Tax codes not flowing into the PO

Hi
We are using EBP 4.0.
We are using the classic scenario. In the EBP system we have defined the tax codes and done the mapping to the tax codes in the backend system.
We are creating a shopping cart and entering a tax code.The tax value gets calculated and is displayed in the SC.This goes for approval and creates a PR in the backend system.The PR is converted to PO.Here the PO gets saved without tax code. Even for Invoice the tax values dont show.
Can you let me know what is to be done.

Hello,
As far I know, there is no tax for a PR.
You could transfer the tax defined in the SC only when you create directly a PO.
Rgds,
Pierre

Similar Messages

  • Tax code value is not flowing into the netprice of the PO

    HI,
    Tax percentage are calculating correctly but the final value is refelected to my pricng procedure and adding on to the net price of the PO,what should I do to bring the tax value to NAVS condition of the pricing procedure.
    Regards
    Kantha

    Hii,
    Check the tax procedure and the condition type assigned with the tax code which you are using. Please provide more details like u r using CIN & TAXINN???
    Regards,

  • Tax code not flowing while ME59N in case of conversion of service PR to PO

    Hello,
    I am trying to create automatic PO using ME59N for Service PR. But system is showing an error Tax code is not found. In my case I cannot create Contract. I have to maintain Service conditions in ML33 from which the Service amount will flow. Everything else is working fine, except that I cannot bring the tax code. My vendor is ERS vendor. So the tax code is manadatory and I don't want to remove the check.
    Please suggest how to bring the tax code automatically? I have tried creating inforecord using the material group of the service. But it has not worked.
    Please help. Useful suggestions will be awarded.

    I have found a solution in standard itself

  • Items are not flowing into the second master page.

    Hello,
    any help on this is really appreciated. this is the situation. There are two master pages. I have created a flow content subform. And within this, i have created a position content subform. Within this, i have the different fields of an item level table. There are a total of 14 records. three pages are used. And all the three are the first master page. The second master page is not being used. I have tried many ways, but could not suceed. Could any one out there suggest a way to solve this problem?

    Hello,
    I'm facing a problem here. Within my print form I have one master page.
    Basically I have a dynamic table which must be followed by a standard text.
    So I've created a subform (flow content), in it I have another subform (flow content, table): in it one subform (flow content, table row) and a subform (position content with my text).
    Although all the 'allow page breaks' are checked, the issue I have is that the second page is never printed...

  • Item line data not flowing into SAP Adobe form layout

    Hello Gurus,
    I am currently working on adobe form layout for a sales document in SAP, i have created a master page
    as well as a couple of pages in the design view. Data at the header level are working properly, but the item data
    are not flowing into the layout, as nothing appears in the print preview for the item level of the sales document.
    I have done all the necessary binding with all the right field names, my subform to the best of my knowledge seems to be well
    defined, but yet to no avail.
      I would like to know what yet could be the reason for this issue and how i can go about fixing it.
    Thank you.
    Ahm.

    Hi Vijai,
    In our project, we have the same requirement but I am one step behind than you. I am able to generate the PDF form but not able to generate the data. Means all the fields are coming as disabled fields.
    Can you please send your code as a sample code so that I can have a look at that and check where I am doing wrong/missing. My id is sandeep.kamdar in gmail
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sandip Kamdar

