Tax Calculation on Base amount in FB60
Dear All,
My client wants to calculate tax on base amount in FB60,
he receives invoice from vendor with 6 items(i.e., 6 different types of expenses gl)
and in that invoice he get the total tax amount not individual tax amount, here is the example :
item 1 - 1402.50
item 2 - 855.50
item 3 - 3780.00
Sub total - 6038.00
Tax 19% - 1147.22 (tax amount for above 3 items)
Total - 7185.22
In FB60 the system is calculating the tax on net value i.e., we have to enter the total amount (7185.22) in header level and line item we have to enter the amount including the tax value
item 1 - 1668.98 (1402.50 x 19%) - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same.
item 2 - 1078.05 (855.50x 19%) - - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
item 3 - 4498.20 (3780 x 19%) - - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
he is getting this type of invoices more and he dont want to do calculation for each and every item
Please advice on this issue as early as possible.
Thanks in advance
Regards
JS
Thanks a lot Pascol
Regards
JS
Similar Messages
-
Tax procedure for VAT calculation on Base amount + WHT amount
Hi All,
Needed your inputs on definition of tax procedure, to calculate VAT tax where base amount + withholding tax amount are tax base components.
E.g. in AR line item:
Revenue: 950 (FB70 ->Editing options: calculate taxes on net amount check box is enabled)
WHT: 50 (5%) (Re-grossing method using)
VAT: 70 (7%)
To achieve as above how to define tax procedure: current procedure definition as below.
StepCounter-Ctyp----Description-From--To
100--0--- -BASB--Base Amount
117--0--- -J1W1Output Tax----100
118--0MWS1-Subtotal--100----117
120--0--- -MWASOutput Tax------118
Please through some light on this.
Thanks in advance.
SKDear all,
Any comments please.
Highly appreciated calculating VAT tax on base amount and WHT (re-grossing up).
Thanks in advance.
SK -
Extended Withholding Tax ( Minimum/maximum Base Amount ) - with accumulati
We are facing problem in posting of vendor Invoice. Actually we have implemented Minimum base amount ( Rs. 75000/- ) at withholding tax type level and accumulation at per year in withholding tax type A1 ( for testing purpose ) and assign the same to a vendor. We have booked some invoices up to RS. 75000/- system working fine, no WHT is deducted. But now we have received a another Invoice Rs. 5000/- and at the time of booking of invoice system giving an error message
I have changed the error message to warning but itu2019s again showing the same error message.
Actually the problem is system calculate the WHT from the beginning of the year to till date and the amount of Vendor invoice is less the than the amount of WHT but itu2019s legal requirement and we have to post the financial entry as mentioned below
Fictitious figures
Vendor Account Dr. Rs, 1500.00 ( Debit instead of credit )
Expense Account Dr. Rs. 5000.00 ( Actual exp. Of Invoice )
WHT Payable Account Cr. Rs. 6500.00 ( Total WHT from the beginning
Please provide the any.
SAP reply
Dear Customer,
We understand your requirement. But the standard SAP system does not support a scenario where an invoice amount in lower than the tax amount.
This is not a localization specific requirement. The accumulation logic is a generic system behaviour and all countries use it. We cannot make any change in the standard in this regard and change the current system behaviour.
Option to handle this in the system
The only way this can be handled in the system is once the accumulation limit has been reached, use a separate tax type tax code with out accumulations.
Though this is not the ideal solution, this is the best possible solution for your requirement.
Accumulation is not localized for India and the standard solution vailable for all the countries is used by Indian customers too.
SAP is currently not looking at any enhancements to this feature.
Other than the option mentioned above, there is no other way of handling this in the system.
Best Regards,
Soumya
If any one have any otehr solution please inform us.This cannot be possible for two reasons.
1. If you are not able to recover the amount from the Vendor, you'll have to bear it yourself which is a loss to the company.
2. Even if such a process is provided, you cannot alter the previous invoices and your EWT amount does not correspond to the invoice you account for. SAP works in an assumption that Tax will be calculated as a % of base price and cannot exceed it.
