Task in "Ready" status always, when tested in SWUS

Hi - Hv created a very simple task - it has a BOR/Method which gets a PR No and passes back some PR related fields back to the task. An agent has been assigned with my user id. SWU_OBUF has also been tried. I am on ECC 6.0 and looks like all authorizations are good. But when executed in SWUS, this task remains in ready status & no Inbox/Outbox item appears in SBWP.
The log says the work item is a Dialog step but the BOR/Method attributes are NO DIALOG. 'Am at my wits end. Any help? Thanks!
One update : Authorizations in client 100 are set. When tested in 100 status is completed. When tested in client 200, status is ready. Can't do a SU53. How can I tell BASIS which authorization is missing, if any?
Regards,
Shireesh M
Message was edited by: Shireesh M
Shireesh Mitragotri

Hi,
as you pointed out, this could be an authorization issue, also check if you're not forgetting user parameters.
If I were you i would bother someone to include su53 in your profile since this is clearly needed to explain/exclude the behaviour of the wf.
Kind regards, Rob Dielemans

Similar Messages

Queues in READY status for no apparent reason

Dear All,
This question has been posted many times but never saw a conclusive answer on this forum.
To repeat, I see queues being built in READY status in APO inbound for no apparent reason.
All settings of scheduler being fine (SMQS - Type R), there are large number of queues awaiting to be manually unlocked from READY status and they get cleared on unlock. There are no waiting queues but still entries in say an update of a stock queue are like 70+. I am able to clear them manually but that would be stupidity when I am talking of 30K queues build up thus.
Its not that not a single queue is moving. Some are getting processed (RUNNING) on their own but thats at snails speed as compared to the queues in READY.
I have scheduled the report /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART that seems to have scheuled something in the background but I cant trace that job.
Please help.
Regards,
Loknath

Loknath,
If you have 'many' queues 'RUNNING' for a long period of time, LUWs that are inline behind them will eventually stop trying. You can restart these queues with the /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART program mentioned above.
There are lots of ways to tune queues to meet business requirements. Speak to your local CIF expert.
Some people use a job to run /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART on a regular schedule. I have seen a system where this job is scheduled to run hourly.
30K queues is not really reasonable. If you always have this backlog, then there is a performance issue that needs to be addressed (SCM is not able to process the data as fast as ECC is sending). If this is a startup, then you just have to be patient. Initial loads can sometimes take days to fully clear all queues, especially if the SCM is sized a bit on the small side. Continue restarting until you have cleared all queues, then see if they begin to build again.
Best Regards,
DB49

Queues in READY status

Dear All,
This question has been posted many times but never saw a conclusive answer on this forum.
To repeat, all settings of scheduler being fine (SMQS - Type R), there are large number of queues awaiting to be manually unlocked from READY status to clear them. There are no waiting queues but still entries in say an update of a stock queue are like 70+ in READY status. I am able to clear them manually but that would be stupidity when I am talking of 30K queues build up thus in READY status. Its not that not a single queue is moving. Some are getting processed (RUNNING) on their own but thats insignificant as compared to the queues in READY and also pathetically time consuming.
I have scheduled the report /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART that seems to have scheuled something in the background but I cant trace that job.
Please help.
Regards,
Loknath

Loknath,
If you have 'many' queues 'RUNNING' for a long period of time, LUWs that are inline behind them will eventually stop trying. You can restart these queues with the /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART program mentioned above.
There are lots of ways to tune queues to meet business requirements. Speak to your local CIF expert.
Some people use a job to run /SAPAPO/RCIFRESTART on a regular schedule. I have seen a system where this job is scheduled to run hourly.
30K queues is not really reasonable. If you always have this backlog, then there is a performance issue that needs to be addressed (SCM is not able to process the data as fast as ECC is sending). If this is a startup, then you just have to be patient. Initial loads can sometimes take days to fully clear all queues, especially if the SCM is sized a bit on the small side. Continue restarting until you have cleared all queues, then see if they begin to build again.
Best Regards,
DB49

Profile Manager Active Tasks never complete, are always pending

I'm using OS X Server 3.2.2 on OS X 10.9.5. I'm attempting to push changes to a device or device group (iMacs in this case), but the task status is always pending and the task never completes. However, when I manually download the Enrollment Profile on a client machine, it will contact the server and grab the device and device group profiles during the initial enrollment. We're not blocking any ports and the server and client are both on the same VLAN and subnet. I'm stumped as to why I'm seemingly only able to communicate to the server from a client and not the other way around. I appreciate any help and suggestions. Thanks.

