Table with column group (one column) - next row is showing on new page instead of below previous row

I am creating new table. My goal is to display some text in few lines like this:
"AAAAAAAA" "BBBBBBBB" "CCCCCCCCC"
"DDDDDDD" "EEEEEEEE"
Actually the next row (with "DD" and "EE" values) is not displayed below first row, but on the next page.
I've tried to put table into rectangle, disabled all page breaks and still the same effect. Any help?

Hi Heidi,
Actually, it's not solution, I only gave more details about my problem :)
Another description:
In my report I'm creating Tablix with Column grouping. There is only one column with image (every image has same width). If there is only three pictures, then they are displayed next to each other in one row.
In case, there is more than three pics, another row is showing on next page. I'd like to display all rows one after another on one page.
I've tried to create three vertical lists, and filter each column group to display only records:
1) =(RowNumber("Tablix1")) mod 3 = 1
2) =(RowNumber("Tablix1")) mod 3 = 2
3) =(RowNumber("Tablix1")) mod 3 = 0
Unfortunately, I got an error:
"A FilterExpression for the tablix ‘Tablix1’ uses the function RowNumber. RowNumber cannot be used in filters."
Do You have any other propositions?
--------EDIT--------
ok, I manged to solve it. As I said, I've created three vertival lists and placed them next to each other.
Then, instead of using filter, I've used Visibility trigger:
1)
=IIf(RunningValue(Fields![rowgroupfield].Value, COUNTDISTINCT, "Tablix1") mod 3 = 1, false, true)
2)
=IIf(RunningValue(Fields![rowgroupfield].Value, COUNTDISTINCT, "Tablix2") mod 3 = 2, false, true)
3)
=IIf(RunningValue(Fields![rowgroupfield].Value, COUNTDISTINCT, "Tablix3") mod 3 = 0, false, true)
I had to use function RunningValue to count all occurrences, as my report is quite complex and "RowNumber" [ssrs function] and "ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [rowgroupfield])" [sql query] were not working properly.

Similar Messages

How to create Dynamic Table with more than one column?

Hi,
I'm trying to learn Dreamweaver. I'm trying to display 2 units from my database in the same row then I would like go to next row.
By default DW shows single record in each row. Is it possible to display more than one?
Thank you

Of course. You will not name the divs differently, they will all be <div class="RowContainer"> (in the example below) and the reason they will look like
1 2
3 4
5 6
is because they will "stack themselves up". That is, the first will float to the top left, the next will float up next to it. The third will not fit on the top line floating next to two, so it will start a new row. Four will float up next to it, and five will start the new row.
Think of the string of divs (don't put wordspaces between them...) as a continuous ribbon or chain of divs. That is a slightly poor analogy, since the second and third won't be next to each other, as a chain or a ribbon might be. But you should be able to have as many divs as you have records... you define the div in the CSS and in your page markup really only show one div.
Here's a modified example from one of my files:
<div spry:region="ds1" class="...">
<div spry:repeat="ds1" class="RowContainer"> 
    {category} {title} {medium}<br>
     {price} {sold} {date}<br>
     {sold_to_purchase_price}
</div>
</div>
Beth

Spatial index creation for table with more than one geometry columns?

I have table with more than one geometry columns.
I'v added in user_sdo_geom_metadata table record for every column in the table.
When I try to create spatial indexes over geometry columns in the table - i get error message:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 8
ORA-06512: at line 1
What is the the solution?

I'v got errors in my user_sdo_geom_metadata.
The problem does not exists!

