Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund
Dear Experts,
It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
The funds management document was also correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
Could you please help me with this problem?
Kind Regards,
Rui Neves
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company. The existing system is also in ECC6. For contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object. The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object. Tax amount is appearing against rental contract. As a result, there is a difference in amount. Is this correct as a process ?
Regards,
T Saravanan
Similar Messages
-
In Withholding Tax, Amount is not appearing in Remittance Challan
Hi,
I have done WHT configuration in Implementation project, This is my 1st Project and I am new in SAP, I am facing following 2 Problems
1) Remittance Challan is getting prepared.but amount is not showing in the remittance challan, all the process till Certificate is happening smoothly. Please advice, where my settings went wrong or If I missed something in the configuration?
2) Please also guide or tell me the steps for configuring E-TDS filing.
Again requesting to kindly provide the solution.
Thanks
Regards
SunilYour Qn. No.1 is answered in the following thread.
Re: WHT Error while J1INCHLN ? -
WIthholding Tax TAB is not appearing in F-53,F-58
Hi SAP Gurus,
we are on SAP ECC 6.0 and if we execute all post withclearing transaction like f-53 or F-58 only following tabs are appearing
Standard
Partial Payment
Residual Item
and Withholding tax tab is not appearing, we have checked in SHDO and Withholding tax code having progrmamme SAPDF05X and screen 6105 and it is appearing there
please help us out where changes have to made to activate this TAB as due to supression of this TAB our end users have to make Witholding tax calculation manual which is tedious job
BR
SajidaHi Sajida,
Kindly check the Vendor Reconciliation G/L Account in FS00 Tcode check the Field Status
variant for eg. G067 whether the Withholding tax code and Withholding tax amounts are Optional
Entries or not.
Hope this will help to solve your issue
Thanks
Trinath -
FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)- Withholding tax amount is not coming .
in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN QBSHB OF FBL1.
Purchasing document number is not coming also.
How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
Thanks in advance
M K Agarwal
9967029930TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
*With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer the note 363309. -
TDS Amount is not appearing in TDS Certificate
HI Sap Experts,
J1INCERT - In TDS certificate, TDS column, amount is not appearing, but in column Total Tax deposited amount is appearing correctly.
My client is using ECC 6.0 Version.
Thanks in adavance .
Regards,
LakshmiHi Lakshmi,
Have you got the solution?
I have the same problem.Please let me know what needs to be done if have found the solution.
Thanks,
Kumar -
In fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing
in fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing
in sap note 363309 determines
Solution
Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
how to remove from the layout
please clarefy
bhayyapuHi,
If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
JPA -
Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item Message FF753
Dear all,
During creating billing document, the system cannot post account document and display the follow error message:
FF753 Tax code does not appear in any G/L account item.
I tried to trace the program and found internal table t_bseg containing 3 entries:
1: Customer a/c: without tax code
2: GR clearing a/c: without tax code
3: Output tax a/c: contain tax code
Customer a/c and GR clearing a/c without tax code causes this error.
Anyone know how to solve it?
Thanks & B.RegardsHi,
In FS00 for GR/IR A/c in Control data, in Tax Category choose all tax types allowed (*) and also tick posting without tax allowed and try again.
Regards,
Sadashivan -
Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active
Hi
We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
Please advise.
Regards
SandeepHi:
If you could please refer to the contents of OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
"Symptom
If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
Other terms
FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
Reason and Prerequisites
The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
Solution
In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
Basically:
The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
the condition is no tax condition.
After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
Special features:
1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
the condition is not a tax condition.
2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
Notes:
1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
Regards -
Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base
Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit KulkarniHello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item -
Tax code is not appearing in PO
Hi All
I am using TAXINJ procedure.
while creating po for excise material and I clicked on tax code tab in item level in invoice then tax code is not in list but it maintain in ftxp and all conditions with gross price becomes greyout so that i can not enter gross price.
