Temperature readings for me MBP 15". HELLLLLPPPPPPPPPP.

Hello all,
Done some temperature testing with my MacBook Pro, 15", 2.2ghz Intel Core Duo 2, 2GB Ram, MacOS 10.5.7
Until recently my Mac fans performed perfectly. Always been very proud of the almost silent nature of all my Macs to date. I don´t load it too much, I use Mozilla running a streaming program, Mail, MSN and a Java Program which streams live information to my desktop - Nothing else is running when I get the problems. I do run a 24" Samsung from the DVI, and a 22" Samsung from a USB - DVI Adaptor (DisplayLink). I use the computer through the day every day.
As I said, until recently the fans seemed to be normal, they did kick in now and then for a few minutes, normally though only if I opened Photoshop or Quark at the same time as the programs above - This I understand. Since very recently there has been a change, the fans run almost constantly now when I have the programs running, after about 10mins after start up, they run at 6000rpm and don´t stop until I put it to sleep. Sometimes it does this even with only Mozilla open. Not only does the noise of the constant 6000rpm get on my nerves, I am worried this is going to reduce the lifespan of the computer, and also worried there may be a hardware problem now that needs to be dealt with.
When this is happening Activity Monitor says that there is plenty of CPU left to play with, normally there is more than 50% idle (70% normally to be accurate), with 700MB Free Ram and 300mb Inactive RAM .... so, only 1GB used.
Really annoying. Have reset PRAM, done the recent "Fan Hardware Upgrade" (which I thought helped at first, but did not help at all), have checked in Activity Monitor to make sure there is nothing sucking up CPU, there isn´t... I have also reset the SMC . It seems ludicrous to me that the 10.5.7 update has caused this, but it seems it must have. Everything was fine before, now I feel like chucking the computer out the window and buying a new one, although I am worried I will get the same problem with a new 2009 MBP and considering this is only just over 1 year old, I can´t afford it anyway ....
I have taken some temperature readings via iStat. I wonder if any of you can help me to try and resolve this problem ?
I am wondering if this is a RAM issue, although there always seems to be plenty of actual RAM available as long as I do not open anything heavy along with the normal programs I use.... Could this is a Virtual RAM problem ? Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
1 / 2 / 3 / 4
HD 27 / 45 / 31 / 38
CPU 37 / 76 / 41 / 74
Airport 34 / 61 / 38 / 60
Enclosure 24 / 42 / 28 / 35
GPU Diode 48 / 84 / 52 / 83
GPU Heatsink 36 / 69 / 38 / 69
Heatsink A 35 / 65 / 38 / 65
Heatsink B 27 / 51 / 32 / 47
Degrees Celcius.
1 - Totally cold, standing overnight in ambient temperature. 2000rpm fan speed.
2 - Temperatures when Fans have been on constantly for an hour or so. Mostly at 6000rpm.
3- Temperatures when computer put to sleep for 10 minutes after fans have been constantly on. Fans back to 2000rpm upon wakeup.
4- Temperatures after wake from sleep, 7-8 minutes after wake-up, fans on constantly again. At 3500rpm.

Hi again Paul,
Unfortunately SMC fan control has not worked. I was wondering how it would help to be honest, because my fans run at full speed all the time anyway (10 minutes after turning on anyway)...
All this little program does it allow me to speed the fans up from normal, which is what I want to get away from to be honest - The fans never used to run all the time ! Using this program has increased the time that it took to get up to 6000 max, but only because I set a default at 3500rpm from startup so that it took longer to get up to its overheating temperature (as it normally starts from 2000rpm).
Unless I am not using the program right ?

Similar Messages

  • Good Temperature Monitor for C2D MBP??

    Just got my 17" MBP and it's great!!
    I am new to the laptop world, so if someone can recommend a temperature monitor (preferably free) that would be great.
    It seems fine, but I'd like to be able to monitor this.
    Cheers

    It may actually be overkill......
    But this is the best one I have found:
    http://www.bresink.com/osx/HardwareMonitor.html
    It is an amazing product.
    SG
    C2D 2.16(XP)/G52.0 DUAL/MDD 1.25 DUAL/867 12 inch/ and many more   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Ambient CPU Temperature readings don't change until reboot

    Hi everyone,
    It's been a good while since I last posted on this forum and much has changed since...
    I have recently bought a second hand "Early 2005" DP 2.7 Ghz G5 Powermac and everything has been working perfectly for the last couple of months - no traces of liquid coolant spills or odd fan behaviour so far (fingers crossed). I was just hoping to compare experiences with other users concerning the following behaviour though:
    When I boot the machine from cold, both "iStat" or "Temperature Monitor" agree and correctly show the ambient temperature readings for both CPUs at actual room temperature as expected, which is usually 23ºC. This value doesn't get updated after hours of use until I reboot no matter into which OS. It will then show an updated value - usually ~40ºC which seems reasonably accurate.
    I can replicate this in Tiger (10.4.11) and Leopard (10.5.8) using the same versions of both apps so it would seem as though the ambient temperature sensors only get read once at boot time rather than being polled at intervals like the the remaining sensors (HDD, CPU core, Backside and Drive Bay).
    Has anyone else ever noticed this behaviour?
    These are my usual temperature readings and fan speeds in "Reduced" processor performance, for future reference:
    !http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z126/thearchit/Apple%20Forum/iStatscreen01.png!
    Cheers!

