Table access by index rowid taking more time

Hi All
I've a query like
update tab1
  set col1 = ( select col2 from
                       tab2 
                where tab1.id = tab2.id) table 1 has arnd 10,000 rows
table 2 has arnd 1,700,000 rows and has a primay key on column id.
This query is taking around 20 secs to execute. I checked the xplan and most of time taken for table access by index rowid.
Could you please suggest what can be the reason for this. (Can it be the clustering factor or something else)
I checked the stats for the tab2, its just three days old.
Regards
Ashwani

>
table 1 has arnd 10,000 rows
table 2 has arnd 1,700,000 rows and has a primay key on column id.
This query is taking around 20 secs to execute. I checked the xplan and most of time taken for table access by index rowid.
Could you please suggest what can be the reason for this. (Can it be the clustering factor or something else)
I checked the stats for the tab2, its just three days old.
>
If you checked the xplan why haven't you posted it so we can look at it? Then we could see what table is being accessed by index rowid. Presumably it is table 2 but we the plan would eliminate the need to make assumptions.
The clustering factor could be a factor. You haven't told us how table1 is being accessed. All rows are being updated so a full table scann is most likely but again the plan would actually show the access.
Did you query the dictionary to see what the clustering factor is? Post the results of that
SQL> select index_name, leaf_blocks, avg_leaf_blocks_per_key, avg_data_blocks_per_key, clustering_factor, distinct_keys
2 from dba_indexes
3 where owner = 'schema'
4 and index_name in ('index_b','index_a');

Similar Messages

  • Create index is taking more time

    Hi,
    One of the concurrent program is taking more time , We generate the trace file and found that the create index is taking more time.
    Below is from the trace file and such type of index creation is happening lot of time in Oracle standard program.
    Can somebody let me know why there is a big difference between cpu and elapse time.
    We are seeing the PX Deq: Execute Reply Event as well.look idle time for database.
    Please let me know which parameter of the database is affecting this.
    CREATE INDEX ITEM_CATEGORIES_N2_BD9 ON ITEM_CATEGORIES_BD9(CATEGORY_SET_ID,
    SR_CATEGORY_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,SR_INSTANCE_ID) PARALLEL TABLESPACE MSCX
    STORAGE( INITIAL 40960 NEXT 33554432 PCTINCREASE 0) PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 11
    MAXTRANS 255
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 3 0 0
    Execute 1 0.35 364.82 131168 117945 60324 0
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.35 364.83 131168 117948 60324 0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 80 (recursive depth: 2)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    reliable message 1 0.00 0.00
    enq: KO - fast object checkpoint 1 0.01 0.01
    PX Deq: Join ACK 6 0.00 0.00
    PX Deq Credit: send blkd 112 0.00 0.01
    PX qref latch 7 0.00 0.00
    PX Deq: Parse Reply 3 0.00 0.00
    PX Deq: Execute Reply 604 1.96 364.42
    log file sync 1 0.00 0.00
    PX Deq: Signal ACK 1 0.00 0.00
    latch: session allocation 2 0.00 0.00
    Regards,

    user12121524 wrote:
    CREATE  INDEX ITEM_CATEGORIES_N2_BD9 ON ITEM_CATEGORIES_BD9(CATEGORY_SET_ID,
    SR_CATEGORY_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,SR_INSTANCE_ID) PARALLEL  TABLESPACE MSCX
    STORAGE(  INITIAL 40960 NEXT 33554432 PCTINCREASE 0) PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 11
    MAXTRANS 255
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Execute      1      0.35     364.82     131168     117945      60324           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.35     364.83     131168     117948      60324           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 80     (recursive depth: 2)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
    ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
    reliable message                                1        0.00          0.00
    enq: KO - fast object checkpoint                1        0.01          0.01
    PX Deq: Join ACK                                6        0.00          0.00
    PX Deq Credit: send blkd                      112        0.00          0.01
    PX qref latch                                   7        0.00          0.00
    PX Deq: Parse Reply                             3        0.00          0.00
    PX Deq: Execute Reply                         604        1.96        364.42
    log file sync                                   1        0.00          0.00
    PX Deq: Signal ACK                              1        0.00          0.00
    latch: session allocation                       2        0.00          0.00
    What you've given us is the query co-ordinator trace, which basically tells us that the the coordinator waited 364 seconds for the PX slaves to tell it that they had completed their tasks ("PX Deq: Execute Reply" time). You need to look at the slave traces to find out where they spent their time - and that's probably not going to be easy if there are lots of parallel pieces of processing going on.
    If you want to do some debugging (in general) one option is to add a query against V$pq_tqstat after each piece of parallel processing and log the results to a named file, or write them to a table with a tag, as this will tell you how many slaves were involved, how, and what the distribution of work and time was.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
    To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
    "Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
    Carl Sagan

  • How improve performance on access path TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ?

    I have table MOVEMENT with about 26millions entries,
    select rowid from movement xxx
    where
    xxx.sTransType > 0
    AND xxx.sDevice < 1000
    AND xxx.sDevice >= 0
    AND (bitand(xxx.sSaleFlag,1) = 0 AND bitand(xxx.sSaleFlag,4) = 0)
    AND xxx.sArtClassRef < 100
    and xxx.tActionTime BETWEEN TO_DATE('13-05-2011 08:08:34', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND to_date('13-05-2011 14:08:34', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ;
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 679628763
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 34 | 10102 (1)| 00:02:02 |
    |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MOVEMENT | 1 | 34 | 10102 (1)| 00:02:02 |
    |* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MOVATIME_IX | 18489 | | 51 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    1 - filter("XXX"."SARTCLASSREF"<100 AND BITAND("XXX"."SSALEFLAG",1)=0 AND
    BITAND("XXX"."SSALEFLAG",4)=0 AND "XXX"."STRANSTYPE">0 AND "XXX"."SDEVICE"<1000
    AND "XXX"."SDEVICE">=0)
    2 - access("XXX"."TACTIONTIME">=TO_DATE('2011-05-13 08:08:34', 'yyyy-mm-dd
    hh24:mi:ss') AND "XXX"."TACTIONTIME"<=TO_DATE('2011-05-13 14:08:34', 'yyyy-mm-dd
    hh24:mi:ss'))
    there is index on tActionTime - MOVATIME_IX
    This query returns 12203 rows, so I would anticipate this number in plan table in row with id 1 and column Rows
    Final question if it is possible to optimize this query and what are the next steps to do it?
    Thanks.

    >
    I thought that access path via ROWID's is the fastest way to get row
    >
    It is the fastest way to get the row - FROM THE TABLE.
    But the ROWIDs have to be gotten from the index. That is what the INDEX RANGE SCAN is doing. It is getting the ROWIDs needed and then the TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID is getting the rows.
    >
    I'am still confused with COST values, TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID has 200times higher cost than INDEX RANGE SCAN,
    >
    The index entries for a range scan are in order so they are very compact. The actual rows might be all over the place.
    Have you ever you a library? Not the online ones - I mean the old-fashioned kind that actually has books printed on paper?
    If the librarian asks you, her helper, to go get all books whose title begins with the letter 'B' how would you do it?
    You could go back to the stacks and look at every book on every shelf for books with titles' starting with 'B'. That is the same as a FULL TABLE SCAN.
    Or you could go to the card catalog, pull out the drawer (or drawers) that has 'B' on the label and look at the information on the card. Part of that information is the location of the actual book: section, stack; that is similar to the ROWID.
    The card catalog might get you to the right stack of books; then you have to search the stack sequentially to look for the book by name.
    A ROWID will get Oracle to the right block but then it has to find the right row.
    So the cost of getting ROWIDs from an index using a RANGE SCAN (where values are scanned in order) is a lot cheaper than actually getting the rows. The first two index entries needed might be right next to each other in order but the rows themselves might be far apart on the disk.

