Taking too much of time in po change mode

Dear all
please let me know that whay system taking too much time in p.o. change mode and when p.o. in change mode while clicking the condition tab it takes lot of time to open
regrds
s.m.pandit

Hi Pandit,
Tell us more about your situation. What version of SAP you use and recently have applied any patch to your system? Also have look at t.code ST03N to analyze the performance of your system.
Regards
Melih

Similar Messages

How to tune the query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time...

how to reduce the execution time for the below query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time....
SELECT
B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,
SUM(DP_AD_CURR_BAL*D.ISIN_CLOSE_PRICE) Qty,
B.DP_NET_WORTH,
B.CMN_DP_FLAG,
B.RESTRAIN_TYPE ,
B.LETT_GENR_DATE,
E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH
FROM DPMADV0 A, PABRNCHDTLP0 B, PABANKCCYP0 D,PADPNETWORTHDTLP0 E,
(SELECT CID_NUMB FROM CFCUSTMASTD0
WHERE SUB_TYPE NOT IN (1,2,5,6,7,28,29,30,31,40,41,48,49,50,57,83)) C
WHERE A.DP_AD_BR_NBR = B.BRNCH_NUMB
AND A.DP_AD_CCY_CDE = D.CCY_ALPHA_CODE
AND A.DP_AD_ACCT_NBR = C.CID_NUMB
AND E.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE = B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE
AND SUBSTR(B.BRNCH_NUMB,1,3) like SUBSTR(:hvBrnchNumb,1,3)
AND ((B.DP_TYPE IN (2) AND B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE IN (10, 11)) or
(B.DP_TYPE IN (3) and B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE=11 ) )
AND B.DEL_FLAG = 'N'
AND B.DP_STATUS = 'A'
AND D.ISIN_STATUS = 'A'
GROUP BY B.DP_NET_WORTH,B.RESTRAIN_TYPE,B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH,B.CMN_DP_FLAG,B.LETT_GENR_DATE;

Hi,
please produce a plan with rowsource statistics (if not sure how, follow instructions in http://savvinov.com/2012/09/24/a-sqlplus-script-for-diagnosing-poor-sql-plans/) and post it using tags to preserve formatting.
Best regards,
Nikolay
P.S. I also suggest that you work on your open threads:
Handle:      946903
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Jul 16, 2012
Total Posts:      11
Total Questions:      5 (5 unresolved)

How to uninstall Mcafee anti-virus from my machine because of machine bootup is taking too much of time for usage?

Hi,
How to uninstall Mcafee anti-virus from my machine because of machine bootup is taking too much of time for usage? so that i moved all mcafee related file to trash but while machine boot up mcafee showing and asking Authentication so any one give me better suggestion on this.
Thanks in advance,
Suresh Balakrishnan

Hi All,
i uninstalled AV successfully using as below mentioned links:
Moved to VirusScan Other where hopefully an expert can help you.
Until they do I Googled 'How to uninstall VirusScan 8.6 for MAC' and got this as one of the many choices: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB54975
There are also uninstall instructions in the User Guide: https://kc.mcafee.com/resources/sites/MCAFEE/content/live/PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION/ 22000/PD22134/en_US/VirusScan%20for%20Mac%208.6.1%20User%20Guide%20Addendum.pdf
By condemning files to the bin you may have scotched any automated method of removal but I will defer to the experts on that.
Thanks lot,
Suresh Balakrishann

Ns-slapd process taking too much cpu time

Dear All,
I am currently using directory server 6.2 and it comes out that the ns-slapd process is taking almost 95% of cpu time. This goes for 2 to 3 hours then it comes back to normal. This is happening every alternate day. I have monitored the log but could not find any suspected activity which may be causing this.
Is this something vulnerable in 6.2?
Any tunings that i should undergo?
Regards,
Scotty

