TEHO with Local Routing Group

Hi,
I was watching an online training video of setting TEHO using Local Routing Group on CUCM 8.6. However somehow I think he configured it wrong.
In his example,
He used a centralized call processing infrastructure for NY (hosts the CUCM) and CA offices. NY and CA router groups are created to contain local gateways respecitively and also assigned to corresponding device pool. When configuring Route List for the remote patterns (Pattern to reach CA numbers from NY, vice versa), he only created one RL for both patterns and only added the Standard Local Route Group to the RL… Then wrap up the configure.
To me, in order to make TEHO work, there should be one RL for each location (one for NY and one for CA) and the NY route group needs to be added into the CA RL and CA Route group needs to be added into NY RL and both RL has SLRG as secondary option.
Am I crazy or the video did it wrong...

Good catch, with what is described here, when someone in CA calls a number in CA, the CA route list would be matched and the route list would be selected which contains Standard Local Route Group (SLRG) and the device pool for CA would be checked and the CA route group would be selected.  That works as expected.  Now if a CA phone calls a NY number, the route pattern would be matched, the route list the route pattern points to would be SLRG, so the device pool of the originating device would be checked.  The CA device pool being that a CA phone placed the call would be checked for the local route group and that would be set for a CA route group, so the call would go out of a CA gateway.
What usually is done is that the route list for TEHO for the CA phone would contain, the NY route group and then SLRG in that order.  That way the call would be extended to NY first out their local gateway for TEHO and then extended to the CA local gateway if the NY gateway fails.  For NY to CA TEHO, the CA route group would be added to another route list, this time with the CA gateway first in the list followed by SLRG.

Similar Messages

  • Matching Route Patterns with standard Local Route group and Specific Route Group

    Hi
    I have a customer with CUCM 8.6 with few branches
    couple of branches in UK and few in Europe and middle east.
    I configured route patterns with Standard local route group, but using their own Voice gateway, everything was working fine until adding the recent branch with matching pattern 
    UK has a mobile pattern with 9.07XXXXXXXXX (11 digits)
    One Branch has a mobile with 9.07XXXXXXXX (10 digits)
    When branch call 907X..(10digit) number there was a delay and I ticked the Urgent priority to process it quicker, but later realized the UK branch cannot dial 907x.. (11Digit) mobile.
    I created Route List for branch and added the 10 digit pattern to that but still the UK cannot call 11 digit. so i believe when you call out it will check the pattern first and the Route-List and Route-Group and gateway play a part.
    Is there a way to get 07 -10digit call out quickly also allowing the 07 -11digit pattern as well ( without changing the T302 timer)
    Really appreciate your support
    thanks
    shameer

    Yes, they key to managing overlapping centralized dial plans is to be really good with patterns, partitions, and CSSs. You can have 3 different 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX patterns and assign them a different partition, and then assign that to the branch CSS. This will only work if each Branch has a different CSS.
    For example:
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX @ Egypt-PT ->Routes to Local route group of Egypt.
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT -> Routes to Local route group of UK
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ Germany-PT -> Routes to Local Route group of Germany.
    //PT = partition//
    Then have Egypt-CSS that contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX @ Egypt-PT. 
    UK-CSS contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT
    Germany- CSS contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT
    The other patterns will be invisible to your sites because they are in a different partition that is not in their CSS. 2 overlapping patterns in the same PT will cause you to wait for the inter-digit timeout unless you press #.
    Thanks,
    Frank

  • Utilizing the Standard Local Route Group with CER

    Hello,
    I'm running UCM 7.1(2) and recently a contractor we brought in to install our CER 7.0(1) created a very signicicant amount of Calling Search Spaces, Route Patterns, Partitions, Route Lists and Route Groups in an effort to route calls from our 6 sites (we are centrilized with one Publisher and 6 suscribers) out the correct gateway towards the correct PSAP.
    I took the contractor's word that we needed to make such drastic additions and now I belive I made the wrong choice. We already have a Route List (PSTN_RL) that includes:
    1)Standard Local Route Group
    2) XX_RG (the backup RG)
    3) XX_RG (another backup RG)
    Most of my Directory Numbers (DN) and the Primary CER Route Point belong to one Partition (PhoneLines_PT) and I would like all the calls from the Directory Numbers associated with the PhoneLines_PT to be routed via the Route List that utilizes the Standard Local Route Group (PSTN_RL) and maintain that CER is able to "see" 911 calls.
    Can anyone tell me if I I change the PSTN_RL (Standard Local RG) associated Route Pattern Partitions to the PhoneLines_PT, will all Directory Numbers associated with the PhoneLines_PT route calls over the PSTN_RL?
    I guess I am trying to wrap a sort of reverse implementation "around my head."
    Thanks in advance for you time.

