Tax jurisdiction 0 has incorrect length

Hi All,
I am getting following error whil posting billing document in to accounting.could any one suggest this how to resolve.(we are maintaining condition type UTXJ Value is zero)
ERROR;Tax jurisdiction 0 has incorrect length.

Hello;
Please be aware that if shipping from the US to a non juristiction
country the system should take a dummy jurisdiction code from the OBCL
transaction.
You have the situation that the product will be delivered from 'US'
to country 'BR'. If both countries are using the tax jurisdiction
functionality then it could be that the length is different in these
countries    as a solution in that export case the default tax
jurisdiction code from OBCL will be taken. Please check this.
Please also check the tax configuration in transaction FTXP.
Please ensure however that for each revenue line passed to accounting
that a tax line exists also otherwise error FF805 will be generated.
The tax code will be transferred to the conditions according to the
description of note 112609 - - therefore statistical items will not be
passed to accounting, and conditions with condition base value that is 0
are not passed to FI either.
IN SUMMARY:
-> There must be at least a revenue line for each tax line.
-> For each revenue line containing a certain tax indicator there
   must be a tax line with this indicator.
-> If a tax condition has base value = 0 OR is inactivated OR is
   statistical => then it is not passed to FI.
I hope it can help you.
Regards
Ruy Castro

Similar Messages

When opening the Coloursync utility and pressing the verify button, I received an error message stating that the Tag 'cprt':Text tag has an incorrect length which could not be fixed as the file is locked. Does anyone know how to rectify this?

When opening the Coloursync utility and pressing the verify button, I received an error message (copy below) stating that the Tag 'cprt':Text tag has an incorrect length which could not be fixed as the file is locked. Does anyone know how to rectify this?
Checking 25 profiles...
/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/Displays/iMac-00000610-0000-9C6C-0000-000004271B00.i cc
   Tag 'cprt': Text tag has an incorrect length.
   The file is locked. Could not be fixed.

Hi guys,
I followed the steps to unlock the .icc file in the "getinfo" screen then went on clicking repair in colorsync utility.
This is the message i got:
Searching for profiles...
Checking 17 profiles...
/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/Displays/Color LCD-00000610-0000-9CF3-0000-000004273CC0.icc
   Tag 'cprt': Text tag has an incorrect length. Fixed.
Repair done - 1 profiles fixed.
However, when i hit verify again it shows up like this:
Searching for profiles...
Checking 17 profiles...
/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/Displays/Color LCD-00000610-0000-9CF3-0000-000004273CC0.icc
   Tag 'cprt': Text tag has an incorrect length.
Verify done - found 1 bad profile.
... and it keeps like this sine die.
when i open the .icc file it shows up like this:
3     'cprt'     'text'     35     Copyright ASCII Text String
New to mac so I really don't know what to do.
I didn't get this message so far. What i did before getting this message was to open a jpeg file. I wanted to edit it so when i did right click on the file i went to open with, and colorsync came as an option; so i chose it.
Then this message started comming up.
Is there anything i can do?
Thabks for the support.

While doing MIRO i am getting an error: Enter a tax jurisdiction code

Hi,
While doing a MIRO, i am getting an error :
Enter a tax jurisdiction code
Message no. M8757
How to Resolve
Pratik

Hi
Try this
1.To enter the tax amounts of the G/L account items, choose Extras ® Tax amounts. The Tax Amounts screen appears.
You can branch to this screen at any point during document entry.
The Tax Amounts screen shows the tax amount, tax code, posting key, tax base amount, and jurisdiction code for all the items already entered. When you call up this screen after entering the G/L account items, it displays the amounts that have already been entered.
2.You can now choose how you want to enter the taxes.
The tax jurisdiction codes represent the different taxing authorities to which you submit payment for taxes EG: the state, county, city etc.
In SAP you can have as many as 4 levels. Configuration is done in 2 steps :
First step :
The tax jurisdiction structure (structure of the tax code) is set up with following menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > specify structure for tax jurisdiction code.
Alternatively you can use t-code OBCO
This step allows you the enter the character length of your various level of hierarchy within your tax jurisdiction code structure (State 2 char, county 3, city 4, etc...).
Second step:
You configure the tax jurisdiction code using the structure defined earlier, menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > define tax jurisdiction codes.
Alternatively t-code OBCP
Define your tax jurisdiction codes, EG GA0000000 for Georgia, GA001000 for Georgia, douglas county, GA001001 for georgia, douglas county, city of lithia springs.

Tax Jurisdiction in SAP CRM 7.0 B2C Webshop as an optional field.

