Table to validate Commitment Item Group....

Hi all,
I am using tcode: gmclass. What is the table to validate field 'Commitment Item Group' -> fipex_grp?
Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
Regards,
Fred.

Program is using the followint tables
TABLES: t777o,
 objec.
TABLES: gmspclass, " structure Sponsored Class
 gmspprogram, " structure Sponsored Program
 gmspresponsible, " Responsible for Program
 gmauthgrp, " Authorization Groups
 gmauthgrpt. " authorization groups texts
TABLES: igmspclass, " Screen fields for class
 igmspprogram. " Screen fields for program
also check
GMFGC Field group criteria (Grants)
GMFGC_1 Field group criteria (Grants) system+user
Go to SE11 and search Gm*
Hope thisll give you idea!!
P.S award the points.
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Knowledge comes but wisdom lingers!!"

Similar Messages

Table for Commitment Item Groups

Does smbd. know a table for Commitment Item Groups and probably a function module which reads a commitment item group from a commitment item ?
Kind Regards
Alexey

You can use FM K_HIERARCHY_TABLES_READ with e_class = '0311'.
Rob

Commitment item group not displayed as level node when generate report FM

Hi all,
We created commitment item group or funds centre group through tcode i.e FM_SETS_FIPEX1. We create group with lower node such as hierarchy.
However when we generate the standard report with the commitment item group or funds centre group, we find no hierarchies as commitment item/funds centre group figure. Just flat, no hierarchies, no level node.
How to make it displayed as commitment item/fundcentre group ?
It maintained on drilldown report or something else?
Dewi

Dewi,
For report painter reports you can create groups using transaction FMRP_CI_SET_HIER - Create Group Hierarchy from Master Data Hierarchy or create sets using GS01, with them you can view the reports with the master data hierarchy.
Regards
César

Commitment item group

Hi,
Here is the situation: Our commitment item group has commitment items in a random fashion (they do not follow a range). so when a new CI is created, the user has to manually enter them to the respective group. How can this be changed? i.e. how can we set it so that when a new CI is created it automatically gets assigned to the right group?
Thanks.
AJ

Hi,
If you create gorup which works on the interval ranges, then while defining new commitment item wihtin one of these ranges, it will be automatically assigned to the group. There is no other way of automatic assignment...
Regards,
Eli

Different commitment item between FI/CO and FM

hi,
We have defined a commitment item group 506 and two sub commitment items 70 and 90 which are Directly postable in Former Budget Structure Template. And these sub commitment items was defined in the G/L account master record.
We park FI documents all through using commitment items 70 and 90. But I find some Funds Center only commitment item group 506 displayed in Report FMRP_RFFMTO30X.
Our DEV system have a client copy from PRD at 2008.6.1. In DEV system I find some Funds Center displayed commitment item 70 and 90 in Report FMRP_RFFMTO30X. That mean these commitment items is right before 2008.6.1, Some operates made budget controlling changed from 70 and 90 to 506.
I want to know, which operates could make this and how can I revert.
Loren

Hi,
Please read note 429517: INFO: Currency translation Billing document -> CO-PA
This note clearly explains how the currency translation takes place
regards
Waman

Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

Hello Experts,
I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
For the component we can find the table RESB.
But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
Please guide me the TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
Thanks and Regards,
Narendra

Hi,
The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
Regards,
Eli

Post Commitment Item & sponsor class to a group accounts

Hello,
In this area, Financial - Public Sector Magement - Funt Management
Some body knows if it's possible restrict the posting of the commitment Item and the
sponsor class to a group of accounts?
Thanks,

Hi Luis,
Can you emphasize more on your request? The document chain is this that FI document generates FM entry (except for earmarked funds), so what restrictment are you looking for? If you do not want certain CI used with certain G/Ls (assuming that you do not derive CI, but enter it manually, which is not common), you can always use validations (OB28).
Regards,
Eli

Commitment Item not found in budgeting tables

We are trying to create a special report for our client,whenever we try
to insert the budget data we cannot match some fields included in
diferent tables. We have found fields:"VERSION"(VERSN),"AMOUNT"(VAL0)
but we cannot match this fields with the Commitment Item (FIPEX) field.
We have searched in a lot of tables for example FMIT,FMIOI,FMBL....We really don't know where to look, we are a bit desperate.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi,
you can assign the G/L account with the valuation class through transaction obyc.
or you can assign the G/L to commitment item through transaction FMDERIVE.
REGARDS
JASH

How to validate non commited items in detail block.