    Hello The hatter,
    (WARNING: long post!)
    As previously mentioned, when I set this machine up I decided to have all three Operating Systems on it, since some apps may be compatible with one but not the other, and with 2TB of available space I couldn't see a reason why not to, so I proceeded with a fresh install of Panther, Tiger and Leopard.
    I use Leopard for web and email, and Panther for audio recording. Tiger remains largely unused. Ok, I confess to have played Call of Duty 2 once - for testing purposes, of course
    As the described behaviour occurs for both CPU Ambient Sensors, I'm ruling out any hardware defects. It could be something at a lower hardware level, Open Firmware, or limited OS API support. (i.e - AppleAD741x .kext)
    Quite possibly, fan/pump thermal management doesn't care about readings from CPU ambient sensors. They may be there merely for informational purposes. For example, there is also a 3rd room temperature ambient sensor placed at the front of the tower, right beneath the front speaker/fan assembly that I've not seen it listed in either "Temperature Monitor" or "iStat", hence my reasoning that it is possible that the OS is actually polling these sensors on wake and bootup, but there may be no way of polling them manually on runtime due to the aforementioned API limitations or else.
    I could contact the developers of iStat and Temperature Monitor to find out what they may know about it, as they are probably best placed to answer queries like these apart from Apple themselves, of course. But I hesitate about bothering them, as I haven't made any contributions and they have already given so much to the community for free.
    I really wish that someone could test this to confirm it is expected behaviour. i.e. CPU ambient sensors only get polled at system boot or wake from sleep.
    I've run iostat -l using the terminal and something caught my eye.
    I'm guessing this should be the main object definition for all CPU B's hardware sensors. There's an interesting "platform-do-reset-on-wake" parameter:
    (output clipped to 80 lines width)
    | | | +-o supply-monitor@5a <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matche$
    | | | | | {
    | | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <0000000000000000000000000000000000000000$
    | | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <","adc","adc","adc">
    *| | | | | "platform-do-reset-on-wake" = <0000000010000000000000000000$*
    | | | | | "hwsensor-location" = <"hwsensor-id" = <0000000f00000010000000110000001200000013>
    | | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff989230>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a0000000a0000000a000000$
    | | | | | "built-in" =
    | | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "name" = <" = <">
    | | | | | "compatible" = <" = <0000005a>
    | | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
    | | | | | }
    Presumably, AMB stands for "Ambient" and ADC for "Analog Devices" Controller, the sensor manufacturer, most likely.
    AD1 looks like this, and AD2,3,4 look the same:
    | | | | +-o adc-sensor <class IOService, registered, matched, active$
    | | | | | | {
    | | | | | | "zone" = <00000000>
    | | | | | | "location" = "CPU B AD7417 AD1"
    | | | | | | "name" = <" = <">
    | | | | | | "polling-period" = <0000000a>
    | | | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000001>
    | | | | | | "type" = "adc"
    | | | | | | "sensor-id" = <00000010>
    | | | | | | }
    | | | | | |
    | | | | | +-o IOHWSensor <class IOHWSensor, registered, matched, act$
    | | | | | {
    | | | | | "IOProbeScore" = 0
    | | | | | "current-value" = 575
    | | | | | "CFBundleIdentifier" = "com.apple.driver.AppleHWSenso$
    | | | | | "polling-period-ns" = 18446744073709551615
    | | | | | "IOPropertyMatch" = {"device_type"="adc-sensor"}
    | | | | | "IOMatchCategory" = "IODefaultMatchCategory"
    | | | | | "version" = 1
    | | | | | "type" = "adc"
    | | | | | "IOPowerManagement" = {"CurrentPowerState"=1}
    | | | | | "IOProviderClass" = "IOService"
    | | | | | "zone" = <00000000>
    | | | | | "location" = "CPU B AD7417 AD1"
    | | | | | "polling-period" = 18446744073709551615
    | | | | | "IOClass" = "IOHWSensor"
    | | | | | "sensor-id" = 16
    | | | | | }
    | | | | |
    Interestingly, after parsing "ioreg -l" output further, I can find objects for every sensor available to "iStat" when looking for its exact name, for example "Backside", "U3 Heatsink", "Drive Bay":
    | | | +-o temp-monitor@98 <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matched,$
    | | | | | {
    | | | | | "platform-do-set-conversion-rate" = <0000000090000000000000$
    | | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <0000000400000004>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <">
    *| | | | | "hwsensor-location" = <">*
    | | | | | "external-high-limit" = <00000055>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-id" = <0000000600000007>
    | | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff9794f8>
    | | | | | "internal-high-limit" = <00000055>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a0000000a>
    | | | | | "built-in" =
    | | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "internal-low-limit" = <0000000a>
    | | | | | "platform-do-set-limits" = <0000000010000000000000000000000$
    | | | | | "name" = <" = <">
    | | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000098>
    | | | | | "external-low-limit" = <0000000a>
    | | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
    | | | | | }
    | | | | |
    | | | +-o temp-monitor@94 <class PPCI2CInterface, registered, matched,$
    | | | | | {
    | | | | | "#address-cells" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-zone" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-type" = <" = <">*
    | | | | | "hwsensor-id" = <00000004>
    | | | | | "AAPL,phandle" = <ff978b90>
    | | | | | "hwsensor-polling-period" = <0000000a>
    | | | | | "built-in" =
    | | | | | "hwsensor-params-version" = <00000001>
    | | | | | "name" = <" = <">
    | | | | | "compatible" = <" = <00000094>
    | | | | | "#size-cells" = <00000000>
    | | | | | }
    | | | | |
    These PowerPC machines are amazing! Looks like there's fun to be had studying the IOKit framework. I'll post any findings.
    Cheers

  • Calling All NX6600GT-VTD128 AGP Users -- Post your temperature readings

    Hi to all MSI  NX6600GT-VTD128 AGP Users,
    I've recently purchased a  NX6600GT-VTD128 AGP card and have done some testing for a few days now. I read about the BIOS temperature modification and got it done with my card. To my surprise, the temperature reading is way above most of the temperature reading i see from you guys here. Here is my temperature reading :
    Idle : ~70C
    Load : ~90C
    so far, i've only seen 1 or 2 users with the same overheating problem and i couldn't figure out what is wrong with my card. i can run 3dmark, games and everything else i throw at it without any system instability, but the temperature reading is making me nervous. 90C at full load is way too high and not acceptable. i've changed the thermal compound to ArticSilver Ceramique, tighten the screws to make sure the GPU Core and the HSF are making good contact. In fact, i did all that twice to make sure i get everything right. Other components on the board, including the PCB are equaly hot during full load. In fact, during full load, the heat is so intense that i couldn't put my fingers on the PCB or the HSF for more than 1 sec without getting my fingers burnt.
    Problems i've given thoughts about are
    1. bad contact between the GPU core and the HSF
    2. faulty built-in temperature
    As for problem 1, like i've mentioned above, i've double checked and reapply ArticSilver on the GPU and RAM chips. Just to be sure, the HSF itself is really hot during full load and quite warm during idle (tested using my fingers . so that means the heat is being transfered to the HSF correctly. (correct me if i'm wrong). As for problem 2, i couldnt tell because i don't have any reference tempearture monitoring device to compare the readings.
    Im new to this card so i'm really hoping that more experience users will post something here, including your temperature reading for this card, to help me address this issue. If possible, I don't wish to change the onboard HSF. I'm using a 450Watt power supply. Please advice. thanks in advance.