Row chaining in table with more than 255 columns

Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahav

user10952094 wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahavYesterday, I stated this on the forum "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." My statement needs clarification. It was based on the following:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
"Oracle Database can only store 255 columns in a row piece. Thus, if you insert a row into a table that has 1000 columns, then the database creates 4 row pieces, typically chained over multiple blocks."
And this paraphrase from "Practical Oracle 8i":
V$SYSSTAT will show increasing values for CONTINUED ROW FETCH as table rows are read for tables containing more than 255 columns.
Related information may also be found here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c11schem.htm
"When a table has more than 255 columns, rows that have data after the 255th column are likely to be chained within the same block. This is called intra-block chaining. A chained row's pieces are chained together using the rowids of the pieces. With intra-block chaining, users receive all the data in the same block. If the row fits in the block, users do not see an effect in I/O performance, because no extra I/O operation is required to retrieve the rest of the row."
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B14340_01/data.htm
"For a table with several columns, the key question to consider is the (average) row length, not the number of columns. Having more than 255 columns in a table built with a smaller block size typically results in intrablock chaining.
Oracle stores multiple row pieces in the same block, but the overhead to maintain the column information is minimal as long as all row pieces fit in a single data block. If the rows don't fit in a single data block, you may consider using a larger database block size (or use multiple block sizes in the same database). "
Why not a test case?
Create a test table named T4 with 1000 columns.
With the table created, insert 1,000 rows into the table, populating the first 257 columns each with a random 3 byte string which should result in an average row length of about 771 bytes.
SPOOL C:\TESTME.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL255,
COL256,
COL257)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=1000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat are the results of the above?
Before the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue        166
After the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue        166
After the select:
NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE
table fetch continue        252        332 Another test, this time with an average row length of about 12 bytes:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME2.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL256,
COL257,
COL999)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWith 100,000 rows each containing about 12 bytes, what should the 'table fetch continued row' statistic show?
Before the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue        332
After the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue        332
After the select:
NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE
table fetch continue        252      33695The final test only inserts data into the first 4 columns:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME3.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL4)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat should the 'table fetch continued row' show?
Before the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue      33695
After the insert:
NAME                      VALUE
table fetch continue      33695
After the select:
NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE
table fetch continue        252      33695 My statement "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." needs to be clarified:
"Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows +(row pieces)+ if a column beyond column 255 is used, but the 'table fetch continued row' statistic +may+ only increase in value if the remaining row pieces are found in a different block."
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
Edited by: Charles Hooper on Aug 5, 2009 9:52 AM
Paraphrase misspelled the view name "V$SYSSTAT", corrected a couple minor typos, and changed "will" to "may" in the closing paragraph as this appears to be the behavior based on the test case.

How to create a table with more tan 20 columns

I created a A4 landscape document to make a calendar for the next year.
To add the date information I need to insert a table with 32 columns (name of month + 31 days). It should be possible to create a table with a over all width of 29.7 cm (consisting of 1 column of 4.9 cm and 31 columns with 0.8 cm)?
Remark: Yet reduced all indention's (? German: Einzug) and other spacers and the size of used font of the table.

Hello Till,
unfortunatly Pages connot create a table with more than 20 columns. This is no question of size or place.
But you can create two tables, set the most right border of the fist table to "no line" and align the second table (with the other 12 columns) at the right side of the first table. Now you have "one" table with 32 columns.
I have done this with my driving book (Fahrtenbuch, um es korrekt zu schreiben and it works fine.
Frank.

REMOVE_ELEMENT in a Table with ( tree by key Column )

Hi all,
Designed a table with Tree by key column ( a Normal table with tree )
In one of the row there is a Drop down field provided for selection.
We have delete button provided to the customer.
In this delete button handeled removing the Lead selected row using the method REMOVE_ELEMENT of COntext_node.
so in the context node if we are having 15 elements. The particluar hierarchy selected can have minimun 4 elements
In the UI display the total node( total hierarchy node) is getting deleted but in the debugging mode the node is having 14 elements.
Kindly suggest how to handle it so that in the node also i have the total hierarchy deleted.
Thank you,
Usha

Hello Usha,
For this you need write the logic. If you are deleting a context element of ID say 'ROW1', then you need to take care of deleting all the context element which has parent key as 'ROW1'.
BR, Saravanan

Table with varying number of columns

Hello experts,
my issue:
I need to print a table with varying number of columns. Depending on if all cells of a certain column are initial the
whole column should disappear. Hiding is not enough.
If this columns is in the middle of the table the following columns should move left to fill the gap.
my approach: (maybe there is an easier one)
There are 4 different possible situations. My approach was to create 4 different tables with different amount of
columns. In the interface I fill the table that is really needed from the source table data and fill a flag that characteristics
the situation, possible values (1,2,3,4).
In the form I'd like to print the appropriate table depending on the situations.
my problem:
How to place all 4 possible tables lying upon each other in the form and print only the needed one depending on the flag value?
my question:
Is my approach ok? Or is there an easier one?
If it is ok. How can I solve the problem regarding printing the right table.
Thanks in advance!
Heinz

Hi Heinz,
You can handle it with FormCalc Script at initialization.
Suppose you have a table with name TABLE having a header HEADER and data row DATA:
TABLE-->HEADER(Cell1...Cell2...Cell3...Cell4)
--->DATA(Cell1...Cell2...Cell3...Cell4)
Suppose you want to hide Cell3 for null values, then write below code at initialization of DATA:
if(DATA[*].Cell3.rawValue eq null)
then
DATA[*].Cell3.presence = "hidden"
HEADER.Cell3.presence = "hidden"
else
DATA[*].Cell3.presence = "visible"
HEADER.Cell3.presence = "visible"
endif
Hope it would help.
Regards,
Vaibhav

How to create a table with varied number of columns?

