TCURX entry in BW for JPY

Hi BW experts!
We are currently implementing a BW solution for Japan and hence the currency used in all transactions is JPY.
I undertand JPY has no decimals and hence finds an entry in TCURX table with 0 decimal places in BW .
Our R3 team has now removed this entry from TCURX table as it seems they want to have 2 decimal places for reporting.
Now,in order to replicate this,in RSA1 for my ECC system I did transfer of global settings->Update tables.This did not help.
I even tried rebuild option.But even this did not take off the JPY entry in TCURX in BW.
Is this behaviuor normal? Should it not have repopulated the TCURX table by deleting YEN entry?
Or should we manually delete the entry in BW in TCURX by going to SPRO?
Please suggest .We are in the development system currently.
Thanks in Advance.
Sree

Hi there,
Go to RSA1->Source Systems and right-click over your R/3 system and choose "Transfer Exchange Rates" and choose "Transfer exchange rates again".
Diogo.

Similar Messages

Decimal places for JPY currency in change documents

Hi Gurus,
For opportunities in SAP GUI the change documents for JPY show incorrect numbers.
The number is divided by 100 (two decimal places added).
Checked the CDPOS table and found the values already divided (two decimal places added).
SPRO->General Settings->Currencies->Set decimal places for currencies is set for 0 decimals for JPY.
Is there any way I can get correct values in the change documents?
Please advice. Any hint is useful.
Thx,
Martin Kuma

Hi Naren,
Thank you for the tip, however the TCURX table is changed via customizing and should be changed only during the system initialization.
What I would like to do, is to assure that the system displays the values in change documents correctly. It should apply the currency conversion for the data displayed the same way it does for all the tables.
Do you have any idea, how should I do this?
Regards,
Martin Kuma

PO Net price for JPY

Hi,
    I have a situation in PO netprice for currency JPY. Fro example, the net price on the PO (ME23N) shows as 131,325,000, but at the table level (Both EKPO and conditions) it shows like 1,313,250.00 . The last two digits are taken as decimals, but they are not decimals. The correct value is displayed correctly in ME23N, but the value stored in DB is wrong.
My question is , is it possible to store the right value in DB or each time do I have to multiply by 100 to get the correct value for JPY? Thanks,
Regards,
Sundar.

Hi Sundar,
Transaction SE16 is a technical view to databases/tables and is designed and created for programmers but not for normal users.
You didn't encounter an error, this is just the way the R/3 works with its data internally. If your issue is about a report, You have to adjust your reports according to the way R/3 handles currency amounts.Let's me explain, the value of data stored in EKPO depends on the decimal places defined for the currency. Standard is taken as 2.
Therefore the value will be the same as order price only if the currency is defined for two decimal places (default is 2).
Currencies which do not have two decimal places must be defined in table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes). You can check tableTCURX for JPY - CURRDEC = 0. Zero decimal places are defined for currency JPY.
So, if you want to use EKPO-NETPR for your own applications, you must also consider table TCURX. All currencies that do not have any decimal places at all (TCURX-CURRDEC = 0) must have EKPO-NETPR multiplied by 100.
Hope this explain your issue !!!
Regards,
Mauro

Entry Channel setup for multiple company codes

Hello,
I have a question regarding the entry channel setup (for external requirements in the Plan-Driven Procurement scenario)
In previous implementations, I 've created an entry channel below each company code (as the documentation says it should be). Now, for each entry channel, there was a EBP user assigned, which corresponded to an RFC entry in the backend system (I was connecting EBP to multiple backend systems)
Now, what should I do in the following scenario?:
1. SRM is only connected to one backend system
2. There are 50 company codes
Does that mean I have to create 50 users (for each channel) plus 50 RFC connections in the R/3 system (each with a different user in the backend system), pointing to the same SRM system?
I was thinking of creating an Org iD in the SRM structure at the top (which would be the entry channel), assign only ONE user to it and then fill attribute BUK with all the company codes. However, I don't know if this will work, because the external requirement process might need the company code defined in the "Function" tab... =/
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Gilberto.

Hi Proyecto Genesis,
I am also configuring the Entry channel (org unit) for multiple company codes.
I tried your logic of defining the entry channel outside company code level. Assigned the BUK attribute and extended attribute for plants and storage locations.
Also in my case the local Pur org and Pur group is defined outside the company code. Is it correct?
However the system fails to transfer the external requisition to SRM.
SLG1 displays following error message.
"No address found for partner function type Ship-To Address"
So if I move the Entry channel (org unit) under any one company code level then the external requisitions are transferred correctly to SRM.
But then the issue is the requirements are not transferred with the backend Pur Org and Pur grp. Instead they are transferred to the Pur Org and Pur grp of the company code under which the entry channel is defined.
Can you please share how do we need to define the entry channel, local pur org and pur grp for multiple company codes scenario, so that the ECC requisitions are transferred with the correct company code, pur org and pur grp to SRM?
Or do we need to define Entry channel for each company code and RFC user actually mapping the same backend system?
Please guide.
Regards,
Sandeep

