Terms of Payment Key in line item with Special G/L Indicator

Hi All,
Displaying the line item of a financial document with Special G/L Indicator,
I can't see the Terms of Payment Key (BSEG-ZTERM).
Could anyone tell me how to make it shown?
Thanks
G.

Hi:
BSEG-ZTERM is not contained by SAP standard dynpro:SAPMF05A 304 and hence it is not possible to display payment term in down payments with special GLs indicator, The reason being that the terms of payment not only control the due date but
also the cash discount terms. Hence it is not feasible to display terms of payment in Down payments. DP forms part of balance sheet and hence it is not system design to display payment terms with special GL indicator, Hope it will help you.
Regards

Similar Messages

Clearing customer Items with Special G/L Indicator 'A' (down payment)

Hi All,
I've to clear two items of a customer by t.code F-32:
Both items, that I dysplays by t.code FBL5N (u20AC 20.000,00 and - 20.000,00), are with Special G/L Indicator 'A' (down payment).
Only the first one contains a 'tax amount' equal to 4.000,00.
When I process the open Items of the customer by t.code F-32, I expect to see the two items as follows
20.000,00
- 20.000,00
Instead, SAP displays as follows
24.000,00
- 20.000,00
So, I can't clear them as 24.000,00 is not equal to 20.000,00
Could anyone tell me ho to solve?
Thanks

Hi Maurizio,
first of all, thanks for your answer.
I've checked the tax category in the G/L account master data of the special G/L
account used for down payments (A). Tax category is equal to '+ '.
According to this setting, I posted a customer credit memo as follow:
Item 01; posting key 11; Customer account XXX; Amount 24.000,00
Item 02; posting key 09; Customer account XXX; Special G/L Indicator A; Amount 20.000,00 (tax code 20%)
Item 03; posting key 40; Debit tax account; Amount 20.000,00 (tax code 20%)
Now I've to clear the item 02 of that credit memo. When I try to do it by t.code F-32, SAP displays the amount 24.000,00 (with tax amount) and not 20.000,00.
Clearing that item, the system create a automatic posting for tax account of 4000,00.
This is my issue: SAP shouldn't create this posting for tax account.
Thank again.
G.

IDocs for items posted with special G/L indicator

Hi all!
Is it true that the idoc types for open items (acc_billing, acc_invoice_receipt) are not able to post items with special G/L indicator.
Does this mean that i have to implement a program of my own which builds up a FIDCCP02 idoc to post open items from a legacy system for migration??
Thanks for your advice.
Axel

Hi Sukumar: This is a migration project from one R/3 4,6C to another one (5.0). Exits in this area may have influence on postings to be distributed immediately when posted in the source system to any target system. My task is, to migrate existing open items including special G/L items. There is just a transaction to create such idocs (GAL3), but i do not see, what this transaction would help. So a program of my own must be created.

Generate 2 line items with posting keys in same table while using FM .