    Partition and Calling Search Space (CSS) are closely related but always confused.
    Good examples are:
    Line A and Line B in the same partition doesn't necessarily mean Line A can call Line B.
    Phone A and Phone B have the same CSS doesn't necessarily mean Phone A can call Phone B.
    Now back to the topic of LRG (Local Route Group).  A good use case would be 911 calls.  We always want 911 calls to be routed through local gateway so it can reach local PSAP.  Without LRG, you'll have to configure multiple 911 patterns (in different partitions) so you can assoicate them with different gateways.  With LRG, you just need one 911 route pattern.  Of couse that route pattern should be accessible by everyone.  To make it simple, you may put it in null partition.
    Michael
    http://htluo.blogspot.com

  • MGCP/Standard Local Route Group List question

    Hello all,
    Here is the scenario:
    Site A - CUCM Pub/Sub / MGCP gateway
    Site B - CUCM Sub / MGCP gateway
    Site C - CUCM Sub / MGCP gateway
    The sites are using the standard local route group with TEHO per location. Site A (HQ) has s discount carrier for LD, and therefore it would be cost effective to backhaul the LD from Site B and Site C to the Site A PRIs.
    Can this be accomplished while using Standard Local Route Groups or is it necessary to go back to site specific routing?
    Thanks,
    JN                

    In CUCM 9 and older you can only have a single local route group per device pool (this changed on version 10), so you will either have to define the Local or LD RG as your Local Route group and then use standard route patterns/route lists/route group configuration for the other calls, so at site B you would have (assuming local route group is local trunks):
    Local Pattern --> Standard Local RL
    911 pattern --> Standard Local RL
    LD pattern --> SiteB LD RL
    Intl pattern --> SiteB LD RL
    etc
    HTH,
    Chris

  • UCCX Redirect Step and Local Route Groups

    Hello,
    CUCM 9.1.2
    UCCX 9.0
    I have come across a situation in one of our UCCX scripts with the call redirect step where it is forwarded to a local cell phone for after hours calls. The number in the Call Redirect step is 9, followed by the 10-digit number of the cell.
    While the call does redirect successfully from the UCCX script, the call always uses the local route group of the original calling party's device. So, if the call from an IP Phone to the cell is going out the gateway where the cell number is a local call, the 9 followed by the 10 digit number works fine.
    If it's a site across the WAN, the call redirect to the cell fails because it's using LRG of the calling party's phone and thus it needs to be a long distance call.
    I kind of thought the Service Parameter Local route group for redirected calls being set to "Local route group of last redirecting party" might have addressed this, like it did for call forward all situations, but it does not seem to be the case.
    Would the recommendation be to use Call Consult Transfer instead of the Call Redirect step? This seems to work, but was wondering if there were other ways to approach it.
    Thanks for your help,
    Frank

    Hi Anthony,
    Thanks for the reply. The Call Consult Transfer step did resolve my issue, so now the call is always coming from the local site and using the LRG of the DP of the CTI ports. I previously had it set up using the Call Redirect step in the script with 9 followed by the 10-digit number, and thus it was kind of not working when calling over the WAN from remote sites.
    I should have mentioned that we recently did an CUCM / CCX upgrade. In CUCM, all call restrictions were previously done at the device level, nothing on the line. Now we have the line doing the call restrictions. So the Call Redirect step worked fine in the old environment with the 10-digit number, not so much in the new.
    But I like your suggestion about +E164 even better, since we rolled that into the upgrade as well. I tried putting the full +E164 number in the script using the Call Redirect step. Works perfectly from all sites.
    Thanks for your help.
    Frank