  • Query accessing SSAS cube is taking more time in power view report

    Hi,
    My SSAS server is having 16 Core's . I have created a power view in sharepoint site, which is accessing ssas cube.
    The report is taking more time to show the result.  I traced the DAX query using SQL Server profiler. When I ran this DAX query in SSAS server directly, then its taking less time but when the same query running from sharepoint server (power view) , it
    is taking more time. Number of records in the fact table is 300M . 
    Also i tracked the %process time in performance monitor, mostly the line is below 20%. I think the CPU is not fully utilized..
    Could you please help me to improve the performance of my report.
    Regards,
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    According to your description, you create a PowerView report in SharePoint site connect to SSAS cube, the problem is that it take long time to show the result in the report, now you want to improve report performance, right?
    In your scenario, you said that it takes more time to return the result in PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. For a report, its run time contain retrieval data time and render report time. So it takes more time to return the result in
    PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. And there are 300M records in the fact table, the performance can be caused by large data. Here is a blog which describes tracks down Power View performance problems.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Index Deletion taking more time

    Dear BWers,
    I am facing a problem with Index deletion of some of the cubes (total 10). Two weeks back index deletion of all the cubes used to complete in less time. But from the last two weeks, index deletion process is taking more time, almost triple the time it used to take.
    Any idea why this could have happened or any pointers to documents on improving the time taken by index deletion processes will be highly appreciated and will also be rewarded.
    Thanks in advance.
    Madhav

    Madhav,
       Make sure you required Background Process available.
    One more thing... you can ask your DBA/Basis folks to look into it. They can tell you what is happening at the DB Level.
    You try to analyze that from SM51.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.
    Assign points if it helps.

  • Taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan

    Hi all ,
    Below are the version og my database.
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    I have gather the table statistics and plan change for sql statment.
    SELECT P1.COMPANY, P1.PAYGROUP, P1.PAY_END_DT, P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION,
    P1.OFF_CYCLE, P1.PAGE_NUM, P1.LINE_NUM, P1.SEPCHK  FROM  PS_PAY_CHECK P1
    WHERE P1.FORM_ID = :1 AND P1.PAYCHECK_NBR = :2 AND
    P1.CHECK_DT = :3 AND P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION <> 'R'
    Plan before the gather stats.
    Plan hash value: 3872726522
    | Id  | Operation         | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |              |       |       | *14306* (100)|          |
    |   1 |  *TABLE ACCESS FULL| PS_PAY_CHECK* |     1 |    51 | 14306   (4)| 00:02:52 |
    Plan after the gather stats:
    Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost
    SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE
              1           4
      *TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     SYSADM.PS_PAY_CHECK*     1     51     *4*
        *INDEX RANGE SCAN     SYSADM.PS0PAY_CHECK*     1           3After gather stats paln look good . but when i am exeuting the query it take 5 hours. before the gather stats it finishing the within 2 hours. i do not want to restore my old statistics. below are the data for the tables.and when i am obserrving it lot of db files scatter rea
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    _optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
    filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      choose
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    SQL> select count(*) from sysadm.ps_pay_check;
    select num_rows,blocks from dba_tables where table_name ='PS_PAY_CHECK';
      COUNT(*)
       1270052
    SQL> SQL> SQL>
      NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS
       1270047      63166
    Event                                 Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time Wait Class
    db file sequential read           1,584,677       6,375      4   36.6   User I/O
    db file scattered read            2,366,398       5,689      2   32.7   User I/Oplease let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?

    suresh.ratnaji wrote:
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    _optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
    filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      choose
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
    Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
    On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

  • Custom Report taking more time to complete Normat

    Hi All,
    Custom report(Aging Report) in oracle is taking more time to complete Normal.
    In one instance, the same report is taking 5 min and the other instance this is taking 40-50 min to complete.
    We have enabled the trace and checked the trace file, but all the queries are working fine.
    Could you please suggest me regarding this issue.
    Thanks in advance!!

