Tax amounts calculating wrong

Dear Experts,
I am using tax code (ZS) with 10%, 2% and 1%.
when i am posting FB60 by using this tax code its calculating tax amounts wrongly.
For example i am posting Rs.20000/-
when system has to calculate..
Vendor Cr                         20,000/-
Expense Dr                      17,940/-
Sevice tax On OH Dr          2,000/-
ECS on OH   Dr                     40/-
SEC on OH   Dr                     20/-
But Systm Calculating like below..
Vendor Cr                         20,000.00
Expense Dr                      18,132.37
Sevice tax On OH               1,813.24
ECS on OH                             36.26
SEC on OH                            18.13
Plese help on this issue...

Dear Anil
Kindly note that Tax will always be created on Amount Exclusive of Tax. Let me explain with an example.
The form of invoice would be in the following form :
Expense of Service Recd                      20000 (Excl of Tax)
Add : Serv Tax @10%                            2000
Add : Ecess & SHCess                             60
Total Invoice Amt.                                22060 (Incl of Tax)
Thus if you enter Against Expense 20000 as net invoice amount  in FB60
then following entry will be generated :
Exp .....                               Dr.  20000
Serv Tax                              Dr.    2000
Ecess & SHcess                  Dr.      60
To     Vendor                              22060
But if you choose Expense 20000 as gross amount invoice in FB60
Exp .....                               Dr.  18,132.37
Serv Tax                              Dr.   1,813.24
Ecess & SHcess                  Dr.      54.39
To     Vendor                              20,000.00
Hope it provide you better picture about Tax Calculation

Similar Messages

  • Tax amount calculation

    Hi,
    Can some one help me to explain how the tax amount is calculated.
    I have a tax procedure assigned to my country. I created a input tax code.
    Now i used this tax code while creating a PO i entered the tax code.
    How the system determine the base amount for BASB condition type to calculate tax?? Will it take from the PO ??
    regards
    raghu ram
    Edited by: Raghu Ram Thatavarthy on Jun 23, 2009 12:17 PM

    Hi
    In the Tax codes, you would have attached the percentage to the account keys, which has the condition types attached to it. In the PO pricing procedure, the basis for calculation of the Tax would be available ie on what value tax needs to be calculated against the condition type. Account key can be seen against the Condition types. and from the tax codes percentages are taken and taxes derived.
    Regards,
    Lakshmanan Krishnan

  • How the Tax amount calculated in AR for this scenario (11i)

    Dear All,
    I have some doubts with the Tax amount in the AR Trx. Please look into below scenario.
    Step1: Create SO and AR Trx
    In OM side:
    1. I created a SO 001 and there is a item A only. The item's Unit Selling Price is *100$*, Quantity is *1*. Then the SO flown to AR.
    In AR side:
    1. AR Trx 001 is created for the SO and Tax rate is 17%. Hence the AR Trx Total Amount = Line Amount + Tax Amount = 100 + (100 0.17) = 117*.
    Step2: The item has been return from customer.
    In OM Side:
    2. I added the same item with the Unit Selling Price *200$* and Quantity -1. Then the new SO line flown to AR.
    In AR side:
    2. Credit Memo is create for the return line of SO.
    My doubt is:
    What's the tax amount for the Credit Memo? It is 200 * 0.17 or the original trx tax amount (100 * 0.17)?
    Thanks & Best Regards!
    Jerome

    Jerome,
    The tax calculated on the Credit memo is always based on the Credit memo amount. So it will be on $200.
    However there are few things you need to consider here. If you are creating a RMA in OM and if overapplication is not enabled for the AR Transaction type, the RMA will fail during Autoinvoice since you cannot credit more than the Invoice amount.
    One thing I am not sure though is whether you can actually create a RMA with a price different than that of the Original Order.
    Hope that helps.
    Thanks,
    Anil

  • Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly

    Dear Friends,
    While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
    For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
    Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
    Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
    Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
    Thanks,
    Hari Dharen

    Thank you Mani Kumar,
    But that's what we already have in customizing:
    The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
    The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
    The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
    51,000*3% = 1,530
    W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
    F110 Proposal generated:
    It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
    (only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
    W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
    Thanks

  • Wrong Calculation of Tax Amount

    Hi to All,
    While making Down Payment Request (F-47) with reference capital PO, system is showing a warning message as below:
    Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR
    Message no. FF707
    Diagnosis
    The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amount calculated (using the percentage rates defined in the tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors.
    Procedure
    If this message is a warning message, you can confirm that your entry is correct by pressing "Continue".
    If this message is an error message, you should correct the tax amounts or the base amounts, depending on how your tax code is defined.
    For more clarity: whatever the tax code is in PO same tax code giving in F-47. But in both scenarios system calculating differently.
    what could be the reason? Please guide me?
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you said, In PO system does not calculate tax based on the tax code,it will calculate based on the pricing procedure.
    Now my doubt is whatever the tax amount is showing in PO that we need to enter in to F-47,But here system is showing
    (Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR).
    Now what should I do? Please help me on this..
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

