Talent Management - Objective weightage

Hi,
Now, we are in 11.5.10.2 FP K RUP1.
Assume that, I am setting 4 objectives. Each objective has some weightage value, (Say objective 1 is 30, Objective 2 is 40, Objective 3 is 15, Objective 4 is 15). So, here, the total weightage for all objective is 100%. If the user enters more than 100%, it should show an error.
Note: I have added 0,5,10...100 in the lookup HR_WPM_WEIGHTING.
Also, I would like to know the difference between weightage scale (HR_WPM_WEIGHTING) lookup and "Target value" under Measurement tab in Update Objective page.
Thanks in advance.

Yes, that is essentially what I was suggesting. I'm not a Fast Formula expert, and I know there are limitations with them, but the concept was to store the weighting factor outside the FF and to read the data and process it inside the FF. The objectives and competencies rating values are going to be configured through a rating scale, so that seemed like a good place for the weighting factor.
Remember too, that the seeded weighting values are lookups, and that you have a code, meaning and description, plus a context sensitive DFF so you could easily store the weighting value in any one of those.
Regards
Tim

Similar Messages

Talent Management Objective Setting

Hi
Employee is setting the objective, it goes to supervisor for approval. Aprpaisal is not started at this time. After got approved, the employee's supervisor has changed. Now the appraisal has started, who is going to appraise this employee's appraisal? (whether old manager or new manager?)
Thanks in advance

whoever is the new manager should get to appraise it. to achieve this set the new supervisor in the HRMS record and check. to be safe, republish the plan everyday also.

Talent Management - Objective Setting Aprpoval - One more Level

Hi,
Objective Settings to be approved by both immediate manager and the second higher manager. But, now, only the immediate manager can approve it. I read the doc id Note:550338.1. But, is there any workaround for this? Can we attach custom workflow to this? so that it goes to second higher manager for approval?
Thanks in advance

Hi
We have had this discussion outside the forum, but I have added my comments here in case they are useful to others.
I have read note 550338.1 and I think you would wait a long time for this to be made part of the standard process!
The objectives setting process is either PARALLEL or CASCADING. PARALLEL means that the employee starts the process and the manager has to ‘agree’ the objectives. This agreement is done as a task in the PMP, rather than a response to a notification for approval.
I guess I need to understand WHY you need 2 approvers?
If you use the CASCADING model, then you are cascading objectives down from the top of the organisation and adapting them to lower level conditions. For example, CEO says ‘cut costs by 10%”. This objective might translate to ‘Cut Supplier costs by 10%’ when given as an objective to the Finance Director. He then sets objectives to his subordinates and links them to his own. For example, he sets the Purchasing Manager the objective of “Renegotiate contracts with suppliers”.
When you use cascading, you are implicitly approving the objectives because they are created from the top down.
You asked if you could create a custom workflow to control the second approval. Even if you did this (which I would not recommend), you would have problems with the way that the tasks are sent to and from managers and employees. I don’t think the user interface would support this.
As with all e-Business Suite implementations, the art is to make use of what it does well and not to customise the bits that don’t do what you want! This invariably leads to trouble!
Hope this helps
Regards
Tim

Issue in creating dev plan in talent management specialist role

Hi ,
I am facing issue in creating development plan through talent management specialist role . Actually in one system I have 2 location one is india & another one is USA . its working for india but when I search india employee its show no employee found . can you please guide me
Tarun

Hi Luke ,
According to one of your article , I run HRALXSYNC in r/3 , in that all indian employee are green but USA employee in RED . I found following error , can you please guide me that what is mean by that ?
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
Qualification 90007487 does not exist
The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105 1 1900010199991231
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
Qualification 90007487 does not exist
The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105 1 1900010199991231
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
Thanks
Tarun

Issue in EHP5 Talent Management (Team Goals) Cascade goals functionality

Hi Friends,
Issue in EHP5 Talent Management (Team Goals) Cascade goals functionality.
Under Team Object While try to cascade goals, it pop-Up Warning Msg u201CChoose Save to save the goal in the employee document. The goal can no longer be deleted, only set to obsoleteu201D.
If we click Ok to proceed further, I am getting error stating u201CYou have made no selection" and " No appraisal template defined ".
Same functionality is working fine in u201CPerformance Management (Predefined)u201D
With Regards
Seranjeeve Kumar