Hi Everyone,
We are trying to register a user in B2C Webshop .In the process of registering, On entering the postal Code and corresponding city , the application shows an error message which says " Tax Jurisdiction could not be detremined" .
Going ahaed, we could like some clarity on the same .It would also be relevant if we could make this postal code/City as an optional filed in the System.We need clarity on making this as an optional field.
KIndly give your inputs if any one has worked on the same functionality.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sanjib paul

See if the configuration settings at (Tcode SPRO)
CRM--> Master Data --> Business Partner --> Specify handling of error messages helps.
Also see my replies in other threads on suppressing or showing CRM messages in the web (ISA) layer.
Re: Product not viewable in catalog nor in search function but still orderable
Re: Minimum order quan - CRMC_MSGC
Re: Minimum order quan - CRMC_MSGC

Tax Jurisdiction In B2C Webshop (SAP CRM 7.0) as an optional field.

Hi Everyone,
We are trying to register a user in B2C Webshop .In the process of registering, On entering the postal Code and corresponding city , the application shows an error message which says " Tax Jurisdiction could not be detremined" .
Going ahaed, we could like some clarity on the same .It would also be relevant if we could make this postal code/City as an optional filed in the System.We need clarity on making this as an optional field.
KIndly give your inputs if any one has worked on the same functionality.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sanjib paul

See if the configuration settings at (Tcode SPRO)
CRM--> Master Data --> Business Partner --> Specify handling of error messages helps.
Also see my replies in other threads on suppressing or showing CRM messages in the web (ISA) layer.
Re: Product not viewable in catalog nor in search function but still orderable
Re: Minimum order quan - CRMC_MSGC
Re: Minimum order quan - CRMC_MSGC

You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US

Hi All,
We are having this message popping up "You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US" when we try to add an item to a shopping cart. SRM 4.0 Classic scenario.
Also when i process the shopping cart and create a PO out of it, our R/3 4.6C dosnot let me release the PO and error message is :"no tax jurisdiction code found"
I have looked at some of the earlier threads but i could not find a definite solution. Has anybody faced similar problems? Please let me know !
Thanks
Sundeep

Hi Sudeep,
How did it work? Do you have to implement any BADI's or SRM or R/3 side? As we are getting same error while creating Shopping Cart in SRM.
I have checked the plant data in R/3 and Jurisdiction code has been maintained there.
Please advise
Thank you
Ritesh

Tax jurisdiction

Hi All,
I would like know if given county has more than one tax jurisdiction and if more than one Tax jurisdiction available for a county, i would like to display them.
I have tried with function module TAX_TXJCD_GET_EX_JURCODE_LIST but i was unsuccessful.
can any body provide help in this regard.
DATA: p_list type TABLE OF TAX_TXJCD_LOCATION_LIST.
DATA: BEGIN OF p_list1 OCCURS 0.
           INCLUDE STRUCTURE COM_JUR.
DATA: END OF p_list1.
DATA: SYSTEM LIKE SY-SYSID.
CALL FUNCTION 'TAX_TXJCD_GET_EX_JURCODE_LIST'
EXPORTING
     IM_COUNTRY = 'US'
     IM_REGION = 'NJ'
     IM_ZIPCODE = '07095'
     IM_CITY = ''
     IM_COUNTY = ''
IMPORTING
     EX_LOCATION_RESULTS = p_list1
EXCEPTIONS
      INPUT_INCOMPLETE
      NO_TAX_PROCEDURE
      NO_TAXJURCODE_REQUIRED
      RFCDEST_NOT_FOUND
      TAXJURCODE_NOT_FOUND
      NO_EXTERNAL_SYSTEM_USED
      OTHER_ERROR.

Hi,
Check Function Modules:
TAX_TXJCD_GET_KALSM
TAX_TXJCD_DETERMINE_CHECK
TAX_TXJCD_HELP_VALUE
TAX_TXJCD_DETERMINE_TABLE

Tax jurisdiction code

Hi All,
I have PO number against which Invoice has been genrated. I need to know how can we find the tax calculated based upon Tax Code and Tax Jurisdiction Code.
Also need to know how can we determine Tax Code and Tax Jurisdiction Code from PO number.
Help urgently required. Reward points for all the helpful answers.
Thanks
Hari

Here is additional input:
We are integrating MDG-Supplier with Data Service (DQM) for the address standardization and duplicate check. This is working fine.
We are exploring options to also populate the tax jurisdiction code (based on the address entered) of the vendor master. One of the suggestions was see if SAP Data Services can do this ?
The tax jurisdiction code needs to be determined in real time while the user is entering/change the address in the MDG UI

Syst allows, using both old & new tax jurisdiction codes on PO after Vertex

Hello All,
We have recent gone for Vertex implementation in our concern and have an interface with SAP.
Now , after the implementation, system allows me to use both old and new tax jurisdiction codes on POs. This will be an issue so can someone help me and let me know if any note has to be applied or any other solution.
Thanks in advance
Arun