    TKPROF: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Jun 5 10:49:32 2012
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
    count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
    cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
    elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
    disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
    query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
    current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
    rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
    Error in CREATE TABLE of EXPLAIN PLAN table: APPS.prof$plan_table
    ORA-00922: missing or invalid option
    parse error offset: 1049
    EXPLAIN PLAN option disabled.
    SELECT DISTINCT OU.ORGANIZATION_ID , OU.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
    FROM
    HR_OPERATING_UNITS OU WHERE OU.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID =:B1
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
    total 3 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    3 HASH UNIQUE (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=52023 us cost=10 size=66 card=1)
    3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=61722 us)
    3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=20 pr=11 pw=0 time=61672 us cost=9 size=66 card=1)
    3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=18 pr=11 pw=0 time=61591 us cost=7 size=37 card=1)
    3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=16 pr=11 pw=0 time=61531 us cost=7 size=30 card=1)
    3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=11 pr=9 pw=0 time=37751 us cost=6 size=22 card=1)
    18 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK1 (cr=1 pr=1 pw=0 time=17135 us cost=1 size=0 card=18)(object id 43610)
    3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS (cr=5 pr=2 pw=0 time=18820 us cost=1 size=8 card=1)
    3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 43657)
    3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=32 us cost=0 size=7 card=1)(object id 44020)
    3 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=52 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 330960)
    3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=2 size=29 card=1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 11 0.01 0.05
    asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
    INSERT INTO FND_LOG_MESSAGES ( ECID_ID, ECID_SEQ, CALLSTACK, ERRORSTACK,
    MODULE, LOG_LEVEL, MESSAGE_TEXT, SESSION_ID, USER_ID, TIMESTAMP,
    LOG_SEQUENCE, ENCODED, NODE, NODE_IP_ADDRESS, PROCESS_ID, JVM_ID, THREAD_ID,
    AUDSID, DB_INSTANCE, TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID )
    VALUES
    ( SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_ID'), SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_SEQ'),
    :B16 , :B15 , SUBSTRB(:B14 ,1,255), :B13 , SUBSTRB(:B12 , 1, 4000), :B11 ,
    NVL(:B10 , -1), SYSDATE, FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S.NEXTVAL, :B9 , SUBSTRB(:B8 ,1,
    60), SUBSTRB(:B7 ,1,30), SUBSTRB(:B6 ,1,120), SUBSTRB(:B5 ,1,120),
    SUBSTRB(:B4 ,1,120), :B3 , :B2 , :B1 ) RETURNING LOG_SEQUENCE INTO :O0
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 20 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 21 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL (cr=1 pr=4 pw=0 time=36498 us)
    1 SEQUENCE FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=24 us)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 4 0.01 0.03
    SELECT MESSAGE_TEXT, MESSAGE_NUMBER, TYPE, FND_LOG_SEVERITY, CATEGORY,
    SEVERITY
    FROM
    FND_NEW_MESSAGES M, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE :B3 = M.MESSAGE_NAME AND :B2 =
    M.LANGUAGE_CODE AND :B1 = A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME AND M.APPLICATION_ID =
    A.APPLICATION_ID
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
    total 5 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=15724 us cost=3 size=134 card=1)
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=20 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_NEW_MESSAGES (cr=4 pr=2 pw=0 time=15693 us cost=2 size=125 card=1)
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_NEW_MESSAGES_PK (cr=3 pr=1 pw=0 time=6386 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 34367)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 4 0.00 0.03
    DELETE FROM MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    0 DELETE MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=4 pr=3 pw=0 time=29161 us)
    1 TABLE ACCESS FULL MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=3 pr=2 pw=0 time=18165 us cost=2 size=13 card=1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 3 0.01 0.02
    SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
    begin Fnd_Concurrent.Init_Request; end;
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
    SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
    declare X0rv BOOLEAN; begin X0rv := FND_INSTALLATION.GET(:APPL_ID,
    :DEP_APPL_ID, :STATUS, :INDUSTRY); :X0 := sys.diutil.bool_to_int(X0rv);
    end;
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net message to client 8 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 8 0.00 0.00
    begin fnd_global.bless_next_init('FND_PERMIT_0000');
    fnd_global.initialize(:session_id, :user_id, :resp_id, :resp_appl_id,
    :security_group_id, :site_id, :login_id, :conc_login_id, :prog_appl_id,
    :conc_program_id, :conc_request_id, :conc_priority_request, :form_id,
    :form_application_id, :conc_process_id, :conc_queue_id, :queue_appl_id,
    :server_id); fnd_profile.put('ORG_ID', :org_id);
    fnd_profile.put('MFG_ORGANIZATION_ID', :mfg_org_id);
    fnd_profile.put('MFG_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID', :coa);
    fnd_profile.put('APPS_MAINTENANCE_MODE', :amm); end;
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 2 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
    SELECT FPI.STATUS, FPI.INDUSTRY, FPI.PRODUCT_VERSION, FOU.ORACLE_USERNAME,
    FPI.TABLESPACE, FPI.INDEX_TABLESPACE, FPI.TEMPORARY_TABLESPACE,
    FPI.SIZING_FACTOR
    FROM
    FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS FPI, FND_ORACLE_USERID FOU, FND_APPLICATION FA
    WHERE FPI.APPLICATION_ID = FA.APPLICATION_ID AND FPI.ORACLE_ID =
    FOU.ORACLE_ID AND FA.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B1
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
    total 4 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Misses in library cache during execute: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=89 us)
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=93 us cost=4 size=76 card=1)
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=77 us cost=3 size=67 card=1)
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=19 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=51 us cost=2 size=58 card=1)
    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=27 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 22583)
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_ORACLE_USERID_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 22597)
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_ORACLE_USERID (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
    SELECT P.PID, P.SPID, AUDSID, PROCESS, SUBSTR(USERENV('LANGUAGE'), INSTR(
    USERENV('LANGUAGE'), '.') + 1)
    FROM
    V$SESSION S, V$PROCESS P WHERE P.ADDR = S.PADDR AND S.AUDSID =
    USERENV('SESSIONID')
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
    total 3 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1883 us cost=1 size=108 card=2)
    1 HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1869 us cost=1 size=100 card=2)
    1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1059 us cost=0 size=58 card=2)
    182 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSLWT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=285 us cost=0 size=1288 card=161)
    1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSUSE (ind:1) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=617 us cost=0 size=21 card=1)
    181 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSUPR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=187 us cost=0 size=10500 card=500)
    1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSLED (ind:2) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=4 us cost=0 size=4 card=1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 6 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 6 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 4
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
    total 13 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 5
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    SQL*Net message to client 37 0.00 0.00
    SQL*Net message from client 37 1.21 2.19
    log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 49 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 89 0.01 0.07 7 38 336 24
    Fetch 29 0.00 0.09 15 168 0 27
    total 167 0.02 0.16 22 206 336 51
    Misses in library cache during parse: 3
    Misses in library cache during execute: 1
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    asynch descriptor resize 6 0.00 0.00
    db file sequential read 22 0.01 0.14
    48 user SQL statements in session.
    1 internal SQL statements in session.
    49 SQL statements in session.
    0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
    Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
    Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
    1 session in tracefile.
    48 user SQL statements in trace file.
    1 internal SQL statements in trace file.
    49 SQL statements in trace file.
    48 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    928 lines in trace file.
    1338833753 elapsed seconds in trace file.

  • Sql query is taking more time

    Hi all,
    db:oracle 9i
    I am facing below query prob.
    prob is that query is taking more time 45 min than earliar (10 sec).
    please any one suggest me .....
    SQL> SELECT MAX (tdar1.ID) ID, tdar1.request_id, tdar1.lolm_transaction_id,
    2 tdar1.transaction_version
    3 FROM transaction_data_arc tdar1
    4 WHERE tdar1.transaction_name ='O96U '
    5 AND tdar1.transaction_type = 'REQUEST'
    6 AND tdar1.message_type_code ='PCN'
    7 AND NOT EXISTS (
    8 SELECT NULL
    9 FROM transaction_data_arc tdar2
    10 WHERE tdar2.request_id = tdar1.request_id
    11 AND tdar2.lolm_transaction_id != tdar1.lolm_transaction_id
    12 AND tdar2.ID > tdar1.ID)
    13 GROUP BY tdar1.request_id,
    14 tdar1.lolm_transaction_id,
    15 tdar1.transaction_version;
    Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=17 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=12 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    2 1 FILTER
    3 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TRANSACTION_DATA_ARC
    ' (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=42)
    4 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NK_TDAR_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost
    =3 Card=1)
    5 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TRANSACTION_DATA_ARC
    ' (Cost=5 Card=918 Bytes=20196)
    6 5 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NK_TDAR_7' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost
    =8 Card=4760)

    prob is that query is taking more time 45 min than earliar (10 sec).Then something must have changed (data growth/stale statistics/...?).
    You should post as much details as possible, how and what it is described in the FAQ, see:
    *3. How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow*.
    When your query takes too long...
    How to post a SQL statement tuning request
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
    Also, given your database version, using NOT IN instead of NOT EXISTS might make a difference (but they're not the same).
    See: SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

