Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

    Hi Experts,
    We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
    Eg
    Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
    His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
    His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
    For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
    Please provide with your valuable inputs.
    Thanks in Advance
    Koutilya

    Hi,
    Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
    Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
    Annual Regular income is computed as under:
    Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
    Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
    VK

  • Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
    When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
    I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Pawan Sarda

    Hello
    Thanks for ur Reply.
    MIRO --  Subsequent Debit -
    >Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
    >PO NO. -
    > change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
    > Amount 4000 INR  -
    > also change Tax  Code of Line Item   -
    >Simulate
    Vendor A\c -
    >   4,348.18 INR Cr
    Stock A\c  -
    >  4,000.00 INR Dr
    Service Tax -
    >     338.04 INR Dr
    ECS             -
    >         6.76  INR Dr
    HECS          -
    >       3.38  INR Dr
    Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
    Actual Entry
    Vendor A\c -
    >  4,412.00 INR Cr
    Stock A\c  -
    > 4,000.00 INR Dr
    Service Tax -
    >    400.00 INR Dr
    ECS             -
    >        8.00  INR Dr
    HECS          -
    >      4.00  INR Dr
    Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

  • F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

    Dear Gurus,
    For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
    But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
    My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
    Regards
    Prabin

    You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ?  Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ?  This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run.  Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ?  With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

  • Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

    Hi
    We are in ECC 6.  In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60.  It works perfectly without any problem.  It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
    We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all.  All settings are as similar as development system.  Vendor master record also similar as development.  The document entered for testing is same as development.
    Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system?  Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
    You suggestion is most impartant.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Dear Venkatasubramanya,
    Check the following Master data in your Test System......
    1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
    2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
    check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
    Best Regards

  • Tax not Calculated on Activity created through Service master

    Hi;
    For different TAX values on Multiple line items in P.O, i am using Service Master to Create an Activity, and call that activity in my Service entry sheet.
    Now When Service entry sheet (P.R) is adopted in P.O it doesn't calculate tax.
    Any valuable information on this would be highly appreciated.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    In the purchase order the taxes are calcuated at item level. In the              
    service entry sheet the taxes are calculated at service level.
    The non-deductible input taxes both in the purchase order and on the             
    service entry sheet serve for the commitments structure and for                  
    information.                                                                     
    The tax actually paid with the invoice is later more precisely                   
    redetermined by the invoice verification in the system.                                                                               
    You can set the Customizing alternatively that the          
    taxes are calculated at service level instead of at item level. This             
    setting is particularly useful if different services of an item are to           
    be taxed differently as it is the rule in countries with                         
    jurisdiction-dependent taxes.  Please check your settings in transaction ML100.
    In this connection, refer to Notes 498878, 495316 and 371595.    
    Regards,
    Edit

  • TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
    We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
    Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
    The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
    What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
    I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
    Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
    How to achive this, pl help.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    hi
    the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
    now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
    can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
    also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    here what value u have maintained  ,we are using 2 as (2     Different G/L line)
    regards
    kunal
    Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

  • Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

    Hi Experts ,
    We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
    1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
    2)  Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
    Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
    Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
    But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
    Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
    I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
    Pls guide.
    Regards
    Honey

    Hi Ramesh ,
    i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
    In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

  • MIRO:Taxes not calculating

    Hi Gurus,
    I am using TAXINN
    Noe PO is done with all cond records
    GR is also fine
    J1IEX is also captured & posted
    But while posting MIRO,when I click on 'Calculate Tax'    the taxes are not calculating,
    Plz suggest
    Rgds
    Vinay

    Hi,
    Go to OB40
    maintain Cenvat Clearing account in for all taxcodes.
    for E.g.
    maintain ECS for Edu Cess, BED and J16 for H Edu cess
    all enteries must be like
    During Excise Invoice Credit            
                                        Cenvat Account           Dr.
                                        Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
                During Invoice Verification
                                        Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
                                        GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
                                        Vendor Payable                      Cr.
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • Tax not calculating for parked invoices

    Hi
    We are using external tax system to determine taxes in SAP.  When an invoice in MIRO is posted normally, the external tax system is called and tax is getting updated.  Whereas, when the invoice is parked for future posting, tax is not being calculated.
    Please help.

    Hi Nikitha
    I am able to park the document with tax.  The problem is when I return to the parked document, I cannot see the tax in the field i.e., it shows 0.00 and therefore the system does not allow me to post the document.

  • Taxes not calculation in PO

    Hi,
    We have scenario like this
    Currently we are using 4 tax codes with different combination like V1- Excise + L-VAT 4%, V2- Nil Excise+4% L-VAT, V3 u2013 Excise + C-VAT 12.5% & V4 u2013 Nil Excise+ C-VAT 12.5% Here 4% VAT is local VAT within state & C u2013VAT other state.
    We are using TAXINN procedure I know in this procedure values are not depending on tax code what we maintain in PO. But it will fetch taxes from condition what we maintain in FV11.My actual issue  popping here is when we had created another tax code and maintaining the condition in FV11 with key combination of Material/Plant/Vendor it is not populating in PO when if click tax tab, but when if I change tax code it is showing value with this calculation it is ok and entire cycle is completed successfully but my concern here, it is triggering same GL but we want it to hit different GL as per configuration in OB40 with relevant  account key and combination of tax code and GL  which is the reason we had created separate tax code. What would be reason?
    Regards

    HI,
    Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
    Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
    If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

    Hi,
    We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
    Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
    Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

  • Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

    Hi,
    Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
    But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO  WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
    Checks done :
    1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
    2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
    3.Base amounts checked.
    4. Formula for WHT checked
    5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
    Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
    Thanks in advance

    Shankar,
    Thanks for reply.
    If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
    I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
    I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E  SP 22   to 4.7 E  SP30.
    My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
    If any suitable answer appreciatable.
    Thanks once again for your reply.

  • Withholding Taxes not calculating

    Hi All,
    Currently we are using ECC 6.0.
    While creating Vendor we are assigning With Holding Tax codes and I created a BP with this Vendor.
    Now I created a Lease-In Contract for this BP, but system asking tax types and tax group is mandetory under Posting Parameters tab, but those tax types are belongs to Sales and Purchase tax codes.
    So I am unable to do with holding tax calculations and I tried Field status for for Tax types and tax group I did't find.
    Please advice me how I can achive this and is there any configuration settings to do with holding tax.
    Regards,
    CM.

    Hi,
    While assigning withholding tax code in vendor master for payment postings we should only update the withholding tax type. We must not update the withholding tax code. The reason being system always automatically calculate taxes even in the case of final payment.
    You can use report RFWT0010 to adjust the withholding tax information to the relevant withholding tax types. Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Neel

  • Tax not calculating

    In FV11 we are maintaining vat tax rate at plant/vendor/material level. we are not maintaining tax classification. In fi  FB60 entry  we are put plant & material  on line item level.  earlier  it was calculating  tax  respective  vendor, plant & material.
    But now tax calculation not happing in FB60 how can i resolved this issue? where i have do the changes?

    HI
    Check for the following Points:
    1] Tax code should have proper condition records with proper validity periods.
    2] Taxcode should be assigned to Compnay code
    3] If assignment of taxcode made relevence for MM/FI activities in -OBZT Tcode[actually this is not required while using TAXINN But some tax code maintained then you need to maintainn new taxcode created.]
    4]All the conditions with proper validity periods.
    If all these points are taken care then you can get the results.
    with regards
    Shriniavs gangoor

Maybe you are looking for