Tcp_wrappers compile options

I just had another look at tcp_wrappers' PKGBUILD after reading my post in http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=58685 in which I found out that at least vsftpd needs "STYLE=-DPROCESS_OPTIONS" when configuring tcp_wrappers for certain features. However, in Arch's default PKGBUILD, it's "STYLE=-DSYS_ERRLIST_DEFINED". But as far as I understand the Makefile, -DSYS_ERRLIST_REFINED is already enabled because of the keyword "linux" in "make REAL_DAEMON_DIR=/usr/sbin STYLE=-DSYS_ERRLIST_DEFINED linux", so it's not even needed. It would be nice if that could be changed if true.

I consider this a really cheesy and hopefully very temporary workaround. It may not be recommended, use at your own risk, your universe may collapse into a black hole, etc., etc. But it worked.
If you still have a 10.7 install on another volume, you can copy the old sshd binary and missing libwrap library file to your 10.8 boot disk and run it. Quick and dirty run down (this is not detailed for those not versed in command line):
Pre) Make sure you stop the default sshd daemon via the sharing control panel. (Uncheck "Remote login.) Otherwise you will have a conflict on port 22 when you try to start the old.
1) Mount the 10.7 volume. For my example I'll call mine "Mac 10.7 HD"
2) sudo cp /Volumes/"Mac 10.7 HD"/usr/lib/libwrap.7.dylib /usr/lib/.
3) sudo cp /Volumes/"Mac 10.7 HD"/usr/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/sshd2 (or "sshd-old" or whatever you like, just don't overwrite the exisitng sshd or you won't be able to revert later.)
4) sudo /usr/sbin/sshd2 (start the daemon)
Note you can't use the sharing control panel to control this version and if you wanted it start between reboots you would have to create a separate launchctl script for it.
Linc, another good lead, thanks. I probably should be spending my time looking around for alternatives than hacking away at my install.

Similar Messages

TS1468 Where is the compilation option in version 11?

I have a single album what was split into 5 sections because of variations on artist name. Past support articles suggested using the Compilation option when selecting the multiple split portions. Where is that option in version 11 of iTunes? I do no see this feature.

Compilation can be found in the Get Info dialog. Generally all you need to do to link things is fill in an appropriate Album Artist. For more details see my article on Grouping Tracks Into Albums, in particular the topic One album, too many covers.
tt2

Passing extra compiler options to flexunit ANT task?

Hi,
Is there a way to send any extra compiler options to the <flexunit> ANT task?
I'm using conditional compilation and compilation (mxmlc) is failing from the <flexunit> task:
"Error: Access of undefined property DEBUG.
CONFIG::DEBUG {"
I tried sneaking "-define+=CONFIG::DEBUG,false" in with one of the other compiler options you can set on the <flexunit> task, but that just doesn't work or results in a validation error like this:
"One of the directories specified as a 'testSource' element does not exist."
Let me know if this is possible at all.
Thanks,
Wijnand

Hi Brian,
legrosb wrote:
@Wijnand - Sorry for the belated response.
Not late at all! I think a response within a day on a forum is quite fast!
legrosb wrote:
I thought I had captured this on the wiki, but it looks like I haven't, so thank you for the heads up.
I'll also update the wiki @ http://docs.flexunit.org/index.php?title=Ant_Task to be more detailed regarding compilation so other don't have to dig.
Did you just do an update on that Wiki page or did I completely miss the part that explained the <flexunit> parameters?
legrosb wrote:
In 4.2, which is super pre-alpha right now, I've added support to accept a series of flex-config.xml files provided by the user. Not sure if conditional compilation can be tackled with a custom flex-config.xml file, but if so then that'd be the feature that may help you.
Yes, being able to add (+=) a custom config file will solve this problem for me. You can define properties and values like this:
<flex-config>
    <compiler>
        <define>
            <name>CONFIG::DEBUG</name>
            <value>false</value>
        </define>
    </compiler>
<flex-config>
So in your AS code you can use:
CONFIG::DEBUG {
    // Do something that only should be done in debug mode.
I have another question, I ran into this one during testing my SWF with flexunit.
unittest.xml:82: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: command [<testcase classname='com.tuenti.video.unittest.testcase.player::MockPlayerCase' name='loadPlayer' time='0.000' status='success'/>] not understood
I had a look at the FlexUnitSocketThread.parseInboundMessages method that throws this error and it looks like that your defined END_OF_SUCCESS doesn't entirely match what the SWF is spitting out. They are of by 1 space: END_OF_SUCCESS is defined as: "status=\"success\" />", whereas my SWF spits out the following: "status='success'/>" (single quotes and no space before the closing of the tag).
It looks like I'm not the only one with the ExecutionException as it is reported on StackOverflow as well: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3953677/flexunittasks-error-of-command-not-understood
Cheers,
Wijnand

