
    If you use Software Update to do your updates, you can check the Software Update panel of System Preferences, and on the "Installed Updates" pane, scroll down and check to see what was installed and when. I installed the same AirPort update the day after release - but then I was having an issue and was checking Software Update every day for that update to show up for my iMac Core Duo.
    [I'm not sure that firmware updates are listed there at all, perhaps only software updates.]
    To check for all downloadable updates on your own, click on "Downloads" in the Support menu bar at the top of this page. That's where firmware updates will appear if they are not included by Software Update. The last firmware updates have been appearing in Software Update. The first in 2006 didn't, but that created so much confusion among new users that I have a feeling that Apple has changed the procedure to automate it rather than have it be search and find:) Only time will tell.
    Your mention of your printer - you could check to see if Samsung has a firmware update for your printer, but no, you can't use a mixed network, you need everything connected to be using same encryption method with same network name and same password.
    I believe I understand the new AirPort Extreme "n" Base Station will support two separate simultaneous networks like that, one on the 5MHz band and second on the 2.4MHz band, but the older equipment can't do that.

  • Problem arised after updated the intel wireless lan

    Hello, everyong
    My laptop is T510. I just updated the intel wireless lan to the version of 15.02.0000.1258. After the updates, my wireless router was down when the laptop started. Initially it can connect to the router for a few seconds, then the router was down with all the lights going off except the power light. Once I restart the router, everything goes fine, my laptop is able to connect to the router without any problems. So I have to restart the router everytime when I start my laptop. Please help me. How to fix this problem?

    Why do you have to restart the router.
    Have you checked the computer WiFi profile? Why or what is not allowing the connection.
    You could delete the computer profile in Access or whatever you're using and discover, reconnect to it again as if its the first time. It may resolve the issue which is unknown.
    T520 Model 4239 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2860QM CPU @ 2.50GHz
    Intel Sandy Bridge & Nvidia NVS 4200M graphics Intel N 6300 Wi-Fi adapter
    Windows 7 Home Prem - 64bit w/8GB DDR3

  • Update ralink 802.11n wireless lan card

    Receiving a pop up saying that there is an update to ralink 802.11n wireless lan card. Is this crucial?Bad past experience with updating things that weren't crucial.  Thanks!

    Hello , Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More. I have read your post on how your desktop computer displays a pop-up message prompting you to update the wireless card installed. I would be happy to assist you in this matter! If you are not experiencing any difficulties connecting to a wireless network on your computer, I would not count the update as crucial. If your computer is having trouble connecting to the network, even if the problem is intermittent, it may be a good idea to install the update. I hope this helps, and if you have any other questions or concerns feel free to post back! Cheers

  • Wireless LAN driver can't load after BIOS update NB550D

    Hi
    I have a new NB550D and have jst installed the recommended BIOS update. Now the Wireless LAN driver can't load (error code 31).
    I tried installing the lestest driver off the Toshiba website but it still can't be loaded by Windows...
    Everything was fine before this! Any ideas?

    > In the Device Manager the Atheros Wireless is shown
    This means that the Wlan driver was installed properly and the issue could be related to configuration between Wlan card and Wlan router.
    You should check if the notebook can connect to Wlan router without the usage of any encryption settings.
    Disable the WEP/WPA encryption and test the connectivity. Of course this should be done only for test attempts.
    Are you sure that the Wlan is enabled? Enable this using FN + F8

  • Will 2800-400 BIOS update enable 802.11g wireless LAN?

    I recently bought a Belkin 54G cardbus wireless adapter for use with my Satellite 2800-400, which has a Windows ME OS.
    The setup software wouldn't install a driver, even though ME was said to be supported.
    I wrote to Belkin and they told me that it was because the laptop BIOS didn't support 802.11g wireless and that I should update the BIOS. I updated to BIOS version 2 but it didn't make any difference.
    I don't know if Belkin's instructions were on the right track or whether they were they just pushing the responsibility as far away from themselves as they could.
    Please can anyone tell me if my laptop does support 802.11g wireless, with or without the BIOS upgrade?
    TIA
    Mike

    > Hi
    >
    > Im not 100% sure if your notebook supports a
    > wireless LAN connection because I dont found any
    > informations about it.
    Thanks for the reply. the notebook does support wireless LAN because I can get a 802.11b card to function OK.
    > But as far as I know its not
    > necessary to update the BIOS therewith the Wireless
    > card works.
    Well it's done now so there may be other benefits. Not 802.11g wireless though it seems.
    > I recommend to contact the service partner. They have
    > more detailed informations about this unit.
    Thanks I'll try to find and contact a service partner.
    Mike

  • What are the following:1)Cisco 1600 Series IOS WIRELESS LAN RECOVERY. 2)Service Provider Option 60 for Vendor Class Idenfier

    What are the following:1)Cisco 1600 Series IOS WIRELESS LAN RECOVERY. 2)Service Provider Option 60 for Vendor Class Idenfier
    These items are listed with 1600 series AP but I'm unable to understand what are these things & the use of them

    DHCP Option 60:  Go HERE.