Hi dankgus, I was reading this article which explains how the mechanics of this work.
http://www.justinrummel.com/how-apns-works-with-mdms-that-manage-osx-and-ios/
I then thought about your firewall comment, when I configured my firewall to work with my Mac MDM I used this Apple KBA ------> http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5302 however I did not open TCP:443 for security reasons. I actually thought this was just for device enrollment and management however it looks like the iOS device might actually require it to function properly. I opened the port and ran a device update which worked. I think it worked ok initially because internally users can get to the MDM over TCP:443 through our split DNS and as soon as they took their iOS devices out of the reach of our corp WIFI it stopped working. I will observe the results and report back and of course I welcome comments.

Web service works when tested, but a report on is blank

Hi All,
I have created a web service reference in apex using WSDL option. It works very well when tested.
Then I built a report on top of it. But I always see the message "no data found".
I even created the same web service reference manually. This also works fine when tested.But still a report on top of it is blank.
This web service does not take any input parameters.
I also tried the most popular Movie Information web service reference, and a form and report on top of it. Everything works fine for this.
I am wondering what could be wrong with my web service...?
Please help me with this.
Thanks and regards,
Deepika.

Hi All,
As I already mentioned, the web service definition works fine when tested from shared components, but when I create a web service report or sql report with onload web service process, or a form and report.. nothing works.
Always I see "no data found".
It would be very helpful if some body could throw light on this issue.
Thanks and regards,
Deepika.

How to make bean for embedded task flow stay in scope when calling TF?

I have a bounded task flow with page fragments: ManageRecommendationRuleTF.xml that defines a single managed bean with pageFlowScope: ManageRecommendationRuleBean.java
This task flow has one page ManageRecommendationRule.jsff that embeds two other bounded task flows as regions: ManageRuleTF.xml and ManageRuleConditionsTF.xml
Each of these task flows defines a single manage bean with pageFlowScope: ManageRuleBean.java and ManageRuleConditionsBean.java
From the ManageRecommendationRuleTF I call a bounded task flow: SelectTargetProductsTF.xml. When this task flow returns, the ManageRuleBean.java and ManageRuleConditionsBean.java are re-created. Why? I want the state of the beans before the SelectTargetProductTF is called. I do not want to resort to making this a session bean.
Build JDEVADF_11.1.1.5.0_GENERIC_110409.0025.6013

Hi,
the calling task flow is stacked when calling another task flow (using task flow call activity). When the called task flow is returning to the caller then the expected behavior is that the caller task flow is re-established. If this is not what you see, please provide a test case and file a Service Request with support to investigate why this is not working for you. You could e.g. add log messages to the task flow finalizers to see if when navigating off to the called task flow the two region task flows are finalized. If the regions are dynamic regions with the bean in view scope, try and change this to pageFlowScope
Frank

How to use ADF variables in C:when test?

I have a <af:iterator in my page fragment as follows
<af:iterator id="i1" value="#{queryModel.currentDescriptor.conjunctionCriterion.criterionList}" var="criterion" varStatus="vs">
Within this iterator, I want to make a decision absed on the index of the iterator. To do this test, I am using jstl as follows
<c:when test="${vs.index == '0' or vs.index == '2' or vs.index == '4'}">
This test is however always evaluating to false. I have tried cahnging my code using various combiantion as below ...
<c:when test="#{vs.index == '0' or vs.index == '2' or vs.index == '4'}">
<c:when test="${vs.index == 0 or vs.index == 2 or vs.index == 4}">
<c:when test="${vs.index == '0' || vs.index == '2' || vs.index == '4'}">
But nothign seems to be working fine.
Can some one help me with what I am doing wrong?
Thanks.

How to use ADF variables in <C:when test?

Source system jobs in ready status

Hi Gurus,
I am Extracting data from R/3 to BW, when i execute the infopackage the jobs in source system are in ready status and they are not moving to active & finished status.
Is there any method to make the jobs in source system active manually.
Thanks & Regards,
chinnu.

