Tax Value not flowing to NET Value
Dear Guru's
I am facing a problem in TAXINN, Tax amount is visible and updating at item level but at header level value is not getting added up. For example
Base price = 100
BEDECessShecess = 14.42
LST Or Vat = 14.40 on 114.42
net value in item level showing 114.42 and tax 14.40, but when i go back and see the header level Net value it is showing 114.42 instead of 128.82.
All the setting are checked through a search in SDN and done the corrections still not coming.
Regards,
Sudhir
Dear GSL,
But still the Net value in the sales order initial screen has to show the total otherwise the Enduser or the Key user may get confused. As a consultant we can tell that both the values go to different table so the value will display only the total value minus tax amount. Is that so.
Kindly suggest me how to go about the same
regards,
Sudhir
Similar Messages
-
Net amount and taxes are not reflected in net value and taxes tab in sale
hi
While i am generating sale order that time system calculated all condition like price E.D cess E-cess Lst but it is not reflected in net value and tax tab.The value comes in net is quantity value.
Pl Give me Solution on that...
Thanks & Regards
sachinin header item level when i am putting my condition that time system calculate each and every condition but not reflected in tab net value tab. Insist of net value only quantity is coming in that tab......
Thanks
sachin -
Freight value not taking in net value--Urgent
Hi,
While creating purchase order freight condition valude FRB1 not taking in net value.
Please help its is urgent.
Regards,
RavindraHi Ravindra
You need post seperate invoices in case where the vendors are different, If the supply vendor and freight provider are same, you can post both costs in once invoice. Select the goods+delivery costs to make one invoice verification.
In general, freight value will not be added even the vendor is same. Inturn both item cost and delivery cost are processed in one invoice.
If you want, you can include the freght in net by maintaining the freight condition as not an accrual.
But, just for this sake, you should not modify your pricing procedure.
warm regards
sairam akundi -
Excise Values Not Flowing in J1IIN-(export Excise Invoice)
Hai ALL,
I have gone through the previous threads,
with those replies, my purpose hasnt solved.
req: -
" I am creating Export Excise invoice - J1IIN ( wrt : Export Invoice-VF01), Maintained "Subtransaction type- EX Exports"-
did the rel config: specify G/L accounts for ETT.
- Excise values flowing from VF01- J1IIN for domestic sales, but the same is not flowing into Export Excise Invoice-" -
my doubt is: Do the Excise Values flow to Export Excise Invoice from Comm.Invoice. ( As in Exp.Exc.Invoice, system will not generate any accounting entries).IN export sales,
I have maintained ED cond types as "Statistical" so that the values should not considered in Net value calculation. - which is working fine & Accounting documents for ED wont generate.
I have created Exp.Exc Invoice-J1IIN (with ref to- Comm.Invoice & Sub transaction type - EX_exports)- ED values in Comm Inv- flowing to Exp Exc Invoice. - In utilization tab- when change "Exc.Invoice type" - LoU, values become Zero- ( as MBS said, will take help of ABAPer to write the code "Suppress_calculation - "X"- )
But, can you confirm, that when we save Exp Exc Invoice- will accounting doc's generated or not-
( I expect, A/c'g docs will not generate- am i rite?)
after this, I have updated RG1-J1i5 (with Classification - IWE, RMA is done when GR from Production), Extract/print-RG1 - J2I5/J2I6.
Now create ARE-1 - J1IA101 ( wrt : Exp Exc Invoice) - mark the "Print ARE document"- Entered the "Bond" details in "BOND UT-1" tab. & save.
next, Post ARE-1 , Update ARE-1 & finally Close ARE-1.
"When we close ARE-1"?
is my understading above is rite??
pls suggest
Edited by: SAP Consultant- on Jan 28, 2009 4:31 PM -
Excise consdition value not flowing inot the invoice
Dear Gurus,
Excise condition value not flowing in to the invoice from sales order
Thanks
SasiDear lakshmipathi,
Iam entering the BED/Ed/ShEd values manually....
Where can I check the Tax code in the sales order?Does you mean to say the Tax classification at Item-Shipping tab?