  • Local Route Groups vs translation to E.164

    Hello.
    Can anybody describe local route groups benefits compared to dialplan with translations to E.164?
    Let's see simple scenario. I have 3 sites - MSK, SPB and NSK. All site has phones and a gateway, each site has it's partition for termination (TERM-MSK, TERM-SPB, TERM-NSK) and a partition for translation (XLAT-MSK, XLAT-SPB, XLAT-NSK). There are 2 CSS for translation and termination for each site (CSS-X-MSK, CSS-X-SPB, CSS-X-NSK, CSS-TERM-MSK, CSS-TERM-SPB and CSS-TERM-NSK). All phones has a translation CSS local to it's site configured, for example phones at MSK has CSS-X-MSK in phone configuration. There are translation patterns for translating dialed off-net numbers to E.164 format (7495XXXXXXX for MSK, 7812XXXXXXX for SPB and 7383XXXXXXX for NSK). Subscribers uses 9 for local off-net calls and 90 for long-distance, there are 2 translation patterns with corresponding XLAT partition and CSS-TERM CSS (9.[1-9]XXXXXX -> 7495 prefix plus XXXXXXX and 90.[1-9]XXXXXXXXX -> 7 plus XXXXXXXXXX, partition XLAT-MSK, CSS CSS-TERM-MSK for MSK). CSS-X CSSes has corresponding XLAT partition only. CSS-TERM CSSes has allowed TERM patitions. Each route pattern has corresponding TERM partition and points to single route list with single route group. Finally I have 3 route patterns 3 route lists, 3 route groups, 6 partitions and 6 CSSes total).
    Using Local Route Groups I have the same 3 route patterns, 3 route lists and 3 route groups but one partition and one CSS. Pros for this scheme is less partitions and CSSes. Cons is the loss of flexibility (I can't allow calls to anywhere from MSK and only MSK and NSK for NSK and can't use different prefixes for off-net calls for each office).
    Have I understood the Features and Services Guide rignt? Is there other way to translate dialed off-net number to E.164 without using extra partitions and CSSes (Translatio Pattern requires this)?

    Maxim,
    Local Route Groups have not dependency on e.164 dial plan and vice-versa, there are independent features.  Local Route groups allow you  to consolidate your route patterns/route lists/CSS/PT, depending on complexity of your routing you can accomplish all your remote site routing via a common set of route patterns/list CSS/partitions, so routing decisions are based on local route groups assigned to device pool of the calling device rather than just the CSS.  E.164 dial plan is merely a way to structure dialed numbers, how and where you transform them is up to you, I prefer using transformation patterns vs. translation patterns for example.
    HTH,
    Chris

  • CUCM 10.5 Local Route Group

    When utilizing the local route group for a device pool, when a change is made for that device pool, does a reset of the devices have to occur for the changes to go into affect?  The reason I ask is if you are simply making the change to the Route List there is no interruption to the end users, but what if a location's Long Distance is pointing to a Route List that references a Local Route Group.  If you want move that to another route group under the device pool is there any impact on the phones in that device pool?
    Thanks,
    Joe

    So What you ask is if you modified the route list (change the actual local route Group for other route group) will reset the phones ? as far as I now no change on rl will reset phone but change on dp will..

  • Hard currency is not valuated in FAGL_FC_VAL along with local and group currency

    Hi All,
    I have the below system settings for FOREX revaluation. The revaluation is not happening for Hard currency along with local and group currency. The test data and other settings seams to be fine as the below mentioned workaround works perfectly for hard currency revaluation.
    I would like to take your expert feedback on this issue to confirm whether this is how SAP works or its an issue with FAGL_FC_VAL program.
    System Settings:
    Currencies in company code
    local currency      group currency      hard currency
    10                             30                         40
    USD                          USD                    UYU
    FOREX settings:
    Work around found:
    Define two Valuation area, say
    1. Valuation Area: A1 which will have currency type 10 and 30.
    2. Valuation Area: A2 which will have only the currency type 40.
    3. Run FAGL_FC_VAL twice for these area.
    Issue with this work around:
    1. The valuation area is assigned to one accounting principle (which is in turn assigned to a specific ledger).
    2. Thus, if I have different accounting FOREX process to be followed in different ledgers (say IFRS ledger, Local Ledger, Tax ledger) then I need to create 2 valuation area (as per above workaround) for each ledgers and run FAGL_FC_VAL for each of these valuation areas.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nikhil Kothari

