Table COBRB,  Distribution Rules Settlement Rule Order Settlement

Hi Experts,
Could you help me?
I would like save every modification of COBRB Table,
Because we want to keep control of  Distribution Rules and its modifications.
Thanks in advance,
regards,
Ignacio

Hi Mrinal,
Thanks for your answer.
Our problem was to have a detail about any change of this table...
But If we cant as you said... I ll give up to try it.
Regards,
Ignacio

Similar Messages

  • No PSG in settlement rule (table COBRB)

    Hi,
    I have a Sales Order which had a settlement rule created to PSG and had been settled already.  However, currently, the customer of that SO became invalid as well as contract type. So I tried to realign (KEND) this PSG, unfortunately, the current PSG has gone (no PSG no. in table COBRB), in settlement rule, there are some incompleted data left, such as customer, plant...
    Now I would like to close this Sales Order (no balance in KVBI), however, since there is incompletion log regarding the incomplete PSG and settlement rule, it is unable to close the SO. In case I tried to end the old settlement rule and create a new one, it seems to be unable to create using the new customer with new mapping.
    Please kindly advise how to solve this problem.
    Thank you.
    Sirirak

    answered

  • Creation of Distribution rule(Settlement rule) in production order

    Hello SAP GURUS,
        I have one good query for you guys.When we create production order,by default it takes settlement rule (settle the cost of production order to material even that 100% settlement),and its because we have given the distribution rule (Default rule) in Order type dependent parameters.But in one of my friend system when i was creating production order manually it was not taking settlement rule by default and when i was going to save the order it was saying that settlement rule is not defined.I checked in order type that settlement profile was defined their.Even i checked in order type dependent parameter, distribution rule(default rule)  was their as material 100% settlement,defined over their.
      could you guys help in understanding this problem that where we have to define that system should create settlement rule by default(Settlement to material and even that 100% settlement).

    Hi..
    please try this....Goto KSR2_VBP.
    THere are two strategies.. 01 and 02.
    01 for manual creation of settlement rules
    02 for auto creation..
    first check whether 01 and 02 are in your plant.
    Sales and distrib....basic functions......auto gen. of settlement rules.......
    here you ll find two activities.
    (1)maintaining the settlement strategies and
    (2)activating one among them.
    If you activate 02, your problem will be solved..
    Also check this..
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a9/ab777d414111d182b10000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    The settlement profile is to be defined for thee particular Order Type to generate automatically.
    Define Production Order Type in OPJH
    Under Cost controlling check the settlement profile .
    If not create the same in OPJH.
    Settlement Profile: Create settlement profile - SPRO > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product cost by Order > Period End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile
    Enter Settlement profile from OPJH or Choose one for production order
    and configure Settlement profile. Indicators
    with wishes
    karthick.

  • AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets.  The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match.  Here are the steps that have been followed.
    Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
    Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
    Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
    Settle Internal Order to AUC.
    Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
    Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets)  This is where my customer gets the error. 
    They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October.  It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year. 
    Thanks for you help.
    Rick 

    Hello Stacy, 
     Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy.  I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.   
    Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on.  My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade.  This explains the problem and we have a resolution.  We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.  
    I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.   
    Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Rick

  • Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

    Hi
    I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments).  I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
    Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
    Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi..
    1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
    2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
    Basic concept is :
         A)  Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
         B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
    I think this will give you some light on this issue.
    kkumar

  • Settlement, Distribution rule; Validity limit

    Dear All,
    When ever i m creating the Internal Order in KO01, the following are the things i maintained in the Order;
    Settlement Profile in Order Type
    Its is a Real Order
    Stastical Order CB was Deselect;
    These are the things i maintained even though it shows the following Errors;
    1. Enter a distribution rule for WBS element without a validity limit
        Message no. KD059
    2. Enter a distribution rule for Cost center without a validity limit
        Message no. KD059
    Actually my doubt is where we have to maintain the Validity Limit? In Settlement Profile or where?
    Regards
    Raj

    Dear Greta Baranyai      
    Here it shows the following error while doing the settlement in cj88, here the sender is the WBS; In that WBS I mantained the Rule Recevier Cat : CTR, Cost Center Name: XXX, Settlement : Full, & 100 etc.,  Even though it shows the following Error.
    Error:- Maintain the settlement rule of the sender
               Message no. KD205
    Any help
    Regards
    Raj

  • How to create distribution rules group for wbs settlement rules

    Hi,
    How can I create distribution rules group for WBS element settlement rules ?
    For some WBS elements I can see(in view mode(cj03)) distribution groups in settlement rules screen but when I try to edit settlement rules I only see default group.
    How can i create/edit those groups ?
    Regards,
    Rafał

    Self answered:
    CJIC t-code

  • Create internal order with reference - Do not copy distribution rule group

    Hi,
    I'm creating an internal order with reference to another order through tcode KO01. When i will display the new internal order, i already have distribuion rule group that was copied from the reference order. To delete the incorrect distribution rule group i execute tcode KO02, however this information do not appear in tcode KO02.
    What should be done to delete this settlement rule? I do not want to copy the settlement rules from the old internal order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ana Fernandes

    Hi.
    'What should be done in order to do not copy this information when i create the internal order with reference?'
    in tcode kot2_opa do not maintain Settlement profile for Order category 3
    Also go to KOM2 and delete Settlement rule for order, from which you copying.
    'in table COBRB i can see the information however i can not delete it. The validy period is empty.'-in su53 check authority

  • Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

    Hi Experts:
    I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment  that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
    but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
    I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
    Thanks and regards!
    Manuel

    Hi,
       Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector. 
    When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
    The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type  is always PER (periodic).
    Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
    regards
    Waman

  • Table relating equipment and settlement order

    Hi,
    I need table relation to fetch the Internal order number using equipment number.