Dear Ludovic,
i am finding alot of the below unindexed searches:
[30/Oct/2007:16:30:27 +0400] - WARNING<20805> - Backend Database - conn=-1 op=0 msgId=-1 - search is not indexed base='cn=changelog' filter='(&(nsroledn=un=xxcccvvvcb823f7,ou=gdf016926,ou=people,ou=2005,ou=r444,ou=mail,o=kas.ac,o=pblebs,o=pab)(|(objectclass=*)(objectclass=ldapsubentry)))' scope='sub'
and prstat is showing
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/LWPID
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 32 0 1:44:10 3.6% ns-slapd/101
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 32 0 2:40:40 3.6% ns-slapd/84
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 33 0 0:55:00 3.5% ns-slapd/97
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 33 0 1:35:56 3.4% ns-slapd/57
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 33 0 0:24:45 3.4% ns-slapd/94
13433 root 4357M 2727M run 43 0 2:06:04 3.1% ns-slapd/86
and even more
Would it be of the unindexed searches?
Thanks,
Scorry

OEM agent taking too much db time

Hi,
In my db, the OEMAgent was always the top consumer of CPU and IO times (because of the dynamic sql code?). The violating SP is attached at the end. For some reason, it is getting called thousands of times.
Is this normally? What is the reason? How can this be alleviated?
/* OracleOEM */ DECLARE l_log_mode VARCHAR2(32); l_flashback_on VARCHAR2(32); l_flash_recovery_area VARCHAR2(512); l_usable_area NUMBER; l_oldest_flashback_time VARCHAR2(512); TYPE data_cursor_type IS REF CURSOR; data_cursor data_cursor_type; v_db_version VARCHAR2(10); db_version_102 CONSTANT VARCHAR2(10) := '10.2.0.0.0'; BEGIN -- Database version SELECT LPAD(version, 10, '0') INTO v_db_version FROM v$instance; -- Log Mode, Flashback On SELECT log_mode, flashback_on INTO l_log_mode, l_flashback_on FROM v$database; -- Flash Recovery Area SELECT value INTO l_flash_recovery_area FROM v$parameter WHERE name='db_recovery_file_dest'; -- Usable Flash Recovery Area (10gR2) l_usable_area := NULL; IF (v_db_version >= db_version_102) THEN IF (length(l_flash_recovery_area) > 0) THEN EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'SELECT (100 - sum(percent_space_used)) + sum(percent_space_reclaimable) FROM v$flash_recovery_area_usage' INTO l_usable_area; END IF; END IF; -- Oldest Flashback Time BEGIN SELECT to_char(oldest_flashback_time, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') INTO l_oldest_flashback_time FROM v$flashback_database_log; EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN l_oldest_flashback_time := ''; END; OPEN data_cursor FOR SELECT l_log_mode, l_flash_recovery_area, l_usable_area, l_flashback_on, l_oldest_flashback_time from dual; :1 := data_cursor; END;

Check the Collection frequency of the metrics. E.g the space usage related metrics (tablespace etc). You will find that is is set to every 15 secs by default. You can reduce the frequency to ease the load on the CPU

Why is query taking too much time ?

Hi gurus,
I have a table name test which has 100000 records in it,now the question i like to ask is.
when i query select * from test ; no proble with responce time, but when the next day i fire the above query it is taking too much of time say 3 times.i would also like to tell you that everything is ok in respect of tuning,the db is properly tuned, network is tuned properly. what could be the hurting factor here ??
take care
All expertise.

Here is a small test on my windows PC.
oracle 9i Rel1.
Table : emp_test
number of records : 42k
set autot trace exp stat
15:29:13 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
41665 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.06 ==> response time.
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2951 consistent gets
178 physical reads
0 redo size
1268062 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
31050 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2779 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
41665 rows processed
15:29:40 jaffar@PRIMEDB> delete from emp_test where deptno = 10;
24998 rows deleted.
Elapsed: 00:00:10.06
15:31:19 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
16667 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.09 ==> response time
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1289 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
218615 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
12724 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1113 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
16667 rows processed

Taking too much time in Rules(DTP Schedule run)

Hi,
I am Scheduling the DTP which have filters to minimize the load data.
when i run the DTP it is taking too much time in the "rules" (i can see the DTP monitor ststus package by pakage and step by step like "Start routine" "rules" and "End Routine")
here it is consuming too much time in Rules Mapping.
what is the problem and any solutions please...
regards,
sree