    Hi Experts,
    Any views on the above issue?
    Thanks & Regards
    Nikhil Kothari

  • UNSPSC Code Mapping with Local Material Group

    Hi Experts,
    We are on SRM 7.0 SP05
    We are trying to map UNSPSC Code with R/3 Material Group, which has been replicated to SRM. We have maintained the mapping table for UNSPSC with SRM Material Group.
    We are using the BADI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER to change the UNSPSC with a corresponding material group and are modifying the internal table enriched_item_datacategory_id field. Though we are able to successfully change it in the BADI but the changes are not reflected in the shopping cart. Does anybody know why this happens? Is there an OSS note to resolve this problem?
    Appreciate your great help
    BR,
    Siva

    Muthu,
    We have not done anything with MDM but as for CCM, I can tell what we have done...
    In IMG: Supplier Relationship Management --> SRM Server --> Master Data --> Content Management, you can define your schemas and mappings.
    When shopping through a catalog, make sure the SCHEMA and the UNSPC are passed in the OCI stream.  If your scemas and mappings are straight-forward, then no addtional coding is required.  However, if this is not the case, addtional coding in BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER may be needed.
    I have seen in the forums that many have recommended custom tables and mapping code in BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.  However, I like to stick to standard as much as I can.
    This may be simplistic, but I think it will help you get a idea on the CCM side.  Sorry I could not help you with MDM. 
    Regards, Dean.

  • Is RTMT can monitor when the first Route Group of a Route List is not used ?

    Hi everyone,
    I want to find how monitor this event in RTMT without success. I hope someone will have an idea to suggest !
    My problem :
    I have one Route List (RL_Remote) wich is used to route calls between two sites. This Route List has two Route Group :
    - the first is a SIP trunk connected to my remote site (RG_SIP)
    - the second is a local route group wich used PSTN (RG_PSTN) [BACKUP]
    Is it possible that RTMT sends me an alarm when calls are routing via RL_Remote but are not using RG_SIP ?
    In fact, I want to receive an alarm as soon as the Backup Route Group (RG_PSTN in my example) is used.
    Thanks for your help !
    Have a nice day,
    Franck-Emanuel

    More or less correct yes:
    Core Issue
    This issue can occur if an available route is not found in the indicated route list.
    If  the call fails on the current gateway, Cisco CallManager attempts to  extend the call to the next route in the route list. This occurs until  it reaches the last route. If the call cannot be completed with the last  gateway, the Route List Exhausted event is logged.
    These are possible reasons for a failure on the current gateway:
    Unallocated number, such as a non-existing destination
    Busy user
    Out of bandwidth   
    Gateway fails to respond to the call setup request 
    The user receives alerts similar to this in the Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT):
    Most  Recent Alert Raised: At 09:19:27 on 12/21/2005 on cluster  CALLMANAGER1-Cluster. Number of RouteListExhausted events exceed 0  within 60 minutes.
    There  are at least five RouteListExhausted events (up to 30) received during  the monitoring interval from 09:07:27, 12/21/2005 to 10:07:27,  12/21/2005.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29032

  • Find workstations with specific group in local administrators group

    Hello,
    Is there a simple script that will search the workstations in a domain looking for the existence of a specific domain group nested in the local administrators group ?  Our desktop group can up with the idea of using domain groups nested in the local
    admin group to grant administrator privileges to specific computers.  They can list the members of the domain group easily but they have no easy way to know on what workstations they have added the group to.  Output I am looking for is simply a list
    of computers that have the specific group in the administrators group.   Any advice would be appreciated.
    Bobby

    Thisis donethrough Group Policy.  It is a special aspect of gP to set and mamintain groups on local machines.  You can protect a machine fromchanges and allow users to be added and removed.
    If you are just look ing to list tehcontents o a local group then get the module "Local Administration" in the Repository. It has all of the tools you need.
    You can also use WMI to retrieve Group memmbership.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • CVP 7.0(2) SIP RNA Timer with CUCM Hunt Group