I check with j1id, it maintain correctly.taxcode also assign to country level.
Can anybody give me the solution,
1)why tax code is not appearing in tax tab in PO.and
2)why gross price condition is in display mode.
Thanks and Regards...
Trupti> 1)why tax code is not appearing in tax tab in PO.and
If You have done all the Settings Properly then it will Show in Tax codes List. Please go to Tax code Field and Press F4 and in Next Window Click on display all Values icon and try
> 2)why gross price condition is in display mode.
Go to Gross Price Condition type in M/06 and Check Whether the Manual entries is Set to D Cannot Process Manually.
also Check whether Function Authorization is Assigned to User so that Prices Cannot be Manually Entered. -
TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
Dear All,
I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
please reply me ASAP
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnilhi
try this
We need to follow the following steps
u2022 Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
u2022 Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
u2022 On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
Regards,
Manish -
Item's withholding tax amount is not zero
Dear All,
When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
S No customer documents selected
S No G/L account documents selected
I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
Regards,
TejaHi,
please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
Reg
Madhu M -
Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG
Dear All,
I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
rgds,
DahliaThanks Andreas,
However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
thks
Dahlia -
Tax codes are not appearing in FB70 drop down list.
Hi all,
I have created some new taxcodes and assigned them with company code.
Now these tax codes are not appearing in FB70 down list.
Can anyone suggest the solution for this?
Thanks & regards,
Rupam.HI,
To appear the TAX codes in FB70 dropdown list you need to assign those new tax codes in the below configuration.
Spro -> financial accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable ->Business Transactions-> Outgoing Invoices/Credit Memos->Outgoing Invoices/Credit Memos - Enjoy ->Define Tax Code per Transaction
in that selct your country and in the next screen select new entries button and add those new tax codes. when adding chose the option FIAR FInancial accounting out going invoices. and save the entries.
after this setting you can able to see those new tax codes in FB70 dropdown list.
hope this helpful.
Regards,
Sandhya. -
Tax Conditions types not appearing in CRM orders and quotations
Hello All,
I have created a new tax condition type in ECC and through initial load replicate the same to CRM. pricing procedure repliction with new tax condition is also successful.
But, the new tax condition is not appearing in condition tab at item level when i create quotation in CRM. other condition types are coming. data for this condition type is there in custom condition table. mapping of tax classifiction to tax group is also done in SPRO.
Please advise.
THank and Regards
Sudhir GroverHello Sudhir,
You should check the trace log for pricing at first. Set the user parameter:PRC_TRACE as 'X' on T-cd:SU01 for your user and check the Access analysis on the condition tab.
Regards,
Masayuki
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem trying to update nokia 5800
My problem is when i try to update my nokia 5800 with the nokia software updater it says my current firmware is version 31.0.101, update version is also 31.0.101. I know there is a new version available,can anyone help me out please. Thanks
-
Error in CRM Middleware- SMQ2-Sysfail-Message 999999.
Dear All, I have a problem of one of the queues(in SMQ2-inbount) in CRM 5.0 is struck with SYSFAIL error. The queue name is R3AI_DNL_COND_A005. When I double click the queue entry I get an Error: Message No 999999. Log directory is full. Even resetin
-
LOV with inputListOfValues not working
Hi, using JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0 and Fusion Web Application (ADF). I simply cannot make LOV work in any scenario. I have a view with a transient attribute on which I define LOV. When I test application module everything works as expected I get a LOV p
-
Canon HF10 avchd file will not transfer in Log and Transfer window
Hello- I just installed Final Cut Express 4 on my MacBook (intel core due with 4gigs ram... running snow leopard/ 10.6.1) and I cannot get any video to load in from my Canon Vixia HF10. When using the Log & Transfer window my camera is recognized and
-
Upon start up of my laptop I get a APS Daemon.exe system error - MSVCR80.dll is missing. This just started out of the blue. At one point it told me to reinstall ITunes. Is that truly necessary?