Hi,
Time taken at "rules" depends on the complexity involved there in ur routine. If it is a complex calculation it will take time.
Also check ur DTP batch settings, ie how many no. of background processes used to perform DTP, Job class.
U can find these :
goto DTP, select goto menu and select "Settings for Batch Manager".
In the screen increase no of Processes from 3 to higher no(max 9).
ChaNGE job class to 'A'.
If ur DTP is still running , cancel it ie Kill the DTP, delete from the Cube,
Change these settings and run ur DTP one more time.
U can observer the difference.
Reddy

Full DTP taking too much time to load

Hi All ,
I am facing an issue where a DTP is taking too much time to load data from DSO to Cube via PC and also while manually running it.
There are 6 such similar DTP's which load data for different countries(different DSO's and Cubes as source and target respectively) for last 7 days based on GI Date. All the DTP's are pulling almost same no. of records and finish within 25-30 min. But only one DTP takes around 3 hours. The problem started couple of days back.
I have change the Parallel processes from 3->4->5 and packet size from 50,000->10,000->1.00.000 but no improvement. Also want to mention that all the source DSO's and target Cubes have the same structure. All the transformations have Field Routines and End Routines.
Can you all please share some pointers which can help.
Thanks
Prateek

HI Raman ,
This is what I get when I check the report. Can this be causing issues as 2 rows have % >= 100
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC00069     rows:      1.484    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006C     rows: 15.059.600    ratio:        103 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006D     rows:        242    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006P     rows:         66    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006T     rows:        156    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/DETVC0006U     rows:          2    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/EETVC0006      rows: 14.680.700    ratio:        100 %
ETVC0006           /BIC/FETVC0006      rows:          0    ratio:          0 %
ETVC0007           rows: 13.939.200    density:              0,0 %

List view item display time is taking too much

Hi,
I am working in a sharepoint2013 project. In our project , list view item display time is taking too much in IE8 sp2013 64 bit environment. Can anyone help me to resolve this issue?
Thanks,
Nabhendu

Hi Nabhendu,
We had something similar with our SP2013 and IE8 32-bit. It seems that IE8 was in Compatible mode which make it IE7, which is unsupported by SP2013 due to HTML5.
Issue : List view especially datasheet view which has been moved from ActiveX to HTML5 had very slow response on SP2013 and IE8 32-bit.
Resolution : Try Chrome and see if its CSS/Masterpage or SP2013 issues performance issue.
We deployed masterpage and css which was used in our SP2007 site with minor changes, but later we figured out that we need to make major changes in order to work with IE8 and SP2013.
Try Indexing Columns.
check how many look up columns are used.
Hopefully that may help you..
Thanks,
Parth
Thanks and Regards, Parth

Client import taking too much time

hi all,
i am importing a client , i it has complete copy table 19,803 of 19,803 but for last four hours its status is processing
scc3
Target Client           650
Copy Type               Client Import Post-Proc
Profile                 SAP_CUST
Status                  Processing...
User                    SAP*
Start on                24.05.2009 / 15:08:03
Last Entry on           24.05.2009 / 15:36:25
Current Action:         Post Processing
- Last Exit Program    RGBCFL01
Transport Requests
- Client-Specific       PRDKT00004
- Texts                 PRDKX00004
Statistics for this Run
- No. of Tables             19803 of     19803
- Deleted Lines                 7
- Copied Lines                  0
sm50
1 DIA 542           Running Yes             SAPLTHFB 650 SAP*
7 BGD 4172   Running Yes 11479 RGTBGD23 650 SAP* Sequential Read     D010INC
sm66
Server No. Type PID Status Reason Sem Start Error CPU Time   User Report   Action          Table
prdsap_PRD_00 7 BTC 4172 Running   Yes    11711 SAP* RGTBGD23 Sequential Read D010INC
plz guide me why it is taking too much time , while it has finished most of the things
best regard
Khan

The import is in post processing. It digs through all the documents and adapts them to the new client. Most of the tables in the application area have a "MANDT" (= client) field which needs to be changed. Depending of the size of the client this can take a huge amount of time.
You can try to improve the speed by updating the table statistics for table D010INC.
Markus