  • Miro service tax amount is calculating wrongly for particular materials for import PO

    Dear All,
    I have created import PO with three vendors like foreign vendor, customs duty vendor & Clearing Agent vendor.
    After creating PO with all conditions the PO is posted and MIGO is done.
    While doing MIRO there is no problem for foreign vendor and customs duty vendor (there is no service tax applicable for both)
    While doing MIRO for Clearing agent vendor, we have to calculate service tax for 12.36 %.
    The service tax is properly maintained in the system and its calculating correctly for all other PO's except this PO.
    This particular PO has 32 materials.the values are flowing correctly from PO to MIRO but while calculating service  tax the tax value is higher than the exact value.
    When we do MIRO for same clearing agent with different material the service tax is calculating correctly. But if we use particular materials  with same clearing agent vendor the tax amount is not calculating correctly
    For example:
    for Item 10
    The value is 1062.72 & 12.36 to be calculated on this value.
    The actual tax value is 131.35 but in MIRO its showing as 171.90. The same problem is happening with all other 31 materials.
    The Info record is not maintained for all the materials. On what basis should we check for the above issue. Kindly help with your valuable inputs.
    Kindly refer the screenshot.
    Thanks & Regards
    Subbu

    Hi Ajith,
    Please find the screenshot below
    But for same vendor with different material in another PO the tax is calculating correctly
    9050* 12.36 = 1118. 58
    For this the tax is exactly calculating as 1118.58
    Regards
    Subbu.

  • Wrong base amount calculation for entry tax

    Hi,
    We want to capture entry tax in PO with condition type ENT1. The issue appearing for the condition is that the Base value calculated to calculating the ENT1 is (Base Value + Excise + 2 * VAT). Where as the propser calculation should be (Base Value + Excise + VAT).
    For example -
    Base Value - 1000
    Excise (BED + ECS + SECESS) - 10.3
    VAT (4%) - 4
    Sub Total - 1014.30
    Entry tax (2%) - 20.29
    Where the entry tax getting calculated is 20.37 considering VAT as 8 (2 * 4). We want the entry tax as 20.29.
    How can we achieve this?
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Hi Vikas,
    Please check in OBQ3 what is the "From" field of JEC1 and JSEP. This should be the step denoting JMOP.
    Regards
    Binoy

  • S_ALR_87012357 / S_ALR_87012356-Wrong reporting of tax amounts on the tax reports.

    Hi,
    S_ALR_87012357 / S_ALR_87012356
    Tax amount for tax codes V9, VP and VT are calculated and
    displayed correctly in FI reporting but they are reported at a higher amount in
    the tax reports run by transactions S_ALR_87012357 / S_ALR_87012356.
    Since its a standard report , I would expect there would  be a way of correcting this wrong tax amount showing this report .
    Is there any SAP note regarding this error ?
    Appreciate your help and advise..
    Kind Regards
    Thiru

    Hi Srikanth ,
    As you mentioned it is showing the difference ...
    Please find attached screenshot ...
    Is there a way to correct this ? since its creating an issue& confusing from Finance/Accounting point of view...
    Kind regards
    Siva..

  • Input Tax and Output Tax calculating wrong figures

    Hi,
    I have created Input Tax and Output Tax codes in SAP.
    Input Tax- 3%
    Output Tax- 4%
    All the configuration is done as required. But when I am posting the Purchase and Sales Invoice, the tax amount is not calculating correctly.
    For example:
    Input Tax Calculation should be:
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)
    Input Tax Calculation in SAP:
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 30000)
    The same is happening to Output Tax transactions.
    Please advice.

    My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
    Input Tax Calculation should be:
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
    Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
    Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
    Correct Entry should be:
    Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
    Expense A/C............Dr 30000
    Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
    Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong

    dear guru
    while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
    my issue is like this
    i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
    ED is calculated 140
    Ecess calculated 3
    S&H calculated 1
    i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
    now i that part of the quantit i have returne
    lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
    next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
    lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
    ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
    for that i have to apply any note
    pl tell me urgent
    thanks
    regards
    jrp

    My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
    Input Tax Calculation should be:
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
    Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
    Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
    Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
    Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
    Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
    Correct Entry should be:
    Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
    Expense A/C............Dr 30000
    Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
    Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

  • BSET-HWBAS Tax Base Amount is wrong / double

    Dear Experts,
    We have a scenario where in IDOC comes from External system to SAP for posting. We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for doing the postings. I have nearly passed all the necessary parameters but still the Tax base amount in BSET is wrong. And it happens only for one tax code only.
    I have passed the GL Account details, Currency amount  and Tax amount details. For each tax line I am also filling the  the relevant item number i.e. BAPIACTX09-ITEMNO_TAX.
    Can you please suggest solution for this issue. I have tried to serach SAP notes + SDN post but could not get suitable solution.
    The current issue is as follows:
    40200001  AB      103,11- (i.e. 20% tax)
    75003000 VN       90,00-   (i.e. 10% tax)
    34000000 AB       20,62-   (i.e. tax calculated). Here I have entered only the tax items. The currency balance with other entries is zero.
    But when I have a look at Environment--> Tax Data then it shows Tax Base amount for "AB" as 206.22 (i.e. 1033.11 x 2). The tax base amount for VN is right as 90.
    Kindly advise.
    -Abhishek

    Solved by myself.
    Refer SAP Note 626235 for details. The Tax by-pass for BKPF-AWTYP was switched off. This customization is maintained in table TAX_APPLI.