    I have two AGP MSI 6600GT's.
    1) Idles 46, load around 62
    2) Idles 52, load around 68
    Both heatsinks were removed and Arctic Silver Ceramique added. Number 2 above is actually in a colder section of the house, yet has higher idle and load temp. I think the sensors are fairly accurate, but not if you have a faulty one which might be the case.
    I suggest you get one of these which I use with one of my 6600GT's. http://www.bestbyteinc.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SEN-CNU-001
    It's accurate to within 1C.  It is being used with card #1 above, at 46C idle the display is showing around 36 which makes perfect sense because the internal temperature can be higher by around 10-15C or even more.
    If you suspect bad contact with the heatsink. Turn the lights down low, and shine a flashlight at the edge of the card. Look at the space between the heatsink and the GPU from the opposite side of the flashlight. If it's not making good contact you should see light between the heatsink and GPU. Another thing you can try is take the heatsink off and clean off all the compound. Put a piece of newspaper between the GPU and heatsink with no thermal compound. See if you can pull out the newspaper with no resistance. If you can't it's making contact. Make sure to re-apply thermal compound before using the card.

  • What is the correct operating temperature range for the various iMac models?

    In our organization, we opperate approximately 20 mac systems (3-4 years old) with users performing a range of tasks using applications that range from 3D Design and graphics programs to MS Word and Outlook. There is concern that the systems (specifically iMacs) are running too hot and we've had a couple 'die'. Does anyone know of a list of acceptible opperating temperature ranges for Apple Computer systems? I am using a Mid-2010 3.2ghz Intel Core i3, with 8gb ddr3 and an ATI Radeon HD 5670 512mb graphics card, I have a 1 TB SATA that currently has 732GB's of free space. Below are my systems current temp readings using "Temperature Monitor" by Marcel Bresink.
    Has anyone else had issues with current Apple Computers overheating and dying?
    Thanks for your help, any input would be appreciated!

    The only items w/Temp ranges are the CPU cores. Your seetings look normal to me. These are mine:

  • Whats better for my mbp 2013 retina in the long run? Keep it plugged in as much as possible or letting the battery hit 10% and then recharge it?

    Whats better for my mbp 2013 retina in the long run? Keep it plugged in as much as possible or letting the battery hit 10% and then recharge it?

    Odd you ask that, since both are HORRIBLE,   ... especially often draining your battery low.
    General consideration of your MacBook battery
    Contrary to popular myths about notebook batteries, there is protection circuitry in your Macbook and therefore you cannot ‘overcharge’ your notebook when plugged in and already fully charged.
    However if you do not plan on using your notebook for several hours, turn it off (plugged in or otherwise), since you do not want your Macbook ‘both always plugged in and in sleep mode’.
    A lot of battery experts call the use of Lithium-Ion cells the "80% Rule", meaning use 80% of the full charge or so, then recharge them for longer overall life. The only quantified damage done in the use of Lithium Ion batteries are instances where the internal notebook battery is “often drained very low”, this is bad general use of your notebook battery.
    A person who has, for example, 300 charge cycles on their battery and is recharging at say 40% remaining of a 100% charge has a better battery condition state than, say, another person who has 300 charge cycles on their battery and is recharging at say 10-15% remaining on a 100% charge. DoD (depth of discharge) is much more important on the wear and tear on your Macbook’s battery than the count of charge cycles. There is no set “mile” or wear from a charge cycle in specific. Frequent high depth of discharge rates (draining the battery very low) on a Lithium battery will hasten the lowering of maximum battery capacity.
    All batteries in any device are a consumable meant to be replaced eventually after much time, even under perfect use conditions.
    If the massive amount of data that exists on lithium batteries were to be condensed into a simplex, helpful, and memorable bit of information it would be:
    1. While realistically a bit impractical during normal everyday use, a lithium battery's longevity and its chemistry's health is most happy swinging back and forth between 20% and 85% charge roughly.
    2. Do not purposefully drain your battery very low (10% and less), and do not keep them charged often or always high (100%).
    3. Lithium batteries do not like the following:
    A: Deep discharges, as meaning roughly 10% or less on a frequent basis.
    B: Rapid discharges as referring to energy intensive gaming on battery on a frequent basis (in which case while gaming, if possible, do same on power rather than battery). This is a minor consideration.
    C: Constant inflation, as meaning always or most often on charge, and certainly not both in sleep mode and on charge always or often.
    From Apple on batteries:
    http://www.apple.com/batteries/notebooks.html
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1446
    "Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time."
    Keep it plugged in when near a socket so you keep the charging cycles down on your LiPo (lithium polymer) cells / battery, but not plugged in all the time. When not being used for several hours, turn it off.
    DoD (depth of discharge) is far more important on the wear and tear on your Macbook battery than any mere charge cycle count.  *There is no set “mile” or wear from a charge cycle in general OR in specific.    As such, contrary to popular conception, counting cycles is not conclusive whatsoever, rather the amount of deep DoD on an averaged scale of its use and charging conditions.
                              (as a very rough analogy would be 20,000 hard miles put on a car vs. 80,000 good miles being something similar)
    *Contrary to some myths out there, there is protection circuitry in your Macbook and therefore you cannot overcharge it when plugged in and already fully charged
    *However if you don’t plan on using it for a few hours, turn it OFF (plugged in or otherwise) ..*You don’t want your Macbook both always plugged in AND in sleep mode       (When portable devices are charging and in the on or sleep position, the current that is drawn through the device is called the parasitic load and will alter the dynamics of charge cycle. Battery manufacturers advise against parasitic loading because it induces mini-cycles.)
    Keeping batteries connected to a charger ensures that periodic "top-ups" do very minor but continuous damage to individual cells, hence Apples recommendation above:   “Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time”, …this is because “Li-ion degrades fastest at high state-of-charge”.
                        This is also the same reason new Apple notebooks are packaged with 50% charges and not 100%.
    Contrary to what some might say, Lithium batteries have an "ideal" break in period. First ten cycles or so, don't discharge down past 40% of the battery's capacity. Same way you don’t take a new car out and speed and rev the engine hard first 100 or so miles.
    Proper treatment is still important. Just because LiPo batteries don’t need conditioning in general, does NOT mean they dont have an ideal use / recharge environment. Anything can be abused even if it doesn’t need conditioning.
    Storing your MacBook
    If you are going to store your MacBook away for an extended period of time, keep it in a cool location (room temperature roughly 22° C or about 72° F). Make certain you have at least a 50% charge on the internal battery of your Macbook if you plan on storing it away for a few months; recharge your battery to 50% or so every six months roughly if being stored away. If you live in a humid environment, keep your Macbook stored in its zippered case to prevent infiltration of humidity on the internals of your Macbook which could lead to corrosion.
    Considerations:
    Your battery is subject to chemical aging even if not in use. A Lithium battery is aging as soon as its made, regardless.
    In a perfect (although impractical) situation, your lithium battery is best idealized swinging back and forth between 20 and 85% SOC (state of charge) roughly.
    Further still how you discharge the battery is far more important than how it is either charged or stored short term, and more important long term that cycle counts.
    Ultimately counting charge cycles is of little importance.  Abuse in discharging (foremost), charging, and storing the battery and how it affects battery chemistry is important and not the ‘odometer’ reading, or cycle counts on the battery. 
    Everything boils down to battery chemistry long term, and not an arbitrary number, or cycle count.
    Keep your macbook plugged in when near a socket since in the near end of long-term life, this is beneficial to the battery.
    In a lithium battery, deep discharges alter the chemistry of the anode to take up lithium ions and slowly damages the batteries capacity for the cathode to transport lithium ions to the anode when charging, thereby reducing max charge levels in mAh. In short, radical swings of power to lithium cells disrupts the chemical ecosystem of the battery to hold charges correctly which likewise impedes the perfect transfer of lithium ions both in charging and discharging.  In charging your lithium battery, lithium ions are “pushed uphill” (hard) to the anode, and discharged “downhill” (easy) to the cathode when on battery power. Deep discharges, damages this “upward” electrolyte chemistry for the battery to maintain a healthy charge and discharge balance relative to its age and cycles.
    Optimally, in terms of a healthy lithium battery and its condition, it is most happy at 50% between extremes, which is why low-power-drain processors such as the Haswell are ideal on lithium battery health since a partially charged battery with a low-drain processor has, in general, much more usage in hours
    Battery calibration, battery memory, battery overcharging, battery training, …all these concepts are mostly holdovers from much older battery technology, and on older Apple portable Macbooks ranging from early nicads, NiMh and otherwise; and these practices do not apply to your lithium battery and its smart controllers.
    Calibrating the battery on older Apple portable Macbooks with removable batteries.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14087
    There is no calibration of current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1490
    There is no battery calibration with current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries. Lithium batteries have essentially a 0-‘memory’, and all such calibration involve the estimations fed to the system controller on the SOC (state of charge) of the battery over long periods of time as the battery degrades. The software based battery controller knows the battery's characteristics, or SOC and adjusts itself. This is why there is both no need and purpose to periodically deeply drain your macbook battery, since it doesn’t affect the characteristics of the battery, and further still deep discharges are something you should not do on purpose to any lithium battery.
    From BASF: How Lithium Batteries work
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PjyJhe7Q1g
    Peace