    I have a very simple ICM 7.5(9) script which simply assigns a call type then forwards to a label on CUCM 7.1(5), which is a hunt pilot containing a hunt list with 2 line groups...a circular LG with 10 members (RNA reversion timeout of 20 sec), followed by a broadcast LG with different 10 members. There is no CFNA/CFB forwarding set up on the hunt pilot.
    In CVP, the SIP RNA timer is set on for this DN at 120 seconds, and I can see that get set in CVP logs (IP addresses and dialed numbers modified to protect customer data):
    41762417: 10.100.1.41: Dec 03 2012 20:23:28.977 -0500: %CVP_7_0_SIP-7-CALL: {Thrd=Pool:SIP[7059609]} Matched 666333315555551111 to proxy.customer.uc
    41762418: 10.100.1.41: Dec 03 2012 20:23:28.977 -0500: %CVP_7_0_SIP-7-CALL: {Thrd=Pool:SIP[7059609]} Using Local Static Route for sip:[email protected]
    41762419: 10.100.1.41: Dec 03 2012 20:23:28.977 -0500: %CVP_7_0_SIP-7-CALL: {Thrd=Pool:SIP[7059609]} Matched 666333315555551111 to TimeoutMatcher: patterns like 66633331> will use RONA of 120
    41762420: 10.100.1.41: Dec 03 2012 20:23:28.977 -0500: %CVP_7_0_SIP-7-CALL: {Thrd=Pool:SIP[7059609]} CALLGUID = 0B19E39A3CE811E28B7DA21700DE4950 LEGID = 0B19E39A3CE811E28B7DA21700DE4950-135458420897716680 - [OUTBOUND]: INVITE TO <sip:[email protected];transport=udp> FROM "--CVP" <sip:[email protected]:5060> EXPIRES[120] 100REL[Unsupported]
    The hunt group then begins hunting, and can be answered normally. However, a CANCEL is sent at 60 seconds, and I am not sure why:
    From the gateway:
    2106715: Dec  3 20:24:29.095: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
    Sent:
    CANCEL sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.1.5:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2C171513C0
    From: "--CVP" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=20687DD0-DAF
    To: <sip:[email protected]>
    Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:23:29 GMT
    Call-ID:
    [email protected]
    CSeq: 101 CANCEL
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Timestamp: 1354584269
    Reason: Q.850;cause=19
    Content-Length: 0
    From CUCM SDI traces:
    12/03/2012 20:24:29.169 CCM|//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from 10.100.3.30 on port 43568 index 566129 with 389 bytes:
    CANCEL sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.100.3.30:5060;branch=z9hG4bK51cac6f4-76fb29a5-78d5dd99-9a021233-1
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    From: "--CVP" <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=ds229f1b0f
    To: <sip:[email protected];transport=udp>
    CSeq: 1 CANCEL
    Content-Length: 0
    I am trying to determine which timer is limiting the hunt to 60 seconds.
    Can anyone suggest where I might begin looking?
    Thanks so much!!!

    I've run into a similar problem recently with a CVP 8.5(1) SIP deployment and have found in the CVP documentation that the RNA Timeout is a range configurable between 5 and 60 seconds.
    You can enter a larger value through OAMP on the Call Server-->SIP-->Advanced Configuration tab but when you Save and Deploy, it reverts back to the max of 60 seconds. The CVP help file indicates the 5-60 second range.
    Regards,
    Matt

  • Rsrb with multiple ring groups on head ends with one phy ring?

    working on an issue for a customer and I cant find good documentation on this anywhere for multiple ring-groups
    have 2 routers, each with 2 ring groups connected on a mau terminating multiple serial connections (wan, hence the rsrb) and utilizing rsrb tcp with local ack. The configuration was done sometime ago. It was set up to utilize frame which now they are using ptp t1s. I see in the remote routers they are forwarding pakcets to both routers to ring 20. (there are 2 routers if one fails then it is meant to learn its path to the CIP through the other router)
    ---------router1
    source-bridge ring-group 30
    source-bridge ring-group 31
    blahblah peers tcp local-ack
    int t0
    source-bridge 20 1 30 <----notice bridge 1
    source-bridge spanning
    int t1
    source-bridge 20 1 31 <----notice bridge 1
    source-bridge spanning
    --------router2
    source-bridge ring-group 30
    source-bridge ring-group 31
    blahblah peers tcp local-ack
    int t0
    source-bridge 20 2 30 <----notice bridge 2
    source-bridge spanning
    int t1
    source-bridge 20 2 31 <----notice bridge 2
    source-bridge spanning
    I thought the physical rings had to be different in order to run parrallel links. Or are different bridge #'s feasible? The end issue they are having is that when links bounce, they are not releasing the tcp session and the show llc shows remote sides as busy and the head end as connected. (then obviously removal of local ack fixed the issue)
    Not ready to live without local ack... could the same ring # on both routers be the issue since they are on the same mau and destined for the same location?
    ==MAU to CIP==
    | | | | all physical connection on mau are ring 20
    router1 router2
    | | | | | ring groups 30 and 31 configured on both routers with 1 statement to each router in the network per router (so each remote side is only connected to either ring group 30 or 31 (not both since you can only do over token ring) and the show source-bridge is showing forwards to each head end router's physical ring 20. I thought I would see one with forwards the other 0 since first response, but then saw the bridge # differed.)

