Table BSAS don't contain Cleared FI Document

Hi,
When we post an FI document we have normally as result an entry in the Tables : BSEG and BSIS
And when we clear this FI document we get an other entry in The table BSAS (and the clearing date in BSEG is updated)
For my case, i don't find the cleared document in BSAS, knowing that the clearing date in BSEG was updated !
Please why i don't have an entry in BSAS after clearing my Document ?
Regards.

Please try the following tables as well.
BSAD (Customer)
BSAK (Vendor)
Elias
Edited by: Elias Akorli on Oct 23, 2009 6:43 PM

Similar Messages

Document is alrady contains cleared items-reversal not possible

Hi All,
At the time of MIRO reversal we are getting error massage Document is already contains cleared items-reversal not possible
actually one MIRO document using TDS line item and we make a payment for that TDS line item after that we try to reserve MIRO document that time we are getting error massage.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
juhi

Hi Spradip & Minesh,
Thanks
But as per my client they do the same in system but this document only not getting reveres why they don't know.
but what we do because they want to reverse the document.
Please help me
Thanks & Regards,
Juhi

MR8M-Document already contains cleared items - reversal not possible

Hi Gurus,
I am getting error message Document XXXXX 1000 2014 already contains cleared items - reversal not possible while cancelling IR via Tcode MR8M.
Invoice was already paid twice by mistake hence we are trying to cancel via MR8M.
I know we can do via FBRA by resetting the cleared item but is there any other options or workaround?
Thanks,
Kumar

Hi Jurgen,
Thanks for your reply;
Invoice posted twice and 1 needs to be reversed. Please refer the attached screenshot.
Thanks,

Unable to cancel Billing due to cleared accounting document for Free Goods

Hi,
I have a case as described below:
I.                    SALES ORDER CREATION
Transaction VA01 à Sales order is created for the following details:
1.       Material Normal (TAN) : 100 CAR
2.       Free Goods (TANN) : 10 CAR
II.                  Subsequent processing of sales order
a.       Delivery(1) and Billing (1) creation for the SO with the following details :
Material Normal (TAN) : 100 CAR
Free Goods (TANN) : 5 CAR
Status of accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: Not cleared
                Accounting Journal:
                A/R                                                                     xxxx
                Sales discount                                                     xxxx
                                General Domestic Sales                                        xxxx
                                VAT u2013 Out(TAX)                                                    xxxx
b.      Delivery (2) and Billing (2) is then being made for the leftover item of the Sales Order:
Free Goods (TANN) = 5 CAR
Status of Accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: CLEARED
Accounting Journal
Dr. Sales Discount                                        xxxx
                        Cr. General Domestic Sales                  xxxx
III.                Reversal of Billing (2) needs to be done
Activities conducted:
a.       Go to VF11 and enter Billing (2) document number
b.      Execute!
System response:
Error Log:
1)      Data inconsistency during processing of document xxxxxxx
2)      The Billing Document xxxxxxx is already cleared
From the error found, we tried to reverse the cleared accounting document by using t-code FBRA:
System response:
Document xxxxxx IS NOT a clearing document
Question:
We have to reverse the clearing document first in order to cancel the related billing document but we keep finding this error, do Anyone have any advice to solve this issue?
We have simulated similar transaction in IDES and no problem is found, is there any specific setting in customizing that can allow cancellation of billing document regardless of its accounting document status (Cleared or Not Cleared) ?
Thanks in Advance,
Indro

Thanks a lot for the reply,
It answers my question, I found the copying requirement using routine 029 was defined in the cancellation document section of the Billing type to be cancelled
After removing, the billing document can be cancelled
Thanks,
Indro

No appropriate line item is contained in this document

Dear experts.
I am trying to do a Vendor clearing through F-44. The vendor line items display shows 2 line items as open items. These 2 documents have been posted with a special GL indicator.
With the required specifications when I try to clear the Vendor line items, the error message "No appropriate line item is contained in this document", what could be the reason for this is not to appear in F-44 while clearing the vendor lines.
regards
venkat

Dear,
Check following threads
F-28 T-CODE - Open Document is not being pulled
Not able to clear an open line item using F-44
Regards
Saurabh