  • G41M-P25 / HW monitor F71889F - incorrect CPU temperature readings?

    My old mainboard blew up (literally, the capacitators leaked) and I had it replaced with a G41M-P25. The tech guy also put a new CPU cooler on the board because for whatever reason he decided that my old one wouldn´t fit. From then on my PC became extremely unstable, according to various monitor programs the CPU temperature was ca. 60°C in idle mode and went up to 85°C (!) within 2 minutes with full CPU load then the board would shut down.
    I went back to the store and complained and got a stronger cooler. The system runs stable now, but the CPU temperature readings are still quite high: ca. 50°C in idle, up to 68°C with full load. I double-checked the values in the BIOS monitor and it shows the same temperatures. But the heat sink is cool (way below body temperature) and when I touch the spot where it is sitting on the CPU it is cool, too.
    So... what are the chances that the HW monitor is reporting an incorrect CPU temperature? Is there any known issue with the mainboard G41M-P25 and the built in HW monitor Fintek F71889F? SpeedFan also reports quite high temperatures for "temp2" under full load (up to 80-90°C), which seems to be the mosfet temperature - but I know that SpeedFan is not completely to be trusted. I just worry about the CPU temperature, according to the Intel datasheet it should be ca. 63°C at most.
    My system:
    Mainboard MSI G41M-P25
    CPU Intel Pentium D 2.8GHz
    The Pentium D is known for getting hot fast, but on the other hand the cooler is already pretty strong and like I said a touch test revealed that the area near the CPU is way below body temperature, so nowhere near 68°C. In comparison the temperature reported for my graphics card is 50-60°C which seems to be correct because it actually is hot and the air surrounding it is warm, too. Should I just ignore the temperature readings? Or is this a problem which can possibly be fixed with a BIOS update? Or maybe complain again and have the mainboard replaced?