Please set the parameter PROCESS "PMP" in the iview configuration.
ie
ROLE_ID=PA&PROCESS=PMP in application parameters
content provided by SAP ->
specialist ->
Talent management Specialist ->
iViews ->
COmpany goals etc
and you can confirm using this
CL_HAP_CASCADE_GOALS > meth0d GET_VALID_APPRAISAL_TEMPLATES
The parameter mentioned in the note 1457057, the one that you enter in
transaction SE80 is the default value. However, if you call application
with parameter PROCESS=PMP then the PMP process for cascading goals will
be used.
check note 1523527

Development Plans functionality in Talent Management

Hello,
We are planning to use the Development Plans functionality in Talent Management.
But the Development Plan is not opening from MSS. (MSS -> Talent management -> Assessment -> Development Plan).
I had created the Business partner object for all my test PERNRs and I had created a Development Plan Template (via IMG step in Talent management). I had activated the Business Functions and Services.
When I open the Development plan in MSS, it is showing the names of employees (i.e. the reports of the manager). But when I click on an employee, it's not opening any development plan. Nothing is happening.
Please help me,
Thanks
Raghu

Hi Bharti,
You must first delete the template names from the customizing tables where it is stored (under Talent Assessment node of Talent Management and Talent Development). Then you delete it under PHAP_CATALOG. Unfortunately you have created an databse inconsistency and you might need to see if Basis can delete the values from the table.
Best regards,
Luke

Looks like small data discrepancy in hr_api_transactions.transaction_document for Talent Management

Hi,
I have some problem with the XML data in transaction document for Talent Management
Unable to perform transaction on the record.
Cause: The record has deleted by another user
When checked manually from back end, there objectives (IDs) that are there in XML type, aren't there in per_objectives table. The error seems right.
My task now is to find how many cases(objectives) are there like this. Logic is, look for objectives (that are marked as Update/Delete) in XML and find the ID existing in per_objectives or not. I could make-up the SQL for listing all objectives as a table result as below:
select
   extractvalue(VALUE(xx_row), '/ObjectiveEORow/Name') AS objective_name,
   extractvalue(VALUE(xx_row), '/ObjectiveEORow/ObjectiveId') oid
from hr_api_transactions txn,
       TABLE(xmlsequence(extract(xmlparse(document txn.transaction_document wellformed),'/Transaction/TransCache/AM/TXN/EO/ObjectiveEORow'))) xx_row
where extractvalue(xmlparse(document transaction_document wellformed),'/Transaction/TransCtx/TransactionRefId') = '26308'
and txn.transaction_id = 1946469;
Problem now is, to distinguish only the PS="3" (Delete) and PS="2"(Update) objectives. This table doesn;t show the PS attribute of the "ObjectiveEORow" node in XML.
               <ObjectiveEORow PS="3">
                  <ObjectiveId>1813772</ObjectiveId>
               </ObjectiveEORow>
Please help me in making the SQL show the XML attribute "PS" value for node "ObjectiveEORow".
regards,
Raj.

I could get the solution. Thanks everyone !
select 'E'||ppf.employee_number employee_number,ppf.full_name,txn.transaction_document,txn.transaction_id, i.*
from per_all_people_f         ppf,
      per_personal_scorecards psc,
      hr_api_transactions      txn,
         xmltable('/Transaction/TransCache/AM/TXN/EO/ObjectiveEORow'
            passing xmltype(transaction_document)
            columns
             PS varchar2(800) path '@PS',
             oid number      path 'ObjectiveId'
            ) i
    where txn.transaction_ref_table = 'PER_PERSONAL_SCORECARDS'
    and psc.scorecard_id = txn.transaction_ref_id
    and ppf.person_id = psc.person_id
    and trunc(sysdate) between ppf.effective_start_date and ppf.effective_end_date
    --and psc.plan_id = 146
    and i.ps in ('2','3')
    and ppf.employee_number in ('4018','5072','6389')
    and not exists (
       select 1
       from per_objectives o
       where o.objective_id = i.oid)
regards,
Rajkiran.