RFBIBL00 - No appropriate line item is contained in this document

I have an LSMW based on RFBIBL00 for generating FI Docs. Unfortunately it doesn't find the FI doc to clear.
In BSELK TBNAM = BSELKand AGUMS = AK.
In BSELP I use the FI reference document, so TBNAM = BSELP, FELDN_1 = XBLNR and SLVON_1 = the reference with the leading zeros.
When I process it gives a warning message No appropriate line item is contained in this document FB05 3 SAPMF05A 0733 6 W F5 228.
It processes the item but without clearing the reference document.
Any idea how to solve this?
Thanks in advance,
Peter

Hi Tamás,
Thanks a lot for your help. Unfortunately this OSS note is valid until SAPKH46C15, and we are already on release 4.70x200 (SAPKH47024).
If I set the BSELK-XNOPS flag, the clearing item is found, however I still have problem with the amount.
Best regards,
Peter

No appropriate line item is contained in this document : Error in F-03

HI All,
when I am trying to clear a G/L account in F-03, for a document I am getting the error
'No appropriate line item is contained in this document'
I can see the open item in FBL3N and this is not a special G/L item
what can be the possible reason. Please let me know.
Regards
Rudra

Hi All,
Let me explain the situation a bit more clearly.
The document contains 4 line items. with g/L accounts A, B, C, D .
In F-03, I am entering the document number and G/L account A .
Then when I am trying to clear I get the error, ' No appropriate line item is contained in this document'
I checked in FBL3N. I entered the above document in selection criteria and entered all the 4 G/L accounts.
In the output I can see 2 items. One with G/L account A , with a RED DOT and other with G/L account B
with a TICK Symbol.
There are no clearing documents linked.
So please throw some pointer as to what can be the possible reason of the error and the corresponding
solution.

POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING - clear two documents

Hi,
I need to create a new program that should be able to clear two documents by comparing the ASSIGNMENT filed of the payment document (DZ) against the REFERENCE field of the installment invoice (II).
I can do this via batch input in FB05 (choosing open item -> Select Document Number in Radio Button -> Enter Account -> Click Process Open Items -> Enter Document Numbers -> Post).
However, I came across the FM POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING and tried to use it. Unfortunately, I was not successful in using this to clear the items that I need to clear.
Do you think I can use the said FM for clearing two open items to produce one clearing doc using the document number?
Can you please provide sample code if you have one?
Thank you very much in advance for your inputs.
Best regards.
Brando

Please be informed informed that the invoice and payment are already present in table BSID. I would just need to clear them in my custom program. Thanks.

11.4.0 How to CLEAR Recent Documents? Prior version had a delete option. Run 4.1.1 on a 64Gb Excite tablet. Thanks

I just updated my tablet to the new version. I find no options to clear/delete Recent Documents. Where do I find that option? Or do they self de-solve in time?
Thanks

This is Senko from earlier in the thread something went wrong somewhere and after a few attempts to retrieve a lost password and email to that aodbreader-android address (failed every time) I gave up and made a new account.
I use a large amount of manuals and pdfs in my work and will often open 10+ different ones a day. Previously I could regularly clear recent documents so I only had the ones I was using at the time in recent documents but I had the original I could reopen if needed.
With the removal of this feature recent documents is utterly useless as I have dozens of "recent" documents making it almost impossible to find one specific one as its easy to scroll past the one I want. However deleting the original is no use because I may well need it again a few days later so I'd be constantly deleting and reinstalling files. Compared to the previous convenience of just clearing recent documents so I only actually have the ones relevant to what I'm doing at the time in recents but being able to retrieve another if it turns out to be useful.
Currently I don't bother to use recents at all but will just open documents go to the relevant folder and open the one I want since I have 20+ files in my recents list and don't want to permaenntly delete any of them. This feature is one I would greatly appreciate being restored as it makes my work life much easier.