I am trying to create a balance table. The colunms should include years between the start year and end year the user will input at run time. The rows will be the customers with outstanding balance in those years.
If the user input years 2000 and 2002, the table should have columns 2000, 2001, 2002. But if the user input 2000 and 2001, the table will only have columns 2000 and 2001.
Can I do it? How? Thanka a lot.

Why did you create a new thread for this?
How to create a table with varied number of columns?

Table with more than 35 columns

Hello All.
How can one work with a table with more than 35 columns
on JDev 9.0.3.3?
My other question is related to this.
Setting Entities's Beans properties from a Session Bean
bought up the error, but when setting from inside the EJB,
the bug stays clear.
Is this right?
Thank you

Thank you all for reply.
Here's my problem:
I have an AS400/DB2 Database, a huge and an old one.
There is many COBOL Programs used to communicate with this DB.
My project is to transfer the database with the same structure and the same contents to a Linux/ORACLE System.
I will not remake the COBOL Programs. I will use the existing one on the Linux System.
So the tables of the new DB should be the same as the old one.
That’s why I can not make a relational DB. I have to make an exact migration.
Unfortunately I have some tables with more than 5000 COLUMNS.
Now my question is:
can I modify the parameters of the ORACE DB to make it accept Tables and Views with more than 1000 columns, If not, is it possible to make a PL/SQL Function that simulate a table, this function will insert/update/select data from many other small tables (<1000 columns). I want to say a method that make the ORACLE DB acting like if it has a table with a huge number of columns;
I know it's crazy but any idea please.

Compressed tables with more than 255 columns

hi,
Would anyone have a sql to find out compressed tables with more than 255 columns.
Thank you
Jonu

SELECT table_name,
       Count(column_name)
FROM   user_tab_columns utc
WHERE utc.table_name IN (SELECT table_name
                          FROM   user_tables
                          WHERE compression = 'ENABLED')
HAVING Count(column_name) > 255
GROUP BY table_name

Classic table : multiple item in one column

Hi All,
Is it possible when using a classic table to put two db columns in one column item? I tried
concatenating but i can't specifically make the second value to the next line. I tried putting
html tags but messageStyledText just displays the tags, if i use formatted text it doesnt
put column headings, etc. I need some suggestions.
gregg

i used raw text.

How can i export the data to excel which has 2 tables with same number of columns & column names?

Hi everyone, again landed up with a problem.
After trying a lot to do it myself, finally decided to post here..
I have created a form in form builder 6i, in which on clicking a button the data gets exported to excel sheet.
It is working fine with a single table. The problem now is that i am unable to do the same with 2 tables.
Because both the tables have same number of columns & column names.
Below are 2 tables with column names:
Table-1 (MONTHLY_PART_1)
Table-2 (MONTHLY_PART_2)
SL_NO
SL_NO
COMP
COMP
DUE_DATE
DUE_DATE
U-1
U-1
U-2
U-2
U-4
U-4
U-20
U-20
U-25
U-25
Since both the tables have same column names, I'm getting the following error :
Error 402 at line 103, column 4
alias required in SELECT list of cursor to avoid duplicate column names.
So How can i export the data to excel which has 2 tables with same number of columns & column names?
Should i paste the code? Should i post this query in 'SQL and PL/SQL' Forum?
Help me with this please.
Thank You.

You'll have to *alias* your columns, not prefix it with the table names:
$[CHE_TEST@asterix1_impl] r
1 declare
2    cursor cData is
3      with data as (
4        select 1 id, 'test1' val1, 'a' val2 from dual
5        union all
6        select 1 id, '1test' val1, 'b' val2 from dual
7        union all
8        select 2 id, 'test2' val1, 'a' val2 from dual
9        union all
10        select 2 id, '2test' val1, 'b' val2 from dual
11      )
12      select a.id, b.id, a.val1, b.val1, a.val2, b.val2
13      from data a, data b
14      where a.id = b.id
15      and a.val2 = 'a'
16      and b.val2 = 'b';
17 begin
18    for rData in cData loop
19      null;
20    end loop;
21* end;
for rData in cData loop
ERROR at line 18:
ORA-06550: line 18, column 3:
PLS-00402: alias required in SELECT list of cursor to avoid duplicate column names
ORA-06550: line 18, column 3:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
$[CHE_TEST@asterix1_impl] r
1 declare
2    cursor cData is
3      with data as (
4        select 1 id, 'test1' val1, 'a' val2 from dual
5        union all
6        select 1 id, '1test' val1, 'b' val2 from dual
7        union all
8        select 2 id, 'test2' val1, 'a' val2 from dual
9        union all
10        select 2 id, '2test' val1, 'b' val2 from dual
11      )
12      select a.id a_id, b.id b_id, a.val1 a_val1, b.val1 b_val1, a.val2 a_val2, b.val2 b_val2
13      from data a, data b
14      where a.id = b.id
15      and a.val2 = 'a'
16      and b.val2 = 'b';
17 begin
18    for rData in cData loop
19      null;
20    end loop;
21* end;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
cheers

