TEHO or Calling over WAN

Hello ,
I need your advice on what to do to make this work please.
I am having problem in translation-rule on CME, I have 4 VOIP Dial-peers to remote branche office, the other three Brache office are fine
but the fourth one has the same extension as Frankfur (Main - Office).
Berlin-CME has 201 - 210 Extension number, while Frankfurt-CME has 2001 - 2040 Extension Number.
When I applied destination-pattern 2../(20X) on Berlin Dial-Peer, I can call to Berlin Branch office, but i can not make call to Frankfurt Via WAN with (20XX) / 2...
When I removed 2.. on Berlin Dial-peer and created tranlation Rule 7 for Berlin on Main office CME.
The translation-rule test  works fine as it shows on MAIN-OFFICE_CME, but i can not make calls to Berlin Extension , but can call with DID number 792623.. via WAN, but 2.. is not work
I can call if i use DID number 792623..
DIAGRAM
=========
                                 /----------{WAN}-----------\ 
                               /                                  -------[CME-BERLIN]
                              /                                   /---------[CME-Frankfurt]
[MAIN-Office-CME]--/\                                  /
                                \                                /------[CME-Denmark]
                                  \---------[PSTN]----------/-----------[CME-LONDON]

Hello all,
Here is the solution;
Creat Steering code ( like Prefix) or you will have to use the T for
overlapping dial plans.
(A)
dial-peer voice 200 voip
destination-pattern 2..T
session target ipv4:10.10.X.2
=====and==
(B)
dial-peer voice 2000 voip
destination-pattern 2...
session target ipv4: 10.20.Y.2
You can press # so you don't have to wait 10 seconds, but you will
either create a steering code or wait 10 seconds.
HTH
Dak

Similar Messages

  • Share disks over wan option missing

    I have a Time Capsule (firmware 7.6.1) I am setting up with the Airport Utility (version 6.1).  I am trying to share the internal drive (or even a drive connected through the USB port) externally on the internet so that I can access files remotely.  I keep reading about an option to "share disks over WAN" that is supposedly on the "Disks" page of the Airport Utility.  The problem is, this option is not present - at least not for me.
    The "Disks" page has a list of partitions, a button to "Erase Disk", a checkbox to "Enable file sharing", and a drop-down called "Secure Shared Disks" - that's it for options.
    Any ideas why I don't see this option?
    Brian

    "As I write this, I am using my wife's iPad to browse files and folders on the Time Capsule disk. I can switch over to the disk attached to the AirPort Extreme with a single tap."
    Awesome!  Hopefully I will have the same luck as you!
    "I said that Filebrowser will do a very nice job. One of my support policies is that I never offer advice or instructions unless I have done it myself.  "
    Well that's good to know going forward!
    "Make sense?"
    Yep - no confusion whatsoever.
    Brian

  • InDesign CS6 Std working and accessing ID files over WAN.

    Could you please share experiences Windows 7 64 bit InDesign CS6 Std opening and working with 100-120MB files over public ISP WAN using VPN?
    Right now  very often we experience unresponsive screens of CS6, while nothing happens during 10 minutes and ID needs to be closed from Task manager.
    Usually this is a result of some action, ID button or mouse click.
    Background is, that enterprise has a central InDesign file depository, where ID files can be accessed and worked with from different countries.
    While transfer speed of our local ISP is 20/10 Mbit, depository side server real life bandwidth and server access speeds are variable and unknown.
    Is there some option to set up in local PC, which could improve performance over WAN?

    I agree with Bob. For best performance, I'd recommend copying the files locally if possible. Although it's very common to work over a LAN, I beleive that Adobe's official policy is that they don't support working over a network. What this means is that if you call Adobe support with a problem, they'll have you copy the file locally. If that solves the problem, they're done. This is their way of avoiding network troubleshooting for hundreds of different types of servers.

