Tcode BDLS and BDLSS problem with logical system names

Hello!
I have following problem.
During the SAP ECC 6.0 installation we have forgotten to give the clients the logical names.
Now, during the customizing it is necessary to have all the tables with logical names, so I have given for all the systems a logical name.
Now I have problem to convert all the tables that were customized without logical to such with one.
Is there some (semi)-automatical mechanism to do this or should I go to the SE16 and do it there?
Thank you very much indeed
regards
Thom

Hi,
You need to do it from SE16 or SM30
Regards
Sudheer

Similar Messages

Problem with logical system name

Hi All
We are facing problem when connecting Ecc 6.0 and BW
When i execute the RSA 1 transaction, i am getting the following error:
Logical system name has been changed for this system
I raised this issue to SAP.
I got the following reply:
Please see if the RSADMIN table has the correct logical system in BW.
If the logical system name here is incorrect, use report
sap_rsadmin_maintain to change the logical system name.
We reffered the Table RSADMIN, but couldnt identify which field has got logical system name.
Then we executed sap_rsadmin_maintain program in se38, but dont know what to enter in value and object field.
Can anyone help in this regard
Thanks in advance
Regards
Rak

Hi Lars,
I would start RSA1 in debugging mode. Try to establish which check is giving you this message by e.g. trying to set breakpoint at message.
Like this you can at least check which entry must be converted in order to be able to proceed.
Best regards,
Olav

Stuck with logical system name for JDBC Sender system!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi All,
I'm doing a scenario as JDBC2FILE.
I tried to add my jdbc sender system to SLD. So i created the technical system
now i'm creating business system...what should i give at logical system name tab? I've created tech system and business system as third party.
do we need logical system name in this scenario where we are not interacting with any R/3???
can anyone suggest the way to achieve this scenario?
Thanks in advance.....
Santhosh.

Hi Santhosh,
I just want to add ons..few more information which it might help you.
You no need to give logical system when you are using Thirdpaty.
Please check the below blog you will get more idea how to proceed to achieve the JDBC Scenario.
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30
If you have any doubts while proceeding with your scenario plesae let me know..I will try my level best.
Thanks and Regards,
Chandu

TCODE SARA and its variant in logical file name

Hi forum,
how can I create a logical file name (FILE tcode) with execution varian of SARA for archiving ?
Regards.
Ganimede Dignan.

Hello Ganimede,
Apart from the very good note suggested by Naveen please check this as well;
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8d/3e4ec2462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
You ca get more information from SAP help- data archiving section.
Regards.
Ruchit.
Message was edited by:
Ruchit Khushu

Problem with ECC6 system name

Hi,
Recently we upgraded our system from 4OB to ECC6. In new system when I try to change order through t.code KO02, It is giving message as 'Order Can not be changed in the current system SBX'.
Our new system name is SBX & we changed this name from CAD. Does this have any effect on this data.How to rectify this error.
Regards,
Karthik.k

Can anybody help me.

Logical System Name changing

Dear Team,
We had upgraded BI system from 3.0B to BI 7.0. At the time of upgrade dev
copy(shadow system) logical system was not changed because most of the data is coming from ETL. Now we want to test the extraction from R/3 Dev.
R/3 Dev is already connectwed to BW dev 3.0B, Now we need to test
extraction from R/3 Dev to BW dev copy server( NW2004SR1 ).
Here we are facing a problem with Logical system. While upgrading the
same logical sys was copied to BW dev copy.
What is the procedure to change the existing logical system name in BW
dev copy and establish connectivity with R/3 dev?
what is the impact if we run BDLS transaction.
Thanks& Regards,
Satish.K.Neni

Hi Satish,
Go to transaction SALE -> Basic settings -> Logical systems -> execute "Define logical system" to create a new logical system -> then execute "Assign Logical System to Client"
That should solve your problem
Regards
Juan
Please reward with points if helpful

Logical system name in SRM system

We are into SRM version 5.(SRM server 5.5) with the backend system as SAP ECC 6.0 .
The logical system is defined as '0000000050' for backend SAP system . All the systems like CRM and BW uses this as the logical system name for backend system . Recently SRM is implemented in our organization and we have no other choice and have to use the logical system name as '0000000050'
When product categories are assigned in the org attributes , the system stores the back end system as 50 and this is the issue. SAP support mentions that this is issue with logical system naming convention and that need to be fixed . But they fail to understand that the same name works fine in all other systems and also in SRM system except product categories .
Is there any OSS note for this fix. I would like to hear your experiences in this scenario.
Thanks
Mani