How to specify java compiler options in JDeveloper ?

I am using JDeveloper 10.1.2. I downloaded and installed JDK 5.0.
In my "Project Properties"->"Libraries" I created a new "JDK 5.0" J2SE Version and pointed to the new JDK5.0 execuitable. So far so good.
Now I need to compile all my source code with -source=1.4 option. How do I specify java compiler option "-source=1.4" in JDeveloper ?
Thanks
Sachin

Even before compilig I am not sure that by just going to "Project Properties"->Libraries and creating a new J2SE, I now have the new compiler working with JDEveloper. How do I test this ?

Flex 4 lacks the default-background-color compiler option?

Hello,
started converting my Flex 3 applications to Flex 4 and noticed that Flex 4 lacks the default-background-color compiler option.
Flex 3 has it: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=compilers_14.html
Flex 4 doesn't: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf69084-7a92.html
This raises a question: how am I supposed to keep my background from flashing from grey to white when the RIA is loaded? Is it possible to use preloader with background set to whatever color I like to see? Any easier solutions?
Best regards,
Jukka

This works for me:
@namespace mx "library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx";
mx|Application{
background-color:#ffffff;
Of course if you have changed the Application element to spark equivalent, you have to change the namespace.
Regards,
Jukka

Compile option is missing in the Packaging wizard

I need to compile my local app jsp files but the problem is i could not able to find the compile option in the Packaging wizard. Can anyone advice how to compile ? The compile option is missing in the packing wizard. I was using it before without any issues but recently i upgraded my machine and need to compile once again.
I am using oracle 10g lite and my machine is 64 bit.

Ubuntu 11.xx displays window menus in the control bar at the top of the screen with the switch to the Unity window manager.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Unity
Click on Bookmarks/Show All Bookmarks then move your mouse to the left upper corner toward Firefox Web Browser.
You'll get pop up menu (Organize, Views and Import and Backup).
*[[/questions/822193]]

PL/SQL compile options

Is there any way to give the PL/SQL compile options while compiling from SQL*PLUS like we give in Pro*c Compilers using EXEC ORACLE OPTIONS (name=value);
Thanks

Richard,
I tried the following simple PL/SQL
created the package
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE partest AS -- package spec
PROCEDURE insert_dummy_details(num INTEGER);
END partest;
Created the body
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY partest AS -- package body
PROCEDURE insert_dummy_details(num INTEGER) IS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO pardummy values(num);
END insert_dummy_details;
END partest;
created pardummy table
compiled & executed it
count in v$open_cursor increased by 1.
Also, i executed the query which you mentioned.
It showed the corresponding insertion sql text with the status CURBOUND
Does it mean that a cursor is open in session which can be counted against open_cursor for that insert statement.
Partha