  • Child Query taking more time

    Dear Gurus/Masters/All,
    I request your valuble assistance in tuning one of my SQL.
    We are using oracle 10.2.04 version and OS is HP-UX 11.23(ia64) version
    In my production environment one SQL is taking more time to complete the task. According to EXPLAIN PLAN, i observed that one of it's WHERE condition execution is causing the issue.
    I took the explain plan of the WHERE condition which is causing the issue. It is going for full table scan to satisfy the criteria. But a normal index exists on this column.
    Main Query WHERE condition and Explain Plan.
    SELECT column list ....
    FROM
        SIEBEL.S_ADDR_PER T1,
        SIEBEL.S_PTY_PAY_PRFL T2,
        SIEBEL.S_INVLOC T3,
        SIEBEL.S_ORDER T4,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T5,
        SIEBEL.S_POSTN T6,
        SIEBEL.S_PARTY T7,
        SIEBEL.S_PROJ T8,
        SIEBEL.S_CON_ADDR T9,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T10,
        SIEBEL.S_USER T11,
        SIEBEL.S_DOC_QUOTE T12,
        SIEBEL.S_ACCNT_POSTN T13,
        SIEBEL.S_INS_CLAIM T14,
        SIEBEL.S_USER T15,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T16,
        SIEBEL.S_ASSET T17,
        SIEBEL.S_ORDER_TNTX T18,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT_TNTX T19,
        SIEBEL.S_PERIOD T20,
        SIEBEL.S_DEPOSIT_TNT T21,
        SIEBEL.S_ADDR_PER T22,
        SIEBEL.S_PAYMENT_TERM T23,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT_X T24,
        SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T25,
        SIEBEL.S_INSCLM_ELMNT T26,
        SIEBEL.S_INVOICE T27
    WHERE
       T25.BU_ID = T10.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T26.INSCLM_ID = T14.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.ELEMENT_ID = T26.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.LAST_UPD_BY = T15.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T4.QUOTE_ID = T12.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T3.CG_ASSSET_ID = T17.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.BL_ADDR_ID = T22.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T8.BU_ID = T5.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.PER_PAY_PRFL_ID = T2.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.REMIT_ORG_EXT_ID = T16.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.PROJ_ID = T8.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.BL_PERIOD_ID = T20.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.PAYMENT_TERM_ID = T23.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T12.BU_ID = T19.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.ACCNT_ID = T25.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.ORDER_ID = T18.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T4.SRC_INVLOC_ID = T3.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.ORDER_ID = T4.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.ACCNT_ID = T24.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T18.PR_DEPOSIT_ID = T21.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T27.BL_ADDR_ID = T9.ADDR_PER_ID (+) AND T27.ACCNT_ID = T9.ACCNT_ID (+) AND
       T27.BL_ADDR_ID = T1.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T25.PR_POSTN_ID = T13.POSITION_ID (+) AND T25.ROW_ID = T13.OU_EXT_ID (+) AND
       T13.POSITION_ID = T7.ROW_ID (+) AND
       T13.POSITION_ID = T6.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       T6.PR_EMP_ID = T11.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
       (T27.INVC_TYPE_CD = :1)
    ORDER BY
       T27.INVC_DT;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2576210427
    | Id  | Operation                                              | Name              | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                                       |                   |    39M|    71G|       |   624M  (1)|278:42:59 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                                         |                   |    39M|    71G|   150G|   624M  (1)|278:42:59 |
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS OUTER                                   |                   |    39M|    71G|       |   610M  (1)|272:11:24 |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS OUTER                                  |                   |    39M|    70G|       |   515M  (1)|229:48:41 |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS OUTER                                 |                   |    39M|    69G|       |   483M  (1)|215:41:04 |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS OUTER                                |                   |    39M|    68G|       |   483M  (1)|215:41:04 |
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS OUTER                               |                   |    39M|    67G|       |   483M  (1)|215:41:04 |
    |   7 |        NESTED LOOPS OUTER                              |                   |    39M|    66G|       |   406M  (1)|181:17:50 |
    |   8 |         NESTED LOOPS OUTER                             |                   |    39M|    65G|       |   343M  (1)|153:12:57 |
    |   9 |          NESTED LOOPS OUTER                            |                   |    39M|    64G|       |   311M  (1)|139:04:56 |
    |  10 |           NESTED LOOPS OUTER                           |                   |    39M|    63G|       |   185M  (1)| 82:37:56 |
    |  11 |            NESTED LOOPS OUTER                          |                   |    39M|    54G|       |   108M  (1)| 48:11:29 |
    |  12 |             NESTED LOOPS OUTER                         |                   |    39M|    53G|       |   108M  (1)| 48:11:29 |
    |  13 |              NESTED LOOPS OUTER                        |                   |    39M|    51G|       |    76M  (1)| 34:03:51 |
    |  14 |               NESTED LOOPS OUTER                       |                   |    39M|    49G|       |    76M  (1)| 34:03:51 |
    |  15 |                NESTED LOOPS OUTER                      |                   |    39M|    46G|       |    76M  (1)| 34:03:51 |
    |  16 |                 NESTED LOOPS OUTER                     |                   |    39M|    44G|       |    76M  (1)| 34:03:51 |
    |  17 |                  NESTED LOOPS OUTER                    |                   |    39M|    40G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:25:49 |
    |  18 |                   NESTED LOOPS OUTER                   |                   |    39M|    39G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:25:49 |
    |  19 |                    NESTED LOOPS OUTER                  |                   |    39M|    38G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:25:49 |
    |  20 |                     NESTED LOOPS OUTER                 |                   |    39M|    34G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:17:44 |
    |  21 |                      NESTED LOOPS OUTER                |                   |    39M|    32G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:17:08 |
    |  22 |                       NESTED LOOPS OUTER               |                   |    39M|    31G|       |    65M  (1)| 29:09:04 |
    |  23 |                        NESTED LOOPS OUTER              |                   |    39M|    30G|       |  2043K  (9)| 00:54:42 |
    |  24 |                         NESTED LOOPS OUTER             |                   |    39M|    30G|       |  2043K  (9)| 00:54:42 |
    |  25 |                          NESTED LOOPS OUTER            |                   |    39M|    25G|       |  2015K  (7)| 00:53:57 |
    |  26 |                           NESTED LOOPS OUTER           |                   |    39M|    22G|       |  2015K  (7)| 00:53:57 |
    |  27 |                            NESTED LOOPS OUTER          |                   |    39M|    16G|       |  2015K  (7)| 00:53:57 |
    |* 28 |                             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | S_INVOICE         |    39M|     9G|       |  2015K  (7)| 00:53:57 |
    |  29 |                             TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_PROJ            |     1 |   188 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 30 |                              INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | S_PROJ_P1         |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  31 |                            TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PAYMENT_TERM    |     1 |   156 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 32 |                             INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | S_PAYMENT_TERM_P1 |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  33 |                           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | S_INSCLM_ELMNT    |     1 |    77 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 34 |                            INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | S_INSCLM_ELMNT_P1 |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  35 |                          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID   | S_INS_CLAIM       |     1 |   134 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 36 |                           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | S_INS_CLAIM_P1    |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  37 |                         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | S_PERIOD          |     1 |    19 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 38 |                          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN             | S_PERIOD_P1       |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  39 |                        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | S_USER            |     1 |    25 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 40 |                         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | S_USER_U2         |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  41 |                       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID      | S_ORDER_TNTX      |     1 |    26 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 42 |                        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN               | S_ORDER_TNTX_P1   |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  43 |                      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID       | S_DEPOSIT_TNT     |     1 |    45 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 44 |                       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                | S_DEPOSIT_TNT_P1  |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  45 |                     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID        | S_ORDER           |     1 |   101 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 46 |                      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                 | S_ORDER_P1        |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  47 |                    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID         | S_INVLOC          |     1 |    47 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 48 |                     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | S_INVLOC_P1       |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  49 |                   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID          | S_DOC_QUOTE       |     1 |    21 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 50 |                    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                   | S_DOC_QUOTE_P1    |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 51 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                     | S_ORG_EXT_TNTX    |     1 |    94 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  52 |                 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID            | S_PTY_PAY_PRFL    |     1 |    74 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 53 |                  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                     | S_PTY_PAY_PRFL_P1 |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  54 |                TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID             | S_ADDR_PER        |     1 |    84 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 55 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                      | S_ADDR_PER_P1     |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  56 |               TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID              | S_ADDR_PER        |     1 |    57 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 57 |                INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                       | S_ADDR_PER_P1     |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  58 |              TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID               | S_ORG_EXT         |     1 |    32 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 59 |               INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                        | S_ORG_EXT_U3      |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  60 |             TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                | S_ORG_EXT         |     1 |    32 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 61 |              INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                         | S_ORG_EXT_U3      |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  62 |            TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                 | S_ORG_EXT         |     1 |   256 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 63 |             INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                          | S_ORG_EXT_U3      |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  64 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | S_ACCNT_POSTN     |     1 |    32 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 65 |            INDEX RANGE SCAN                            | S_ACCNT_POSTN_U1  |     1 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  66 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                   | S_POSTN           |     1 |    21 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 67 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                            | S_POSTN_U2        |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  68 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                    | S_USER            |     1 |    25 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 69 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                             | S_USER_U2         |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  70 |        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                     | S_ORG_EXT         |     1 |    32 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 71 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                              | S_ORG_EXT_U3      |     1 |       |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  72 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                      | S_ASSET           |     1 |    24 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 73 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                               | S_ASSET_P1        |     1 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  74 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                       | S_CON_ADDR        |     1 |    36 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 75 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN                                 | S_CON_ADDR_U1     |     1 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 76 |     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                                  | S_PARTY_P1        |     1 |    12 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  77 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                         | S_ORG_EXT_X       |     1 |    37 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 78 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN                                   | S_ORG_EXT_X_U1    |     1 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      28 - filter("T27"."INVC_TYPE_CD"=:1)
      30 - access("T27"."PROJ_ID"="T8"."ROW_ID"(+))
      32 - access("T27"."PAYMENT_TERM_ID"="T23"."ROW_ID"(+))
      34 - access("T27"."ELEMENT_ID"="T26"."ROW_ID"(+))
      36 - access("T26"."INSCLM_ID"="T14"."ROW_ID"(+))
      38 - access("T27"."BL_PERIOD_ID"="T20"."ROW_ID"(+))
      40 - access("T27"."LAST_UPD_BY"="T15"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      42 - access("T27"."ORDER_ID"="T18"."ROW_ID"(+))
      44 - access("T18"."PR_DEPOSIT_ID"="T21"."ROW_ID"(+))
      46 - access("T27"."ORDER_ID"="T4"."ROW_ID"(+))
      48 - access("T4"."SRC_INVLOC_ID"="T3"."ROW_ID"(+))
      50 - access("T4"."QUOTE_ID"="T12"."ROW_ID"(+))
      51 - filter("T12"."BU_ID"="T19"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      53 - access("T27"."PER_PAY_PRFL_ID"="T2"."ROW_ID"(+))
      55 - access("T27"."BL_ADDR_ID"="T1"."ROW_ID"(+))
      57 - access("T27"."BL_ADDR_ID"="T22"."ROW_ID"(+))
      59 - access("T8"."BU_ID"="T5"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      61 - access("T27"."REMIT_ORG_EXT_ID"="T16"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      63 - access("T27"."ACCNT_ID"="T25"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      65 - access("T25"."ROW_ID"="T13"."OU_EXT_ID"(+) AND "T25"."PR_POSTN_ID"="T13"."POSITION_ID"(+))
      67 - access("T13"."POSITION_ID"="T6"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      69 - access("T6"."PR_EMP_ID"="T11"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      71 - access("T25"."BU_ID"="T10"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
      73 - access("T3"."CG_ASSSET_ID"="T17"."ROW_ID"(+))
      75 - access("T27"."BL_ADDR_ID"="T9"."ADDR_PER_ID"(+) AND "T27"."ACCNT_ID"="T9"."ACCNT_ID"(+))
           filter("T27"."ACCNT_ID"="T9"."ACCNT_ID"(+))
      76 - access("T13"."POSITION_ID"="T7"."ROW_ID"(+))
      78 - access("T27"."ACCNT_ID"="T24"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
    117 rows selected.SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    2 SELECT * FROM SIEBEL.S_INVOICE T27 WHERE T27.INVC_TYPE_CD=:1;
    Explained.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1810797629
    | Id  | Operation         | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |           |    39M|     9G|  2016K  (8)| 00:53:59 |
    |*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| S_INVOICE |    39M|     9G|  2016K  (8)| 00:53:59 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - filter("T27"."INVC_TYPE_CD"=:1)
    13 rows selected.Edited by: KODS on Feb 13, 2013 1:08 PM