Thanks
Sasi -
Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)
Dear Gurus,
Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
"Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
Regards,
Sam Ahmed
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your postHere is the pricing procedure,
We start with the amount condition types
Unit Price Units Condition Value
ZMRP MRP 1,700.00 10 PAC 55,080.00
ZTRP Trade Price 1,445.00 10 PAC 46,818.00
ZDPR Dist. Price 1,445.00 10 PAC 46,818.00 (GL)
Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
ZPRD Product Discount 23.000- % 10,768.14-
Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
ZDIS Discount Value 100.000- % 10,768.14- (GL)
tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS 36,049.86 as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
Order Item value 111.27 1 PAC 36,049.86
And the Net Price is 111.27 -
Invoicing Plan Net Value not equals to Ordered Value
Dear Xperts,
Need your advice.
Is it SAP standards, when an invoicing plan BPO is created with reference to an outline agreement the net value at the outline agreement (header statistic) is taken from the BPO net value (Quantity X Price) NOT BPO ordered value (Quantity X Price X Months).
Scenario Simulated:
(1) Contract Detail (value contract)
Target Value = RM12,000 (price RM1000 ; 12 months validity)
(2) Purchase Order
Quantity = 1 pcs ; Price = RM1000 ; Invoicing Plan = 12 months
Ordered Value = RM 12,000
Net Value = RM1000
As a result the utilization value (contract header statistic) is:
Target Value : RM12,000
Net Value : RM1000.
This will lead to a misleading info of utilization value of the contract.
Your experts explaination is highly appreciated.Anybody?
-
Excise value not flowing in MIGO
Dear All,
While doing MIGO, the Excise value for BED, ECESS is not flowing but the values are flowing in Purchse order. But the SECESS alone is flowing in both PO and MIGO.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
DhinakarHi raja,
h r u???
I have maintained all the settings, i thuink some note has to be applied. I will check it...
Thanks for ur Support
regards
Dhinakar -
Basic Price is not added in Net Value
Dear All,
In sales Order, Basic Price is not added in Net Value.
Thanks & Regards,
PMkindly let us know which condition type is used for basic price - and check the condition type whether the condition class is mentioned as "C".
and in plus/minus maintain positive
regards,
Sudhir -
Rounding Off is not rounding the net value in Debit/Credit Memo
Dear Experts,
Please guide me in the below mentioned situation:
I have used "Rounding Off" i.e. DIFF condition type in the pricing procedure and it is giving the desired result. But when I am creating Credit/Debit Memo, the Rounding Off is taking that value which it has taken to round the total value in creating billing document. As a result in many cases, while creating Credit/Debit Memo the Rounding Off is not rounding the net value of the document.
Please guide me how to solve this problem.
With regards,
Jhelum Roy.Thank you sir for this information. this is really helpful.
Further
My requirement is to capture this rounding value also and show it in the print and carry to GL account. So that client can generate a report on this extra revenue by rounding values.
I ahve only condition type in my rpicing procedure as per my requirement. details maintained are below
condition typr: ZPPC
Mandatory: X
print : X
requirement : 2(Item with pricing)
cal type: 17 (Rounding as perT001R)
Acc Key: ERL
in the table T001R table the calue maintained for Co.Code is+currency is 5(so that system is alsays round up 5)
tha t means if the value is 26.03 then it will become 26.05. This is working fine. but how to capture this 0.02 seperatly and carry to gl accouns
Thanks you in advance
Kiran Musuku -
Sales order should not copy the net value from contract
Hi,
When we are creating the sales order,Where we can maintain that sales order should not copy the net value from contract.
Regards
PrabudhHi,
When I am creating the sales order with reference to contract,it's copying the net value and quantity from the contract.
But I want that sales order should not copy the net value and quantity from the contract and user can take new required quantity at the time creating the sales order.
Regards
Prabudh -
Excise duty values not flowing from PO to MIGO
All SAP Gurus,
We have created a PO and used excisable tax code in it.
Excise duties are calculated correctly in PO.
When we go for Goods receipt against the PO, excise tab appears, but there are no values in excise fields (fiels are blank).
System allows us to enter the Excise duty values manually.
Further excise entries and register updates are happening correcetly.
We do not undersatnd why the Excise duty values are not flowing automatically from PO to GR (MIGO).