How to change table but don't touch SQL using it?

we have old_table (date, key, value1, value2, value3)
where we have values on every key for every day
values are changed very rarely, so we are considering to redesign table to slow changing dimension:
new_table (date_start, date_end, key, value1, value2, value3)
where new record with new date_start + date_end + key entry is added only when values are changed
BUT all SQL which used to query old_table:
SELECT ...
from old_table
where date = date '2010-01-01'
- will not work anymore!
We know one straightforward approach - VIEW based multiplication of rows - which will help to use old SQL:
create table table_new(date_start date, date_end date, key number, value1 number, value2 number, value3 number)
Table created
insert into table_new values(date'2010-01-01',date'2010-01-05',1,1,2,3);
1 row inserted
insert into table_new values(date'2010-01-06',date'2010-01-15',1,11,22,33);
1 row inserted
create or replace view old_table as
select trunc(date_start)+rn as date_, key, value1, value2, value3
from table_new tn
, (select rownum-1 rn from all_tables where rownum < 100) p
where p.rn <= trunc(date_end-date_start)
View created
SELECT *
from old_table
where date_ = date '2010-01-01';
DATE_ KEY VALUE1 VALUE2 VALUE3
01/01/2010 1 1 2 3
SELECT *
from old_table
where date_ = date '2010-01-10';
DATE_ KEY VALUE1 VALUE2 VALUE3
10/01/2010 1 11 22 33
But we dont believe than it is efficient on rowcount about a million.
Is there any approach?
ref cursor, pipelined, something else?
the only one requirement is - OLD SQL with "where date = date '2010-01-01'" should work unchanged.

I don't think that helps because it isn't just that there is a different table, but the queries are different. In hindsight, the way to avoid this problem rather than "fix" it is to isolate your queries into packages and then the application is calling the modified (or overloaded?) function or procedure and the impact is minimized.
If the OP is trying to minimize storage by saving only ranges instead of the data for each and every day, then one solution would be to make the new view generate the values for each day within the range on the fly. (There was a similar question in this forum just this week about generating missing data.) The queries think they are going after the original table because there is in fact a row in the view for each day. But that would (possibly) make sense only if it was storage that was being minimized. I don't think this approach would be as efficient as using the actual date ranges if the data is migrated to such a table. I wasn't clear from the OP what the goal was behind the table change.

Need to clarify why some clearing accounting documents without no line item

Hi All,
there are few clearing accounting documents created. In that for very few documents are generated without line item.
could you anyone tell me what might me the reason?
waiting for your reply,
Regards

Hi Chintan,
Thanks for your reply. there are some other clearing documents where i can execute it through FB03. but there are only 3 documents which are not appering in fb03. it says list contains no data. can you please tel me what might me the reason.
Regards

Repos - logical table source does not contain mapping

Hi,
I have a repository question?
I do not have a fact table in my physical layer. Do I have to have one? I thought the fact table got created in the BM.
I do have a date table in the physical layer, but it isn't joined to any other table.
I added the PK from the date_dimention to my logical fact table.
when I open the properities of my logical date table it is mapped to the physical date table.
Now in answers, I can query the date_dimension without error.
But, when I query the fact table using the date key, I get this error.
Error Details
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table CRTK_FACTS) does not contain mapping for [CRTK_FACTS.MASTER_AI_ID, CRTK_FACTS.INT_DOC_ID, CRTK_FACTS.DATE_KEY]. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT CRTK_FACTS.MASTER_AI_ID saw_0, CRTK_FACTS.INT_DOC_ID saw_1, CRTK_FACTS.DATE_KEY saw_2 FROM CRTK ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1, saw_2
Anyone have any suggestions on what I am missing?
thanks,
Kathy

I don't have a fact table in the physical layer. Do you mean join between the date table and other dimension tables?
or do I have to build the fact table in the physical layer?
I have not built any hierarchies yet, working on it.