TREX - Search Talent Management

Hi All,
I know that there are many threads on the TREX and have looked at all of them and tried some of the things but i still get the error search not available.
We have created all search connector in the admin cockpit and have indexed all of them with no errors. All 32 of them are active. I then ran report ESH_TEST_SEARCH to test the searches. All of the objects templates return results except the following:
HRTMC_AES_DOCUMENTS
HRTMC_AES_ELEMENTS
HRTMC_AES_TEMPLATES
HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW
HRTMC_CENTRALPERSON
HRTMC_FUNC_AREA
HRTMC_JOB
HRTMC_JOB_FAMILY
HRTMC_ORG_UNIT
HRTMC_POSITION
HRTMC_QUALIFICATION
HRTMC_REL_CP_JF_744
HRTMC_REL_CP_Q_032
HRTMC_TALENT_GROUP
For most of these templates I get the following error:
Search Engine Error 29 for DHR310HRTMC_FUNC_AREA : attribute not defined for physical index;index esh:dhr310dhr310hrtmc_func_area~functional_areayy has no attribute 'objid'.
For the HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW i get no results, it comes back no values and has a yellow traffic light in the Log viewer. In the Job Log in the Admin Cockpit i see the following
31.05.2011 21:54:23 Object connector DHR310HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW: New status: Indexing
31.05.2011 21:54:23 The implementing class does not support the iterator by time interface
31.05.2011 21:54:23 Implementation did not provide any data -> exit indexing
31.05.2011 21:54:23 Object connector DHR310HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW: New status: Active
31.05.2011 21:54:23 Job finished
I also activated BADI HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW_DELTA in the IMG and ran report RPTMC_CREATE_CHANGEPOINT_AUTH. I then scheduled ESH_IX_PROCESS_CHANGE_POINTERS for the HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW, hoping the I would be returned with some results.howver
I do have a TMS linked to several org units via relation 741 and this is returned in the test search HRTMC_REL_S_O_RESP. In addition if I go to a Talent Review Meeting in the portal and click on 'ADD' to select an org unit, the managers of the Org Units that I am related to appear on the list. However as soon as I select any of them, they are added to the participant list but non of the nominated talents appear, i get the following message:
'No nominations are displayed since the search is not available'
for all other searches i get the error 'Search is not available' or 'No Relevant Records Were Found for This Search'
I Also checked SLG1 logs after attempting the searches and got the following errors:
2007 for DHR310HRTMC_CENTRALPERSON : NameServer error: no servers found; IndexId:esh:dhr310dhr310hrtmc_centralperson~~sap_talent
Exception occurred in program CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_RESPONSE=====CP, include CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_RESPONSE=====CM006, row 4
An exception has occurred
29 for DHR310HRTMC_CENTRALPERSON : attribute not defined for physical index;index esh:dhr310dhr310hrtmc_centralperson~personal_datayy has no attribute 'objid'
Exception occurred in program CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_RESPONSE=====CP, include CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_RESPONSE=====CM006, row 4
I also tried creating my own serch request using one of the search templates returning results. In this case i used the HRTMC_REL_CP_TB_743 templates with talent group ID as search field and assigned it to one of the search configurations. I then however got the following error.
The following error text was processed in the system DHR : The ASSERT condition was violated. The error occurred on the application server sivrs106_DHR_00 and in the work process 0 . The termination type was: RABAX_STATE The ABAP call stack was:
Method: GET_AUTHORIZATION_QUERY of program CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_REQUEST======CP
Method: SEARCH_ONE_CONNECTOR of program CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_REQUEST======CP
Method: SEARCH of program CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_REQUEST======CP
Method: CONSTRUCTOR of program CL_HRTMC_SEARCH_REQUEST=======CP
Method: GET_INSTANCE of program CL_HRTMC_SEARCH_REQUEST=======CP
Method: TRIGGER_SIMPLE_SEARCH of program CL_HRTMC_AC_SEARCH============CP
Method: ONACTIONSTART_SEARCH of program /1BCWDY/JUNQ9FJYULV16JASJHWU==CP
Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_INVOKE_EVENT_HANDLER of program /1BCWDY/JUNQ9FJYULV16JASJHWU==CP
Method: INVOKE_EVENTHANDLER of program CL_WDR_DELEGATING_VIEW========CP
Method: IF_WDR_ACTION~FIRE of program CL_WDR_ACTION=================
Anyone have any ideas on how i can resolve this.
Apologies for posting such a long thread, just trying to provide full picture.
Regards
Imraan