Hi All,
I have a Detail block with 10 rows and 2 columns. the select of items is based on LOV. If i select One item in one row, then the user cannot select the same item again in other rows. either I need to not show the selected item in LOV or I need to raise form trigger failure and ask him to change values. This is to be done before commiting the items. Can anyone, please suggest me some way or triggers I can use.
Thank you.

If the process is done by a key-commit trigger or a when button-pressed trigger then it is simple . But if there is no such trigger then you should create it because it is more convenient to make controls inside key-commit rather than in pre-update or pre-insert because these triggers do not accept restricted built-ins.
To validate your items just loop through the list of records and compare the values to the one you are on. Then if there are no match then you go to the next record to search for.
Something like this :
declare
v_current_value_to_compare varchar2(100);
v_record pls_integer;
begin
go_block('detail_block_name');
first_record;
while :system.last_record = 'FALSE' loop
loop
next_record;
v_current_value_to_compare := :detail_block_name.item_name;
v_record := :system.trigger_record;
if :detail_block_name.item_name = v_current_value_to_compare then
-- make your control here
end if;
exit when :system.last_record = 'TRUE';
end loop;
go_record(v_record);
end loop;
end;

Structures with group of commitment items ...

Hi Gurus,
I have this query with 3 different structures in rows and each structure has a bunch of commitment items (some are individuals and some ranges) restricted with the KF 0FM_AMOUNT1. Whenever I run the query, the results give me the total for each structure. Everytime I have to drilldown with commitment item to see each individual commitment item. User wants to see all commitment items results without drilldown.
Any help is appreciated. I will assign points.
Thanks.

Hi Toja,
It will be possible to see the results only on the drilldown. But you can try this: Add the Commitment items char to the rows (drilldown) in the query definition and in the properties set it to No Display.
Hope this helps...

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Assignment of Commitment items to G/L Accounts

Hi to All,
My name is samad farooq , currently we are have upgrade our system from version 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
In 4.6C, we maintained assignment of G/L Accounts to Commitment Item via transaction code FS00.
Now same has been maintained in ECC6.0 but it gives error no commitment item found for processing.
We can maintain using the derivation strategy (FMDERIVE), but as we have upgraded, is there any way to automatically system derive the commitment without mention all the data again by using the derivation strategy.
Thanking you all in Advance.
Samad Farooq

Hello,
commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
Kind regards,
Dirk

Commitment Item Categories

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me below commitment item categories available in sap.
Category :
1 - Balance
2 - Revenues
3 - Expenditures
4 - Balances
5 - Clarification Work List
Please differentiate between cat 1 and 4.?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
SAM.

Hello,
commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
Kind regards,
Dirk

Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

Dear All,
We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
Account Assignment Category was P-Project
The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
We have already escalated it to SAP.
Thanks in advance
Anil Shanbhag

Hi,
Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with Program RM07CUFA
Regards,
Biju

Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

HI SAP MM Gurus,
Good day!
Here is my scenario:
We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
Kind regards,
DeLo

Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
Now this is tricky.
One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
go to table KONH
in the field VAKEY enter your contract(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces) and contract line(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).
look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A016 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
working forward.
if the condition table is A016
Get A016-KNUMH from A016
A016-KAPPL = 'M'
A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
A016-EVRTN = Your Contract Number
A016-EVRTP = Your Contract Line Number
Select DATAB (Validity Start Date), DATBI (Validity End Date) from KONH
where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
Cheers!
Rishi

Table to validate Commitment Item Group....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for