OB28 validation: not possible to clear future documents

Hi dudes,
I'm looking for how to build an FI validation (if possible) on OB28.
The purpose is to block users to clear a document of a future year.
Ex.
billing document y. 2009
payment document y.2010
the users create a clearing document with y.2009
It's possible to block this action with a simple OB28 validation?
I tried with a BKPF-BUDAT < BSEG-AUGDT but possibly I can't use two different tables on the same validation step.
Thanks.
Regards

You can use a exit in your validation.
1. Check that you have declared the form pool for application area "GBLR" validations in View V_T80D_SL. If not, then enter the name of the form pool (e.g. YRGGBR000) and copy the standard program RGGBR000 to the new program (e.g. YRGGBR000).
2. Declare the exit (the exit name, by convention is U9<XX>, where <XX> is a serial number.) after data statements in "FORM get_exit_titles" as follows:
form for Future Clearing
exits-name = 'U9<XX>'.                  "Description/ Purpose
exits-param = c_exit_param_none.
exits-title = text-9<XX>.                     "Name of the exit
APPEND exits.
3. Put your Code/ Logic in a new form "U9XX" as follows:
FORM U9<XX> USING b_result.
<PUT YOUR OWN CODE HERE>
*All fields of Tables BKPF, BSEG, COBL, GLU1 & ANLA are available here>
*REMEMBER - Some of the field values might not have been populated>.
ENDFORM.
4. Maintain text symbol U9<XX>, activate the form pool/ text symbol and exit.
5. Use OB28 to create a new step in a new or existing validation at suitable call up point.
6. Enter any pre-requisite, if required.
7. Select the "Check" node of your validation step. select "Exits" tab. You will find your exit U9<XX> here. Double click on it to insert in the "Check" code.
8. Select the "Message" Node of your validation step and enter the message type, no and variables. Save & Exit.
Regards
K.K. Tripathi

OBIEE: Incorrectly defined logical table source doesn't contain mapping

In OBIEE 10.1.3.2 I have a very simple thing but cannot get it to work. Hopefully someone can point out the mistake. I have the same schema on two different database that I want to compare data.
The schema is simple. Table (dimension) A has two columns: id and name. Table (Fact) B has two columns: id and value. Table B.id is a foreign key to A. I imported two database schema into the physical layer and for each database, I built the foreign key relationship between table A and B. In the logical layer, I have two logic tables, one to represent A (Dimension) and the other B (Fact) with a logical join. Each logical table has two data sources. For the dimension tables, both id and name columns have two sources. For the fact table, the id has two sources and for the value, I created two separate columns, one called value1 and the other value2 with one from one database's B table's value column and the other from another database's B table's value. They then were made available at presentation layer.
Now in the Anwser, I can build a query with id from dimension and value1 from fact; it displayed fine. Same with a query with id from dimension and value2 from fact, it displayed fine. However, if the query is id, value1 and value2, I got the following error
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table B) does not contain mapping for [B.value1 [ ] , B.value2 [ ] ]. (HY000)
Is there something I have to do additional to make both values appearing the same time.?
Thanks for your help
Ralph

Hi, Siddhartha P
I don't think I understand your information. I couldn't find connection pool at the business mapping layer. I only see it in the physical layer. Do you mean to do the mapping at the logical source table? That's only places I see any mappings and I don't see complex join there (only inner join, left outer, right outer and full outer) What mappings should I need to create between table B (fact table) of database 1 and table B (fact table) of database 2. I thought they don't have any relationship other than join through a dimension table which has columns that map to both table A (dimension table) of database 1 and 2. Then the logical fact table has 3 columns, one is id (to join to Dimension table) with two mappings (one to table B of database 1 and one to table B of database 2) and one column value1 which maps only to table B's value of database 1 and another column value2 maps to table B's value of database 2. That seems to be done correctly because I can pick column id and value1 or column id and value2 and have them displayed correctly but not all 3. I thought if it can display the two separately correctly, they should be able to display all 3. no?
I am not getting any inconsistency error.
There must be something I still don't understand. If you don't mind give me a little more direction, that would be great.
Thanks
Ralph

How to export all images that don't contain editable text

Hi guys,
Is there any hack, script or general function to export all images from a PDF withouth them containing editable text?
For instance, i have a pdf that contains some scanned documents - these need exporting, i also have some tables in there that have editable text in them - these are being exported when i select export all images.
Can anyone help?
Cheers!

Search for a word or words in them as a group. Search for .pdf file type and containing....
Use a common word that they all might contain such as "a" or "the", etc.
The files that have been OCR'd will show up in the search. This won't catch 100% of them, but it will allow you to separate most of them.

Table BSAS don't contain Cleared FI Document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for