  • Group Memberships not Flowing into Metaverse

    Hello,
    I'm trying to figure out why the group member attributes in the CS are not flowing into the MV.  Here's what I have:
    An HR system running on SQL Server
    A staging database that extract data from the HR system
    The staging database has a table representing person object
    The stating database has a table representing person multi-valued attributes (i.e location, job code, etc)
    The staging database has a table representing group objects
    The staging database has a table representing group memberships (mult-valued)
    A SQLMA connected to the person and person multi tables
    A SQLMA connected to the group and group membership tables
    All group memberships are based on job codes and locations.  There are no approval process in place.  If they have this job code, they get certain groups.  That's all calculated in the staging database and the memberships are in the group membership
    table
    This system does connect to AD (and a few other things), but I'm not concerned with that, right now.
    I've read 100 articles on this, most of them over 5 years old, and tried the ones that made sense.  The flow from the database into the CS works well.  No issues there.
    But, a search of the metaverse for the group shows an empty member attribute.  The sync process is not throwing any errors.  At least they're not showing up in the sync service app or the event logs.
    Where allowed, I'm using rules extensions for everything.  I can't use a rules extension to set the member attribute because it's an rdn.
    I'm going to move forward with this by extending the metaverse schema and adding a multi-valued string attribute named "memberOf" to the person object.  Then, I'll modify my existing MA to use that attribute instead of the member attribute. 
    I'm not sure what kind of issues I'm going to run into when exporting that to AD.  I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.  I don't anticipate that being an issue as the dns for all these objects will be calculated by the ADMA based on locations,
    group functions and person types (bascially, I don't care about the MV rdn).
    Anyway, I'm looking for some real world insight on this.  This whole effort is to migrate off an existing IDM system that works very, very well but quite expensive to license.
    Thanks,
    Greg Wilkerson

    Hey Cameron,
    I have total control of all the DB tables FIM is accessing.  I build them up as part of IDM process.
    I've read this article, along the many others that address the "manager" scenario.  This really doesn't apply in this case as the user and group objects are loaded in separate MAs.  Getting reference values to flow with both object live in the
    same CS shouldn't be an issue. 
    I also saw a solution where the group and user objects were in the same table and differentiated by the "object_type" value (user, group).  That solution solved the issue of the groups and user being in the same CS.  As I grow tired of my daily
    FIM beatdown, that solution is growing more attractive.  That's a major DB redesign, and seems quite inefficient.
    The multi-value table for group memberships already exists in the DB.  For FIM purposes, I transferred that data into the user object multi-value table.  See screen shot.  I can certainly configure the group MA to access that multi-value table
    and load the group members as references.  But, because the group MA CS will not contain the user objects, I don't see how the references will be set.  If the reference value isn't set in the CS, it's not going to flow into the MV (at least I haven't
    figured out a way to set the an reference value for an object in the MV - my problem all along.
    This whole "setting a reference value" encompasses much more than just group memberships in my implementation.  Telephone resources and physical access (key cards, etc) are provisioned through the existing eDirectory system.  These objects exist
    in our current IDM system and are associated with users based on rules.  So, the reference value process is something I need to figure out, if I'm going to use this product.
    Maybe I could use a stripped down ECMA2 as a "staging" CS, export the users and groups into this CS and assign the reference values, then import the groups back into the MV, memberships intact.  I'm not sure that would get me where I want to go, and
    it seems like a lot of extra "stuff" to solve what should be a simple problem.  Hmmmmmm.  Or, connect the ECMA2 directly to my group membership multi-value table in the DB.  Hmmmmmm.  I'd still have to export the groups and users into that
    CS, but the import might be much more straight forward.  Hmmmmmm.
    The structure of my GroupMembership table (both columns are anchors or directly translatable to anchors):
    EmployeeGroups
        GroupName varchar(50) not null,
        EmployeeID nvarchar(50) not null,
        ID int identity(1,1) not null

  • Gross & Net Weight not flowing into sales order

    Hi all,
    When i am creating a sales order the Gross weight and Net weight is not flowing into the sales document. i have checked the material master it was maintained properly and item category also it is checked.
    if you have any solution please post.
    thanks in advance
    Sri

    Hi,
    The unit you're using into sales order is the same of material master?
    If not, the unit conversion is mantained in material master?
    What kind of material type r you using?
    There are "order quantity"? (sorry for that silly question...)
    I think when double checking those itens probably you will find the solution.
    Regards,
    deme

  • Condition type not flown(not determined) into the sales order

    Hello Experts,
    There is one discount condition type which is having proper condition records, validity date.However, it is not getting determined properly and is not flown into the sales order. the user wants to know why this may happen.I tried to reason it may be the sales order date and the conditon record date may be different or the condition record is changed after the creation of the sales order.neither of the reasons seem to hold good. any ideas?
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hello,
    I have looked into the analysis and asked him to update the condition by clicking on that.also, I found that the condition record is having a proper valid date. now the user would update only after knowing the exact reason why it did not flow into the sales order,he knows he has to update the condition but would not do so till he knows the right reason why condition is not determined in the sales order. now this is the situation.
    the probable reasons as per analysis of the conditon type are as follows(for your information). can it be one ofThere are different reasons for this:
    1)The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
    2)The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.  them?
    Regards,
    Raj.

  • FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

    Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
    Hi Frnds.
    I have a typical problem.
    Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
    But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
    The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
    I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
    Let me know where the error lies.
    Here is the scenario
    00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
    01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
    02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        -  35518 -  35180 -  35332
    03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
    04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
    05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04)  -  15671 -   0     -  0
    05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04)  -    0    -  19401 -  0
    05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    -  17719
    INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
    Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
    By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
    Regards
    Krishna
    Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

    Hi Vivek
    Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
    By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
    I will give you full points.
    Once again thanks a lot.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Tax and pricing info are not flowing into Idoc orders02-eledp04 and 05

    Hi,
    We are carrying out SRM5.5 -SUS and ECC6.0 Integration using PI 7.
    We are configuring for the MM-SUS Scenario.
    Now,to accomodate the Tax / Pricing we have installed the add on
    component LOCINSUS and we are having doubts on how to use it:
    1) Tax and pricing information are not flowing into IDOC- orders02
    (e1edp04 and e1edp05 segments are not present in the created IDOC). The
    condition print indicator in checked on ECC System and we have also
    implemented SAP note 995986.
    2)In create ASN transaction , we are not able to see the Excise Invoice
    Number and Date field in Basic data tab as expected from SAP Library
    document although we have installed the Localization Add on component.
    Please help us to reso1ve these issues,
    Regards,
    Mani
    099890-22217.

    Mani,
    Did you resolve this issue, because we are having the same issue in ECC6 with IDoc ORDERS02.
    If you did resolve this issue could you please let us know how, much appreciated.
    Bill.

  • Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

    Dear Experts,
    I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
    Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
    Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
    Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
    Thanks and Regards
    Mansih

    Hi,
    Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
    During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then  you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

    Dear Friends,
    While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
    thanks
    Sasi

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
    Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
    In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
    In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
    or
    Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
    Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
    Thanks
    Sasi

  • Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module

    Dear Team,
    I am new to the PS module..... Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module. Kindly let me know the missing configuration steps.
    Thanks !!!

    Sagar Kapadia wrote:
    > 1) What is the pre-requisite configuration for activation of Commitments and Project Cash management in the PS system?
    > 2) Is there any word of caution which needs to be kept in mind at the time of activation?
    > 3) once activated, what will the impact on the data? Are there any chances of data inconsistency?
    >
    Only one pre-requisite is the creation of FM area.
    As I suggested earlier, please read SAP help which will answer all your queries.
    Please follow the below path...
    SAP Help Portal >>> SAP ERP Central Component >>> Financials >>> Project System >>> Payments >>> Project Cash Management.

  • Material delta changes are not flowing into CRM

    Dear All,
    material delta changes are not flowing into CRM, because the product hierarchy on material has been changed to a new product hierarchy. I do not want to download again the object DNL_CUST_PROD1 because it maight cause inconstancies in CRM. (I have already defined some z product hierarchies in CRM)
    Do I need to create the new product hierarchy also in CRM manually?
    Appreciate any inputs
    Raj

    Hi Raj,
    Use the transacrion R3AR2 to create a z object for DNL_CUST_PROD1 and assign DNL_CUST_PROD1 as the object name
    Then in request detail screen for new z object enter the details like table name (T179 in your case) and the name of the product hierarchy that you want to bring in. Save the transaction
    Then use the transaction R3AR4 to initiate the download for your new z object as you normally do in R3AS.
    Then go to SMW01 and reprosess the struck Bdoc.
    Reward points if helps,
    Regards,
    Paul Kondaveeti

  • Billing document are not flowing into FI and COPA

    Hello SAP CO gurus,
    please help me out by giving possible reasons why Billing document are not flowing into FI and COPA.
    what are the settings need to check?
    is there any option to get release by manual?
    Initiatives rewards with points........
    Regards
    Chandra.

    Hello Chandra,
    Check whether any standard cost estimate is existing for that material for which your billing. If it is there then check whether costing key from COPA is able to access the cost estimate.
    I am also working on the same issue but not solved yet.
    regards
    Nivas

Maybe you are looking for