Takes much time
hi all
When i tries to retrive the data from outline using OLAP outline extractor it takes much time and less data
i dont know whats the reason and where as in razzza i get in fraction of sec but its not format which ima looking for
help appreciated
regards
You may need to make some registry settings, have a look at this post and there is a link to Tim's blog - Re: Extracting large dimension using outline extractor
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/
Similar Messages
-
Query takes much time while sum of yearly bases amount
I have made query on the basis of joing to get payroll data it's woking fine but when we accumulate this on yearly basis while giving parameter from and to date then it takes much time, so how can we optimise this.
please advice.this is query
SELECT paa.assignment_id,MAX(EFFECTIVE_DATE) effective_date,
paypa.business_group_id,paypa.payroll_id,
nvl(SUM(decode(pet.element_type_id,10,decode(pivf.name,'Pay Value',TO_NUMBER(NVL(prrv.result_value, 0))))),0) AMOUNT
FROM pay_assignment_actions paa,
pay_payroll_actions paypa,
pay_run_results prr,
pay_element_types_f pet,
pay_element_classifications pec,
pay_run_result_values prrv,
pay_input_values_f pivf
where paypa.payroll_ACTION_id = paa.payroll_ACTION_id
AND prr.assignment_ACTION_id = paa.assignment_ACTION_id
AND paypa.action_status = 'C'
AND paa.action_status = 'C'
and paypa.action_type in ('Q','R')
AND pet.element_type_id = prr.element_type_id
AND pec.classification_id = pet.classification_id
AND pivf.input_value_id=prrv.input_value_id
AND prr.run_result_id = prrv.run_result_id
AND pivf.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
AND paypa.effective_date BETWEEN pivf.effective_start_date AND pivf.effective_end_date
AND paypa.effective_date BETWEEN pet.effective_start_date AND pet.effective_end_date
AND paypa.effective_date between to_date('01-JUL-2010') AND TO_DATE('30-JUN-2011')
group by paa.assignment_id,paypa.business_group_id,paypa.payroll_id
any idea for this ,how can we improve performance,althoug it's woking fine without using group by function
Edited by: oracle0282 on Mar 31, 2011 11:36 PM -
MacBook Pro takes much time for Shutdown (More than 1 min.)
I have a MacBook Pro, and some weeks ago, it takes much time for shutdown.
I've tried to install the 10.5.2 update, but nothing solves.
My mac takes for shutdown 1 min & 30 seconds every time. I don't understand. Why?
What can I do? I tried to repair permissions and reset the PMU, but the problem still there.
Help me! Please!
Thanks
Sorry, but I'm spanish and it's possible that I've made more mistakes writing in English.Thanks. I tried to dissable an EyeTv option, then EyeConnect don't appears in the Activity Monitor. This is the result:
Now, my MacBook Pro takes only 35 seconds for shutdown. I think is better than yesterdey, but is more than the 5 seconds that you described in the last post. Is 35 seconds a good time? In this 35 seconds, I only can see the background image, without icons and without the finder menu bar. After 35 seconds, Mac is off.
How can I disable iDisk sync? I have a free mac Account, but is expired and then I can't use iDisk, only the name in iChat. But, is iDisk enabled? -
Problem : SELECT from LTAP table takes much time (Sort in Database layer)
Guys,
Im having problem with this select statement. It takes much time just to get single record.
The problem is with accessing the LTAP table and the ORDER BY DESCENDING statement.
The objective of this select statement is to get the non blocked storage bin which is used by latest transfer order number.
If the latest transfer order no storage bin is blocked, then it will loop and get the 2nd latest transfer order no's storage bin and
checks whether it blocked or not. It will keep looping.
The secondary index has been created but the it still taking much time (3 minutes for 10K records in LTAP)
Secondary Indexes:
a) LTAP_M ->MANDTLGNUM PQUIT MATNR
b)LTAP_L ->LGNUM PQUIT VLTYP VLPLA
Below is the coding.
