Terminal Server Farm balancing with down server

I have an 11501 that is balancing connections between my 10 terminal servers.
We are using roundrobin because we were told by TAC that leastconn and ACA do not work well with terminal server environment.
The problem is that whenever a server goes down and comes back up that server is not first inline for people reconnecting. I need help finding a way, once the down server comes back online, to make this server have a higher weight until its connections are about equal to what the other server loads are.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
in my pinion balance leastconn should the job as it only counts the number of connections see :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008029c621.html#wp1038118:
balance leastconn - Least connection algorithm. This balance method chooses a running service that has the fewest number of connections.
We do not recommend that you use UDP content rules with the balance leastconn load-balancing algorithm. The service connection counters do not increment and remain at 0 because UDP is a connectionless protocol. Because the counters remain at 0, the CSS will give inconsistent results.
So if your terminal service is a running via UDP you are having a problem but in any other case it should do the job from the description given above.
The balance aca will fail due to the fact that the first and keepalive is very fast and so it can not determin the real load what you already found out.
Which method did you use balance aca or balance leastconn?
Cheers,
Joerg

Similar Messages

  • Disappearing disk space Windows Server 2012 R2 with SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise

    I've got an interesting problem with a virtual machine in our VMWare environment.  It is Windows Server 2012 R2 with SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise installed.  I started out with a 60GB disk and it started running out of space, so I increased
    it in VMWare and extended the partition to 100GB.  Well, that lasted for a bit and so I extended it again.  I've done this 3 or 4 times and now I've got a 160GB disk with about 2-3GB of space remaining (and it started with 10GB remaining). 
    WinDirStat shows 105GB of <Unknown> space being used, which is probably my issue.  However, I can't determine what this is and it keeps growing like a tapeworm.  The context menu on the <Unknown> files has all the options disabled,
    so WinDirStat doesn't appear to have access to whatever the file(s) is/are.  I've performed several chkdsk /f on the C: drive and nothing bad is reported.  I don't have any restore points and am not running VSS (that I'm aware of).  The pagefile
    reports as being about 4.9GB, so that's not the issue.  No large files are shown anywhere and my explorer settings are set to show me all files, including system files.
    When I try to run WinDirStat with elevated permissions, it hangs and becomes unresponsive. 
    I've even resorted to running CCleaner to see if it found anything, but it simply found the standard temp files and such...about 1GB. 
    I'm pulling my hair out...and I don't have much to start with.  Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks
    Russ

    It appears that somehow, Microsoft Fusion Assembly binding logging was turned on and many of the temp folders located at c:\users\username\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\InetCache\IE were filling up with hundreds of thousands of Fusion HTM log files. 
    This is controlled by an entry in the registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\ForceLog which was set to 1.  Hopefully, setting it back to zero will fix the issue.  As a result of figuring this out, I have recovered almost 80GB of disk
    space occupied by the log files.
    I thought WinDirStat would show me what I needed to know, but it turns out TreeSize (which I've used in the past) works much better.
    Russ

  • Proxy Server 3.6 with Identity Server 5.1!

    Hi All,
    I'm doing a Proof of Concept on integrating Identity Server 5.1 with proxy server 3.6. The proxy server is configured as a reverse proxy for another web server (since the web server is not supported by agent pack).
    I've configured the reverse proxy and add the agent to the proxy. However, each time after auth. in the Identity server and return back to the reverse proxy, it'll go to http://rproxy.domain.com/.domain.com not http://rproxy.domain.com.
    Moreover, even the user session is invalid, the user can go to the reverse proxy without re-auth even I've disable all the cache in the proxy server.
    Is it possible to use reverse proxy with identity server? If yes, how to config?
    Thanks
    Clive Chan

    Hi Clive Chan,
    i am also have the same problem, can you tell me which patch have you add to solve the problem?
    Thanks a lot!
    Angus

  • Can a real Server be applied in two different server farms associated with two different VIP IP and TCP Port

    Good day everyone,
    I have a question in regard to real server operation with different server farms, and VIPs
    Can a Real Server be associated ( for simpliciy) with two different Server Farms that have a VIP associated with each, servicing the same TCP Port (443).
    Example:
    SF-A
    RSRV-1: 192.168.1.10 /24
    RSRV-2: 192.168.1.11 /24
    VIP-A: 192.168.1.20 /24
    VIP-A: https:web-A
    Protocol: HTTPS
    SF-B
    RSRV-2: 192.168.1.11 /24
    RSRV-3: 192.168.1.12 /24
    VIP-B: 192.168.1.30 /24
    VIP-b: https:web-B
    Protocol: HTTPS
    Client-A: 172.16.128.10
    Client-B: 172.16.128.15
    I have attached an sketch depicting the connectivity.
    As always any feedback/Suggestions will be greatly apprecaited.
    Cheers,
    Raman Azizian