Hi Imraan,
You should be congratulated on a thorough post! What version and revision of TREX are you using? You should use TREX 7.1 revision 16 or higher. You should also review the PA-TM SAP notes for TREX. I would recommend reviewing some of the following (some you might need to come back to later):
u2022     1376055 - ESH_ADM_INDEX_ALL_SC: Exception in step 2: Create
u2022     1384953 - ESH: Error message 'A connection already exists' in cockpit
u2022     1437946 - TMC search: Frequently asked questions
u2022     1441190 - Error in model assignments to logical system
u2022     1457940 - Transporting software components: Error in after-import
u2022     1476894 - Transporting software components: Paths are lost
u2022     1483890 - Importing software components directly to target client
u2022     1492752 - Program to create a join index retroactively
u2022     1502296 - Too few ESH_OM_LOGSYSA entries after creating a connector
u2022     1538688 - Indexing Log: Warning "Object 'nw_esh_tst_auto' not ..."
u2022     1516237 - TMC search: Long runtime for indexing of HRTMC_REL_S_Q_031
u2022     1518396 - Indexes are not filled after TREX conversion
u2022     1520538 - TMC search: Performance for extraction of documents
u2022     1523648 - The search does not find any hits
u2022     1526710 - TMC search: Error during position switch by TMS
u2022     1529878 - Performance of authorization indexing
u2022     1534172 - TREX 7.10: Revision 42
u2022     1536663 - TMC search: Long runtime during indexing HRTMC_REL_SC_JF_FN
u2022     1536656 - Missing search attr for person search in Succession Planning
u2022     1540869 - TMC search authorization indexing with initial user ID
u2022     1541984 - Search connectors are not found
u2022     1542741 - Deleting connections
u2022     1550964 - TMC srch: Qualification srch criteria for CP-Q relationship
u2022     1551029 - TMC: Incorrect authorization check for PA infotypes
u2022     1554061 - TMC search: Error in search fields for job evaluation
u2022     1555950 - Indexing of HRTMC_AUTHORITY_VIEW: Data packages are too big
u2022     1558355 - TMC search: Empls. that have left company in search result
u2022     1560966 - TMC search: Error message when copying search configurations
u2022     1561070 - Termination when saving after deleting system assignments
u2022     1562742 - TMS / Search: Indexing fails with HRTMC_REL_S_MANAGER
u2022     1568563 - TMC search: Error when setting up authorization index
u2022     1567065 - TMC search: Simplifying the authorization indexing
u2022     1575454 - TMC search: Performance during CP indexing
u2022     1584309 - TMC search: Change pointer for newly created org. units
Also, did you follow these steps once TREX was connected?
[/people/luke.marson/blog/2010/09/20/setting-up-netweaver-embedded-search-trex-for-sap-ehp4-talent-management]
Best regards,
Luke

Talent Management Enhancement pack 4 Business Function HCM_TCM_CI-1

This business function contains some new job architecture functionality that we would like to utilize. These new object types are functional name (FN) and job family (JF). We do not plan to configure any of the talent management functionality because we will not be using it at this time. Activating this business function also activates a functionality called Embedded Search which requires TREX 7.1. We do not plan to do any of the configuration for the embedded search functionality either at this time as we don't think we will need it.
My question is, is anyone aware of any issues that might arise or what other SAP functionality that might be impacted by moving this business function into our Production environment without doing any of the configuration. We have implemented SAP Payroll, Benefits, Org management, Personnel Administration, eRecruiting and Learning.
Thanks in advance for any advise you can provide.

