Teathered Capture Module or Capture One Raw Data Importer

Question

In many commerical professional studios people like to use Capture One Pro in a teathered environment because it works with most cameras, its got an interface that is productive as images stream in (ie- updating white balance, checking focus, checking color number exposure thresholds, overlaying comps) and it's much faster at loading previews than capturing into a hot folder situation like Lightroom has it now.  All in all, Capture One is better for live capture teathered environments.
There is a giant problem with capture one, that is that the raw image data created through adjustments in capture one is propietary to capture one and can't be imported into Lightroom for archiving without losing that valuable data.  Therefore, i'm either requesting that you either create a Capture Module that is as quick, effiecent and has all the productive tools that capture one has so that we can ditch the glitchy program or create a way to import raw files from capture one to lightroom and maintain the same image appearance.

Answer 1

I agree, C1 pro 5 has made leaps and bounds in the last few years from 3.7.  I like it as a capture program but not as a method for organizing and archiving my images.  I wish the two could communicate better in a fashion that doesn't require a work around.  It's a real workflow issue.