    Well, I used Speedfan. Problem is when under load temp2 hits about 80°C thermal throttling occurs which makes my processor useless for gaming. Because of that, I changed processor for my old P4 3,0GHz and OC'ed it a little (@3,27GHz). Temps are similiar, but lower than 80°C. Here is log from Speedfan after 2 mins CPU torture:
    Quote
    Seconds   GPU   CPU   Temp1   Temp2   Core
    61244   51,0   43,25   50,0   50,0   51,0
    61247   51,0   43,25   51,0   51,0   51,0
    61250   51,0   43,25   53,0   54,0   51,0
    61253   51,0   43,25   54,0   54,0   51,0
    61256   51,0   43,25   53,0   54,0   51,0
    61259   51,0   43,0   54,0   55,0   51,0
    61263   51,0   43,25   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61265   51,0   43,25   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61269   51,0   43,0   54,0   56,0   51,0
    61272   51,0   43,25   54,0   57,0   51,0
    61275   51,0   43,25   53,0   57,0   51,0
    61278   51,0   43,25   51,0   56,0   51,0
    61281   51,0   43,25   50,0   55,0   51,0
    61284   51,0   43,25   50,0   54,0   51,0
    61287   51,0   43,25   50,0   54,0   51,0
    61290   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61293   51,0   43,0   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61296   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61299   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61302   51,0   43,25   50,0   53,0   51,0
    61305   51,0   43,25   49,0   53,0   51,0
    61308   51,0   43,0   49,0   52,0   51,0
    61311   51,0   43,25   50,0   52,0   51,0
    61314   51,0   43,25   49,0   52,0   51,0
    61318   51,0   43,0   50,0   52,0   51,0
    61321   51,0   43,0   50,0   53,0   51,0
    61324   51,0   43,25   52,0   53,0   51,0
    61327   51,0   43,25   56,0   56,0   51,0
    61330   51,0   43,25   56,0   57,0   51,0
    61333   51,0   43,25   58,0   60,0   51,0
    61336   51,0   43,25   58,0   61,0   51,0
    61339   51,0   43,25   58,0   63,0   51,0
    61342   51,0   43,25   59,0   67,0   51,0
    61345   51,0   43,5   59,0   65,0   51,0
    61348   51,0   43,5   59,0   65,0   51,0
    61351   51,0   43,25   59,0   66,0   51,0
    61354   51,0   43,5   60,0   67,0   51,0
    61357   51,0   43,25   59,0   68,0   51,0
    61360   51,0   43,25   59,0   69,0   51,0
    61363   51,0   43,5   59,0   70,0   51,0
    61367   51,0   43,5   60,0   71,0   51,0
    61370   51,0   43,25   60,0   71,0   51,0
    61373   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61376   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61379   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61382   51,0   43,5   60,0   73,0   51,0
    61385   51,0   43,5   60,0   74,0   51,0
    61388   51,0   43,5   60,0   74,0   51,0
    61391   51,0   43,5   60,0   75,0   51,0
    61394   51,0   43,5   60,0   75,0   51,0
    61397   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61400   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61403   51,0   43,5   60,0   76,0   51,0
    61406   51,0   43,5   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61409   51,0   43,75   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61412   51,0   43,5   60,0   77,0   51,0
    61416   51,0   43,75   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61419   51,0   43,75   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61422   51,0   43,5   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61425   51,0   43,5   60,0   78,0   51,0
    61428   51,0   43,5   60,0   79,0   51,0
    61431   51,0   43,75   61,0   79,0   51,0
    61434   51,0   43,75   61,0   79,0   51,0
    61437   51,0   43,75   60,0   79,0   51,0
    61440   51,0   43,75   60,0   79,0   51,0
    Also, my CPU cooler is Scythe Katana III and it's installed properly.

  • Dodgy temperature readings

    Hello, I'm running a K8N Neo Platinum board with an Athlon 64 3200+.
    Using Bios revision 1.3 (the latest)
    I am very happy with everything except the temperature readings.  I was concerned to see that both core center and nvidia system utility reported that my CPU was idling around 60 C +.  I was highly suspicious about this as the heatsink was not very hot and the temp seemed to be the same whether I was playing Doom3 or it was totally idle.
    I am using the stock AMD heatsink and fan, I know I could shave a few degrees off the core temp by using arctic silver and a better heatsink but frankly I am not interested in overclocking and can't be bothered.  I have one PCI exhaust fan and the two fan PSU pulling air out the case and a standard 8cm case fan pulling air in.  System temperature varies from 35-40 C depending on room temp and pc activity.
    I have noticed a few times that core center suddenly starts to report the true (or what seems to be the true) temperature which is 40-45 C.  I have no idea what prompts it to work or not to work.  When the cpu temp is reported incorrectly it seems to also prevent cool n quiet from kicking in.  I’ve just noticed now that when my system was idling and the temp correctly reported that corecenter reported it had underclocked to 1 ghz - I've never seen it do this when the cpu temp is reported in the 60s.
    Is this fixable in future bios upgrade or do I have a dodgy temp sensor?

    Quote
    Originally posted by Kurgan666
    Quote
    Originally posted by tazman2
    Ambient temp is 77F (25C) and the CPU temp is 48C at idle. I have a fan blowing in by the harddrives and a fan blowing out in the back of the case plus the Enermax PSU with dual fan blowing out.  No more room to add any more fans.  The exhaust fan is blowing pretty good amount of warm air, no sure if the intake fan is blowing in enogh air though.  I put one with a thermal sensor and maybe it is not blowing enough.  
    I don't know waht else you can try, your set up sounds very similar to mine and my system temp under heavy load reaches only 45/7 and idles around 40/2.
    I just flashed to 1.45 and it seems like I am getting the low low temps again, we'll see if this lasts any longer than  1.44.
    I am going to replace the fron fan with a non thermally controlled fan and see if I can get more airflow (maybe the existing fan is running too slow).  Other than that I am not sure as to what to do.  Are your case fans thermally controlled or are they running at max speed all the time?  How about your CPU fan, is it setup for a particular temp in the BIOS or is it setup to run at max all the time?
    Thanks,

  • Temperature - BOINC - SETI@Home - MBP 17"

    Hello!
    Is 91 degrees Celsius a safe continuous temperature for the 2.5 GHz Core i7-2860QM CPU in my late 2011 Macbook Pro 17"? Will that continuous temperature reduce the life span of the CPU or logic board components?
    I would like to run SETI@Home / BOINC on my laptop for many hours at a time, and for many days in a row when the laptop isn't being used. BOINC by default uses 100% of the CPU in order to crunch science data. I can adjust the settings to cause BOINC to use less of the CPU, but I'm trying to not be over-reactive to temperature readings that may be perfectly safe, even for extended periods of time, and on a regular basis. Please note, the 91 degree temperature is with an external notebook cooling fan assisting in the cooling. The unassisted temperature would be much higher.
    I've also included the temperature readings from iStat Pro temperature monitoring application to diversify the data. Please note, the data listed in the categories "CPU A Temperature Diode" from "Hardware Monitor" and "CPU" from "iStat Pro" seems to be identical. The application "Temperature Monitor" gave me the same readings as "Hardware Monitor," and so is not listed.
    Temperatures with CPU at 100% Usage:
    Hardware Monitor:
    CPU A Temperature Diode     : 91 degrees Celsius
    CPU A Proximity                   : 81 degrees Celsius
    iStat Pro:
    CPU                                     : 91 degrees Celsius
    CPU Heatsink                       : 54 degrees Celsius
    Temperatures with CPU at 20% Usage:
    Hardware Monitor:
    CPU A Temperature Diode     : 71 degrees Celsius
    CPU A Proximity                   : 67 degrees Celsius
    iStat Pro:
    CPU                                     : 71 degrees Celsius
    CPU Heatsink                       : 52 degrees Celsius
    (Note: The BOINC application is likely also utilizing the computers Graphics Processing Unit, and adding to the CPU temperature readout as a result since both processing units are supposedly using the same heat pipes to stay cool).
    Any comments, suggestions, or questions to help produce an answer are welcome and much appreciated!