The only way to mitigate this is to decide whether a Vendor would require this exemption to be declared based on past experience and past amount of transactions in the beginning itself. If it is unlikely, better do not declare the accumulation limit for them. This will save you from incurring loss and reducing the risk for the company. Start deducting right from the beginning.
If you are not sure, instead of giving accumulation, you can declare exemption upto 75000. In this case, SAP cannot check whether the Vendor has crossed the limit or not. You'll have to manually check and pass a Debit note to that extent when he exceeds the limit. Again, this does not evade the risk of loss for the company. Also, you cannot do TDS post processing for this amount (like TDS Remittance challan, TDS Certificate etc).
So, in my opinion, try and decide if the Vendor would require accumulation right in the beginning itself. Even if not able to decide, you can still deduct the tax and issue a TDS certificate, which the Vendor can claim refund based on his transactions with you from the Income Tax in case he does not exceed the limit. This will limit the risk of loss for the company.
Ravi. -
Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost (hence accrual KEY can't be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount for Tax condition type (BASB).
Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
(Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
Ex - PBXX = 100 base price
Freight = 20
Tax base amnt = 120
Tax (5%)= 6
Total = 126
Other Charges= 10 (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the the amount after Tax base calculation)Hi,
Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
Regards,
AKPT -
Calculation of withholding tax after the certain amount
Hello all,
I would like to ask you when you can customize the settings for withholding tax. We have received the request to set a new witholdng tax which should calculate after $1000 before IVA (if invoice before iva is $1001 should calculate withholding) if the amount is 1000, it should not calculate the withholding tax.
Is it possible? so far its set with base amount 100% and calculation witholdng tax rate: 5%, posting indicator 1.
thanks a lot for your appreciated feedback
regards
HanaDear,
Please use minimum and maximum amounts for your requirement in withholding tax calculation, go to spro-->financial account >financial accounting gs>withholding tax >extended withholding tax> calculation>min/max amounts>define min/max for types.
Here, give the mini amount as 1000. Now check how the system will calculate. -
Withholding tax base amount problem
Hi experts,
I have WT configured like this:
Base amount: Gross
No accumulation
Minimum/maximum: Type level (both)
Central inv. prop. + Check min. base amnt at pmnt doc level
In minimum/maximum per Withholding tax type: Minimum base amount "$500"
The problem occurs when i try to pay an $250 invoice , the system calculates withholding tax for this case but it shouldnu2019t (because the invoice amount is less than $500). This vendor has only one invoice to pay.
The weird thing is this problem happen only for a few vendors, i´ve created a test vendor, exact the same as the "problem vendor" and for the new one, the system is not calculating the withholding tax (its working fine)... I donu2019t know what else should i see...
Thanks in advance
JorgeSteve,
My problem is when i try to pay an invoice smaller than the minimum base amount, the system calculates the WHT. This problem is only with a few vendors, but others, with same master data are working fine. I never did changes in those vendor master data, so the program its no necesary in this case.
Thanks for answering.
Regards,
Jorge -
Hi Friends,
we are not the getting the base amount for import taxes invoice .when we booking the invoice system has to calculate the import tax with the base amount but now the field is not appearing in the screen kindly help.
thanksHello All,
please reply for our query.
why system is not calculating the BASE amount for import GL account . -
Tax Procedure - Condition Base Value Inclusive Freight
Hi Experts,
I have created a routine and assigned it in Tax Procedure - BASB Condition Type.
In that routine i have written the coding like ZWRBTR = XKAWRT.
Here XKAWRT holds the value as Net Value + Freight Value.
Problem is while opening Purchase Order in Change Mode,
If i directly go to Taxes Tab the Base Amount of the BASB condition type is displaying as 0.
But the Material No and the item No are displayed correctly.
But if i go to the Conditions Tab then Taxes tab this value is getting updated.
My Doubts are
Do we need to assign the routine in Pricing Procedure also?
While opening in change mode the values are already saved in the database,
then why does the standard program is not picking the value to screen?
Am i need to write any logic in my routine to achieve the above?
Regards,
Ragunathan.RHi,
Its not helping to solve my requirement.
Can i get the links for assigning the routine in appropriave condition types in Purchase Order.