Dear Expert ,
For T-code f-65 ,I have to park a FI Document .i tried with PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 for parked Document . But i am not successfully park the document .
with the help of F-65 the data Segregate between Tables VBSEGS and VBSEGD with respecting Posting key . but with this Fm entire entry is displaying in table VBSEGS .For example it generated two line items with posting keys '15' and '40' and these both are displayed in VBSEGS whereas posting key '15' has to be displayed in VBSEGD.
when i check this Document in FBV0 Error reflect " G/L Account 0012000 1001 Does not Exist ".
Here my code -
DATA:   XT_BKPF LIKE BKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG1 LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEC LIKE BSEC OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSET LIKE BSET OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEZ LIKE BSEZ OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BKORM LIKE BKORM OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_THEAD LIKE THEAD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTTAB LIKE ACSPLT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTWT LIKE WITH_ITEMX OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA :    XTEXT_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XI_UF05A LIKE UF05A,
          XI_XCMPL TYPE XFELD VALUE 'X',
          XFS006_FB01 LIKE FS006 ,
          XI_TCODE LIKE T020-TCODE VALUE 'F-65',
          XI_PARGB LIKE RF05A-PARGB        ,
          XI_TCODE_INT TYPE TCODE           .
DATA P_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
XT_BKPF-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BKPF-GJAHR     =     2011.
XT_BKPF-BLART     =     'DZ'.
XT_BKPF-BLDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-BUDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-MONAT     =     '06'.
XT_BKPF-CPUDT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-WWERT     = SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-USNAM     =     'ABAPER'.
XT_BKPF-TCODE     =     'F-65'.
APPEND XT_BKPF.
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '001'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '40'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'S' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = '241000'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
Vendor line item - required even for header only - BSEG table
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '002'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '15'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'H' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = 'PC04000001'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
CALL FUNCTION 'PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01'
   EXPORTING
     TEXT_UPDATE            = XTEXT_UPDATE
     TEXT_ITEM_UPDATE       = XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE
I_UF05A                =
     I_XCMPL                = XI_XCMPL
FS006_FB01             =
      I_TCODE                = XI_TCODE
I_PARGB                =
I_TCODE_INT            =
IMPORTING
    XEPBBP                 = CHECK_A
    TABLES
      T_BKPF                 = XT_BKPF
      T_BSEG                 = XT_BSEG
      T_BSEC                 = XT_BSEC
      T_BSET                 = XT_BSET
      T_BSEZ                 = XT_BSEZ
T_BKORM                =
T_THEAD                =
T_SPLTTAB              =
T_SPLTWT               =
          EXCEPTIONS
            ERROR_MESSAGE = 1.
P_RETURN-ID         = SY-MSGID.
P_RETURN-TYPE       = SY-MSGTY.
P_RETURN-NUMBER     = SY-MSGNO.
APPEND P_RETURN.
     p_return-MESSAGE_V1 = XSYMSGV.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
WRITE :/ sy-subrc , sy-MSGV1 .
Thanks ,
Ashish Gupta

Hi Raghuram,
I found a very important SAP Note 103051, details are below.
An IDoc processed by function module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM (of category INVOIC01) must not refer to the same purchase order item in several invoice items. This is also valid if for a goods receipt-related invoice verification several delivery notes belong to the same purchase order item.
Depending on the system settings and the situation, various error messages can occur (for example, FD240 'Order item ... selected more than once' or M8050 'Balance not zero: & debits: & credits: &').
In this situation module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM generates error message M8321 'Document contains same order item more than once'.
For example, this situation occurs if you work with individual batch valuation and the SD billing document executes a batch split for different batches which belong to the same purchase order item and delivery.
Other terms
INVOIC, SAPLIEDI, M8047, M8, 321
Reason and Prerequisites
This is because of the program design.
Solution
There is no solution for IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM.
Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM (only as of Release 4.0) for the logistics invoice verification can distinguish different goods receipts by means of the delivery note number. For this purpose, GR-related invoice verification must be active.
Owing to this symptom, billing documents for single batch valuation with batch split cannot be settled in MM-EDI inbound processing. The settlement generates exactly the situation described (several invoice items for the same purchase order item). In this case, the only solution is to deactivate the billing of the batch sub-items in SD Customizing and to calculate the main item only.
Hope this helps.
Reward if helpful.
Thanks

I can't select a Payment Method and a key for Terms of Payment Key...

Hi All,
I've created a G/L account with open item management but it isn't a reconciliation account.
When I post a document on this G/L account, I'd like to select a Payment Method and a key for Terms of Payment Key.
I can't find the fields to select them....
Why does it happen?
Thanks

Hi Umberto Gandalf,
I got you. Payment Terms are objects used to excecute incoming and aoutgoing payments, and Payment Method are used to define net due date and conced discounts.
Srikanth said above a way to post an invoice by FB01. If you are trying to post an invoice you should not use an Open Item acount. You must use Customes and Vendors Master data to do it. Your GL Account must be assigned in those masters data to take place on GL balance. Payment Terms and Payments Mathods will be entered during Invoice posting process.