  • CCX 8.5 in HA over WAN on Island Mode

    Hi guys,
    Does anyone know what will happen with CCX 8.5 in HA over WAN configuration goes to island mode?
    So consider the following setup
    Site A Site B
    CUCM Node --- WAN --- CUCM Node
    CCX Primary CCX Standby
    Each site have their own local voice gateway and sets of agents.
    The SRND covers that if 10 consecutive heartbeat is lost then a failover will be triggered.
    However the SRND does not cover the scenario if the WAN is totally cut and Site A and Site B is completely isolated from each other.
    Does anyone know what will happen in this situation? Will both CCX Node become Primary and operate in its own right (just like Unity Connection cluster when they go to island mode)?
    Kind regards
    Daniel

    Daniel,
    Here is more of a "step by step" to your question:
    Page 68:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/design/uccx851srnd.pdf
    When the WAN link has a clean break:
    and by clean break I mean it goes down and stays down, it does not
    flap or provide intermittent connectivity
    1) The CAD agents will connect to UCCX server that they can communicate with
    2) The UCCX servers will connect to the CUCM Node that they can connect
    to for call processing
    3) The calls that get to the respective UCCX servers will go to the
    respective agents
    When the WAN Link is restored:
    1) The Nodes will decide which node is more "qualified" to become the
    master node, this is generally Node 1 aka the first node that was built
    in the cluster
    2) The CAD Agents connected to the node that becomes the secondary will
    fail over to Node 1 to begin accepting calls from it
    3) All of the calls that the new master Node were processing will not
    have any negative affect as they will continue to be processed by UCCX
    4) The calls that are in queue for the node that becomes the slave in
    the cluster will be dropped

  • FXO traffic is going over Wan link after enabling QoS

    Hi,
    We have CCM 5.0,2811 voice gateway,1 4FXO and 1 g.shdsl card on it. 4 Telco lines are on 4FXO card.CCM is at the other side of g.shdsl line.Topology like that,
    2811 ---------------- CCM
    4fxo g.shdsl
    When a call receives from FXO port, system is working normally without QoS. When we enable QoS traffic,traffic is going over wan link then return again.Because of that,delays and timeouts occuring.Router's config is at the attachment. Please Help!
    Thank you

    Check your H323 gateway config in CCM to be sure the Media Termination Point Required box is unchecked. Using MTP forces the call to terminate on the closest MTP resource which is likely at your CCM site.
    Please rate helpful posts.
    Dave

  • Sharing an iTunes Library over WAN?

    Sorry if this question has been asked before but my searching of the forum here has only seemed to turn up questions and anwswers on sharing over a local network. Here is my question.
    Is it possible to share an iTunes library over the internet? And if so, how? If it isn't I'd like to know so I can stop trying to track down how to do this.
    I have a Titanium G4 at home running iTunes 6.01 using a cable modem and router. The router firewall has been setup with the proper ports for iTunes and FTP (FTP works fine). My work computer is a G5 running iTunes 6.01 connected via a DSL modem/router.
    I have no other issues connecting to my home computer from work, but I can't see my shared music at home on my work computer.
    Thanks for any info.

    Issue solved. Here is what I did. I setup my Mac at home so I could connect at work. Inside the iTunes library on my work Mac I created an alias to the iTunes Music folder on my home Mac. Since my library at home and work are exactly the same iTunes on my work Mac sees a local library file but is streaming the music over WAN from my Mac at home.
    The are some stops and starts as the connection is over WAN, but it's pretty smooth. Do not know what will happen if I need to add or subtract from the library on either Mac.
    Just bringing this to the front in case anyone is interested in trying it themselves.

  • Voice/video calling over BBM is no longer available for OS 10.3.1.1565

    After updating to OS 10.3.1.1565 for my BB Passport voice/video calling over BBM is no
    longer available. I CANNOT MAKE VOICE OR VIDEO CALLS OVER BBM neither I CAN RECEIVE CALLS
    OVER BBM. I do use voice calling over bbm on a daily basis and I feel like I am now without
    my phone!
    I did update ALL the application offered for the update. Right now there are NO applications
    available for the update - all are up-to-date.
    BB World indicates I use BBM 10.6.4.10. I did REFRESH BB World with no changes. Yet NO UPDATES
    are offered.
    When I select the BBM application in BB World among the list of Installed application it
    says in red color "Unavailable for this device".
    I see some use BBM 10.6.5.10. Are there troubles with voice/video calling over BBM for
    10.6.5.10 & OS 10.3.1.1565?
    Maybe the bug is with BB World that is to be updated itself? But it does not offer me to
    update one.
    Does anyone have an idea how to fix that?
    Thanks!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I wish I new how to update
    I have purchased yesterday BB Classic for my wife and also updated OS for it.
    BBM works flawlessly with OS 10.3.1.1565 and preinstalled BBM 10.5.15.19. However its also indicates in red that the application is "Unavailable for this device".
    Anyone from Blackberry, would you please suggest how to update BBM in my case?! It is that vital for me.
    Thanks.