    Dear Ivan,
    Please find the details below.
    select * from dba_indexes where index_name = 'S_INVOICE_U1';
    OWNER                          INDEX_NAME                     INDEX_TYPE                  TABLE_OWNER                    TABLE_NAME                     TABLE_TYPE  UNIQUENESS COMPRESSION PREFIX_LENGTH TABLESPACE_NAME                INI_TRANS MAX_TRANS INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MIN_EXTENTS MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE PCT_THRESHOLD INCLUDE_COLUMN FREELISTS FREELIST_GROUPS PCT_FREE LOGGING BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR STATUS   NUM_ROWS SAMPLE_SIZE LAST_ANALYZED DEGREE                                   INSTANCES                                PARTITIONED TEMPORARY GENERATED SECONDARY BUFFER_POOL USER_STATS DURATION        PCT_DIRECT_ACCESS ITYP_OWNER                     ITYP_NAME                      PARAMETERS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               GLOBAL_STATS DOMIDX_STATUS DOMIDX_OPSTATUS FUNCIDX_STATUS JOIN_INDEX IOT_REDUNDANT_PKEY_ELIM DROPPED
    SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE_U1                   NORMAL                      SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE                      TABLE       UNIQUE     DISABLED                  CRMSBL_AEM_INDEX                       2       255          65536                       1  2147483645                                                                           10 NO           3      902796     196739390                       1                       1         125598294 VALID    196739390   196739390 10-02-13      1                                        1                                        NO          N         N         N         DEFAULT     NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  YES                                                       NO         NO                      NO     
    select * from dba_ind_columns where index_name = 'S_INVOICE_U1' order by column_position;
    INDEX_OWNER                    INDEX_NAME                     TABLE_OWNER                    TABLE_NAME                     COLUMN_NAME                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      COLUMN_POSITION COLUMN_LENGTH CHAR_LENGTH DESCEND
    SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE_U1                   SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE                      INVC_NUM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       1           200          50 ASC    
    SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE_U1                   SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE                      INVC_TYPE_CD                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2           120          30 ASC    
    SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE_U1                   SIEBEL                         S_INVOICE                      CONFLICT_ID                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    3            60          15 ASC    