Terms of payment in sd module along with the fico interface

Explain breifly abou the terms of payment in sd module along with the fico interface?

Hi,
See the the SAP documentation of Daylimit.
For terms of payment which depend on whether or not the baseline date is
after or before the 15th of the month, you can define a two-part payment
term under the same terms of payment key. The terms of payment key is
expanded by the day limit entered here. Thus there are two entries in
which different terms can be specified.
In your case,
if rbkp-bldat is between 1st and 5th of the month, extract
data related to t052-ztagg = '05'.
If rbkp-bldat is between 6th and 20th of the month, extract
data related to t052-ztagg = '20'.
if rbkp-bldat is between 21st and end of month, extract
data related to t052-ztagg = '31'
Regards
Vinod

Can we clear more line items with different currency within one Vendor

Dear All,
Please guide us the following issue is
Can we clear two line items with different currency within one Vendor (i.e., Down Payment entry passed in EUR and Invoice in JPY).
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Srinivas

Hi
I suppose this should be possible in F-44, for any difference in forex enter a new line item 'Charge off diff.' to Dr/Cr Forex gain/loss account
Thank You,

Terms of payment key in INVOIC01 Idoc

Hi,
We are processing inbound INVOIC01 IDOC types to load suppliers invoices in SAP.
In the segment E1EDK01, the field ZTERM ( Terms of payment key ) is filled with a valid value. The problem is the invoice is created with blanks in that field, so the value of the IDOC is not transported to the invoice.
Does anyone have had a similar problem, and knows how can we solve this ?
Or does anyone has any idea of what may being heppening ? Like the need to use another segment of the IDOC or anothe issue(s) i may have attention to.
Thanks,
Paulo Sousa

I,
I solved the problem with EXIT_SAPLMRMH_014.
The process does not pass in other sugested user-exits.
Kind regards,
Paulo Sousa

Vendor Line item with Opening and Closing Balances report regarding

Dear All,
I need a report for vendor line items with Opening and Closing balances.
Thanks in advance
Sateesh

Hi
Try S_ALR_87012082 - Vendor Balances in Local Currency
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Customer line items with balance carry forward no opening balance

Hello FI Experts,
We have ticket where the user is using a Z* Report for Customer line items with balance carry forward. In 31.01.2007 user has posted some legacy data, latter he was executing this Z* report then user can see the values posted on the same day (31.01.2007) as line items. But he was executing the report on 01.02.2007 then he was not able to see the line item as well as the values posted on 31.01.2007 as opening balance as on 01.02.2007. But if we run the report as on 01.01.2008 then we are able to see the values which are carry forwarded as opening balances. Did anyone have worked on this type of scenario?
Requirement Here Is: The values that have been posted on 31.03.2007 which are still open line items should get displayed as opening balance as on 01.02.2007.
Thanks for helping on this issue.

Hi,
Any report will get data from Tables. Please check whether the table you have used to develop this report has opening balance.
Balance will be carry forwarded only when you run the balance carry forward program. Check whether this was run for the date you have specified. This can be done in the year end.
If you are checking in the middle of the year, then the balance will not be carry forwarded.
Regards,
B. Radhika.

Report for G/L line items with both debit & credit posting accounts

Hi,
My client requires a G/L line items report. It can be possible thru fs10n or fbl3n etc. But he wants to see both the credit and debit accounts in the same line.
for ex: if I open a expense account and show the report of individual documents, he wants to see the corresponding credit item to which bank/cash account it got credited to.
we showed them to double click on that document and goto document overview. but they dont want in that way.
they want to see all the line items with both postings in the same sheet for all line items.
valuable replies will be fairly rewarded.
thanks,
chaitanya

Hi,
U can use the following TCodes...
- S_ALR_87012287
- S_ALR_87012289
- S_ALR_87012291
But i am not sure if your client will be happy...
This is a very common req and the only solution possible is to have a customized report for the client..
Hope its clear..
Cheers
Raghu

Unable to delete line item with 0 quantity in Invoice.