  • Airport Extreme and External Hard Drive. Backup over WAN?

    Hi
    I'm new to Mac's and just got a macbook air and a airport extreme.  I connected my external hard (toshiba) drive to the AE and my computer will recognize it, but when I try to connect to it using Time Machine my external hard drive is not recognized as a device that I can backup to over my WAN.  I'm not sure if this is possible, but I would like to be able to backup over the WAN if it is possible.  Is it possible to backup using time machine over WAN using an AE and a non apple external hard drive?

    Time Machine cannot backup to a hard drive unless it is formatted in Mac OS Extended (Journaled), also known as HFS+.
    You have me scratching my head about backing up through the WAN port. Normally, the WAN port would be used for a connection from a modem.....or another router.
    However, if you have the AirPort Extreme configured to connect to another router via Ethernet, and the AirPort Extreme is set to operate in Bridge Mode, then you don't have a WAN port, they are all LAN ports, so it would not matter which of the ports that you used.

  • Time Capsule 2TB missing "Share Disks over WAN" option

    I bought a time capsule about a month ago. Setup was no problem. Have a MobileMe account. Successfully setup remote access using MobileMe. Needed to select "Share Disks Over WAN" under the file sharing tab which is under the disk tab in setup in order to make it work.
    Bought another time capsule yesterday and trying to setup in another location. This model does not have that "Share Disks Over WAN" option. Am I missing something? Did Apple make a change? I am not able to access this new drive remotely now, even with my MobileMe account active.

    "As I write this, I am using my wife's iPad to browse files and folders on the Time Capsule disk. I can switch over to the disk attached to the AirPort Extreme with a single tap."
    Awesome!  Hopefully I will have the same luck as you!
    "I said that Filebrowser will do a very nice job. One of my support policies is that I never offer advice or instructions unless I have done it myself.  "
    Well that's good to know going forward!
    "Make sense?"
    Yep - no confusion whatsoever.
    Brian

  • The whole configure over WAN thing is confusing me I don't want anyone to be able to access my airport extreme over the WAN.  How can I check to make sure that is the way I have it setup?

    I just bought a new airport extreme and I want to make sure that is NOT set up for "configure over WAN".  How do I check to make sure that is how I have it set up?  I only want access to the base via WPA2 password

    Open AirPort Utility, select the AirPort Extreme, and click Manual Setup
    Click the Base Station tab located just below the row of icons
    Remove any check mark that might be in the box next to Allow Setup over WAN
    Click Update to save your settings and the AirPort Extreme will restart in 25-30 seconds
    For what it is worth, if you leave the box checked, any computer that tries to access the settings on the Airport Extreme will be asked for the device password....not the wireless network password.

  • Bonjour & disk sharing over WAN -Expert/Genius help required

    *Goal: Learn how to connect to my USB hard disk over WAN, share drive with specific people.*
    I'm trying to figure out how to remotely access my data on the external drive via connected via USB to my AEBN.
    I've spent several hours dinking around with my router, trying to see if I can access the drive over the WAN. I haven't found any manuals, discussions, or K-Base articles that spell it out for me. Below is a list of things I've done. Please indicate whether they are relevant, and if possible what the procedure is. Thanks:
    Conditions: I have a static IP address and through the DHCP tab I have assigned all attached machines a static LAN IP address.
    *1. Airport>Base Station: Allow configuration over Ethernet WAN port.* I've checked this box and can remotely admin my AEBN from my PC laptop (XP) via the Airport Utility.
    *2. Airport>Access Control: MAC Address Access Control.* I didn't know if this would help or hurt anything so I added the MAC address for all ethernet and wireless ports connected to my network and given unlimited or untimed access. +No noticeable difference.+
    *3. Internet>DHCP: DHCP Reservations.* As mentioned above in conditions, I've assigned an internal IP address for each device's ethernet and wireless ports, based on the MAC address. +Seems like this and Access Control are redundant except for the time settings.+
    *4. Disks>File Sharing:* Enable file sharing is checked, with accounts (configured), "Share disks over ethernet WAN port" is also checked, as is "Advertise disks globally using Bonjour". Not sure what to put in the bottom two fields (Workgroup and WINS Server) so they're blank.
    *5. Advanced>Port Mapping:* I've assigned ports to my iMac for gaming and SSH access but I don't think these would effect the USB disk would they?
    *6. Advanced>Bonjour:* "Use a wide-area hostname" is checked. My LAN network name is in the Hostname field, for Domain I just typed my WAN IP address, and I put something in for Name and Password.
    I'd love any assistance to figure this out.
    Lastly, how does Bonjour help over the WAN? Is there some sort of Bonjour application I open log-in, like FTP client software?