Regards,
Ragunathan.R -
Base amount for tax calculation in billing document
Dear Experts,
Can you help me in this scenario
when i create a billing document
Selling Price :74,766.36
Output Tax: 5233.65
Final Amount: 80,000.01
the total should be 80,000 in this case as per customer PO.
the actual difference is coming from Tax rounding off done by SAP.Initially we added DIFF condition to adjust the Tax amount.
But it is affecting the Output VAT report, where it shows 0.01 values. business does not want that, so we added DIFF condition to Selling Price.
Net 74,766.35 THB
Tax 5,233.65
This is how it post to accounting
01 8000485 Custome. 80,000.00
50 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 74,766.36-
50 2623600 Output Tax 5,233.65-
40 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 0.01
But the base amount for tax calculation is not chaning even after adding DIFF condition.
Tax amount Base amnt Tx Tax ra
5,233.65- 74,766.36- O7 7.000
Output Tax rate 7%
Is it possible to change the base amount for tax calculation to include DIFF value?
Can you please advise? If i maintain Tax condition at header level, does this solve it.
Regards
PradeepHi,
Please check your condition type settings for Rounding Rule
may be it is marked as commercial
mark as B and check it might work -
Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly
Dear Friends,
While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
Thanks,
Hari DharenThank you Mani Kumar,
But that's what we already have in customizing:
The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
51,000*3% = 1,530
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
F110 Proposal generated:
It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
(only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
Thanks -
Tax Base amount calculation in MIRO
Hi friends ,
Need your help on the following issue
1. PO item price is Rs 20/- & Tax is 7 % . But Tax 7 % should be calculated on Rs 100/- (20+80 =100) in MIRO . i.e. Assessable value for tax is Rs 100/-
2. We tried this scenario in the following way .
Enter the tax amount as Rs 7/- (7% on Rs 100/) ,
Do not ticket u201CCalculate taxu201D ,
Enter the u201CTotal Amountu201D as Rs 27/- ( Rs 20+7)can put
It is working fine. But when we take report to submit government officials, for this PO line item the assessable value is showing as Rs 20/- (PO value) and the tax 7% on this assessable value shows as Rs 1.4/- though the tax value is Rs 7/- .
Could some one help how to face this issue
Thx
DevaIf your tax procedure is TAXINN,
Define new condition type with Cond Class B & Cal Type C.
Define new condtion table and access sequence for this condition type.
Include this tax condition type in Tax procedure.
It is to be included next to BASB. This condition type to be maintained as statistical in TAXINN.
Maintain condition record on required combination.
In third step of TAXINN, give the summation of BASB & new condition type.
Use this third step as the assessable value for tax calculation.
In your case,
STEP Condition type Value
10 BASB = 20 (From PO Item Price)
20 New condition type = 80 (From condition Record)
30 Assesable Value = 100 (STEP 10 + STEP 20)
40 Tax condition type = 7 (7% FROM STEP 40)
Then go for PO-GR-MIRO as regular procedure.
Hope this works for you. -
Charging service tax on part amount in FB60
Hi
I am booking one vendor invoice. Invoice amount is Rs.1060 (Rs. 660 is some printing stationary material (including VAT Rs.60) and Rs.400 is service charge.
Now i have to charge this entire bill to printing stationary GL account. and Rs. 60 to VAT receivable account.
I went to FB60. Entered details and ticked on "Calculate tax" but i did not selected VAT Tax code in header level.
I went to line item (for entering expense GL account). I selected Printing Stationary GL account, entered Rs.1060 and selected 10% VAT Tax code.
But the problem is that VAT is getting calculated on entire bill. One solution i thought that i will enter two line items (i.e 660 and 400). But user is not ready to accept this.