There is difference between old and new Jurisdiction codes because as per Vertex GEO codes to SAP jurisdiction codes, there are 2 differences.
1) The first 2 characters in Vertex are the GEO numeric code (i.e. 01 = AL in SAP), and
2) There is an additional zero at the end of the jurisdiction code in SAP TTXJ table.
Example: Vertex 010030420 equals AL00304200 in SAP.
Thanks
Arun

INVOIC idoc error 51due to "Enter a tax jurisdiction code"

Hi Expeets
We use INVOIC for automated MIRO for an interco STO.
Th idoc is unsuccessful due to message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code"
The tax jurisdiction code is already there in PO item and it is getting determined in MIRO item when we manually create invoice.
Please guide me to avoid this error with Idoc.
thanks
ramSiva

Hi ramSiva,
You will need to do a test with the IDoc to see if it is processed correct when you fill the tax jurisdiction code. Then you will now that you need to adjust the code for processing the IDoc.
If it still goes wrong then there is something else incorrect.
I am not a functional consultant, but maybe these are customizing settings where the taks code is made mandatory. Check with your functional consultant, maybe he knows the rules for this field in relation to customizing settings.

R12 Ebtax upgrade- did not upgrade the Tax Jurisdictions

we have upgraded from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1.1 . The setup has been migrated to R12 Ebtax
But Dont see the tax Jurisdiction created at all ? why the system did not automatically create the Jurisdiction like it created the other components of Tax Configuration. How does this impact
I see a note 460059.1 on metalink but there is no error as such when creating manual invoices. the tax calcutates fine.
I have done a fresh tax set up in my previous project where creation of Jurisdiction ws mandatory for the subsequest ebtax setup

ernestokolie wrote:
... downloaded the yosemite fully (5.17GB) but the upgrade did not happened, the os remains the same. . .
The upgrade doesn't simply happen. The Yosemite installer is downloaded to your Applications folder and normally it starts but then waits for you to begin the actual installation. Look in your Applications folder for the installer, double click on it and follow the instructions. Note that when the installation is finished, the installer deletes itself. If you want to keep it for future use, duplicate it first.

No need of Tax Jurisdiction Code

Dear sir
While i create tax code ( FTXP ) Tax Jurisdiction is mandatory field . But I don`t want Jurisdition code .Please help me.
Puru
Edited by: Purushottam Bawane on Sep 25, 2008 1:56 PM

Hi,
Please check the calculation procedure you have defined.
See following settings
IMG > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Tax on Sales/Purchases > Basic Settings > Specify Structure for Tax Jurisdiction Code
Check whether your schema has been assigned for Tax Jurisdiction Code?
Also check Define Tax Jurisdictions
I hope you will get clear
Regards,
Jigar

AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction in FB60

Hello Gurus-
I have a problem/ puzzle I cannot figure out.
For AP invoices, the Tax Jurisdiction is determined by Ship to and all is good. However, when AP attempts to add freight to an invoice via t-code FB60, the tax juirisdiction defaults to plant which is wrong.
Can this be changed to mirror the ship to? Is there a solution to this?
Thank you

Hi,
In FB60, you can not link to Ship to party as it is FI transaction and not related to SD.
Regards,
Gaurav

AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction

Hello AP Guru's-
I have a situation where were are adding line items to an invoice with a PO. The tax jurisdiction code is correct but when we add a G/L, it is pulling the wrong tax jurisdiction code? Where is SAP pulling this tax jurisdiction code from? I assume from Vendor Master but it is wrong? Shouldn't it match the PO?
Thanks!

Upon reviewing the Plant Master data- I found that the PO is pulling the Tax code from by the Plant. However, when the user attempts to add a line item, it is pulling the PO by the Co.code. I am still working on this but it doesn't make any sense. I would expect SAP to be logical in that it would be consistent by PO or by Vendor.
What is the standard 'best practices' method here?
I would suspect that it would be by PO and not by company code via MIRO?
But I did confirm that the PO is by Plant and not Vendor which is correct. In addition, I could not find a way to remove the tax code by plant but I may not want to do that anyway.
My users don't like that the tax code in MIRO when they add a GL line item does not match the PO.
Any suggestions?

When we post Inbound Invoice IDocs, we are getting an error message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code".

Hi Experts,
When we post Inbound Invoice IDocs, we are getting an error message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code". As checked, we have configured OBCD and OBCA for the vendor and we are passing the Tax Jurisdiction code in E1EDP04 SAL segment. Can anybody give us some idea to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Sameek

Hi Sameek,
Please refer the below link. Hope it helps.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1435286
Regards,
Chandan.

Tax jurisdiction 0 has incorrect length

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for