Delta Sync taking too much time on refreshing of tables

Hi,
I am working on Smart Service Manager 3.0. I have come across a scenario where the delta sync is taking too much time.
It is required that if we update the stock quantity then the stock should be updated instantaneously.
To do this we have to refresh 4 stock tables at every sync so that the updated quantity is reflected in the device.
This is taking a lot of time (3 to 4 min) which is highly unacceptable from user perspective.
Please could anyone suggest something so that only those table get refreshed upon which the action is carried out.
For eg: CTStock table should get refreshed only If i transfer a stock and get updated accordingly
Not on any other scenario like the changing status from accept to driving or any thing other than stocks.
Thanks,
Star
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Hi fiontan,
Thanks a lot for the response!!!
Yeah!! I kow it's a lotta code, but i thought it'd be more informative if the whole function was quoted.
I'm in fact using the PrintWriter to wrap the BufferedWriter but am not using the print() method.
Does it save any time by using the print() method??
The place where the delay is occurring is the wile loop shown below:
            while(allitems.hasMoreElements()){
            String aRow = "";
                XDItem item = (XDItem)allitems.nextElement();
                for(int i =0 ; i < props.length; i++){
                     String value = item.getStringValue(props);
     if(value == null || value.equalsIgnoreCase("null"))
          value = "";
                         if(i == 0)
                              aRow = value;
                         else
                              aRow += ("\t" + value);
startTime1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("time here is--before-writing to buffer --out.flush() done: " +startTime1);
bufferWrt.write(aRow.toCharArray());
out.flush();//added by rosmon to check extra time taken for extraction//
bufferWrt.flush();//added by rosmon to check extra time taken for extraction//
bufferWrt.newLine();
startTime2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("time here is--after-writing to buffer : " +startTime2);
What exactly happens is that after a few loops it just seems to sleep for around 20 seconds and then again starts off and ............it goes on till the records are done.
Please do lemme know if you have any idea as to why this is happening !!!!! This bug is giving me the scare.
thanks in advance

BAPI Function taking too much time

Hi,
One BAPI function BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
taking too much time to process the data. do we have any alternative to reduce the time taken by the BAPI function ?
like by using any SAP Notes or any other alternative function or by any other way.
Thanks and regards,
Shailendra

HI,
Please apply the OSS Note 830717. I applied this note and ran transaction code FBZ0 and the "withholding tax code" changed from XX to 03.
Reward if helpful

ACCTIT table Taking too much time

Hi,
In SE16: ACCTIT table i gave the G/L account no after that i executed in my production its taking too much time for to show the result.
Thanku

Hi,
Here iam sending details of technical settings.
Name                 ACCTIT                          Transparent Table
Short text            Compressed Data from FI/CO Document
Last Change        SAP              10.02.2005
Status                 Active           Saved
Data class         APPL1   Transaction data, transparent tables
Size category      4       Data records expected: 24,000 to 89,000
Thanku

Sites Taking too much time to open and shows error

hi,
i've setup sharepoint 2013 environement correctly and created a site collection everything was working fine but suddenly now when i am trying to open that site collection or central admin site it's taking too much time to open a page but most of the time
does not open any page or central admin site and shows following error
event i go to logs folder under 15 hive but nothing useful found please tell me why it takes about 10-12 minutes to open a site or any page and then shows above shown error.

This usually happens if you are low on hardware requirements. Check whether your machine confirms with the required software and hardware requirements.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262485.aspx
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/58370/minimum-real-world-system-requirements-for-sharepoint-2013
Please remember to up-vote or mark the reply as answer if you find it helpful.