  • Why oracle text index column taking long  time

    why oracle text index column is taking long time to return result.I created text index on a column if I run the query on a single table result is very fast.If I join table with other table (10 records only )
    it is taking long time but in explain plan it is searching by index only.
    I created this index for searching a varchar2 column,the data is comma seperated values like ( UK,US,IT,BR) and the table having records 20 lakhs.Normally if I query with like operater
    ( like '%US%' ) it is taking full table scan because I am using '%' both sides. Please help me on this regard how to search the data with less time. Here is may sample code and explain plan.
    SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Jan 28 16:54:22 2009
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Connected to:
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
    JServer Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
    SQL&gt; set timing on
    SQL&gt; set linesize 180
    SQL&gt; explain plan for SELECT T.esongid FROM (SELECT A.ESONGID FROM wcmedeco.EDECO_ESONGS_TERR_CTRY 
    A WHERE CONTAINS(A.TERR_CTRY_NAMES,'US')&gt;0  
      2  GROUP BY A.ESONGID)K,T
      3  WHERE  K.ESONGID=T.ESONGID;
    Explained.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    SQL&gt; select *from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation                      |  Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |                         |     1 |    26 |     4 |
    |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                         |     1 |    26 |     4 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                         |                         |     1 |    13 |     4 |
    |   3 |    SORT GROUP BY               |                         |     1 |    89 |     4 |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EDECO_ESONGS_TERR_CTRY  |     1 |    89 |     2 |
    |   5 |      DOMAIN INDEX              | IDX_TERR_CTRY_NAMES     |       |       |     0 |
    |   6 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_ESONGID_T           |     1 |    13 |     1 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note: cpu costing is off, 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    14 rows selected.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
    SQL&gt; Regards,
    Rajasekhar

    You have not formatted your code properly so we cannot see the query you're executing. Please put some line breaks in.
    Secondly, how fresh are the statistics on those tables? Are you really returning one record out of twenty million?
    Cheers, APC
    blog: http://radiofreetooting.blogspot.com

  • BSAD table is taking more time in select query.

    Hi ,
    The below SELECT query is taking more time , there is no any secondary index is there .
    Can anybody suggest how to improve it .
    SELECT bukrs
             kunnr
             augdt
             augbl
             gjahr
             belnr
             budat
             bldat
             waers
             xblnr
             BLART
             monat
             shkzg
             gsber
             DMBTR
             WRBTR
             prctr
             FROM  BSAD INTO TABLE gt_bsad
             WHERE  bukrs  = p_bukrs
             AND    kunnr  IN so_kunnr
             AND    budat  IN so_budat
             AND    xblnr  IN so_xblnr
             AND  ( blart  EQ 'DA' OR
                    blart  EQ 'DZ' OR
                    blart  EQ 'ZP' OR               "D03K904574
                    blart  EQ 'KZ' OR               "D03K904574
                    blart  EQ 'DP' )
             AND   PRCTR IN R_PC.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    chetan

    Hi Chetan ,
    I will suggest you two things :
    1. Try to add Secondary ( Non-unique) index on table BSAD with fields : mandt,bukrs,kunnr,budat,xblnr,blart,prctr.
        but before adding this index test the selectivity of this index by going to Tcode DB05
    2. In the select query you have used OR condition for blart. Instead of this try to create a ranges table for blart and append the  values 'DA','DZ','ZP','KZ','DP' and use this in the select query. This will improve the performance for sure.
    Hope this will help to ypu.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • CatSearch taking more time than full table scan

    Hi
    I have a table which has close to 140 million records. I had been exploring the option of using oracle text for search. So , I created an index(ctxcat) on the column Name by the following query.
    begin
         ctx_ddl.create_preference('FT_WL', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
         ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('FT_WL', 'prefix-index','TRUE');
    end;
    create index history_namex on history(name) indextype is ctxsys.ctxcat parameters ('WORDLIST FT_WL');
    But when I executed the following query , I have found out that catsearch is taking more time. The queries and thier stats are :-
    1. select * from history where catsearch(name, 'Jake%', null) > 0 and rownum < 200;
    Elapsed : 00 : 00 : 00.13
    Statistics :
    112 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    413 consistent gets
    28 physical reads
    0 redo size
    33168 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    663 bytes receuved via SQL*Net from client
    15 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    199 rows processed
    2. select * from history where name like 'Jake%' and rownum < 200;
    Elapsed : 00 : 00 : 00.05
    Statistics :
    1 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    220 consistent gets
    383 physical reads
    0 redo size
    26148 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    663 bytes receuved via SQL*Net from client
    15 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    199 rows processed
    Can anyone explain why this is happening?
    PS : there is no conventional index on the name column.
    Edited by: 976934 on Dec 14, 2012 3:32 AM

    The asterisk (*) is simply the correct syntax for a wildcard using catsearch. If you use % instead, then you will not get the same results. Please see the section of the online documentation below, that shows that the asterisk is the wildcard for catsearch.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/text.112/e24436/csql.htm#CHDJBGHE
    Additionally, if you want to limit the rows, then you need to get the matching results in an inner sub-query, then use the rownum in an outer query. The way that you were doing it, it first limits the rows to the first 200, then checks which of those meet the criteria, instead of the other way around. So, the correct syntax should be the following, which should also be the most efficient.
    select * from  
           (select * from history
            where  catsearch (name, 'Jake*', null) > 0)
    where  rownum < 200;

  • Taking more time for retreving data from nested table

    Hi
    we have two databases db1 and db2,in database db2 we have number of nested tables were there.
    Now the problem is we had link between two databases,whenever u firing the any query in db1 internally it's going to acces nested tables in db2.
    For feching records it's going to take much more time even records are less in table . what would be the reason.
    plz help me daliy we are facing the problem regarding the same

    Please avoid duplicate thread :
    quaries taking more time
    Nicolas.
    +< mod. action : thread locked>+

  • Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

    Hi All,
    I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
    The problem,
    Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
    Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
    While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
    While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
    final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
    Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
    TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
    tableB.setID(bean.getID);
    tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
    This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
    For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
    regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
    Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
    I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
    Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
    Thanks & Regards
    VB

    Hello,
    Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
    1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
    2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
    Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
    http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Query in timesten taking more time than query in oracle database