Please help.
Regards,hi
chekc following
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
here give appripriate conditions for ur procedure as per BED cess and other
regards
kunal -
Correct values not flowing in MIRO when values are changed in J1IEX
D/ Friends,
In Purchase Scenario with mov typ 101, when we capture excise duty thru T.Code J1IEX, sometimes we need to change the Duty Rates as well as Excise base Value (i.e.***. Value). We change these 2 things & we also change the BED, ECess & SH Cess values manually. Thereafter we do GRN & then post the EI.
Now the issue is that when we do MIRO, the duties Posted in EI in J1IEX, are not flowing in MIRO. Pls note that such scenario is occurring only when we change the above 2 things in J1IEX. Pls advice.
Rgds.pl check excise defalt for your tax procedure JCV1 condition assigned or not.
regards
karthik -
Changed JAOQ values not flowing from J1IEX to MIRO
Dear CIN experts,
We are having Dealers excise invoice capturing scenario in our implementation.
Here, we are capturing ADC for imported scrap at the time of posting J1IEX, which is not known at the time of punching PO. a nominal value has been maintained using JAOQ condition type.
While posting J1IEX, the actual excise values (BED, ECESS and SECESS) as in Traders excise invoice is captured including ADC.
All the values except AED (captured ADC) is flowing from J1IEX to MIRO, where as AED (JMOQ) is being picked up from Purchase order.
But this is not the case if JAOP is used to capture ADC in tax procedure. the changed AED value in J1IEX is flowing to MIRO.
Is this SAP standard behavior or is that SAP has not tested these scenarios?
kindly help to solve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Ashwin..Hi Shankar,
Thanks for the reply.
well, AED is almost non existent now. at least not in the scenario i have explained. this is about procurement of Metal Scrap. so the SAD that the import vendor has taken credit of is transferred to us through a dealer.
with JAOP, i can increase or decrease the value of AED mentioned in PO. but this is not happening with JAOQ (value condition).
With JAOQ, the value flows from PO, with JAOP, the value flows from J1IEX.
please let me know, if you require any more clarification on the above scenario.
Thanks again for the help
Ashwin. -
Excise Duty Value not flow from J1IJ to VF01
Hi SAP Expert,
I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ for pricing procedure JINDEP. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure JINDEP for Excise condition types JEXP. But it is still not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Do I need to go to VTFL In item level copying requirement to set pricing type: to C ??
But once i set, it will impact other billing document too. Please advise.
Thanks.Hi,
I have successfully posted Excise Invoice at Depot using J1iJ.
When i create billing via Vf01, i am unable to see the value of Excise Duty in item pricing condition from J1iJ.
I analyse the pricing condition for condition type JEXP, below is what i got :
This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
There are different reasons for this:
1.The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2. The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
1. When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
2. In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
Is it correct that i assigned routine 356 to Pricing Condition JINDEP ?
Maybe you are looking for
-
Upgraded to 10.4.9 - iSync no longer works with RAZR V3c (screenshots)
iSync has been working great with my RAZR V3c. I've been using it for my Address Book and iCal. Upgraded to 10.4.9 and now it doesn't recognize any devices to sync to, which is odd. I can still browse the phone using Bluetooth File Exchange. And as y
-
Selection tool not working and cannot select layers
Just loaded up cs5 w/ indesign and tried to start using indesign. To my dismay the selection tool and the layers will not high light when pointed to or work when clicked upon. these are the only tool i've found not to be working so far.
-
Datasource does not appear on the console, intermittent problem
I am using Weblogic 9.2 MP3 I've created an Oracle DataSource and successfully targeted it to a Managed Server. When I click on it in the console and navigate to the "Monitoring" tab, it would sometimes appear in the "Test DataSource" table and somet
-
I've had this MacBook Pro since late 2007 and the screen has now dimmed (with all settings on maximum brightness). It's not so dim that I can't see most text but most DVD or NetFlix movies are very hard to see. I've also noticed for a long time that
-
When i try to open aperture, i get a box popup that says; Warning-There was an error opening the database for the library "~/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary". Can anyone help? I cannot accesss aperture. this is the 1st time this has ever happene