    I like your style .
    I, also, just installed boinc last night to help save the world with my computer while I sleep. I'm about to go do that right now-- yes it is 9 am here-- but I figured I'd make sure my computers don't melt before I do so.
    Right now my MacBookPro5,2 duder is running at 68° C according to smcFanControl-- it should be noted that I find the sound of the fans soothing- especially in this case because it reminds me that I'm helping compute data that will be used to understand global warming, explore the causes of protein malfunctions to prevent  diseases and generate models of cognitive processes. That should be someone's sales pitch. I have fans set to 6000rpm (the maximum safe fan speed from what I understand)
    Whatever.
    I'm tired.
    my BOINC settings are:
    -Computing allowed while computer is in use
    -Use gpu while computer is in use only after the computer has been idle for 3 minutes and only while processor usage is less than 30 percent.
    -Switch between Applications every 20 minutes
    -use at most 50% of CPU time**
    --Use at most 10 gigs of disk space
    --use at most 75% of page file (swap space)
    --Use at most 20% of memory when computer is in use
    --Use at most 75% of memory when computer is idle.
    --leave applications in memory while suspended.
    ---My energy saver prefs are set for better performance,
    ---the computer is set to go to sleep never
    ---display goes to sleep after 3 minutes
    ----In terminal I set my computer to go to sleep after 4 hours of processing:
    $ sudo shutdown -s +240
    I'll report back when I wake up and let you know if my computer burned my building down.
    I'm not too worried about it.
    Anyone else running boinc or something similar if you could please post your settings/stats/temperature results, it'd be much appreciated.
    and if you want to join us Captain Planet style, check out:
    boinc.berkeley.edu/
    http://mindmodeling.org/beta/
    http://docking.cis.udel.edu/
    http://climateprediction.net/
    http://boinc.fzk.de/poem/
    Those are just the projects i'm contributing to so far.

  • Upgraded 2012 MACBOOK PRO 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB an alternate for RETINA MBP 15 or NOT?How good is its potential, reliability ?

    I am a student and an aspiring filmmaker.I am also into digital cinematography (Canon 550D) and now will be venturing into editing. I am in DIRE NEED of help
    I have a few problems regarding the purchase of Macbook pro.I live in Kolkata(India).I have been waiting for the past 1 and a half years to buy a Mac but after the release of Retina Macbook pro 15.I am left confused. Its near unupgradability and unreparibility rumors, delayed delivery, and 1st generation hardware issues especially the lack of Optical drive made me reconsider my decision of buying one.
    I want to know whether I can go for the top model of Non Retina - 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB 1 GB Nvidea as an alternate choice for Retina MBP pro or NOT ?
    1.I wanted to buy the Retina Base model. Though it is very recently launched and there is a big risk buying it because they say it is unrepairable and unfixable as 'everything is glued into the motherboard' dialogue scares me. Something goes wrong after purchase and they send it back to US, is what the Apple officials said. Moreover they don’t keep one on a demo at Apple stores in kolkata. I have searched almost everywhere and have been to many resellers in my city but no use.
    NOW,I am very sceptical about custom ordering a Macbook 15 non retina with High-Res 1680X1050p from US.I don’t know how much custom duty or expenses I have to pay and is it safe or not. Time is also a factor. Sadly, I have to buy one in Kolkata (my city) it seems.
    2. I am opting for Macbook Pro 15,2.6 Ghz,8GB RAM. Buying it for the sole purpose of editing(audio, video, photos).I need something which is fast along with a good screen size. My original decision was to buy the 17inch but after the launch of Retina and the upgraded 15 inch, I am only looking forward to the upgraded models. Many say 13 inch is fast, but it features a dual core with a maximum of 2.9Ghz clockspeed. I on the other hand want a quad core i7 with good upgradability options and a good screen size. The 13 inch may be a favorite for many, but I want nothing less than a 15 inch. One good option I get with non Retina 15 is its upgradability, while many say Retina MBP 15 can be made upgradable in future but that time is yet to come and by the time the whole web becomes ‘retina friendly’ and all applications supporting its 2880X1800 resolution, I may end up waiting only. Yes the picture quality remains unbeatable when compared to Retina Pro and it will always be. Though friends, I am a student, I want something which is fast, can run almost anything and future dependable. Retina Mac book Pro in India is 2799 USD - Base model. I cannot pay that amount just for the screen. As far as speed is concerned, I plan to get an OWC SSD and a 16 GB OWC RAM in the future resulting in greater speed when comparing the configuration with Retina 15.That problem is solved.
    My problem here is this: The web is filled with reviews and videos of Retina Macbook Pro and the upgraded Macbook Pro 15 is just no where, if you even find a few videos, they only feature unboxing videos of Macbook pro 15 (i7-2.3Ghz-4GB-500GB-500MB Nvidea).Other videos compare the 2.3ghz model with Retina 15 pro. They are not elaborate like the 15 Retina Pro reviews.
    1. I want to know about the real performance, potential, pros, cons of Macbook Pro 15 (i7 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB 1GB Nvidea graphics).
    So my question to you is what is your opinion on the 15 inch non retina ? HOW FAST do you think is the new upgraded 15inch non retina i7-2.6Ghz-8GB-750GB model really is ?I have read on many mac forums and seen on a particular youtube video that 15inch 2.3Ghz model takes an alarming 40 seconds to start because of traditional hard drive ! A normal DELL Inspiron starts at 15 secs max with i3+4 GB RAM and this particularly confuses me about the whole quad core processing and stuff and speed when running applications like C6,FCP,Lightroom etc is to be determined in regard to the model I want to buy.
    2. Is it necessary to buy APPLE CARE WARRANTY when buying a laptop from Apple.What are the benefits and how is it different form the normal customer care ?
    3. Please enlighten me on some nice headphones from Sennheizer under 90 USD.I am considering Sennheiser HD 439.I am not a bass freak and I want something to use for listening to voice, loud clear. In short, a headphone for all purpose. I heard the HD 449 is not that good compared to HD 439.They say it is Jazz oriented. Another confusion  !
    Finally, If you know anyone who knows about this configuration (15inch 2.6 8GB RAM 750GB) and its performance than please help me out my friends. Any small detail, input, you feel like please let me know. Please help me be sure and satisfied am buying my Macbook Pro very soon and I am awaiting your response.