When you execute the infocpackage you must use the inmediatly option for execution or programmed job ...in your case is assume that you use the orogrammed job....if you use this last option...you must setup your job with init time...if you do not use the start time and hour the job will never starts....this could be your problem

BADI to set task and checklist status based on phase status

Hi,
We have a requirement to set the system status and user status of all the task and checklist to complete when the phase that they belong to is set to status complete.
I have implemented the badi DPR_EVENTS which gets triggered when Phase is completed.
My issue is this badi does not work when the phase is completed as system does not allows the change any data of tasks or checklist items since the phase is complete. I get a message stating "you cannot change the status of this task".
I tried reseting the complete status of teh phase and setting the tasks status and then setting the phase status back to complete. But this does not seem to be working.
Is there any way to achieve this requirement?
Thanks,
Simmi

Since we could not do it on Phase complete event we did it for some other event

PO status always remains "AWAITING APPROVAL" - WF error

Hi all,
We are working on SRM 5.0 SP13 ,ECS.
We have implemented the workflow WS14000145 for PO approval.Now when I perform a consistency check at SWUD for WFL WS14000145,I get the foll errors:
E.     WS14000146     POSub.n-Step Subworkflow N-Step for PO (BADI)
       I WD:017 No start events or start transactions/forms
       I WD:019 Container element ExcludedAgents is not used
E.     TS14007959     POMAILSEND   Send Mail to Affected Parties/Purch
E.     BUS2201                        APPROVED
       Binding warnings
       E SW:084 The object categories 'BO' (source) and 'CL' (target)ar
E.     BUS2201                        REJECTED
       Binding warnings
       E SW:084 The object categories 'BO' (source) and 'CL' (target) ar
How do I correct the above errors for the workflow?
Also because of the above WF errors,I am unable to close some of the PO's .When I try to close the PO's(by checking the indicators "No further confirmations expected " and "No further invoices expected " under Item data-->statistics),the indicators remain checked but the PO status always remains "AWAITING APPROVAL".When I click on the approval preview(graphical view),I see message "Error .click for details" and under table view ,I see "NO APPROVAL REQUIRED".
In order to close the above PO's,is there any workaround or other way I can change the status of the PO temporarily to atleast be able to close the PO's?
Please advise.

Thanks Muthu!The note does seem relevant but I am still confused due to a new observation
Another observation :
The WF for PO approval is actually not activated in our system which means that this issue is not related to workflow .Additionally ,now I see some errors in the backend application monitor stating that "PO backend Transfer failed".
So as Masa mentioned earlier,this issue could be more related to PO replication.I tried all ways to update the status for the PO and observed the foll:
1. After running SW01,for the changed/latest GUID of the PO,the PO header status did change to "ORDERED" but then under Item data-->statistics the indicator for confirmation was reset.When I tried to chekc the indicator to again close the PO,the PO header status again changed to "Awaiting Approval".
2. Using FM SWW_DLEETE_ITEM,deleted the work item(old) for the PO and tried to chnage the status as mentioned above.But the issue still remained.
3.Tried to make the status "AWAITING APPROVAL" inactive by using FM "CRM_STATUS_UPDATE" but no success.In BBP_PD,the document status was updated(Awaiting approval inactive checked) but in the web portal,Under "Process Purcahse order" transaction,the PO header status still showed as "AWAITING APPROVAL"..
Please advise.

Error when testing the standard idoc number of type PORDCH

while i was testing the idoc message type PORDCH in we02,i have got an error message type saying as
the following below are the steps which i have done in testing the idoc
WE02
Enter Idoc 705556 and execute
Opened status record.
Looked at the error under status 51. it says
An error has occurred assigning data (E1BPMEPOITEM )
Message no. B1527
Diagnosis
To call a BAPI the IDoc data must first be assigned to the relevant BAPI interface parameters.
An error has occurred when carrying out this operation, possibly due to an incorrect data type or data format in the segment E1BPMEPOITEM.
Procedure
Check that the data types in the IDoc data record matches the data types in the BAPI parameter.
You can reproduce the same error with BD87
Enter Idoc number and execute.
Drill down to the error (debug) and click process.
sap has shown the following error message in one of the status record when i tested using transactions bd87 and we02.
so wat must i do ,can i implement the SAP Note 731418 - ALE interfaces for PORDCR1 and PORDCH
are not up-to-date or is there any alternate way
will be waiting for quick and good response
bye.
Regards.
Varma Mandapati

Hi Seeta Ram,
try to reprocess the idoc using the Program
Program RBDMANI2 for status 51 ..
Read the below document for the Possible error
Processing in the Application Layer
The posting function module either calls a standard
SAP transaction, using the call transaction command
for posting the document, or invokes a direct input function module.
The results of the execution are passed back via the function
module's output parameters. If posting is successful, an application
document is created. The IDoc gets a status code of 53 (Application document posted).
If errors occur, the IDoc gets a status code of 51 (Application document not posted).
Regrads,
Prabhudas
Edited by: Prabhu Das on Apr 17, 2009 11:22 PM
Edited by: Prabhu Das on Apr 17, 2009 11:23 PM