    case was opened over a month ago with no luck or serious help. Have had great luck in the past with tac, but this one was frustrating and nothing was done.
    case#D039413
    And the remote routers connect directly to the cip with LLC2. (end to end connection, not remote to router 1 and 2 to CIP)
    show llc shows the local mac of the gateway and the cip token.
    the network goes like this
    rr = remote router
    fr= frame relay
    ptp= ptp t1
    rtr1 and rtr2 = router 1 and 2
    rr--fr--rr--ptp--rtr1 and rtr2 ---rr---cip
    I have tried numerous things on this and its apparent that the only option is dlsw and I have pressed the issue enough to start on it with test segments.
    my theory was when the host queried the gateway, its first reply was local-ack on rtr2 (could be rtr1 but for theory we will say rtr2) which was giving back RR and the other end was actually in a disconnect state and sending rnr's to the rtr1 (in this exapmple the host was talking thru rtr2 to the remote side and the remote side was trying the opposite router) which local ack would reply to the supervisor frames
    what was causing the problems in my opinion is the host provider does not utilize local ack since they only have lanned token rings and the customer provides their own wan routers. So the explorer would be answered quicker by the other router and that would be the source route bridged path to the remote side, where the other sides local ack and rif cache was routing through the opposite router. Unfortunately the site where we collected the data on I can not test since I have transitioned it to dlsw to solve their issues and show them the benfits of dlsw

  • "Lost" ICMP6 neighbor solicitation using global link or ULA, not with local link