******************Start of DEVK9A14JW**************************
SELECT ltaptanum ltapnlpla ltap~wdatu INTO (ltap-tanum, ltap-nlpla, ltap-wdatu)
UP TO 1 ROWS
FROM ltap INNER JOIN lagp "DEVK9A15OA
ON lagplgnum = ltaplgnum
AND lagplgtyp = ltapnltyp
AND lagplgpla = ltapnlpla
WHERE lagp~skzue = ' '
AND ltap~pquit = 'X'
AND ltap~matnr = ls_9001_scrn-matnr
AND ltap~lgort = ls_9001_scrn-to_lgort
AND ltap~lgnum = ls_9001_scrn-lgnum
AND ltap~nltyp = ls_9001_scrn-nltyp
ORDER BY tanum DESCENDING.
ENDSELECT.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
ls_9001_scrn-nlpla = ltap-nlpla.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
******************End of DEVK9A14JW**************************> Im having problem with this select statement. It takes much time just to get single record.
This is not true. Together with the ORDER BY the UP TO 1 ROWS does not read 1 record but prepare all records, orders them and return one record, i.e. the largest in sort order.
You must check what you need, either you need the largest record, then this can be your only possible solution.
If you need only one recoird then the ORDER BY does not make sense.
If you need the single largest record, then sometimes the aggregate function MAX can be an alternative.
I did not look at the index support, this can always be a problem.
Siegfried -
Primavera Contract managment take much time when open large PDF files.
Dears,
i have a big problem!
i made integration between the PCM and sharepoint 2010 and make migration from the file system to sharepoint.
the sharepoint database reach 355GB
after that unfortunately, when i try to open large pdf attachment through PCM(Primavera Contract Managmnet) it take much time then whan was opened from the file server.
i made everthing upgrde the RAM and processor but the problem still exists.
please help!
Edited by: 948060 on Sep 19, 2012 1:48 AMwe start store attachment on 2007. all of these files are migrated to sharepoint 2010 now on the staging enviroment.
but, we faced the performance issue as mentioned above.
the large files (begin 5MB) take a lot of time to open through the PCM -
Attach native thread to jvm takes much time
Hello everyone,
I attach a native thread to the jvm. It works but it takes about 10 seconds. I do not understand why and I would like to reduce this time to 1 or 2 seconds.
I use a native thread to get keyboard events (a hook) to capture a screen area (with Robot class).
Samples program :
Abstract class used by the thread :
class CATSrvThreadHandler
public:
CATSrvThreadHandler();
enum
enableCode = 1,
updateCode = 2,
disableCode = 3
virtual ~CATSrvThreadHandler();
virtual void doEnable() = 0;
virtual void doUpdate() = 0;
Herited class : class CATSrvScreenIndicator:public CATSrvThreadHandler
CATSrvScreenIndicator CATSrvScreenIndicator::extract(JNIEnv env, jobject object)
// Get field ID
jfieldID l_handlerId = env->GetFieldID(env->GetObjectClass(object), "_handler", "I");
// Get field
CATSrvScreenIndicator l_handler = (CATSrvScreenIndicator )env->GetIntField(object, l_handlerId);
return l_handler;
// This method is called by Java code to activate the thread
void CATSrvScreenIndicator::enable(JNIEnv *env)
g_DesktopIndicatorThread.MakeSureThreadIsUp(env);
// Takes too much time !!!! (about 5 seconds)
while(!PostThreadMessage(g_DesktopIndicatorThread, WM_DESKTOPINDICATOR, enableCode, (LPARAM)this))
Sleep(0);
The thread class :
CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::CATSrvScreenCaptureThread()
m_env = NULL;
m_thread = 0;
m_vm = NULL;
m_handlerCount = 0;
void CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::MakeSureThreadIsUp(JNIEnv *env)
if(!m_thread)
// --> Get VM
env->GetJavaVM(&m_vm);
// --> Start "native" thread
CreateThread(NULL, 0, ThreadProc, this, 0, &m_thread);
DWORD WINAPI CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::ThreadProc(LPVOID lpParameter)
CATSrvScreenCaptureThread l_this=(CATSrvScreenCaptureThread)lpParameter;
// --> Attach the thread to the VM, takes too much time !!!! (about 5 seconds)
l_this->m_vm->AttachCurrentThread((JNIEnv**)&l_this->m_env, NULL);
MSG msg;
while(GetMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0))
Thanks for any information !It's ellapse time with no other application running
between this method call and tray icon appearing int
the taskbar.