Can I create a table with more than 40 columns ?

Hello,
I need to organize my work with a table and need about 66 columns. I am not very good with Numbers but I know a little bit of Pages. I cannot find a way to create a table with more than 40 columns... Is it hopeless ? (Pages '08 v. 3.0.3)
Thank you all

It's never too late to try to teach users that the Search feature is not only for helpers.
The number of columns allowed in Numbers is not a relevant value when the question is about Pages '08 tables.
I tried to copy a 256 columns Numbers table into a Pages '09 document.
I didn't got a table but values separated by TABs.
I tried to convert this text range in a table and got this clear message :
If I remember well, in Pages '08, the limit is 40 columns.
It seems that you are a specialist of inaccurate responses, but I'm not a moderator so I'm not allowed to urtge you to double check what you wrote before posting.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) vendredi 29 avril 2011 14:57:58
Please :
Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community

How can I sort a table using more than one column in Numbers or in Pages?

How can I sort a table using more than one column in Numbers or in Pages?

Hi Ron,
On the right side of the Toolbar click the Sort and Filter button, then select Sort.
You can then set up a multiple column sort.
Click Add A Column, Specify the sort for that column, Repeat.
Jerry

Error while running spatial queries on a table with more than one geometry.

Hello,
I'm using GeoServer with Oracle Spatial database, and this is a second time I run into some problems because we use tables with more than one geometry.
When GeoServer renders objects with more than one geometry on the map, it creates a query where it asks for objects which one of the two geometries interacts with the query window. This type of query always fails with "End of TNS data channel" error.
We are running Oracle Standard 11.1.0.7.0.
Here is a small script to demonstrate the error. Could anyone confirm that they also have this type of error? Or suggest a fix?
What this script does:
1. Create table object1 with two geometry columns, geom1, geom2.
2. Create metadata (projected coordinate system).
3. Insert a row.
4. Create spacial indices on both columns.
5. Run a SDO_RELATE query on one column. Everything is fine.
6. Run a SDO_RELATE query on both columns. ERROR: "End of TNS data channel"
7. Clean.
CREATE TABLE object1
id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY,
geom1 SDO_GEOMETRY,
geom2 SDO_GEOMETRY
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata (table_name, column_name, srid, diminfo)
VALUES
'OBJECT1',
'GEOM1',
2180,
SDO_DIM_ARRAY
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 400000, 700000, 0.05),
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 300000, 600000, 0.05)
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata (table_name, column_name, srid, diminfo)
VALUES
'OBJECT1',
'GEOM2',
2180,
SDO_DIM_ARRAY
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 400000, 700000, 0.05),
SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 300000, 600000, 0.05)
INSERT INTO object1 VALUES(1, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(550000, 450000, NULL), NULL, NULL));
CREATE INDEX object1_geom1_sidx ON object1(geom1) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
CREATE INDEX object1_geom2_sidx ON object1(geom2) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
SELECT *
FROM object1
WHERE
SDO_RELATE("GEOM1", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE';
SELECT *
FROM object1
WHERE
SDO_RELATE("GEOM1", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE' OR
SDO_RELATE("GEOM2", SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 2180, SDO_POINT_TYPE(500000, 400000, NULL), NULL, NULL), 'MASK=ANYINTERACT') = 'TRUE';
DELETE FROM user_sdo_geom_metadata WHERE table_name = 'OBJECT1';
DROP INDEX object1_geom1_sidx;
DROP INDEX object1_geom2_sidx;
DROP TABLE object1;
Thanks for help.

This error appears in GeoServer and SQLPLUS.
I have set up a completly new database installation to test this error and everything works fine. I tried it again on the previous database but I still get the same error. I also tried to restart the database, but with no luck, the error is still there. I geuss something is wrong with the database installation.
Anyone knows what could cause an error like this "End of TNS data channel"?

Table with column group (one column) - next row is showing on new page instead of below previous row

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for