I tried changing layout for for "tax" tab for entering base amount. But its not comming. Is there anyway where i can enter base amount for Tax calculation.Hi
I was talking of VAT Returns. if you enter With Holding Tax Amount manually, there is no issue. I was talking of the std report for VAT returns RFUMSV00. This report uses the Function Module CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_NET_AMOUNT to display tax amounts and if you enter anything manually, which is not calculated by the system, the same will not be displayed and the returns will not be correct.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
Edited by: Sanil K Bhandari on Jul 21, 2011 7:03 PM -
Hi Team
We have a requirement of changing the base amount for tax calulation so i have done the settings in SPRO -Tax on Sales/Purchases-change field control for Tax Base amount.Now i am able to post the entry by changing the base amount
Eg: Base amount-1000
Tax is 4.3% (4,2,1)
Tax to be calculated on Rs.500 only
now we can go and change the Tax base amount to 500 and select tax code in TAX tab by giving calulated tax amount also
when i simulate the same the calculated tax amount is not getting splitted to seprate GL's as we maintain seprate GL for capturing 4,2,1 %
kindly guide is there any way to post the type of entries or any other config i need to do
thanks & regardsMake sure you using one of the following transactions....
FB50
FB60
FB70
MIRO
FB65
FB75
You can not use transaction like F-02, FB01, F-43 etc....
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?
Dear All,
I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
Where I am doing wrong?
please guide.
Using:
SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
Location : India.
Thanks.Hi ,
maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
1846344 - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
Symptom
This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
Solution
Patch installation options:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
Patch content:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
Patch download:
Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
Header Data
Released On
02.05.2013 02:34:18
Release Status
Released for Customer
Component
SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade
Priority
Recommendations/additional info
Category
Upgrade information
References
This document refers to:
SAP Business One Notes
1482452
IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
1650289
Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
1678528
Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
1754529
Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
1756263
Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
1757641
Year-end closing
1757690
SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
1757898
Incoming Bank File Format
1757904
Outgoing Bank File Format
1762860
Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
1770690
Pro Forma Invoice
1776948
Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
1780460
OINM column description is not translated
1780486
UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
1788256
Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
1788372
ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
1788818
RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
1790404
Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
1791295
B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
1791416
Adding a new item to BoM is slow
1794111
Text is overlapping in specific localization
1795595
Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
1797292
Queries in alerts should support more query results
1800055
B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
1802580
Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
1803586
Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
1803751
Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
1804340
LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
1805554
G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
1806576
Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
1807611
Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
1807654
Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
1808694
BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
1809398
CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
1809758
Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
1810099
Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
1811270
Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
1811846
Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
1812344
Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
1812740
DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
1813029
US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
1813835
Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
1814207
Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
1814860
Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
1815535
RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
1815810
GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
1816191
BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
1816611
CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte -
Creation of Service Tax code 10.30% on the 25% of the Base Amount
Dear Team,
We want to create a service tax code of 10.3% on the 25% of the Base amount.
Base Amount - 100.00
25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
25*10.30% = 2.57
Base amount --> 100.00
Service Tax --> 2.57
Total: 102.57
Can somebody let me how to create the service tax code for this.
Regards,
Siva.Hi Randeep,
As they said it is service tax GTA.Right we are doing out of SAP, we want it to be done in SAP
The tax calculation will be like below
service tax of 10.3% has to caluclate on the 25% of the Base amount. Like
25% is taxable and 75% is livied.
Base Amount - 100.00
25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
25*10.30% = 2.57
Base amount --> 100.00
Service Tax --> 2.57
Total: 102.57
Regards,
Siva.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there an application where I can back up all my info that I have on my computer so I don't have to buy a external hard drive?
-
Hi, I've created a 20x20 image of the background color I want, upload it to KM, and then use that in the Background Image parameter of the XML form. (the Background Repeat Mode is set to Repeat.) It doesn't seem to work .any idea why ? Regards, Hadar
-
Synchronise purchases across devices with multiple apple ID.
I connect to iTunes with different apple ID, how do I get all my purchases across all my devises? Thanks
-
Hi, I am trying to add Deep Linking to the large Flex3 app (it has one main HTML file and collection of dashboards selects one via ComboBox). so I would like to be able to send a link like http://myserver/myapp.html#/dashboard1 New to SWFAddress, so
-
Minimize / Maximize / Close controls missing
I just auto-upgraded to 10.0 on my Windows 7 (64 bit Home Premium). The top right window controls have disappeared. How do I get them back? BTW this was the worst upgrade yet, problems occurred with the pinned shortcut and in the start menu. Norton g