Updated "Selecting the Best Compiler Options" now available

The technical article "Selecting the Best Compiler Options" by Darryl Gove has been updated for Sun Studio 12 Update 1 and is now available at:
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/documentation/techart/compiler_flags/
Here's the abstract:
+This article suggests how to get the best performance from an
UltraSPARC or x86/EMT64 (x64) processor running on the latest Solaris
platforms by compiling with the best set of compiler options and the
latest compilers. These are suggestions of things you should try, but
before you release the final version of your program, you should
understand exactly what you have asked the compiler to do.+

Ok sorry I've taken so long to respond. The reply button wouldn't pop up for me to reply!
There was never a dialog box asking for me to select the program from installed programs when I open the pdf from outlook express. But when I opened a pdf from my desktop it asked that question and I had it "always use this program to open this type of file." So I assumed that it was would work when opening from outlook express. But it doesn't.
I've tried unclicking the protected mode button under the preferences general section. And finally I'm not sure how to post screenshots of the attachment thumbnail and dialog. I'm looking all over my keyboard for a button to push I don't have a clue as to what to do! I do have a print Scr button but when I click on it nothing happens. I've tried holding down the shift key and the button and the alt key and print scr button but nothing happens.
Could it be that somehow it's not recognizing ARCO.EXCH.DOCUMENT as that's what it thinks the type of document is?
I've already created an association for pdf files and it'll open them on my desktop, just not in outlook express.

JDev 9.0.3 - problem with compiler options to copy resource file types

Hello,
Following a quite strange scenario, I found something bizarre related to the project compile options in 9.0.3 production (I assume the same problem was present way before...)
Let me first present the facts:
Assume I have in my project one file named noext (with no extension!) and another one file.verylongext. I know it's not best practice, but let's say they are third party files and I would prefer not to touch them.
I am able to add them to the project sources, in the specified packages, then I update the Project Settings/Compiler/Resource File Types to Copy to Output Directory.
But, when I compile, I realize that not all my files were copied to classes/. In fact, if I specify ...;noext;file.verylongext, I get only noext copied, while if I specify ...;file.verylongext;noext, I only get file.verylongext.
I also tried to use only .verylongext, but the result was exactly the same...
Of course I can copy the files manually, outside JDev, but this is not best practice neither... :)
As long as JDev 9.0.3 seems to provide support for filtering the files that will be added to a project (see thread Re: update column for details), I don't really see the purpose of filtering again the files that will be transferred to classes/ (apart from the little bug).
I think it would be far more useful to have the reverse filter, i.e. "Resource File Types not to Copy to Output Directory". JDev team, would it be possible to have this in 9.0.4?
Thanks,
Adrian

>I tried to reproduce the problem and couldn't.
Nevermind, I will be back on this when I'll have a simple example.
>One question, is noext and file.verylongext part of your project?
Well, you know, since I said I have them in my project, it means that I added them there and I checked that they really were added. No offense...
>One more question, did you enable Scan Source Path to ... in the input paths panel of the pproject properties?
No, I did not enable this option, since I see all my files in the project and the only source path is project's src.
But my real point is related to the enhancement request I made. Given the circumstances,
could you provide the reverse filter, i.e. "Resource File Types not to Copy to Output Directory", in a future version, maybe 9.0.4?
Thanks,
Adrian

Image format compilation options

The Pixel Bender spec (included with the toolkit) states:
"Depending on compilation options, pixel channels may
actually be 8-bit integers, 16-bit integers, or 32-bit
floating-point values."
However, I couldn't find any discussion on how to set such
compilation options. Is this currently possible? I'm interested in
creating a 32-bit floating point output image.

Hi Joe,
That bit of the spec. is misleading and should be changed in
the next version. Assuming you're writing a Pixel Bender kernel for
Flash your image data will always be 32 bit floating point.

Javac compiler options

Could anyone explain the difference between these two javac compile options:
-source <release> Provide source compatibility with specified release
-target <release> Generate class files for specific VM version
Say, I want to make sure my bytecode runs on Java 2 version 1.4 or above, which option should I choose?