Locate an entry in SXMB_MONI for a particular value(IDoc numbe) in payload

Hi,
We have an R/3 XI Third party scenario. R/3 is sending tones of IDocs. In some cases some IDcos are not going beyond XI. In BD64 we get a status code 40(from XI).
We would like to locate the entry in SXMB_MONI for one particular IDoc. The only way now is to manually open all entries for the service/interface combination and see the IDoc number which is becoming very painful.
Since we are in testing phase, there are a lot of entries for the sender/receiver interface combination. We tried to narrow down the result in SXMB_MONI with all possible search criteria like service, interface, etc. Time is ruled out because, we have queues with a lot of messages and never know when a particular message is processed by XI (so the time of sending from R/3 may not make sense in SXMB_MONI as a search criteria).
So my question is: it there a way to find an entry in SXMB_MONI for a particular IDoc number (which is present in the payload) ?
As a programmer, I could think about a program which does this ?! But dont know in which tables the entries are saved or the relation between the tables ?!
Can someone please throw some light on it ?
Thanks in advance
Cheers
danus
null

There is a way actually.
Idoc Tracking is available from Sp18 ( I think ).
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c1/bab13bb3acd607e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Look into Idoc Tracking in this link.
Regards
Bhavesh

Exception :java.sql.SQLException: Duplicate entry '1-0' for key 1

Help me in fixing this error
Exception :java.sql.SQLException: Duplicate entry '1-0' for key 1
1>>User_ID is primary key and unique and
2>>User_ID is also auto Incremented
3>>User_ID is the First coloumn in the table
PreparedStatement ps=con.prepareStatement("insert into User(user_name,user_email,user_password) values (?,?,?)");
ps.setString(1,s11);
ps.setString(2,s22);
ps.setString(3,s33);
int i= ps.executeUpdate();

A growing trend it appears. Must be some new high school and/or college curriculum regarding moral relativism.

"Missing signed entry in resource" for only some users

Hi,
I have recently updated my .jnlp file and .jar file and added some extra jar resources in the new jnlp.
Since this new version, some users receive an error saying
"Missing signed entry in resource:" for one particular resource.
While for other users it works fine.
I have signed the jar with jarsigner.
Does anyone have an idea what could be the problem here?
Thanks very much in advance,
Best regards,
Stein Aerts,
University of Leuven, Belgium

I remember hearing something like this, and had to do with :
1.) what version of jarsigner was used to sign the jar, and
2.) what version of JRE was used to validate the signed jar file on the client.
(including US only vs. International version of JRE)
For the jar that gets this error:
Does it have any empty directories in it., or does it have entries with non-english characters in the resource names ?
What version of the JDK was used to run jarsigner to sign this jar, and what jre is the application running on ?

No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T555A 110600

Hello Experts,
When I run the time evaluation through T-Code PT60, I am getting the following error:
No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T555A 110600 01.01.2009
Technical error no. 72
01.01.2009 Processing terminated for EE 90000022.
Kindly let me know how to resolve this?
Thanks & Regards,
Preshit.

Hello
This error usually occurs as the program is looking for an entry in table T555A for PSg 'XX' and time type 'XXXX' and does not see an entry.Consequently, an error is produced.
PSg 'XX' (MOBDE) is due to your configuration for this employee, as found in T001P using personnel area and subarea. Please make sure you have the entries it is looking for defined.
Would you also please check all infotypes of this personnel number regarding their validity, especially quotas. In similar cases this error message occurred, if the IT0007 started before hire date of the employee.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Ramana

No entry in table $ for key $ 554C 400100 20090

Hi Gurus,
While running payroll--for some employees(pre . number 125) the following error is coming:
No entry in table $ for key $ 554C 400100 20090
Technical error no. 72
02.01.2009 Processing terminated for EE 00000125
This error is coming while I am applying Leave Without Pay (LWP).
If I delete the applied "Leave Without Pay " there is no error with the payroll run . It's working fine .
I want to see the effect what happened if I apply LWP whether Basic Pay is reducing or not .
Please help.
Thanks
Pramod S

No entry in table $ for key $ 554C 400100 20090
Check the Groupings for this employee in V_503_ALL
u have not assigned the Valuation rule
no if u are not applying to LWP the Basic pay will not get Reduced
Assign ur Absece Valuation to ur Absence type
Groupng problme kindly check
Edited by: Sikindar on Jun 17, 2009 1:02 PM

No Entry in table for Key at T511K 40 GTMAX

Hi,
Iam doing Time evaluation with clock times...
While running RPTIME00 I am getting this error
" No Entry in table for key at t511k 40GT MAX "
What to do?kindly help
hr_user

Hi,
I guess you are configuring for Indian Payroll.The error says that in the table T511K,and for country grouping 40,the constant is GTMAX is missing.Please check the rule where the Timeevaluation is giving the error and look for the operation and this constant GTMAX find out for what the rule is looking for and based on that ,you need to create that constant.
I guess this is not GTMAX,but that is TGMAX which is for daily maximum hours and which will be checked by the rule TO21 in the schema TM00.
So what you need to do to solve this problem is.
1.Go to the table V_T511K with Tcode SM30.
2.Type in the country grouping 40
3.Then Create a constant TGMAX with the number hour maximum hour allowed in you company .
Hope it solves your problem.
Good Luck!