    Hi,
    Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
    than query in oracle database.
    I am mentioning in detail what are my settings and what have I done
    step by step.........
    1.This is the table I created in Oracle datababase
    (Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0)...
    CREATE TABLE student (
    id NUMBER(9) primary keY ,
    first_name VARCHAR2(10),
    last_name VARCHAR2(10)
    2.THIS IS THE ANONYMOUS BLOCK I USE TO
    POPULATE THE STUDENT TABLE(TOTAL 2599999 ROWS)...
    declare
    firstname varchar2(12);
    lastname varchar2(12);
    catt number(9);
    begin
    for cntr in 1..2599999 loop
    firstname:=(cntr+8)||'f';
    lastname:=(cntr+2)||'l';
    if cntr like '%9999' then
    dbms_output.put_line(cntr);
    end if;
    insert into student values(cntr,firstname, lastname);
    end loop;
    end;
    3. MY DSN IS SET THE FOLLWING WAY..
    DATA STORE PATH- G:\dipesh3repo\db
    LOG DIRECTORY- G:\dipesh3repo\log
    PERM DATA SIZE-1000
    TEMP DATA SIZE-1000
    MY TIMESTEN VERSION-
    C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh>ttversion
    TimesTen Release 7.0.3.0.0 (32 bit NT) (tt70_32:17000) 2007-09-19T16:04:16Z
    Instance admin: dipesh
    Instance home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32
    Daemon home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32\srv\info
    THEN I CONNECT TO THE TIMESTEN DATABASE
    C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh> ttisql
    command>connect "dsn=dipesh3;oraclepwd=tiger";
    4. THEN I START THE AGENT
    call ttCacheUidPwdSet('SCOTT','TIGER');
    Command> CALL ttCacheStart();
    5.THEN I CREATE THE READ ONLY CACHE GROUP AND LOAD IT
    create readonly cache group rc_student autorefresh
    interval 5 seconds from student
    (id int not null primary key, first_name varchar2(10), last_name varchar2(10));
    load cache group rc_student commit every 100 rows;
    6.NOW I CAN ACCESS THE TABLES FROM TIMESTEN AND PERFORM THE QUERY
    I SET THE TIMING..
    command>TIMING 1;
    consider this query now..
    Command> select * from student where first_name='2155666f';
    < 2155658, 2155666f, 2155660l >
    1 row found.
    Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.668822 seconds.
    another query-
    Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENTS WHERE FIRST_NAME='2340009f';
    2206: Table SCOTT.STUDENTS not found
    Execution time (SQLPrepare) = 0.074964 seconds.
    The command failed.
    Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENT where first_name='2093434f';
    < 2093426, 2093434f, 2093428l >
    1 row found.
    Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.585897 seconds.
    Command>
    7.NOW I PERFORM THE SIMILAR QUERIES FROM SQLPLUS...
    SQL> SELECT * FROM STUDENT WHERE FIRST_NAME='1498671f';
    ID FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
    1498663 1498671f 1498665l
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.15
    Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
    that query in oracle database.
    Message was edited by: Dipesh Majumdar
    user542575
    Message was edited by:
    user542575