    Raman,
    This type of config is no problem. What the server is doing is virtual web hosting. The server would have two different web services running for the same IP, but each listening for a unique host header.
    From an IP point of view both connections would be destined to the rserver address on port 80, but in the http header they would have two different Host headers.
    one for www.example1.com and the second for www.example2.com. If the web server is configured correct so each host name is tied to one web service it will not have any issues.
    The config you attached looks ok. The way you have the sticky group is ok doing source IP. If you use cookies for the sticky group I would suggest you create two sticky groups each with a different cookie name and add the same serverfarm to both groups. The client will only send a cookie for the domain it received it from so using the same cookie in two vips could cause problems if the same client hits both vips.
    Hope that helps
    Regards
    Jim

  • T3 Load Balancing with Weblogic Server 6.1

    We are using rwo weblogic 6.1 servers A and B behind a load balancer with a DNS name (eg. www.loadbalancer.com). We are using T3 for Java client to application server communication. The client creates the Initial context with the load balancer url,creates remote objects using the context, closes the initial context and then tries to get a new initial Context. What we noticed is even though the client closes the first context and gets a new one, the client is always hooked on to only one server making load balancing ineffective. Is there a T3 configuration to release the connection when we close the context ? The documentation says only one T3 is established per client JVM.

    Rick,
    You may want to look at the Alteon and F5 configuration we have on edocs.
    Take a look at the following URLs for a possible solution
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/alteon.html#591902
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/bigip.html#591902
    Chuck Nelson
    DRE
    BEA Technical Support

  • Windows Server 2012 R2 with Exchange Server 2013 SP1 Completely fresh install giving errors signing into EAC

    Hi,
    I am struggling with a completely clean installation of Server 2012 R2 and Exchange 2013 SP1.  I followed these steps:
    Installed Server OS
    Windows Updates
    Added Active Directory Role (This is a single standalone server that would have been SBS until it was dropped)
    Added DHCP & DNS
    Added Certificate Services
    Added Windows Server Update Services (WID Database & WSUS Services)
    Windows Updates
    Added Media Foundation
    Added File Server Resource Manager and Work Folders
    Added Windows Server Backup
    Windows Updates
    Checked all running without errors in Server Manager and performed a full bare bones backup.
    Ran Setup.exe from Exchange 2013 SP1 disc.
    Installed Pre-requisites and then rebooted
    Windows Updates
    Ran Setup.exe from Exchange 2013 SP1 disc.
    Installation completed without errors
    Rebooted
    Checked all running without errors in Server Manager.
    I Launch Exchange Administrative Center and get "problem with website's server certificate error" (normal on machine with self-assigned certificates).  Click Continue to Website and get:
    Windows Security dialog box:
    iexplore - "The server localhost is asking for your username and password.  The server reports that it is from Digest"
    however no username and password combination will work:  have tried [Administrator]; [Domain\Administrator] even created a user to no avail.
    I believe the issue is somewhere in the IIS configuration because I also get the same error when trying to log into the server website from either the server or another machine on the network.
    I have tried the complete installation three times now:  (full disclosure not all of the same features/roles each time).  On the first attempt I got this error immediately and on try number 2 was able to get into the EAC and created the mailboxes
    but then it started giving the same error.  The above steps are try number 3.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance.
    Andy Halford
    P.S. A Follow up which might be significant:  The Default Web Site is not running and will not start (it was previously running before the Exchange installation) and when I try I get the message that Another Website may be using the same port however none
    of the others (Exchange Back End or WSUS Administration) are using ports 80 or 443 and I still get the error when they are both stopped.

    Could you post the list of sites:
    appcmd list site
    The ones listening on port 80:
    appcmd list site /bindings:http/*:80:
    And on port 443:
    appcmd list site /bindings:https/*:443:
    Step by Step Screencasts and Video Tutorials

  • SQL Server 2005 replaced with SQL Server 2014 trying to connect front end Access as guest (read only ODBC)

    We have replaced a SQL Server 2005 with a SQL Server 2014 (new physical server.)  Have the new server set up to use SQL Server login OR Windows user login. Had old server connecting (for a particular DB) to front end Access (2010 or 2013) as guest for
    anyone logged into the Windows NT Network with a read only ODBC connection. Have the DB in the new server set to include guest as db_datareader (with only SELECT permission for the securables of each table and view being linked) but when any Windows user not
    specifically listed as a SQL DB user tries to use the front end they get an error of:
    Microsoft SQL Server Login
    Connection failed:
    SQL State: '28000'
    SQL Server Error: 18456
    [Microsoft][OCBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] Login failed for user {domain\user}.
    After closing that pop-up window a server login window appears. Of course, since the guest user is not specifically listed as a user in the DB that fails also. It seems like there should be a very simple solution to this, but I can't seem to find it. I want
    to allow anyone logged in on the Windows system (locally) to be able to open the MS Access file (on their work station machine) and run their own (read only; select) queries on the SQL Server database. Any suggestions?
    Thanks a billion in advance ----