    Well, are you talking about a 750 Hard Drive or SSD?  If SSD (quite expensive) it will certainly be as fast.  One option is to get the smallest HD they have and with the Non Retina you can upgrade the HD to an SSD later or now but save a little money.  Check with iFixit or OWC for instructions.  HD's do take longer to start up and load, but once open, the processor and video work just the same as on the Retina model.  The SSD speed is nice, but really not critical.  So you have to wait a minute for your computer to boot up.  The other big question is you need to find out if the non-retina model will take 16GB of ram.  According to OWC's site, it will, 16GB for 150USD.  Once you get programs open and resident in ram, everything will fly.

  • MACBOOK PRO 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB(Upgraded MBP 2012) an alternate for RETINA MBP 15 or NOT?How good is its potential, reliability ?

    I am a student and an aspiring filmmaker.I am also into digital cinematography (Canon 550D) and now will be venturing into editing. I am in DIRE NEED of help
    I have a few problems regarding the purchase of Macbook pro.I live in Kolkata(India).I have been waiting for the past 1 and a half years to buy a Mac but after the release of Retina Macbook pro 15.I am left confused. Its near unupgradability and unreparibility rumors, delayed delivery, and 1st generation hardware issues especially the lack of Optical drive made me reconsider my decision of buying one.
    I want to know whether I can go for the top model of Non Retina - 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB 1 GB Nvidea as an alternate choice for Retina MBP pro or NOT ?
    I wanted to buy the Retina Base model. Though it is very recently launched and there is a big risk buying it because they say it is unrepairable and unfixable as 'everything is glued into the motherboard' dialogue scares me. Something goes wrong after purchase and they send it back to US, is what the Apple officials said. Moreover they don’t keep one on a demo at Apple stores in kolkata. I have searched almost everywhere and have been to many resellers in my city but no use.
    NOW,I am very sceptical about custom ordering a Macbook 15 non retina with High-Res 1680X1050p from US.I don’t know how much custom duty or expenses I have to pay and is it safe or not. Time is also a factor. Sadly, I have to buy one in Kolkata (my city) it seems.
    I am opting for Macbook Pro 15,2.6 Ghz,8GB RAM. Buying it for the sole purpose of editing(audio, video, photos).I need something which is fast along with a good screen size. My original decision was to buy the 17inch but after the launch of Retina and the upgraded 15 inch, I am only looking forward to the upgraded models. Many say 13 inch is fast, but it features a dual core with a maximum of 2.9Ghz clockspeed. I on the other hand want a quad core i7 with good upgradability options and a good screen size. The 13 inch may be a favorite for many, but I want nothing less than a 15 inch. One good option I get with non Retina 15 is its upgradability, while many say Retina MBP 15 can be made upgradable in future but that time is yet to come and by the time the whole web becomes ‘retina friendly’ and all applications supporting its 2880X1800 resolution, I may end up waiting only. Yes the picture quality remains unbeatable when compared to Retina Pro and it will always be. Though friends, I am a student, I want something which is fast, can run almost anything and future dependable. Retina Mac book Pro in India is 2799 USD - Base model. I cannot pay that amount just for the screen. As far as speed is concerned, I plan to get an OWC SSD and a 16 GB OWC RAM in the future resulting in greater speed when comparing the configuration with Retina 15.That problem is solved.
    My problem here is this: The web is filled with reviews and videos of Retina Macbook Pro and the upgraded Macbook Pro 15 is just no where, if you even find a few videos, they only feature unboxing videos of Macbook pro 15 (i7-2.3Ghz-4GB-500GB-500MB Nvidea).Other videos compare the 2.3ghz model with Retina 15 pro. They are not elaborate like the 15 Retina Pro reviews.
    I want to know about the real performance, potential, pros, cons of Macbook Pro 15 (i7 2.6Ghz 8GB RAM 750 GB 1GB Nvidea graphics).
    So my question to you is what is your opinion on the 15 inch non retina ? HOW FAST do you think is the new upgraded 15inch non retina i7-2.6Ghz-8GB-750GB model really is ?I have read on many mac forums and seen on a particular youtube video that 15inch 2.3Ghz model takes an alarming 40 seconds to start because of traditional hard drive ! A normal DELL Inspiron starts at 15 secs max with i3+4 GB RAM and this particularly confuses me about the whole quad core processing and stuff and speed when running applications like C6,FCP,Lightroom etc is to be determined in regard to the model I want to buy.
    A. Is it necessary to buy APPLE CARE WARRANTY when buying a laptop from Apple. What are the benefits and how is it different form the normal customer care ?
    B. Please enlighten me on some nice headphones from Sennheizer under 90 USD.I am considering Sennheiser HD 439.I am not a bass freak and I want something to use for listening to voice, loud clear. In short, a headphone for all purpose. I heard the HD 449 is not that good compared to HD 439.They say it is Jazz oriented. Another confusion  !
    Finally, If you know anyone who knows about this configuration (15inch 2.6 8GB RAM 750GB) and its performance than please help me out my friends. Any small detail, input, you feel like please let me know. Please help me be sure and satisfied am buying my Macbook Pro very soon and I am awaiting your response.