Hi Experts,
I came across a Invoice which reflects in VF04 as pending Billing due list. When i checked at the inter company Invoice i came across a line item with "0" quantity and price as zero, interestingly the replinishment cross company delivery document for the same line item for "0" quantity had a Batch assigned to it.
Now the issue is cusotmer has selected the line item with XX quantity and have selected the accounting document to be generated but the line item with "0 was left over and now still reflects in VF04.
Customer does not want to reverse the full cycle to resolve the issue since the document was created a year back.My Question is can we get the line item with "0" quantity to clear accounting so that it will not reflect in VF04.If so what will be process to do that.
Thanks in Advance to advice.
Regards,
Sridhar.R

Hi,
It is not possible to delete this line item, you can discuss with your client and delete it from the table.
And now coming to the reasons why it has come into the invoice & Delivery
1. The Batch Item category must have been configured as relevant for billing...check this and make it irrelevant if the client does not do batch specific billing. --- This will stop the batches from coming into the invoice.
2. Check for the batch item category in delivery if Zero quanity is allowed...if it is allowed make it not allowed and make it an Error message, whenever there is a zero quantity system will give a message.

PO Line Item with Open Quantity

HI all,
How should i select a PO line item with Open Quantity? Is it possible to post GR for a PO which is set for Delivery Complition but still has Open Quantity ..
please help me how to check for OPEN QUANTITY.
Thanks,
Ravi.

Hi all,
Thanks for your answer, but can you be some more specific on what calculations need to be done.
I need to Post a GR for all PO where PO line items have Open Quantity.
Thanks
ravi.

How to pull PO line item with "Block" indicator

Hi all
In ME2N, how do I pull all the PO line items with the "block" indicator set?
I couldn't find a field in dynamic selection.
Thanks in advance!

HI,
1. In ME2N -
>Go to EDIT menu and then select Dynamic Selections (Shift+F4).
Next select Purchasing Document item and double click on deletion indicator.
Select the indicator and excute.
Hope it helps..
regards

I have a problem regarding sales order line item with confimed quanity

Hi Experts,
I have a problem regarding sales order line item with confimed quanity with '0' with delivery block but confirming the sales order quantity once the order is released from credit check.
The situation arises as per the below scenarios.
Scenario - 1 - When the sales order has two line item - one line item with confirmed qunaity in the schedule line and for the 2nd line item there is no available stock for the Material xxxxxx.
Initially the sales order is created for the line item 2 with confirmed quantity = 0, and having the delivery block = 01 for the Material xxxxxx and the order is set with credit check. Once the order is relased from the credit check. The quanity for the item 2 where the confirmed quantity will be = 0 ( Where it is not changing the confirmed quantity)
Scenario -2- Updating the order qunaity for the line item 2 as (9Pcs) it will goes to credit check and save the order.
Maintain the stock for the line item 2 ( 5 Pcs).
Once the order is released from the credit check. Then for the line item 2 the confirm quanity will be seting to 5 Pcs with Delivery blcok 01.
This should not happen, When the credit check is released even though if it has stock based on the delivery blockl it should set the confirmed quanity to Zero.
Can you please help me how to solve this issue.
Looking forward for your reply.
Thanks and Regards,

Hi,
I agree with your point. In the sales order When the complete delivery check box is enabled where the confimed qty is set to zero, it is fine but when we save the orderr it goes to credit check. Once we release the order using VKM3 where in the sales order the confimed quantity is setting to 5, But it should set to Zero quantity. Quatity should not be get confirmed it should be Zero Quantity.
Further in SPRO - customizing in the deliveries blocking reasons - It has a tick mark in the confirmation blcok. But we dont want to remove the - Confirmation Block tick mark
Please any one can help me if you have any solution to solve this problem.
Thanks and Regards.

Terms of Payment Key in line item with Special G/L Indicator

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for