    Thanks for the response Olaf. I have now spent weeks researching this. I realize that using the guest account in most situations is not advised. As mentioned, I have restricted the guest account to allow the db_datareader role only, and have explicitly denied
    all other roles, as well as allowing select only, and still have no access for the guest account.
    The suggested fix in the second link you provided, of using Windows groups is not plausible for my situation either. We are a scientific field research institution, with a few long term users and lots of users that may have Windows accounts for a few months,
    and then they are gone. It would be a nightmare for the network tech to try to keep a group account up to date, and we need to give access (read only, of course) to anyone logged into the system. Realize that the ONLY access of any kind to this database is
    thru MS Access ACCDB, using a (by default) read only OCDB connection.
    This type of access is used particularly because researchers need to be able to set up their own queries, and the MS Access query interface is particularly convenient for people who are not themselves SQL experts, yet are trying to get some very advanced
    levels of output. Putting the database online is not practical because then we are back to the need for a comprehensive query interface, and just picking up general subsets of the data online (from a basic web page search feature) would be out of the question,
    since the result set would involve hundreds of thousands if not millions of records.
    So - that said - what exactly would you suggest, assuming we don't have the funds to buy a whole new system, and have spent plenty of money with Microsoft's Enterprise level MS Office so that all work stations have MS Access, and Microsoft's SQL Server,
    as well as running our network on Microsoft's network software.

  • Problems getting Web server to connect with LDAP server.

    Have 4.1.8 iplanet Web and 4.13 LDAP running on Win2000 sp2. Both are working fine separately, i.e. 'have good anonymous LDAP://URL responses, and 'have working application CGI responses from web server. 'Have previously had same setup running on another server. However, with this install on win2000 cannot get Global settings LDAP feature to work ~ getting " An error occured while contacting th LDAP server. A connection to the the directory server could not be opened. Have checked DNS settings, etc. All seems to be in order. Any suggetions?

    Hi,
    What edition of Win 2K are you using (Pro/Server/Ad Server). The problem could be your DNS settings only.Ensure which machine is your DNS Server is running,is it on NT? if so change it to win 2K server.
    Delete your LDAP machines A record from DNS server and add it again. This will solve your problem.
    Refer the URL :
    http://knowledgebase.iplanet.com/ikb/kb/articles/5135.html

  • RH Server 9 compatibility with Windows Server 2008 SP2/SQL Server

    Our tech support people are preparing for a first install of RH Server 9. They have asked me to find out whether there is a recent patch that would enable it to work with Windows Server 2008 SP2 64 bit and MS SQL Server 2008.
    If there is not yet a patch, will there be one for this OS/DB combination in the future, and when?
    This is in reference to the knowledgebase article at http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/884/cpsid_88483.html which gives a "not recommended" status to this combination.
    Our infrastructure team would prefer to use this combination if it is possible.
    Second question from the tech team: Do we need to separate the RoboHelp application from the database or can they both reside on the same server?

    To answer your first question, no there is no patch to allow SQL Server 2008 to run on a 64 bit server. To answer your second question, I don't know. This is a user to user forum and therefore we are not party to any discussions on when or if a patch will be released. You could sumbit a feature request which the Adobe RoboHelp Product Manager will get. This will help advance your case. You can submit it here:
    http://www.Adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&product=38
      The RoboColum(n)
      @robocolumn
      Colum McAndrew

  • Sun Portal Server 6 compatibility with Web Server 6.1 SP - 8

    Hi,
    Our client is running on Sun One Portal Server Version 6.0, which is deployed on Sun One Web Server ver 6.0, there is a request from the hosting provider to upgrade the web container to Web Server 6.1 SP8. My question is � Is Sun One Portal 6.0 (with AM 5.1 and DS 5.1 SP4) capable of / compatible with Web Server 6.1 SP - 8 ?
    Do you see any issues with going ahead with the upgrade?
    Thanks much for all your responses!