  • Windows Client cannot connect to wireless LAN through EAP-TLS

    I have a Cisco Aironet Access point which cannot be authenticated by a remote RADIUS server to connect to wireless lan through EAP-TLS. These is the debug output from the AAA process.
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.337: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.369: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.385: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.385: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: id is not matching req-id:1re
    sp-id:2, waiting for response
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.401: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.717: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.717: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:56.785: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.097: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.097: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.101: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.393: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.393: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.397: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.673: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.673: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.677: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.953: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.953: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:57.957: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.317: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.317: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.321: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.685: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.685: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.685: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.993: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: Received server response:
    GET_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE
    *Mar  7 10:56:58.993: dot11_auth_dot1x_parse_aaa_resp: found eap pak in server r
    esponse
    *Mar  7 10:56:59.041: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:57:01.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries
    *Mar  7 10:57:08.997: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server 165.72.12.12:1812,181
    3 is not responding.
    *Mar  7 10:57:08.997: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server 165.72.12.12:1812,18
    13 is being marked alive.
    *Mar  7 10:57:14.481: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:57:14.521: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:57:44.521: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0811.9650.8cb0 Authenticatio
    n failed
    *Mar  7 10:57:44.801: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:57:44.829: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:58:14.829: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0811.9650.8cb0 Authenticatio
    n failed
    *Mar  7 10:58:15.105: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:58:15.141: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:58:45.141: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0811.9650.8cb0 Authenticatio
    n failed
    *Mar  7 10:58:45.425: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:58:45.449: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:59:15.449: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0811.9650.8cb0 Authenticatio
    n failed
    *Mar  7 10:59:15.729: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:59:15.753: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:59:45.753: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0811.9650.8cb0 Authenticatio
    n failed
    *Mar  7 10:59:46.009: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:59:46.037: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:59:50.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries
    *Mar  7 10:59:50.349: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:59:50.373: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 10:59:55.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries
    *Mar  7 10:59:55.341: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 10:59:55.361: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 11:00:00.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries
    *Mar  7 11:00:00.333: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 11:00:00.357: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 11:00:05.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries
    *Mar  7 11:00:05.341: dot11_auth_dot1x_start: in the dot11_auth_dot1x_start
    *Mar  7 11:00:05.365: dot11_auth_parse_client_pak: Received EAPOL packet from 08
    11.9650.8cb0
    *Mar  7 11:00:10.077: Client 0811.9650.8cb0 failed: reached maximum retries

    Kindly get verified the configuration and the compatibility if there is a mismatch. Please find the link below for more information on EAP-TLS functions in Access points and clients.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_white_paper09186a008009256b.shtml#wp39110

  • System Update: Update of Intel Wireless LAN (11abgn, abg, bg) looping

    Hi there,
    System Updates (V. 3.14.0019) gives me a Update on Install of Intel Wireless LAN (11abgn, abg, bg) (11.5.0.36.). System Update says the Installation was successfu and wants to reboot. Doing so and running System Update again gives me the same update again
    I tried to manually remove the driver and manually install it again. Same result.
    I tried to reinstall System Update. Same result.
    Anyone ideas?
    Greetings

    SAME HERE!  T61p.  VERY ANNOYING and VERY UNPROFESSIONAL.

  • Wireless LAN Connection Configuration

    Need Basic Wireless LAN Connection Configuration Example

    Hi
    This link provide WLC configuration examples
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/products-configuration-examples-list.html
    Refer config guides if you need step by step guide for all features configurations
    HTH
    Rasika
    *** Pls rate all useful responses ***

  • Can cisco CAP2702i connect to Cisco3850 switch with wireless LAN controller license via another switch ?

    If i connect cisco AP - CAP2702i to another switch, and use trunk port between Cisco3850 and the other switch , can the AP able to register with Cisco3850 with wireless LAN controller  ?   or the AP has to directly connect to Cisco3850 in order to register?

    The AP and 3850 wireless management are in same Vlan( vlan202). The AP is new unit and did not join MC before. 
    What i did on 3850 :
    input command - wireless management interface vlan 202
                              - ap cdp
                              - wireless mobility controller
    Is there any config i miss out on 3850 and any config need to be set on AP ?
    From Ap console output show me "could not discover WLC using dhcp ip". Is it due to AP dont have IP address? If AP register with WLC through layer 2 , i believe there is no related with IP.Correct me if i'm wrong.
    Due to the 3850 is not a POE, the AP unable directly connect to 3850  . I guess have to use power adapter to power on the AP.

  • Connecting 2 wireless lans together?

    I've been having some difficulty searching for the answer to my problem. It's very simple. I'm renting the lower half of the house from my cousin. We have two internet connections in the house. One upstairs and one downstairs. So we have two cable modems and we each have a wireless router. Mine is a Linksys WRT300N I believe. His is a DLink WBR-1310. We'll call his network Lan1 and my network Lan2. Lan1 has a PC and a Ps3 behind the router. I have a PC and two Ps3's behind mine. We both have a media server running on our PC's so we can stream video to our Ps3's. We would like to connect our Lans together so we can access each other's PC and media servers to transfer/stream files. We don't want to share each others Internet connection. Each Lan has to keep it's own connection. We would prefer to connect them wirelessly but will go wired if it's a lot cheaper or easier. So how do we wirelessly connect the two lans so we can see each other's pc's but keep their own seperate internet connections? I've read something about just connecting the two routers with a normal ethernet cable and setting the gateways and dhcp settings manually. But wireless would be a lot better. I've heard something about needing a wireless bridge?

    But wouldn't that make it one big lan? I've had two routers hooked up before behind one modem and you're setup sounds similar to this. I don't remember but something like disabling DHCP on the second router and connecting it using the uplink port on one. Just extending the lan I guess.
    Would we still be using our own seperate internet connections? Kinda sounds like you're saying to make the second router a hub or switch. I'm not well versed on networking technology but I wonder if doing it your way we could set different gateway settings or whatever is needed to keep our own connections.
    From what i've read it sounds like we would need two wireless bridges. So router1>bridge---bridge<router2 kinda thing. I'd rather not spend money for two bridges though. Other option would be to run a 100 foot patch cable from one router to the other. Would they communicate this way?
    You'd think in this day and age it wouldn't be a problem to connect two lans together.

Maybe you are looking for