Now I am not sure I understand the question.
To time how long a method call takes you must time the method - not just the code that the method runs in. And you need to use a timer and not just guess about it. -
When we start the laptop, it takes so much time to boot..
Dear Customer,
Welcome and Thank You for posting your query on HP Support Forum
You can try the steps mentioned below:
Step 01. Click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
Step 02. Please type "temp" [Without Quotes] and press Enter
Step 03. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
Step 04. Again click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
Step 05. Please type "%temp%" [Without Quotes] and press Enter
Step 06. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
Step 07. Click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
Step 08. Please type "prefetch"[Without Quotes] and press Enter
Step 09. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
Step 10. On your desktop, Please right click on "Recycle Bin" Icon and Click on Empty Recycle Bin.
Click Yes if you get a prompt to delete everything permanently
Step 10. Click on the Start Button and open the Control Panel
Step 11. Please open "Programs and Features / Add or Remove Programs"
Step 12. Please uninstall if you have any unwanted Softwares from here
Note: If your Notebook prompts to reboot/restart when you uninstall, go ahead with it.
Once your Notebook comes back please continue the troubleshooting again
Step 13. Please Turn OFF the Notebook
Step 14. Un-plug the Power/AC Adapter and also remove the battery too
Step 15. Press and Hold the Power Button on the Notebook for a full minute
Step 16. Now let's re-insert the battery back in and plug back the Power/AC Adapter
Step 17. Start the Notebook and Now reset the Internet Explorer browser
Hope this helps, for any further queries reply to the post and feel free to join us again
**Click the White Thumbs Up Button on the right to say Thanks**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.
Thank You,
K N R K
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP -
Primavera Contract managment take much time when open large files.
Dear All,
i need to stop or configure the Download File In Chunks when PCM get file from sharepoint because it take large time to downlaod the file.
the deafult is 2048 and i need to increase this value or disable it.
thankswe start store attachment on 2007. all of these files are migrated to sharepoint 2010 now on the staging enviroment.
but, we faced the performance issue as mentioned above.
the large files (begin 5MB) take a lot of time to open through the PCM -
Query output takes much time to download
Hi Experts,
I am running an query in SQ01 and getting output of 40000 row. The query execution is very faster but when I try to download the output to local file it take lot of time to download. Initially it was giving RUN TIME error then I increased the rdisp/max_wprun_time to 1200, now it is saving to the local file but takes 30 minutes.
So, can anybody tell me if there is any way to resolve this issue?
Note: The system performance is excellent and this is a QAS system
Regards,
NileshHi,
You can't really do much here, excpet trying to download the output in another format or maybe trying to split your query to fetch less no. of records.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Varun -
My ipod takes much time to open
hi , my name is omar ,,,i bought my ipod tuch 3rd generation 32 giga from like 2 months and i have updated to the new software but i found that it takes like 1 min to open ,,is it normall ???? ,,,,,when i bought it ,it was very fast ,anny help please
I just measure that time on my 4G and it took 35-40 seconds. Your time seems comparable with my time. I myself would not be concerned.
-
Reinstalling mountain liom on macbook air 2012 takes much time?
Is This normal? Im currently reinstalling os on my secondhand macbook air 2012. It will took almost 2 days. Will this be just fine? Letting the macbook turned on for 2 days? Does this wont overheat the macbook? Or damage its parts?
Or this wont really take 44 hrs. Im also using the wifi connection, my normal download rate is 80-120 kbs/secs in when downloading in safari.
Or what if ill cancel this and connect to another network connection but im also worrying if download stops.You need to be able to download just over 4 GB. If your connection speed is only 80-120 Kbps, that's quite slow and it will take a long time. Of course, it also may not take quite as long as it's predicting... Early time estimates in things like that can be quite inaccurate.