    We upgraded our Sun Webserver to SP8 and had no issues. We are running
    - Portal 6.2
    - IS 6.1
    - DS 5.1

  • Replicate win server 2008 r2 with win server 2012 r2

    I have AD on win server 2008 R2
    Can I replicate it with win server 2012 R2
    Nagy Anwar

    Hello,
    there is no problem to add a new Windows Server 2012 R2 into the existing domain.
    http://blogs.msmvps.com/mweber/2012/07/27/upgrading-an-active-directory-domain-from-windows-server-2008-or-windows-server-2008-r2-to-windows-server-2012/
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • Gateway server cant comunicate with managemant server

    Hi all,
    I have some issues with a gateway server. So I've installed the new server following Microsoft documentation. I've add the new server in OP console, I can see him but is unmonitored. I've installed same certificate on both servers in Trusted store (computer).
    ON GW I've check and 5723 it's opened. On GW I have this errors:
    EV 20057, OpsMgr Connector
    Failed to initialize security context for target MSOMHSvc/computer The error returned is 0x80090303(The specified target is unknown or unreachable).  This error can apply to either the Kerberos or the SChannel package.
    EV 20057, OpsMgr Connector
    Failed to initialize security context for target MSOMHSvc/computer The error returned is 0x80090303(The specified target is unknown or unreachable).  This error can apply to either the Kerberos or the SChannel package.
    EV 21001, OpsMgr Connector
    The OpsMgr Connector could not connect to MSOMHSvc/copscomsvr01.corp.local because mutual authentication failed.  Verify the SPN is properly registered on the server and that, if the server is in a separate domain, there is a full-trust relationship
    between the two domains.
    EV 20071, OpsMgr Connector
    The OpsMgr Connector connected to copscomsvr01.corp.local, but the connection was closed immediately without authentication taking place.  The most likely cause of this error is a failure to authenticate either this agent or the server .  Check
    the event log on the server and on the agent for events which indicate a failure to authenticate.
    Any ideas?

    Hi,
    Please check the registry. Go to the OPS reg hive and check if the FQDN name is supplied for the Networkname and AuthenticationName. If this doesn’t match your certificate common name you will get the 20071 event.
    Just change it and restart the OpsMgr service.
    More details:
    https://michelkamp.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/solving-the-gateway-20071-event/
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Does 9i App Server come Bundled with Database Server

    I just want to know if 9i App server comes bundled with any Database Server.
    Thanks
    null

    no, it doen't.

  • Can I install Portal server 6.1 with Directory server 5.2

    Hi,
    Can I install Sun ONE Portal Server 6.1 with Sun ONE Directory Server 5.2 that is an existing installation? I have checked iPS 6.1 installation guide that mentioned iDS version should be 5.1.
    Thanks a lot,
    Yu Mao

    Identity server 6.0 SPx has not been certified/tested on DS 5.2.
    IS 6.1 will support DS 5.2.

  • Issue while installing Ms Project Server 2013 on MS Server 2012 R2 with Sharepoint Server 2013

    Hello MS Support Team,
    I installed SQL server 2012 & Sharepoint server 2013 and after that the MS project Server 2013 is not installing on the same server -- pls hv a look the enclosed screenshot. sent at [email protected] and guide me to resolve it on priority.
    A windows poped up - Installation Error - This Project requires MS Sharepont Enterprise edition... (Which is not available on the MSDN Server)..only standard edition available.
    Please reply asap @ [email protected] - Call @ 0120471384
    Kind Regards,
    Vinay Bhardwaj
    Network System Administrator - GREC (IN)
    Rockwell Automation | A-66, Sector 64 | Noida | India
    LISTEN. THINK. SOLVE
    IP : 71384 | E : [email protected] | W : www.rockwellautomation.com

    Hi Siriosus,
    Indeed you do need Sharepoint Server 2013
    Enterprise for Project Server 2013.
    See article below where it is mentionned:
    Project Server 2013 requires the Enterprise edition of SharePoint Server 2013. Prior versions of SharePoint Server and SharePoint Foundation 2013 are not supported.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee662114(v=office.15).aspx
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error message in BPEL console when purging instances

    Hi I get an error message in the BPEL console when I Purge All Instances. The problem arised when i patched SOA suite to version 10.1.3.3. (On 10.1.3.1 i beleive this worked.) ====================================== Exception Operation failed because:

  • Exporting a table to an EPUB (a beginners question)

    Epub beginner. I trying to teach my self how to create an EPUB, I have watched many tutorials from Adobe and beyond all very useful and educational. I am using Indesign CS5.5 Question 1: What is the best way to export a 'table' to an EPUB doc' that h

  • Pages '09 Document won't open - file missing

    Hi all, I recently upgraded to Pages '09, and have created my first document it in, a four page newsletter. I attempted to open it this evening, and am getting an error message that says "Newsletter Name" couldn't be opened, the required index.xml fi

  • Display results as String: dosen't work based on the example

    Hello, To understand how to display results as string, I tried to reproduce this: [http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:84|http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:84] I have my table emp EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO 7839  KING PR

  • Purchase invoicing plan - good entry

    Dear all, I have implemented the invoice plan in purchase order following SAP library ([SAP Link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/ea/6e1b769e0111d1a39b0000e8a522f1/frameset.htm]) but SAP Library tells do NOT insert the "good receipt" flag