Hi Mani,
Logical System names are system specific, hence you have a different name in SRM system which will represent your backend system and this is not at all an issue. As suggested by SAP; '0000000050' is not the best name as per best practices.
You should have a name which should be of the pattern: <SID>CLNT<Client Number>.
Now here is the solution/work around. But be very careful and try this in sandbox system before being carried out in Dev/QA/PRD systems. Please make sure no other users are performing any activity while these tasks are being carried out.
In addition, please read through the ["Set up and system copy of SRM server 5.5";|https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000310782007E/SRM50_SetupTranspCopy.pdf] guide before you carry out this activity:
The below activities are to be carried out only in SRM system
I assume SRM & Backend are separate instances
1. Create a new logical system name for the backend system in SRM system as per the standard suggested above.
2. Then use the transaction BDLS, to convert the old logical system name to new logical system name in all the tables.
3. Now, the step 2 ensure the logical system name is converted appropriately in all tables except SRM Org Structure related table.
4. Use the report RHOMATTRIBUTES_REPLACE, for replacing all the old logical system value with new logical system value. Please note while providing the inputs in the screen, there will be a Checkbox field called "Sub-String", you must check this one for all attributes you enter in the report. Then when you execute the report, a list will be display, here you have to select all the rows and click the first button on the toolbar. Only then the attributes will be updated.
Please let me know, if further inputs are required.
Regards, Kathirvel

Reg Logical System Name

Hi,
We have ECC 6.0 PROD and ECC 6.0 QAS System.
WE have different logical system names for both the systems
But when we refreshed the PROD to QAS , we have to run the BDLS transcation to change the logical System name(since we are having different logical System name)
But BDLs is taking more than 40 hours.
Please let me know , whether logical system name can be the same throughtout the landscape or not
In other words , is there any side effects if i have same logical system name for QAS and PROD

I've been researching the same issue. I found the following
"Is it necessary to change the logical system names?
Because of the two reasons mentioned above (long runtime of transaction BDLS and possible inconsistencies), it may be desirable, to avoid the renaming of logical systems during system copy.
Whether logical systems names need to be changed at all after a system copy depends on the type of the target system: "
This is from SAP System Landscape Copy for SAP Net Weaver and my SAP Solutions
Best Practice for Solution Management
I found it searching for sap bdls alternative
Hope this helps. I'm continuing my search.

HT200169 Having a problem with Logic 9 on a Mac Pro.Working on a lenghty song and apparently session got corrupted.Doesnt let me export tracks,program crashes.Already tried start brand new session with the tracks imported into it but still wont export.Sug

Hello,having a problem with Logic 9 on a Mac Pro.Working on a lenghty song and apparently session got corrupted.Doesnt let me export tracks,program crashes.Already tried start brand new session with the tracks imported into it but still wont export.Suggestions?

Thanks, Ian. Yeah, that's how I do it now...or with the controls in the left side pane. Still, I would have liked that quick on-the-spot edit capability...especially while sketching.
Ian Turner wrote:
Sorry Mark, you are out of luck as it does not do that - it works the same as L8. The way I would achieve that with more accuracy and control would be to route all the tracks you want to fade to a Bus then use volume automation on the bus. To do this you will need to add a standard audio track, then re-assign it using (Control Click on the track header) to the Bus track. You can then automate volume/plugins etc on the Bus track.
Ian

140063685933 this is the receipt no Apart of two purchase there all rest I never received was a problem with the system they couldn't be download and naw you are charging me Haw unprofessional is that and more than an hour can't find how to get to custom

140063685933 this is the receipt no
Apart of two purchase there all rest I never received was a problem with the system they couldn't be download and naw you are charging me
Haw unprofessional is that and more than an hour can't find how to get to customer service to correct the mistake
Just so fed up will never ever pitches anything waiting of time and money

Apple is not here. Apple does not answer questions here. There are only volunteer users here.
The charge to your credit card takes place before you download the app.
If you are having problems downloading the apps that you bought, you will need to explain the issue in detail if you wish someone to help you.

BI 7.0, BDLS is not converting all logical systems for datasources

Hello all,
We have refreshed an ECC system, and during the post steps in BI, we were running into issues.
We've ran BDLS to convert the logical system from ECCCLNTXXX to ECCCLNTYYY, but it's was not converting for several datasources.
One in particular was causing several problems, and terminating the conversion.
0FC_CI_01. It is still hanging on to the old logical system. BDLS terminates with the following information:
Short text:
Active version of emulated 3.x DataSource 0FC_CI_01 cannot...
Basically, the exact symptom of Note 936644.
Eventually, through a series of trials, we discovered we could assign non-active sourcesystem/logical system combinations to the objects. As a result, we deleted the source systems entirely, ran BDLS to the ECCCLNTYYY, then recreated the sources.
This finally worked. What I need now is a root cause. Why would BI refuse to change the logical system of an object to an active one, but have no problem with an inactive?

