Tax not Calculated on Activity created through Service master

Hi;
For different TAX values on Multiple line items in P.O, i am using Service Master to Create an Activity, and call that activity in my Service entry sheet.
Now When Service entry sheet (P.R) is adopted in P.O it doesn't calculate tax.
Any valuable information on this would be highly appreciated.
Regards.

Hi,
In the purchase order the taxes are calcuated at item level. In the              
service entry sheet the taxes are calculated at service level.
The non-deductible input taxes both in the purchase order and on the             
service entry sheet serve for the commitments structure and for                  
information.                                                                     
The tax actually paid with the invoice is later more precisely                   
redetermined by the invoice verification in the system.                                                                               
You can set the Customizing alternatively that the          
taxes are calculated at service level instead of at item level. This             
setting is particularly useful if different services of an item are to           
be taxed differently as it is the rule in countries with                         
jurisdiction-dependent taxes.  Please check your settings in transaction ML100.
In this connection, refer to Notes 498878, 495316 and 371595.    
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

  • F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

    Dear Gurus,
    For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
    But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
    My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
    Regards
    Prabin

    You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ?  Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ?  This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run.  Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ?  With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

  • Tax not calculating In FB60.

    we are using  Taxinn maintain  plant/vendor/material  in Fv11   for  condition  JVRD  using  single tax code V1. all  VAT calculation   for diffrent  tax rate on single tax code. In  MIRO vat  tax calculating but not In FB60.
    We upgrade The PRD up patch level 21 prior  to up grade patch  tax calculation  was working  in FB60 .
    we are  maintain plant & material at line level, also put business places in fb60.
    we maintain Table  J_1IT030K GL  plant wise & business place  wise with along  with account key JP5.   
    what configuration i have to check for calculation tax in fb60.

    Dear Raj,
    Please check the below suggestion that can be useful:                                                                               
    Point 4 of SAP note  952289 gives a clear idea about this issue.                             
    It is as follows.......                                                                               
    4. For direct posting to FI through the transaction FB60/ FB70, the ta                   
    calculation is not taking place.                                                                               
    Answer: Ensure that the following steps are carried out -                                                                               
    1. Insert the condition table 003 in the access sequence JTAX/JST1                       
    one above the last step.                                                                               
    2. DO NOT MARK IT AS EXCLUSIVE.                                                                               
    3. Create new set of TAX codes to be used in FI only.                                                                               
    4. Maintain condition records for these tax code using the table 003,                    
    through FV11 with the appropriate tax percentage.                                                                               
    Further make sure that the said tax code is present in FTXP and the                      
    same is assigned to your respective company code,in the following                        
    customising node:                                                                               
    SPRO > Logictics general > Tax on goods mvmt > India > Determination                     
    of excise duty > Asssign tax code to company code..                                                                               
    This solution is relevant for all direct tax related postings through                    
    FI.    
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Tax not calculating in PO

    HI MM Gurus,
    I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
    I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
    When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
    Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Saini

    Hi, Neeraj
    The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
    Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
    1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
    2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
    3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
    4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
    Hope this will correct your problem.
    Regards

  • Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
    When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
    I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Pawan Sarda

    Hello
    Thanks for ur Reply.
    MIRO --  Subsequent Debit -
    >Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
    >PO NO. -
    > change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
    > Amount 4000 INR  -
    > also change Tax  Code of Line Item   -
    >Simulate
    Vendor A\c -
    >   4,348.18 INR Cr
    Stock A\c  -
    >  4,000.00 INR Dr
    Service Tax -
    >     338.04 INR Dr
    ECS             -
    >         6.76  INR Dr
    HECS          -
    >       3.38  INR Dr
    Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
    Actual Entry
    Vendor A\c -
    >  4,412.00 INR Cr
    Stock A\c  -
    > 4,000.00 INR Dr
    Service Tax -
    >    400.00 INR Dr
    ECS             -
    >        8.00  INR Dr
    HECS          -
    >      4.00  INR Dr
    Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

  • Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

    Hi
    We are in ECC 6.  In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60.  It works perfectly without any problem.  It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
    We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all.  All settings are as similar as development system.  Vendor master record also similar as development.  The document entered for testing is same as development.
    Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system?  Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
    You suggestion is most impartant.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Dear Venkatasubramanya,
    Check the following Master data in your Test System......
    1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
    2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
    check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
    Best Regards

  • Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

    Hi Experts ,
    We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
    1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
    2)  Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
    Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
    Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
    But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
    Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
    I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
    Pls guide.
    Regards
    Honey

    Hi Ramesh ,
    i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
    In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

  • Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

    Hi Experts,
    We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
    Eg
    Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
    His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
    His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
    For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
    Please provide with your valuable inputs.
    Thanks in Advance
    Koutilya

    Hi,
    Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
    Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
    Annual Regular income is computed as under:
    Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
    Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
    VK

  • TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
    We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
    Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
    The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
    What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
    I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
    Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
    How to achive this, pl help.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    hi
    the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
    now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
    can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
    also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    here what value u have maintained  ,we are using 2 as (2     Different G/L line)
    regards
    kunal
    Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

  • MIRO:Taxes not calculating

    Hi Gurus,
    I am using TAXINN
    Noe PO is done with all cond records
    GR is also fine
    J1IEX is also captured & posted
    But while posting MIRO,when I click on 'Calculate Tax'    the taxes are not calculating,
    Plz suggest
    Rgds
    Vinay

    Hi,
    Go to OB40
    maintain Cenvat Clearing account in for all taxcodes.
    for E.g.
    maintain ECS for Edu Cess, BED and J16 for H Edu cess
    all enteries must be like
    During Excise Invoice Credit            
                                        Cenvat Account           Dr.
                                        Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
                During Invoice Verification
                                        Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
                                        GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
                                        Vendor Payable                      Cr.
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • Buffer table not up to date - Create Model Service Specifications

    Hello, when our user try to create Model Service Specifications in tr. ML10 the following error message is arised:
    "Buffer table not up to date"
    Message no. SE001
    Diagnosis
    An internal error has occurred.
    Procedure
    Exit the function and then reinvoke it.
    If the error should reoccur, please contact your system administrator."
    I cannot any suitable sap notes. Our SAP system is ERP 2005.
    Please advice something.

    Hi Igor ,
    Please check following link which may help you..
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-mm/error-se001-buffer-table-not-up-to-date-2524832?cv=expanded
    Regards,
    Kiran M
    Edited by: Kiran Madhu on Feb 18, 2009 10:25 PM

  • How to remove the Mandatory indicator of Activity Number in Service Master?

    Hi,
    Can some one tell haw can I remove the mandatory indicator of Activity Number field in Service Master (AC03)?
    Regards.

    Hi,
    In ACNR the number range is assigned based on the service category.
    Go to SPRO - MM - External Service management - Service master - Define Service Category, please untick the check box for External Number Assignment Without Validation against the respective Service Category and save.
    Now try creating a new service master using AC01, it will pick the service master No. from the internal number range maintained against the Service Category
    Regards
    Merwyn

  • Pennsylvania Local Service Tax Not Calculating correctly

    I received a TUB  for a local service tax area that is going from a $10 tax to a $52 LST( tax type 084). When I review the BSI interface/ script , I see an additional tax code of a 9 which means to substitute the lump sum for the pro-rated LST amount which is for authorities that have a $10 or less tax.
    The LST is showing up as a lump sum of $52 for /484. In PA the LST is prorated per pay period of $2 per pay period. I need to remove  the Additional Tax Code. Once I do this,  the tax will  calculate as it should in the amount of $2.00.
    Please advise how to remove this additional tax code of 9. I am  referencing TUB # 179.
    Thanks,

    Tax Authority - East Petersburg Borough (PAKV). Tax Type 84, Local Service Tax. When I maintain PAKV on the IT 0207 record it calculates the local withholding.
    I am testing TUB # 205. This particular tax authority is adopting local service tax (84) instead of OPT (51). Effective immediately.
    When we first loaded the TUB and I ran payroll for an employee, the tax area was not pulling in the payroll results. I did the steps I listed in my post and I now get the tax authority pulling in but the $2 bi-weekly deduction is not coming out. I also noticed, the taxable earning is showing $0 thus the tax is showing $0.
    Thanks for your response,,,