    Hello,
    Sorry for my bad english.
    I have a strange issue with IPV6 and Airport.
    No issue with Ethenet link (native ethernet link with MacBook Pro 2007 under 10.8.3, USB ethernet link with MacBook Air 2011 under 10.8.3).
    No issue with Windows 8 via Boot Camp on Mac Book Pro 2007.
    Facts :
    ICMP6 Router sollication gets ICMP6 Router Advertissment.
    MacBook Pro and MacBook Air under 10.8.3 gets ipv6 config.
    Example for my MacBook Air :
    en0: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
            ether 04:0c:ce:da:b9:32
            inet6 fe80::60c:ceff:feda:b932%en0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
            inet6 2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932 prefixlen 64 autoconf
            inet6 2001:470:cd49:fee1:d9b3:40b6:bc67:c01b prefixlen 64 autoconf temporary
            inet6 fd00:fee1:fee1::60c:ceff:feda:b932 prefixlen 64 autoconf
            inet6 fd00:fee1:fee1::b8f6:3ec1:a7a6:f64f prefixlen 64 autoconf temporary
            inet 192.168.0.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
            media: autoselect
            status: active
    My MacBook Air gets 2 Global Link and 2 ULA from ICMP Router Advertissment from my router (DLink DIR-655 B1).
    Local Link, Global Link and first ULA adress are acquired via EUI-64.
    Others adress are random temporary address.
    Connections (tcp6, udp6, icmp6) are ok from Local Link.
    Examples :
    Ping from MacBook Air Mac Mac OS X 10.8.3 to MacBook Pro Windows 8 via Bootcamp :
    bash-3.2$ ping6 -c 1 fe80::811c:6008:f31c:2e06%en0
    PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::60c:ceff:feda:b932%en0 --> fe80::811c:6008:f31c:2e06%en0
    16 bytes from fe80::811c:6008:f31c:2e06%en0, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=11.112 ms
    This fact is true (Local Link Ok) for all combinaison (Mac OS X 10.8.3 to Mac OS X 10.8.3, Mac OS X 10.8.3 to WIndows 8, Windows 8 to Mac OS X 10.8.3).
    Issue :
    Connections (tcp6, udp6, icmp6) are note possible if "destination" is under my lived running Mac OS X 10.8.3.
    The destination element is essential.
    I can ping from Mac OS X 10.8.3 to Windows 8.
    It's why my neighbor is coherent (global, ULA, local are resolved).
    bash-3.2$ ndp -a -n
    Neighbor                        Linklayer Address  Netif Expire    St Flgs Prbs
    ::1                             (incomplete)         lo0 permanent R     
    2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932 4:c:ce:da:b9:32 en0 permanent R     
    2001:470:cd49:fee1:6438:7211:58ce:b389 0:1e:52:71:61:9d en0 23h53m57s S     
    2001:470:cd49:fee1:811c:6008:f31c:2e06 0:1e:52:71:61:9d en0 23h54m12s S     
    2001:470:cd49:fee1:d9b3:40b6:bc67:c01b 4:c:ce:da:b9:32 en0 permanent R     
    fd00:fee1:fee1::60c:ceff:feda:b932 4:c:ce:da:b9:32   en0 permanent R     
    fd00:fee1:fee1::b8f6:3ec1:a7a6:f64f 4:c:ce:da:b9:32  en0 permanent R     
    fde4:416c:c381:3388:f496:c836:ac6:dcda (incomplete) utun0 permanent R     
    fe80::1%lo0                     (incomplete)         lo0 permanent R     
    fe80::1%en0                     (incomplete)         en0 expired   N     
    fe80::60c:ceff:feda:b932%en0    4:c:ce:da:b9:32      en0 permanent R     
    fe80::3608:4ff:fee1:8ada%en0    34:8:4:e1:8a:da      en0 23h59m24s S  R  
    fe80::811c:6008:f31c:2e06%en0   0:1e:52:71:61:9d     en0 23h56m35s S     
    fe80::f496:c836:ac6:dcda%utun0  (incomplete)       utun0 permanent R  
    But :
    I can't ping from Mac OS X 10.8.3 to Mac OS X 10.8.3 if I use Global Link adress or ULA adress.
    I can't ping from Windows 8 to Mac OS X 10.8.3 if I use Global Link adress or ULA adress.
    Example (from Windows 8, I have rebooted my MacBook Pro, but effets are similars).
    C:\Windows\SysWOW64>ping -n 1 2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932
    Envoi d'une requ?te 'Ping'  2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932 avec 32 octets
    de donn?es?:
    Impossible de joindre l'h?te de destination.
    Statistiques Ping pour 2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932:
        Paquets?: envoy?s = 1, re?us = 0, perdus = 1 (perte 100%),
    Interface 12 : Wi-Fi
    Adresse Internet                              Adresse physique   Type
    2001:470:cd49:fee1::                          00-00-00-00-00-00  Inaccessible
    2001:470:cd49:fee1:60c:ceff:feda:b932         Inaccessible       Inaccessible
    fe80::60c:ceff:feda:b932                      04-0c-ce-da-b9-32  Caduque
    fe80::3608:4ff:fee1:8ada                      34-08-04-e1-8a-da  Caduque (Routeu
    r)
    ff02::1                                       33-33-00-00-00-01  Permanent
    ff02::2                                       33-33-00-00-00-02  Permanent
    ff02::c                                       33-33-00-00-00-0c  Permanent
    ff02::16                                      33-33-00-00-00-16  Permanent
    ff02::fb                                      33-33-00-00-00-fb  Permanent
    ff02::1:3                                     33-33-00-01-00-03  Permanent
    ff02::1:ff1c:2e06                             33-33-ff-1c-2e-06  Permanent
    ff02::1:ffce:b389                             33-33-ff-ce-b3-89  Permanent
    ff02::1:ffda:b932                             33-33-ff-da-b9-32  Permanent
    ff02::1:ffe1:8ada                             33-33-ff-e1-8a-da  Permanent
    Using WireShark, I noticed :
    - Destination under my 2 Lived Mac OS X 10.8.3 doesn't received ICMP6 neighbor solicitation if adress are Global Link or ULA.
    But ICMP6 neighbor sollicitation are emitted.
    No issue with Local Link address.
    Using WireShark's monitor mode, I noticed :
    - 802.11 frame are received on multicast group associated with asked IP neighbor solicitation for any kind of address.
    It seems that ICMP6 neighbor solicitation are lost between 802.11 frames and IPV6 / ICMP6 stack.
    IPV6 firewall is not configured to drop packets.
    bash-3.2$ sudo ip6fw show
    Password:
    65535          0          0 allow ipv6 from any to any
    VMWARE Fusion is installed on my Lived MacBook Air 10.8.3 and MacBook Pro 10.8.3.
    But tests are made with associated modules not loaded :
    bash-3.2$ sudo kextstat |grep -v com.apple
    Index Refs Address            Size       Wired      Name (Version) <Linked Against>
    Like I said in post beginngin, issue doesn't occurs with ethernet link, only Airport link.
    Some one can help me for this strange issue ?
    Thanks for your help !
    Philippe