Mike,
After running BDLS, you need to replicate the source system in BW, change the contents of the target host and fields for all R/3 and Data Mart(note 184754). Update the target BW system name in table T000 using SM30. Change logical system name in all BW tables using BDLS (note 325525)
Refer to the below doc for detail. Also refer to note 886102.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/805eefcd-5428-2d10-c0ab-dc27a95b2c81?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Below note talks about similar issue.
How to change all infosources to the new source system automatically
Hope this helps.

How to get RFC Destination and Logical System name dynamically

Hi all,
I have a RFC FM written in CRM. I need to call this FM in R/3. So, i use the syntax " Call function <func> destination <destination name>. My problem is that i need to fetch the destination name dynamically..
There is a way to do so in CRM which is as follows:
DATA: lt_siteselect TYPE TABLE OF siteselect INITIAL SIZE 0,
 ls_siteselect TYPE siteselect.
CALL FUNCTION 'SMOF0_READ_SITESELECT'
 TABLES
 to_siteselect = lt_siteselect.
READ TABLE lt_siteselect INTO ls_siteselect
 WITH KEY sitetypeid = cl_smw1_siteprovider=>c_sitetype_r3oltp.
The above piece of code returns the site and also takes care of the client you are currently working on. But the specified FM is present only in R/3..
I want to achieve the functionality fulfilled by the above code in R/3.
Kindly help.
Useful answers will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance,
Karan Merwana
I can not use FM LOG_SYSTEM_GET_RFC_DESTINATION as for that i need to provide the logical system name. And the logical system name would be different for different clients.
Message was edited by:
 Karan Merwana

For those referring this thread later, I could not find a solution to this and ultimately had to do away with hardcoding of system names based on the DEV, Q, and PROD system names.
If anyone does manage to get a workaround, please let me know.

System Copy and Logical system name conversion

Hello All,
Can any one let me know some inputs over these few queries.
1. How much time would a 500+GB clients take for Export and reimport after the system copy.
2. What would be run time of the BDLSS report ( Converting the logical system names) for a typical 1500 GB QTY system
The requirement is my QTY has 3 clients, and i would like to refresh it with my PRD data. How do i safely perform thia activity with the least downtine possible and please note, the clients are around 500+ GB huge..
Thanks in advance for your inputs.
Rgds,
Sri

Hi Frank,
the parameters of my installation are as folows.
Appl Serv : OS - AIX (5.2 Version) and CPU's - 4 (Mem 20480) ::: DB serv : OS - AIX(5.2 Version) and CPU - 6 (Mem 22528)
The DB version is Oracle 9.2
We are on 4.7 enterprise version of SAP with SAPKA62055 patrch level.
br
Sri

Problems with Logical Components

Hi All,
I am having problems with Logical Components with our project. We are implemeents SAP HCM and we have defined a logical component Z_ERP for the ECC server. now when you look at the transaction from SOLAR02 it seems they also have a logical Component SAP Learning Solution that is assigned to them. what could be the cause of this???

Hi Trevor,
If you brought them in from the Business Process Repository, the logical component is going to be the default one. If you want to use your own, you need to replace the default one with yours.
You can do this in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN by going to the System Landscape tab > Systems tab > highlight the SAP Learning Solution logical component row > press F4 > replace it with Z_ERP.
If for some reason SAP Learning Solution isn't listed as a logical component you may have to add it, you can also just go to SOLAR02 > Edit > Replace Log. Comp > Enter SAP Learning Solution in the top box and Z_ERP in the bottom one > click Save.
regards,
Jason

Use and impact of the logical system (SCC4)

An error has been made in our SAP system (production environment), transaction SCC4. The field «Logicial system» has been changed from «PRD460» to «QAS460». It has been left this way for few weeks and when we realized the mistake, we changed it back from «QAS460» to «PRD460».
For few hours, the document numbers in MM (t-code MIGO) were generated, but were not found in t-code MB03. We were able to generate them manually in t-code SM13 and the problem was solved.
What is the use of the «Logicial system» ? What could have been the impact on our database and on the integrity of our system of having the wrong logical system set to our production environment for few weeks ?
Thanks.

Hi,
Logical System Names
When data is distributed between different systems, each system within a network has to be clearly identifiable. The u201Clogical systemu201D deals with this issue.
A logical system is an application system in which the applications work together on a common data basis. In SAP terms, the logical system is a client.
Since the logical system name is used to identify a system uniquely within the network, two systems cannot have the same name if they are connected to each other as BW systems or as source systems, or if there are plans to connect them in any way.
Although SAP does not recommend that you connect test systems to production systems, a test system can have the same name as a production system. This makes copying production systems to test systems a lot simpler.
You are only allowed to change the logical system name of a system if the system is not connected to any other systems, because changing the logical system name would render all the connections to other systems useless.
Anil

Tcode BDLS and BDLSS problem with logical system names

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for