You should be able to safely cancel and try on a faster network, or you could just leave it running. The latter will not cause the machine to overheat unless the machine has a hardware problem already. -
Update query takes much time to execute
Hi Experts,
I need help regarding performance of the query.
update TEST_TAB
set fail=1, msg='HARD'
where id in (
select src.id from TEST_TAB src
inner join TEST_TAB l_1 on src.email=l_1.email and l_1.database_id=335090 and l_1.msg='HARD' and l_1.fail=1
inner join TEST_TAB l_2 on src.email=l_2.email and l_2.database_id=338310 and l_2.msg='HARD' and l_2.fail=1
inner join TEST_TAB l_3 on src.email=l_3.email and l_3.database_id=338470 and l_3.msg='HARD' and l_3.fail=1
where src.database_id=1111111;
This query is running for too long, takes >1 hour and it updates 26000 records.
But, if we run inner select query
select src.id from TEST_TAB src
inner join TEST_TAB l_1 on src.email=l_1.email and l_1.database_id=335090 and l_1.msg='HARD' and l_1.fail=1
inner join TEST_TAB l_2 on src.email=l_2.email and l_2.database_id=338310 and l_2.msg='HARD' and l_2.fail=1
inner join TEST_TAB l_3 on src.email=l_3.email and l_3.database_id=338470 and l_3.msg='HARD' and l_3.fail=1
where src.database_id=1111111
It takes <1 minute to execute.
Please give me suggetions in the update query so that i will improve performance of the query.SELECT src.id FROM lead src
inner join lead l_1 ON src.email=l_1.email AND
l_1.database_id=335090 AND l_1.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_1.failed=1
inner join lead l_2 ON src.email=l_2.email AND
l_2.database_id=338310 AND l_2.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_2.failed=1
inner join lead l_3 ON src.email=l_3.email AND
l_3.database_id=338470 AND l_3.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_3.failed=1
WHERE src.database_id=264170;
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop
SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS 1 10453
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 1 32 27
NESTED LOOPS 1 130 10453
HASH JOIN 1 98 10426
HASH JOIN 199 12 K 6950
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 202 6 K 3476
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 94 K 3 M 3473
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 202 6 K 3476
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_IDX_4 24 3 Update for one row.
UPDATE lead SET failed=1, bounce_msg_t='HARD'
WHERE id IN (SELECT src.id FROM lead src
inner join lead l_1 ON src.email=l_1.email AND
l_1.database_id=335090 AND l_1.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_1.failed=1
inner join lead l_2 ON src.email=l_2.email AND
l_2.database_id=338310 AND l_2.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_2.failed=1
inner join lead l_3 ON src.email=l_3.email AND
l_3.database_id=338470 AND l_3.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_3.failed=1
WHERE src.database_id=264170
AND ROWNUM=1)
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop
UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS 1 10456
UPDATE LEAD
NESTED LOOPS 1 32 10456
VIEW VW_NSO_1 1 13 10453
SORT UNIQUE 1 130
COUNT STOPKEY
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 1 32 27
NESTED LOOPS 1 130 10453
HASH JOIN 1 98 10426
HASH JOIN 199 12 K 6950
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 202 6 K 3476
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 94 K 3 M 3473
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 202 6 K 3476
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I 94 K 259
INDEX RANGE SCAN LEAD_IDX_4 24 3
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID LEAD 1 19 2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN LEADS_PK 1 1 -
Query takes too much time in fetching last records.
Hi,
I am using oracle 8.1 and trying to execute a SQL statement, it takes few minutes and display records.
When trying to fetch all the records, it is fast up to some level and takes much time to fetch last record.
Ex: If total records = 16336 , then it fetches records faster up to 16300 and takes app.500 sec to fetch last 36 records.
Could you kindly let me know the reason.
I have copied the explain plan below for your reference.Please let me know if anything is required.