    Since this discussion has now been resurrected...
    The advice provided by chrisfenix will allow you to access the Airport drive from a PC on your private LAN.
    The preceding discussion, however, was on the topic of accessing the Airport drive remotely over the internet. To do that, you could still use the advice provided by chrisfenix but substitute the public IP address of the Base Station. To find that out (and answer a question posed earlier in this discussion as well) just go to http://whatismyip.com/ from any computer on your own network.
    To answer a question posed by the originator of this discussion - Bonjour is not at all necessary for remote access of the Airport drive. Those people who know how to use this feature will know what it is for and how to implement it - the rest of us can just pretend this feature doesn't exist.

  • Where to place files and folder in shared disk over WAN

    Hello, I have a new Airport Time Capsule 3TB and I want to share my disk over WAN for remote accessing.
    When I log to the server with my MacBook or iPhone, I see "Data" folder, and inside it I see my Time Machine backups.
    My question is: where, -in the Time Capsule disk-, do I have to place the files / folders that I want to share over WAN. I am afraid to damage or corrupt my Time Capsule backups.
    Thank you in advance.

    It is not possible to partition the Time Capsule drive.....unless you.....
    Pull the drive from the Time Capsule case....(voids the warranty)
    Install the drive in a separate enclosure or caddy
    Connect the enclosure directly to your Mac
    Use Disk Utility to partition the drive
    Reinstall the drive back in the Time Capsule
    This is a lot of work....and should best be left to a technician.
    All things considered, it would be better if you dedicated the Time Capsule for Time Machine backups only...and added another drive for your shared file needs, but few users seem willing to do this.