Hi Kathy:
In a nutshell, you shouldn't run into any issue. You're just going to get a host of new web dynpro apps, OM data, and infotypes for the Central Person (the 74XX infotypes). If you don't use them, then that's fine, it won't hurt anything.
You should be just fine using the HRP1001 450 relationships from JF to FN and C to help drive your job architecture. You would potentially need to use transaction HRTMC_PPOM to manage your job family/functional area relationships, but you won't negatively impact anything you have already implemented.
If you're not going to use any of the Talent Mgmt functionality, you also don't need to worry about enterprise search or TREX. I'm assuming you aren't using Succession Planning in eRecruiting, right? If you do ever consider using the Talent Management functionality you've now implemented, you will have to migrate data over from the old eRecruiting version of Succession Planning. Other than that, you should be good to go.
Hope that helps!
Thanks,
Chris

Talent management: talent information

Hi gurus,
I've used a day or two trying to locate this issue, can't seem to find anything, so hopefully some of you have experienced this before.
Currently I'm working on what's supposed to display in talent information in portal, and the weird thing is that some employees gives results on all the fields, and some are almost blank. The fields are defined, and new fields are created through BAdI, these works fine. I tried to change the org unit of some persons (into test org unit), to get real PERNR (which is the statement for one of the fields), and not only fictional PERNR from the test persons, here is where the issues starts.
Ref IMG documentation:
"If you want to implement the Talent Management and Talent Development application, a Business Partner (object type BP) object must exist for each of the central persons (object type CP) in your system."
I access transaction SA38, and runs the program HR_SYNC_PERSON. What I've found out, is that persons with IT6 result in a Basic Data error, people without IT6 runs smoothly through, and displays all wanted information. Why is that, how can it be that persons with address data won't work? IT6 uses time constraint 1, and deletion is not a option. How can I solve this?
QUESTION: Have any of you defined XXDEFAULT as a address type (cross client)? IMG-path: SPRO u2013 SAP BP u2013 BP u2013 Basic settings u2013 Address determination u2013 Define address types
- This may solve the issue, but I'm not comfortable doing changes cross client. Hope there are other solutions.
I would really appreciate some help, and please ask if more information is needed.

Hi Smriti,
You cannot search for Talent Group = ''. Try Talent Group = '*' instead.
For the second issue, it looks an issue with the Talent Group names. First, check SAP Note 1555220 - Activation of advanced search for TMS to ensure that you have the prerequisite SAP Notes installed. I would also raise an OSS message as there doesn't appear to be any SAP Notes on the issue.
Best regards,
Luke

Talent Management & Succession Planning

Hi
As part of the EHP4 functional upgrade of HCM core processes for Talent Management such as Succession Planning or talent development is getting switched on.
Any input on the impact it will have on existing BI reports on succession planning which is based on ehp3 data model.
(The latest talent Management and talent development BI content is available only in the release of EHP5 package)
Thanks & Regards
Venkat

Hi Dinu,
It sounds like a data issue. SP is probably reading the HRP1001 values but somewhere the data may have been corrupted or an object incorrectly deleted/unassigned. I would just delete the relationship in PP01 if not actual successor is assigned.
Kind regards,
Luke

Talent Management-RePublishing Plans

Hi Everybody,
I'm unable to re-publish the plans in Talent Management, as it says that there are broken supervisor hiearchies which need to be fixed first. I ran a report and found three employees with broken hierarchies, all three employees are terminated, so I've excluded them from the system by adding them to the Eligibility Override EIT. Normally when I do that, it fixes the problem and I'm able to re-publish the plans. However, this time it hasn't worked and the employees in question are still appearing as having broken hierarchies. Can you please investigate and see if it is in fact these three employees causing the problem and if so, why the system is ignoring the fact that I've excluded them in the EIT. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

I'm not technical, so can't comment on whether the SQL is correct. But, you can set objectives outside of the appraisal period, so your objectives might not yet be connected to a specific appraisal. Does your SQL allow for this?