    Hello,
    Thank you for your reply. It would make sense for me if R2 would not receive any packet, but it receives a request and then does not send any reply to NS sent from R1 as I showed in the example. Path to R2 which is a gateway is seen as directly connected on R1:
    R1#sh ipv6 ro
    IPv6 Routing Table - 5 entries
    Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
           U - Per-user Static route
           I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary
           O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
           ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2
    C   2001:1::/64 [0/0]
         via ::, FastEthernet0/0
    L   2001:1::2/128 [0/0]
         via ::, FastEthernet0/0
    S   2001:2::/64 [1/0]
         via ::, FastEthernet0/0
    L   FE80::/10 [0/0]
         via ::, Null0
    L   FF00::/8 [0/0]
         via ::, Null0
    I'm wondering why R2 cannot respond when its own interface has an address that I want to ping (2001:2::1)

  • Removing old exchange 2003 routing groups from Exchange 2010.

    I have migrated over to Exchange 2010(server2008) from Exchange 2003(SBS2003). I've also already run the uninstall for exchange 2003 on the old SBS 2003 server. The old server itself is still running but exchange has been removed and once I get this fixed
    I plan to fully remove the old SBS server.
    I now get event ID 5020 and 5006 throughout the day on the new server. From what I've read, this happens because the old routing group connectors still exist.
    If I run Get-ExchangeServer I get
    Name                Site                 ServerRole  Edition     AdminDisplayVersion
    SERVER                                   None       
    Standard    Version 6.5 (Bui...
    SERVER2008          hr.local/Configur... Mailbox,... Standard    Version 14.0 (Bu...
    Am I correct in assuming that the way to fix this now is to go into ADSI edit and delete records under CN=First Administrative Groups? As in delete CN=Routing Groups and CN=Servers and everything under both of those? I'd try this myself but I'm not aware
    of any way to restore those records easily if I'm wrong.
    Event ID 5006
    Cannot find route to Mailbox Server CN=SERVER,CN=Servers,CN=first administrative group,CN=Administrative Groups,CN=HR,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=hr,DC=local for store CN=Public Folder Store (SERVER),CN=First Storage Group,CN=InformationStore,CN=SERVER,CN=Servers,CN=first
    administrative group,CN=Administrative Groups,CN=HR,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=hr,DC=local in routing tables with timestamp 27/09/2014 1:57:43 PM. Recipients will not be routed to this store.
    Event ID 5020The topology doesn't contain a route to Exchange 2000 Server or Exchange Server 2003 server.hr.local in Routing Group CN=first routing group,CN=Routing Groups,CN=first administrative group,CN=Administrative
    Groups,CN=HR,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=hr,DC=local in routing tables with the timestamp 27/09/2014 1:57:43 PM.

    Get-RoutingGroupConnector shows nothing. As for the servers group. It has the old server under it as shown in the image I posted above. That's actually what stops me from just deleting it because other guides have said not to delete it if an old server
    is listed.
    Is the SBS2003 server listed because I haven't ran DCPROMO to remove it from the network yet? I am planning to do this but was waiting till I cleaned up all the errors before transferring the 5 FMSO roles and running DCPROMO on the old server.
    DCPROMO isn't related to this, no.
    So you removed Exchange already? How? With setup? It should have removed the Exchange Server object then.
    It is supported to remove Exchange 2003 manually if required with adsiedit:
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/833396
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Maybe you are looking for