  • Multicast server/client over wan

    Ok, first of I am kinda new in programming network stuff.
    Then I am gonna try to be clear in the things that I am trying to accomplish.
    The environement.
    I have a machine A that has 2 interfaces :
    eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:20:96:CE:96
    inet addr:192.168.1.49 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:2328871 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:355492 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:178361234 (170.0 Mb) TX bytes:34186479 (32.6 Mb)
    Interrupt:11
    eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:45:74:EC
    inet addr:192.168.2.2 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:813915 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:7538202 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:53318289 (50.8 Mb) TX bytes:1092719670 (1042.0 Mb)
    Interrupt:15 Base address:0x3000 Memory:f7ee0000-f7f00000
    lo Link encap:Local Loopback
    inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
    UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
    RX packets:56496 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:56496 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:7952617 (7.5 Mb) TX bytes:7952617 (7.5 Mb)
    This machine is connected thru a router
    The routers connects to a WAN with MULTICAST enabled
    then another router to which the second machine is connected
    MACHINE B
    eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:20:96:0F:94
    inet addr:192.168.1.58 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:2322957 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:363116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:177550404 (169.3 Mb) TX bytes:33507499 (31.9 Mb)
    Interrupt:30
    eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:23:45:78:90
    inet addr:192.168.3.2 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:160838 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:6781 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:11450177 (10.9 Mb) TX bytes:746369 (728.8 Kb)
    Interrupt:28 Base address:0x3000 Memory:f7ee0000-f7f00000
    lo Link encap:Local Loopback
    inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
    UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
    RX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:23916 (23.3 Kb) TX bytes:23916 (23.3 Kb)
    The two machine are on different networks.
    My goal is to have Machine A send multicast data thru eth2 to be sent in the wan and to be received by Machine B on eth2 too.
    Obviously the two machine are on separated networks.
    I have tried everything I could but I cannot get machine B to pickup the messages sent by A. It worked fine when on the same LAN but not over WAN.
    The multicast address that I use it 239.55.55.80 and the port 4445.
    I think I have a problem to link the interface to my app ( I used setInterface and setNetworkinterface but nithing.) Also I cannot firgure out if the things that I am doing wrong are on the server or the client.
    Here is the code for the sever and client.
    SERVER
    package com.cme.multicastijector.server;
    * <p>Title: </p>
    * <p>Description: </p>
    * <p>Copyright: Copyright (c) 2004</p>
    * <p>Company: </p>
    * @author not attributable
    * @version 1.0
    import java.net.*;
    import java.util.*;
    public class MulticastOutputSocket {
    private int m_multicastPort = 0;
    private MulticastSocket m_multicastSocket = null;
    private InetAddress m_interfaceAddress = null;
    private InetAddress m_multicastAddress = null;
    private InetSocketAddress m_inetSocketAddress = null;
    private int m_bufferSize = 0;
    private byte[] m_outputBuffer = null;
    private DatagramPacket m_packet = null;
    public MulticastOutputSocket(int portNumber,String interfaceAddress,String multicastAddress,int bufferSize) throws Exception{
    System.out.println("\nStarting multicast output socket");
    m_multicastPort = portNumber;
    m_interfaceAddress = InetAddress.getByName(interfaceAddress);
    m_multicastAddress = InetAddress.getByName(multicastAddress);
    m_bufferSize = bufferSize;
    m_inetSocketAddress = new InetSocketAddress(m_multicastAddress,m_multicastPort);
    m_multicastSocket = new MulticastSocket (m_multicastPort);
    // m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
    m_multicastSocket.setNetworkInterface(NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
    // m_multicastSocket.setLoopbackMode(false);
    // m_multicastSocket.setTimeToLive(32);
    Enumeration e = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces();
    while (e.hasMoreElements()){
    System.out.println(e.nextElement().toString());
    System.out.println("Interface Address = " + m_interfaceAddress);
    System.out.println("Multicast Address = " + m_multicastAddress);
    System.out.println("Port = " + m_multicastPort);
    System.out.println("BufferSize = " + m_bufferSize);
    System.out.println("MulticastSockect initialized.\n");
    public void sendData(String data) throws Exception{
    m_outputBuffer = new byte[m_bufferSize];
    m_outputBuffer = data.getBytes();
    //m_packet = new DatagramPacket(m_outputBuffer, m_outputBuffer.length);
    m_packet = new DatagramPacket(m_outputBuffer, m_outputBuffer.length, m_inetSocketAddress);
    m_multicastSocket.send(m_packet);
    public void closeSocket() throws Exception {
    //m_multicastSocket.leaveGroup(m_multicastAddress);
    //m_multicastSocket.leaveGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
    m_multicastSocket.close();
    CLIENT
    package com.cme.multicastijector.client;
    * <p>Title: </p>
    * <p>Description: </p>
    * <p>Copyright: Copyright (c) 2004</p>
    * <p>Company: </p>
    * @author not attributable