Add custom embedded region or link in talent management

We are doing a proof of concept implementation of Oracle Talent
Management. As part of this implementation we have been requested to
add Salary change functionality to the employee performance appraisal
process. Usually this process is only used to evaluate
competencies, objectives and overall performance and does not include
salary information.
Our Thoughts:
Oracle provides out of the box the Salary change process on its own.
There is an entry page for the values, PRatePG, and then a review
page, ReviewPG. We would like to take the majority of the
functionality on those 2 pages and add that functionality to the 2
similar pages used for performance review. On the performance review
side the equivalent pages are the entry page MAFinalRatingsPG and the
review page,MAFinalRatingsRevPG.
We are looking for the best way to move forward regardless to
incorporate the functionality of entering and reviewing the salary
into the performance appraisal set of pages which don't currently
contain the data or functionality at all for salary.
We have considered also going a complete custom route, however the
functionality on the Salary screens are intricate and have several
PPR elements. Additionally, there was the thought to somehow add the
Salary page functionality as an additional page on the page flow as a
customization. This might still be an option as well. We are open
to any ideas.
Please let us know if any of you have done anything similar and would
like to share with us.
We would like to know what is the best option to meet the requirement
1)Create a link to seeded salary page
2)Embed the seeded salary region in Appraisal form
3)Create custom salary region and embed that into Appraisal form
Thanks

We are doing a proof of concept implementation of Oracle Talent
Management. As part of this implementation we have been requested to
add Salary change functionality to the employee performance appraisal
process. Usually this process is only used to evaluate
competencies, objectives and overall performance and does not include
salary information.
Our Thoughts:
Oracle provides out of the box the Salary change process on its own.
There is an entry page for the values, PRatePG, and then a review
page, ReviewPG. We would like to take the majority of the
functionality on those 2 pages and add that functionality to the 2
similar pages used for performance review. On the performance review
side the equivalent pages are the entry page MAFinalRatingsPG and the
review page,MAFinalRatingsRevPG.
We are looking for the best way to move forward regardless to
incorporate the functionality of entering and reviewing the salary
into the performance appraisal set of pages which don't currently
contain the data or functionality at all for salary.
We have considered also going a complete custom route, however the
functionality on the Salary screens are intricate and have several
PPR elements. Additionally, there was the thought to somehow add the
Salary page functionality as an additional page on the page flow as a
customization. This might still be an option as well. We are open
to any ideas.
Please let us know if any of you have done anything similar and would
like to share with us.
We would like to know what is the best option to meet the requirement
1)Create a link to seeded salary page
2)Embed the seeded salary region in Appraisal form
3)Create custom salary region and embed that into Appraisal form
Thanks

TREX vs Enetrprise Search - Talent Management

Hi,
We are implementing Talent Management and would like to find out what do we require for the enabling search functionality.
Do we require TREX or Enterprise search?
We currently have TREX version 7.0 installed and not Enterprise search. What is the difference between Enterprise search and TREX?
Please can someone advise?
Regards
Imraan

Hi Imraan,
TREX is the engine that runs the Enterprise Search that you will use in Talent Management. You need to install TREX on a dedicated server and connect it via RFC to SAP. Then you need to enable the business function ENTERPRISE_SEARCH in SFW5 and activate the ESH cockpit service in SICF. Then you need to create and index your search object connectors. You can use this guide for that:
[/people/luke.marson/blog/2010/09/20/setting-up-netweaver-embedded-search-trex-for-sap-ehp4-talent-management|/people/luke.marson/blog/2010/09/20/setting-up-netweaver-embedded-search-trex-for-sap-ehp4-talent-management]
Good luck!
Luke

Talent Management - PDF Docs IMG Config Step

Hello,
We are having some issues with the configuration step u201CAssign Application Forms to Elements of PDF-Based Documentsu201D.
Here are the steps we have taken so far:
1) Copied the Application Forms from Client 000 (HRTMC_RM_COVER, HRTMC_RM_TALENT_AGENDA_TOPIC, HRTMC_TALENT_PROFILE, HRTMC_TALENT_SHORT_PROFILE) to our Sandbox & Development Clients
2) Set u2018Use Complex Bundlingu2019 to u201Ctrueu201D via FPCONNECT (SM31)
3) Attempted to add the different u201CParameter valuesu201D HRTMC values (specified above) to the IMG config step assign application forms to elements of pdf-based docs
When trying to complete #3, we receive an error u2018enter a valid valueu2019. I checked both the Application Forms and the Forms Class and these objects exist, and are active. We even re-transported the objects to see if that was the problem, but it did not work.
Any thoughts to why we are receiving this message?

Can anyone tell me how doea the portal talent management configuration work???

Talent Management - Objective weightage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for