    TimesTen
    Hardware: Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64; 8 x Dual-core AMD 8216 2.41GHz processors; 32 GB RAM
    Version: 7.0.4.0.0 64 bit
    Schema:
    create usermanaged cache group factCache from
    MV_US_DATAMART
    ORDER_DATE               DATE,
    IF_SYSTEM               VARCHAR2(32) NOT NULL,
    GROUPING_ID                TT_BIGINT,
    TIME_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    BUSINESS_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    ACCOUNT_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    INSTR_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    EXECUTION_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
    NO_ORDERS               TT_BIGINT,
    FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
    QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
    COMMISSION               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_COMMISSION               TT_BIGINT,
    FILLS_NUMBER               TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_FILLS_NUMBER          TT_BIGINT,
    AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
    NOTIONAL               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_NOTIONAL               TT_BIGINT,
    TOTAL_PRICE               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_TOTAL_PRICE          TT_BIGINT,
    CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT     TT_BIGINT,
    ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
    ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
    REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
    ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
    CNT_ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
    AGENT_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_AGENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    CLEARING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLEARING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    EXECUTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_EXECUTION_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    TRANSACTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_TRANSACTION_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
    ORDER_MANAGEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_ORDER_MANAGEMENT          TT_BIGINT,
    SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_AGENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_EXECUTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_EXECUTION     TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_TRANSACTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_TRANSACTION     TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT     TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_AGENT               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_EXEC               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_EXEC          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_TRANS               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_TRANS          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_SETTLE               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_SETTLE          TT_BIGINT,
    CHARGEABLE_TAXES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CHARGEABLE_TAXES          TT_BIGINT,
    VENDOR_CHARGE               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_VENDOR_CHARGE          TT_BIGINT,
    ROUTING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_ROUTING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_ROUTING          BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
    CLIENT_ROUTING               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_CLIENT_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
    TICKET_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_TICKET_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
    RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     BINARY_FLOAT,
    CNT_RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
    PRIMARY KEY(ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID, INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID,EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID),
    READONLY);
    No of rows: 2228558
    Config:
    < CkptFrequency, 600 >
    < CkptLogVolume, 0 >
    < CkptRate, 0 >
    < ConnectionCharacterSet, US7ASCII >
    < ConnectionName, tt_us_dma >
    < Connections, 64 >
    < DataBaseCharacterSet, AL32UTF8 >
    < DataStore, e:\andrew\datacache\usDMA >
    < DurableCommits, 0 >
    < GroupRestrict, <NULL> >
    < LockLevel, 0 >
    < LockWait, 10 >
    < LogBuffSize, 65536 >
    < LogDir, e:\andrew\datacache\ >
    < LogFileSize, 64 >
    < LogFlushMethod, 1 >
    < LogPurge, 0 >
    < Logging, 1 >
    < MemoryLock, 0 >
    < NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS, BYTE >
    < NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP, 0 >
    < NLS_SORT, BINARY >
    < OracleID, NYCATP1 >
    < PassThrough, 0 >
    < PermSize, 4000 >
    < PermWarnThreshold, 90 >
    < PrivateCommands, 0 >
    < Preallocate, 0 >
    < QueryThreshold, 0 >
    < RACCallback, 0 >
    < SQLQueryTimeout, 0 >
    < TempSize, 514 >
    < TempWarnThreshold, 90 >
    < Temporary, 1 >
    < TransparentLoad, 0 >
    < TypeMode, 0 >
    < UID, OS_OWNER >
    ORACLE:
    Hardware: Sunos 5.10; 24x1.8Ghz (unsure of type); 82 GB RAM
    Version 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    Schema:
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
    TABLESPACE TS_OS
    PARTITION BY RANGE (ORDER_DATE)
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MINVAL VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS,
    PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MAXVAL VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    TABLESPACE TS_OS
    NOCACHE
    NOCOMPRESS
    NOPARALLEL
    BUILD DEFERRED
    USING INDEX
    TABLESPACE TS_OS_INDEX
    REFRESH FAST ON DEMAND
    WITH PRIMARY KEY
    ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
    AS
    SELECT order_date, if_system,
    GROUPING_ID (order_date,
    if_system,
    business_dim_id,
    time_dim_id,
    account_dim_id,
    ordertype_dim_id,
    instr_dim_id,
    execution_dim_id,
    exec_exchange_dim_id
    ) GROUPING_ID,
    /* ============ DIMENSIONS ============ */
    time_dim_id, business_dim_id, account_dim_id, ordertype_dim_id,
    instr_dim_id, execution_dim_id, exec_exchange_dim_id,
    /* ============ MEASURES ============ */
    -- o.FX_RATE /* FX_RATE */,
    COUNT (*) no_orders,
    -- SUM(NO_ORDERS) NO_ORDERS,
    -- COUNT(NO_ORDERS) CNT_NO_ORDERS,
    SUM (filled_quantity) filled_quantity,
    COUNT (filled_quantity) cnt_filled_quantity, SUM (quantity) quantity,
    COUNT (quantity) cnt_quantity, SUM (commission) commission,
    COUNT (commission) cnt_commission, SUM (fills_number) fills_number,
    COUNT (fills_number) cnt_fills_number,
    SUM (aggressive_fills) aggressive_fills,
    COUNT (aggressive_fills) cnt_aggressive_fills,
    SUM (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) notional,
    COUNT (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) cnt_notional,
    SUM (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) total_price,
    COUNT (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) cnt_total_price,
    SUM (CASE
    WHEN order_status = 'C'
    THEN 1
    ELSE 0
    END) cancelled_orders_count,
    COUNT (CASE
    WHEN order_status = 'C'
    THEN 1
    ELSE 0
    END
    ) cnt_cancelled_orders_count,
    -- SUM(t.FX_RATE*t.NO_FILLS*t.AVG_PRICE) AVERAGE_PRICE,
    -- SUM(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
    -- COUNT(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) CNT_STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
    SUM (routed_orders_no) routed_orders_no,
    COUNT (routed_orders_no) cnt_routed_orders_no,
    SUM (routed_liquidity_qty) routed_liquidity_qty,
    COUNT (routed_liquidity_qty) cnt_routed_liquidity_qty,
    SUM (removed_liquidity_qty) removed_liquidity_qty,
    COUNT (removed_liquidity_qty) cnt_removed_liquidity_qty,
    SUM (added_liquidity_qty) added_liquidity_qty,
    COUNT (added_liquidity_qty) cnt_added_liquidity_qty,
    SUM (agent_charges) agent_charges,
    COUNT (agent_charges) cnt_agent_charges,
    SUM (clearing_charges) clearing_charges,
    COUNT (clearing_charges) cnt_clearing_charges,
    SUM (execution_charges) execution_charges,
    COUNT (execution_charges) cnt_execution_charges,
    SUM (transaction_charges) transaction_charges,
    COUNT (transaction_charges) cnt_transaction_charges,
    SUM (order_management) order_management,
    COUNT (order_management) cnt_order_management,
    SUM (settlement_charges) settlement_charges,
    COUNT (settlement_charges) cnt_settlement_charges,
    SUM (recovered_agent) recovered_agent,
    COUNT (recovered_agent) cnt_recovered_agent,
    SUM (recovered_clearing) recovered_clearing,
    COUNT (recovered_clearing) cnt_recovered_clearing,
    SUM (recovered_execution) recovered_execution,
    COUNT (recovered_execution) cnt_recovered_execution,
    SUM (recovered_transaction) recovered_transaction,
    COUNT (recovered_transaction) cnt_recovered_transaction,
    SUM (recovered_ord_mgt) recovered_ord_mgt,
    COUNT (recovered_ord_mgt) cnt_recovered_ord_mgt,
    SUM (recovered_settlement) recovered_settlement,
    COUNT (recovered_settlement) cnt_recovered_settlement,
    SUM (client_agent) client_agent,
    COUNT (client_agent) cnt_client_agent,
    SUM (client_order_mgt) client_order_mgt,
    COUNT (client_order_mgt) cnt_client_order_mgt,
    SUM (client_exec) client_exec, COUNT (client_exec) cnt_client_exec,
    SUM (client_trans) client_trans,
    COUNT (client_trans) cnt_client_trans,
    SUM (client_clearing) client_clearing,
    COUNT (client_clearing) cnt_client_clearing,
    SUM (client_settle) client_settle,
    COUNT (client_settle) cnt_client_settle,
    SUM (chargeable_taxes) chargeable_taxes,
    COUNT (chargeable_taxes) cnt_chargeable_taxes,
    SUM (vendor_charge) vendor_charge,
    COUNT (vendor_charge) cnt_vendor_charge,
    SUM (routing_charges) routing_charges,
    COUNT (routing_charges) cnt_routing_charges,
    SUM (recovered_routing) recovered_routing,
    COUNT (recovered_routing) cnt_recovered_routing,
    SUM (client_routing) client_routing,
    COUNT (client_routing) cnt_client_routing,
    SUM (ticket_charges) ticket_charges,
    COUNT (ticket_charges) cnt_ticket_charges,
    SUM (recovered_ticket_charges) recovered_ticket_charges,
    COUNT (recovered_ticket_charges) cnt_recovered_ticket_charges
    FROM us_datamart_raw
    GROUP BY order_date,
    if_system,
    business_dim_id,
    time_dim_id,
    account_dim_id,
    ordertype_dim_id,
    instr_dim_id,
    execution_dim_id,
    exec_exchange_dim_id;
    -- Note: Index I_SNAP$_MV_US_DATAMART will be created automatically
    -- by Oracle with the associated materialized view.
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART_UDX ON OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
    (ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID,
    INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID, EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID)
    NOLOGGING
    NOPARALLEL
    COMPRESS 7;
    No of rows: 2228558
    The query (taken Mondrian) I run against each of them is:
    select sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."NOTIONAL") as "m0"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."FILLED_QUANTITY") as "m1"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."AGENT_CHARGES") as "m2"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."CLEARING_CHARGES") as "m3"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."EXECUTION_CHARGES") as "m4"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TRANSACTION_CHARGES") as "m5"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ROUTING_CHARGES") as "m6"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ORDER_MANAGEMENT") as "m7"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."SETTLEMENT_CHARGES") as "m8"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."COMMISSION") as "m9"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_AGENT") as "m10"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_CLEARING") as "m11"
    --,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_EXECUTION") as "m12"
    --,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TRANSACTION") as "m13"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ROUTING") as "m14"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ORD_MGT") as "m15"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT") as "m16"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES") as "m17"
    --,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TICKET_CHARGES") as "m18"
    --, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."VENDOR_CHARGE") as "m19"
              from "OS_OWNER"."MV_US_DATAMART" "MV_US_DATAMART"
    where I uncomment a column at a time and rerun. I improved the TimesTen results since my first post, by retyping the NUMBER columns to BINARY_FLOAT. The results I got were:
    No Columns     ORACLE     TimesTen     
    1     1.05     0.94     
    2     1.07     1.47     
    3     2.04     1.8     
    4     2.06     2.08     
    5     2.09     2.4     
    6     3.01     2.67     
    7     4.02     3.06     
    8     4.03     3.37     
    9     4.04     3.62     
    10     4.06     4.02     
    11     4.08     4.31     
    12     4.09     4.61     
    13     5.01     4.76     
    14     5.02     5.06     
    15     5.04     5.25     
    16     5.05     5.48     
    17     5.08     5.84     
    18     6     6.21     
    19     6.02     6.34     
    20     6.04     6.75

Maybe you are looking for

  • When I "Add file to library" it doesn't stay there. Help please?

    Like, it will stay listed in iTunes but say it isn't found. Also sometimes when I try to edit info for these files it freezes iTunes. Getting pretty frustrated here. Help please?

  • JNI with GCC

    I use java1.4.2_01 on a win98 (don't ask) machine. I am trying to run an "hello world" app with the method in C. The code is identical to that given here, http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/native1.1/stepbystep/index.html. My code works, if the

  • Load Balancing in OSI Layers

    Hi, Can anyone explain about how load balancing happening in each layer of OSI Model ? Thanks , Prakalathan.

  • Safari generated website password lost...

    Hello all... ISSUE: I created a user profile for a forum. Safari suggested a password, so I selected to use it.  Now I am trying to sign in with the info, but Safari will not auto-fill the password, and the site is not found in the keychain access. W

  • Does aperture 3.5 support RAW for Olympus E-M1

    Does Aperture 3.5 support RAW for the new Olympus E-M! camera yet? Thanks