  • Withholding tax base amount is wrong for sales invoice

    Dear Gurus,
    we had generated invoice for cop (colombia paiso) 1377350 as follows
    sales a/c cr         1080000
    sales a/c cr             90000
    sales a/c cr           114400
    sales a/c cr            92950
    vat     a/c cr            33176
    w/h   a/c dr            36911(withholding tax account)
    customer a/c dr  1373615
    The wiholding tax rate is 3.5%. it is applicble only for first line for cop 1080000. we had applied withholding condition to that line only. The vat amount cop 33176 is 16% on cop(92950+114400). There is no withholding tax or vat on line for cop 90000. when we post the invoice, the withholdng tax base amount change from 1080000 to 1054598 and system post the wihholdng tax for cop 36911 instead of 37800. In sales invoice there is no possibility to change the base amount mannually in condition. it is grey area.
    we had check the configuration part about maxmimum amount,minimum amount,withholding tax base amount,calculation procedure.withholding tax type,withholding tax code. Nothing is found wrong.
    you early answer is highly appreciated
    Reagrd,
    Rajesh K

    Hi
    Cheque Go to Menubar of  which document you have to  post for getting the WHT value  Menubar Settings - editing options -  remove the tick calculate tax on net amount.
    Rgds
    Vani

  • Calculation of Tax Amount in FB60

    Hi Guru's,
    Here Tax Procedure is TAXINN in which I have maintain Tax Code V9 as 14.42% (EXCISE+CESS) + 12.5% (VAT) in FV11. So while doing MIRO I select V9 Tax code then automatically Tax amount is calculated.
    My question is can same can done in FB60. Means can Tax amount can automatically calculated in FB60 when I selecting V9 as Tax Code which was calculated in MIRO.
    I needed for transaction without Purchase Order.
    Right answer will be rewarded.
    Regards
    Amit

    Thnks for reply.
    I have already done the customization in OB40 but when i do invoice posting in FB60 then error shows "Tax Code V9 does not exist in TAXINN".
    But since in MIRO same Tax code get posted with same vendor.
    Pls help me.
    Regards

  • Disable auto-calculation of tax amount by Autoinvoices to import AR Invoice

    Hi all,
    I am using ra_interface_lines_all to do AR Invoices conversion to Oracle R12. My legacy invoices data contains tax amount and some of the invoices do not have any tax. Autoinvoice auto-calculated tax information during import even for those invoices that have no tax.
    I checked my AR interface record and made sure none of the tax-related columns (e.g. tax_code, tax_amount, etc) are populated. I also checked the AR transaction source for conversion and make sure tax-calculation flag is not set.
    Basically I need to set the tax amounts manually instead of letting the system to derive it. Some suggested to set tax_exempt_flag to "E". I tried but Autoinvoice complained that I need to have tax reason and besides I have many invoices that have tax amounts.
    Any suggestions on disable the auto-calculation of tax?
    Thanks! Mike

    Hi Mike,
    U r using transaction types to generate your distributions, right?
    Try to insert distribution info for each of your invoices in the table ra_interface_distributions_all, specifying REC, REV and TAX (tax where applicable) lines.
    Hope this will solve your prob.
    Vik

Maybe you are looking for

  • Are 'read only' items causing my automatic row processing to fail?

    I have a form that uses automatic row processing to update my table. I recently had to add a check to lock down the fields using the read only condition where a record has been 'approved'. So, I turned off all of the fields and hid the update button.

  • In which table we can find the sessions log

    Hi all, I am using BDC using session method,I need to know the  table in which session log is getting updated, one more thing could I able to find the session log for the past one year in SM35, plz help me out. regards paul

  • I wanted to create a module pool which accepts a table n flag

    i wanted to create a module pool which accepts a table n flag. and based on flasg value it allows the table to get into edit or display mode. the table has to use table control to display for user and it should be able to edit the table as well as ap

  • PSE 12 Installation ?

    Hallo Moin Moin. Leider spreche und verstehe ich kein Englisch Unlängst hatte ich einen Supervirus auf meinem PC. Musste alle Programme neu installieren. So auch Photoshop Elements 12. Leider versuche ich vergebens auch Premiere Elements 12 zu instal

  • Firefox does not load certain Youtube videos?

    I am running the 08/05/2012 build of Nightly and I am unable to load Youtube videos with ads, e.g. VeVo videos. I have tried disabling all add-ons and that did not resolve the issue. Videos work fine on Chrome and IE. How should I approach this?