    * @version 1.0
    import java.io.*;
    import java.net.*;
    import java.util.*;
    public class MulticastClient {
    private Properties m_prop = null;
    private MulticastSocket m_multicastSocket = null;
    private InetAddress m_interfaceAddress = null;
    private InetAddress m_multicastAddress = null;
    private InetSocketAddress m_inetSocketAddress = null;
    private int m_multicastPort = 0;
    private int m_bufferSize = 0;
    private int m_previousSeq = 0;
    private boolean m_isFirst = true;
    private int m_actualseq = 0;
    private int m_msgLost = 0;
    private int m_messagesReceived = 0;
    private Object m_seqLock = new Object();
    private Object m_msgLock = new Object();
    public MulticastClient(Properties properties) throws Exception{
    m_prop = properties;
    init();
    new TpsCalculator();
    receiveData();
    private void init() throws Exception{
    m_multicastPort = Integer.parseInt(m_prop.getProperty("MULTICAST_PORT"));
    m_multicastAddress = InetAddress.getByName(m_prop.getProperty("MULTICAST_ADDRESS"));
    m_interfaceAddress = InetAddress.getByName(m_prop.getProperty("INTERFACE_ADDRESS"));
    m_bufferSize = Integer.parseInt(m_prop.getProperty("BUFFER_SIZE"));
    m_inetSocketAddress = new InetSocketAddress(m_multicastAddress,m_multicastPort);
    m_multicastSocket = new MulticastSocket (m_multicastPort);
    // System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getInterface() );
    // System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getNetworkInterface() );
    // m_multicastSocket.setInterface(m_interfaceAddress);
    // m_multicastSocket.setNetworkInterface(NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
    // System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getInterface() );
    // System.out.println("DEFAULT INTERFACE : " + m_multicastSocket.getNetworkInterface() );
    m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_inetSocketAddress,NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(m_interfaceAddress));
    // m_multicastSocket.joinGroup(m_multicastAddress);
    System.out.println("Interface Address = " + m_interfaceAddress);
    System.out.println("Multicast Address = " + m_multicastAddress);
    System.out.println("Port = " + m_multicastPort);
    System.out.println("BufferSize = " + m_bufferSize);
    private void receiveData() throws Exception{
    try {
    String received = null;
    byte[] inputBuffer = null;
    DatagramPacket packet = null;
    while(true){
    inputBuffer = new byte[m_bufferSize];
    packet = new DatagramPacket(inputBuffer, inputBuffer.length, m_inetSocketAddress);
    m_multicastSocket.receive(packet);
    received = new String(packet.getData());
    m_messagesReceived++;
    synchronized(m_seqLock){
    m_actualseq = getSequence(received);
    checkSequence(m_actualseq);
    catch (Exception ex) {
    ex.printStackTrace();
    m_multicastSocket.close();
    private int getSequence(String data){
    return Integer.parseInt(data.substring(0,15));
    private void checkSequence(int actual){
    if(m_isFirst){
    m_isFirst = false;
    m_previousSeq = actual;
    else{
    if ( (m_previousSeq + 1) != actual) {
    synchronized(m_msgLock){
    m_msgLost += (actual - m_previousSeq)-1;
    m_previousSeq = actual;
    private class TpsCalculator extends TimerTask{
    private Timer aTimer;
    private int previousSeq = 0;
    private int tpsSeq = 0;
    private int tpsRec = 0;
    private boolean first = true;
    private int msglost = 0;
    private int previousMsgRec = 0;
    private int actualMsgRec = 0;
    public TpsCalculator(){
    aTimer = new Timer();
    aTimer.scheduleAtFixedRate(this,new Date(),1000);
    System.out.println("#####################################################");
    System.out.println("time,tps from sequences, actual tps,total msg received,msglost");
    public void run(){
    actualMsgRec = m_messagesReceived;
    tpsRec = actualMsgRec - previousMsgRec;
    previousMsgRec = actualMsgRec;
    if(first){
    synchronized(m_seqLock){
    previousSeq = m_actualseq;
    first = false;
    else{
    synchronized(m_msgLock){
    msglost = m_msgLost;
    m_msgLost = 0;
    synchronized(m_seqLock){
    tpsSeq = m_actualseq - previousSeq;
    previousSeq = m_actualseq;
    System.out.println(new Date()+","+tpsSeq + "," + tpsRec + "," + m_messagesReceived + "," + msglost);
    Thanks for your help.
    This is really important for the project I am working on.
    Thanks again

    never Mind I found the issue
    The default value for TTL is 1.
    I was going thru multiple routers so I incremented the value and it worked
    thanks

  • Multi-master over WAN ?

    When will Multi-Master over WAN being supported ?
    Will it be in 5.2, and when will this release
    being distributed ?

    Yes...it'll be in 5.2 which is scheduled for the end of the calendar year (around December...).
    A beta version will probably be available sooner (may be just to selected customers though).
    Regards,
    Ludovic.

  • Can i play my phone calls over my car speakers?

    For some reason after installing my bluetooth I can hear my game sounds over my car stereo speakers. I've always wanted to be able to hear my phone calls over my speakers. Does anyone know if I can do this and if so, how do you set it up? Thanks.

    Sure, if your car has the right features ...
    My (and a lot of other) car(s), have a bluetooth pairing capability that includes a microphone in the car (ceiling).
    So I can play music through the car speakers, and if a phone call comes in, the music will stop (iPhone feature) and once I answer the call (which I can do from pushbuttons on the steering wheel), I can talk (through the car's microphone) and hear (through the car's speakers).
    Check out if your car is set up for this.

Maybe you are looking for