    I'm assuming you mean the settlement order within an equipment master (organisation tab). If so, then it is stored in table ILOA (EQUZ-ILOAN = ILOA-ILAON).
    But the easiest way to find this data is via view table V_EQUI where DATBi = 99991231 (or >= TODAY).
    PeteA

  • Changing the automatic Distribution Rule from Per to Full

    Hello SAPians,
    I have a scenario where the Customer is maintaining the Moving Average Price (I know this is not SAP suggested, I am in the process of convincing to move from moving avg to Std) for the Semi-finished goods and finished goods.
    It is Product Cost by Order scenario where Process Orders are using and the settlement rule to the Material and distribution rule is "Per" (Periodic). The main reason Customer had this Per was they would not be able to settle the Order once they settle it in full.
    But due to increased issues in month end atctivities due to thie 'Per' settlement (settlement of Process Orders not settling properly in the last month due to the failure of Batch jobs and other reasons). I want to suggest them to use Distribution Rule 'Full' instead of 'Per' because of the following advantages considering the above scenario.
    1. The 'Full' settlement can be settled if the Order is not in Teco or closed status any number of times as long as there is the Variance sitting on the Order.
    2. The 'Full' Distribution rule will not create issue if the variance is sitting on the Order in the closed period because when you do the settlement in the next period, system will allocate the variances from the last period to the Material Receiver in the current Period(I have not yet tested this scenario) and has not been. (Yeah I know there will be issue if the Material has been moved out of inventory before the settlement happens, they have another set up to update the Material prices manually by keeping the track of cost of Material).
    3. So the config change will be the Product cost by Order -> Manufacturing Order-> Define Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Typ --> change the Default rule from PP1 to PP2 'Process orders (periodic settlement)'
    Please let me know if what I am thinking is wrong based on this sceanrio and also please give me some more insight if I am missing any points.
    Thank you very much for your time!
    -Harter.

    Hi Balaji/Ajay,
    Could you please help me in understanding the effect of Variances if I change the Order type to FULL in this scenario (Moving Average price for Finished good Material)?
    I checked the configuration and the Variance is only Total Variance that is settling to FI and COPA.
    Also client is more concentrated on Variance accumulated per year and not per month.
    Let's say I have Order in Period 9 where the actual debits on the Order are $1000 and actual credits are $1200 where balance (variance) is $200 and suppose I missed the Period 9 settlement and I want to settle this Order in Period 10 where I had $100 variance in that Period 10
    Period         Variance on Order                Status
    9              $200                   missed
    10              $100                   not yet
    So now when I settle the Order in period 10 (with FULL as settlement type), it settles $300 instead of $100 variance. So if this is the case, if I look at the Variance data, yes the variance data is wrong but if I look at yearly perspective, it looks right but I think I am missing something here, right?
    Also what happens if the Order is open more than one year and the same scenario happens, the Variance will be posted to new year which is again issue, right?
    Am I in the right direction?
    Please advice.
    Thank you,
    -Harter.

  • AIAB- maximum number of distribution rule gruops has been reached

    Hi experts,
    I am getting the error u201CMaximum no. of distribution rule group has been reachedu201D, while running Transction code - AIAB for distribute asset for the asset capitalization from AuC.
    Anybody facing this type of error earlier if yes how to resolved
    thanks
    gkumar

    The objects reached to 999 hence system is throwing error.
    So you can delete some of them if not required and create a new one. Check below
    On the basis of your entries in the settlement rules, the system automatically determines the processing sequence for the settlement objects so that you can settle all objects completely. Each object is given a hierarchy number between 0 and 999. The object with the highest number is settled first and the object with the lowest number is settled last.
    For example, repair or maintenance orders have hierarchy number 100. Orders for a turbine or cooling have hierarchy number 050, and the order for your power station has hierarchy number 000. Therefore, the system first settles the repair- or
    maintenance costs to the turbine or cooling, and then settles these orders to the power station.

  • Behaviour of Distribution rules of an Investment measure

    Hi,
    For Investment Measures (Internal Orders or WBSE) which are in REL status & AUC got created automatically, the distribution rules also get automatically created taking the AUC as receiver.
    Any observations on the condition as mentioned below? :-
    "Over a period of time, lets say after the 1st periodic settlment (or before also), distribution rules disappear (both in change / display modes of the object) but when you run respective settlements system behaves normally & settles the value to the same AUC".
    regards

    REL status & AUC got created automatically, the distribution rules also get automatically created taking the AUC as receiver.
    Settlement rules will not be created automatically when AUC is created. it will be created only during first settlement run.
    Over a period of time, lets say after the 1st periodic settlment (or before also), distribution rules disappear (both in change / display modes of the object)
    If you dont see the settlement rule before first settlement run, it is a std behaviour. But I dont think it will disapper after you run settlement.

  • AUC distribution and settlement based on quantity

    we have a requirement. my client want to procure 100 air conditioners under AUC, and want to capitalize it at the time of putting it to use. So, we need to capitalize the asset based on quantity. Is there any method to distribute/settle based on quantity. As i can only find option of percentage and amount in distribution rule.
    regards

    hi,
    did you try it with
    Equivalence number for order settlement
    The costs collected in the sender object are distributed to the settlement receivers, in proportion to the equivalence numbers.
    Kind Regards
    Tarik

  • Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

    Hi,
    I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
    can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group.....
    Regards,

    Hello
    If any un used rules are there then only the said programme deleted the rule, if 999 rules are used then it is better to look for other options   like transfer the values to another Internal order
    Thanks
    Kameshwar Rao

Maybe you are looking for