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = RULE 4046 8 4048
NESTED LOOPS OUTER 4046 8 4048
NESTED LOOPS OUTER 4030 8 2952
FILTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER 4014 8 1728
NESTED LOOPS 3998 8 936
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP CUSTOMER_ORDER_TAB 3966 8 440
INDEX RANGE SCAN IFSAPP CUSTOMER_ORDER_1_IX 108 8
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_TAB 4 30667 1901354
INDEX RANGE SCAN IFSAPP CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_PK 3 30667
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_TAB 2 2000 198000
INDEX RANGE SCAN IFSAPP PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_1_IDX 1 2000
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP PWR_CONS_PARCEL_TAB 1 2000 222000
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN IFSAPP PWR_CONS_PARCEL_PK 2000
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_TAB 1 2000 84000
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN IFSAPP CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_PK 2000
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IFSAPP PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_TAB 2 20 2740
INDEX RANGE SCAN IFSAPP PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_IX1 1 20 Thanks.We are using PL/SQL Developer tool. The time what we have mentioned in the post is approximated time.
Apologies for not mentioning these details in previous thread.Let it be approximate time but how did you arrive at that time? When a query fetches records how did you derived that one portion is fetched in x and the remaining in y time limit?
I would suggest this could be some issue with PL/SQL Developer (Never used this tool by myself) But for performance testing i would suggest you to use SQL Plus. Thats the best tool to test performance. -
Sometimes RSCRM ABAP program is taking much time
Hi,
I am working in SAP BW 3.1 system. We have one RSCRM Abap program to send the data to Data stage team.
We kept this process in process chain. Some times it takes much time. If i cancel that job and repeat this process it will complete in few minutes.
Please suggest me what would be the reason.
ThanksYou may want to take a look at the following OSS Notes:
[OSS Note 605213 - RSCRM: Performance|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=605213]
[OSS Note 989461 - RSCRM:code for improving performance in VALUES_READ|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=989461]
[OSS Note 1137302 - RSCRM: Memory usage optimization|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1137302] -
SELECT statement takes long time
Hi All,
In the following code, if the T_QMIH-EQUNR contains blank or space values ,SELECT statement takes longer time to acess the data from OBJK table. If it T_QMIH-EQUNR contains values other than blank, performance is good and it fetches data very fast.
Already we have indexes for EQUNR in OBJK table.
Only for blank entries , it takes much time.Can anybody tell why it behaves for balnk entries?
if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
REFRESH T_OBJK.
SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
WHERE OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
Thanks
AjayHi
You can use the field QMIH-QMNUM with OBJK-IHNUM
in QMIH table, EQUNR is not primary key, it will have multiple entries
so to improve the performance use one dummy internal table for QMIH and sort it on EQUNR
delete adjacent duplicates from d_qmih and use the same in for all entries
this will improve the performance.
Also use the fields in sequence of the index and primary keys also in select
if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
REFRESH T_OBJK.
SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
WHERE IHNUM = T_QMIH-QMNUM
OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
try this and let me know
regards
Shiva
Maybe you are looking for
-
Sync.me application not working
the application "sync.me" was working properly i removed the application "sync.me" and i reinstall it from my new apple id the application is not working when i opened it it close directly
-
I am getting an object reference not found error when trying to view the version history of any list item within my web application, as well as view or edit any list item properties in general. Below is what the ULS log generates when I try to view
-
I am using interop acrobat dll in one of my client , when trying to open a pdf file in acrobat X the following message appears : ''To view the flash technology content in this PDF, please install the version of flash player that supports Adobe reader
-
After Upgrading to Mavericks I am having Random Crashes
Hello All.... I upgraded my MPB (MacBookPro6,2) to OS X 10.9.4 (Mavericks) and ever since then I am experience random crashes. Sometimes when I open something or just run my finger across my trackpad. It happens at the most unwelcome time. This machi
-
Create Organization Data programatically
I am using ALBPM 5.7 Studio and trying to create Organization data programatically - OU, Participant, Role etc. I am able to fetch data but not able to create OU. For the following code DirOrganizationalUnit dirOrgUnit; dirOrganizationalUnit = dirOrg