No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T555A 000900 01/01/2010

Hi All
While running time evaluation, i am getting this error, plz guide
"No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T555A 000900 01/01/2010"
REX

Hi,
did you ensure there is a PSG grouping maintained in table V_001P_H for Time Recording for this new PA?
It appears that you have some basic gaps in Time Eval
config.
You may want to first define/check all the PSG
GROUPINGS (like for Abences, Attendance, Time Rec,
PCR) for the new Pers Area. Then check if the tables
like 555A , 555Y, 554S.... have the line items defined
for that grpg.
Based on yr question, looks like the Time Type 5570 is
missing in table 555A for PSG gp for Time Rec 10.
And the table 555Y is missing a line entry (defined
the Processing Type & Time type for this combination)
with PSG Gp for Time Rec 10 & Time Type Det Gp =02 &
Pr Type/Time TYpe class = 00.
Probably the pointers below will help you configure
555Y & :
The 10 in [100200] points to PSG Grpg for Time
Recording. (you hv grouped your new personnal area to
10)
The 02 in [100200] points to the Time Type
determination gp (check MODIF T in PCR TMON or the
custom rule related to that ).
The absence type's CLTIM is 00.
Regards,
Sandip Biswas

No entry in table $ for key $ 554C 1004

Hi Experts,
While running payroll--for some employees the following error is coming:
No entry in table $ for key $ 554C 1004
Technical error no. 72
18.04.2009 Processing terminated for EE
here date 18.04.2009 indicates that the EE has taken Privilege Leave on that day similarly the EEs who have taken privilage leaves/sick leaves in April the same error is coming.
Pls help to ressolve this issue as tis error is coming only for some employees not for all.
Thanls,
Rajesh

Hi,
In the table V_T554L following are the values:
01     Unpaid Leave
02     Paid Leave
11     Unpaid Leave
12     Unpaid Leave (Half)
In table V_554S_G the values are:
Privilege Leave      01.01.1990     31.12.9999     02
Casual Leave      01.01.1990     31.12.9999     02
Sick leave                      01.01.1990     31.12.9999     02
In table V_T554E the values are:
11     Unpaid absences
12     Unpaid absences (Half)
In table V_T554C the values are:
01     01     Unpaid Leave          01.01.1990     31.12.9999
01     11     Unpaid Leave          01.01.1990     31.12.9999
01     12     Unpaid Leave (Half)          01.01.1990     31.12.9999
I think I have maintained all the groupings even though the error is coming for PL,SLand CL.
Regards,
Rajesh

No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T511K    40DELIM                ##ఀ 29.0

Hi Frnds,
While generating the Time evaluation(Positive) system throwing error as
"No entry in table $ for key $ at $ T511K    40DELIM                ##ఀ 29.0".
Technical error no. 72
29.01.2013 Processing terminated for EE 00007239 NEETI OSDEN MACHADO.
What i have maintian in table"V_t511k".
Please suggest me what to maintain and how to maintian tha entries in the table V_T511K.
Appreciate your answers
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Basha

Hi VIvek,
While generating time eveluation i'm getting another issue.
sytem throwing error as "
No entry in table T556P for key    24000                       at 20130301
Person rejected: 00007240"
Could you please suggest me y system throwing above error.
Regards,
M.Basha.

No entry in table for key T012K

hi
I am getting an error with Pre-DME "No entry in table for key : T012K"
I am getting this for all the company codes except one which is the sending company code , everything is maintained correctly like the DTAKT feature and all the company codes are assigned to the correct sending company code
Any solutions ...thanks

[Please check this link.|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/ProblemwithfeatureDTAKTinPre-programDME]
I alway recommend you enter the error message in google or in SDN search first before you open a thread. This would save our time!!

Entry in SLD for SAP delivered software component contents

Hi
I have a predelivered software component version ( SWCV ) ESA ECC-SE 602 which I imported into IR ( by setting the *tpz file in the appropriate folder and the imported from IR ) This worked ok. Now I have a custom SWCV - that I created in SLD. Before importing this into IR , I want to create a install time dependency from this custom SWCV pointing to the standard. SWCV.
Question is : Where is the entry in SLD for the SAP standard SWCV - i.e ESA ECC-SE 602 - without this entry - in SLD - how can I point my custom SWCV to ESA ECC-SE 602 ? Or is there any other zip file apart from the *tpz file that is available in marketplace for ESA ECC-SE 602 that I need to import into SLD ? I am stuck at the point of defining the dependency with this question.

Hi
I see that in IR , the SAP std software component has the following name ECC-SE, version 602 . But I do not see a corresponding entry for this in the software catalog in the SLD.
*Question is - should an entry be created automatically in SLD under the software catalog for all SAP delivered contents whenever the tpz file is imported into the IR ? I don't see it created in our case. What is missing ?

TCURX entry in BW for JPY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for