Can avoid the entering my username and password always when i click on URL

Hi,
Iam new to BSP,i developed a simple BSP application to display a list of orders on the second page when a cutomer is entered in the first page. it is working fine.
when i test the BSP application, it is asking for username and password.when i entered my username and password it is working fine.
Then my question is when i test the BSP application, can i avoid the entering the username and password always.
is there any way we can avoid the entering my username and password always when i click on the URL.
Thanks
Srinivas Manda

sure.
You can include the password and the username in the BSP link :
<bsp_lnk>?sap-client=<client>?sap-user=<username>?sap-password=<password>
where:
<client> = client where the username and password are defined
<bsp_lnk> = your bsp link
<username> = your username
<password> = your password
Regards,
fabrizio

Backgroung jobs remain in "Ready" status

Dear All,
Our Production is one central instance ( on Hp-ux ) and 3 application server ( one is on Hp-ux work as application server/failover server when central server down then that server act as central server ( cluster ) . and two more application server on redhat enterprise server 3).
Problem is that when my Linux application server in working or started or functioning background jobs (mostly) remain in ready status why?
In same forum I read that after restart system it will finish but it is not a solution.
Please guide me
Regards
Rayyan

check whether you have enough free bgd processes on second node?
And check those jobs are not server specific...
Regards,
Nick Loy

When testing an ipad 2 battery with a voltmeter, Am i suppost to get 3.7v from both terminals

When testing an Ipad 2 battery with a voltmeter, Am I suppost to get 3.7 volts from both + terminals. at present I get 3.7v from one terminal and 2.5v from the other.

Thanks Alfred,
My iTunes on the Air are up to date. Tried 3 times to restore and always get error 3. The iPad now only shows the graphic to plug into iTunes.
Called hotline to Apple rep yesterday, (chat) then they phoned me. He couldn't figure it out and went to consult a colleague. That was yesterday afternoon & he hasn't called back yet. This is on my dime.
Any idea what error 3 is.
Talaguniak
Mac user since 1984,
512k origininal, just smoked itself 4 months ago due to internal corrosion.
Now using Air, iPad mini, iPhone

Why do Motion Tweens fail when tested?

I have created a motion tween in CS4 that works perfectly when scrubbing with the playhead. However, when testing, the motion tween fails yet the rest of the animation plays perfectly. Does anybody know of any issues that could cause this?

Ned:
Thanks for sticking with me through this. Yes, I'm aware tweens are not new. It is the new way that Motion tweens are implemented in CS4 that I am talking about, not what are now known as classic tweens. Anyway, I figured it out and for the sake of the next Flasher that experiences this issue, I'd like to explain how it got solved. I have rarely developed a Flash project where I animated on the timeline. I always did my animation programatically and used only the first frame of the timeline to make everything happen. This meant that dynamically loading symbols and assets from the library required instantiating and loading these assets with actionscript and linking.
For example, if I had a movie clip named thisMC_mc in the library, I would export it to actionscript under the properties menu and give it a class name such as ThisMC. From there, in the document class I would tell Flash I was going to use it at some point by instantiating it at the top of the class like so:
public var thismc:thisMC = new thisMC();
Once this was done it was in scope and I could load and manipulate the movieClip at any time using the name thismc.
So, why did my Motion tweens fail on this project. Well, there were times I would place a library symbol on the stage at authoring time and since it was already on the stage, I did not need to instantiate it as shown above. I just needed to make sure it had an instance name in the properties inspector. And because I did everything from the first frame of the timeline, the MovieClip remained in scope. With this project, I just thought that principle followed through to other frames on the timeline as well. If they were placed on any frame during authoring time I figured they were in scope of the document class.
Apparently, this is not the case. because the tweens would not function when testing. As soon as I started thinking in programatic animation terms, the first thing I did was to instantiate the tweened MovieClips in the document class as shown above. The tweens started working like a charm. This probably occurred because there are event listeners and code in the document class associated with the tweened MovieClips.
I can only assume this issue has to do with scope and that I missed it because I rarely use more than one frame for animation so I wasn't thinking about it correctly.
If anybody can shed more light on exactly what went on it would be greatly appreciated.
By the way, I actually like the new way of doing motion tweens in CS4. It only took a little studying and it all made sense. They are actually easier to set up and I love the fact that you only need to work with one instance all the way through the tween and the tween is not broken up by a bunch of keyframes. I have found that most hardcore Flashers complain about something everytime a new version is released. Mostly just because they are used to the current version and now they are out of their comfort zone. CS4 is a major change but now that I've been working in it for about two months I don't want to go back to any earlier versions. So go ahead and upgrade, once you get use to it I think you'll love it.

Task in "Ready" status always, when tested in SWUS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for