    Well, are you talking about a 750 Hard Drive or SSD?  If SSD (quite expensive) it will certainly be as fast.  One option is to get the smallest HD they have and with the Non Retina you can upgrade the HD to an SSD later or now but save a little money.  Check with iFixit or OWC for instructions.  HD's do take longer to start up and load, but once open, the processor and video work just the same as on the Retina model.  The SSD speed is nice, but really not critical.  So you have to wait a minute for your computer to boot up.  The other big question is you need to find out if the non-retina model will take 16GB of ram.  According to OWC's site, it will, 16GB for 150USD.  Once you get programs open and resident in ram, everything will fly.

  • This is a workaround for the MBP wireless issue

    There have been many topics on the MBP wireless issues already, but I thought some people might find this workaround helpful.
    Firstly, my system is a 2.2Ghz MBP, running 10.4.10, and also airport extreme update 2007-04. I am using an airport express base station. My previous Powerbook never had any wireless problems, so I really couldn't blame the basestation for the MBPs poor wireless.
    Warning - The workaround requires a little bit of work in the terminal. A little bit of understanding of how networks work is assumed here as well. So it is probably not for everyone ...
    What I have observed - whenever the MBP loses connection, the airport basestation IP and MAC addresses are missing from the ARP table.
    - To view the ARP table, type (in a terminal window) arp -a.
    So, when the MBP wireless hangs, open up the terminal and type that in.
    Do a Cntrl-C if the arp command is hanging and not returning anything.
    In normal situations, a list of IP addresses and MAC addresses will show up.
    As others have already noted, clicking on the airport icon in the menubar, will magically bring the wireless back to life. When this happens, the ARP table also gets magically populated correctly. Coincidence? I think not!
    So, the workaround is to store a PERMANENT entry in the ARP table for the airport basestation IP and MAC address. In my case, I can use the Airport Utility software to confirm what the basestation IP and MAC addresses are (note MAC address = Airport ID in Airport Utility). I found the basestation IP=10.0.1.1 and the MAC=0:11:24:07:d7:f
    To create a permanent ARP table entry for my airport basestation, I opened up a terminal window, and did the following -
    1) login to my administrator account
    2) type in the following command sudo arp -s 10.0.1.1 0:11:24:7:d7:f
    3) type in my administrator password to authorise the change
    4) type in (to confirm the changes have been made) arp -a
    5) logout of my administrator account (from the terminal)
    Ever since I did this, my MBP wireless performance has been flawless.
    Note, if you shutdown or restart your computer, the arp entry disappears. This is ok for me as I hardly ever power down my MBP. As insurance I have added an account startup item to remind me to do the arp table entry.
    This workaround is great for me because I don't have a need to use multiple wireless networks. It might not be practical for people who roam around onto different networks.
    Give it a go and see if it works for you.
    Message was edited by: michael louey

    OK, after some further experimenting, I changed the multicast rate on my airport express. It was set at 6Mbps, and I changed it to 2Mbps.
    I have read that the default multicast rate for previous 802.11g versions of Airport basestations is actually 2mbps. Excellent results so far !! I have set up a terminal command to continuously ping my airport router address every 15 sec, and there have been virtually no dropped packets so far over many hours.
    ping -i 15 10.0.1.1
    Interestingly, in Apple's Airport Admin software in my MBP there is no option to set the rate at less than 6Mbps (!!!!), so I had to use the Windows XP version of Airport admin software to make this change using a windows machine. Using the XP software you can set the muticast rate as low as 1Mbps.
    If you are using Apples airport admin software (Tiger and Leopard) and you commit any sort of change in settings, the multicast rate will be re-set at a minimum of 6Mbps. My understanding of the multicast rate is that setting it too high is similar to shrinking the coverage area of the basestation, and limiting access only to clients who can transmit at the required multicast rate.
    So my new theory is that the dropouts are caused by the MBP dropping off the airport due to not being able to achieve the set multicast rate. (this could be due to factors such as low signal strength, excessive interference or noise).
    If you are using Apples more recent Airport admin software, you are having a minimum 6mbps muticast rate set, and this might be too high for your particular environment.
    Just a theory.
    (oh yeah, I enabled interference robustness on the MBP and the basestation just for good measure)

  • How do I format and external hard drive for my MBP?

    I have an external hard drive that I was using on a windows based system. I backed up the contents to dvd's and now I want to format the drive for my MBP? Can someone please tell me the best way to do this?
    Thanks.

    All you need to do is…
    1) Connect the drive
    2) Launch Disk Utility
    3) Select the drive and go to the partition tab
    4) Click on Options… and chenge it from MBR to GUID Partition Table
    5) Create a partition using MacOS Journalled
    6) Apply the change and you should have a Mac drive

  • What DVI connector do I need for a MBP

    what type of DVI connector do I need to get for my MBP to connect to a standard LCD projector

    From the Apple Store: Mini DisplayPort to VGA Adapter

  • IBook user - should I go for the mbp?

    Ok, I have a 12inch iBook G4 800mhz, 640mb ram. Before people start badmouthing my little baby you sould all know this was my first mac and it was this that made me see the light
    Ok so you know my setup. I am at college studying multimedia. For this I use apps such as photoshop, dreamweaver, illustrator and I am starting video next year and would obviosuly be using a video app such as Final Cut. I am only in my first year so its nothing too heavey, but at the same time my iBook is really starting to show its age and next year I have no doubts it will not be able to keep up.
    What would you guys recommend? Taking the plunge and getting the Macbook Pro or possibly wait and see what the Macbook has to offer? Im really tempted to go for the pro as it would surely last longer with it being a pro machine. The powerbook 15inch is still an option but once again if im going to fork out £1500 on a laptop on a students budget I want it to last. Does the MBP seem the right choice, or maybe a bit over specced for what I am doing and the MB (when announced) may look a better deal.
    Thanks in advance for your comments.

    well thats the thing really, money. I am in the market for a new laptop and either way (MB or MBP) I will most probably have to pay through finanicing. If I am to do this over a 2-3 year period it would surely make more sense to go for the mbp right? Am I correct in thinking a pro machine should have a longer lifespan?
    I could probably save up and buy a MB (supposing they keep the current ibook prices) but having just passed my driving test and paying for insurance on a car I think financing is the way to go.

Maybe you are looking for