Taking too much time to load application

Hi,
I have deployed a j2ee application on oracle 10g version 10.1.2.0.2. But the application is taking too much time to load. After loading ,everything works fast.
I have another 10g server (same version) in which the same application is loading very fast.
When I checked the apache error logs found this :-
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] oc4j_socket_recvfull timed out
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] (4)Interrupted system call: MOD_OC4J_0038: Receiving data from oc4j exceeded the configured "Timeout" value and the error code is 4.
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] MOD_OC4J_0054: Failed to call network routine to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] MOD_OC4J_0033: Failed to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] MOD_OC4J_0078: Network connection errors happened to host: lawdb.keralalawsect.org and port: 12501 while receiving the first response from oc4j. This request is recoverable.
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] MOD_OC4J_0121: Failed to service request with network worker: home_15 and it is not recoverable.
[Thu Apr 26 09:17:31 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89128867058,1] MOD_OC4J_0013: Failed to call destination: home's service() to service the request.
[Thu Apr 26 11:36:36 2007] [notice] FastCGI: process manager initialized (pid 21177)
[Thu Apr 26 11:36:37 2007] [notice] Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.2.0.2 Oracle-HTTP-Server configured -- resuming normal operations
[Thu Apr 26 11:36:37 2007] [notice] Accept mutex: fcntl (Default: sysvsem)
[Thu Apr 26 11:36:37 2007] [warn] long lost child came home! (pid 9124)
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0015: recv() returns 0. There has no message available to be received and oc4j has gracefully (orderly) closed the connection.
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0054: Failed to call network routine to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0033: Failed to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0078: Network connection errors happened to host: lawdb.keralalawsect.org and port: 12501 while receiving the first response from oc4j. This request is recoverable.
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0184: Failed to find an oc4j process for destination: home
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0145: There is no oc4j process (for destination: home) available to service request.
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0119: Failed to get an oc4j process for destination: home
[Thu Apr 26 11:39:51 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 80547835731,1] MOD_OC4J_0013: Failed to call destination: home's service() to service the request.
[Thu Apr 26 11:46:33 2007] [notice] FastCGI: process manager initialized (pid 21726)
[Thu Apr 26 11:46:34 2007] [notice] Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.2.0.2 Oracle-HTTP-Server configured -- resuming normal operations
[Thu Apr 26 11:46:34 2007] [notice] Accept mutex: fcntl (Default: sysvsem)
[Thu Apr 26 11:46:34 2007] [warn] long lost child came home! (pid 21182)
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] oc4j_socket_recvfull timed out
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] (4)Interrupted system call: MOD_OC4J_0038: Receiving data from oc4j exceeded the configured "Timeout" value and the error code is 4.
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] MOD_OC4J_0054: Failed to call network routine to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] MOD_OC4J_0033: Failed to receive an ajp13 message from oc4j.
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] MOD_OC4J_0078: Network connection errors happened to host: lawdb.keralalawsect.org and port: 12501 while receiving the first response from oc4j. This request is recoverable.
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] MOD_OC4J_0121: Failed to service request with network worker: home_15 and it is not recoverable.
[Thu Apr 26 11:53:32 2007] [error] [client 10.1.20.9] [ecid: 89138452752,1] MOD_OC4J_0013: Failed to call destination: home's service() to service the request.
Please HELP ME...

Hi this is what the solution given by your link
A.1.6 Connection Timeouts Through a Stateful Firewall Affect System Performance
Problem
To improve performance the mod_oc4j component in each Oracle HTTP Server process maintains open TCP connections to the AJP port within each OC4J instance it sends requests to.
In situations where a firewall exists between OHS and OC4J, packages sent via AJP are rejected if the connections can be idle for periods in excess of the inactivity timeout of stateful firewalls.
However, the AJP socket is not closed; as long as the socket remains open, the worker thread is tied to it and is never returned to the thread pool. OC4J will continue to create more threads, and will eventually exhaust system resources.
Solution
The OHS TCP connection must be kept "alive" to avoid firewall timeout issues. This can be accomplished using a combination of OC4J configuration parameters and Apache runtime properties.
Set the following parameters in the httpd.conf or mod_oc4j.conf configuration files. Note that the value of Oc4jConnTimeout sets the length of inactivity, in seconds, before the session is considered inactive.
Oc4jUserKeepalive on
Oc4jConnTimeout 12000 (or a similar value)
Also set the following AJP property at OC4J startup to enable OC4J to close AJP sockets in the event that a connection between OHS and OC4J is dropped due to a firewall timeout:
ajp.keepalive=true
For example:
java -Dajp.keepalive=true -jar oc4j.jar
Please tell me where or which file i should put the option
java -Dajp.keepalive=true -jar oc4j.jar ??????/

Taking too much of time in po change mode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for