Could anyone explain the difference between these two
javac compile options:
-source <release> Provide source compatibility with specified releaseTurns on specific compiler cabilities.
-target <release> Generate class files for specific VM versionGenerates class files that are compatible with specific versions (the class file
format has changed somewhat with versions.)
>
Say, I want to make sure my bytecode runs on Java 2
version 1.4 or above, which option should I choose?Well unless you are using 1.5 then you do not use either of the above options.

-keep-generated-actionscript Compiler Option Question

I'm trying to learn how Actionscript works. I turned on the -keep-generated-actionscript compiler option so that I could see the generated actionscript for an ItemRenderer I'm creating.
Should I:
1. directly edit the generated file, or
2. use the generated file as a reference for creation of my own ItemRenderer class file.
I'm thinking the latter, right?
all feedback appreciated!
many thanks,
Mark

You can do either, but there are AS item renderers in the SDK that are
better reference implementations.

Java compiler options with JSP

          Is there any way to specify compiler options to use with the JSP compiler through weblogic.properties? I'd like to get the JSPs compiled with the -g option. Thanks.
          Mike


          How about add
          J=-g
          to "weblogic.httpd.initArgs.*.jsp"?
          Jong
          "Michael Gilbode" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >Is there any way to specify compiler options to use with the JSP compiler through weblogic.properties? I'd like to get the JSPs compiled with the -g option. Thanks.
          >
          >Mike

Compiler options to include cert with debug AIR

Hi,
I asked this in the media server forum also, but it occurred to me it may be more specific to here: I'm building an AIR app against protected streams with the app recognised by the cert I use to compile.
This works great, but for debug, the certs aren't included, so I can't see the streams in debug mode.
Does anyone know any compiler options I can use to force the debugger compile to be authenticated in the same way?
Thanks,
G

I'm having trouble understanding what change in Sun compilers or in Solaris could have resulted in the change in behavior you report.
For template code, Sun compilers have always used the automatic inclusion model described in the C++ Users Guide section 5.2, "Template Definitions".
Specifically, if you include a header foo.h that declares one or more templates, the compiler will automatically include foo.cpp (or foo.cc, foo.C, etc) if it needs a definition of one of those templates. That is, it assumes that template definitions missing from foo.h will be in foo.cpp.
Does that answer your question?

Passing compile options in PKGBUILD honoured or overriden?

Hey there.
First post. New Arch user here, saying: hello! Been using Linux for years. Recently switched from a .DEB-based distro. Love the rolling release model and pacman and ABS (first time exposure to the latter - I don't even have it in my car!). Thanks for all the good stuff.
I figured a good way to start using Arch would be to contribute to the Wiki and to build a package or two.
In the PKGBUILD I submitted, I have:
make GCCOPTS="-DKERNEL2_1 -D_GNU_SOURCE -O3 -Wall" tleds || return 1
I included options like -O3 and -Wall verbatim from the Makefile of the original tarball. Do these get overridden by CFLAGS from /etc/makepkg.conf? (I pretty much left it untouched)
Is -D_GNU_SOURCE even necessary? (it seems to compile without it as well)
* Edit: changed subject.
Last edited by MajorTom (2008-10-10 15:10:24)

tomk wrote:If these options are already in the Makefile, you don't have to pass them explicitly to make. After all, make reads the Makefile.
In this particular case, the default Makefile needs to be modified or else the app won't work with kernels 2.1.x and up. This is taken care of by the $GCCOPTS variable (defined by the app author in the Makefile) which will pass the "-DKERNEL2_1" compile option to 'make'.
What I'm unsure of is: the Makefile also specifies "-O3" while /etc/makepkg.conf defines "-O2". Which one wins? Should the PKGBUILD not include that option and in that case would 'make' use "-O2" from the makepkg.conf?
Moreover, the Makefile includes "-Wall". Can/should this be omited? Does it really matter?
Asking questions is the only way to learn. Thanks guys!

Tcp_wrappers compile options

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for