  • WH Tax not calculating after Config

    Hi Guys,
    I have configure the WH tax for my company code. I defined the Tax types and tax codes and assigned it to my company code.
    Then i assigned the same tax code in my vendor master and also activated the extended WH tax functionality for my company code.
    However, when i raise an invoice using FB60 the system does not pop up the with holding tax button. Nor does it show the Withholding tax amounts.
    Is there any config missing here?
    Thanks
    Kris..

    Hi
    Please see if you have followed all the below config steps
    1.Check W.Tax Countries
    2. Define Official Witholding Tax Codes
    3. Define Business Place (If more than one TAN No.)
    4. Assign factory calendar to Business Place
    5.Define W.Tax type for Invoice Posting and Payment Posting
    6. Define W.Tax Code for Invoice Posting and Payment Posting
    7.Check Receipiant Types
    8. Maintain Tax due dates
    9. Maintain surcharge calculation method
    10.Maintain Surcharge rates
    11.Assign tax types to company code
    12. Create GL Account - Withholding tax
    13. Assingment of GL Account to Withhold tax
    14. Maintain Document types for challan updatation
    15.Maintain Number ranges group (SAP script forms)
    16.Assign Number ranges to number group
    17. Maintain number ranges
    18. Assign TDS Number in Global Parameters
    19. Assign Tax codes in Vendor Master

  • Taxes not calculation in PO

    Hi,
    We have scenario like this
    Currently we are using 4 tax codes with different combination like V1- Excise + L-VAT 4%, V2- Nil Excise+4% L-VAT, V3 u2013 Excise + C-VAT 12.5% & V4 u2013 Nil Excise+ C-VAT 12.5% Here 4% VAT is local VAT within state & C u2013VAT other state.
    We are using TAXINN procedure I know in this procedure values are not depending on tax code what we maintain in PO. But it will fetch taxes from condition what we maintain in FV11.My actual issue  popping here is when we had created another tax code and maintaining the condition in FV11 with key combination of Material/Plant/Vendor it is not populating in PO when if click tax tab, but when if I change tax code it is showing value with this calculation it is ok and entire cycle is completed successfully but my concern here, it is triggering same GL but we want it to hit different GL as per configuration in OB40 with relevant  account key and combination of tax code and GL  which is the reason we had created separate tax code. What would be reason?
    Regards

    HI,
    Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
    Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
    If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
    Thanks & Regards,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Exception thrown while processing pdf file with composite fonts using adobe pdf library (v 9.1 )

    Hi All, I have an issue with processing composite fonts with adobe pdf library (v 9.1 ). While processing a pdf file having composite fonts, the pdf library is throwing an exception. The api which throwed exception is "PDPageAcquirePDEContent()". In

  • MB03 Vendor Batch is not appear

    Hi, I just perform MIGO 101 of Purchase order. I enter vendor batch number ABC123. After save, I go to MB03, I cannot find my Vendor batch number that I have entered just now. Please suggest me where should I configure to display the vendor batch in

  • Encore:  vobulator BlockPlanner error 217

    Hello, I've been building a project in Encore for days and finally went to build a DVD today, and after all the transcoding, when it went to write on the disc, it failed with the following message: internal software error: .\vobulator\BlockPlanner\Bl

  • Can't login to macbook

    My gf is using a white macbook 13'' early 2008 with the following specs: 2.4ghz intel core 2 duo 4gb ddr2 ram (667mhz) WD 500GB 5400rpm Mac OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard switched on her macbook and then typed in her password (no caps and caps are not swit

  • Latest Intel Graphic Driver For G450

    I'm using Windows 7 32 bit, What is the latest graphic driver possible for Intel Graphic Onboard ? Can I use the Latest driver from www.intel.com? If I can which one is more stable ?(from intel or lenovo) Sorry for my english, I'm Thai Thank you,